The Influence of Verification Jig on Framework Fit for Nonsegmented Fixed Implant-Supported Complete Denture

ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant‐supported full‐arch prosthesis framework is fabricated with or without the aid of a verification jig. Materials and Methods: This investigation...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in	Clinical implant dentistry and related research Vol. 14; no. s1; pp. e188 - e195
Main Authors	Ercoli, Carlo, Geminiani, Alessandro, Feng, Changyong, Lee, Heeje
Format	Journal Article
Language	English
Published	Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2012
Subjects	Acrylic Resins - chemistry Aged computer aided prosthetic designs Computer-Aided Design Dental Alloys - chemistry Dental Casting Investment - chemistry dental casting technique/instrumentation Dental Implant-Abutment Design Dental Implants Dental Impression Materials - chemistry Dental Impression Technique - instrumentation Dental Marginal Adaptation Dental Materials - chemistry dental prosthesis dental prosthesis design/methods Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported Denture Design - instrumentation Denture, Complete Elastomers - chemistry Humans implant-supported implants restoration Jaw, Edentulous - rehabilitation Middle Aged Polyvinyls - chemistry Retrospective Studies Siloxanes - chemistry Titanium - chemistry
Online Access	Get full text

Cover

Loading…

Abstract	ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant‐supported full‐arch prosthesis framework is fabricated with or without the aid of a verification jig. Materials and Methods: This investigation was approved by the University of Rochester Research Subject Review Board (protocol #RSRB00038482). Thirty edentulous patients, 49 to 73 years old (mean 61 years old), rehabilitated with a nonsegmented fixed implant‐supported complete denture were included in the study. During the restorative process, final impressions were made using the pickup impression technique and elastomeric impression materials. For 16 patients, a verification jig was made (group J), while for the remaining 14 patients, a verification jig was not used (group NJ) and the framework was fabricated directly on the master cast. During the framework try‐in appointment, the fit was assessed by clinical (Sheffield test) and radiographic inspection and recorded as passive or nonpassive. Results: When a verification jig was used (group J, n = 16), all frameworks exhibited clinically passive fit, while when a verification jig was not used (group NJ, n = 14), only two frameworks fit. This difference was statistically significant (p < .001). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the fabrication of a verification jig ensured clinically passive fit of metal frameworks in nonsegmented fixed implant‐supported complete denture.
AbstractList	ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant‐supported full‐arch prosthesis framework is fabricated with or without the aid of a verification jig. Materials and Methods: This investigation was approved by the University of Rochester Research Subject Review Board (protocol #RSRB00038482). Thirty edentulous patients, 49 to 73 years old (mean 61 years old), rehabilitated with a nonsegmented fixed implant‐supported complete denture were included in the study. During the restorative process, final impressions were made using the pickup impression technique and elastomeric impression materials. For 16 patients, a verification jig was made (group J), while for the remaining 14 patients, a verification jig was not used (group NJ) and the framework was fabricated directly on the master cast. During the framework try‐in appointment, the fit was assessed by clinical (Sheffield test) and radiographic inspection and recorded as passive or nonpassive. Results: When a verification jig was used (group J, n = 16), all frameworks exhibited clinically passive fit, while when a verification jig was not used (group NJ, n = 14), only two frameworks fit. This difference was statistically significant (p < .001). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the fabrication of a verification jig ensured clinically passive fit of metal frameworks in nonsegmented fixed implant‐supported complete denture. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant-supported full-arch prosthesis framework is fabricated with or without the aid of a verification jig. This investigation was approved by the University of Rochester Research Subject Review Board (protocol #RSRB00038482). Thirty edentulous patients, 49 to 73 years old (mean 61 years old), rehabilitated with a nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture were included in the study. During the restorative process, final impressions were made using the pickup impression technique and elastomeric impression materials. For 16 patients, a verification jig was made (group J), while for the remaining 14 patients, a verification jig was not used (group NJ) and the framework was fabricated directly on the master cast. During the framework try-in appointment, the fit was assessed by clinical (Sheffield test) and radiographic inspection and recorded as passive or nonpassive. When a verification jig was used (group J, n = 16), all frameworks exhibited clinically passive fit, while when a verification jig was not used (group NJ, n = 14), only two frameworks fit. This difference was statistically significant (p < .001). Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the fabrication of a verification jig ensured clinically passive fit of metal frameworks in nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture. Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant‐supported full‐arch prosthesis framework is fabricated with or without the aid of a verification jig. Materials and Methods: This investigation was approved by the University of Rochester Research Subject Review Board (protocol #RSRB00038482). Thirty edentulous patients, 49 to 73 years old (mean 61 years old), rehabilitated with a nonsegmented fixed implant‐supported complete denture were included in the study. During the restorative process, final impressions were made using the pickup impression technique and elastomeric impression materials. For 16 patients, a verification jig was made (group J), while for the remaining 14 patients, a verification jig was not used (group NJ) and the framework was fabricated directly on the master cast. During the framework try‐in appointment, the fit was assessed by clinical (Sheffield test) and radiographic inspection and recorded as passive or nonpassive. Results: When a verification jig was used (group J, n = 16), all frameworks exhibited clinically passive fit, while when a verification jig was not used (group NJ, n = 14), only two frameworks fit. This difference was statistically significant ( p < .001). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the fabrication of a verification jig ensured clinically passive fit of metal frameworks in nonsegmented fixed implant‐supported complete denture. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant-supported full-arch prosthesis framework is fabricated with or without the aid of a verification jig.PURPOSEThe purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant-supported full-arch prosthesis framework is fabricated with or without the aid of a verification jig.This investigation was approved by the University of Rochester Research Subject Review Board (protocol #RSRB00038482). Thirty edentulous patients, 49 to 73 years old (mean 61 years old), rehabilitated with a nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture were included in the study. During the restorative process, final impressions were made using the pickup impression technique and elastomeric impression materials. For 16 patients, a verification jig was made (group J), while for the remaining 14 patients, a verification jig was not used (group NJ) and the framework was fabricated directly on the master cast. During the framework try-in appointment, the fit was assessed by clinical (Sheffield test) and radiographic inspection and recorded as passive or nonpassive.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis investigation was approved by the University of Rochester Research Subject Review Board (protocol #RSRB00038482). Thirty edentulous patients, 49 to 73 years old (mean 61 years old), rehabilitated with a nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture were included in the study. During the restorative process, final impressions were made using the pickup impression technique and elastomeric impression materials. For 16 patients, a verification jig was made (group J), while for the remaining 14 patients, a verification jig was not used (group NJ) and the framework was fabricated directly on the master cast. During the framework try-in appointment, the fit was assessed by clinical (Sheffield test) and radiographic inspection and recorded as passive or nonpassive.When a verification jig was used (group J, n = 16), all frameworks exhibited clinically passive fit, while when a verification jig was not used (group NJ, n = 14), only two frameworks fit. This difference was statistically significant (p < .001).RESULTSWhen a verification jig was used (group J, n = 16), all frameworks exhibited clinically passive fit, while when a verification jig was not used (group NJ, n = 14), only two frameworks fit. This difference was statistically significant (p < .001).Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the fabrication of a verification jig ensured clinically passive fit of metal frameworks in nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture.CONCLUSIONSWithin the limitations of this retrospective study, the fabrication of a verification jig ensured clinically passive fit of metal frameworks in nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture.
Author	Geminiani, Alessandro Feng, Changyong Lee, Heeje Ercoli, Carlo
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Carlo surname: Ercoli fullname: Ercoli, Carlo email: carlo_ercoli@urmc.rochester.edu organization: Associate professor, chair, and program director, Division of Prosthodontics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Alessandro surname: Geminiani fullname: Geminiani, Alessandro organization: postgraduate student, Division of Periodontics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Changyong surname: Feng fullname: Feng, Changyong organization: assistant professor, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Heeje surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Heeje organization: clinical assistant professor, Division of Prosthodontics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22176765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqNUU1v3CAURFWq5qP9CxXHXuwCNuCVqkrVpptsFW0P-VQviDXPKRvbOICVzb8vziY59BQOvKfHzDw0c4j2etcDQpiSnKbzdZNTSaqsYqTKGaE0J6RkPN--QwevD3up56zISDWb7aPDEDaEMEoF_YD2GaNSSMEPUHvxF_Cyb9oR-hqwa_AVeNvYWkfrevzL3uJUFl538OD8HV7YiBvn8cr1AW476COYNNyme9kNre5jdj4Og_PTfO7SCCLg44QbPXxE7xvdBvj0XI_Q5eLnxfw0O_t9spz_OMvqUjKemaoAyrUUWqxBAiOlkVxCY4gk3JRlY_SMy5leA63qkoBgppYlGCZEbRKiOEJfdrqDd_cjhKg6G2po0_fAjUFRwhjjFZMyQT8_Q8d1B0YN3nbaP6oXhxLg-w5QexeCh0bVNj6ZE722bdJSUyRqoybn1eS8miJRT5GobRKo_hN42fEG6rcd9cG28Phmnpovj1OT6NmObkOE7Std-zslZCG5ul6dqHNWLf6sTom6Kf4Bej2yWg
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_29794 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12695 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12633 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_02_010 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13593 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04495_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_adaj_2018_04_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2021_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13985 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13922 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_08_015 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13157 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13569 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13602 crossref_primary_10_1177_20501684221133417 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2017_11_021 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12433 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_13_60358_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13664 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10019_1327 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13409 crossref_primary_10_3889_oamjms_2022_7662 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_04_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2014_04_014 crossref_primary_10_32542_implantology_202005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2021_05_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_10_024 crossref_primary_10_2186_jpr_JPR_D_24_00261 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04883_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12274 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_71399 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13536 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13630 crossref_primary_10_14219_jada_2013_45 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13772 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2014_09_029 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10019_1359 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_adaj_2019_01_022 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13417 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_02_016 crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_9373818
Cites_doi	10.1097/01.id.0000144509.58901.f7 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70209-9 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70095-3 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90296-O 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.015 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90029-X 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00157.x 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90008-6 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90031-0 10.1067/mpr.2002.128070 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70229-5 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-Y 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00594.x
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
DBID	BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8
DOI	10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00425.x
DatabaseName	Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN	1708-8208
EndPage	e195
ExternalDocumentID	22176765 10_1111_j_1708_8208_2011_00425_x CID425 ark_67375_WNG_S28FZNH0_X
Genre	article Journal Article
