A Semiautomated Method for Quantification of F 18 Florbetapir PET Images

PET amyloid imaging is increasingly used in research trials related to Alzheimer disease and has potential as a quantitative biomarker. This study had 3 objectives: first, to describe a semiautomated quantitative method that does not require subject-specific MR imaging scans for estimating F 18 Flor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 56; no. 11; pp. 1736 - 1741
Main Authors Joshi, Abhinay D., Pontecorvo, Michael J., Lu, Ming, Skovronsky, Daniel M., Mintun, Mark A., Devous, Michael D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society of Nuclear Medicine 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0161-5505
2159-662X
1535-5667
DOI10.2967/jnumed.114.153494

Cover

Abstract PET amyloid imaging is increasingly used in research trials related to Alzheimer disease and has potential as a quantitative biomarker. This study had 3 objectives: first, to describe a semiautomated quantitative method that does not require subject-specific MR imaging scans for estimating F 18 Florbetapir plaque binding using 10-min PET images; second, to evaluate the method's accuracy for identifying positive and negative scans; and third, to correlate derived standardized uptake value ratios to neuropathologic measures of amyloid. The F 18 Florbetapir PET images are initially converted to Montreal Neurologic Institute brain atlas space using an internally developed PET target F 18 Florbetapir template. Subsequently, a single mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (mcSUVr) is calculated from the mean standardized uptake value of 6 cortical regions normalized to a reference region. Four reference regions were explored: whole cerebellum, cerebellar gray matter, pons, and centrum semiovale. The performance of the resultant mcSUVrs were evaluated in 74 young cognitively normal subjects (age < 50 y) with a negligible likelihood of amyloid β pathology, and in 59 deceased subjects with autopsy-based amyloid β neuritic plaque measure who underwent F 18 Florbetapir PET imaging before death. Significant correlations were obtained between mcSUVrs and 3 different pathologic measures of amyloid deposition at autopsy using all 4 reference regions, with the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr correlating most strongly across pathologic measures (r = 0.71-0.75, P < 0.0001). Using the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr and a threshold mcSUVr of less than 1.10, 100% of young cognitively normal subjects were correctly classified as amyloid-negative (mcSUVr range, 0.87-1.08). Similarly, 20 of 20 autopsy-negative subjects showed mcSUVrs of 1.10 or less, whereas 38 of 39 pathology-verified amyloid-positive subjects had mcSUVrs of more than 1.10. This semiautomated F 18 Florbetapir PET quantification method yielded mcSUVrs that significantly correlated with measures of amyloid pathology at autopsy. The method also effectively discriminated autopsy-identified amyloid-positive and -negative cases using a whole-cerebellum mcSUVr threshold of 1.10.
AbstractList PET amyloid imaging is increasingly used in research trials related to Alzheimer disease and has potential as a quantitative biomarker. This study had 3 objectives: first, to describe a semiautomated quantitative method that does not require subject-specific MR imaging scans for estimating F 18 Florbetapir plaque binding using 10-min PET images; second, to evaluate the method's accuracy for identifying positive and negative scans; and third, to correlate derived standardized uptake value ratios to neuropathologic measures of amyloid. The F 18 Florbetapir PET images are initially converted to Montreal Neurologic Institute brain atlas space using an internally developed PET target F 18 Florbetapir template. Subsequently, a single mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (mcSUVr) is calculated from the mean standardized uptake value of 6 cortical regions normalized to a reference region. Four reference regions were explored: whole cerebellum, cerebellar gray matter, pons, and centrum semiovale. The performance of the resultant mcSUVrs were evaluated in 74 young cognitively normal subjects (age < 50 y) with a negligible likelihood of amyloid β pathology, and in 59 deceased subjects with autopsy-based amyloid β neuritic plaque measure who underwent F 18 Florbetapir PET imaging before death. Results: Significant correlations were obtained between mcSUVrs and 3 different pathologic measures of amyloid deposition at autopsy using all 4 reference regions, with the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr correlating most strongly across pathologic measures (r = 0.71-0.75, P < 0.0001). Using the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr and a threshold mcSUVr of less than 1.10, 100% of young cognitively normal subjects were correctly classified as amyloid-negative (mcSUVr range, 0.87-1.08). Similarly, 20 of 20 autopsy-negative subjects showed mcSUVrs of 1.10 or less, whereas 38 of 39 pathology-verified amyloid-positive subjects had mcSUVrs of more than 1.10. This semiautomated F 18 Florbetapir PET quantification method yielded mcSUVrs that significantly correlated with measures of amyloid pathology at autopsy. The method also effectively discriminated autopsy-identified amyloid-positive and -negative cases using a whole-cerebellum mcSUVr threshold of 1.10.
PET amyloid imaging is increasingly used in research trials related to Alzheimer disease and has potential as a quantitative biomarker. This study had 3 objectives: first, to describe a semiautomated quantitative method that does not require subject-specific MR imaging scans for estimating F 18 Florbetapir plaque binding using 10-min PET images; second, to evaluate the method's accuracy for identifying positive and negative scans; and third, to correlate derived standardized uptake value ratios to neuropathologic measures of amyloid. The F 18 Florbetapir PET images are initially converted to Montreal Neurologic Institute brain atlas space using an internally developed PET target F 18 Florbetapir template. Subsequently, a single mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (mcSUVr) is calculated from the mean standardized uptake value of 6 cortical regions normalized to a reference region. Four reference regions were explored: whole cerebellum, cerebellar gray matter, pons, and centrum semiovale. The performance of the resultant mcSUVrs were evaluated in 74 young cognitively normal subjects (age < 50 y) with a negligible likelihood of amyloid β pathology, and in 59 deceased subjects with autopsy-based amyloid β neuritic plaque measure who underwent F 18 Florbetapir PET imaging before death. Significant correlations were obtained between mcSUVrs and 3 different pathologic measures of amyloid deposition at autopsy using all 4 reference regions, with the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr correlating most strongly across pathologic measures (r = 0.71-0.75, P < 0.0001). Using the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr and a threshold mcSUVr of less than 1.10, 100% of young cognitively normal subjects were correctly classified as amyloid-negative (mcSUVr range, 0.87-1.08). Similarly, 20 of 20 autopsy-negative subjects showed mcSUVrs of 1.10 or less, whereas 38 of 39 pathology-verified amyloid-positive subjects had mcSUVrs of more than 1.10. This semiautomated F 18 Florbetapir PET quantification method yielded mcSUVrs that significantly correlated with measures of amyloid pathology at autopsy. The method also effectively discriminated autopsy-identified amyloid-positive and -negative cases using a whole-cerebellum mcSUVr threshold of 1.10.
UNLABELLEDPET amyloid imaging is increasingly used in research trials related to Alzheimer disease and has potential as a quantitative biomarker. This study had 3 objectives: first, to describe a semiautomated quantitative method that does not require subject-specific MR imaging scans for estimating F 18 Florbetapir plaque binding using 10-min PET images; second, to evaluate the method's accuracy for identifying positive and negative scans; and third, to correlate derived standardized uptake value ratios to neuropathologic measures of amyloid.METHODSThe F 18 Florbetapir PET images are initially converted to Montreal Neurologic Institute brain atlas space using an internally developed PET target F 18 Florbetapir template. Subsequently, a single mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (mcSUVr) is calculated from the mean standardized uptake value of 6 cortical regions normalized to a reference region. Four reference regions were explored: whole cerebellum, cerebellar gray matter, pons, and centrum semiovale. The performance of the resultant mcSUVrs were evaluated in 74 young cognitively normal subjects (age < 50 y) with a negligible likelihood of amyloid β pathology, and in 59 deceased subjects with autopsy-based amyloid β neuritic plaque measure who underwent F 18 Florbetapir PET imaging before death.RESULTSSignificant correlations were obtained between mcSUVrs and 3 different pathologic measures of amyloid deposition at autopsy using all 4 reference regions, with the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr correlating most strongly across pathologic measures (r = 0.71-0.75, P < 0.0001). Using the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr and a threshold mcSUVr of less than 1.10, 100% of young cognitively normal subjects were correctly classified as amyloid-negative (mcSUVr range, 0.87-1.08). Similarly, 20 of 20 autopsy-negative subjects showed mcSUVrs of 1.10 or less, whereas 38 of 39 pathology-verified amyloid-positive subjects had mcSUVrs of more than 1.10.CONCLUSIONThis semiautomated F 18 Florbetapir PET quantification method yielded mcSUVrs that significantly correlated with measures of amyloid pathology at autopsy. The method also effectively discriminated autopsy-identified amyloid-positive and -negative cases using a whole-cerebellum mcSUVr threshold of 1.10.
PET amyloid imaging is increasingly used in research trials related to Alzheimer disease and has potential as a quantitative biomarker. This study had 3 objectives: first, to describe a semiautomated quantitative method that does not require subject-specific MR imaging scans for estimating F 18 Florbetapir plaque binding using 10-min PET images; second, to evaluate the method's accuracy for identifying positive and negative scans; and third, to correlate derived standardized uptake value ratios to neuropathologic measures of amyloid. The F 18 Florbetapir PET images are initially converted to Montreal Neurologic Institute brain atlas space using an internally developed PET target F 18 Florbetapir template. Subsequently, a single mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (mcSUVr) is calculated from the mean standardized uptake value of 6 cortical regions normalized to a reference region. Four reference regions were explored: whole cerebellum, cerebellar gray matter, pons, and centrum semiovale. The performance of the resultant mcSUVrs were evaluated in 74 young cognitively normal subjects (age 50 y) with a negligible likelihood of amyloid pathology, and in 59 deceased subjects with autopsy-based amyloid neuritic plaque measure who underwent F 18 Florbetapir PET imaging before death. Results: Significant correlations were obtained between mcSUVrs and 3 different pathologic measures of amyloid deposition at autopsy using all 4 reference regions, with the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr correlating most strongly across pathologic measures (r = 0.71-0.75, P 0.0001). Using the whole-cerebellum mcSUVr and a threshold mcSUVr of less than 1.10, 100% of young cognitively normal subjects were correctly classified as amyloid-negative (mcSUVr range, 0.87-1.08). Similarly, 20 of 20 autopsy-negative subjects showed mcSUVrs of 1.10 or less, whereas 38 of 39 pathology-verified amyloid-positive subjects had mcSUVrs of more than 1.10. This semiautomated F 18 Florbetapir PET quantification method yielded mcSUVrs that significantly correlated with measures of amyloid pathology at autopsy. The method also effectively discriminated autopsy-identified amyloid-positive and -negative cases using a whole-cerebellum mcSUVr threshold of 1.10.
Author Devous, Michael D.
Pontecorvo, Michael J.
Skovronsky, Daniel M.
Joshi, Abhinay D.
Lu, Ming
Mintun, Mark A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Abhinay D.
  surname: Joshi
  fullname: Joshi, Abhinay D.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Michael J.
  surname: Pontecorvo
  fullname: Pontecorvo, Michael J.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ming
  surname: Lu
  fullname: Lu, Ming
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Daniel M.
  surname: Skovronsky
  fullname: Skovronsky, Daniel M.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mark A.
  surname: Mintun
  fullname: Mintun, Mark A.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Michael D.
  surname: Devous
  fullname: Devous, Michael D.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26338898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqN0UFP2zAYBmBrAq0t4wfsMlnahUuKP8eOnSNCLUUCAYJJ3CwnsTdXSdzZzoF_j0vhgjRpJ1-e95P8vgt0NPrRIPQdyJLWlTjfjtNguiUAWwIvWc2-oDkFXhdVRZ-P0JxABQXnhM_QIsYtIaSSUn5FM1qVpZS1nKPNBX40g9NT8oNOpsO3Jv3xHbY-4IdJj8lZ1-rk_Ii9xWsMEq97HxqT9M4FfL96wteD_m3iN3RsdR_N6ft7gn6tV0-Xm-Lm7ur68uKmaJmAVIimEaKznWRECEYtaEoJMMZK3RHBa8pq0I1ps5IgLec5VYrGmg7altC6PEFnh7u74P9OJiY1uNiavtej8VNUICThpGKM_wctCQFRS5rpz09066cw5o_sFeWyKhnJ6se7mppcvNoFN-jwoj7qzEAcQBt8jMFY1br01l4K2vUKiNoPpw7DqTycOgyXk_Ap-XH835lXmGSZSA
CODEN JNMEAQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s13311_023_01405_0
crossref_primary_10_1002_cpt_2875
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_117_200006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2021_102749
crossref_primary_10_14283_jpad_2022_30
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_115_170027
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12194_022_00653_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_inffus_2020_07_006
crossref_primary_10_3389_fninf_2024_1420315
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40336_017_0257_4
crossref_primary_10_1159_000492945
crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_12697
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_181268
crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_aww023
crossref_primary_10_1111_jon_12601
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2017_10_031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurol_2019_01_052
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2024_1422862
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_020_05012_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13311_016_0474_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12010132
crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_13755
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11682_018_9833_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2020_102386
crossref_primary_10_1212_WNL_0000000000004733
crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_aww334
crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2023_13239
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_190264
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_016_3601_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jagp_2016_02_056
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41380_018_0203_5
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20181020
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000001899
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2017_05_016
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_6640054
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_119_228510
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dadm_2018_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11682_018_9869_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jalz_2016_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1177_13872877241283692
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2023_1223697
crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_23622
crossref_primary_10_6009_jjrt_2021_JSRT_77_1_32
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_017_3750_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_018_1236_1
crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000002103
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_200808
crossref_primary_10_1212_WNL_0000000000011521
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_018_4140_y
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1148054
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_170762
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jalz_2017_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_241482
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jalz_2018_06_1353
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_022_05958_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_015_0978_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40658_020_00337_4
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0177924
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_023_01160_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_017_3644_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dadm_2019_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_024_01395_x
crossref_primary_10_23736_S1824_4785_19_03124_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_024_01545_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_trc2_12415
Cites_doi 10.1155/2000/421719
10.2967/jnumed.109.069088
10.1002/hbm.10062
10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:4<238::AID-HBM6>3.0.CO;2-4
10.1007/BF00308809
10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70077-1
10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01232-2
10.1212/01.wnl.0000228230.26044.a4
10.1212/WNL.41.4.479
10.1006/nimg.1999.0431
10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4
10.1001/jama.2010.2008
10.2967/jnumed.112.109009
10.2967/jnumed.111.090340
10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2
10.1002/1097-0193(200007)10:3<120::AID-HBM30>3.0.CO;2-8
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.014
10.1016/1053-8119(92)90006-9
10.1212/01.wnl.0000240117.55680.0a
10.1002/hbm.20345
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Nov 1, 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
– notice: Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Nov 1, 2015
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
4T-
8FD
FR3
K9.
M7Z
NAPCQ
P64
7X8
7QO
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.114.153494
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Docstoc
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Technology Research Database
Docstoc
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Engineering Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2159-662X
1535-5667
EndPage 1741
ExternalDocumentID 3863497441
26338898
10_2967_jnumed_114_153494
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Feature
GroupedDBID 123
18M
41~
5VS
96U
AAYXX
ACGFO
AEGXH
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
GX1
N9A
RHI
TSM
U5U
W8F
---
-~X
.55
.GJ
29L
2WC
3O-
53G
5RE
7RV
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
8WZ
A6W
ABEFU
ABSQV
ABUWG
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADDZX
ADMOG
AENEX
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFOSN
AFRAH
AHMBA
AI.
ALIPV
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F5P
F9R
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
HCIFZ
HMCUK
I-F
IL9
INIJC
J5H
KQ8
L7B
LK8
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M7P
N4W
NAPCQ
NPM
OK1
P2P
P62
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
R0Z
RNS
RWL
S0X
SJN
SV3
TAE
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
VH1
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
YHG
YQJ
ZGI
ZXP
4T-
8FD
FR3
K9.
M7Z
P64
7X8
7QO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb77dfd8407742f1a22014443ad07592491abecb77818f5547137bfed1cc0293
ISSN 0161-5505
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 11:18:51 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 03:30:57 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 10:41:11 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:41:02 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:44 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:45:14 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords florbetapir
quantification
Alzheimer’s
PET
neuropathology
Language English
License 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb77dfd8407742f1a22014443ad07592491abecb77818f5547137bfed1cc0293
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/56/11/1736.full.pdf
PMID 26338898
PQID 1732586340
PQPubID 40808
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1780506445
proquest_miscellaneous_1730017982
proquest_journals_1732586340
pubmed_primary_26338898
crossref_citationtrail_10_2967_jnumed_114_153494
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_114_153494
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Journal of Nuclear Medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate J Nucl Med
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: Society of Nuclear Medicine
References 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.17
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.18
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.19
Lopresti (2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.5) 2005; 46
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.4
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.2
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.3
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.8
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.9
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.6
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.7
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.20
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.10
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.21
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.11
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.22
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.12
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.23
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.13
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.1
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.14
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.15
2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.16
References_xml – ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.16
  doi: 10.1155/2000/421719
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.10
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069088
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.15
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.18
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.13
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:4<238::AID-HBM6>3.0.CO;2-4
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.7
  doi: 10.1007/BF00308809
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.2
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70077-1
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.11
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.1
  doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01232-2
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.6
  doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228230.26044.a4
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.17
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.41.4.479
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.20
  doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0431
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.8
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.4
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.2008
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.22
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.109009
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1959
  year: 2005
  ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.5
  article-title: Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis
  publication-title: J Nucl Med.
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.19
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.090340
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.3
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.12
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0193(200007)10:3<120::AID-HBM30>3.0.CO;2-8
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.21
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.014
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.9
  doi: 10.1016/1053-8119(92)90006-9
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.23
  doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000240117.55680.0a
– ident: 2021051712081737000_56.11.1736.14
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.20345
SSID ssj0006888
ssj0062072
Score 2.4292665
Snippet PET amyloid imaging is increasingly used in research trials related to Alzheimer disease and has potential as a quantitative biomarker. This study had 3...
UNLABELLEDPET amyloid imaging is increasingly used in research trials related to Alzheimer disease and has potential as a quantitative biomarker. This study...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1736
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging
Alzheimer's disease
Amyloidogenic Proteins - metabolism
Amyloidosis - diagnostic imaging
Amyloidosis - pathology
Aniline Compounds
Automation
Autopsy
Biomarkers
Brain
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging
Correlation analysis
Ethylene Glycols
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropathology
Nuclear medicine
Pons - diagnostic imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics & numerical data
Radiopharmaceuticals
Reproducibility of Results
Title A Semiautomated Method for Quantification of F 18 Florbetapir PET Images
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26338898
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1732586340
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1730017982
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1780506445
Volume 56
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfKkBAviG86BjIST0QpcT5s57GCVV2hE0idtLfIdhJpiCVTm0wa_wP_M2c7MSmsE-Mlqhz35PjO59_5fHcIveUySWMa5X4ui8iP4wT0IE-EH-clU0JJFUptKC6P6fwkXpwmp6PRz8GtpbaRE_Xj2riS_-EqtAFfdZTsLTjriEID_Ab-whM4DM9_4vEUlvr5mWibGnAnIMelKQdtbg5-bYW9BuQg4cwj3JuBeS6LRlycrb0vhyvv6Bz0yWYHQj3WuY5Nnp9t__ui3phSwN5U6urbV97HidOwOtkVGLSX9eBOvrdw7z-3tr3bL031r_pyDRNkz3BtxLu3nAxPI0jSheUNDigp8bXVY_cX0waoIvUpNWXTnda16cR76SIDHUpsMEK_H4PJRK7T9WFKtbf5WwXUcp3yeALKO7YVk7fzav-x37lbiGD_aCKZJaHjszNL4g66GzJmvf5Hn9zGTjl3HioaBqYwmPte6zHX9N7_NaRtzLPDkDGAZvUQPej4jKdWrB6hUVE9Rvd6Xj9B8yneki5spQuDdOFt6cJ1iWeYcDyQLgzSha10PUUns8PVh7nf1d3wFUCVxmdSMpaXOdj-YByEJRFhqA3vOBI5IExtsRMBax96AdwrAZAyEjFZFjlRKgD8-AztVXVVvECYFIEqExXbLE5ScpGzVJUFC4iURNExCvqZyVSXlF7XRvme7WTOGL1zf7mwGVlu6nzQT3fWLdxNBgIWJpxGcTBGb9xrUKvaVyaqom5NHw3gUh7e1IcHOt9jnIzRc8tKN6KQRhHnKd-_zWhfovu_19QB2mvWbfEKMG8jXxtJ_AXXBqas
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Semiautomated+Method+for+Quantification+of+F+18+Florbetapir+PET+Images&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Nuclear+Medicine&rft.au=Joshi%2C+Abhinay+D.&rft.au=Pontecorvo%2C+Michael+J.&rft.au=Lu%2C+Ming&rft.au=Skovronsky%2C+Daniel+M.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=2159-662X&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1736&rft.epage=1741&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967%2Fjnumed.114.153494&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2967_jnumed_114_153494
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon