Efficacy and toxicity of KRASG12C inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: a meta-analysis

Background The efficacy and toxicity of KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully consistent. Methods Clinical trials evaluating KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors for advanced solid tumors were searched from PubMed, Embase, and C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of surgical oncology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 182 - 12
Main Authors Dang, Shoutao, Zhang, Shuyang, Zhao, Jingyang, Li, Wei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central Ltd 16.07.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background The efficacy and toxicity of KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully consistent. Methods Clinical trials evaluating KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors for advanced solid tumors were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases up to 31st December 2023. The characteristics of the studies and the results of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were extracted. Results Ten studies with 925 heavily pretreated advanced patients harboring KRAS.sup.G12C mutation were included. For total population, the pooled analysis of ORR was 28.6% (95%CI, 21.2-36.6%), DCR was 85.5% (95%CI, 82.2-88.6%), PFS rate at 6 months (PFS6) was 49.6% (95%CI, 41.4-57.9%), PFS rate at 12 months (PFS12) was 26.7% (95%CI, 19.8-34.1%), OS rates at 6 months (OS6) was 76.2% (95%CI, 68.8-82.9%), OS rates at 12 months (OS12) was 47.8% (95%CI, 38.6-57.0%). The pooled analysis of any grade trAEs was 79.3% (95%CI, 66.2-90.0%) and grade three or more trAEs was 24.4% (95%CI, 16.7-32.9%). The median time to response and DoR results from individual data were 1.39 months (95%CI, 1.37-1.41 months) and 10.54 months (95%CI, 7.72-13.36 months). Sotorasib had significantly lower pooled incidences of any trAEs (OR, 0.07, 95%CI, 0.03-0.14) and grade three or more trAES (OR, 0.34, 95%CI, 0.24-0.49) compared with adagrasib. Conclusions KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors have good ORR, DCR, PFS rate, OS rate, tolerable trAEs, and early response with long duration in advanced solid tumors; however, most of the pooled results were heterogeneous. Sotorasib has shown better safety results. Keywords: KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors, Solid tumors, Meta-analysis
AbstractList The efficacy and toxicity of KRASG12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully consistent.BACKGROUNDThe efficacy and toxicity of KRASG12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully consistent.Clinical trials evaluating KRASG12C inhibitors for advanced solid tumors were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases up to 31st December 2023. The characteristics of the studies and the results of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were extracted.METHODSClinical trials evaluating KRASG12C inhibitors for advanced solid tumors were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases up to 31st December 2023. The characteristics of the studies and the results of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were extracted.Ten studies with 925 heavily pretreated advanced patients harboring KRASG12C mutation were included. For total population, the pooled analysis of ORR was 28.6% (95%CI, 21.2-36.6%), DCR was 85.5% (95%CI, 82.2-88.6%), PFS rate at 6 months (PFS6) was 49.6% (95%CI, 41.4-57.9%), PFS rate at 12 months (PFS12) was 26.7% (95%CI, 19.8-34.1%), OS rates at 6 months (OS6) was 76.2% (95%CI, 68.8-82.9%), OS rates at 12 months (OS12) was 47.8% (95%CI, 38.6-57.0%). The pooled analysis of any grade trAEs was 79.3% (95%CI, 66.2-90.0%) and grade three or more trAEs was 24.4% (95%CI, 16.7-32.9%). The median time to response and DoR results from individual data were 1.39 months (95%CI, 1.37-1.41 months) and 10.54 months (95%CI, 7.72-13.36 months). Sotorasib had significantly lower pooled incidences of any trAEs (OR, 0.07, 95%CI, 0.03-0.14) and grade three or more trAES (OR, 0.34, 95%CI, 0.24-0.49) compared with adagrasib.RESULTSTen studies with 925 heavily pretreated advanced patients harboring KRASG12C mutation were included. For total population, the pooled analysis of ORR was 28.6% (95%CI, 21.2-36.6%), DCR was 85.5% (95%CI, 82.2-88.6%), PFS rate at 6 months (PFS6) was 49.6% (95%CI, 41.4-57.9%), PFS rate at 12 months (PFS12) was 26.7% (95%CI, 19.8-34.1%), OS rates at 6 months (OS6) was 76.2% (95%CI, 68.8-82.9%), OS rates at 12 months (OS12) was 47.8% (95%CI, 38.6-57.0%). The pooled analysis of any grade trAEs was 79.3% (95%CI, 66.2-90.0%) and grade three or more trAEs was 24.4% (95%CI, 16.7-32.9%). The median time to response and DoR results from individual data were 1.39 months (95%CI, 1.37-1.41 months) and 10.54 months (95%CI, 7.72-13.36 months). Sotorasib had significantly lower pooled incidences of any trAEs (OR, 0.07, 95%CI, 0.03-0.14) and grade three or more trAES (OR, 0.34, 95%CI, 0.24-0.49) compared with adagrasib.KRASG12C inhibitors have good ORR, DCR, PFS rate, OS rate, tolerable trAEs, and early response with long duration in advanced solid tumors; however, most of the pooled results were heterogeneous. Sotorasib has shown better safety results.CONCLUSIONSKRASG12C inhibitors have good ORR, DCR, PFS rate, OS rate, tolerable trAEs, and early response with long duration in advanced solid tumors; however, most of the pooled results were heterogeneous. Sotorasib has shown better safety results.
Background The efficacy and toxicity of KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully consistent. Methods Clinical trials evaluating KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors for advanced solid tumors were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases up to 31st December 2023. The characteristics of the studies and the results of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were extracted. Results Ten studies with 925 heavily pretreated advanced patients harboring KRAS.sup.G12C mutation were included. For total population, the pooled analysis of ORR was 28.6% (95%CI, 21.2-36.6%), DCR was 85.5% (95%CI, 82.2-88.6%), PFS rate at 6 months (PFS6) was 49.6% (95%CI, 41.4-57.9%), PFS rate at 12 months (PFS12) was 26.7% (95%CI, 19.8-34.1%), OS rates at 6 months (OS6) was 76.2% (95%CI, 68.8-82.9%), OS rates at 12 months (OS12) was 47.8% (95%CI, 38.6-57.0%). The pooled analysis of any grade trAEs was 79.3% (95%CI, 66.2-90.0%) and grade three or more trAEs was 24.4% (95%CI, 16.7-32.9%). The median time to response and DoR results from individual data were 1.39 months (95%CI, 1.37-1.41 months) and 10.54 months (95%CI, 7.72-13.36 months). Sotorasib had significantly lower pooled incidences of any trAEs (OR, 0.07, 95%CI, 0.03-0.14) and grade three or more trAES (OR, 0.34, 95%CI, 0.24-0.49) compared with adagrasib. Conclusions KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors have good ORR, DCR, PFS rate, OS rate, tolerable trAEs, and early response with long duration in advanced solid tumors; however, most of the pooled results were heterogeneous. Sotorasib has shown better safety results. Keywords: KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors, Solid tumors, Meta-analysis
Abstract Background The efficacy and toxicity of KRASG12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully consistent. Methods Clinical trials evaluating KRASG12C inhibitors for advanced solid tumors were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases up to 31st December 2023. The characteristics of the studies and the results of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were extracted. Results Ten studies with 925 heavily pretreated advanced patients harboring KRASG12C mutation were included. For total population, the pooled analysis of ORR was 28.6% (95%CI, 21.2-36.6%), DCR was 85.5% (95%CI, 82.2-88.6%), PFS rate at 6 months (PFS6) was 49.6% (95%CI, 41.4-57.9%), PFS rate at 12 months (PFS12) was 26.7% (95%CI, 19.8-34.1%), OS rates at 6 months (OS6) was 76.2% (95%CI, 68.8-82.9%), OS rates at 12 months (OS12) was 47.8% (95%CI, 38.6-57.0%). The pooled analysis of any grade trAEs was 79.3% (95%CI, 66.2-90.0%) and grade three or more trAEs was 24.4% (95%CI, 16.7-32.9%). The median time to response and DoR results from individual data were 1.39 months (95%CI, 1.37–1.41 months) and 10.54 months (95%CI, 7.72–13.36 months). Sotorasib had significantly lower pooled incidences of any trAEs (OR, 0.07, 95%CI, 0.03–0.14) and grade three or more trAES (OR, 0.34, 95%CI, 0.24–0.49) compared with adagrasib. Conclusions KRASG12C inhibitors have good ORR, DCR, PFS rate, OS rate, tolerable trAEs, and early response with long duration in advanced solid tumors; however, most of the pooled results were heterogeneous. Sotorasib has shown better safety results.
The efficacy and toxicity of KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully consistent. Clinical trials evaluating KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors for advanced solid tumors were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases up to 31st December 2023. The characteristics of the studies and the results of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were extracted. Ten studies with 925 heavily pretreated advanced patients harboring KRAS.sup.G12C mutation were included. For total population, the pooled analysis of ORR was 28.6% (95%CI, 21.2-36.6%), DCR was 85.5% (95%CI, 82.2-88.6%), PFS rate at 6 months (PFS6) was 49.6% (95%CI, 41.4-57.9%), PFS rate at 12 months (PFS12) was 26.7% (95%CI, 19.8-34.1%), OS rates at 6 months (OS6) was 76.2% (95%CI, 68.8-82.9%), OS rates at 12 months (OS12) was 47.8% (95%CI, 38.6-57.0%). The pooled analysis of any grade trAEs was 79.3% (95%CI, 66.2-90.0%) and grade three or more trAEs was 24.4% (95%CI, 16.7-32.9%). The median time to response and DoR results from individual data were 1.39 months (95%CI, 1.37-1.41 months) and 10.54 months (95%CI, 7.72-13.36 months). Sotorasib had significantly lower pooled incidences of any trAEs (OR, 0.07, 95%CI, 0.03-0.14) and grade three or more trAES (OR, 0.34, 95%CI, 0.24-0.49) compared with adagrasib. KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors have good ORR, DCR, PFS rate, OS rate, tolerable trAEs, and early response with long duration in advanced solid tumors; however, most of the pooled results were heterogeneous. Sotorasib has shown better safety results.
ArticleNumber 182
Audience Academic
Author Li, Wei
Zhao, Jingyang
Zhang, Shuyang
Dang, Shoutao
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Shoutao
  surname: Dang
  fullname: Dang, Shoutao
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Shuyang
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Shuyang
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jingyang
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Jingyang
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Wei
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Wei
BookMark eNp9kltrFDEYhgep2IP-Aa8GBPFmak4zSbyRZam1WBA83YZvcthNmUnqJFvcf2-mU6QrIrnIl-R9H5J872l1FGKwVfUSo3OMRfc2YSJb3iDCGkQZk414Up1gxnnDBZZHj-rj6jSlG4QIpS19Vh1TiXBZkZPqx4VzXoPe1xBMneMvr33e19HVn76svl5isq592Pre5zilUtZg7iBoa-oUB18cu7EcvKuhHm2GBgIM--TT8-qpgyHZFw_zWfX9w8W39cfm-vPl1Xp13WjGWW5oTwQgoo3VvZOdk9Sx1hnemw5YK4yWFHXcWGy61nCHdId1j21nmOuJ7QQ9q64Wrolwo24nP8K0VxG8ut-I00bBlL0erOKGtD0I3kpJmEasL1SnJZeiADVhhfV-Yd3u-tEabUOeYDiAHp4Ev1WbeKcwJi1GkhfCmwfCFH_ubMpq9EnbYYBg4y4pikRpGe4YKdJXi3QD5W4-uFiQeparlUCYiZaRWXX-D1UZxo5elzQ4X_YPDK8fGbYWhrwtjdplH0M6FJJFqKeY0mTdn3dipOZ0qSVdqqRL3adLzb8t_jKVsMDMLtfyw_-svwExzNL7