GroupedDBID	--- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29B 31~ 33P 34H 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AHBTC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WBNRW WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WPGGZ WQJ WRC WXSBR XG1 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AFWVQ ALVPJ AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c4725-d83e15a76a6be7e204d757efd0705d44fda9579abe18c40e62dc74ed266cd05d3
IEDL.DBID	DR2
ISSN	1523-0899 1708-8208
IngestDate	Thu Jul 10 18:19:53 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:58:15 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:10:09 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:46:03 EST 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:47:34 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	s1
Language	English
License	http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4725-d83e15a76a6be7e204d757efd0705d44fda9579abe18c40e62dc74ed266cd05d3
Notes	ark:/67375/WNG-S28FZNH0-X istex:ABE22A81D9395D65816B1914D95B60F58EDB4D75 ArticleID:CID425 Presented at the Academy of Prosthodontics Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, May 2010. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
PMID	22176765
PQID	1022258277
PQPubID	23479
PageCount	8
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_1022258277 pubmed_primary_22176765 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1708_8208_2011_00425_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8208_2011_00425_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8208_2011_00425_x_CID425 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_S28FZNH0_X
ProviderPackageCode	CITATION AAYXX
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	May 2012
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2012-05-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 05 year: 2012 text: May 2012
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Oxford, UK – name: United States
PublicationTitle	Clinical implant dentistry and related research
PublicationTitleAlternate	Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
PublicationYear	2012
Publisher	Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml	– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References	Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:885-888. Assunção WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004; 13:358-366. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100:285-291. Mojon P, Oberholzer JP, Meyer JM, Belser UC. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64:684-688. La Cruz de JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, et al. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: a comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:329-336. Jemt T, Lindén B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 7:40-44. Wicks RA, deRijk WG, Windeler AS. An evaluation of fit in osseointegrated implant components using torque/turn analysis. J Prosthodont 1994; 3:206-212. Worthington P, Bolender CL, Taylor TD. The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 2:77-84. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, et al. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:629-638. Yanase RT, Binon PP, Jemt T, Gulbransen HJ, Parel S. Current issues forum. How do you test a cast framework fit or a full-arch fixed implant-supported prosthesis? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:471-474. Zarb GA, Symington JM. Osseointegrated dental implants: preliminary report on a replication study. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:271-276. Gallucci GO, Morton D, Weber H-P. Loading protocols for dental implants in edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 24 (Suppl):132-146. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:468-475. Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:500-509. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92:470-476. McCartney JW, Pearson R. Segmental framework matrix: master cast verification, corrected cast guide, and analog transfer template for implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:197-200. Hebel KS, Galindo D, Gajjar RC. Implant position record and implant position cast: minimizing errors, procedures and patient visits in the fabrication of the milled-bar prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:107-116. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992; 10:153-201. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:7-13. Kim S, Nicholls JI, Han C-H, Lee K-W. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:747-755. Akça K, Cehreli MC. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:517-523. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:169-178. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:68-75. Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, Weber H-P, Wismeijer D. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 24 (Suppl):110-117. 1994; 9 1992; 7 1987; 2 1990; 64 2009; 24 2000; 27 2004; 92 1997; 77 2004; 19 2006; 21 1999; 14 2002; 88 2004; 13 2000; 83 1985 1983; 50 2003 1992; 10 2008; 100 1999; 81 1994; 3 1994; 71 1996; 76 Kapos T (e_1_2_6_15_2) 2009; 24 Assif D (e_1_2_6_11_2) 1999; 14 Worthington P (e_1_2_6_5_2) 1987; 2 e_1_2_6_19_2 Yanase RT (e_1_2_6_18_2) 1994; 9 e_1_2_6_12_2 e_1_2_6_13_2 e_1_2_6_10_2 e_1_2_6_16_2 e_1_2_6_17_2 Kim S (e_1_2_6_25_2) 2006; 21 Anusavice KJ (e_1_2_6_14_2) 2003 e_1_2_6_20_2 Gallucci GO (e_1_2_6_21_2) 2009; 24 Carr AB (e_1_2_6_26_2) 1992; 7 Akça K (e_1_2_6_23_2) 2004; 19 e_1_2_6_8_2 e_1_2_6_7_2 Jemt T (e_1_2_6_6_2) 1992; 7 e_1_2_6_4_2 e_1_2_6_3_2 Zarb GA (e_1_2_6_2_2) 1985 e_1_2_6_24_2 Kallus T (e_1_2_6_9_2) 1994; 9 e_1_2_6_22_2 e_1_2_6_27_2
References_xml	– reference: Assunção WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004; 13:358-366. – reference: Gallucci GO, Morton D, Weber H-P. Loading protocols for dental implants in edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 24 (Suppl):132-146. – reference: Kim S, Nicholls JI, Han C-H, Lee K-W. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:747-755. – reference: Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, et al. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:629-638. – reference: Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92:470-476. – reference: Yanase RT, Binon PP, Jemt T, Gulbransen HJ, Parel S. Current issues forum. How do you test a cast framework fit or a full-arch fixed implant-supported prosthesis? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:471-474. – reference: Jemt T, Lindén B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 7:40-44. – reference: Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:68-75. – reference: Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:500-509. – reference: La Cruz de JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, et al. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: a comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:329-336. – reference: Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:885-888. – reference: Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100:285-291. – reference: Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:468-475. – reference: Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:7-13. – reference: McCartney JW, Pearson R. Segmental framework matrix: master cast verification, corrected cast guide, and analog transfer template for implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:197-200. – reference: Worthington P, Bolender CL, Taylor TD. The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 2:77-84. – reference: Zarb GA, Symington JM. Osseointegrated dental implants: preliminary report on a replication study. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:271-276. – reference: Wicks RA, deRijk WG, Windeler AS. An evaluation of fit in osseointegrated implant components using torque/turn analysis. J Prosthodont 1994; 3:206-212. – reference: Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, Weber H-P, Wismeijer D. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 24 (Suppl):110-117. – reference: Akça K, Cehreli MC. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:517-523. – reference: Mojon P, Oberholzer JP, Meyer JM, Belser UC. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64:684-688. – reference: Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992; 10:153-201. – reference: Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:169-178. – reference: Hebel KS, Galindo D, Gajjar RC. Implant position record and implant position cast: minimizing errors, procedures and patient visits in the fabrication of the milled-bar prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:107-116. – volume: 13 start-page: 358 year: 2004 end-page: 366 article-title: Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations publication-title: Implant Dent – volume: 9 start-page: 169 year: 1994 end-page: 178 article-title: Loose gold screws frequently occur in full‐arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 100 start-page: 285 year: 2008 end-page: 291 article-title: The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 14 start-page: 885 year: 1999 end-page: 888 article-title: Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 71 start-page: 197 year: 1994 end-page: 200 article-title: Segmental framework matrix: master cast verification, corrected cast guide, and analog transfer template for implant‐supported prostheses publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 83 start-page: 107 year: 2000 end-page: 116 article-title: Implant position record and implant position cast: minimizing errors, procedures and patient visits in the fabrication of the milled‐bar prosthesis publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 10 start-page: 153 year: 1992 end-page: 201 article-title: Biomechanical factors affecting the bone‐dental implant interface publication-title: Clin Mater – volume: 19 start-page: 517 year: 2004 end-page: 523 article-title: Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 2 start-page: 77 year: 1987 end-page: 84 article-title: The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4‐year trial period publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg – start-page: 295 year: 2003 end-page: 347 – volume: 64 start-page: 684 year: 1990 end-page: 688 article-title: Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 7 start-page: 468 year: 1992 end-page: 475 article-title: Comparison of impression techniques for a two‐implant 15‐degree divergent model publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 27 start-page: 629 year: 2000 end-page: 638 article-title: Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit‐2 system publication-title: J Oral Rehabil – volume: 24 start-page: 110 year: 2009 end-page: 117 article-title: Computer‐aided design and computer‐assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg – volume: 7 start-page: 40 year: 1992 end-page: 44 article-title: Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg – volume: 77 start-page: 68 year: 1997 end-page: 75 article-title: A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone‐Lock implant system publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 81 start-page: 7 year: 1999 end-page: 13 article-title: Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 76 start-page: 500 year: 1996 end-page: 509 article-title: The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 3 start-page: 206 year: 1994 end-page: 212 article-title: An evaluation of fit in osseointegrated implant components using torque/turn analysis publication-title: J Prosthodont – volume: 88 start-page: 329 year: 2002 end-page: 336 article-title: Verification jig for implant‐supported prostheses: a comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 24 start-page: 132 year: 2009 end-page: 146 article-title: Loading protocols for dental implants in edentulous patients publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg – volume: 92 start-page: 470 year: 2004 end-page: 476 article-title: An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 9 start-page: 471 year: 1994 end-page: 474 article-title: Current issues forum. How do you test a cast framework fit or a full‐arch fixed implant‐supported prosthesis? publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 21 start-page: 747 year: 2006 end-page: 755 article-title: Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 50 start-page: 271 year: 1983 end-page: 276 article-title: Osseointegrated dental implants: preliminary report on a replication study publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – start-page: 117 year: 1985 end-page: 128 – start-page: 295 volume-title: Phillips' science of dental materials‐11 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_6_14_2 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_2 doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000144509.58901.f7 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70209-9 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70095-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_22_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90296-O – volume: 7 start-page: 468 year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_6_26_2 article-title: Comparison of impression techniques for a two‐implant 15‐degree divergent model publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 9 start-page: 169 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_6_9_2 article-title: Loose gold screws frequently occur in full‐arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – start-page: 117 volume-title: Tissue‐integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry‐1 year: 1985 ident: e_1_2_6_2_2 – ident: e_1_2_6_24_2 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.015 – ident: e_1_2_6_3_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90029-X – ident: e_1_2_6_4_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00157.x – ident: e_1_2_6_13_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90008-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_2 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90031-0 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_2 doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128070 – volume: 24 start-page: 110 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_6_15_2 article-title: Computer‐aided design and computer‐assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg – volume: 9 start-page: 471 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_6_18_2 article-title: Current issues forum. How do you test a cast framework fit or a full‐arch fixed implant‐supported prosthesis? publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 14 start-page: 885 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_6_11_2 article-title: Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 2 start-page: 77 year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_6_5_2 article-title: The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4‐year trial period publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg – volume: 19 start-page: 517 year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_23_2 article-title: Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – volume: 7 start-page: 40 year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_6_6_2 article-title: Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg – ident: e_1_2_6_16_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70229-5 – volume: 21 start-page: 747 year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_6_25_2 article-title: Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants – ident: e_1_2_6_7_2 doi: 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-Y – ident: e_1_2_6_12_2 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00594.x – volume: 24 start-page: 132 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_6_21_2 article-title: Loading protocols for dental implants in edentulous patients publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
SSID	ssj0021161
Score	2.191757
Snippet	ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an... Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant‐supported... The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess if there was a difference in the likelihood of achieving passive fit when an implant-supported full-arch...
SourceID	proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	e188
SubjectTerms	Acrylic Resins - chemistry Aged computer aided prosthetic designs Computer-Aided Design Dental Alloys - chemistry Dental Casting Investment - chemistry dental casting technique/instrumentation Dental Implant-Abutment Design Dental Implants Dental Impression Materials - chemistry Dental Impression Technique - instrumentation Dental Marginal Adaptation Dental Materials - chemistry dental prosthesis dental prosthesis design/methods Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported Denture Design - instrumentation Denture, Complete Elastomers - chemistry Humans implant-supported implants restoration Jaw, Edentulous - rehabilitation Middle Aged Polyvinyls - chemistry Retrospective Studies Siloxanes - chemistry Titanium - chemistry
Title	The Influence of Verification Jig on Framework Fit for Nonsegmented Fixed Implant-Supported Complete Denture
URI	https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-S28FZNH0-X/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1708-8208.2011.00425.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22176765 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1022258277
Volume	14
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link	http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQuXCBIl7hJSMhbl4ljh17j6glbCuxB6Cw4mL5lapalEXtrrTqiZ_Ab-SXMOM8xFY9VIhLEllxFE--sb9JJt8Q8jrKhrtQchbstGGi1JZpX06Z5XC6EyJ3qRbBh3k1OxHHC7no85_wX5hOH2J84YaekeZrdHDrLnadXOWawQqmeyVOxN8E-SSmbiE_-jgqSUGY00un8pLhl64rST3XXWhnpbqNRt9eR0N3WW1alup7ZDkMqMtGWU42azfxl1e0Hv_PiPfJ3Z690rcd3O6TW7F9QFqAGj0aip3QVUO_AKyb_mUgPT47pbCrhywwWp-tKVBlOsdE7tMkChqgcQtb1CqGR_375y-sNop5wIHijAXgivQwrY_xITmp330-mLG-jAPzQnHJgi5jIa2qbOWiijwXQUkVmwCzjQxCNAATqabWxUJ7kceKB69EDEAdfIAzykdkr1218QmhvKyqBiimbkoIgxo9LZzwvHDWVary0mdEDY_M-F7jHEttfDd_xTpgQ4M2NGhDk2xothkpxp4_Op2PG_R5k1AxdrDnS8yTU9J8nb83n7iuv81nuVlk5NUAGwPei59kbBtXmwvTxduaK5WRxx2exqtxiBZhWDIjMqHixvdlDo4O4eDpP_Z7Ru5AK--yOp-TvfX5Jr4A5rV2L5NP_QGLZR53
linkProvider	Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml	http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQe4ALD_EK5WEkxM2rxLFj7xG1hN3S5gAtrLhY8auqWmWrdlda9cRP6G_sL2HsPMRWPVSISxJFthWPv7Fn7Mk3CH1w3FNtc0psPfaE5bIm0uRjUlMorhlLdcxFsF8Vk0O2O-OzLh1Q-Bem5YcYNtyCZsT5Oih42JBe13KRSgJLmOyoOAMAR2BQboYE39G_-jZwSYGj05Gn0pyEs64bYT23tbS2Vm0Gsa9uM0TX7dq4MJWP0GnfpTYe5WS0XOiRubzB9vif-vwYPewMWPypRdwTdM81T1EDaMPTPt8Jnnv8A5Dtu_1AvHt8hOFW9oFguDxeYLCWcRViuY8iL6iFlyu4BrpiGO3r31ch4WgIBbY4TFqAL4d34hLpnqHD8vPB9oR0mRyIYYJyYmXuMl6Loi60E46mzAounLcw4XDLmAekcDGutcukYakrqDWCOQvWg7FQIn-ONpp5414iTPOi8GBlSp-DJ-TlONPM0EzXuhCF4SZBoh8zZTqa85Bt41T95e6ADFWQoQoyVFGGapWgbKh51lJ93KHOxwiLoUJ9fhJC5QRXP6sv6juV5a9qkqpZgt73uFGgwOFUpm7cfHmhWpdbUiES9KIF1NAaBYcRusUTxCMs7vxdanu6Aw-v_rHeO3R_crC_p_am1dct9ABK0DbI8zXaWJwv3RswxBb6bVSwP3ibIpI
linkToPdf	http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQKyEuQMUrQMFIiJtXiWPH3iPqku4WiBBQWHGx_KyqRdmq7EorTvwEfiO_pOO8xFY9VIhLEkW2FY-_sWfsyTcIvfQ8UONySpweB8JyqYm0-ZhoCsUNY6lpchG8r4rpMTua83kX_xT_hWn5IYYNt6gZzXwdFfzMhW0lF6kksILJjokz4m8E9uQuK1IZET75OFBJgZ_TcafSnMSjrktRPVe1tLVU7Uapb66yQ7fN2mZdKu-gRd-jNhxlMVqvzMj-vET2-H-6fBfd7sxX_LrF2x664et7qAas4Vmf7QQvA_4CuA7dbiA-Oj3BcCv7MDBcnq4w2Mq4ipHcJw0rqIOXG7hGsmIY6z-_fsd0ozEQ2OE4ZQG6PJ40C6S_j47LN58PpqTL40AsE5QTJ3OfcS0KXRgvPE2ZE1z44GC64Y6xADjhYqyNz6RlqS-os4J5B7aDdVAif4B26mXtHyFM86IIYGPKkIMfFOQ4M8zSzGhTiMJymyDRD5myHcl5zLXxXf3l7IAMVZShijJUjQzVJkHZUPOsJfq4Rp1XDSqGCvp8EQPlBFdfq0P1icryWzVN1TxBL3rYKFDfeCaja79c_1Ctwy2pEAl62OJpaI2Cuwjd4gniDSqu_V3qYDaBh8f_WO85uvlhUqp3s-rtE3QLCtA2wvMp2lmdr_0-WGEr86xRrwsAwiFK
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Influence+of+Verification+Jig+on+Framework+Fit+for+Nonsegmented+Fixed+Implant%E2%80%90Supported+Complete+Denture&rft.jtitle=Clinical+implant+dentistry+and+related+research&rft.au=Ercoli%2C+Carlo&rft.au=Geminiani%2C+Alessandro&rft.au=Feng%2C+Changyong&rft.au=Lee%2C+Heeje&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=1523-0899&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=e188&rft.epage=e195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1708-8208.2011.00425.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1708-8208.2011.00425.x&rft.externalDocID=CID425
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1523-0899&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1523-0899&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1523-0899&client=summon