Inappropriate and potentially avoidable emergency department visits of Swiss nursing home residents and their resource use: a retrospective chart-review

• Published in: BMC geriatrics Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 659
• Main Authors: Zúñiga, Franziska, Gaertner, Katharina, Weber-Schuh, Sabine K., Löw, Barbara, Simon, Michael, Müller, Martin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 11.08.2022; BMC
• Subjects: Avoidable; Chronic illnesses; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Comorbidity; Diabetes; Elder care; Emergency departments; Emergency medical care; Family physicians; Geriatrics; Health care access; Health services utilization; Heart failure; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Inappropriate; Length of stay; Long-term care; Medical referrals; Morbidity; Nursing homes; Older people; Ostomy; Patients; Pneumonia; Public health; Urinary tract diseases; Urinary tract infections; Urogenital system; Switzerland
• ISSN: 1471-2318; 1471-2318
• DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03308-9

Abstract Background Emergency department (ED) visits for nursing home residents lead to higher morbidity and mortality. Therefore, inappropriate visits (for conditions treatable elsewhere) or potentially avoidable visits (those avoidable through adequate chronic care management) must be minimized. This study aimed to investigate factors and resource consumption patterns associated with inappropriate and potentially avoidable visits in a Swiss tertiary hospital. Methods This is a single-center retrospective chart review in an urban Swiss university hospital ED. A consecutive sample of 1276 visits by nursing home residents (≥ 65 years old), recorded between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017 (three calendar years) were included. Case characteristics were extracted from ED electronic documentation. Appropriateness was assessed via a structured Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol; potentially avoidable visits—measured as ambulatory-care sensitive conditions (ACSCs)—were analyzed separately. Inter-group differences concerning ED resource use were tested respectively with chi-square or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. To identify predictors of inappropriate or potentially-avoidable visits, we used multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results Six percent of visits were rated as inappropriate: they had lower triage levels (OR 0.55 [95%-CI 0.33-0.92], p= 0.024) and, compared to ambulance calls, they had higher odds of initiation via either patient-initiated walk-in (OR 3.42 [95%-CI 1.79-6.55], p≤ 0.001) or GP referrals (OR 2.13 [95%-CI 1.16-3.90], p= 0.015). For inappropriate visits, overall ED resource use was significantly lower (median 568 vs. 1403 tax points, p≤ 0.001). Of all visits included, 29% were due to (often potentially-avoidable) ACSCs. In those cases, compared to ambulance initiation, odds of being potentially-avoidable were considerably lower for walk-in patients (OR 0.46 [95%-CI 0.27-0.77], p= 0.004) but higher for GP referrals (OR 1.40 [95%-CI 1.00-1.94], p= 0.048). Nurse work (93 tax points vs. 64, p≤ 0.001) and laboratory resource use (334 tax points vs. 214, p≤ 0.001) were higher for potentially-avoidable ED visits. Conclusions We revealed substantial differences between the investigated groups. While nearly one third of ED visits from nursing homes were potentially avoidable, inappropriate visits were lower in numbers and not resource-intensive. Further research is required to differentiate potentially avoidable visits from inappropriate ones and to determine these findings’ public health implications.