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11523_024_01107_3
Cites_doi 10.1056/NEJMoa2105281
10.1056/NEJMoa2308795
10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101974
10.1056/NEJMoa2212419
10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9674
10.1038/s41586-019-1694-1
10.1056/NEJMoa2103695
10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00605-7
10.1038/35074129
10.1136/bmj.n71
10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.006
10.3390/cancers15235582
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01180
10.1056/NEJMoa2208470
10.1200/JCO.21.02752
10.21873/anticanres.15186
10.1093/annonc/mdu378
10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107060
10.1056/NEJMoa2303810
10.1056/NEJMoa1917239
10.1016/j.jtho.2023.03.015
10.3892/mco.2021.2255
10.3390/cancers14030850
10.3390/jcm12020709
10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00221-0
10.1038/nrd4389
10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223433
10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.06.007
10.1056/NEJMoa2204619
10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
2024. The Author(s).
The Author(s) 2024 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12957-024-03449-8
DatabaseName CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic




Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1477-7819
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_7d25ba8759924c04be1dfc97981e6c24
PMC11251097
A801485422
10_1186_s12957_024_03449_8
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29R
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
PMFND
7X8
PPXIY
5PM
PJZUB
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3b28a02cdecbf96f93f45fd7bd6a458dc93067de1d65d7f0c61cb1e6d4fb2e683
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1477-7819
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:57 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:33:07 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:21:24 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:07:27 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:06:34 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:24:45 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:21:40 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c474t-3b28a02cdecbf96f93f45fd7bd6a458dc93067de1d65d7f0c61cb1e6d4fb2e683
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12957-024-03449-8
PMID 39010022
PQID 3081291642
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7d25ba8759924c04be1dfc97981e6c24
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11251097
proquest_miscellaneous_3081291642
gale_infotracmisc_A801485422
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A801485422
gale_healthsolutions_A801485422
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_024_03449_8
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12957_024_03449_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-07-16
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-07-16
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-07-16
  day: 16
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle World journal of surgical oncology
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References BA Lanman (3449_CR10) 2020; 63
MG Fakih (3449_CR14) 2022; 23
F Skoulidis (3449_CR12) 2021; 384
AD Cox (3449_CR5) 2014; 13
MJ Page (3449_CR21) 2021; 372
MR Janes (3449_CR8) 2018; 172
JH Strickler (3449_CR13) 2023; 388
QA Chen (3449_CR26) 2024; 200
K Slim (3449_CR22) 2003; 73
DS Hong (3449_CR11) 2020; 383
L Johnson (3449_CR3) 2001; 410
AJ de Langen (3449_CR15) 2023; 401
3449_CR1
SI Ou (3449_CR18) 2022; 40
3449_CR6
PA Jänne (3449_CR16) 2022; 387
AK Murugan (3449_CR2) 2019; 59
3449_CR23
CJ Allegra (3449_CR30) 2016; 34
M Díez-Alonso (3449_CR25) 2021; 14
SS Zhang (3449_CR27) 2023; 14
R Yaeger (3449_CR20) 2023; 388
M Nagasaka (3449_CR9) 2020; 84
A Sacher (3449_CR19) 2023; 389
Z Li (3449_CR17) 2023; 18
MM Awad (3449_CR31) 2021; 384
MJ Sorich (3449_CR29) 2015; 26
J Canon (3449_CR7) 2019; 575
X Wu (3449_CR4) 2023; 14
MG Fakih (3449_CR28) 2023; 389
T Sato (3449_CR24) 2021; 41
References_xml – volume: 384
  start-page: 2382
  issue: 25
  year: 2021
  ident: 3449_CR31
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105281
– volume: 389
  start-page: 2125
  issue: 23
  year: 2023
  ident: 3449_CR28
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2308795
– volume: 84
  start-page: 101974
  year: 2020
  ident: 3449_CR9
  publication-title: Cancer Treat Rev
  doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101974
– volume: 388
  start-page: 44
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 3449_CR20
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212419
– volume: 34
  start-page: 179
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 3449_CR30
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9674
– volume: 575
  start-page: 217
  issue: 7781
  year: 2019
  ident: 3449_CR7
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1694-1
– volume: 384
  start-page: 2371
  issue: 25
  year: 2021
  ident: 3449_CR12
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103695
– volume: 23
  start-page: 115
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 3449_CR14
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00605-7
– volume: 410
  start-page: 1111
  issue: 6832
  year: 2001
  ident: 3449_CR3
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/35074129
– volume: 372
  start-page: n71
  year: 2021
  ident: 3449_CR21
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
– volume: 172
  start-page: 578
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 3449_CR8
  publication-title: Cell
  doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.006
– ident: 3449_CR1
  doi: 10.3390/cancers15235582
– volume: 63
  start-page: 52
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 3449_CR10
  publication-title: J Med Chem
  doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01180
– volume: 388
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 3449_CR13
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208470
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2530
  issue: 23
  year: 2022
  ident: 3449_CR18
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02752
– volume: 41
  start-page: 3905
  issue: 8
  year: 2021
  ident: 3449_CR24
  publication-title: Anticancer Res
  doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15186
– volume: 26
  start-page: 13
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 3449_CR29
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu378
– volume: 200
  start-page: 107060
  year: 2024
  ident: 3449_CR26
  publication-title: Pharmacol Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107060
– volume: 389
  start-page: 710
  issue: 8
  year: 2023
  ident: 3449_CR19
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303810
– volume: 383
  start-page: 1207
  issue: 13
  year: 2020
  ident: 3449_CR11
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917239
– volume: 18
  start-page: 940
  issue: 7
  year: 2023
  ident: 3449_CR17
  publication-title: J Thorac Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.03.015
– volume: 14
  start-page: 93
  issue: 5
  year: 2021
  ident: 3449_CR25
  publication-title: Mol Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.3892/mco.2021.2255
– ident: 3449_CR23
  doi: 10.3390/cancers14030850
– ident: 3449_CR6
  doi: 10.3390/jcm12020709
– volume: 401
  start-page: 733
  issue: 10378
  year: 2023
  ident: 3449_CR15
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00221-0
– volume: 13
  start-page: 828
  issue: 11
  year: 2014
  ident: 3449_CR5
  publication-title: Nat Rev Drug Discov
  doi: 10.1038/nrd4389
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1223433
  year: 2023
  ident: 3449_CR4
  publication-title: Front Immunol
  doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223433
– volume: 59
  start-page: 23
  year: 2019
  ident: 3449_CR2
  publication-title: Semin Cancer Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.06.007
– volume: 387
  start-page: 120
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 3449_CR16
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619
– volume: 73
  start-page: 712
  issue: 9
  year: 2003
  ident: 3449_CR22
  publication-title: ANZ J Surg
  doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
– volume: 14
  start-page: 27
  year: 2023
  ident: 3449_CR27
  publication-title: Lung Cancer (Auckl)
SSID ssj0023353
Score 2.3642023
Snippet Background The efficacy and toxicity of KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not...
The efficacy and toxicity of KRAS.sup.G12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully...
The efficacy and toxicity of KRASG12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not fully...
Abstract Background The efficacy and toxicity of KRASG12C inhibitors were evaluated for advanced solid tumors in several studies; however, the results were not...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 182
SubjectTerms Analysis
Cancer
Care and treatment
Complications and side effects
Enzyme inhibitors
KRASG12C inhibitors
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Meta-analysis
Online databases
Panitumumab
Physiological aspects
Solid tumors
Testing
Tumors
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxUxEA_Sg3gR6wc-rW0EwYOE7mbz2dtraS1KPaiV3kI-6YLdJ3YftP-9k-zuo6ugF2_LzgQ2v8zszJDkNwi9YcFVQTaUWOc4FCheECeVJoKCecUmhETzbeSzT-L0nH244Bd3Wn3lM2EDPfAA3L4MlDsLWbWGSsFXzMU6JK-lVnUUnhYmUIh5UzE1llpNw5vpiowS-9cQ1bgkEI9IprjTRM3CUGHr__Of_Ps5yTuB5-QRejhmjHg5fOk2uhe7x-j-2bgn_gR9O84sENbfYtsF3K9u4H1_i1cJf_y8_PK-pke47S5b1-a-OvCIp21_DGbXwoj1FQgOsMVXsbfEjiwlT9H5yfHXo1MydksgnknWk8ZRZSvqQ_QuaZF0kxhPQbogLOMqeJ2rgwDwCR5kglWpvQMMA0uORqGaZ2irW3XxOcLMSlGBI1snE4Oy1QkalY46OMurpOkC1RN4xo9U4rmjxXdTSgolzAC4AcBNAdyoBXq3GfNjINL4q_ZhXpONZibBLi_ANMxoGuZfprFAe3lFzXCjdOPKZpkZcxRnFCbytmhkZ4YJwFoNdxIAhkyLNdPcmWmCE_qZ-PVkNSaL8sm1Lq7W16aBnItCDs5AR83MaTa5uaRrLwvTd53Tz0rLF_8DjpfoAS0eIEktdtBW_3MdX0FG1bvd4jy_AOujHHo
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Efficacy and toxicity of KRASG12C inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: a meta-analysis
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/3081291642
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11251097
https://doaj.org/article/7d25ba8759924c04be1dfc97981e6c24
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3rixMxEA_3APGL-MTqWVcQ_CDR3Ww2D0GkPXoeSg-pVopfQl7rLdxttd3C9b93km6Lq4f4ZVmSSWAmMzszm-Q3CD2nzqSO5wRrYwpIUCzDhguJGQH18rlzJQm3kcdn7HRKP8yK2R7aljtqBbi8NrUL9aSmi4tXVz_X78Dg30aDF-z1EnxWwTF4GxwA7CQW--gQPBMPFQ3GdLerQPI8olJmlHPMwRVuL9FcO0fHUUU8_7-_2n-epPzNNZ3cRrfamDIZbJTgDtrz9V10Y9zumt9DX0cBJ0LbdaJrlzTzK2hv1sm8TD5OBp_fZ-Q4qerzylSh8g68JtuDAQkoZgUjVpfQ8SbRyaVvNNYtjsl9ND0ZfTk-xW09BWwppw3ODRE6JdZ5a0rJSpmXtCgdN45pWghnZcgfnM8cKxwvYd0yazLPHC0N8UzkD9BBPa_9Q5RQzVkKpq4NLykktoYRL6SXzugiLSXpoWwrPGVbsPFQ8-JCxaRDMLURuAKBqyhwJXro5W7Mjw3Uxj-ph2FNdpQBJjs2zBffVWt1ijtSGA0pmYQ006bUAG-llVwKYMsS2kNPw4qqzZ3TnbGrQcDUEQUlwMiLSBEUEBiAtdrcWgAxBOCsDuVRhxLM1Ha6n221RoWucLat9vPVUuUQlRGI0inQiI46dZjr9tTVecQCz0KAmkr-6D-mf4xukqjgHGfsCB00i5V_AiFVY_pon894Hx0OR2efJv34Y6IfbQeek-G3X5XLH8o
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+and+toxicity+of+KRASG12C+inhibitors+in+advanced+solid+tumors%3A+a+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Dang%2C+Shoutao&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Shuyang&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Jingyang&rft.au=Li%2C+Wei&rft.date=2024-07-16&rft.issn=1477-7819&rft.eissn=1477-7819&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=182&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12957-024-03449-8&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon