Geographic differences in patterns of genetic differentiation among bitter and sweet manioc (Manihot esculenta subsp. esculenta; Euphorbiaceae)

• Published in: American journal of botany Vol. 100; no. 5; pp. 857 - 866
• Main Authors: Bradbury, E. Jane, Duputié, Anne, Delêtre, Marc, Roullier, Caroline, Narváez-Trujillo, Alexandra, Manu-Aduening, Joseph A, Emshwiller, Eve, McKey, Doyle
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Botanical Society of America 01.05.2013; Botanical Society of America, Inc
• Subjects: Africa; Alleles; Bayesian analysis; Botany; Cassava; clones; cluster analysis; Crop management; crop migration; cyanides; cyanogenesis; Demography; domestication; Economic Botany; ethnobotany; Euphorbiaceae; Farmers; farms; Flowers & plants; Food crops; Genetic Variation; Genetics; Genotypes; geographical variation; hybridization; landraces; Manihot - genetics; Manihot esculenta; microsatellite loci; microsatellite repeats; Multivariate analysis; Phylogeography; population structure; roots; small‐holder agriculture; South America; Sustainable agriculture; tropical foods; Ecuador; Gabon; Cameroon; Vanuatu; Ghana; French Guiana; South America; Africa; microsatellite loci; crop management; population structure; cassava; domestication; Euphorbiaceae; crop migration; small-holder agriculture; cyanogenesis
• ISSN: 0002-9122; 1537-2197
• DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200482

• Premise of the study: Manioc (Manihot esculenta subsp. esculenta), one of the most important tropical food crops, is commonly divided according to cyanide content into two use-categories, “sweet” and “bitter.” While bitter and sweet varieties are genetically differentiated at the local scale, whether this differentiation is consistent across continents is yet unknown.• Methods: Using eight microsatellite loci, we genotyped 522 manioc samples (135 bitter and 387 sweet) from Ecuador, French Guiana, Cameroon, Gabon, Ghana, and Vanuatu. Genetic differentiation between use-categories was assessed using double principal coordinate analyses (DPCoA) with multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and Jost’s measure of estimated differentiation (Dest). Genetic structure was analyzed using Bayesian clustering analysis.• Key results: Manioc neutral genetic diversity was high in all sampled regions. Sweet and bitter manioc landraces are differentiated in South America but not in Africa. Correspondingly, bitter and sweet manioc samples share a higher proportion of neutral alleles in Africa than in South America. We also found seven clones classified by some farmers as sweet and by others as bitter.• Conclusions: Lack of differentiation in Africa is most likely due to postintroduction hybridization between bitter and sweet manioc. Inconsistent transfer from South America to Africa of ethnobotanical knowledge surrounding use-category management may contribute to increased hybridization in Africa. Investigating this issue requires more data on the variation in cyanogenesis in roots within and among manioc populations and how manioc diversity is managed on the farm.