The Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Yield a More Accurate Prognoses Than the RECIST 1.1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization
The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarteria...
Saved in:
Published in | Gut and liver Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 765 - 774 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
01.11.2020
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1976-2283 2005-1212 2005-1212 |
DOI | 10.5009/gnl19197 |
Cover
Abstract | The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE).
In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion.
The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05).
Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE).
In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion.
The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05).
Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE. Background/Aims: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Methods: In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion. Results: The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE. KCI Citation Count: 6 Background/Aims: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Methods: In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion. Results: The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE).Background/AimsThe Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE).In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion.MethodsIn total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion.The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05).ResultsThe median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05).Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE.ConclusionsResponse evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE. |
Author | Kim, Do Young Park, Mi-Suk Lee, Jae Seung Baek, Song-Ee Kim, Seung Up Park, Jun Yong Kim, Myeong-Jin Ahn, Sang Hoon Kim, Beom Kyung Chung, Yong Eun Rhee, Hyungjin Choi, Hong Jun Han, Kwang-Hyub |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 2 Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea 4 Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 3 Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea – name: 4 Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – name: 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – name: 3 Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jae Seung orcidid: 0000-0002-2371-0967 surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Jae Seung organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Hong Jun orcidid: 0000-0002-3753-4343 surname: Choi fullname: Choi, Hong Jun organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Beom Kyung orcidid: 0000-0002-5363-2496 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Beom Kyung organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Jun Yong orcidid: 0000-0001-6324-2224 surname: Park fullname: Park, Jun Yong organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Do Young orcidid: 0000-0002-8327-3439 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Do Young organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 6 givenname: Sang Hoon orcidid: 0000-0002-3629-4624 surname: Ahn fullname: Ahn, Sang Hoon organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 7 givenname: Kwang-Hyub orcidid: 0000-0003-3960-6539 surname: Han fullname: Han, Kwang-Hyub organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 8 givenname: Song-Ee orcidid: 0000-0001-8146-2570 surname: Baek fullname: Baek, Song-Ee organization: Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 9 givenname: Yong Eun orcidid: 0000-0003-0811-9578 surname: Chung fullname: Chung, Yong Eun organization: Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 10 givenname: Mi-Suk orcidid: 0000-0001-5817-2444 surname: Park fullname: Park, Mi-Suk organization: Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 11 givenname: Myeong-Jin orcidid: 0000-0001-7949-5402 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Myeong-Jin organization: Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 12 givenname: Hyungjin orcidid: 0000-0001-7759-4458 surname: Rhee fullname: Rhee, Hyungjin organization: Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 13 givenname: Seung Up orcidid: 0000-0002-9658-8050 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Seung Up organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002647109$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNplkt9u0zAUxiM0xLqBxBMgX24XLbYT588NUlUVVmkI1IULrqwT56T1ltqdnQzBy_FqOOk6mLiyfPyd3_fZPmfRibEGo-gtozNBafF-Y1pWsCJ7EU04pWLKOOMn0SRU0inneXwanXl_S2nKeCZeRacxp4LGLJ5Ev8stks-21o3GmqzR763xSJYP0PbQaWvIwukOnQaiDbmxra5J2e-s8-RivVysbspL8l1jWxMIGIdkrlTvoEPy1dmNsR49KbdgSBd8Dg2EzdgAu8I9dFZh2_YtOLIAp7SxOyClwwCoyQ_dbcMGjAc3RmjJGmptcVeFHL_GeK-jlw20Ht88rufRt4_LcnE1vf7yabWYX09VkvFuCmmTVAlLc55T1eSxyCGjDTZAi5RCqmohuKgqUVFGM-SQVzWvM8UZFTFWPInPo8sD17hG3iktLehx3Vh55-R8Xa5kQIk8zYN2ddDWFm7l3ukduJ9jw1iwbiPDhbRqUVYYkhVNUbFEJHGaAEuKoql5miAOuMD6cGDt-2qHtULTOWifQZ-fGL0NmR5klqZZEQ-Ai0eAs_c9-k7utB8eHQza3kseiySLRUGH3O_-9XoyOU5LEMwOAuWs9w4bqXQ3fkOw1q1kVA7jKI_j-Nf8qeHI_E_6B5fX4Ow |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2147_JHC_S351077 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_022_05920_8 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_21_26485 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jceh_2023_101342 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16213610 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_08944_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03095_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07357_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000001383 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_11253_x crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000002663 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_887653 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2023_02_006 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_15355 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2023_11_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_025_07185_3 crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000004128 crossref_primary_10_1111_liv_15923 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_025_01992_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines12061302 crossref_primary_10_1002_cac2_12414 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10045_z crossref_primary_10_3389_fradi_2024_1346550 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13082188 crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl20324 crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2024_12486 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_022_08732_4 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.049 10.1371/journal.pone.0077472 10.3350/cmh.2018.0090 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.06.027 10.5009/gnl14460 10.1002/hep.21980 10.3109/03009734.2012.729104 10.1002/hep.29480 10.1002/hep.27304 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO;2-6 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2721 10.1093/jnci/djn134 10.1016/j.cld.2015.01.001 10.3892/ol.2013.1612 10.1055/s-0034-1394142 10.3350/cmh.2017.0004 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02241.x 10.1007/s12072-014-9533-9 10.1002/hep.26487 10.1007/s00270-007-9064-z 10.1002/hep.23944 10.1002/hep.24451 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.022 10.5009/gnl19024 10.1055/s-0030-1247132 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 10.1586/17474124.2015.959929 10.3350/cmh.2016.0015 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.022 10.1111/jgh.13334 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.006 10.1159/000355948 10.2214/AJR.17.17993 10.1111/liv.13731 10.1002/hep.26014 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2020 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA ACYCR |
