Salinity tolerance in superior genotypes of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, Oreochromis mossambicus and their hybrids

Tilapias are important candidate species for brackish water aquaculture and are increasingly cultured in coastal ponds including in polyculture with shrimp, thus creating a demand for tilapia genotypes well suited to elevated salinities. The Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus dominates freshwater ti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAquaculture Vol. 247; no. 1; pp. 189 - 201
Main Authors Kamal, Abu Hena Md. Mostofa, Mair, Graham C.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 30.06.2005
Elsevier Science
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Tilapias are important candidate species for brackish water aquaculture and are increasingly cultured in coastal ponds including in polyculture with shrimp, thus creating a demand for tilapia genotypes well suited to elevated salinities. The Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus dominates freshwater tilapia culture and has been the subject of recent efforts in genetic improvement but is one of the least salt tolerant tilapia. Oreochromis mossambicus, are more tolerant of high salinity but tend to have lower growth rates. This study compared the culture performance of two strains of genetically improved O. niloticus (GIFT and Fishgen-selected), and two stocks of O. mossambicus (Boesmans and Kasinthula—both newly introduced to Asia directly from southeast Africa) and their hybrids. These comparisons were made over a range of fixed salinities (0, 7.5, 15, 22.5 and 30 ppt) with fish grown for 75 days in cages within concrete tanks with three replicate cages of each genotype at each salinity. Attempts to produce reciprocal hybrids failed due to very low spawning frequency in O. niloticus × O. mossambicus crosses, thus all hybrids were only of O. mossambicus maternal origin. Results for the trials were consistent across replicates and a number of interesting trends were apparent. Overall, growth was higher for all genotypes at elevated salinities with O. niloticus relatively faster growing at low salinity and O. mossambicus at the higher salinities. The hybrids revealed high average positive heterosis for weight gain (1.24) and biomass gain (1.33) but less for FCR (1.08). Regression analyses of relative weight and biomass gain showed highly significant correlations with salinity. The hybrid was superior to O. mossambicus at all salinities and to O. niloticus at salinities above 10 ppt. Survival of O. niloticus was lower than the other genotypes at 22.5 and 30 ppt due to susceptibility to disease and possibly also stress. The implications for the development of tilapia for brackish water aquaculture are discussed.
AbstractList Tilapias are important candidate species for brackish water aquaculture and are increasingly cultured in coastal ponds including in polyculture with shrimp, thus creating a demand for tilapia genotypes well suited to elevated salinities. The Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus dominates freshwater tilapia culture and has been the subject of recent efforts in genetic improvement but is one of the least salt tolerant tilapia. Oreochromis mossambicus, are more tolerant of high salinity but tend to have lower growth rates. This study compared the culture performance of two strains of genetically improved O. niloticus (GIFT and Fishgen-selected), and two stocks of O. mossambicus (Boesmans and Kasinthula—both newly introduced to Asia directly from southeast Africa) and their hybrids. These comparisons were made over a range of fixed salinities (0, 7.5, 15, 22.5 and 30 ppt) with fish grown for 75 days in cages within concrete tanks with three replicate cages of each genotype at each salinity. Attempts to produce reciprocal hybrids failed due to very low spawning frequency in O. niloticus × O. mossambicus crosses, thus all hybrids were only of O. mossambicus maternal origin. Results for the trials were consistent across replicates and a number of interesting trends were apparent. Overall, growth was higher for all genotypes at elevated salinities with O. niloticus relatively faster growing at low salinity and O. mossambicus at the higher salinities. The hybrids revealed high average positive heterosis for weight gain (1.24) and biomass gain (1.33) but less for FCR (1.08). Regression analyses of relative weight and biomass gain showed highly significant correlations with salinity. The hybrid was superior to O. mossambicus at all salinities and to O. niloticus at salinities above 10 ppt. Survival of O. niloticus was lower than the other genotypes at 22.5 and 30 ppt due to susceptibility to disease and possibly also stress. The implications for the development of tilapia for brackish water aquaculture are discussed.
Tilapias are important candidate species for brackish water aquaculture and are increasingly cultured in coastal ponds including in polyculture with shrimp, thus creating a demand for tilapia genotypes well suited to elevated salinities. The Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus dominates freshwater tilapia culture and has been the subject of recent efforts in genetic improvement but is one of the least salt tolerant tilapia. Oreochromis mossambicus, are more tolerant of high salinity but tend to have lower growth rates. This study compared the culture performance of two strains of genetically improved O. niloticus (GIFT and Fishgen-selected), and two stocks of O. mossambicus (Boesmans and Kasinthula--both newly introduced to Asia directly from southeast Africa) and their hybrids. These comparisons were made over a range of fixed salinities (0, 7.5, 15, 22.5 and 30 ppt) with fish grown for 75 days in cages within concrete tanks with three replicate cages of each genotype at each salinity. Attempts to produce reciprocal hybrids failed due to very low spawning frequency in O. niloticus x O. mossambicus crosses, thus all hybrids were only of O. mossambicus maternal origin. Results for the trials were consistent across replicates and a number of interesting trends were apparent. Overall, growth was higher for all genotypes at elevated salinities with O. niloticus relatively faster growing at low salinity and O. mossambicus at the higher salinities. The hybrids revealed high average positive heterosis for weight gain (1.24) and biomass gain (1.33) but less for FCR (1.08). Regression analyses of relative weight and biomass gain showed highly significant correlations with salinity. The hybrid was superior to O. mossambicus at all salinities and to O. niloticus at salinities above 10 ppt. Survival of O. niloticus was lower than the other genotypes at 22.5 and 30 ppt due to susceptibility to disease and possibly also stress. The implications for the development of tilapia for brackish water aquaculture are discussed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Tilapias are important candidate species for brackish water aquaculture and are increasingly cultured in coastal ponds including in polyculture with shrimp, thus creating a demand for tilapia genotypes well suited to elevated salinities. The Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus dominates freshwater tilapia culture and has been the subject of recent efforts in genetic improvement but is one of the least salt tolerant tilapia. Oreochromis mossambicus, are more tolerant of high salinity but tend to have lower growth rates. This study compared the culture performance of two strains of genetically improved O. niloticus (GIFT and Fishgen-selected), and two stocks of O. mossambicus (Boesmans and Kasinthula-both newly introduced to Asia directly from southeast Africa) and their hybrids. These comparisons were made over a range of fixed salinities (0, 7.5, 15, 22.5 and 30 ppt) with fish grown for 75 days in cages within concrete tanks with three replicate cages of each genotype at each salinity. Attempts to produce reciprocal hybrids failed due to very low spawning frequency in O. niloticus x O. mossambicus crosses, thus all hybrids were only of O. mossambicus maternal origin. Results for the trials were consistent across replicates and a number of interesting trends were apparent. Overall, growth was higher for all genotypes at elevated salinities with O. niloticus relatively faster growing at low salinity and O. mossambicus at the higher salinities. The hybrids revealed high average positive heterosis for weight gain (1.24) and biomass gain (1.33) but less for FCR (1.08). Regression analyses of relative weight and biomass gain showed highly significant correlations with salinity. The hybrid was superior to O. mossambicus at all salinities and to O. niloticus at salinities above 10 ppt. Survival of O. niloticus was lower than the other genotypes at 22.5 and 30 ppt due to susceptibility to disease and possibly also stress. The implications for the development of tilapia for brackish water aquaculture are discussed.
Tilapias are important candidate species for brackish water aquaculture and are increasingly cultured in coastal ponds including in polyculture with shrimp, thus creating a demand for tilapia genotypes well suited to elevated salinities. The Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus dominates freshwater tilapia culture and has been the subject of recent efforts in genetic improvement but is one of the least salt tolerant tilapia. Oreochromis mossambicus, are more tolerant of high salinity but tend to have lower growth rates. This study compared the culture performance of two strains of genetically improved O. niloticus (GIFT and Fishgen-selected), and two stocks of O. mossambicus (Boesmans and Kasinthula-both newly introduced to Asia directly from southeast Africa) and their hybrids. These comparisons were made over a range of fixed salinities (0, 7.5, 15, 22.5 and 30 ppt) with fish grown for 75 days in cages within concrete tanks with three replicate cages of each genotype at each salinity. Attempts to produce reciprocal hybrids failed due to very low spawning frequency in O. niloticusxO. mossambicus crosses, thus all hybrids were only of O. mossambicus maternal origin. Results for the trials were consistent across replicates and a number of interesting trends were apparent. Overall, growth was higher for all genotypes at elevated salinities with O. niloticus relatively faster growing at low salinity and O. mossambicus at the higher salinities. The hybrids revealed high average positive heterosis for weight gain (1.24) and biomass gain (1.33) but less for FCR (1.08). Regression analyses of relative weight and biomass gain showed highly significant correlations with salinity. The hybrid was superior to O. mossambicus at all salinities and to O. niloticus at salinities above 10 ppt. Survival of O. niloticus was lower than the other genotypes at 22.5 and 30 ppt due to susceptibility to disease and possibly also stress. The implications for the development of tilapia for brackish water aquaculture are discussed.
Author Mair, Graham C.
Kamal, Abu Hena Md. Mostofa
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Abu Hena Md. Mostofa
  surname: Kamal
  fullname: Kamal, Abu Hena Md. Mostofa
  organization: Aquaculture and Aquatic Resources Management, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Graham C.
  surname: Mair
  fullname: Mair, Graham C.
  email: graham.mair@flinders.edu.au
  organization: School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16885506$$DView record in Pascal Francis
BookMark eNqNkk2LFDEQhhtZwdnV_xAFPdlt5bMzJ5HBL1jYg3oO6XS1k6EnmU3SC_PvzTCL6F52T4HkqSdJ1XvZXIQYsGleU-goUPVh19nbxbplLkvCjgHIDlgHoJ81K6p73krF2EWzAhCi1UKrF81lzjsAUErSVbP8sLMPvhxJiTMmGxwSH0heDph8TOQ3hliOB8wkTqT42R68fU9uEka3TXHvMwl-jsW7Jf-_vY852_1wOiA2jKRs0SeyPQ7Jj_ll83yyc8ZX9-tV8-vL55-bb-31zdfvm0_XrRM9LS23XIEcphGEco5NYnCCUTutJ2Y5p2sNCqUTo5VaokAxAFDHBqd7y-WkLb9q3p29hxRvF8zF1Kc5nGcbMC7ZCNUzoTk8CjJYcw2CPgrSXjHOQVTwzQNwF5cU6m-rTPSiDk9W6O09ZLOz83Tqv8_mkPzepqOhSmspQVXu45lzqbY14WScL7b4GEqyfjYUzCkNZmf-SYM5pcEAMzUN1bB-YPh7yRNqN-darKO685hMdh5rUkaf0BUzRv8Eyx9Uatt1
CODEN AQCLAL
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_22144_ctu_jvn_2016_548
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbd_2015_01_003
crossref_primary_10_22144_ctu_jvn_2016_545
crossref_primary_10_3923_ajas_2015_379_387
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2109_2011_03065_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2109_2012_03256_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11434_006_2136_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aqrep_2024_102267
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbpa_2018_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpcell_00513_2023
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11033_012_2133_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2021_736899
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_6664
crossref_primary_10_3390_life12060787
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aaf_2022_09_002
crossref_primary_10_5657_KFAS_2011_0276
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12431
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaeng_2014_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2025_742203
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2017_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2015_12_012
crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11081356
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2013_09_047
crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes8040176
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2427_2008_02098_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aqrep_2024_102038
crossref_primary_10_1071_MF13161
crossref_primary_10_1021_es1011274
crossref_primary_10_1051_bioconf_20248905002
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0166723
crossref_primary_10_3390_d14020073
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10126_017_9790_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbd_2019_100651
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2021_736763
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_204X2013000800051
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbpc_2023_109577
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_739888
crossref_primary_10_1111_are_13728
crossref_primary_10_3923_pjbs_2018_171_178
crossref_primary_10_1111_jai_12390
crossref_primary_10_1111_fme_12308
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture13030550
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2109_2010_02583_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738718
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10750_018_3572_5
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms26072930
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2007_03485_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aaf_2024_04_005
crossref_primary_10_31398_tpjf_31_2_2023_0050
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbd_2021_100927
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10499_016_0077_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14243617
crossref_primary_10_3957_056_055_0112
crossref_primary_10_1111_are_12224
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00244_012_9825_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738807
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2023_115602
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_5345479
crossref_primary_10_1002_jez_2113
crossref_primary_10_1080_02757540_2024_2357206
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12900
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2109_2009_02402_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_w12072026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygeno_2021_07_016
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1095_8649_2011_03149_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12341
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10499_012_9545_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_are_13667
crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_896_1_012004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2016_09_028
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2109_2010_02542_x
crossref_primary_10_1155_vmi_1253764
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_735542
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10695_012_9707_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2014_03_051
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep07256
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_14_58
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11160_011_9249_z
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2109_2009_02468_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_735433
crossref_primary_10_1080_15287394_2017_1401968
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738626
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2021_736841
crossref_primary_10_2478_aoas_2023_0077
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijbiomac_2020_03_178
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2017_08_035
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_etap_2022_103931
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2020_e05370
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_739729
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsi_2018_08_025
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00343_008_0369_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2021_737805
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_735681
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2022_104968
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2021_115150
crossref_primary_10_5424_sjar_2018164_13222
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_010_9180_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10750_022_04989_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_10454438_2013_834282
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0103_84782011000200027
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12331
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10126_019_09877_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquatox_2012_02_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2024_741310
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2024_742084
crossref_primary_10_1111_lre_12429
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aqrep_2024_102131
crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_718_1_012027
Cites_doi 10.1016/0044-8486(92)90253-H
10.1111/j.1365-2109.1995.tb00869.x
10.1016/0044-8486(83)90174-6
10.1016/0044-8486(90)90027-K
10.1577/1548-8640(1986)48<161:TTOSW>2.0.CO;2
10.1139/f96-282
10.1016/0044-8486(75)90101-5
ContentType Journal Article
Conference Proceeding
Copyright 2005 Elsevier B.V.
2005 INIST-CNRS
Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 30, 2005
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 Elsevier B.V.
– notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 30, 2005
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
7QL
7QR
7ST
7TN
7U7
7U9
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H94
H95
H98
H99
L.F
L.G
M7N
P64
SOI
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Chemoreception Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts
ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Environment Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
AGRICOLA
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1873-5622
EndPage 201
ExternalDocumentID 848051351
16885506
10_1016_j_aquaculture_2005_02_008
S0044848605000888
GeographicLocations INW, Asia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: INW, Asia
GroupedDBID --K
--M
-~X
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
23M
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AABVA
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALCJ
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATLK
AAXUO
AAYJJ
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABGRD
ABJNI
ABKYH
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABRWV
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADQTV
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AESVU
AEXOQ
AFKWA
AFRAH
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BKOMP
BLXMC
BNPGV
CBWCG
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HLV
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LCYCR
LW9
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PQQKQ
Q38
QYZTP
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
RSU
SAB
SCC
SDF
SDG
SES
SEW
SNL
SPCBC
SSA
SSH
SSZ
T5K
WH7
WUQ
Y6R
~G-
~KM
AAHBH
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ACIEU
ACMHX
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADSLC
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGRNS
AGWPP
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
IQODW
7QL
7QR
7ST
7TN
7U7
7U9
8FD
C1K
EFKBS
F1W
FR3
H94
H95
H98
H99
L.F
L.G
M7N
P64
SOI
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-3a3605bfd046cc2f4bc421af9f2a3319806e5c4da585e4e4b001c2bc87a35f8a3
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0044-8486
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 06:14:47 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:04:58 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 17:19:43 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:18:58 EDT 2025
Wed Apr 02 07:18:47 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:00:13 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:33 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:34:33 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Tilapia
Oreochromis niloticus
Hybridization
Oreochromis mossambicus
Salinity tolerance
Hybrid
Tolerance
Environmental factor
Genotype
Salinity
Freshwater environment
Vertebrata
Pisces
Aquaculture
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MeetingName Genetics in Aquaculture VIII: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Genetics in Aquaculture hosted by the University of Chile and held at the city of Puerto Varas, Chile during the week of 9-15 November 2003
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c471t-3a3605bfd046cc2f4bc421af9f2a3319806e5c4da585e4e4b001c2bc87a35f8a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PQID 204740165
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_46724830
proquest_miscellaneous_20938041
proquest_miscellaneous_17623304
proquest_journals_204740165
pascalfrancis_primary_16885506
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2005_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2005_02_008
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2005_02_008
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-06-30
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-06-30
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-06-30
  day: 30
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Amsterdam
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Amsterdam
PublicationTitle Aquaculture
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier Science
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier Science
– name: Elsevier Sequoia S.A
References Anggawa (bib3) 1999
Villegas (bib26) 1990; 85
Vine (bib28) 1980; vol. 2
Stickney (bib23) 1986; 48
FAO Fisheries Department, Fishery Information Data and Statistics Unit, 2002. Fishstat Plus: universal software for fishery statistical time series. Version 2.3.2000.
Popper, Lichatowich (bib22) 1975; 5
Misra, H.R., 1996. Culture performance and sex ratio of interspecific hybrids using
Mair, Abucay, Skibinski, Abella, Beardmore (bib15) 1997; 54
Penman, McAndrew (bib19) 2000
(L.). Ph.D thesis, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Swansea, U.K. 271 pp.
Eknath, Acosta (bib9) 1998
Hulata, Karplus, Harpaz (bib12) 1995; 26
Fitzsimmons (bib11) 2001; 4
Mair (bib13) 2001 (May 28–30)
and
Abucay, Mair (bib1) 2004
Payne (bib17) 1983 (May 8–13)
Payne, Collinson (bib18) 1983; 30
Capili, J.B. (1995) Growth and sex determination in the Nile tilapia
Philippart, Ruwet (bib21) 1982
L. YY-males crossed with
Suresh, Lin (bib24) 1992; 106
Tayamen, Reyes, Danting, Mendoza, Marquez, Salguet, Gonzales, Abella, Vera-Cruz (bib25) 2002; 25
Watanabe, Ellingson, Wicklund, Olla (bib29) 1988
M.Sc. Thesis. Central Luzon State University, Munoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines. 95 pp.
Villegas (bib27) 1990
Agustin, L.Q., 1999. Effects of population bottlenecks on levels of genetic diversity and patterns of differentiation in feral populations of
Ph.D. thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 130 pp.
Phelps, Popma (bib20) 2000
Avault, Shell (bib4) 1968; 44
Eguia (bib8) 1996; 48
Balarin, Haller (bib5) 1982
Brink, Mair, Hoffman, Beardmore (bib6) 2002
Mair (bib14) 2003
Villegas (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib27) 1990
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib16
Eguia (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib8) 1996; 48
Mair (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib14) 2003
Payne (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib17) 1983
Avault (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib4) 1968; 44
Fitzsimmons (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib11) 2001; 4
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib10
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib2
Philippart (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib21) 1982
Brink (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib6) 2002
Eknath (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib9) 1998
Tayamen (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib25) 2002; 25
Vine (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib28) 1980; vol. 2
Mair (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib15) 1997; 54
Villegas (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib26) 1990; 85
Watanabe (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib29) 1988
Suresh (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib24) 1992; 106
Penman (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib19) 2000
Payne (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib18) 1983; 30
Phelps (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib20) 2000
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib7
Mair (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib13) 2001
Popper (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib22) 1975; 5
Anggawa (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib3) 1999
Abucay (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib1) 2004
Balarin (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib5) 1982
Hulata (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib12) 1995; 26
Stickney (10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib23) 1986; 48
References_xml – volume: 48
  start-page: 61
  year: 1986
  end-page: 67
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Tilapia tolerance in saline waters: a review
  publication-title: Progressive Fish Culturist
– start-page: 136
  year: 2001 (May 28–30)
  end-page: 148
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Genetics in tilapia culture
  publication-title: Proceedings of the Tilapia 2001 International Technical and Trade Conference on Tilapia
– start-page: 34
  year: 2000
  end-page: 59
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Sex reversal in tilapia
  publication-title: Tilapia aquaculture in the Americas
– start-page: 227
  year: 2000
  end-page: 266
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Genetics for the management and improvement of cultured tilapias
  publication-title: Tilapias: biology and exploitation
– start-page: 266
  year: 1982
  end-page: 355
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Intensive culture of tilapia in tanks, raceways and cages
  publication-title: Recent advances in aquaculture
– reference: (L.). Ph.D thesis, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Swansea, U.K. 271 pp.
