Safety and efficacy of adaptive atrial pacing regulated by blood pressure during low‐level exercise: a proof‐of‐concept study

Aims Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study aims to compare safety and efficacy of standard pacemaker programming (DDD or DDDR) and a novel pacing algorithm PressurePace™ (BaroPace In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inESC Heart Failure Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 2460 - 2463
Main Authors Burnam, Michael, Develle, Robert, Polosajian, Leo, Nalbandian, Shakeh, Ellenbogen, Kenneth, Gang, Eli
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.08.2024
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Aims Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study aims to compare safety and efficacy of standard pacemaker programming (DDD or DDDR) and a novel pacing algorithm PressurePace™ (BaroPace Inc, Issaquah, WA, USA) which modulates atrial pacing rate based on blood pressure (BPAP). Methods This prospective, randomized, double‐blind, non‐significant risk proof of concept study was conducted at two large cardiology clinics in Los Angeles, California, USA. Subjects underwent two modified Bruce protocol graded treadmill exercise tests in which pacemaker programming was randomized to either standard programming (DDD or DDDR), or BPAP at least 1 week apart. Physiological measurements of heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were collected at 2 min intervals. During the BPAP treadmill test, the pacemaker activity sensor was disabled. The PressurePace algorithm instructed the pacemaker technician to modify or leave unchanged the atrial pacing rate based on these BP measurements. Subjects and clinical staff were blinded to pacemaker programming, only the pacemaker technician was unblinded. Results Ten subjects with HFpEF associated with hypertension who also had permanent dual‐chamber pacemakers, previously implanted for standard clinical indications, participated in the study. Mean age was 70.1 ± 6.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction of 54.8 ± 1.9%. Exercise duration increased in all 10 subjects, when paced in the BPAP mode compared with standard pacemaker programming, showing a mean increase of 117 s (26%, P = 0.0016). The algorithm could adjust HR at each 2 min interval. The majority of subjects (60%) had their atrial pacing rate increased an average of 20% at t = 2 min. In the remaining 40% of subjects, the algorithm instructed HR to be unchanged. In two subjects, the pacing rate was not increased until t = 6 min. In contrast, subjects programmed to DDDR experienced an average of 45% increase in atrial pacing rate at t = 2 min. In the post‐treadmill recovery period, SBP was higher for subjects who underwent BPAP. This difference in SBP was most pronounced immediately post‐treadmill and diminished as subjects progressed through the 30 min recovery period. Statistical significance was achieved at t = 0, 20, and 30 min post‐treadmill. Conclusions An increase in exercise duration was reported in HFpEF subjects using a pacing algorithm that modulated HR based on BP compared with standard programming. These encouraging results form the basis for a larger, randomized cross‐over trial to confirm these initial observations, further characterize the safety, efficacy, and possible mechanisms of action in both acute and longer‐term treatment.
AbstractList Abstract Aims Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study aims to compare safety and efficacy of standard pacemaker programming (DDD or DDDR) and a novel pacing algorithm PressurePace™ (BaroPace Inc, Issaquah, WA, USA) which modulates atrial pacing rate based on blood pressure (BPAP). Methods This prospective, randomized, double‐blind, non‐significant risk proof of concept study was conducted at two large cardiology clinics in Los Angeles, California, USA. Subjects underwent two modified Bruce protocol graded treadmill exercise tests in which pacemaker programming was randomized to either standard programming (DDD or DDDR), or BPAP at least 1 week apart. Physiological measurements of heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were collected at 2 min intervals. During the BPAP treadmill test, the pacemaker activity sensor was disabled. The PressurePace algorithm instructed the pacemaker technician to modify or leave unchanged the atrial pacing rate based on these BP measurements. Subjects and clinical staff were blinded to pacemaker programming, only the pacemaker technician was unblinded. Results Ten subjects with HFpEF associated with hypertension who also had permanent dual‐chamber pacemakers, previously implanted for standard clinical indications, participated in the study. Mean age was 70.1 ± 6.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction of 54.8 ± 1.9%. Exercise duration increased in all 10 subjects, when paced in the BPAP mode compared with standard pacemaker programming, showing a mean increase of 117 s (26%, P = 0.0016). The algorithm could adjust HR at each 2 min interval. The majority of subjects (60%) had their atrial pacing rate increased an average of 20% at t = 2 min. In the remaining 40% of subjects, the algorithm instructed HR to be unchanged. In two subjects, the pacing rate was not increased until t = 6 min. In contrast, subjects programmed to DDDR experienced an average of 45% increase in atrial pacing rate at t = 2 min. In the post‐treadmill recovery period, SBP was higher for subjects who underwent BPAP. This difference in SBP was most pronounced immediately post‐treadmill and diminished as subjects progressed through the 30 min recovery period. Statistical significance was achieved at t = 0, 20, and 30 min post‐treadmill. Conclusions An increase in exercise duration was reported in HFpEF subjects using a pacing algorithm that modulated HR based on BP compared with standard programming. These encouraging results form the basis for a larger, randomized cross‐over trial to confirm these initial observations, further characterize the safety, efficacy, and possible mechanisms of action in both acute and longer‐term treatment.
Aims Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study aims to compare safety and efficacy of standard pacemaker programming (DDD or DDDR) and a novel pacing algorithm PressurePace™ (BaroPace Inc, Issaquah, WA, USA) which modulates atrial pacing rate based on blood pressure (BPAP). Methods This prospective, randomized, double‐blind, non‐significant risk proof of concept study was conducted at two large cardiology clinics in Los Angeles, California, USA. Subjects underwent two modified Bruce protocol graded treadmill exercise tests in which pacemaker programming was randomized to either standard programming (DDD or DDDR), or BPAP at least 1 week apart. Physiological measurements of heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were collected at 2 min intervals. During the BPAP treadmill test, the pacemaker activity sensor was disabled. The PressurePace algorithm instructed the pacemaker technician to modify or leave unchanged the atrial pacing rate based on these BP measurements. Subjects and clinical staff were blinded to pacemaker programming, only the pacemaker technician was unblinded. Results Ten subjects with HFpEF associated with hypertension who also had permanent dual‐chamber pacemakers, previously implanted for standard clinical indications, participated in the study. Mean age was 70.1 ± 6.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction of 54.8 ± 1.9%. Exercise duration increased in all 10 subjects, when paced in the BPAP mode compared with standard pacemaker programming, showing a mean increase of 117 s (26%, P = 0.0016). The algorithm could adjust HR at each 2 min interval. The majority of subjects (60%) had their atrial pacing rate increased an average of 20% at t = 2 min. In the remaining 40% of subjects, the algorithm instructed HR to be unchanged. In two subjects, the pacing rate was not increased until t = 6 min. In contrast, subjects programmed to DDDR experienced an average of 45% increase in atrial pacing rate at t = 2 min. In the post‐treadmill recovery period, SBP was higher for subjects who underwent BPAP. This difference in SBP was most pronounced immediately post‐treadmill and diminished as subjects progressed through the 30 min recovery period. Statistical significance was achieved at t = 0, 20, and 30 min post‐treadmill. Conclusions An increase in exercise duration was reported in HFpEF subjects using a pacing algorithm that modulated HR based on BP compared with standard programming. These encouraging results form the basis for a larger, randomized cross‐over trial to confirm these initial observations, further characterize the safety, efficacy, and possible mechanisms of action in both acute and longer‐term treatment.