DOI | 10.5009/gnl19197 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2005-1212 |
EndPage | 774 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9605868 oai_doaj_org_article_bea6f9f9b1454364a1499fd264ee9605 PMC7667935 32050313 10_5009_gnl19197 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 5-W 8JR 9ZL AAKDD AAYXX ABDBF ACUHS ACYCR ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EF. F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE HZB OK1 RPM M~E NPM 7X8 5PM 53G |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-a6f4b4168280cf8358a70fefa0960a6cd5525bb5b0107e2a8bd2d7c21053eb243 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1976-2283 2005-1212 |
IngestDate | Sun Mar 09 07:51:37 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 27 01:24:52 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:31:21 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:14:21 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:59:30 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:42:51 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:02 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | Carcinoma, hepatocellular Treatment outcome Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Radiotherapy Embolization, therapeutics |
Language | English |
License | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c472t-a6f4b4168280cf8358a70fefa0960a6cd5525bb5b0107e2a8bd2d7c21053eb243 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Jae Seung Lee and Hong Jun Choi contributed equally to this work as first authors. |
ORCID | 0000-0002-3753-4343 0000-0003-3960-6539 0000-0003-0811-9578 0000-0001-8146-2570 0000-0001-5817-2444 0000-0002-2371-0967 0000-0001-7949-5402 0000-0001-6324-2224 0000-0002-9658-8050 0000-0002-5363-2496 0000-0002-3629-4624 0000-0002-8327-3439 0000-0001-7759-4458 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/bea6f9f9b1454364a1499fd264ee9605 |
PMID | 32050313 |
PQID | 2354735908 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9605868 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bea6f9f9b1454364a1499fd264ee9605 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7667935 proquest_miscellaneous_2354735908 pubmed_primary_32050313 crossref_citationtrail_10_5009_gnl19197 crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl19197 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: 2020-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Gut and liver |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gut Liver |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Editorial Office of Gut and Liver Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver – name: Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver – name: 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 |
References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.049 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077472 – ident: ref3 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.3350/cmh.2018.0090 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.06.027 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.5009/gnl14460 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1002/hep.21980 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.729104 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1002/hep.29480 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1002/hep.27304 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO;2-6 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2721 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn134 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2015.01.001 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1612 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394142 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.3350/cmh.2017.0004 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02241.x – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9533-9 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1002/hep.26487 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9064-z – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1002/hep.23944 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1002/hep.24451 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.022 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.5009/gnl19024 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.959929 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.3350/cmh.2016.0015 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.022 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1111/jgh.13334 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.006 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1159/000355948 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17993 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1111/liv.13731 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1002/hep.26014 |
SSID | ssj0061275 |
Score | 2.3691483 |
Snippet | The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for... Background/Aims: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment... |
SourceID | nrf doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 765 |
SubjectTerms | carcinoma embolization hepatocellular Original radiotherapy response evaluation criteria in solid tumors therapeutics treatment outcome 내과학 |
Title | The Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Yield a More Accurate Prognoses Than the RECIST 1.1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050313 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2354735908 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7667935 https://doaj.org/article/bea6f9f9b1454364a1499fd264ee9605 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002647109 |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Gut and Liver, 2020, 14(6), , pp.765-774 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9tAEF5KDqWX0nedPpiWQtuDGlnS7krH1Dg4BZfiOJCexL6UiNjaItu_r3-tMyvZ2CXQS08GayVGmlnN92lnv2HsA4JkrqTC-a21iLJh7iJltYyUSbnKY6sSSZuTp9_F5DL7dsWv9lp9UU1YJw_cPbgT7ZSoiqrQw4xnqcgUQvqispjHnUP0HdRL4yLekqnuHSxItjysJ0sRkcBLJzvLEVCcXDcL5Cgk8rSXiIJeP6aXpq3ugpp_V0zupaCzR-xhjx3htLP5Mbvnmifs_rRfHX_KfqPPYeptXSGuhFlX_epgvBP0BmpsQCEHdQMXflFbmG-Wvl3Bp9l4dH4x_ww_qaINFF6mdXBqzIakJOBH66kgz61gfqMaQNAI3Qkw_DKki00wq609rQJQWSuMqENR45cK5gRK0Rr63gshMYYiUox6mClbe7fUftHvBX3GLs_G89Ek6hs0RCaTyTpCz2QaER2ytthUiOVyJePKVYp4kRLGcp5wrblG0iddonJtEysNskyeIqPP0ufsqPGNe8kgVkVmFTdWpjZLYlvonKiPkYnTIpXpgH3ceqs0vXo5NdFYlMhiyK_l1q8D9m438len2HHHmK_k8N1x0tgOf2DklX3klf-KvAF7j-FS3po6nE-_1768bUtkIucljchFjtZso6nEiUt-UI3zm1WZpKHtcxHjmBdddO3sSROS6RniXcuDuDsw-PBIU98EcXApBL5y-fH_uMNX7EFCnxfC1svX7GjdbtwbxGBr_TZMtz-1MjB8 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Modified+Response+Evaluation+Criteria+in+Solid+Tumors+%28RECIST%29+Yield+a+More+Accurate+Prognoses+Than+the+RECIST+1.1+in+Hepatocellular+Carcinoma+Treated+with+Transarterial+Radioembolization&rft.jtitle=Gut+and+liver&rft.au=Lee%2C+Jae+Seung&rft.au=Choi%2C+Hong+Jun&rft.au=Kim%2C+Beom+Kyung&rft.au=Park%2C+Jun+Yong&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.issn=2005-1212&rft.eissn=2005-1212&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=765&rft_id=info:doi/10.5009%2Fgnl19197&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon |