Comparison of cervical range of motion in two seated postural conditions in adults 50 or older with cervical pain
Objectives: The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated. Methods: Individuals 50 or older with c...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 33 - 39 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Taylor & Francis
01.02.2013
Maney Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives: The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated.
Methods: Individuals 50 or older with chronic neck pain participated in this within-subject observational study. ROM and posture (sagittal distances from the nose to the occiput, C7, and thoracic width and relative to a projected laser plumb line) were measured with the CROM device in the two postures. Test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC
95
) were calculated.
Results: Total planar ROM values were significantly different between HAB and ER postures. Extension, total rotation and lateral flexion, and R lateral flexion ROM were greater, while flexion decreased significantly in the ER posture. SEM% ranged from 4·0 to 9·5% and MDC
95
values were lower in ER (5·8-11·6°) compared to HAB (6·6-17·7°). MDC
95
% was moderately low for both postures (11·2-26·2%).
Discussion: ROM was significantly different between HAB and ER postures. The directions most likely to detect real change in neck mobility were rotation in both postures, and extension as well as total flexion/extension in ER. Flexion and lateral flexion should be regarded cautiously as measures of improvement. Erect posture maximizes available cervical ROM in individuals over 50 with chronic neck pain compared to habitual postures. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objectives: The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated.
Methods: Individuals 50 or older with chronic neck pain participated in this within-subject observational study. ROM and posture (sagittal distances from the nose to the occiput, C7, and thoracic width and relative to a projected laser plumb line) were measured with the CROM device in the two postures. Test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC
95
) were calculated.
Results: Total planar ROM values were significantly different between HAB and ER postures. Extension, total rotation and lateral flexion, and R lateral flexion ROM were greater, while flexion decreased significantly in the ER posture. SEM% ranged from 4·0 to 9·5% and MDC
95
values were lower in ER (5·8-11·6°) compared to HAB (6·6-17·7°). MDC
95
% was moderately low for both postures (11·2-26·2%).
Discussion: ROM was significantly different between HAB and ER postures. The directions most likely to detect real change in neck mobility were rotation in both postures, and extension as well as total flexion/extension in ER. Flexion and lateral flexion should be regarded cautiously as measures of improvement. Erect posture maximizes available cervical ROM in individuals over 50 with chronic neck pain compared to habitual postures. The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated. Individuals 50 or older with chronic neck pain participated in this within-subject observational study. ROM and posture (sagittal distances from the nose to the occiput, C7, and thoracic width and relative to a projected laser plumb line) were measured with the CROM device in the two postures. Test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) were calculated. Total planar ROM values were significantly different between HAB and ER postures. Extension, total rotation and lateral flexion, and R lateral flexion ROM were greater, while flexion decreased significantly in the ER posture. SEM% ranged from 4.0 to 9.5% and MDC95 values were lower in ER (5.8-11.6°) compared to HAB (6.6-17.7°). MDC95% was moderately low for both postures (11.2-26.2%). ROM was significantly different between HAB and ER postures. The directions most likely to detect real change in neck mobility were rotation in both postures, and extension as well as total flexion/extension in ER. Flexion and lateral flexion should be regarded cautiously as measures of improvement. Erect posture maximizes available cervical ROM in individuals over 50 with chronic neck pain compared to habitual postures. OBJECTIVESThe influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated. METHODSIndividuals 50 or older with chronic neck pain participated in this within-subject observational study. ROM and posture (sagittal distances from the nose to the occiput, C7, and thoracic width and relative to a projected laser plumb line) were measured with the CROM device in the two postures. Test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) were calculated. RESULTSTotal planar ROM values were significantly different between HAB and ER postures. Extension, total rotation and lateral flexion, and R lateral flexion ROM were greater, while flexion decreased significantly in the ER posture. SEM% ranged from 4.0 to 9.5% and MDC95 values were lower in ER (5.8-11.6°) compared to HAB (6.6-17.7°). MDC95% was moderately low for both postures (11.2-26.2%). DISCUSSIONROM was significantly different between HAB and ER postures. The directions most likely to detect real change in neck mobility were rotation in both postures, and extension as well as total flexion/extension in ER. Flexion and lateral flexion should be regarded cautiously as measures of improvement. Erect posture maximizes available cervical ROM in individuals over 50 with chronic neck pain compared to habitual postures. |
Author | Goldberg, Allon Dunleavy, Kim |
AuthorAffiliation | Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kim surname: Dunleavy fullname: Dunleavy, Kim email: ad6611@wayne.edu, dunleavy.kim@gmail.com organization: Wayne State UniversityDetroit – sequence: 2 givenname: Allon surname: Goldberg fullname: Goldberg, Allon organization: Wayne State UniversityDetroit |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24421611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkUtr3DAUhUVJaSZp_0LQshsnupYsyZtCGPqCQDftoiuh0SNRsSVHkjPk39dmpkm6ijYXdL57zoVzhk5iig6hCyCXAKK_aglrOUgO7e9Lcnwg3qDNKjSrcoI2QDhvegniFJ2V8mdBJCPyHTptGWuBA2zQ_TaNk86hpIiTx8blh2D0gLOOt279GVMNixYirvuEi9PVWTylUue8YCZFG1agrIS281AL7ghOGafBuoz3od49u046xPforddDcR-O8xz9-vL55_Zbc_Pj6_ft9U1jmGhrI0Snqex7MOANcQK8J9IbCqa1gnXWEeM1o5YbbaxnljO685ZRkNYC3XF6jj4dfKd5NzprXKzLxWrKYdT5USUd1P9KDHfqNj0o2gkJPV0MPh4NcrqfXalqDMW4YdDRpbkoYD0RXPJuzeIH1ORUSnb-KQaIWvtSL_pSz30tixcvj3xa-1fQAlwfgBB9yqPepzxYVfXjkLJfSjKhKPpKyF9-WKme |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_s21093297 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmpt_2017_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msksp_2018_09_013 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_28_274 crossref_primary_10_1179_2042618614Y_0000000070 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_023_02285_2 crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2022_11_1_97 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtumed_2018_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_2055668318777984 crossref_primary_10_25048_tudod_852027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physio_2015_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jelekin_2021_102591 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msksp_2018_11_013 crossref_primary_10_13066_kspm_2021_16_3_55 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10439_024_03517_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humov_2020_102633 crossref_primary_10_1080_10255842_2018_1479745 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0036_1579551 crossref_primary_10_18857_jkpt_2017_29_4_153 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.005 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00005 10.1097/01.BRS.0000103944.10408.BA 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.12.005 10.1080/00140139.2010.544765 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90176-9 10.2519/jospt.1992.15.3.147 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242 10.2519/jospt.2008.0303 10.2519/jospt.1993.17.3.155 10.1093/ptj/81.3.903 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.002 10.1007/s00586-008-0626-9 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00043-6 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816044e8 10.1097/00007632-199406000-00001 10.2519/jospt.2008.2680 10.1016/j.math.2004.07.004 10.2106/00004623-200210000-00021 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126 10.2522/ptj.20060009 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180 10.1016/j.math.2011.08.007 10.1186/1471-2474-7-58 10.1093/ptj/71.2.98 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00009 10.2519/jospt.2009.2933 10.1093/ptj/72.11.770 10.3233/BMR-1999-12304 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00334-7 10.1016/j.math.2009.06.002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2013 2013 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2013 2013 |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000017 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Physical Therapy |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Comparison of cervical ROM in two seated postural conditions |
EISSN | 2042-6186 |
EndPage | 39 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1179_2042618612Y_0000000017 24421611 11720959 |
Genre | Original Articles Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 002 0BK 0R~ 1~B 29K 36B 4.4 53G AAJNR AALUX AAMIU AAPUL AAQRR AAWTL ABBKH ABEIZ ABJNI ABLCE ABPTK ABUPF ABXYU ACENM ACGFS ACKLR ACLSK ACVOX ADBBV ADCVX ADFCX AECIN AFWLO AGDLA AGFJD AGRBW AGYJP AIJEM AIRBT AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AOIJS ARJSQ BAWUL BLEHA BOHLJ CCCUG D-I DIK DXH E01 E3Z EBS EJD ESX F5P HCLVR HYE HZ~ KYCEM M4Z O9- OK1 P76 P7B RNANH RPM RVRKI TFL TFW TR2 YCJ .GJ 04C 1KJ 2QV AADGC AAQQT AAXYE ABDBF ABGNL ABLIJ ACIEZ ACKFH ACWGZ ADOJX ADPSL ADVEQ AEIQB AETHL AFLJA AGXXK AIKPT ALYBC APIUT B0M BMSDO BTKSN COGVJ EAP EAS EBD ECF ECT EHN EIHBH EMK ENC EPT H13 HAMGP IPNFZ LJTGL M46 NPM NUSFT Q~Q RIG SJN TBQAZ TDBHL TERGH TUROJ TUS VQP WQ9 ~8M AAYXX AELXL AEXKJ CITATION 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-775a38991c1fc0e71ff08fc31c2d745de0cfa43d6cacdf4d643bfd4318dd13b63 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1066-9817 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 20:51:09 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 22:49:27 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 23:45:03 EST 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:53:17 EDT 2024 Sun Dec 17 03:35:17 EST 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Postural assessment Cervical range of motion Minimum detectable change Cervical pain Postural correction |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c472t-775a38991c1fc0e71ff08fc31c2d745de0cfa43d6cacdf4d643bfd4318dd13b63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3578193?pdf=render |
PMID | 24421611 |
PQID | 1490768656 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3578193 crossref_primary_10_1179_2042618612Y_0000000017 pubmed_primary_24421611 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1179_2042618612Y_0000000017 proquest_miscellaneous_1490768656 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20130201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 2 year: 2013 text: 20130201 day: 1 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Suite 1C, Joseph's Well, Hanover Walk, Leeds LS3 1AB, UK |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Man Manip Ther |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Maney Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis – name: Maney Publishing |
References | 8923628 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Nov 1;21(21):2435-42 16676874 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;36(4):242-8 19643658 - Man Ther. 2010 Feb;15(1):54-60 9310902 - J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Sep;20(7):468-75 1409874 - Phys Ther. 1992 Nov;72(11):770-80 8472080 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993 Mar;17(3):155-60 12377921 - J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84-A(10):1872-81 8066508 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 15;19(12):1307-9 17341512 - Phys Ther. 2007 Apr;87(4):408-17 15681268 - Man Ther. 2005 Feb;10(1):44-51 14699273 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jan 1;29(1):33-40 16848905 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Jul 18;7:58 10824287 - Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2000 Mar-Apr;18(2 Suppl 19):S45-52 11268155 - Phys Ther. 2001 Mar;81(3):903-14 15726032 - J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Jan;28(1):25-32 11514090 - Pain. 2001 Sep;93(3):317-25 18204402 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S60-74 19362231 - J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(3):210-5 11698884 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Oct 1;26(19):2090-4 11831210 - Appl Ergon. 2002 Jan;33(1):75-84 1989013 - Phys Ther. 1991 Feb;71(2):98-104; discussion 105-6 21294015 - Ergonomics. 2011 Feb;54(2):179-86 19487821 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Jun;39(6):478-83 18839484 - Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8 18758050 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;38(9):A1-A34 21945295 - Man Ther. 2012 Feb;17(1):53-9 9749689 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Sep;79(9):1089-94 18827326 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Oct;38(10):640-5 18164333 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74 18197104 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 15;33(2):183-6 15996890 - Man Ther. 2005 Nov;10(4):281-91 18796788 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;15(3):147-50 20436238 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23 CIT0030 CIT0032 CIT0031 CIT0012 CIT0033 Rao R (CIT0010) 2002; 84 Youdas JW (CIT0036) 1991; 71 CIT0014 Fiebert I (CIT0019) 1999; 12 CIT0013 CIT0035 CIT0016 CIT0015 CIT0037 CIT0018 CIT0017 Jordan A (CIT0023) 1997; 20 Hermann K (CIT0011) 2001; 81 CIT0021 CIT0020 CIT0001 Antonaci F (CIT0005) 2000; 18 Fiebert I (CIT0022) 1999; 3 Youdas JW (CIT0034) 1992; 72 CIT0003 CIT0025 CIT0002 CIT0024 CIT0027 CIT0004 CIT0026 CIT0007 CIT0029 CIT0006 CIT0028 CIT0009 CIT0008 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.005 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00005 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000103944.10408.BA – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.12.005 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1080/00140139.2010.544765 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90176-9 – ident: CIT0028 doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.15.3.147 – ident: CIT0035 doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0303 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.2519/jospt.1993.17.3.155 – volume: 81 start-page: 903 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: CIT0011 publication-title: Phys Ther. doi: 10.1093/ptj/81.3.903 contributor: fullname: Hermann K – ident: CIT0031 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.002 – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0626-9 – volume: 20 start-page: 487 issue: 7 year: 1997 ident: CIT0023 publication-title: J ManipPhysiol Ther. contributor: fullname: Jordan A – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00043-6 – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816044e8 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1097/00007632-199406000-00001 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2680 – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.15.3.147 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.07.004 – volume: 84 start-page: 1872 year: 2002 ident: CIT0010 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200210000-00021 contributor: fullname: Rao R – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060009 – ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180 – volume: 3 start-page: 91 issue: 3 year: 1999 ident: CIT0022 publication-title: J Man Manip Ther. contributor: fullname: Fiebert I – ident: CIT0037 doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.08.007 – volume: 18 start-page: S45 year: 2000 ident: CIT0005 publication-title: Clin Exp Rheumatol. contributor: fullname: Antonaci F – ident: CIT0002 doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-58 – ident: CIT0033 doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242 – volume: 71 start-page: 98 issue: 2 year: 1991 ident: CIT0036 publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.2.98 contributor: fullname: Youdas JW – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00009 – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2933 – volume: 72 start-page: 770 issue: 11 year: 1992 ident: CIT0034 publication-title: Phys Ther. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.11.770 contributor: fullname: Youdas JW – volume: 12 start-page: 165 issue: 3 year: 1999 ident: CIT0019 publication-title: J Back Musculoskelet Rehab. doi: 10.3233/BMR-1999-12304 contributor: fullname: Fiebert I – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00334-7 – ident: CIT0032 doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.06.002 |
SSID | ssj0008408 |
Score | 2.0686786 |
Snippet | Objectives: The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual... The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB)... OBJECTIVESThe influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed informaworld |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 33 |
SubjectTerms | Cervical pain Cervical range of motion Minimum detectable change Original Postural assessment Postural correction |
Title | Comparison of cervical range of motion in two seated postural conditions in adults 50 or older with cervical pain |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000017 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24421611 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1490768656 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3578193 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB42OfXSJn1u80CBXp21ZPnVW1kS8iAlhwTSk5H1oAuNvd11yN_PjGTvoxQKvdqSEZqx5htp9H0AX9AvMh0LGxWJE5EUuYtKJ1WkRClzm8lYKUoUb75nF_fy6iF9GEE63IXxRfu6np02vx5Pm9lPX1s5f9SToU5scnszJYYWBB6THdjB8Duk6P3yixlLuP-WZVFZ8Ly_FoyOh4k-JQwFBvUfgbeQEA7J8GGMEwh9-FZw2qIu_RsA_bOOciMwne_B6x5Rsm9h5Pswss1beHPbzz-7C7QB7-D3dCU5yFrHtF8ksMGCrhfQkyDow2YN655bRsIS1rB5u_TMHAzzZhPKu6iFp-1YsjRm7YK1pPTNaEd3_dW5mjXv4f787G56EfWCC5GWuegQaaeK-Pa45k7HNufOxYXTCdfC5DI1NtZOycRkWmnjpEE0UzuDEKQwhid1lnyA3aZt7Cdg0sgykY5L9BBZYgDUhvT_dGl1rZXgY5gMM13NA69G5fORvKw2zFStzTSGr5sGqTq_o-GC_EiV_KvzyWC-Cv8fOhRRjW2flpj6lHQYibB2DB-DOVcDGtxiDPmWoVcNiJt7-w26rOfo7l3083_3PIBXwitvUOXMIex2iyd7hPinq48R-V9eH3uvfwHFMgMi |
link.rule.ids | 230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VcoALb9qlPIzENd3YceK4N7SiWqBb9bCVyily_BAr0WTZTdW_37GdbHcREhLXxI6szMTzTTzzfQCf0C8KnTKblJljCWfCJdJxlSgmubAFT5XyieLsvJhe8m9X-dUe5EMvTCja1_XiuPl1fdwsfobayuW1Hg91YuOL2cQztCDwGD-Ah3kmJB2S9H4DxpwldsAVRSJLKvrGYHQ9TPV9ylBiWP8RmQs9xvFCfBjlGIIfuhOedshL_wZB_6yk3ApNp8_gSY8pyee49uewZ5sX8PSitwCZR-KAl_B7shEdJK0jOmwTOGDlGwz8lSjpQxYN6W5b4qUlrCHLdh24OQhmziYWePkRgbhjTfKUtCvSeq1v4v_p3j91qRbNK7g8_TKfTJNeciHRXLAOsXauPOMe1dTp1ArqXFo6nVHNjOC5sal2imem0Eobxw3imdoZBCGlMTSri-w17DdtYw-BcMNlxh3l6CNcYgjUxisAaml1rRWjIxgPb7paRmaNKmQkQlZbZqruzTSCk22DVF34p-GiAEmV_Wvyx8F8FX5B_lhENba9WWPyI_1xJALbERxEc24WNLjFCMSOoTcDPDv37h102sDS3Tvpm_-e-QEeTeezs-rs6_n3I3jMgg6Hr6N5C_vd6sa-QzTU1e-D798BcPQFfg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB5BkRAv3MdyGonXNLHjXLyhhVU5Wu1DK5WnyPGhrkSTsJuKv8-MnWx3ERISr4kTWZmJ5_uS8fcBvMO8yHUibFSmTkRSFC6qnFSREpUsbC4TpYgoHp_kR2fyy3l2vmP15Zv2dbM6bH9cHrarC99b2V_qeOoTi5fHc1JoQeAR98bFN-FWlmKSTUR9XISRt4RdcHkeVSUvxs3BmH5I94k2lFjavwf1QsI5ZMaHlU4gAOJ7JWpPwPRvMPTPbsqd8rS4D3dHXMk-hPk_gBu2fQj3lmMU2GkQD3gEP-db40HWOab9UoED1rTJgI4EWx-2atnwq2NkL2EN67uN1-dgyJ5NaPKiEV68Y8OyhHVr1pHfN6Pvutd37dWqfQxni0-n86NotF2ItCzEgHg7U6S6xzV3OrEFdy4pnU65FqaQmbGJdkqmJtdKGycNYprGGQQipTE8bfL0CRy0XWufAZNGVql0XGKeyArLoDbkAqgrqxutBJ9BPD3pug_qGrVnJUVV74Spvg7TDN7vBqQe_HcNF0xI6vRfF7-dwlfjW0S_RlRru6sNEqCKfkkiuJ3B0xDO7YSmtJhBsRfo7QBS6N4_g4nrlbrHRH3-31e-gdvLj4v62-eTry_gjvBWHNRK8xIOhvWVfYWAaGhe-9T_DT36BpE |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+cervical+range+of+motion+in+two+seated+postural+conditions+in+adults+50+or+older+with+cervical+pain&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+manual+%26+manipulative+therapy&rft.au=Dunleavy%2C+Kim&rft.au=Goldberg%2C+Allon&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.issn=1066-9817&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=39&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179%2F2042618612Y.0000000017&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1066-9817&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1066-9817&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1066-9817&client=summon |