– start-page: 515
  year: 1988
  end-page: 523
  ident: bib29
  article-title: The effects of salinity on growth, food consumption and conversion in juvenile, monosex male Florida Red Tilapia
  publication-title: The Second International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture
– year: 1999
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Polyculture of shrimp and tilapia in east Java
– volume: 5
  start-page: 213
  year: 1975
  end-page: 214
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Preliminary success in predator control of
  publication-title: Aquaculture
– volume: vol. 2
  start-page: 389
  year: 1980
  end-page: 399
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Cultivation of fishes in the Cichlidae in the Red Sea
  publication-title: Proc. Symp. on the Coastal and Marine Environment of the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and Tropical Western Indian Ocean
– volume: 26
  start-page: 765
  year: 1995
  end-page: 772
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Evaluation of some red tilapia strains for aquaculture: growth and colour segregation in hybrid progeny
  publication-title: Aquaculture Research
– reference: . Ph.D. thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 130 pp.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 10
  year: 1996
  end-page: 18
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Reproductive performance of four red tilapia strains in different seed production systems
  publication-title: Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh
– reference: Misra, H.R., 1996. Culture performance and sex ratio of interspecific hybrids using
– reference: L. YY-males crossed with
– start-page: 23
  year: 2003
  end-page: 25
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Hybridisation—more trouble than its worth?
  publication-title: Aquaculture Asia VIII
– reference: FAO Fisheries Department, Fishery Information Data and Statistics Unit, 2002. Fishstat Plus: universal software for fishery statistical time series. Version 2.3.2000.
– start-page: 75
  year: 1998
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias (GIFT) project—final report part 1
  publication-title: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management
– volume: 4
  start-page: 43
  year: 2001
  end-page: 44
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Polyculture of tilapia and penaeid shrimp
  publication-title: Global Aquaculture Advocate
– reference: Agustin, L.Q., 1999. Effects of population bottlenecks on levels of genetic diversity and patterns of differentiation in feral populations of
– volume: 106
  start-page: 201
  year: 1992
  end-page: 226
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Tilapia culture in saline waters: a review
  publication-title: Aquaculture
– start-page: 507
  year: 1990
  end-page: 510
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Growth and survival of
  publication-title: The Second Asian Fisheries Forum (Proceedings of The Second Asian Fisheries Forum, Tokyo, Japan, 17–22 April 1989)
– start-page: 15
  year: 1982
  end-page: 59
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Ecology and distribution of tilapias
  publication-title: The biology and culture of tilapias
– volume: 85
  start-page: 281
  year: 1990
  end-page: 292
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Evaluation of the salinity tolerance of
  publication-title: Aquaculture
– volume: 25
  start-page: 32
  year: 2002
  end-page: 36
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Tilapia broodstock development for saline waters in the Philippines
  publication-title: NAGA-ICLARM Quarterly
– reference: . M.Sc. Thesis. Central Luzon State University, Munoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines. 95 pp.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 237
  year: 1968
  end-page: 242
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Preliminary studies with the hybrid tilapia,
  publication-title: FAO Fisheries Report
– volume: 30
  start-page: 335
  year: 1983
  end-page: 351
  ident: bib18
  article-title: A comparison of biological characteristics of
  publication-title: Aquaculture
– reference: and
– year: 2002
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Genetic improvement and utilisation of indigenous tilapia in southern Africa—final technical report (R 7284)
  publication-title: DFID Aquaculture and Fish Genetics Research Programme
– volume: 54
  start-page: 396
  year: 1997
  end-page: 404
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Genetic manipulation of sex ratio for the large-scale production of all-male tilapia,
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
– start-page: 90
  year: 2004
  end-page: 103
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Divergent selection for growth in the development of a female line for the production of improved genetically male tilapia (GMT)
  publication-title: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture
– reference: Capili, J.B. (1995) Growth and sex determination in the Nile tilapia,
– start-page: 534
  year: 1983 (May 8–13)
  end-page: 543
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Estuarine and salt tolerant tilapias
  publication-title: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture, Nazareth, Israel
– start-page: 136
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib13
  article-title: Genetics in tilapia culture
– start-page: 34
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib20
  article-title: Sex reversal in tilapia
– volume: 4
  start-page: 43
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib11
  article-title: Polyculture of tilapia and penaeid shrimp
  publication-title: Global Aquaculture Advocate
– ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib2
– start-page: 75
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib9
  article-title: Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias (GIFT) project—final report part 1
  publication-title: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management
– start-page: 90
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib1
  article-title: Divergent selection for growth in the development of a female line for the production of improved genetically male tilapia (GMT)
– volume: vol. 2
  start-page: 389
  year: 1980
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib28
  article-title: Cultivation of fishes in the Cichlidae in the Red Sea
– volume: 106
  start-page: 201
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib24
  article-title: Tilapia culture in saline waters: a review
  publication-title: Aquaculture
  doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(92)90253-H
– volume: 26
  start-page: 765
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib12
  article-title: Evaluation of some red tilapia strains for aquaculture: growth and colour segregation in hybrid progeny
  publication-title: Aquaculture Research
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1995.tb00869.x
– start-page: 227
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib19
  article-title: Genetics for the management and improvement of cultured tilapias
– year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib3
– start-page: 266
  year: 1982
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib5
  article-title: Intensive culture of tilapia in tanks, raceways and cages
– volume: 30
  start-page: 335
  year: 1983
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib18
  article-title: A comparison of biological characteristics of Sarotheradon niloticus (L.) with those of S. aureus (Steindachner) and other tilapia of the delta and lower Nile
  publication-title: Aquaculture
  doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(83)90174-6
– start-page: 534
  year: 1983
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib17
  article-title: Estuarine and salt tolerant tilapias
– volume: 85
  start-page: 281
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib26
  article-title: Evaluation of the salinity tolerance of Oreochromis mossambicus, O. niloticus and their F1 hybrids
  publication-title: Aquaculture
  doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(90)90027-K
– start-page: 23
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib14
  article-title: Hybridisation—more trouble than its worth?
  publication-title: Aquaculture Asia VIII
– ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib10
– ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib16
– volume: 48
  start-page: 61
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib23
  article-title: Tilapia tolerance in saline waters: a review
  publication-title: Progressive Fish Culturist
  doi: 10.1577/1548-8640(1986)48<161:TTOSW>2.0.CO;2
– volume: 25
  start-page: 32
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib25
  article-title: Tilapia broodstock development for saline waters in the Philippines
  publication-title: NAGA-ICLARM Quarterly
– start-page: 515
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib29
  article-title: The effects of salinity on growth, food consumption and conversion in juvenile, monosex male Florida Red Tilapia
– start-page: 15
  year: 1982
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib21
  article-title: Ecology and distribution of tilapias
– volume: 48
  start-page: 10
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib8
  article-title: Reproductive performance of four red tilapia strains in different seed production systems
  publication-title: Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh
– volume: 54
  start-page: 396
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib15
  article-title: Genetic manipulation of sex ratio for the large-scale production of all-male tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
  doi: 10.1139/f96-282
– volume: 5
  start-page: 213
  year: 1975
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib22
  article-title: Preliminary success in predator control of Tilapia Mossambica
  publication-title: Aquaculture
  doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(75)90101-5
– start-page: 507
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib27
  article-title: Growth and survival of Oreochromis niloticus, O. mossambicus and their F1 hybrids at various salinities
– ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib7
– volume: 44
  start-page: 237
  issue: 4
  year: 1968
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib4
  article-title: Preliminary studies with the hybrid tilapia, T. nilotica×T. mossambica
  publication-title: FAO Fisheries Report
– year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008_bib6
  article-title: Genetic improvement and utilisation of indigenous tilapia in southern Africa—final technical report (R 7284)
SSID ssj0006651
Score 2.211953
Snippet Tilapias are important candidate species for brackish water aquaculture and are increasingly cultured in coastal ponds including in polyculture with shrimp,...
SourceID proquest
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 189
SubjectTerms Animal aquaculture
animal growth
Animal productions
Aquaculture
Biological and medical sciences
biomass
Brackish
Brackish water
Breeding of animals
Fish
fish culture
Freshwater
freshwater aquaculture
freshwater fish
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Genetic engineering
genetic variation
heterosis
Hybridization
hybrids
interspecific hybridization
Marine
Oreochromis mossambicus
Oreochromis niloticus
salinity
Salinity tolerance
salt stress
salt tolerance
Tilapia
tilapia (common name)
weight gain
Title Salinity tolerance in superior genotypes of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, Oreochromis mossambicus and their hybrids
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.008
https://www.proquest.com/docview/204740165
https://www.proquest.com/docview/17623304
https://www.proquest.com/docview/20938041
https://www.proquest.com/docview/46724830
Volume 247
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELb6kBAIIZ5iW1iMxJHQje04icRlVVEtIMoBKvUW2Y7dBm2TbR6HXvjtzCTOlhVaqRLHOLbjzNgzHnvmG0Le8TDkoCdEIJM4D0RseZBKZcBqdRHTIbeuhxT6dioXZ-LLeXS-Q47HWBh0q_Syf5DpvbT2JUeemkerosAYXzAtMIcSYvqDIbdL9hlPJUzt_fnnr4vTtUCWMhoS5wkRYIN75O2tm5e67tQAcmH9CQsieCbb1NTDlWqAeG7IevGPAO-10slj8shvJ-l8GPETsmPLp-TB_KL2kBr2Gel-KIx-bG9oWy0t9mhpUdKmQ4zjqqaI0ooHsQ2tHG0LjG5T7-n32lbmsq5gGtCyWFaI0dFsFl_BwNWVxhdUlTnt7xzo5Q3GgDXPydnJp5_Hi8AnWwgM6Kc24IoDJbXLwWA2hjmhjWChcqljisM6TWbSRkbkCuwLK6zA3ZZh2iSx4pFLFH9B9sqqtC8J1SrS0sa5YnksTGzSxOGj1qGKEC9vQpKRtpnxSOSYEGOZjS5nv7K_2IKZMqNsxjJgy4SwddPVAMdxl0YfRwZmG3MrA7Vxl-bTDabfflgmCAcnJ-RwnAWZlwANdCAw2aGMJuTN-i0wB-9jVGmrrslCUER4nLS9BpulHAGittcAPcdEwmcH__ePh-R-j0nbO0K-Intt3dnXsNtq9ZTsfvgdTv2a-gOhhy_B
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwELYolfpQVfUpFii4Uo9N2diOk5V6QQi0bYEeChI3y3ZsSLUkSx4HLv3tzOTBdlWthNRjHNtxZjwejz3zDSGfeBhy0BMikEmcBiJ2PJhIbcFq9REzIXe-hRQ6OZXTc_H9IrpYIwdDLAy6VfZrf7emt6t1X7LXU3NvnmUY4wumBeZQQkx_MOQekccCxBel88ufhZ-HlFGXNk-IAKs_IR8XTl76ptEdxIXrz1cQvzNZpaRezHUFpPNdzot_lu9WJx29Ii_7zSTd78b7mqy5_A15vn9Z9oAa7i1pfmmMfaxvaV3MHPboaJbTqkGE46KkiNGKx7AVLTytM4xt05_pz9IV9qosYBLQPJsViNBRLRdfw8D1tcEXVOcpbW8c6NUtRoBV78j50eHZwTToUy0EFrRTHXDNgY7Gp2AuW8u8MFawUPuJZ5qDlCZj6SIrUg3WhRNO4F7LMmOTWPPIJ5q_J-t5kbsNQo2OjHRxqlkaCxvbSeLx0ZhQR4iWNyLJQFtlexxyTIcxU4PD2W_1F1swT2akxkwBW0aE3Tedd2AcD2n0dWCgWppZCpTGQ5rvLDF98WGZIBicHJGtYRaoXv4r6EBgqkMZjcju_VtgDt7G6NwVTaVCUEN4mLS6BhtPOMJDra4BWo6JhI83_-8fd8nT6dnJsTr-dvpjizxr0Wlbl8htsl6XjfsA-67a7LRydQcv0zCF
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.title=Aquaculture&rft.atitle=Salinity+tolerance+in+superior+genotypes+of+tilapia%2C+Oreochromis+niloticus%2C+Oreochromis+mossambicus+and+their+hybrids&rft.au=MOSTOFA+KAMAL%2C+Abu+Hena+Md&rft.au=MAIR%2C+Graham+C&rft.date=2005-06-30&rft.pub=Elsevier+Science&rft.issn=0044-8486&rft.volume=247&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.aquaculture.2005.02.008&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=16885506
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0044-8486&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0044-8486&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0044-8486&client=summon