Discriminative validity of the Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire among five curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

Previous studies of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 discriminative validity have lacked sufficiently matched study groups and were limited to a comparison with three or fewer subgroups of disease severity. To evaluate the discriminative validity of SRS-22 by assessing the questionnaire'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe spine journal Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 127 - 133
Main Authors Berliner, Jonathan L., Verma, Kushagra, Lonner, Baron S., Penn, Phedra U., Bharucha, Neil J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1529-9430
1878-1632
1878-1632
DOI10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Previous studies of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 discriminative validity have lacked sufficiently matched study groups and were limited to a comparison with three or fewer subgroups of disease severity. To evaluate the discriminative validity of SRS-22 by assessing the questionnaire's ability to discriminate among five groups of pretreatment adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with increasing curve severity. Retrospective review of prospectively administered surveys. Two hundred eighty-six SRS-22 questionnaires were issued to two AIS pretreatment patient populations: 67 nonoperative and 219 preoperative. Study subjects were separated into five subgroups depending on the major Cobb angle (nonoperative 0°–19° and 20°–40° and preoperative 41°–50°, 51°–60°, and >60°). Each group (n=31) was matched for age (within 1 year) and sex (23 females and 8 males), resulting in a total of 155 study subjects. Analysis of variance was used to determine statistically significant differences (p<.05) between the five subgroups' domains and total scores. Significant differences between study groups were found within two of the four domains (pain and image) and the total score. Both nonoperative groups (0°–19° and 20°–40°) demonstrated significantly less pain than the preoperative group (41°–50°) and significantly better self-image than all three preoperative groups. Both nonoperative groups' total scores were significantly higher than all three preoperative groups' scores, with the exception of the 20° to 40° subgroup versus the >60° subgroup. No significant differences were found between groups within the same planned treatment category. The SRS-22 questionnaire demonstrated good discriminative validity between small nonoperative curves and larger surgical curves within the pain, image, and total domains. However, SRS-22 lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limitation to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity. The discriminative validity of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 has not been clearly defined. Our analysis of 155 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients evaluates the instrument's discriminative validity among five age- and sex-matched curve-severity subgroups. The SRS-22 questionnaire lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limit to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity.
AbstractList Previous studies of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 discriminative validity have lacked sufficiently matched study groups and were limited to a comparison with three or fewer subgroups of disease severity. To evaluate the discriminative validity of SRS-22 by assessing the questionnaire's ability to discriminate among five groups of pretreatment adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with increasing curve severity. Retrospective review of prospectively administered surveys. Two hundred eighty-six SRS-22 questionnaires were issued to two AIS pretreatment patient populations: 67 nonoperative and 219 preoperative. Study subjects were separated into five subgroups depending on the major Cobb angle (nonoperative 0°-19° and 20°-40° and preoperative 41°-50°, 51°-60°, and >60°). Each group (n=31) was matched for age (within 1 year) and sex (23 females and 8 males), resulting in a total of 155 study subjects. Analysis of variance was used to determine statistically significant differences (p<.05) between the five subgroups' domains and total scores. Significant differences between study groups were found within two of the four domains (pain and image) and the total score. Both nonoperative groups (0°-19° and 20°-40°) demonstrated significantly less pain than the preoperative group (41°-50°) and significantly better self-image than all three preoperative groups. Both nonoperative groups' total scores were significantly higher than all three preoperative groups' scores, with the exception of the 20° to 40° subgroup versus the >60° subgroup. No significant differences were found between groups within the same planned treatment category. The SRS-22 questionnaire demonstrated good discriminative validity between small nonoperative curves and larger surgical curves within the pain, image, and total domains. However, SRS-22 lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limitation to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity. The discriminative validity of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 has not been clearly defined. Our analysis of 155 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients evaluates the instrument's discriminative validity among five age- and sex-matched curve-severity subgroups. The SRS-22 questionnaire lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limit to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity.
Previous studies of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 discriminative validity have lacked sufficiently matched study groups and were limited to a comparison with three or fewer subgroups of disease severity.BACKGROUND CONTEXTPrevious studies of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 discriminative validity have lacked sufficiently matched study groups and were limited to a comparison with three or fewer subgroups of disease severity.To evaluate the discriminative validity of SRS-22 by assessing the questionnaire's ability to discriminate among five groups of pretreatment adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with increasing curve severity.PURPOSETo evaluate the discriminative validity of SRS-22 by assessing the questionnaire's ability to discriminate among five groups of pretreatment adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with increasing curve severity.Retrospective review of prospectively administered surveys.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective review of prospectively administered surveys.Two hundred eighty-six SRS-22 questionnaires were issued to two AIS pretreatment patient populations: 67 nonoperative and 219 preoperative. Study subjects were separated into five subgroups depending on the major Cobb angle (nonoperative 0°-19° and 20°-40° and preoperative 41°-50°, 51°-60°, and >60°). Each group (n=31) was matched for age (within 1 year) and sex (23 females and 8 males), resulting in a total of 155 study subjects. Analysis of variance was used to determine statistically significant differences (p<.05) between the five subgroups' domains and total scores.METHODSTwo hundred eighty-six SRS-22 questionnaires were issued to two AIS pretreatment patient populations: 67 nonoperative and 219 preoperative. Study subjects were separated into five subgroups depending on the major Cobb angle (nonoperative 0°-19° and 20°-40° and preoperative 41°-50°, 51°-60°, and >60°). Each group (n=31) was matched for age (within 1 year) and sex (23 females and 8 males), resulting in a total of 155 study subjects. Analysis of variance was used to determine statistically significant differences (p<.05) between the five subgroups' domains and total scores.Significant differences between study groups were found within two of the four domains (pain and image) and the total score. Both nonoperative groups (0°-19° and 20°-40°) demonstrated significantly less pain than the preoperative group (41°-50°) and significantly better self-image than all three preoperative groups. Both nonoperative groups' total scores were significantly higher than all three preoperative groups' scores, with the exception of the 20° to 40° subgroup versus the >60° subgroup. No significant differences were found between groups within the same planned treatment category.RESULTSSignificant differences between study groups were found within two of the four domains (pain and image) and the total score. Both nonoperative groups (0°-19° and 20°-40°) demonstrated significantly less pain than the preoperative group (41°-50°) and significantly better self-image than all three preoperative groups. Both nonoperative groups' total scores were significantly higher than all three preoperative groups' scores, with the exception of the 20° to 40° subgroup versus the >60° subgroup. No significant differences were found between groups within the same planned treatment category.The SRS-22 questionnaire demonstrated good discriminative validity between small nonoperative curves and larger surgical curves within the pain, image, and total domains. However, SRS-22 lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limitation to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity. The discriminative validity of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 has not been clearly defined. Our analysis of 155 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients evaluates the instrument's discriminative validity among five age- and sex-matched curve-severity subgroups. The SRS-22 questionnaire lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limit to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity.CONCLUSIONSThe SRS-22 questionnaire demonstrated good discriminative validity between small nonoperative curves and larger surgical curves within the pain, image, and total domains. However, SRS-22 lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limitation to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity. The discriminative validity of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 has not been clearly defined. Our analysis of 155 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients evaluates the instrument's discriminative validity among five age- and sex-matched curve-severity subgroups. The SRS-22 questionnaire lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limit to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity.
Abstract Background context Previous studies of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 discriminative validity have lacked sufficiently matched study groups and were limited to a comparison with three or fewer subgroups of disease severity. Purpose To evaluate the discriminative validity of SRS-22 by assessing the questionnaire's ability to discriminate among five groups of pretreatment adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with increasing curve severity. Study design Retrospective review of prospectively administered surveys. Methods Two hundred eighty-six SRS-22 questionnaires were issued to two AIS pretreatment patient populations: 67 nonoperative and 219 preoperative. Study subjects were separated into five subgroups depending on the major Cobb angle (nonoperative 0°–19° and 20°–40° and preoperative 41°–50°, 51°–60°, and >60°). Each group (n=31) was matched for age (within 1 year) and sex (23 females and 8 males), resulting in a total of 155 study subjects. Analysis of variance was used to determine statistically significant differences (p<.05) between the five subgroups' domains and total scores. Results Significant differences between study groups were found within two of the four domains (pain and image) and the total score. Both nonoperative groups (0°–19° and 20°–40°) demonstrated significantly less pain than the preoperative group (41°–50°) and significantly better self-image than all three preoperative groups. Both nonoperative groups' total scores were significantly higher than all three preoperative groups' scores, with the exception of the 20° to 40° subgroup versus the >60° subgroup. No significant differences were found between groups within the same planned treatment category. Conclusions The SRS-22 questionnaire demonstrated good discriminative validity between small nonoperative curves and larger surgical curves within the pain, image, and total domains. However, SRS-22 lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limitation to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity. The discriminative validity of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 has not been clearly defined. Our analysis of 155 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients evaluates the instrument's discriminative validity among five age- and sex-matched curve-severity subgroups. The SRS-22 questionnaire lacked the ability to differentiate between small intervals of curve magnitude, suggesting a limit to the questionnaire's discriminative capacity.
Author Penn, Phedra U.
Verma, Kushagra
Berliner, Jonathan L.
Lonner, Baron S.
Bharucha, Neil J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jonathan L.
  surname: Berliner
  fullname: Berliner, Jonathan L.
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University-Hospital for Joint Diseases, 820 Second Ave., New York, NY 10017, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kushagra
  surname: Verma
  fullname: Verma, Kushagra
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St, Curtis Building, Suite 810, Philadelphia, PA, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Baron S.
  surname: Lonner
  fullname: Lonner, Baron S.
  email: BLonner@nyc.rr.com
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University-Hospital for Joint Diseases, 820 Second Ave., New York, NY 10017, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Phedra U.
  surname: Penn
  fullname: Penn, Phedra U.
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University-Hospital for Joint Diseases, 820 Second Ave., New York, NY 10017, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Neil J.
  surname: Bharucha
  fullname: Bharucha, Neil J.
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University-Hospital for Joint Diseases, 820 Second Ave., New York, NY 10017, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23218828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqVkl2L1DAUhousuB_6D0Ry6U3HJM22qYgg6_oBC4Kz9yFNT3cydpKak1bml_h3N3F2bgRZvEnC4T3PIe97zosT5x0UxUtGV4yy-s12hZN1ACtOGU-lFeWXT4ozJhtZsrriJ-l9yduyFRU9Lc4Rt5RS2TD-rDjlFWdScnlW_P5o0QS7s05HuwBZ9Gh7G_fEDyRugKyNH61Hi-Q7IOhgNmTtjYWk4Jz8nAGj9c5pG4DonXd3ZMgYM4cFSoQFQobh3N0FP0-Ysbr3I6ABF5H8snFD0kA_6bixhuBx3PPi6aBHhBcP90Vx--n69upLefPt89erDzelEQ2NpWlrVjes56CpNHKgDDrRUiEpdLKpJXR1PzS94W3dSS6EbjpJZdW3rRB9RauL4vUBOwX_5zNql_yAcdQO_IyKVUw0jNWCJ-mrB-nc7aBXU3JNh706epkEbw8CEzxigEEZG3W2JwZtR8WoysGprToEp3JwuZqCS83ir-Yj_5G294c2SB4tFoLCFI4z0KdATFS9t_8LMKN11ujxB-wBt34OLvmvmEKuqFrnlcobxRIkndnBd_8GPD7_HkYv4M0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_021_04189_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000000546
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000000623
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000003969
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000004948
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000003289
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43390_022_00480_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2014_12_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43390_024_00875_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_ejihpe12030023
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_022_07428_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0b013e3182893c01
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000001082
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ccm_2014_02_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prrv_2022_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_016_4857_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ridd_2014_01_020
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000002004
crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_L_00867
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43390_020_00150_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jspd_2018_05_009
crossref_primary_10_1097_BPO_0000000000002497
crossref_primary_10_1186_1477_7525_12_81
Cites_doi 10.1097/01.brs.0000162284.38214.53
10.1097/00007632-199209000-00014
10.1097/01241398-200107000-00002
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b9c9c0
10.1097/01.BRS.0000084666.53553.D6
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cabe75
10.1097/00007632-200007150-00010
10.1038/oby.2002.155
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af28bf
10.1097/00007632-200301010-00016
10.1097/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c61fd7
10.1097/00007632-199909010-00010
10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015
10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.157
10.1097/00007632-200009150-00018
10.1097/00007632-200209150-00015
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb474f
10.1001/jama.282.12.1157
10.1097/00007632-200404150-00008
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0466
10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31903-9
10.3109/ort.1969.40.suppl-118.01
10.1097/00007632-199907150-00008
10.1097/00005053-200212000-00001
10.1016/j.nec.2007.03.001
10.1097/00007632-200209150-00013
10.2106/00004623-200007000-00010
10.1097/00007632-200301010-00017
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Physical Therapy
EISSN 1878-1632
EndPage 133
ExternalDocumentID 23218828
10_1016_j_spinee_2012_10_025
S1529943012013010
1_s2_0_S1529943012013010
Genre Validation Studies
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8P~
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OF~
OR-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UHS
UV1
Z5R
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-c961671d2ea08c8f01eb490480eb8768eb6df7dc296b8244a7b8083d9944d303
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 1529-9430
1878-1632
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 11:28:39 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:56:35 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:30:07 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:27:44 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:53 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 19:00:52 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Discriminant validity
Discriminative validity
SRS-22
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c470t-c961671d2ea08c8f01eb490480eb8768eb6df7dc296b8244a7b8083d9944d303
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 23218828
PQID 1314711642
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1314711642
pubmed_primary_23218828
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_spinee_2012_10_025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2012_10_025
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_spinee_2012_10_025
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1529943012013010
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_spinee_2012_10_025
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The spine journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Spine J
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Parent, Hill, Mahood (bib9) 2006; 123
Johnson (bib29) 1994; 25
Parent, Dang, Hill (bib23) 2010; 35
Watanabe, Hasegawa, Hirano (bib12) 2005; 30
Horal (bib28) 1969; 118
Wilson, Newton, Wenger (bib11) 2002; 27
D'Andrea, Betz, Lenke (bib15) 2000; 25
Baldus, Bridwell, Harrast (bib20) 2008; 33
Asher, Lai, Burton (bib13) 2002; 91
Asher, Min Lai, Burton (bib6) 2003; 28
Pencharz, Young, Owen (bib30) 2001; 21
Berven SH, Deviren V, Polly DW. Minimal clinically important difference in spinal deformity: defining a threshold of change that matters. Paper presented at: Scoliosis Research Society 40th Annual Meeting, Poster 4. 2005; Miami, FL.
Taylor, Taylor, Foy (bib26) 1999; 24
Asher, Lai, Burton (bib33) 2004; 29
Merola, Haher, Brkaric (bib16) 2002; 27
Asher, Lai, Glattes (bib7) 2006; 31
Asher, Min Lai, Burton (bib4) 2003; 28
Fischer, Stewart, Bloch (bib25) 1999; 282
Pehrsson, Larsson, Oden (bib1) 1992; 17
Parent, Moreau, Mahood (bib24) 2006; 49
Berven, Deviren, Demir-Deviren (bib21) 2003; 28
Verma, Lonner, Hoashi (bib27) 2010; 35
Haher, Gorup, Shin (bib2) 1999; 24
Auerbach J, Lonner B, Crerand C, et al. Body image in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validation of the body image disturbance questionnaire-scoliosis version. Scoliosis Research Society Annual Meeting, Kyoto, Japan, 2010, Podium Presentation.
Burton, Glattes (bib8) 2007; 18
de Zwaan, Mitchell, Howell (bib32) 2002; 10
Gaynes, Burns, Tweed (bib31) 2002; 190
Asher, Min Lai, Burton (bib3) 2000; 25
Weinstein (bib22) 2000; 82
Parent, Hill, Mahood (bib14) 2009; 34
Cobb (bib17) 1948; 5
Carreon, Sanders, Diab (bib19) 2010; 35
Parent, Wong, Hill (bib10) 2010; 35
Asher, Min Lai, Burton (bib5) 2003; 28
D'Andrea (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib15) 2000; 25
Asher (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib3) 2000; 25
de Zwaan (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib32) 2002; 10
Asher (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib4) 2003; 28
Watanabe (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib12) 2005; 30
Burton (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib8) 2007; 18
Fischer (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib25) 1999; 282
Parent (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib10) 2010; 35
Verma (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib27) 2010; 35
Asher (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib7) 2006; 31
Asher (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib13) 2002; 91
Parent (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib23) 2010; 35
Asher (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib6) 2003; 28
Parent (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib9) 2006; 123
Parent (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib24) 2006; 49
Merola (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib16) 2002; 27
Cobb (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib17) 1948; 5
Johnson (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib29) 1994; 25
Pehrsson (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib1) 1992; 17
Carreon (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib19) 2010; 35
Parent (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib14) 2009; 34
Baldus (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib20) 2008; 33
Asher (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib33) 2004; 29
Wilson (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib11) 2002; 27
Gaynes (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib31) 2002; 190
Weinstein (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib22) 2000; 82
Taylor (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib26) 1999; 24
10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib34
Haher (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib2) 1999; 24
Horal (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib28) 1969; 118
Berven (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib21) 2003; 28
Pencharz (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib30) 2001; 21
10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib18
Asher (10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib5) 2003; 28
References_xml – volume: 91
  start-page: 462
  year: 2002
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Spine deformity correlates better than trunk deformity with idiopathic scoliosis patients' quality of life questionnaire responses
  publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2450
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2457
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Discriminative and predictive validity of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in management and curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 35
  start-page: 568
  year: 2010
  end-page: 577
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Score distribution of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in subgroups of patients of all ages with idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1805
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1812
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 35
  start-page: 315
  year: 2010
  end-page: 322
  ident: bib10
  article-title: The association between Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores and scoliosis severity changes at a clinically relevant threshold
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1091
  year: 1992
  end-page: 1096
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis. A study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1795
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1802
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1197
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1201
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part I: comparison with nonscoliosis group: preliminary/limited review in a Japanese population
  publication-title: Spine
– reference: Auerbach J, Lonner B, Crerand C, et al. Body image in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validation of the body image disturbance questionnaire-scoliosis version. Scoliosis Research Society Annual Meeting, Kyoto, Japan, 2010, Podium Presentation.
– volume: 5
  start-page: 261
  year: 1948
  end-page: 275
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Outline for the study of scoliosis, instructional course lectures
  publication-title: J Am Acad Orthop Surg
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2214
  year: 2008
  end-page: 2218
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: are all SRS domains disease specific?
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 28
  start-page: 74
  year: 2003
  end-page: 78
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size
  publication-title: Spine
– reference: Berven SH, Deviren V, Polly DW. Minimal clinically important difference in spinal deformity: defining a threshold of change that matters. Paper presented at: Scoliosis Research Society 40th Annual Meeting, Poster 4. 2005; Miami, FL.
– volume: 49
  year: 2006
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Score distribution and discriminative validity of quality of life scores in patients with idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: J Can Chir
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2134
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2139
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Demographic factors affect Scoliosis Research Society-22 performance in healthy adolescents: a comparative baseline for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 82
  start-page: 980
  year: 2000
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Long-term follow-up of pediatric orthopaedic conditions: natural history and outcomes of treatment
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2079
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2083
  ident: bib19
  article-title: The minimum clinically important difference in Scoliosis Research Society-22 appearance, activity, and pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1435
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1440
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1
  year: 1969
  end-page: 109
  ident: bib28
  article-title: The clinical appearance of low back disorders in the city of Gothenburg, Sweden. Comparisons of incapacitated probands with matched controls
  publication-title: Acta Orthop Scand Suppl
– volume: 18
  start-page: 403
  year: 2007
  end-page: 405
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Measuring outcomes in spinal deformity
  publication-title: Neurosurg Clin N Am
– volume: 31
  start-page: 593
  year: 2006
  end-page: 597
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 29
  start-page: 861
  year: 2004
  end-page: 868
  ident: bib33
  article-title: The influence of spine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients' health-related quality of life questionnaire responses
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 123
  start-page: 357
  year: 2006
  end-page: 363
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Associations between quality-of-life and internal or external spinal deformity measurements in adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)
  publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform
– volume: 190
  start-page: 799
  year: 2002
  end-page: 806
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Depression and health-related quality of life
  publication-title: J Nerv Ment Dis
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2381
  year: 2000
  end-page: 2386
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2036
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2040
  ident: bib11
  article-title: A multicenter study analyzing the relationship of a standardized radiographic scoring system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 282
  start-page: 1157
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1162
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure
  publication-title: J Am Med Assoc
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2164
  year: 2003
  end-page: 2169
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 28
  start-page: 70
  year: 2003
  end-page: 73
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 25
  start-page: 205
  year: 1994
  end-page: 213
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Outcomes analysis in spinal research. How clinical research differs from outcomes analysis
  publication-title: Orthop Clin North Am
– volume: 21
  start-page: 425
  year: 2001
  end-page: 432
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Comparison of three outcomes instruments in children
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1143
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1151
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Two measures of health-related quality of life in morbid obesity
  publication-title: Obes Res
– volume: 28
  start-page: 63
  year: 2003
  end-page: 69
  ident: bib4
  article-title: The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2046
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2051
  ident: bib16
  article-title: A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1197
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib12
  article-title: Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part I: comparison with nonscoliosis group: preliminary/limited review in a Japanese population
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000162284.38214.53
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1091
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib1
  article-title: Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis. A study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199209000-00014
– volume: 21
  start-page: 425
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib30
  article-title: Comparison of three outcomes instruments in children
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop
  doi: 10.1097/01241398-200107000-00002
– volume: 91
  start-page: 462
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib13
  article-title: Spine deformity correlates better than trunk deformity with idiopathic scoliosis patients' quality of life questionnaire responses
  publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform
– volume: 35
  start-page: 568
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib23
  article-title: Score distribution of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in subgroups of patients of all ages with idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b9c9c0
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2164
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib21
  article-title: Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084666.53553.D6
– volume: 35
  start-page: 315
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib10
  article-title: The association between Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores and scoliosis severity changes at a clinically relevant threshold
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cabe75
– ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib18
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1795
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib15
  article-title: Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00010
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1143
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib32
  article-title: Two measures of health-related quality of life in morbid obesity
  publication-title: Obes Res
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.155
– volume: 123
  start-page: 357
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib9
  article-title: Associations between quality-of-life and internal or external spinal deformity measurements in adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)
  publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2450
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib14
  article-title: Discriminative and predictive validity of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in management and curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af28bf
– volume: 28
  start-page: 70
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib5
  article-title: Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00016
– volume: 31
  start-page: 593
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib7
  article-title: Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2079
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib19
  article-title: The minimum clinically important difference in Scoliosis Research Society-22 appearance, activity, and pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c61fd7
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1805
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib26
  article-title: Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00010
– volume: 28
  start-page: 63
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib4
  article-title: The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015
– ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib34
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.157
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2381
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib3
  article-title: Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00018
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2046
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib16
  article-title: A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209150-00015
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2134
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib27
  article-title: Demographic factors affect Scoliosis Research Society-22 performance in healthy adolescents: a comparative baseline for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb474f
– volume: 282
  start-page: 1157
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib25
  article-title: Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure
  publication-title: J Am Med Assoc
  doi: 10.1001/jama.282.12.1157
– volume: 29
  start-page: 861
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib33
  article-title: The influence of spine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients' health-related quality of life questionnaire responses
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00008
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2214
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib20
  article-title: Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: are all SRS domains disease specific?
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0466
– volume: 25
  start-page: 205
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib29
  article-title: Outcomes analysis in spinal research. How clinical research differs from outcomes analysis
  publication-title: Orthop Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31903-9
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1
  year: 1969
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib28
  article-title: The clinical appearance of low back disorders in the city of Gothenburg, Sweden. Comparisons of incapacitated probands with matched controls
  publication-title: Acta Orthop Scand Suppl
  doi: 10.3109/ort.1969.40.suppl-118.01
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1435
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib2
  article-title: Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907150-00008
– volume: 5
  start-page: 261
  year: 1948
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib17
  article-title: Outline for the study of scoliosis, instructional course lectures
  publication-title: J Am Acad Orthop Surg
– volume: 190
  start-page: 799
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib31
  article-title: Depression and health-related quality of life
  publication-title: J Nerv Ment Dis
  doi: 10.1097/00005053-200212000-00001
– volume: 18
  start-page: 403
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib8
  article-title: Measuring outcomes in spinal deformity
  publication-title: Neurosurg Clin N Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2007.03.001
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2036
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib11
  article-title: A multicenter study analyzing the relationship of a standardized radiographic scoring system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209150-00013
– volume: 49
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib24
  article-title: Score distribution and discriminative validity of quality of life scores in patients with idiopathic scoliosis
  publication-title: J Can Chir
– volume: 82
  start-page: 980
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib22
  article-title: Long-term follow-up of pediatric orthopaedic conditions: natural history and outcomes of treatment
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-200007000-00010
– volume: 28
  start-page: 74
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025_bib6
  article-title: Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00017
SSID ssj0008712
Score 2.1491148
Snippet Previous studies of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 discriminative validity have lacked sufficiently matched study groups and were limited to a...
Abstract Background context Previous studies of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 discriminative validity have lacked sufficiently matched study groups...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 127
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Child
Discriminant validity
Discriminative validity
Female
Humans
Male
Orthopedics
Quality of Life
Retrospective Studies
Scoliosis - diagnosis
Severity of Illness Index
SRS-22
Surveys and Questionnaires
Title Discriminative validity of the Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire among five curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1529943012013010
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1529943012013010
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.025
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23218828
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1314711642
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBbp5tJL349N0qBCr8pasla2jyFN2LY0FLKF3IQly-AS7CXa7bF_I383M7K0pDQlpVdjebSa0TefVvMg5ENlqxYgz7DMiJzJuiqZKeqCOSVsI5RxMsN856_navFdfr6cX-6Qk5QLg2GVEftHTA9oHZ_M4mrOVl03uwDPU2HxcC7w9g3TrHZFXqn5hOwef_qyON8CMpwJwqUnvM9wQMqgC2FefoVV_zDGSxxhmBf2zL7fQ_2NgQZPdPaMPIkUkh6Ps3xOdlz_gjz9FhecLsc6AS_JzccOMQFjXRDTKNhU1wDppkNLgfbRC7CBbvCdpyn8jsYYTioEDXMApfU1LBANPYloi5-xm-ufjsF0Hfa9o35jQmaIx8_eqQ9F8R9eCgKH0PTYUp_EvSLLs9PlyYLFPgzMyiJbM1sprgreCFdnpS3bjDsjK0xGdwbAtHRGNW3RWFEpUwJdqAtTArNrQDuyARf5mkz6oXdvCbVSWgugIpWsJW-dsarOc9sCrYGjcsOnJE9Lr22sUY6tMq50Ckb7oUeFaVQYPgWFTQnbjlqNNToeeH-etKpT_ikgpgYn8sC44r5xzsdt7zXXXuhM_2Gad0f-Zt3_IPN9MjsNGx9vc-reDRuQlXMgFnDaFVPyZrTH7a8Hmszh6FTu_bfcffJYhMYfGLhzQCbr6417B_RrbQ7Jo6Nf_DBusls5VDHy
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwELYQPdBLH_TB9gGu1KvZ2PE6ybGiRdsWUCW2EjcrdhwpCCUrvNtj_0b_bmccG6gKouo1sjOOZzz-HH8zQ8j7ylYtuDzDMiNyJuuqZKaoC-aUsI1QxskM452PT9T8u_xyNjvbIAcpFgZpldH3jz49eOv4ZBpnc7rsuukp7DwVJg_nAm_fMMzqgZzlBfL69n9e8zzgRBCuPKE1w-Ypfi6QvPwSc_4hw0vsI8kLK2bfvj_dhT_DPnT4hDyKAJJ-GMf4lGy4fps8_hanmy7GLAHPyK-PHXoEZLqgR6NgUV0DkJsOLQXQR0_BArrBd54m8h2NDE4qBA1jAJX1NUwPDRWJaIuvsevLH47BcB1WvaN-bUJciMfX3sgORfH_LgWBQyh5bKlP4p6TxeGnxcGcxSoMzMoiWzFbKa4K3ghXZ6Ut24w7IysMRXcGXGnpjGraorGiUqYEsFAXpgRc14BuZAMb5Auy2Q-92yHUSmktuBSpZC1564xVdZ7bFkANHJQbPiF5mnptY4ZyLJRxoRMV7VyPCtOoMHwKCpsQdtVrOWbouKf9LGlVp-hT8JcatpB7-hW39XM-LnqvufZCZ_ovw7zZ8w_b_geZ75LZaVj2eJdT925Yg6ycA6yAs66YkJejPV59PYBkDgen8tV_y90jW_PF8ZE--nzy9TV5KEIJEKTwvCGbq8u1ewtAbGV2w0L7DdzwMr0
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discriminative+validity+of+the+Scoliosis+Research+Society+22+questionnaire+among+five+curve-severity+subgroups+of+adolescents+with+idiopathic+scoliosis&rft.jtitle=The+spine+journal&rft.au=Berliner%2C+Jonathan+L.&rft.au=Verma%2C+Kushagra&rft.au=Lonner%2C+Baron+S.&rft.au=Penn%2C+Phedra+U.&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.spinee.2012.10.025&rft.externalDocID=S1529943012013010
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F15299430%2FS1529943012X00044%2Fcov150h.gif