Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature

Purpose To describe the epidemiology and prevalence, rates of progression, difference between adult and pediatric populations, and therapeutic approaches to pediatric keratoconus from documented literature. Methods A literature search was done on PubMed using key words including pediatric keratoconu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational ophthalmology Vol. 38; no. 5; pp. 2257 - 2266
Main Authors Mukhtar, Sabrina, Ambati, Balamurali K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.10.2018
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To describe the epidemiology and prevalence, rates of progression, difference between adult and pediatric populations, and therapeutic approaches to pediatric keratoconus from documented literature. Methods A literature search was done on PubMed using key words including pediatric keratoconus, children with keratoconus, adult keratoconus, penetrating keratoplasty, corneal cross-linking and intracorneal ring segments. The literature was reviewed and reported to explore the key epidemiological differences between the pediatric and adult population with regards to presentation and treatment options. Results Pediatric keratoconus is more aggressive than adult keratoconus, which has been explained by structural differences in the cornea between both populations. High rates of progression were documented in pediatric populations. While corneal collagen cross-linking, intracorneal ring segments and penetrating keratoplasties have been used as therapies in the pediatric population, the literature overwhelmingly shows higher rates of failure and progression despite these measures as compared to adults. Conclusion Pediatric keratoconus is more aggressive than adult keratoconus, and current therapies used in adults may not be sufficient for the pediatric population.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Literature Review-3
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-5701
1573-2630
1573-2630
DOI:10.1007/s10792-017-0699-8