The Effect of Age on Elbow Range of Motion in Pitchers

Abstract Background Alteration of elbow range of motion (ROM) has been observed in baseball pitchers. This study aims to compare dominant elbow ROM between early-puberty, late-puberty, and young-adult pitchers. Methods We recruited 62 pitchers, consisting of 17 early-puberty (mean age 13.1 years old...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysical therapy in sport Vol. 22; pp. 23 - 28
Main Authors Wang, Yu-Lin, Chang, Hsiao-Yun, Cheng, Shih-Chung, Liu, Chiang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2016
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Alteration of elbow range of motion (ROM) has been observed in baseball pitchers. This study aims to compare dominant elbow ROM between early-puberty, late-puberty, and young-adult pitchers. Methods We recruited 62 pitchers, consisting of 17 early-puberty (mean age 13.1 years old), 22 late-puberty (mean age 17.7 years old), and 23 young-adult players (mean age 19.4 years old). Dominant elbow ROMs were measured. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences in elbow ROM variables between 3 groups. Results Late-puberty pitchers exhibited a significantly lower elbow hyperextension and flexion than early-puberty or young-adult pitchers (P<.05). Valgus angle was significantly lower in young-adult (7.7°±5.5°) versus early-puberty (12.1°±2.3°) and late-puberty pitchers (13.0°±4.1°; P<0.05). Young-adult pitchers had the largest forearm supination range (101.2°±18.1°), followed by early-puberty (82.5°±6.5°; P<.05) and late-puberty pitchers (70.6°±15.8°). Elbow flexion-hyperextension total range was smallest in late-puberty pitchers (130.3°±7.4°), followed by young-adult (142.6°±9.3°) and early-puberty pitchers (144.6°±8.3°; P<.05). Forearm pronation-supination total range was also smallest in late-puberty pitchers (142.0°±20.3°), followed by early-puberty (159.8°±9.5°) and young-adult pitchers (177.2°±20.8°; P<.05). Conclusions These results indicate that careful monitoring of the elbow and forearm range of motion should be undertaken in adolescent baseball pitchers to prevent and or minimize injury risk.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1466-853X
1873-1600
DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.05.005