Fracture Toughness Measurement of Dental Ceramics Using the Indentation Fracture Method with Different Formulas

This study examined fracture toughness (KIC) measurements obtained using the indentation fracture (IF) method with a view to improving their reliability. The KIC values of five dental ceramics were measured using the IF method with five different formulas, and the single-edge precracked beam (SEPB)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDental Materials Journal Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 328 - 334
Main Authors MAEHARA, Satoshi, FUJISHIMA, Akihiro, HOTTA, Yasuhiro, MIYAZAKI, Takashi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices 01.09.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study examined fracture toughness (KIC) measurements obtained using the indentation fracture (IF) method with a view to improving their reliability. The KIC values of five dental ceramics were measured using the IF method with five different formulas, and the single-edge precracked beam (SEPB) method was used as a control. The elastic moduli of the dental ceramics were evaluated by dynamic hardness test. Load conditions of the dental ceramics that produced a median/radial crack for the IF method formulas were investigated. Based on the resultant c/a and P/c1.5 values, the indentation load (P) required for median/radial crack occurrence varied greatly from 29.4 to 196N depending on the ceramic used. Among the five formulas, none of the KIC values obtained by the IF method with Miyoshi's formula differed significantly (p>0.05) from the values obtained using SEPB method. These results suggested that, after an appropriate indentation load is determined, reliable KIC values for small dental ceramic specimens can be easily obtained using the IF method if Miyoshi's formula is used in combination with the dynamic hardness test.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0287-4547
1881-1361
DOI:10.4012/dmj.24.328