Two-Year COMPASS Trial Results: Supraciliary Microstenting with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts

We evaluated 2-year safety and efficacy of supraciliary microstenting (CyPass Micro-Stent; Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) for treating mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Multicenter (24 US sites), interventional randomized clinical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 123; no. 10; pp. 2103 - 2112
Main Authors Vold, Steven, Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K., Craven, E. Randy, Mattox, Cynthia, Stamper, Robert, Packer, Mark, Brown, Reay H., Ianchulev, Tsontcho
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We evaluated 2-year safety and efficacy of supraciliary microstenting (CyPass Micro-Stent; Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) for treating mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Multicenter (24 US sites), interventional randomized clinical trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01085357). Subjects were enrolled beginning July 2011, with study completion in March 2015. Subjects had POAG with mean diurnal unmedicated intraocular pressure (IOP) 21–33 mmHg and were undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery. After completing cataract surgery, subjects were intraoperatively randomized to phacoemulsification only (control) or supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification (microstent) groups (1:3 ratio). Microstent implantation via an ab interno approach to the supraciliary space allowed concomitant cataract and glaucoma surgery. Outcome measures included percentage of subjects achieving ≥20% unmedicated diurnal IOP lowering versus baseline, mean IOP change and glaucoma medication use, and ocular adverse event (AE) incidence through 24 months. Of 505 subjects, 131 were randomized to the control group and 374 were randomized to the microstent group. Baseline mean IOPs in the control and microstent groups were similar: 24.5±3.0 and 24.4±2.8 mmHg, respectively (P > 0.05); mean medications were 1.3±1.0 and 1.4±0.9, respectively (P > 0.05). There was early and sustained IOP reduction, with 60% of controls versus 77% of microstent subjects achieving ≥20% unmedicated IOP lowering versus baseline at 24 months (P = 0.001; per-protocol analysis). Mean IOP reduction was ↓7.4 mmHg for the microstent group versus ↓5.4 mmHg in controls (P < 0.001), with 85% of microstent subjects not requiring IOP medications at 24 months. Mean 24-month medication use was 67% lower in microstent subjects (P < 0.001); 59% of control versus 85% of microstent subjects were medication free. Mean medication use in controls decreased from 1.3±1.0 drugs at baseline to 0.7±0.9 and 0.6±0.8 drugs at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and in the microstent group from 1.4±0.9 to 0.2±0.6 drugs at both 12 and 24 months (P < 0.001 for reductions in both groups at both follow-ups vs. baseline). No vision-threatening microstent-related AEs occurred. Visual acuity was high in both groups through 24 months; >98% of all subjects achieved 20/40 best-corrected visual acuity or better. This RCT demonstrated safe and sustained 2-year reduction in IOP and glaucoma medication use after microinterventional surgical treatment for mild-to-moderate POAG.
AbstractList We evaluated 2-year safety and efficacy of supraciliary microstenting (CyPass Micro-Stent; Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) for treating mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Multicenter (24 US sites), interventional randomized clinical trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01085357). Subjects were enrolled beginning July 2011, with study completion in March 2015. Subjects had POAG with mean diurnal unmedicated intraocular pressure (IOP) 21–33 mmHg and were undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery. After completing cataract surgery, subjects were intraoperatively randomized to phacoemulsification only (control) or supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification (microstent) groups (1:3 ratio). Microstent implantation via an ab interno approach to the supraciliary space allowed concomitant cataract and glaucoma surgery. Outcome measures included percentage of subjects achieving ≥20% unmedicated diurnal IOP lowering versus baseline, mean IOP change and glaucoma medication use, and ocular adverse event (AE) incidence through 24 months. Of 505 subjects, 131 were randomized to the control group and 374 were randomized to the microstent group. Baseline mean IOPs in the control and microstent groups were similar: 24.5±3.0 and 24.4±2.8 mmHg, respectively (P > 0.05); mean medications were 1.3±1.0 and 1.4±0.9, respectively (P > 0.05). There was early and sustained IOP reduction, with 60% of controls versus 77% of microstent subjects achieving ≥20% unmedicated IOP lowering versus baseline at 24 months (P = 0.001; per-protocol analysis). Mean IOP reduction was ↓7.4 mmHg for the microstent group versus ↓5.4 mmHg in controls (P < 0.001), with 85% of microstent subjects not requiring IOP medications at 24 months. Mean 24-month medication use was 67% lower in microstent subjects (P < 0.001); 59% of control versus 85% of microstent subjects were medication free. Mean medication use in controls decreased from 1.3±1.0 drugs at baseline to 0.7±0.9 and 0.6±0.8 drugs at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and in the microstent group from 1.4±0.9 to 0.2±0.6 drugs at both 12 and 24 months (P < 0.001 for reductions in both groups at both follow-ups vs. baseline). No vision-threatening microstent-related AEs occurred. Visual acuity was high in both groups through 24 months; >98% of all subjects achieved 20/40 best-corrected visual acuity or better. This RCT demonstrated safe and sustained 2-year reduction in IOP and glaucoma medication use after microinterventional surgical treatment for mild-to-moderate POAG.
Purpose We evaluated 2-year safety and efficacy of supraciliary microstenting (CyPass Micro-Stent; Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) for treating mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Design Multicenter (24 US sites), interventional randomized clinical trial (RCT) ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01085357 ). Participants Subjects were enrolled beginning July 2011, with study completion in March 2015. Subjects had POAG with mean diurnal unmedicated intraocular pressure (IOP) 21–33 mmHg and were undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Methods After completing cataract surgery, subjects were intraoperatively randomized to phacoemulsification only (control) or supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification (microstent) groups (1:3 ratio). Microstent implantation via an ab interno approach to the supraciliary space allowed concomitant cataract and glaucoma surgery. Main Outcome Measures Outcome measures included percentage of subjects achieving ≥20% unmedicated diurnal IOP lowering versus baseline, mean IOP change and glaucoma medication use, and ocular adverse event (AE) incidence through 24 months. Results Of 505 subjects, 131 were randomized to the control group and 374 were randomized to the microstent group. Baseline mean IOPs in the control and microstent groups were similar: 24.5±3.0 and 24.4±2.8 mmHg, respectively ( P > 0.05); mean medications were 1.3±1.0 and 1.4±0.9, respectively ( P > 0.05). There was early and sustained IOP reduction, with 60% of controls versus 77% of microstent subjects achieving ≥20% unmedicated IOP lowering versus baseline at 24 months ( P  = 0.001; per-protocol analysis). Mean IOP reduction was ↓7.4 mmHg for the microstent group versus ↓5.4 mmHg in controls ( P < 0.001), with 85% of microstent subjects not requiring IOP medications at 24 months. Mean 24-month medication use was 67% lower in microstent subjects ( P  < 0.001); 59% of control versus 85% of microstent subjects were medication free. Mean medication use in controls decreased from 1.3±1.0 drugs at baseline to 0.7±0.9 and 0.6±0.8 drugs at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and in the microstent group from 1.4±0.9 to 0.2±0.6 drugs at both 12 and 24 months ( P < 0.001 for reductions in both groups at both follow-ups vs. baseline). No vision-threatening microstent-related AEs occurred. Visual acuity was high in both groups through 24 months; >98% of all subjects achieved 20/40 best-corrected visual acuity or better. Conclusions This RCT demonstrated safe and sustained 2-year reduction in IOP and glaucoma medication use after microinterventional surgical treatment for mild-to-moderate POAG.
PURPOSEWe evaluated 2-year safety and efficacy of supraciliary microstenting (CyPass Micro-Stent; Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) for treating mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients undergoing cataract surgery.DESIGNMulticenter (24 US sites), interventional randomized clinical trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01085357).PARTICIPANTSSubjects were enrolled beginning July 2011, with study completion in March 2015. Subjects had POAG with mean diurnal unmedicated intraocular pressure (IOP) 21-33 mmHg and were undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery.METHODSAfter completing cataract surgery, subjects were intraoperatively randomized to phacoemulsification only (control) or supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification (microstent) groups (1:3 ratio). Microstent implantation via an ab interno approach to the supraciliary space allowed concomitant cataract and glaucoma surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESOutcome measures included percentage of subjects achieving ≥20% unmedicated diurnal IOP lowering versus baseline, mean IOP change and glaucoma medication use, and ocular adverse event (AE) incidence through 24 months.RESULTSOf 505 subjects, 131 were randomized to the control group and 374 were randomized to the microstent group. Baseline mean IOPs in the control and microstent groups were similar: 24.5±3.0 and 24.4±2.8 mmHg, respectively (P > 0.05); mean medications were 1.3±1.0 and 1.4±0.9, respectively (P > 0.05). There was early and sustained IOP reduction, with 60% of controls versus 77% of microstent subjects achieving ≥20% unmedicated IOP lowering versus baseline at 24 months (P = 0.001; per-protocol analysis). Mean IOP reduction was ↓7.4 mmHg for the microstent group versus ↓5.4 mmHg in controls (P < 0.001), with 85% of microstent subjects not requiring IOP medications at 24 months. Mean 24-month medication use was 67% lower in microstent subjects (P < 0.001); 59% of control versus 85% of microstent subjects were medication free. Mean medication use in controls decreased from 1.3±1.0 drugs at baseline to 0.7±0.9 and 0.6±0.8 drugs at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and in the microstent group from 1.4±0.9 to 0.2±0.6 drugs at both 12 and 24 months (P < 0.001 for reductions in both groups at both follow-ups vs. baseline). No vision-threatening microstent-related AEs occurred. Visual acuity was high in both groups through 24 months; >98% of all subjects achieved 20/40 best-corrected visual acuity or better.CONCLUSIONSThis RCT demonstrated safe and sustained 2-year reduction in IOP and glaucoma medication use after microinterventional surgical treatment for mild-to-moderate POAG.
Author Packer, Mark
Mattox, Cynthia
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
Stamper, Robert
Craven, E. Randy
Brown, Reay H.
Vold, Steven
Ianchulev, Tsontcho
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Steven
  surname: Vold
  fullname: Vold, Steven
  organization: Vold Vision, Fayetteville, Arkansas
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Iqbal Ike K.
  surname: Ahmed
  fullname: Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
– sequence: 3
  givenname: E. Randy
  surname: Craven
  fullname: Craven, E. Randy
  organization: Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Cynthia
  surname: Mattox
  fullname: Mattox, Cynthia
  organization: New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Robert
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9998-7110
  surname: Stamper
  fullname: Stamper, Robert
  organization: Glaucoma Clinic, University of California-San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Mark
  surname: Packer
  fullname: Packer, Mark
  organization: Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Reay H.
  surname: Brown
  fullname: Brown, Reay H.
  organization: Atlanta Ophthalmology Associates, Atlanta, Georgia
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Tsontcho
  surname: Ianchulev
  fullname: Ianchulev, Tsontcho
  email: sean@ianchulev.com
  organization: Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, California
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506486$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqVUt1qFDEYDVKx2-obiOTSm1mTSeaviLAsWoWWXdz1wquQyXzTzZpJpknG0hfwuc267Y0gRfggCTnnhJxzztCJdRYQek3JnBJavtvP3biLOznP02lO0rD8GZrRgjcZryg7QbN0QbOS5-QUnYWwJ4SUJeMv0GleFaTkdTlDv7Z3LvsO0uPl6nq92Gzw1mtp8FcIk4nhAm-m0UuljZb-Hl9r5V2IYKO2N_hOxx1e76RyMEwm6F4rGbWzWFu8TrsEC0fQagSbLeyNAXxp5KTcILG0HV7KKJN6DC_R816aAK8e1nP07dPH7fJzdrW6_LJcXGWKVyRmfQEtlH2vVFu16V9FQzpGWNPXUjHJ2jIv-iKvKsZ72jYtr7u8I7Stq7KjvIOWnaO3R93Ru9sJQhSDDgqMkRbcFAStc8aTRw1N0DcP0KkdoBOj10PyQDx6lwAXR8DBk-ChF0rHPwZEL7URlIhDUGIvjkGJQ1CCpGF5IvO_yI_6T9A-HGmQTPqpwYugks8KOu1BRdE5_b8CymibgjM_4B7C3k3epgAEFSEXRGwOFTo0iJaMFKlASeD9vwWefv83gm_ZzQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaophthalmol_2019_0173
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_023_01844_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_08820538_2022_2086012
crossref_primary_10_1177_2040622319847050
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001608
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftal_2018_10_016
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD012802_pub2
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10078_1264
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2019_07_015
crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_13506
crossref_primary_10_18553_jmcp_2018_17465
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40135_018_0181_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2019_07_016
crossref_primary_10_1177_1120672118801163
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_017_0594_8
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001042
crossref_primary_10_1177_11206721211014381
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10078_1259
crossref_primary_10_1080_17469899_2018_1513327
crossref_primary_10_1080_08820538_2017_1353828
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10078_1410
crossref_primary_10_1159_000501374
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S481318
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001724
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S496631
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftale_2018_10_004
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11226833
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2018_313170
crossref_primary_10_4274_tjo_galenos_2023_60963
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preteyeres_2020_100879
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jnma_2020_09_147
crossref_primary_10_1177_0300060520957447
crossref_primary_10_1177_25158414221147445
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14051639
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_024_02993_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_08820538_2021_1931356
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001554
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000012881
crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_12815
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10078_1266
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_018_0755_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2018_05_012
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_051496
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001716
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000923
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2019_03_006
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0183142
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_018_0131_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yaoo_2017_03_012
crossref_primary_10_17925_USOR_2019_12_1_28
crossref_primary_10_18008_1816_5095_2021_1_61_69
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2017_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2020_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2018_12_011
crossref_primary_10_1097_IIO_0000000000000234
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000001100
crossref_primary_10_1097_IIO_0000000000000195
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40662_020_00190_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_020_01106_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_IIO_0000000000000229
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2018_09_022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2019_04_034
crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_3182935
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yaoo_2020_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10384_020_00781_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2021_10_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2018_11_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2019_03_024
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10384_021_00898_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40942_018_0135_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_APO_0000000000000646
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2017_08_006
crossref_primary_10_15406_aovs_2017_06_00198
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_4c02368
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2021_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2023_12_006
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000002386
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_018_4186_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_12958
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2021_07_008
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2020_316888
crossref_primary_10_18008_1816_5095_2022_1_5_14
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_64_15_26
crossref_primary_10_1089_jop_2018_0036
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000002028
crossref_primary_10_18231_j_ijceo_2022_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2019_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1080_17469899_2017_1362335
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yaoo_2021_04_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2020_10_022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2022_10_021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajoc_2020_100635
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2020_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2217_6851
crossref_primary_10_1097_IIO_0000000000000498
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2018_03_043
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_019_01025_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2022_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2018_10_026
crossref_primary_10_1097_IIO_0000000000000251
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11123492
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2018_10_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftal_2024_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2022_12_010
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S462719
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S409958
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000000835
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001407
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S465828
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_023_02920_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_022_05767_7
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2019_313870
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S256423
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0000000000001173
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2019_315778
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2023_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_88358_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_cts_12660
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_022_02268_z
crossref_primary_10_4103_dljo_dljo_86_23
crossref_primary_10_20517_2574_1225_2020_103
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2019_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_017_0565_0
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_121219_081737
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2019_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_024_00992_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yaoo_2019_04_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajoc_2022_101689
crossref_primary_10_1097_APO_0000000000000260
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000444
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_019_0633_6
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2505_4983
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICO_0000000000001826
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preteyeres_2018_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001632
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2019_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000000825
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjophth_2021_000903
crossref_primary_10_1177_11206721251314532
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2021_03_012
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjo_2022_322536
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000001021
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjophth_2018_000183
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2017_08_018
crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_13724
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_27834
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajoc_2018_02_011
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_0972_1427
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2022_03_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2024_07_030
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000731
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000336
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000457
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000458
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001020
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_jcrs_0000000000000317
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_017_0098_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13164593
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_022_05620_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_APO_0000000000000294
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000002475
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_050992
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13247703
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_jcrs_0000000000000552
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_jcrs_0000000000001365
crossref_primary_10_1080_17469899_2020_1724538
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_019_00214_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000000858
crossref_primary_10_1159_000505491
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftale_2024_07_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_022_05911_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_019_04251_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_018_0745_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2017_07_023
crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_13459
crossref_primary_10_1159_000538411
crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules24203805
crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_14028
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_023_00780_3
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000623
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10078_1248
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_018_0824_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13020508
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2020_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2020_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_019_00947_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_APO_0000000000000561
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogla_2020_12_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2022_07_003
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043
10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.040
10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.046
10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
10.1001/jama.2012.9014
10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025
10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.018
10.1097/IJG.0000000000000134
10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.023
10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031
10.1177/2040622313511286
10.1097/01.ijg.0000212294.31411.92
10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7
10.4137/OED.S4909
10.1097/ICU.0b013e328332f562
10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.051
10.1055/s-0034-1368214
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223
10.4103/2229-3485.83221
10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fe2226
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology
American Academy of Ophthalmology
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology
– notice: American Academy of Ophthalmology
– notice: Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CorporateAuthor CyPass Study Group
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: CyPass Study Group
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1549-4713
EndPage 2112
ExternalDocumentID 27506486
10_1016_j_ophtha_2016_06_032
S0161642016305000
1_s2_0_S0161642016305000
Genre Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
123
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~5
29N
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABCQX
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACNCT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEFWE
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
BELOY
C5W
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
M27
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OF-
OPF
OQ~
P2P
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SDG
SEL
SES
SSZ
UHS
UNMZH
UV1
WH7
X7M
XH2
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
ADPAM
RIG
AAIAV
AGZHU
AHPSJ
ALXNB
ZA5
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f5ebe6ffccb7b420590d3039f8ac3a3b625f527734f1b9b48d2d01b876d14deb3
ISSN 0161-6420
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 02:29:12 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 23:09:35 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:44:07 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:07 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:28:32 EST 2024
Tue Feb 25 20:09:29 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:37:06 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords POAG
PP
FDA
RCT
BCVA
AE
OAG
CI
IOL
ITT
IOP
MIGS
open-angle glaucoma
intraocular pressure
adverse event
intention-to-treat
randomized controlled trial
per-protocol
primary open-angle glaucoma
best-corrected visual acuity
intraocular lens
microinvasive glaucoma surgery
confidence interval
Food and Drug Administration
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c470t-f5ebe6ffccb7b420590d3039f8ac3a3b625f527734f1b9b48d2d01b876d14deb3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0002-9998-7110
PMID 27506486
PQID 1823463491
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1823463491
pubmed_primary_27506486
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ophtha_2016_06_032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2016_06_032
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ophtha_2016_06_032
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0161642016305000
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ophtha_2016_06_032
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
PublicationTitleAlternate Ophthalmology
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Hoeh, Vold, Ahmed (bib13) 2016; 25
Le, Saheb (bib21) 2014; 8
Brandão, Grieshaber (bib9) 2013; 2013
Sambhara, Aref (bib4) 2014; 5
Kapetanakis, Chan, Foster (bib3) 2016; 100
Pfeiffer, Garcia-Feijoo, Martinez-de-la-Casa (bib23) 2015; 122
Nordstrom, Friedman, Mozaffari (bib5) 2005; 140
Saheb, Ahmed (bib8) 2012; 23
Höh, Grisanti, Grisanti (bib14) 2014; 231
Craven, Katz, Wells, Giamporcaro (bib22) 2012; 38
Tseng, Yu, Lum, Coleman (bib11) 2012; 308
Mathalone, Hyams, Neiman (bib20) 2005; 31
Hoeh, Ahmed, Grisanti (bib15) 2013; 39
Gupta (bib16) 2011; 2
Landers, Martin, Sarkies (bib10) 2012; 119
Vizzeri, Weinreb (bib17) 2010; 21
Slabaugh, Bojikian, Moore, Chen (bib19) 2014; 157
Tham, Li, Wong (bib2) 2014; 121
Razeghinejad, Spaeth (bib7) 2011; 88
García-Feijoo, Rau, Grisanti (bib12) 2015; 159
Shingleton, Pasternack, Hung, O'Donoghue (bib18) 2006; 15
Crawley, Zamir, Cordeiro, Guo (bib6) 2012; 4
Resnikoff, Pascolini, Etya'ale (bib1) 2004; 82
Saheb (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib8) 2012; 23
Slabaugh (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib19) 2014; 157
Kapetanakis (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib3) 2016; 100
Gupta (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib16) 2011; 2
Tham (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib2) 2014; 121
Tseng (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib11) 2012; 308
Resnikoff (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib1) 2004; 82
García-Feijoo (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib12) 2015; 159
Le (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib21) 2014; 8
Razeghinejad (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib7) 2011; 88
Shingleton (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib18) 2006; 15
Pfeiffer (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib23) 2015; 122
Vizzeri (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib17) 2010; 21
Nordstrom (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib5) 2005; 140
Mathalone (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib20) 2005; 31
Craven (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib22) 2012; 38
Brandão (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib9) 2013; 2013
Sambhara (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib4) 2014; 5
Crawley (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib6) 2012; 4
Hoeh (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib13) 2016; 25
Landers (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib10) 2012; 119
Höh (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib14) 2014; 231
Hoeh (10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib15) 2013; 39
References_xml – volume: 31
  start-page: 479
  year: 2005
  end-page: 483
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Long-term intraocular pressure control after clear corneal phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
– volume: 39
  start-page: 431
  year: 2013
  end-page: 437
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Early postoperative safety and surgical outcomes after implantation of a suprachoroidal micro-stent for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma concomitant with cataract surgery
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1937
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1945
  ident: bib21
  article-title: iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent for open-angle glaucoma
  publication-title: Clin Ophthalmol
– volume: 159
  start-page: 1075
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1081
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Supraciliary micro-stent implantation for open-angle glaucoma failing topical therapy: 1-year results of a multicenter study
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
– volume: 122
  start-page: 1283
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1293
  ident: bib23
  article-title: A randomized trial of a Schlemm's canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
– volume: 88
  start-page: E39
  year: 2011
  end-page: E47
  ident: bib7
  article-title: A history of the surgical management of glaucoma
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1339
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1345
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
– volume: 231
  start-page: 377
  year: 2014
  end-page: 381
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Two-year clinical experience with the CyPass Micro-Stent: safety and surgical outcomes of a novel supraciliary micro-stent
  publication-title: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd
– volume: 5
  start-page: 30
  year: 2014
  end-page: 43
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Glaucoma management: relative value and place in therapy of available drug treatments
  publication-title: Ther Adv Chronic Dis
– volume: 157
  start-page: 26
  year: 2014
  end-page: 31
  ident: bib19
  article-title: The effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in medically controlled open-angle glaucoma patients
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
– volume: 308
  start-page: 493
  year: 2012
  end-page: 501
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Risk of fractures following cataract surgery in Medicare beneficiaries
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 140
  start-page: 598
  year: 2005
  end-page: 606
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
– volume: 2013
  start-page: 705915
  year: 2013
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Update on minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) and new implants
  publication-title: J Ophthalmol
– volume: 4
  start-page: 43
  year: 2012
  end-page: 64
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Clinical options for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure
  publication-title: Ophthalmol Eye Dis
– volume: 25
  start-page: 106
  year: 2016
  end-page: 112
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Initial clinical experience with the CyPass Micro-Stent: Safety and surgical outcomes of a novel supraciliary microstent
  publication-title: J Glaucoma
– volume: 21
  start-page: 20
  year: 2010
  end-page: 24
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Cataract surgery and glaucoma
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
– volume: 121
  start-page: 2081
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2090
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
– volume: 100
  start-page: 86
  year: 2016
  end-page: 93
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
– volume: 2
  start-page: 109
  year: 2011
  end-page: 112
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Intention-to-treat concept: a review
  publication-title: Perspect Clin Res
– volume: 15
  start-page: 494
  year: 2006
  end-page: 498
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Three and five year changes in intraocular pressures after clear corneal phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and normal patients
  publication-title: J Glaucoma
– volume: 119
  start-page: 694
  year: 2012
  end-page: 702
  ident: bib10
  article-title: A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
– volume: 23
  start-page: 96
  year: 2012
  end-page: 104
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
– volume: 82
  start-page: 844
  year: 2004
  end-page: 851
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
– volume: 119
  start-page: 694
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib10
  article-title: A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043
– volume: 39
  start-page: 431
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib15
  article-title: Early postoperative safety and surgical outcomes after implantation of a suprachoroidal micro-stent for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma concomitant with cataract surgery
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.040
– volume: 31
  start-page: 479
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib20
  article-title: Long-term intraocular pressure control after clear corneal phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.046
– volume: 121
  start-page: 2081
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib2
  article-title: Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
– volume: 308
  start-page: 493
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib11
  article-title: Risk of fractures following cataract surgery in Medicare beneficiaries
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9014
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1339
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib22
  article-title: Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025
– volume: 159
  start-page: 1075
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib12
  article-title: Supraciliary micro-stent implantation for open-angle glaucoma failing topical therapy: 1-year results of a multicenter study
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.018
– volume: 25
  start-page: 106
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib13
  article-title: Initial clinical experience with the CyPass Micro-Stent: Safety and surgical outcomes of a novel supraciliary microstent
  publication-title: J Glaucoma
  doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000134
– volume: 157
  start-page: 26
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib19
  article-title: The effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in medically controlled open-angle glaucoma patients
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.023
– volume: 122
  start-page: 1283
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib23
  article-title: A randomized trial of a Schlemm's canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031
– volume: 5
  start-page: 30
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib4
  article-title: Glaucoma management: relative value and place in therapy of available drug treatments
  publication-title: Ther Adv Chronic Dis
  doi: 10.1177/2040622313511286
– volume: 82
  start-page: 844
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib1
  article-title: Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
– volume: 15
  start-page: 494
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib18
  article-title: Three and five year changes in intraocular pressures after clear corneal phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and normal patients
  publication-title: J Glaucoma
  doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212294.31411.92
– volume: 23
  start-page: 96
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib8
  article-title: Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7
– volume: 4
  start-page: 43
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib6
  article-title: Clinical options for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure
  publication-title: Ophthalmol Eye Dis
  doi: 10.4137/OED.S4909
– volume: 21
  start-page: 20
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib17
  article-title: Cataract surgery and glaucoma
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328332f562
– volume: 140
  start-page: 598
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib5
  article-title: Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.051
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1937
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib21
  article-title: iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent for open-angle glaucoma
  publication-title: Clin Ophthalmol
– volume: 231
  start-page: 377
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib14
  article-title: Two-year clinical experience with the CyPass Micro-Stent: safety and surgical outcomes of a novel supraciliary micro-stent
  publication-title: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd
  doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368214
– volume: 100
  start-page: 86
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib3
  article-title: Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223
– volume: 2013
  start-page: 705915
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib9
  article-title: Update on minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) and new implants
  publication-title: J Ophthalmol
– volume: 2
  start-page: 109
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib16
  article-title: Intention-to-treat concept: a review
  publication-title: Perspect Clin Res
  doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.83221
– volume: 88
  start-page: E39
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032_bib7
  article-title: A history of the surgical management of glaucoma
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fe2226
SSID ssj0006634
Score 2.5940511
Snippet We evaluated 2-year safety and efficacy of supraciliary microstenting (CyPass Micro-Stent; Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) for treating...
Purpose We evaluated 2-year safety and efficacy of supraciliary microstenting (CyPass Micro-Stent; Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) for treating...
PURPOSEWe evaluated 2-year safety and efficacy of supraciliary microstenting (CyPass Micro-Stent; Transcend Medical, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) for treating...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 2103
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cataract - complications
Ciliary Body - surgery
Female
Filtering Surgery - methods
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - complications
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - surgery
Gonioscopy
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Male
Middle Aged
Miniaturization
Ophthalmology
Phacoemulsification - methods
Postoperative Period
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Time Factors
Tonometry, Ocular
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
Title Two-Year COMPASS Trial Results: Supraciliary Microstenting with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0161642016305000
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0161642016305000
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506486
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1823463491
Volume 123
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9NAEF5FqYR4QdyES4vEW-TId2zeogrUEoVGSQrlaeW1d0mK4xRsC8EP4J_xv5i9XAdS2vJiWZbXx87nncPfzCD0ktkRj6IssbIkBQfFc1OL8pBbDuiCAMx7HqYiwXnyLjw49t-eBCedzq8Wa6mu6CD9sTOv5H-kCsdAriJL9hqSbS4KB2Af5AtbkDBsrybjbxvro6jEs380mY7m8_5C9uCYsbLOK8l1m9ciDWqVrwQ5biLIdyBV1RxCRmCnS1gR2brOS0EZSgzzcaqqrerUN0E6sUbFp1yQM5Ia3kQmconsQVntuWxbuEdny2qZ5GtV20kGKHRPLsXSL4pBK_rwXjetVs3VGvQt1yoGe_hFVCs5_Mz640Hzt0Q0TFJRo0F_Bs_R4jFXlW6b_L2olqukHdJwwoYc10Q5Q8cCx8jeWqZVXrLBo7216tpeS4ODT-vu1A4qUHE62MiZELy-UBZv1RHWrWLcfyjJhrpoWHGnRF2FiKsQQQ70wBLYc8FbcbtobzSefRg3JgGYdbrIvHovk8MpiYZ_P81FNtJFPpC0hRa30S3txOCRQuQd1GHFXXRjomka99BPA0ysgYklMLEG5ivchiXegiUWiMM7YIlXBTawVCedwxIbWGKAA25geR8dv3m92D-wdMMPK_WHdmXxAJaUkPM0pUMK0xTEdgYmVsyjJPUSj4KvzgOYYc_nDo2pH2VuZjsUFHrm-Bmj3gPULTYFe4RwHLEs9TkfxmBh24xSTh0KwEgoH3Iv8nrIM1NMUl0NXzRlycm_BNxDVjPqTFWDueT8wEiPmExn0M0EAHnJuOGucazUi09JHFK6xBbczNARiAK3yha9TdojtQ2tbOMr3POFgRcBFSP-GyYF29Rwr8j1fEBw7PTQQ4W75u1Fe4jQj8LH15yZJ-jm-Zf_FHWrrzV7BuZ9RZ_rj-c37dv95A
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two-Year+COMPASS+Trial+Results%3A+Supraciliary+Microstenting+with+Phacoemulsification+in+Patients+with+Open-Angle+Glaucoma+and+Cataracts&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology+%28Rochester%2C+Minn.%29&rft.au=Vold%2C+Steven&rft.au=Ahmed%2C+Iqbal+Ike+K.&rft.au=Craven%2C+E.+Randy&rft.au=Mattox%2C+Cynthia&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2103&rft.epage=2112&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ophtha.2016.06.032&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_ophtha_2016_06_032
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F01616420%2FS0161642016X00085%2Fcov150h.gif