Aims Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study aims to compare safety and efficacy of standard pacemaker programming (DDD or DDDR) and a novel pacing algorithm PressurePace™ (BaroPace Inc, Issaquah, WA, USA) which modulates atrial pacing rate based on blood pressure (BPAP). Methods This prospective, randomized, double‐blind, non‐significant risk proof of concept study was conducted at two large cardiology clinics in Los Angeles, California, USA. Subjects underwent two modified Bruce protocol graded treadmill exercise tests in which pacemaker programming was randomized to either standard programming (DDD or DDDR), or BPAP at least 1 week apart. Physiological measurements of heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were collected at 2 min intervals. During the BPAP treadmill test, the pacemaker activity sensor was disabled. The PressurePace algorithm instructed the pacemaker technician to modify or leave unchanged the atrial pacing rate based on these BP measurements. Subjects and clinical staff were blinded to pacemaker programming, only the pacemaker technician was unblinded. Results Ten subjects with HFpEF associated with hypertension who also had permanent dual‐chamber pacemakers, previously implanted for standard clinical indications, participated in the study. Mean age was 70.1 ± 6.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction of 54.8 ± 1.9%. Exercise duration increased in all 10 subjects, when paced in the BPAP mode compared with standard pacemaker programming, showing a mean increase of 117 s (26%, P = 0.0016). The algorithm could adjust HR at each 2 min interval. The majority of subjects (60%) had their atrial pacing rate increased an average of 20% at t = 2 min. In the remaining 40% of subjects, the algorithm instructed HR to be unchanged. In two subjects, the pacing rate was not increased until t = 6 min. In contrast, subjects programmed to DDDR experienced an average of 45% increase in atrial pacing rate at t = 2 min. In the post‐treadmill recovery period, SBP was higher for subjects who underwent BPAP. This difference in SBP was most pronounced immediately post‐treadmill and diminished as subjects progressed through the 30 min recovery period. Statistical significance was achieved at t = 0, 20, and 30 min post‐treadmill. Conclusions An increase in exercise duration was reported in HFpEF subjects using a pacing algorithm that modulated HR based on BP compared with standard programming. These encouraging results form the basis for a larger, randomized cross‐over trial to confirm these initial observations, further characterize the safety, efficacy, and possible mechanisms of action in both acute and longer‐term treatment.
Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study aims to compare safety and efficacy of standard pacemaker programming (DDD or DDDR) and a novel pacing algorithm PressurePace™ (BaroPace Inc, Issaquah, WA, USA) which modulates atrial pacing rate based on blood pressure (BPAP). This prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-significant risk proof of concept study was conducted at two large cardiology clinics in Los Angeles, California, USA. Subjects underwent two modified Bruce protocol graded treadmill exercise tests in which pacemaker programming was randomized to either standard programming (DDD or DDDR), or BPAP at least 1 week apart. Physiological measurements of heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were collected at 2 min intervals. During the BPAP treadmill test, the pacemaker activity sensor was disabled. The PressurePace algorithm instructed the pacemaker technician to modify or leave unchanged the atrial pacing rate based on these BP measurements. Subjects and clinical staff were blinded to pacemaker programming, only the pacemaker technician was unblinded. Ten subjects with HFpEF associated with hypertension who also had permanent dual-chamber pacemakers, previously implanted for standard clinical indications, participated in the study. Mean age was 70.1 ± 6.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction of 54.8 ± 1.9%. Exercise duration increased in all 10 subjects, when paced in the BPAP mode compared with standard pacemaker programming, showing a mean increase of 117 s (26%, P = 0.0016). The algorithm could adjust HR at each 2 min interval. The majority of subjects (60%) had their atrial pacing rate increased an average of 20% at t = 2 min. In the remaining 40% of subjects, the algorithm instructed HR to be unchanged. In two subjects, the pacing rate was not increased until t = 6 min. In contrast, subjects programmed to DDDR experienced an average of 45% increase in atrial pacing rate at t = 2 min. In the post-treadmill recovery period, SBP was higher for subjects who underwent BPAP. This difference in SBP was most pronounced immediately post-treadmill and diminished as subjects progressed through the 30 min recovery period. Statistical significance was achieved at t = 0, 20, and 30 min post-treadmill. An increase in exercise duration was reported in HFpEF subjects using a pacing algorithm that modulated HR based on BP compared with standard programming. These encouraging results form the basis for a larger, randomized cross-over trial to confirm these initial observations, further characterize the safety, efficacy, and possible mechanisms of action in both acute and longer-term treatment.
Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study aims to compare safety and efficacy of standard pacemaker programming (DDD or DDDR) and a novel pacing algorithm PressurePace™ (BaroPace Inc, Issaquah, WA, USA) which modulates atrial pacing rate based on blood pressure (BPAP).AIMSDespite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study aims to compare safety and efficacy of standard pacemaker programming (DDD or DDDR) and a novel pacing algorithm PressurePace™ (BaroPace Inc, Issaquah, WA, USA) which modulates atrial pacing rate based on blood pressure (BPAP).This prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-significant risk proof of concept study was conducted at two large cardiology clinics in Los Angeles, California, USA. Subjects underwent two modified Bruce protocol graded treadmill exercise tests in which pacemaker programming was randomized to either standard programming (DDD or DDDR), or BPAP at least 1 week apart. Physiological measurements of heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were collected at 2 min intervals. During the BPAP treadmill test, the pacemaker activity sensor was disabled. The PressurePace algorithm instructed the pacemaker technician to modify or leave unchanged the atrial pacing rate based on these BP measurements. Subjects and clinical staff were blinded to pacemaker programming, only the pacemaker technician was unblinded.METHODSThis prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-significant risk proof of concept study was conducted at two large cardiology clinics in Los Angeles, California, USA. Subjects underwent two modified Bruce protocol graded treadmill exercise tests in which pacemaker programming was randomized to either standard programming (DDD or DDDR), or BPAP at least 1 week apart. Physiological measurements of heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were collected at 2 min intervals. During the BPAP treadmill test, the pacemaker activity sensor was disabled. The PressurePace algorithm instructed the pacemaker technician to modify or leave unchanged the atrial pacing rate based on these BP measurements. Subjects and clinical staff were blinded to pacemaker programming, only the pacemaker technician was unblinded.Ten subjects with HFpEF associated with hypertension who also had permanent dual-chamber pacemakers, previously implanted for standard clinical indications, participated in the study. Mean age was 70.1 ± 6.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction of 54.8 ± 1.9%. Exercise duration increased in all 10 subjects, when paced in the BPAP mode compared with standard pacemaker programming, showing a mean increase of 117 s (26%, P = 0.0016). The algorithm could adjust HR at each 2 min interval. The majority of subjects (60%) had their atrial pacing rate increased an average of 20% at t = 2 min. In the remaining 40% of subjects, the algorithm instructed HR to be unchanged. In two subjects, the pacing rate was not increased until t = 6 min. In contrast, subjects programmed to DDDR experienced an average of 45% increase in atrial pacing rate at t = 2 min. In the post-treadmill recovery period, SBP was higher for subjects who underwent BPAP. This difference in SBP was most pronounced immediately post-treadmill and diminished as subjects progressed through the 30 min recovery period. Statistical significance was achieved at t = 0, 20, and 30 min post-treadmill.RESULTSTen subjects with HFpEF associated with hypertension who also had permanent dual-chamber pacemakers, previously implanted for standard clinical indications, participated in the study. Mean age was 70.1 ± 6.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction of 54.8 ± 1.9%. Exercise duration increased in all 10 subjects, when paced in the BPAP mode compared with standard pacemaker programming, showing a mean increase of 117 s (26%, P = 0.0016). The algorithm could adjust HR at each 2 min interval. The majority of subjects (60%) had their atrial pacing rate increased an average of 20% at t = 2 min. In the remaining 40% of subjects, the algorithm instructed HR to be unchanged. In two subjects, the pacing rate was not increased until t = 6 min. In contrast, subjects programmed to DDDR experienced an average of 45% increase in atrial pacing rate at t = 2 min. In the post-treadmill recovery period, SBP was higher for subjects who underwent BPAP. This difference in SBP was most pronounced immediately post-treadmill and diminished as subjects progressed through the 30 min recovery period. Statistical significance was achieved at t = 0, 20, and 30 min post-treadmill.An increase in exercise duration was reported in HFpEF subjects using a pacing algorithm that modulated HR based on BP compared with standard programming. These encouraging results form the basis for a larger, randomized cross-over trial to confirm these initial observations, further characterize the safety, efficacy, and possible mechanisms of action in both acute and longer-term treatment.CONCLUSIONSAn increase in exercise duration was reported in HFpEF subjects using a pacing algorithm that modulated HR based on BP compared with standard programming. These encouraging results form the basis for a larger, randomized cross-over trial to confirm these initial observations, further characterize the safety, efficacy, and possible mechanisms of action in both acute and longer-term treatment.
Author Ellenbogen, Kenneth
Polosajian, Leo
Gang, Eli
Burnam, Michael
Develle, Robert
Nalbandian, Shakeh
AuthorAffiliation 1 BaroPace, Inc Issaquah WA USA
4 Cardiovascular Research Foundation Beverly Hills & Cedars‐Sinai Smidt Heart Institute Los Angeles CA USA
2 Cardiac Rhythm Specialists, Inc Los Angeles CA USA
3 Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond VA USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond VA USA
– name: 1 BaroPace, Inc Issaquah WA USA
– name: 4 Cardiovascular Research Foundation Beverly Hills & Cedars‐Sinai Smidt Heart Institute Los Angeles CA USA
– name: 2 Cardiac Rhythm Specialists, Inc Los Angeles CA USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Burnam
  fullname: Burnam, Michael
  organization: BaroPace, Inc
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Robert
  surname: Develle
  fullname: Develle, Robert
  organization: BaroPace, Inc
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Leo
  surname: Polosajian
  fullname: Polosajian, Leo
  organization: Cardiac Rhythm Specialists, Inc
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Shakeh
  surname: Nalbandian
  fullname: Nalbandian, Shakeh
  organization: Cardiac Rhythm Specialists, Inc
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kenneth
  surname: Ellenbogen
  fullname: Ellenbogen, Kenneth
  organization: Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Eli
  surname: Gang
  fullname: Gang, Eli
  email: gang@cvmg.com
  organization: Beverly Hills & Cedars‐Sinai Smidt Heart Institute
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38783689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu1DAUQCNUREvphg9AltigSlP8TDxsKlS1tFIlFsDasp3rqUeeONjJlOyQ-gN8I1-CZ6ZULQs2ft3j42v7vqz2uthBVb0m-IRgTN_DjaMnhEvBn1UHFAsxE5LSvUfj_eoo5yXGmIiaCMpfVPtMNpLVcn5Q3X3RDoYJ6a5F4Jy32k4oOqRb3Q9-DUgPyeuAem19t0AJFmPQA7TITMiEGFvUJ8h5TIDaMW2QEG9___wVYA0BwQ9I1mf4gHThYnQlsm1s7Cz0A8rD2E6vqudOhwxH9_1h9e3i_OvZ5ez686ers4_XM8sbzmeGMTwXjjApSCuF4Q3RlsvWcuY4KYk3rMGc85rWc1FmuClPYIzkxnFjSc0Oq6udt416qfrkVzpNKmqvtgsxLZROg7cBlKFCMGx4a63mugHNgQlOHbXlqDng4jrdufrRrKC10A1JhyfSp5HO36hFXCtCqGzKTYrh3b0hxe8j5EGtfLYQgu4gjlkxXGMmcUPmBX37D7qMY-rKWxVKCskxIxvhm8cpPeTy97MLcLwDbIo5J3APCMFqU0xqU0xqW0wFJjv41geY_kOq88sLutvzB8Taznc
Cites_doi 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.822627
10.1097/00008483‐200603000‐00007
10.1001/jama.2023.0675
10.1016/j.jchf.2018.03.003
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.632745
10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5320
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
– notice: 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1002/ehf2.14854
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Journals (Open Access)
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 5
  dbid: 7X7
  name: ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate Safety and efficacy of adaptive atrial pacing regulated by blood pressure during low‐level exercise: a proof‐of‐concept study
EISSN 2055-5822
EndPage 2463
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_b25530b4dcca4a7ea4e3542f2cf419e0
PMC11287330
38783689
10_1002_ehf2_14854
EHF214854
Genre shortCommunication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID 0R~
1OC
24P
53G
5VS
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAMMB
ABUWG
ACCMX
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADKYN
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AFKRA
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AOIJS
AVUZU
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
DIK
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
FYUFA
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
ITC
KQ8
M~E
OK1
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RPM
UKHRP
AAHHS
AAYXX
ACCFJ
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AIWBW
AJBDE
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
WIN
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4744-b33095f13851d85b471ac48dc43f41cac737044462695ac707205bb84bf4bc163
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2055-5822
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:23 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:33:52 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:47:59 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 07:16:37 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:54:33 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:23:21 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 06 04:45:34 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Exercise tolerance
HFpEF
Cardiac pacing
Chronotropic incompetence
Rate adaptive atrial pacing
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial
2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4744-b33095f13851d85b471ac48dc43f41cac737044462695ac707205bb84bf4bc163
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/b25530b4dcca4a7ea4e3542f2cf419e0
PMID 38783689
PQID 3085840310
PQPubID 4368362
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b25530b4dcca4a7ea4e3542f2cf419e0
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11287330
proquest_miscellaneous_3060380719
proquest_journals_3085840310
pubmed_primary_38783689
crossref_primary_10_1002_ehf2_14854
wiley_primary_10_1002_ehf2_14854_EHF214854
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2024
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2024
  text: August 2024
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle ESC Heart Failure
PublicationTitleAlternate ESC Heart Fail
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2018; 6
2009; 2
2023; 8
2023; 329
2006; 114
2006; 26
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
References_xml – volume: 114
  start-page: 2138
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2147
  article-title: Impaired chronotropic and vasodilator reserves limit exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 2
  start-page: 105
  year: 2009
  end-page: 112
  article-title: Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in a general population
  publication-title: Circ Heart Fail
– volume: 8
  start-page: 213
  year: 2023
  end-page: 221
  article-title: Effect of personalized accelerated pacing on quality of life, physical activity, and atrial fibrillation in patients with preclinical and overt heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the myPACE randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA Cardiol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 86
  year: 2006
  end-page: 89
  article-title: Chronotropic incompetence and its contribution to exercise intolerance in older heart failure patients
  publication-title: J Cardiopulm Rehabil
– volume: 6
  start-page: 665
  year: 2018
  end-page: 675
  article-title: Hemodynamic correlates and diagnostic role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
  publication-title: JACC Heart Fail
– volume: 329
  start-page: 801
  year: 2023
  end-page: 809
  article-title: Rate‐adaptive atrial pacing for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
  publication-title: JAMA
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.822627
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1097/00008483‐200603000‐00007
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0675
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.03.003
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.632745
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5320
SSID ssj0001561524
Score 2.264008
Snippet Aims Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This...
Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This study...
Aims Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited. This...
Abstract Aims Despite half of all heart failure patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), treatment options are limited....
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2460
SubjectTerms Aged
Algorithms
Blood pressure
Blood Pressure - physiology
Cardiac pacing
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods
Chronotropic incompetence
Conflicts of interest
Double-Blind Method
Ejection fraction
Exercise - physiology
Exercise Test
Exercise tolerance
Female
Fitness equipment
Heart Atria - physiopathology
Heart failure
Heart Failure - physiopathology
Heart Failure - rehabilitation
Heart Failure - therapy
Heart rate
Heart Rate - physiology
HFpEF
Humans
Hypertension
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemakers
Patients
Proof of Concept Study
Prospective Studies
Rate adaptive atrial pacing
Short Communication
Sinuses
Stroke Volume - physiology
Treatment Outcome
White people
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Ra9swEBZbB2UvZVvXNm03bqxPA9NYkmNlL2MrDWHQvayFvAnJPrWFYqdpQslbYX9gv7G_ZHeykzZ09MXEOYFl3-nuk3T6TogDTFNEqTDxZByJdjIknoB4QlgAU2WY0JwPCp_86g3P9M9RNmoX3G7atMqFT4yOuqwLXiM_VIQNaDJCaOTb-DrhqlG8u9qW0HgpXjF1GVt1Psof1lgIHGRSL1lJ5SFeBEnOwWR6JQ5Fuv7_YcynqZKPIWyMQYM3YqMFj_C90fZb8QKrd2L9pN0e3xR_fruA0zm4qgRkbghXzKEO4Eo3ZrcGLhbpAJonU8SCSVOHHkvwc4gZ7BDTYmcThOb4IlzVt_d3f684swgW1Zm-gqN2dR1IEi9Fc_QRIlXte3E2OD49GiZtlYWk0LnWiVeKYFYgxWRpaTJP0coV2pSFVkGn1NFc5UwqRzOffkZ33Vx2M--N9kH7guDcllir6gp3BJBzcD3fo6hIYomp8SXhz1gTy7hMdTvi8-Kb23FDpmEb2mRpWTM2aqYjfrA6li2YADv-UU_ObTuerJdc78jrkixQuxydRkWPCbKgTveRHrW_UKZtR-WNfbChjvi0FNN44k0SV2E94za9LpPwp_2O2G50v-yJMnzmxZDErFjFSldXJdXlReTsJlhrcsWf4Es0oGfe3x4PBzL-2n3-JfbEa0kQq0lH3Bdr08kMPxBEmvqPcRz8A5fKEw8
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Wiley Online Library Journals (Open Access)
  dbid: 24P
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1fixMxEB_OE8QX8b_VUyL6JCzXzZ9uKr6oXCnCiaAH9xaS3YknHLtHr0X6JvgF_Ix-EmeS7daiCL4s3U5K0kwm88vuzG8AnmNZIkqFRaDFUWgvYxEIiBeEBbBUlgnNOVH4-P1kfqLfnZrTPXi1yYXJ_BDDAze2jLRfs4H7cHm4JQ3FsyjJzq3RV-Aq59ZyQJ_UH7ZPWAgamFTVVo6NKQy5woGfVB5uf77jkRJx_9_Q5p9Bk7-D2eSNZjfhRg8jxeus91uwh-1tuHbcvyi_A98_-ojLtfBtI5BZIny9Fl0UvvEXvMEJn8p1CDoxk-8Si1yRHhsR1iLFsosUILtaoMiJjOK8-_rz249zjjESmzpNL4Wndl0XSZIudU6CFIm09i6czI4-vZ0Xfb2FotaV1kVQigBXJBWZsrEmkN_ytbZNrVXUJQ20UhXTy9EZaGroblzRxIZgdYg61ATs7sF-27X4AARtE34SJuQfSSyxtKEhJJqqY1lv1HgEzzZz7i4yrYbLBMrSsWZc0swI3rA6hhZMhZ2-6BafXW9ZLkiufBR0Q2tR-wq9RkXdRFnToKdIXR1slOl6-7x0ipAmHW0J247g6SAmy-LXJb7FbsVtJmOm4y-nI7ifdT-MRFnOfrEksTurYmeou5L2y1li7yaAayvFU_AiLaB__H93NJ_J9Onh_zR-BNclQa8cpngA-8vFCh8TdFqGJ8lCfgFlPhWE
  priority: 102
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
Title Safety and efficacy of adaptive atrial pacing regulated by blood pressure during low‐level exercise: a proof‐of‐concept study
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fehf2.14854
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38783689
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3085840310
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3060380719
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11287330
https://doaj.org/article/b25530b4dcca4a7ea4e3542f2cf419e0
Volume 11
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1fixMxEB_0BPFF_O_qWUb0SVium2S7qW-etBThjkM96FtIdifcwbF71Bbpm-AX8DP6SZwk29Ki6IsvS7cT2OzMJPMLO_MbgNdUFERCUu7YOXJlhc8dA_GcsQAVUgdC81AofHI6mp2rD_NyvtPqK-SEJXrgpLgjJ0JjG6cafpSyFVlFslTCi9qrYkzxtM4xb-cw1dcHc2BSWz5ScUQXXvC2oEu1F4EiUf-f0OXvSZK74DVGn-k9uNvDRnyXpnsfblD7AG6f9B_GH8L3T9bTco22bZACK4St19h5tI29Dhsa2tieA_mEzLEKF6kDPTXo1hhz1zEmxK4WhKlwEa-6rz-__bgKOUW46cv0Fi2P6zrPknipU9EjRpLaR3A-nXx-P8v7_gp5rSqlciclAyzPJimLRpeO45StlW5qJVm3PNFKVoFOjs8845LvhpUYls5p5bxyNQO5x3DQdi09BeRtwY7ciOMhiwUV2jWMPGM3LG3Zfhm82ujcXCcaDZMIk4UJljHRMhkcB3NsRwTq6_gHO4TpHcL8yyEyONwY0_Tr8YuRjCz5KMtYNoOXWzGvpPB5xLbUrcKY0TDQ7xfjDJ4k229nInWodtEs0XtesTfVfUl7eRHZuhnQ6koGFbyJDvSX9zeT2VTEX8_-hyaewx3BECylKx7CwXKxohcMoZZuADeFOuNrNa8GcOt4cnr2cRBX0C9Dkx-p
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtNAEB6VIkEviH8CBRYBFySr9nodb5AQ4qdRSpteaKXclt31mFaq7JAmqnJD4gV4Eh6KJ2FmHadEoN56iRLPKl7vzM58450fgBeYJIgyxciRcETKyjJyBMQjwgKYpJoLmnOi8HC_OzhUn0bZaA1-tbkwHFbZ6sSgqIva8zvyrZSwATkjhEbejr9F3DWKT1fbFhqNWOzi_IxcttM3Ox-Jvy-l7G8ffBhEi64CkVe5UpEjD76XlTSRLCl05kg7W6904VVaqsRbn6c5F1EjpN_L6FecyzhzTitXKucJvtD_XoGrZHhjdvbyUX7-TofASCbVsgqq3MKjUpIy0plasXuhPcD_MO2_oZl_Q-Zg8_o34cYCrIp3jXTdgjWsbsO14eI4_g78-GxLnM6FrQqBXIvC-rmoS2ELO2Y1KmxoCiLILycLKSZN33sshJuLEDEvQhjubIKiSZcUJ_XZ7-8_TziSSbTdoF4LS-PquiRK-PBNqqUIpXHvwuGlrP89WK_qCh-AIGVku65LVpjIEhPtCsK7oQeXtlkad-B5u-Zm3BTvME2ZZmmYMyZwpgPvmR3LEVxwO1yoJ1_NYv8aJ7m_klMFSbyyOVqFKd2mlJ4m3UO61WbLTLPQAqfmXGY78GxJpv3LhzK2wnrGY7oxF_1Peh243_B-OZNUc46NJopekYqVqa5SquOjUCOcYLTOU16CV0GALnh-sz3oy_Dt4cUP8RSuDw6Ge2ZvZ3_3EWxIgndNKOQmrE8nM3xM8GzqnoQ9IeDLZW_CP_dDTZg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3dbtMwFD4anTRxg_inMMAIuEGK2jhO4yIhxFirjrFqAibtzrMde0OaktK1mnqHxAvwPDwOT8I5TtJRgXa3myrNsRIn58ffic8PwAsXx87xxEUGhSMSmvvIIBCPEAu4OJFU0JwShffGvdGB-HCYHq7BryYXhsIqG5sYDHVeWvpG3kkQG6Azgmik4-uwiP3t4dvJt4g6SNFOa9NOoxKRXbc4R_ft7M3ONvL6JefDwZf3o6juMBBZkQkRGfTm-6nHSaVxLlODllpbIXMrEi9iq22WZFRQDVF_P8V_3Yx3U2OkMF4Yi1AGr3sN1jPyilqwvjUY73-6-MKD0CTlYlkTlXfciedommQqVlbB0Czgfwj330DNvwF0WAGHN-FGDV3Zu0rWbsGaK27Dxl69OX8HfnzW3s0WTBc5c1SZQtsFKz3TuZ6QUWU6tAhh6KXjesmm7phah7mcmQUL8fMsBOXOp45VyZPstDz__f3nKcU1saY31GumcVxZeqSEH1slXrJQKPcuHFwJB-5BqygL9wAYmibdMz1ck5HMXSxNjug3dOSSOk26bXjevHM1qUp5qKpoM1fEGRU404YtYsdyBJXfDifK6bGqtVkZTt2WjMhR_oXOnBYuwdt4bnHSfYe32myYqWqbcKYuJLgNz5Zk1GbaotGFK-c0ptelFgBxvw33K94vZ5JIyriRSJErUrEy1VVK8fUkVAxHUC2zhF7BqyBAlzy_GoyGPBw9vPwhnsIGKqD6uDPefQTXOWK9Ki5yE1qz6dw9Rqw2M09qpWBwdNV6-AcbxVMz
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety+and+efficacy+of+adaptive+atrial+pacing+regulated+by+blood+pressure+during+low%E2%80%90level+exercise%3A+a+proof%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90concept+study&rft.jtitle=ESC+Heart+Failure&rft.au=Burnam%2C+Michael&rft.au=Develle%2C+Robert&rft.au=Polosajian%2C+Leo&rft.au=Nalbandian%2C+Shakeh&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.issn=2055-5822&rft.eissn=2055-5822&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2460&rft.epage=2463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fehf2.14854&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_ehf2_14854
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2055-5822&client=summon