Comparison of cervical range of motion in two seated postural conditions in adults 50 or older with cervical pain

Objectives: The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated. Methods: Individuals 50 or older with c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 33 - 39
Main Authors Dunleavy, Kim, Goldberg, Allon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 01.02.2013
Maney Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objectives: The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated. Methods: Individuals 50 or older with chronic neck pain participated in this within-subject observational study. ROM and posture (sagittal distances from the nose to the occiput, C7, and thoracic width and relative to a projected laser plumb line) were measured with the CROM device in the two postures. Test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC 95 ) were calculated. Results: Total planar ROM values were significantly different between HAB and ER postures. Extension, total rotation and lateral flexion, and R lateral flexion ROM were greater, while flexion decreased significantly in the ER posture. SEM% ranged from 4·0 to 9·5% and MDC 95 values were lower in ER (5·8-11·6°) compared to HAB (6·6-17·7°). MDC 95 % was moderately low for both postures (11·2-26·2%). Discussion: ROM was significantly different between HAB and ER postures. The directions most likely to detect real change in neck mobility were rotation in both postures, and extension as well as total flexion/extension in ER. Flexion and lateral flexion should be regarded cautiously as measures of improvement. Erect posture maximizes available cervical ROM in individuals over 50 with chronic neck pain compared to habitual postures.
AbstractList Objectives: The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated. Methods: Individuals 50 or older with chronic neck pain participated in this within-subject observational study. ROM and posture (sagittal distances from the nose to the occiput, C7, and thoracic width and relative to a projected laser plumb line) were measured with the CROM device in the two postures. Test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC 95 ) were calculated. Results: Total planar ROM values were significantly different between HAB and ER postures. Extension, total rotation and lateral flexion, and R lateral flexion ROM were greater, while flexion decreased significantly in the ER posture. SEM% ranged from 4·0 to 9·5% and MDC 95 values were lower in ER (5·8-11·6°) compared to HAB (6·6-17·7°). MDC 95 % was moderately low for both postures (11·2-26·2%). Discussion: ROM was significantly different between HAB and ER postures. The directions most likely to detect real change in neck mobility were rotation in both postures, and extension as well as total flexion/extension in ER. Flexion and lateral flexion should be regarded cautiously as measures of improvement. Erect posture maximizes available cervical ROM in individuals over 50 with chronic neck pain compared to habitual postures.
The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated. Individuals 50 or older with chronic neck pain participated in this within-subject observational study. ROM and posture (sagittal distances from the nose to the occiput, C7, and thoracic width and relative to a projected laser plumb line) were measured with the CROM device in the two postures. Test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) were calculated. Total planar ROM values were significantly different between HAB and ER postures. Extension, total rotation and lateral flexion, and R lateral flexion ROM were greater, while flexion decreased significantly in the ER posture. SEM% ranged from 4.0 to 9.5% and MDC95 values were lower in ER (5.8-11.6°) compared to HAB (6.6-17.7°). MDC95% was moderately low for both postures (11.2-26.2%). ROM was significantly different between HAB and ER postures. The directions most likely to detect real change in neck mobility were rotation in both postures, and extension as well as total flexion/extension in ER. Flexion and lateral flexion should be regarded cautiously as measures of improvement. Erect posture maximizes available cervical ROM in individuals over 50 with chronic neck pain compared to habitual postures.
OBJECTIVESThe influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB) compared to erect (ER) seated posture in adults 50 or older with cervical pain was investigated. METHODSIndividuals 50 or older with chronic neck pain participated in this within-subject observational study. ROM and posture (sagittal distances from the nose to the occiput, C7, and thoracic width and relative to a projected laser plumb line) were measured with the CROM device in the two postures. Test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) were calculated. RESULTSTotal planar ROM values were significantly different between HAB and ER postures. Extension, total rotation and lateral flexion, and R lateral flexion ROM were greater, while flexion decreased significantly in the ER posture. SEM% ranged from 4.0 to 9.5% and MDC95 values were lower in ER (5.8-11.6°) compared to HAB (6.6-17.7°). MDC95% was moderately low for both postures (11.2-26.2%). DISCUSSIONROM was significantly different between HAB and ER postures. The directions most likely to detect real change in neck mobility were rotation in both postures, and extension as well as total flexion/extension in ER. Flexion and lateral flexion should be regarded cautiously as measures of improvement. Erect posture maximizes available cervical ROM in individuals over 50 with chronic neck pain compared to habitual postures.
Author Goldberg, Allon
Dunleavy, Kim
AuthorAffiliation Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kim
  surname: Dunleavy
  fullname: Dunleavy, Kim
  email: ad6611@wayne.edu, dunleavy.kim@gmail.com
  organization: Wayne State UniversityDetroit
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Allon
  surname: Goldberg
  fullname: Goldberg, Allon
  organization: Wayne State UniversityDetroit
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24421611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkUtr3DAUhUVJaSZp_0LQshsnupYsyZtCGPqCQDftoiuh0SNRsSVHkjPk39dmpkm6ijYXdL57zoVzhk5iig6hCyCXAKK_aglrOUgO7e9Lcnwg3qDNKjSrcoI2QDhvegniFJ2V8mdBJCPyHTptGWuBA2zQ_TaNk86hpIiTx8blh2D0gLOOt279GVMNixYirvuEi9PVWTylUue8YCZFG1agrIS281AL7ghOGafBuoz3od49u046xPforddDcR-O8xz9-vL55_Zbc_Pj6_ft9U1jmGhrI0Snqex7MOANcQK8J9IbCqa1gnXWEeM1o5YbbaxnljO685ZRkNYC3XF6jj4dfKd5NzprXKzLxWrKYdT5USUd1P9KDHfqNj0o2gkJPV0MPh4NcrqfXalqDMW4YdDRpbkoYD0RXPJuzeIH1ORUSnb-KQaIWvtSL_pSz30tixcvj3xa-1fQAlwfgBB9yqPepzxYVfXjkLJfSjKhKPpKyF9-WKme
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_s21093297
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmpt_2017_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msksp_2018_09_013
crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_28_274
crossref_primary_10_1179_2042618614Y_0000000070
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_023_02285_2
crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2022_11_1_97
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtumed_2018_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_2055668318777984
crossref_primary_10_25048_tudod_852027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physio_2015_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jelekin_2021_102591
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msksp_2018_11_013
crossref_primary_10_13066_kspm_2021_16_3_55
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10439_024_03517_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humov_2020_102633
crossref_primary_10_1080_10255842_2018_1479745
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0036_1579551
crossref_primary_10_18857_jkpt_2017_29_4_153
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.005
10.1097/00007632-199611010-00005
10.1097/01.BRS.0000103944.10408.BA
10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.12.005
10.1080/00140139.2010.544765
10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90176-9
10.2519/jospt.1992.15.3.147
10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242
10.2519/jospt.2008.0303
10.2519/jospt.1993.17.3.155
10.1093/ptj/81.3.903
10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.002
10.1007/s00586-008-0626-9
10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00043-6
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816044e8
10.1097/00007632-199406000-00001
10.2519/jospt.2008.2680
10.1016/j.math.2004.07.004
10.2106/00004623-200210000-00021
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126
10.2522/ptj.20060009
10.2519/jospt.2010.3180
10.1016/j.math.2011.08.007
10.1186/1471-2474-7-58
10.1093/ptj/71.2.98
10.1097/00007632-200110010-00009
10.2519/jospt.2009.2933
10.1093/ptj/72.11.770
10.3233/BMR-1999-12304
10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00334-7
10.1016/j.math.2009.06.002
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2013 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: W. S. Maney & Son Ltd 2013 2013
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000017
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Physical Therapy
DocumentTitleAlternate Comparison of cervical ROM in two seated postural conditions
EISSN 2042-6186
EndPage 39
ExternalDocumentID 10_1179_2042618612Y_0000000017
24421611
11720959
Genre Original Articles
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
002
0BK
0R~
1~B
29K
36B
4.4
53G
AAJNR
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAWTL
ABBKH
ABEIZ
ABJNI
ABLCE
ABPTK
ABUPF
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGFS
ACKLR
ACLSK
ACVOX
ADBBV
ADCVX
ADFCX
AECIN
AFWLO
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIJEM
AIRBT
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AOIJS
ARJSQ
BAWUL
BLEHA
BOHLJ
CCCUG
D-I
DIK
DXH
E01
E3Z
EBS
EJD
ESX
F5P
HCLVR
HYE
HZ~
KYCEM
M4Z
O9-
OK1
P76
P7B
RNANH
RPM
RVRKI
TFL
TFW
TR2
YCJ
.GJ
04C
1KJ
2QV
AADGC
AAQQT
AAXYE
ABDBF
ABGNL
ABLIJ
ACIEZ
ACKFH
ACWGZ
ADOJX
ADPSL
ADVEQ
AEIQB
AETHL
AFLJA
AGXXK
AIKPT
ALYBC
APIUT
B0M
BMSDO
BTKSN
COGVJ
EAP
EAS
EBD
ECF
ECT
EHN
EIHBH
EMK
ENC
EPT
H13
HAMGP
IPNFZ
LJTGL
M46
NPM
NUSFT
Q~Q
RIG
SJN
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TUROJ
TUS
VQP
WQ9
~8M
AAYXX
AELXL
AEXKJ
CITATION
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-775a38991c1fc0e71ff08fc31c2d745de0cfa43d6cacdf4d643bfd4318dd13b63
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 1066-9817
IngestDate Tue Sep 17 20:51:09 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 22:49:27 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 23:45:03 EST 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:53:17 EDT 2024
Sun Dec 17 03:35:17 EST 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Postural assessment
Cervical range of motion
Minimum detectable change
Cervical pain
Postural correction
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c472t-775a38991c1fc0e71ff08fc31c2d745de0cfa43d6cacdf4d643bfd4318dd13b63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3578193?pdf=render
PMID 24421611
PQID 1490768656
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3578193
crossref_primary_10_1179_2042618612Y_0000000017
pubmed_primary_24421611
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1179_2042618612Y_0000000017
proquest_miscellaneous_1490768656
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20130201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 2
  year: 2013
  text: 20130201
  day: 1
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Suite 1C, Joseph's Well, Hanover Walk, Leeds LS3 1AB, UK
PublicationTitle The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy
PublicationTitleAlternate J Man Manip Ther
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Maney Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
– name: Maney Publishing
References 8923628 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Nov 1;21(21):2435-42
16676874 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;36(4):242-8
19643658 - Man Ther. 2010 Feb;15(1):54-60
9310902 - J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Sep;20(7):468-75
1409874 - Phys Ther. 1992 Nov;72(11):770-80
8472080 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993 Mar;17(3):155-60
12377921 - J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84-A(10):1872-81
8066508 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 15;19(12):1307-9
17341512 - Phys Ther. 2007 Apr;87(4):408-17
15681268 - Man Ther. 2005 Feb;10(1):44-51
14699273 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jan 1;29(1):33-40
16848905 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Jul 18;7:58
10824287 - Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2000 Mar-Apr;18(2 Suppl 19):S45-52
11268155 - Phys Ther. 2001 Mar;81(3):903-14
15726032 - J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Jan;28(1):25-32
11514090 - Pain. 2001 Sep;93(3):317-25
18204402 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S60-74
19362231 - J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(3):210-5
11698884 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Oct 1;26(19):2090-4
11831210 - Appl Ergon. 2002 Jan;33(1):75-84
1989013 - Phys Ther. 1991 Feb;71(2):98-104; discussion 105-6
21294015 - Ergonomics. 2011 Feb;54(2):179-86
19487821 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Jun;39(6):478-83
18839484 - Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
18758050 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;38(9):A1-A34
21945295 - Man Ther. 2012 Feb;17(1):53-9
9749689 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Sep;79(9):1089-94
18827326 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Oct;38(10):640-5
18164333 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74
18197104 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 15;33(2):183-6
15996890 - Man Ther. 2005 Nov;10(4):281-91
18796788 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;15(3):147-50
20436238 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23
CIT0030
CIT0032
CIT0031
CIT0012
CIT0033
Rao R (CIT0010) 2002; 84
Youdas JW (CIT0036) 1991; 71
CIT0014
Fiebert I (CIT0019) 1999; 12
CIT0013
CIT0035
CIT0016
CIT0015
CIT0037
CIT0018
CIT0017
Jordan A (CIT0023) 1997; 20
Hermann K (CIT0011) 2001; 81
CIT0021
CIT0020
CIT0001
Antonaci F (CIT0005) 2000; 18
Fiebert I (CIT0022) 1999; 3
Youdas JW (CIT0034) 1992; 72
CIT0003
CIT0025
CIT0002
CIT0024
CIT0027
CIT0004
CIT0026
CIT0007
CIT0029
CIT0006
CIT0028
CIT0009
CIT0008
References_xml – ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.005
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00005
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000103944.10408.BA
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.12.005
– ident: CIT0025
  doi: 10.1080/00140139.2010.544765
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90176-9
– ident: CIT0028
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.15.3.147
– ident: CIT0035
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0303
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1993.17.3.155
– volume: 81
  start-page: 903
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  ident: CIT0011
  publication-title: Phys Ther.
  doi: 10.1093/ptj/81.3.903
  contributor:
    fullname: Hermann K
– ident: CIT0031
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.002
– ident: CIT0001
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0626-9
– volume: 20
  start-page: 487
  issue: 7
  year: 1997
  ident: CIT0023
  publication-title: J ManipPhysiol Ther.
  contributor:
    fullname: Jordan A
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00043-6
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816044e8
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199406000-00001
– ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2680
– ident: CIT0029
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.15.3.147
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.07.004
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1872
  year: 2002
  ident: CIT0010
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am.
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-200210000-00021
  contributor:
    fullname: Rao R
– ident: CIT0027
  doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060009
– ident: CIT0030
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180
– volume: 3
  start-page: 91
  issue: 3
  year: 1999
  ident: CIT0022
  publication-title: J Man Manip Ther.
  contributor:
    fullname: Fiebert I
– ident: CIT0037
  doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.08.007
– volume: 18
  start-page: S45
  year: 2000
  ident: CIT0005
  publication-title: Clin Exp Rheumatol.
  contributor:
    fullname: Antonaci F
– ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-58
– ident: CIT0033
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242
– volume: 71
  start-page: 98
  issue: 2
  year: 1991
  ident: CIT0036
  publication-title: Phys Ther
  doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.2.98
  contributor:
    fullname: Youdas JW
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00009
– ident: CIT0020
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2933
– volume: 72
  start-page: 770
  issue: 11
  year: 1992
  ident: CIT0034
  publication-title: Phys Ther.
  doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.11.770
  contributor:
    fullname: Youdas JW
– volume: 12
  start-page: 165
  issue: 3
  year: 1999
  ident: CIT0019
  publication-title: J Back Musculoskelet Rehab.
  doi: 10.3233/BMR-1999-12304
  contributor:
    fullname: Fiebert I
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00334-7
– ident: CIT0032
  doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.06.002
SSID ssj0008408
Score 2.0686786
Snippet Objectives: The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual...
The influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual (HAB)...
OBJECTIVESThe influence of self-selected unsupported seated posture on cervical range of motion (ROM) has not been widely studied. Cervical ROM in habitual...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
pubmed
informaworld
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 33
SubjectTerms Cervical pain
Cervical range of motion
Minimum detectable change
Original
Postural assessment
Postural correction
Title Comparison of cervical range of motion in two seated postural conditions in adults 50 or older with cervical pain
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000017
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24421611
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1490768656
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3578193
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB42OfXSJn1u80CBXp21ZPnVW1kS8iAlhwTSk5H1oAuNvd11yN_PjGTvoxQKvdqSEZqx5htp9H0AX9AvMh0LGxWJE5EUuYtKJ1WkRClzm8lYKUoUb75nF_fy6iF9GEE63IXxRfu6np02vx5Pm9lPX1s5f9SToU5scnszJYYWBB6THdjB8Duk6P3yixlLuP-WZVFZ8Ly_FoyOh4k-JQwFBvUfgbeQEA7J8GGMEwh9-FZw2qIu_RsA_bOOciMwne_B6x5Rsm9h5Pswss1beHPbzz-7C7QB7-D3dCU5yFrHtF8ksMGCrhfQkyDow2YN655bRsIS1rB5u_TMHAzzZhPKu6iFp-1YsjRm7YK1pPTNaEd3_dW5mjXv4f787G56EfWCC5GWuegQaaeK-Pa45k7HNufOxYXTCdfC5DI1NtZOycRkWmnjpEE0UzuDEKQwhid1lnyA3aZt7Cdg0sgykY5L9BBZYgDUhvT_dGl1rZXgY5gMM13NA69G5fORvKw2zFStzTSGr5sGqTq_o-GC_EiV_KvzyWC-Cv8fOhRRjW2flpj6lHQYibB2DB-DOVcDGtxiDPmWoVcNiJt7-w26rOfo7l3083_3PIBXwitvUOXMIex2iyd7hPinq48R-V9eH3uvfwHFMgMi
link.rule.ids 230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VcoALb9qlPIzENd3YceK4N7SiWqBb9bCVyily_BAr0WTZTdW_37GdbHcREhLXxI6szMTzTTzzfQCf0C8KnTKblJljCWfCJdJxlSgmubAFT5XyieLsvJhe8m9X-dUe5EMvTCja1_XiuPl1fdwsfobayuW1Hg91YuOL2cQztCDwGD-Ah3kmJB2S9H4DxpwldsAVRSJLKvrGYHQ9TPV9ylBiWP8RmQs9xvFCfBjlGIIfuhOedshL_wZB_6yk3ApNp8_gSY8pyee49uewZ5sX8PSitwCZR-KAl_B7shEdJK0jOmwTOGDlGwz8lSjpQxYN6W5b4qUlrCHLdh24OQhmziYWePkRgbhjTfKUtCvSeq1v4v_p3j91qRbNK7g8_TKfTJNeciHRXLAOsXauPOMe1dTp1ArqXFo6nVHNjOC5sal2imem0Eobxw3imdoZBCGlMTSri-w17DdtYw-BcMNlxh3l6CNcYgjUxisAaml1rRWjIxgPb7paRmaNKmQkQlZbZqruzTSCk22DVF34p-GiAEmV_Wvyx8F8FX5B_lhENba9WWPyI_1xJALbERxEc24WNLjFCMSOoTcDPDv37h102sDS3Tvpm_-e-QEeTeezs-rs6_n3I3jMgg6Hr6N5C_vd6sa-QzTU1e-D798BcPQFfg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB5BkRAv3MdyGonXNLHjXLyhhVU5Wu1DK5WnyPGhrkSTsJuKv8-MnWx3ERISr4kTWZmJ5_uS8fcBvMO8yHUibFSmTkRSFC6qnFSREpUsbC4TpYgoHp_kR2fyy3l2vmP15Zv2dbM6bH9cHrarC99b2V_qeOoTi5fHc1JoQeAR98bFN-FWlmKSTUR9XISRt4RdcHkeVSUvxs3BmH5I94k2lFjavwf1QsI5ZMaHlU4gAOJ7JWpPwPRvMPTPbsqd8rS4D3dHXMk-hPk_gBu2fQj3lmMU2GkQD3gEP-db40HWOab9UoED1rTJgI4EWx-2atnwq2NkL2EN67uN1-dgyJ5NaPKiEV68Y8OyhHVr1pHfN6Pvutd37dWqfQxni0-n86NotF2ItCzEgHg7U6S6xzV3OrEFdy4pnU65FqaQmbGJdkqmJtdKGycNYprGGQQipTE8bfL0CRy0XWufAZNGVql0XGKeyArLoDbkAqgrqxutBJ9BPD3pug_qGrVnJUVV74Spvg7TDN7vBqQe_HcNF0xI6vRfF7-dwlfjW0S_RlRru6sNEqCKfkkiuJ3B0xDO7YSmtJhBsRfo7QBS6N4_g4nrlbrHRH3-31e-gdvLj4v62-eTry_gjvBWHNRK8xIOhvWVfYWAaGhe-9T_DT36BpE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+cervical+range+of+motion+in+two+seated+postural+conditions+in+adults+50+or+older+with+cervical+pain&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+manual+%26+manipulative+therapy&rft.au=Dunleavy%2C+Kim&rft.au=Goldberg%2C+Allon&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.issn=1066-9817&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=39&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179%2F2042618612Y.0000000017&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1066-9817&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1066-9817&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1066-9817&client=summon