Urban forests near roads do not reduce gaseous air pollutant concentrations but have an impact on particles levels

• Published in: Landscape and urban planning Vol. 158; pp. 39 - 47
• Main Authors: Yli-Pelkonen, Vesa, Setälä, Heikki, Viippola, Viljami
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.02.2017
• Subjects: air; Air pollution; Air quality; canopy; climate; Ecosystem services; Finland; Forests; ground vegetation; Human influences; Near-road environment; Nitrogen dioxide; ozone; particulates; Passive sampling; Pollutants; roads; samplers; summer; Trees; Urban trees; Urban vegetation; Vegetation; volatile organic compounds; ANE, Finland; Finland, Etelae-Suomi, Helsinki; Finland; Air pollution; Ecosystem services; Near-road environment; Passive sampling; Urban trees; Urban vegetation
• DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.014
• ISSN: 0169-2046

•Gaseous pollutant concentrations did not differ between tree-covered and open areas.•Particle pollutant levels were significantly lower in tree-covered areas.•Vegetation-related variables did not explain the difference in particulate levels. The ability of urban vegetation to improve air quality for the benefit of urban residents is often considered fact since plants can absorb and capture air pollutants. However, there is little empirical evidence that urban air quality at the local scale is improved by the presence of, e.g. trees, especially in northern climatic regions. We studied the impact of urban forest vegetation on the levels of five types of air pollutants (NO2, ground-level O3, anthropogenic and biogenic VOCs, and particulate matter) in near-road environments during summer (June) using passive samplers in Helsinki, Finland. Concentrations of gaseous pollutants did not differ significantly between tree-covered and adjacent open areas, while particle pollutant levels were significantly lower in tree-covered areas than in adjacent open, treeless areas. Vegetation-related variables (canopy closure, tree number and size, and ground vegetation) did not explain differences in air quality. Our results suggest that the role of urban, mostly deciduous, vegetation is negligible in improving local air quality, in terms of the anthropogenic pollutants measured here, in northern climates. However, air particulate pollution, which is likely to be dominated by large-sized particles in our study, can be reduced by urban vegetation.