The Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Yield a More Accurate Prognoses Than the RECIST 1.1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization

The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarteria...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut and liver Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 765 - 774
Main Authors Lee, Jae Seung, Choi, Hong Jun, Kim, Beom Kyung, Park, Jun Yong, Kim, Do Young, Ahn, Sang Hoon, Han, Kwang-Hyub, Baek, Song-Ee, Chung, Yong Eun, Park, Mi-Suk, Kim, Myeong-Jin, Rhee, Hyungjin, Kim, Seung Up
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 01.11.2020
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver
거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1976-2283
2005-1212
2005-1212
DOI10.5009/gnl19197

Cover

Abstract The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE). In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion. The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05). Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE.
AbstractList The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE). In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion. The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05). Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE.
Background/Aims: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Methods: In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion. Results: The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE. KCI Citation Count: 6
Background/Aims: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Methods: In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion. Results: The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE.
The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE).Background/AimsThe Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated which criteria provides better survival predictions in HCC patients treated with transarterial radioembolization (TARE).In total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion.MethodsIn total, 102 patients with unresectable intrahepatic HCC, who were treated with TARE between 2012 and 2017, were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response after TARE was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months by the mRECIST and RECIST 1.1. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial responses by each criterion.The median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05).ResultsThe median age of 83 men and 19 women was 64.3 years. The median alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels were 37.1 ng/mL and 1,780.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The median maximal tumor size was 8.3 cm, and multiple tumors were observed in 36 patients (35.3%). During the follow-up period (median, 20.7 months), 21 patients (20.6%) died, with a mean survival time of 55.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was 96.1% at 6 months and 89.3% at 12 months. Responders, defined by the mRECIST at 1, 3, and 6 months after TARE, showed better survival outcomes than nonresponders (hazard ratio [HR]=5.736, p=0.008 at 1 month; HR=3.145, p=0.022 at 3 months, and HR=2.887, p=0.061 at 6 months). The survival rates of responders and nonresponders defined by the RECIST 1.1 were similar (all p>0.05).Response evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE.ConclusionsResponse evaluations that use the mRECIST provide more accurate prognoses than those that use the RECIST 1.1 in HCC patients treated with TARE.
Author Kim, Do Young
Park, Mi-Suk
Lee, Jae Seung
Baek, Song-Ee
Kim, Seung Up
Park, Jun Yong
Kim, Myeong-Jin
Ahn, Sang Hoon
Kim, Beom Kyung
Chung, Yong Eun
Rhee, Hyungjin
Choi, Hong Jun
Han, Kwang-Hyub
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
4 Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
3 Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
– name: 4 Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– name: 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– name: 3 Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jae Seung
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2371-0967
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Jae Seung
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hong Jun
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3753-4343
  surname: Choi
  fullname: Choi, Hong Jun
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Beom Kyung
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5363-2496
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Beom Kyung
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jun Yong
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6324-2224
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Jun Yong
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Do Young
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8327-3439
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Do Young
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Sang Hoon
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3629-4624
  surname: Ahn
  fullname: Ahn, Sang Hoon
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Kwang-Hyub
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3960-6539
  surname: Han
  fullname: Han, Kwang-Hyub
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Song-Ee
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8146-2570
  surname: Baek
  fullname: Baek, Song-Ee
  organization: Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Yong Eun
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0811-9578
  surname: Chung
  fullname: Chung, Yong Eun
  organization: Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Mi-Suk
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5817-2444
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Mi-Suk
  organization: Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Myeong-Jin
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7949-5402
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Myeong-Jin
  organization: Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Hyungjin
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7759-4458
  surname: Rhee
  fullname: Rhee, Hyungjin
  organization: Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Seung Up
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9658-8050
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Seung Up
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002647109$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNplkt9u0zAUxiM0xLqBxBMgX24XLbYT588NUlUVVmkI1IULrqwT56T1ltqdnQzBy_FqOOk6mLiyfPyd3_fZPmfRibEGo-gtozNBafF-Y1pWsCJ7EU04pWLKOOMn0SRU0inneXwanXl_S2nKeCZeRacxp4LGLJ5Ev8stks-21o3GmqzR763xSJYP0PbQaWvIwukOnQaiDbmxra5J2e-s8-RivVysbspL8l1jWxMIGIdkrlTvoEPy1dmNsR49KbdgSBd8Dg2EzdgAu8I9dFZh2_YtOLIAp7SxOyClwwCoyQ_dbcMGjAc3RmjJGmptcVeFHL_GeK-jlw20Ht88rufRt4_LcnE1vf7yabWYX09VkvFuCmmTVAlLc55T1eSxyCGjDTZAi5RCqmohuKgqUVFGM-SQVzWvM8UZFTFWPInPo8sD17hG3iktLehx3Vh55-R8Xa5kQIk8zYN2ddDWFm7l3ukduJ9jw1iwbiPDhbRqUVYYkhVNUbFEJHGaAEuKoql5miAOuMD6cGDt-2qHtULTOWifQZ-fGL0NmR5klqZZEQ-Ai0eAs_c9-k7utB8eHQza3kseiySLRUGH3O_-9XoyOU5LEMwOAuWs9w4bqXQ3fkOw1q1kVA7jKI_j-Nf8qeHI_E_6B5fX4Ow
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2147_JHC_S351077
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_022_05920_8
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_21_26485
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jceh_2023_101342
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16213610
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_08944_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_021_03095_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07357_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000001383
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_11253_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000002663
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_887653
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2023_02_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_15355
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2023_11_007
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_025_07185_3
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000004128
crossref_primary_10_1111_liv_15923
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_025_01992_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines12061302
crossref_primary_10_1002_cac2_12414
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10045_z
crossref_primary_10_3389_fradi_2024_1346550
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13082188
crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl20324
crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2024_12486
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_022_08732_4
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.049
10.1371/journal.pone.0077472
10.3350/cmh.2018.0090
10.1016/j.jvir.2018.06.027
10.5009/gnl14460
10.1002/hep.21980
10.3109/03009734.2012.729104
10.1002/hep.29480
10.1002/hep.27304
10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO;2-6
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2721
10.1093/jnci/djn134
10.1016/j.cld.2015.01.001
10.3892/ol.2013.1612
10.1055/s-0034-1394142
10.3350/cmh.2017.0004
10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02241.x
10.1007/s12072-014-9533-9
10.1002/hep.26487
10.1007/s00270-007-9064-z
10.1002/hep.23944
10.1002/hep.24451
10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.022
10.5009/gnl19024
10.1055/s-0030-1247132
10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
10.1586/17474124.2015.959929
10.3350/cmh.2016.0015
10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.022
10.1111/jgh.13334
10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.006
10.1159/000355948
10.2214/AJR.17.17993
10.1111/liv.13731
10.1002/hep.26014
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2020
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
ACYCR
DOI 10.5009/gnl19197
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed


MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2005-1212
EndPage 774
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9605868
oai_doaj_org_article_bea6f9f9b1454364a1499fd264ee9605
PMC7667935
32050313
10_5009_gnl19197
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
5-W
8JR
9ZL
AAKDD
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
ACYCR
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EF.
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
HZB
OK1
RPM
M~E
NPM
7X8
5PM
53G
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-a6f4b4168280cf8358a70fefa0960a6cd5525bb5b0107e2a8bd2d7c21053eb243
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1976-2283
2005-1212
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:51:37 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 27 01:24:52 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:31:21 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:14:21 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:59:30 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:42:51 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:02 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Carcinoma, hepatocellular
Treatment outcome
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Radiotherapy
Embolization, therapeutics
Language English
License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c472t-a6f4b4168280cf8358a70fefa0960a6cd5525bb5b0107e2a8bd2d7c21053eb243
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Jae Seung Lee and Hong Jun Choi contributed equally to this work as first authors.
ORCID 0000-0002-3753-4343
0000-0003-3960-6539
0000-0003-0811-9578
0000-0001-8146-2570
0000-0001-5817-2444
0000-0002-2371-0967
0000-0001-7949-5402
0000-0001-6324-2224
0000-0002-9658-8050
0000-0002-5363-2496
0000-0002-3629-4624
0000-0002-8327-3439
0000-0001-7759-4458
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/bea6f9f9b1454364a1499fd264ee9605
PMID 32050313
PQID 2354735908
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9605868
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bea6f9f9b1454364a1499fd264ee9605
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7667935
proquest_miscellaneous_2354735908
pubmed_primary_32050313
crossref_citationtrail_10_5009_gnl19197
crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl19197
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Gut and liver
PublicationTitleAlternate Gut Liver
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver
거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
Publisher_xml – name: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
– name: Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver
– name: 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
References ref13
ref35
ref12
ref34
ref15
ref37
ref14
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref11
ref33
ref10
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
References_xml – ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.049
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077472
– ident: ref3
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.3350/cmh.2018.0090
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.06.027
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.5009/gnl14460
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1002/hep.21980
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.729104
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1002/hep.29480
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1002/hep.27304
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO;2-6
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2721
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn134
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2015.01.001
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1612
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394142
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.3350/cmh.2017.0004
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02241.x
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9533-9
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1002/hep.26487
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9064-z
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1002/hep.23944
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1002/hep.24451
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.022
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.5009/gnl19024
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.959929
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.3350/cmh.2016.0015
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.022
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1111/jgh.13334
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.006
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1159/000355948
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17993
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1111/liv.13731
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1002/hep.26014
SSID ssj0061275
Score 2.3691483
Snippet The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment responses for...
Background/Aims: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria have been used to assess treatment...
SourceID nrf
doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 765
SubjectTerms carcinoma
embolization
hepatocellular
Original
radiotherapy
response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
therapeutics
treatment outcome
내과학
Title The Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Yield a More Accurate Prognoses Than the RECIST 1.1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050313
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2354735908
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7667935
https://doaj.org/article/bea6f9f9b1454364a1499fd264ee9605
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002647109
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Gut and Liver, 2020, 14(6), , pp.765-774
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9tAEF5KDqWX0nedPpiWQtuDGlnS7krH1Dg4BZfiOJCexL6UiNjaItu_r3-tMyvZ2CXQS08GayVGmlnN92lnv2HsA4JkrqTC-a21iLJh7iJltYyUSbnKY6sSSZuTp9_F5DL7dsWv9lp9UU1YJw_cPbgT7ZSoiqrQw4xnqcgUQvqispjHnUP0HdRL4yLekqnuHSxItjysJ0sRkcBLJzvLEVCcXDcL5Cgk8rSXiIJeP6aXpq3ugpp_V0zupaCzR-xhjx3htLP5Mbvnmifs_rRfHX_KfqPPYeptXSGuhFlX_epgvBP0BmpsQCEHdQMXflFbmG-Wvl3Bp9l4dH4x_ww_qaINFF6mdXBqzIakJOBH66kgz61gfqMaQNAI3Qkw_DKki00wq609rQJQWSuMqENR45cK5gRK0Rr63gshMYYiUox6mClbe7fUftHvBX3GLs_G89Ek6hs0RCaTyTpCz2QaER2ytthUiOVyJePKVYp4kRLGcp5wrblG0iddonJtEysNskyeIqPP0ufsqPGNe8kgVkVmFTdWpjZLYlvonKiPkYnTIpXpgH3ceqs0vXo5NdFYlMhiyK_l1q8D9m438len2HHHmK_k8N1x0tgOf2DklX3klf-KvAF7j-FS3po6nE-_1768bUtkIucljchFjtZso6nEiUt-UI3zm1WZpKHtcxHjmBdddO3sSROS6RniXcuDuDsw-PBIU98EcXApBL5y-fH_uMNX7EFCnxfC1svX7GjdbtwbxGBr_TZMtz-1MjB8
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Modified+Response+Evaluation+Criteria+in+Solid+Tumors+%28RECIST%29+Yield+a+More+Accurate+Prognoses+Than+the+RECIST+1.1+in+Hepatocellular+Carcinoma+Treated+with+Transarterial+Radioembolization&rft.jtitle=Gut+and+liver&rft.au=Lee%2C+Jae+Seung&rft.au=Choi%2C+Hong+Jun&rft.au=Kim%2C+Beom+Kyung&rft.au=Park%2C+Jun+Yong&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.issn=2005-1212&rft.eissn=2005-1212&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=765&rft_id=info:doi/10.5009%2Fgnl19197&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon