Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla

Objectives To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Methods Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean radiology Vol. 23; no. 11; pp. 2969 - 2978
Main Authors Brown, Ryan, Storey, Pippa, Geppert, Christian, McGorty, KellyAnne, Leite, Ana Paula Klautau, Babb, James, Sodickson, Daniel K., Wiggins, Graham C., Moy, Linda
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.11.2013
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0938-7994
1432-1084
1432-1084
DOI10.1007/s00330-013-2972-1

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objectives To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Methods Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements. Results Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm 3 ), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P  ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T ( P  < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation. Conclusion The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T. Key Points • High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity.
AbstractList To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements. Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm(3)), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation. The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T. • High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity.
To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements.METHODSSeventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements.Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm(3)), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation.RESULTSImage scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm(3)), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation.The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T.CONCLUSIONThe 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T.• High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity.KEY POINTS• High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity.
To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements. Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1×1.1×1.1-1.6 mm^sup 3^), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P≤0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P<0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation. The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T. * High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. * 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. * Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. * 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. * The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Objectives To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Methods Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements. Results Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm 3 ), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P  ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T ( P  < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation. Conclusion The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T. Key Points • High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity.
Author Brown, Ryan
Leite, Ana Paula Klautau
Storey, Pippa
Wiggins, Graham C.
Sodickson, Daniel K.
Geppert, Christian
Babb, James
Moy, Linda
McGorty, KellyAnne
AuthorAffiliation 1 Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
2 Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., New York, NY, United States
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
– name: 2 Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., New York, NY, United States
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ryan
  surname: Brown
  fullname: Brown, Ryan
  email: ryan.brown@nyumc.org
  organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Pippa
  surname: Storey
  fullname: Storey, Pippa
  organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Christian
  surname: Geppert
  fullname: Geppert, Christian
  organization: Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc
– sequence: 4
  givenname: KellyAnne
  surname: McGorty
  fullname: McGorty, KellyAnne
  organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ana Paula Klautau
  surname: Leite
  fullname: Leite, Ana Paula Klautau
  organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 6
  givenname: James
  surname: Babb
  fullname: Babb, James
  organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Daniel K.
  surname: Sodickson
  fullname: Sodickson, Daniel K.
  organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Graham C.
  surname: Wiggins
  fullname: Wiggins, Graham C.
  organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Linda
  surname: Moy
  fullname: Moy, Linda
  organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23896763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Uttu1DAQtVAR3S58AC_IEi-8BMZ2Eic8IEHFpVIRElqeLa8z2XWVjVPbacV39Af6LXwZTrOLSiV48khzzvGZmXNCjnrXIyHPGbxmAPJNABACMmAi47XkGXtEFiwXqYAqPyILqEWVybrOj8lJCBcAULNcPiHHXFR1KUuxIDcfPOoQ6dfvZ1RHKn_drjB0ml7buKWarm2nI3rdUeNsR3Xf0BXLrtFuthEbqs3laION1vUzw7v1mNTaJBXGYfAYQuq9pXanN0jxSnejvkNPSsbtBu1tOJDF_vOn5HGru4DP9u-S_Pj0cXX6JTv_9vns9P15ZnIJMZNlxUuQsm51y1EwXIMsWjBtUZRpPXXBtG5q4I2QJs1bVLyqONMIrNV5U3GxJO9m3WFc77Ax2Mc0qRp8cut_Kqet-rvT263auCuVgygZhyTwai_g3eWIIaqdDQa7TvfoxqBYngtRQ1lO0JcPoBdu9H0ab0IBq4RIl1uSF_cd_bFyuFcCyBlgvAvBY6uMjXcbTQZtpxioKRlqToZKyVBTMhRLTPaAeRD_H4fPnJCw_Qb9PdP_JP0GbqnMjw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_013_3075_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_nbm_3272
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2015_12_012
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_24573
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20160715
crossref_primary_10_1002_nbm_4039
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12194_014_0278_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLI_0000000000000183
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2015_2403850
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_014_2889_7
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_15141905
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_25424
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_25304
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_84616_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_26651
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00256_014_1818_5
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40064_015_1654_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00117_013_2580_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_27829
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0113969
Cites_doi 10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002
10.1148/radiol.12110619
10.1007/PL00006908
10.1016/S0959-8049(12)70169-7
10.1002/jmri.23719
10.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003
10.1002/mrm.22771
10.2214/AJR.08.2128
10.1002/mrm.10675
10.1097/RLI.0b013e31820df706
10.1002/mrm.1910380524
10.1002/nbm.2868
10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.005
10.1002/mrm.1910180211
10.1002/jmri.22018
10.2214/AJR.10.4889
10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.017
10.1148/radiol.2373041672
10.1148/radiol.2443070266
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright European Society of Radiology 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: European Society of Radiology 2013
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QO
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
NAPCQ
P5Z
P62
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1007/s00330-013-2972-1
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Technology collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biological Science Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Central Student

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-1084
EndPage 2978
ExternalDocumentID PMC4036120
3093267331
23896763
10_1007_s00330_013_2972_1
Genre Comparative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations New York
United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: New York
– name: United States--US
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 EB002568
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
04C
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29G
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACREN
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADOJX
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEAQA
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGVAE
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARAPS
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBNVY
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGLVJ
BGNMA
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECF
ECT
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
H13
HCIFZ
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I-F
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
LAS
LK8
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
M7P
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NAPCQ
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P62
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
RNS
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UDS
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOW
YLTOR
Z45
Z7R
Z7U
Z7X
Z7Y
Z7Z
Z82
Z83
Z85
Z87
Z88
Z8M
Z8O
Z8R
Z8S
Z8T
Z8V
Z8W
Z8Z
Z91
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
ADHKG
ADKFA
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
ABRTQ
AZQEC
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
K9.
P64
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
PUEGO
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-768260779faf2e31eb075f0cf556100951aad902d37c3895828821ae01fa4d823
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0938-7994
1432-1084
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:34:55 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 05:44:17 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:09:37 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:31:21 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:07:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:36 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:32:59 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords High-field MRI
Breast cancer
Fat suppression
RF coil array
Bilateral breast imaging
Language English
License http://www.springer.com/tdm
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c470t-768260779faf2e31eb075f0cf556100951aad902d37c3895828821ae01fa4d823
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4036120
PMID 23896763
PQID 1440183314
PQPubID 54162
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4036120
proquest_miscellaneous_1443390660
proquest_journals_1440183314
pubmed_primary_23896763
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00330_013_2972_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_013_2972_1
springer_journals_10_1007_s00330_013_2972_1
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationTitle European radiology
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eur Radiol
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur Radiol
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References KuhlCKBreast MR imaging at 3TMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2007153153201789305210.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003
AzlanCADi GiovanniPAhearnTSSempleSIGilbertFJRedpathTWB1 transmission-field inhomogeneity and enhancement ratio errors in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast at 3TJ Magn Reson Imaging2010312342392002759410.1002/jmri.22018
Fautz HP, Vogel M, Gross P, Kerr A, Zhu Y (2008) B1 mapping of coil arrays for parallel transmission ISMRM, Toronto, Ontario, pp 1247
GloverGHSchneiderEThree-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correctionMagn Reson Med199118371383204651810.1002/mrm.19101802111:STN:280:DyaK3M3mtVCjsQ%3D%3D
HancuILeeSKDixonWTField shaping arrays: a means to address shading in high field breast MRIJ Magn Reson Imaging2012368658722273024210.1002/jmri.23719
Brown R, Storey P, McGorty K et al (2012) Toward improved T1-weighted breast imaging at 7T: preliminary results and comparison with 3T ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 2981
TozakiMFukumaE1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy?AJR Am J Roentgenol20091938408491969630010.2214/AJR.08.2128
KortewegMAVeldhuisWBVisserFFeasibility of 7 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging determination of intrinsic sensitivity and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapyInvestig Radiol20114637037610.1097/RLI.0b013e31820df7061:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXlslSrsbw%3D
Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Luijten PR et al (2012) Feasibility of contrast-enhanced and high-resolution 7 Tesla MRI in patients with suspicious breast lesions ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1474
KrautmacherCWillinekWATschampaHJBrain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T—initial experienceRadiology2005237101410191623714210.1148/radiol.2373041672
Sung K, Daniel BL, Hargreaves BA. Transmit B1+ field inhomogeneity and T1 estimation errors in breast DCE-MRI at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging
ElsterADHow much contrast is enough? dependence of enhancement on field strength and MR pulse sequenceEur Radiol19977276280937055910.1007/PL00006908
BaltzerPADietzelMBurmeisterHPApplication of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective studyAm J Roentgenol2011196W641W64710.2214/AJR.10.4889
UmutluLMaderwaldSKraffODynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI at 7 Tesla utilizing a single-loop coil: a feasibility trialAcad Radiol201017105010562059915810.1016/j.acra.2010.03.017
Lee RF, Moy L, Brown R et al (2006) 7T high resolution breast MRI ISMRM, Seattle, WA, pp 2900
ConstantinidesCDAtalarEMcVeighERSignal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arraysMagn Reson Med199738852857935846210.1002/mrm.19103805241:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fitlaquw%3D%3D
KuhlCKKooijmanHGiesekeJSchildHHEffect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 TRadiology20072449299301770984310.1148/radiol.2443070266
NnewiheANGrafendorferTDanielBLCustom-fitted 16-channel bilateral breast coil for bidirectional parallel imagingMagn Reson Med2011662812892128759310.1002/mrm.22771
StehouwerBLKlompDWKortewegMA7 T versus 3T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experienceMagn Reson Imaging2013316136172311684810.1016/j.mri.2012.09.005
Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Luijten PR, Mali WPTM, van den Bosch MAAJ, Veldhuis WB (2012) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 7T and 3T; initial results of an intra-individual comparison of BI-RADS-MRI lesion assessment ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1485
Zaric O, Pinker K, Gruber S et al (2013) Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast at 7T – ready for clinical application? ISMRM, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp 196
Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Korteweg MA et al. 7 T versus 3 T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experience. Magn Reson Imaging
LazebnikMPopovicDMcCartneyLA large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeriesPhys Med Biol200752609361151792157410.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002
ReederSBWenZYuHMulticoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation methodMagn Reson Med20045135451470504310.1002/mrm.106751:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVSisro%3D
van de BankBLVoogtIJItaliaanderMUltra high spatial and temporal resolution breast imaging at 7TNMR Biomed20132636737510.1002/nbm.2868
Brown R, McGorty K, Moy L, DeGregorio S, Sodickson DK, Wiggins GC (2011) Sub-millimeter breast imaging and relaxivity characterization at 7T ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, pp 3092
MahoneyMCGatsonisCHannaLDeMartiniWBLehmanCPositive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imagingRadiology201226451582258932010.1148/radiol.12110619
2972_CR1
2972_CR2
PA Baltzer (2972_CR15) 2011; 196
2972_CR9
2972_CR25
CD Constantinides (2972_CR17) 1997; 38
CK Kuhl (2972_CR3) 2007; 15
2972_CR7
MC Mahoney (2972_CR20) 2012; 264
2972_CR6
C Krautmacher (2972_CR21) 2005; 237
L Umutlu (2972_CR5) 2010; 17
CA Azlan (2972_CR24) 2010; 31
SB Reeder (2972_CR18) 2004; 51
AD Elster (2972_CR22) 1997; 7
MA Korteweg (2972_CR4) 2011; 46
CK Kuhl (2972_CR23) 2007; 244
GH Glover (2972_CR19) 1991; 18
AN Nnewihe (2972_CR27) 2011; 66
2972_CR12
M Tozaki (2972_CR14) 2009; 193
I Hancu (2972_CR26) 2012; 36
2972_CR10
M Lazebnik (2972_CR13) 2007; 52
2972_CR16
BL Bank van de (2972_CR8) 2013; 26
BL Stehouwer (2972_CR11) 2013; 31
References_xml – reference: BaltzerPADietzelMBurmeisterHPApplication of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective studyAm J Roentgenol2011196W641W64710.2214/AJR.10.4889
– reference: KrautmacherCWillinekWATschampaHJBrain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T—initial experienceRadiology2005237101410191623714210.1148/radiol.2373041672
– reference: NnewiheANGrafendorferTDanielBLCustom-fitted 16-channel bilateral breast coil for bidirectional parallel imagingMagn Reson Med2011662812892128759310.1002/mrm.22771
– reference: KuhlCKBreast MR imaging at 3TMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2007153153201789305210.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003
– reference: LazebnikMPopovicDMcCartneyLA large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeriesPhys Med Biol200752609361151792157410.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002
– reference: Sung K, Daniel BL, Hargreaves BA. Transmit B1+ field inhomogeneity and T1 estimation errors in breast DCE-MRI at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging
– reference: ElsterADHow much contrast is enough? dependence of enhancement on field strength and MR pulse sequenceEur Radiol19977276280937055910.1007/PL00006908
– reference: Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Luijten PR et al (2012) Feasibility of contrast-enhanced and high-resolution 7 Tesla MRI in patients with suspicious breast lesions ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1474
– reference: KuhlCKKooijmanHGiesekeJSchildHHEffect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 TRadiology20072449299301770984310.1148/radiol.2443070266
– reference: Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Korteweg MA et al. 7 T versus 3 T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experience. Magn Reson Imaging
– reference: TozakiMFukumaE1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy?AJR Am J Roentgenol20091938408491969630010.2214/AJR.08.2128
– reference: Zaric O, Pinker K, Gruber S et al (2013) Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast at 7T – ready for clinical application? ISMRM, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp 196
– reference: Lee RF, Moy L, Brown R et al (2006) 7T high resolution breast MRI ISMRM, Seattle, WA, pp 2900
– reference: HancuILeeSKDixonWTField shaping arrays: a means to address shading in high field breast MRIJ Magn Reson Imaging2012368658722273024210.1002/jmri.23719
– reference: Brown R, Storey P, McGorty K et al (2012) Toward improved T1-weighted breast imaging at 7T: preliminary results and comparison with 3T ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 2981
– reference: Fautz HP, Vogel M, Gross P, Kerr A, Zhu Y (2008) B1 mapping of coil arrays for parallel transmission ISMRM, Toronto, Ontario, pp 1247
– reference: ReederSBWenZYuHMulticoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation methodMagn Reson Med20045135451470504310.1002/mrm.106751:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVSisro%3D
– reference: MahoneyMCGatsonisCHannaLDeMartiniWBLehmanCPositive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imagingRadiology201226451582258932010.1148/radiol.12110619
– reference: GloverGHSchneiderEThree-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correctionMagn Reson Med199118371383204651810.1002/mrm.19101802111:STN:280:DyaK3M3mtVCjsQ%3D%3D
– reference: ConstantinidesCDAtalarEMcVeighERSignal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arraysMagn Reson Med199738852857935846210.1002/mrm.19103805241:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fitlaquw%3D%3D
– reference: Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Luijten PR, Mali WPTM, van den Bosch MAAJ, Veldhuis WB (2012) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 7T and 3T; initial results of an intra-individual comparison of BI-RADS-MRI lesion assessment ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1485
– reference: KortewegMAVeldhuisWBVisserFFeasibility of 7 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging determination of intrinsic sensitivity and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapyInvestig Radiol20114637037610.1097/RLI.0b013e31820df7061:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXlslSrsbw%3D
– reference: StehouwerBLKlompDWKortewegMA7 T versus 3T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experienceMagn Reson Imaging2013316136172311684810.1016/j.mri.2012.09.005
– reference: Brown R, McGorty K, Moy L, DeGregorio S, Sodickson DK, Wiggins GC (2011) Sub-millimeter breast imaging and relaxivity characterization at 7T ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, pp 3092
– reference: UmutluLMaderwaldSKraffODynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI at 7 Tesla utilizing a single-loop coil: a feasibility trialAcad Radiol201017105010562059915810.1016/j.acra.2010.03.017
– reference: van de BankBLVoogtIJItaliaanderMUltra high spatial and temporal resolution breast imaging at 7TNMR Biomed20132636737510.1002/nbm.2868
– reference: AzlanCADi GiovanniPAhearnTSSempleSIGilbertFJRedpathTWB1 transmission-field inhomogeneity and enhancement ratio errors in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast at 3TJ Magn Reson Imaging2010312342392002759410.1002/jmri.22018
– volume: 52
  start-page: 6093
  year: 2007
  ident: 2972_CR13
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002
– volume: 264
  start-page: 51
  year: 2012
  ident: 2972_CR20
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110619
– volume: 7
  start-page: 276
  year: 1997
  ident: 2972_CR22
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/PL00006908
– ident: 2972_CR10
– ident: 2972_CR9
  doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(12)70169-7
– volume: 36
  start-page: 865
  year: 2012
  ident: 2972_CR26
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.23719
– volume: 15
  start-page: 315
  year: 2007
  ident: 2972_CR3
  publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003
– volume: 66
  start-page: 281
  year: 2011
  ident: 2972_CR27
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.22771
– volume: 193
  start-page: 840
  year: 2009
  ident: 2972_CR14
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2128
– volume: 51
  start-page: 35
  year: 2004
  ident: 2972_CR18
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.10675
– ident: 2972_CR1
– volume: 46
  start-page: 370
  year: 2011
  ident: 2972_CR4
  publication-title: Investig Radiol
  doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31820df706
– volume: 38
  start-page: 852
  year: 1997
  ident: 2972_CR17
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910380524
– ident: 2972_CR16
– volume: 26
  start-page: 367
  year: 2013
  ident: 2972_CR8
  publication-title: NMR Biomed
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.2868
– ident: 2972_CR12
– ident: 2972_CR7
– volume: 31
  start-page: 613
  year: 2013
  ident: 2972_CR11
  publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.005
– volume: 18
  start-page: 371
  year: 1991
  ident: 2972_CR19
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910180211
– volume: 31
  start-page: 234
  year: 2010
  ident: 2972_CR24
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.22018
– volume: 196
  start-page: W641
  year: 2011
  ident: 2972_CR15
  publication-title: Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4889
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1050
  year: 2010
  ident: 2972_CR5
  publication-title: Acad Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.017
– volume: 237
  start-page: 1014
  year: 2005
  ident: 2972_CR21
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373041672
– volume: 244
  start-page: 929
  year: 2007
  ident: 2972_CR23
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443070266
– ident: 2972_CR25
– ident: 2972_CR2
– ident: 2972_CR6
SSID ssj0009147
Score 2.1990688
Snippet Objectives To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Methods Seventeen subjects were...
To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T...
To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T...
To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the image quality of...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 2969
SubjectTerms Adipose Tissue - pathology
Adult
Breast
Breast - pathology
Breast cancer
Breast Diseases - diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Diagnostic Radiology
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Imaging
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Magnetic fields
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Mammography
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neuroradiology
Radiology
Reproducibility of Results
Signal to noise ratio
Ultrasound
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  dbid: U2A
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NbtQwELZQkVAviPJTAltkpJ5AlmLHm6x7KxXVgrQcql1pb5Ht2GqkJbvdTcSD8AI8C0_GjPNTllIkzhmPk8zY_sbzR8ipGRcG9YjpVEh0M3KmTKqZMUJx71LDQxb_7Es6XcjPy_Gyy-Pe9dHuvUsy7NRDshu2HcMgKuw9lgkGJs_DMZjuGMe3EOe3lXZ56CoGlvqEZUrJ3pX5Nxb7h9EdhHk3UPIPb2k4hC6fkMcdeqTnrbiPyANXPSWPZp1__Bn5_gFjzGs6u_pEdU2znz_mDmRO8baVamrKlcaM4xW163JFdVXQOWffwu2oK6i2N03ZxnC1I7Zr0wA3D6x2zaYLma3OaPkVdiF6Wyg8cLJDR8N2cNJN_pwsLj_OL6asa7vArMzimoEBAkZOlimvvXAJdwZghY-tx06aAZJpXahYFElmAe6g320iuHYx91oWE5G8IAfVunIvCVWpsMKmXjkQhLLSFElqYucLDYyNtBGJ-_-f264mObbGWOVDNeUgshxElqPIch6Rd8OQTVuQ41_Eo16oebc2dzm6s2EjS7iMyNvhMawqdJXoyq2bQJMkCuBYHJHjVgeG2QDkqBS25Yhke9oxEGDF7v0nVXkdKndLwAtcAM_3vR799lr3fcSr_6J-TQ4FKnhIlxyRg3rbuBPATbV5E9bJL8HEEMc
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-013-2972-1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23896763
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1440183314
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1443390660
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4036120
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1fb9MwELdYKyFeEP_JGJWReAJZxE4ax7ygDrUboE5oaqXyFNmOIyKVpFsb7XPwjTk7TkqZ2EseYvsc587nn33nO4TeqnGurBwRmbDYmhkpESqRRCkmaGESRd0t_vlFcr6Mv67GK3_gtvVulZ1OdIo6r7U9I_9gjZAgfhGNP22uiM0aZa2rPoXGERqCCk7HAzQ8nV58v9yH3aUuxRhs21PChYg7u2bowojCXp7Y7AZMcEbo4cp0C27e9pr8x3TqVqTZI_TQQ0k8aXn_GN0z1RN0f-6N5U_R71PrcL7D88svWO4wxwsD_Mf25BVLrMq1tLeP11jX5RrLKscLSm7cSanJsdRXTdn6c7UtrmvVALECKG2bjXefrT7i8hdoJLwPGu4o6T67Yds4avt-hpaz6eLzOfEZGIiOebgjsBeB_Q7nopAFMxE1ChBGEerCJtV06EzKXIQsj7gG5GNNcCmj0oS0kHGesug5GlR1ZV4iLBKmmU4KYYANQscqjxIVmiKXQFjFOkBh9_cz7cOT2ywZ66wPrOwYlgHDMsuwjAboXd9k08bmuKvyScfSzE_TbbYXqgC96YthglmriaxM3bg6USQAmYUBetFKQN8b4B2RgIYOED-Qjb6CDd59WFKVP10Q7xigA2VA830nRX991v8GcXz3IF6hB8zKs7sqeYIGu-vGvAbMtFMjdMRXHJ7p7GyEhpOzH9-mIz9Z4O2STf4AUEAXag
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtQwEB1VrQS8IO6kLWAkeAFFxE6a1EgIUWi1S7srVG2lvqW244hIS7LtZlXxGfwI38iMc1mWir71OfbkMsczJ57xDMArvZNpwpGvYhFRmJH7UsfK11pInttYc3eKfzSOByfR19Od0zX43Z2FobTKziY6Q51VhvbI31EQEuEX8ujj7NynrlEUXe1aaDSwOLQ_L_GXbf5h-AX1-1qIg_3J54HfdhXwTZQEtY_8Gjl8kshc5cKG3Gr0mnlgcmoU6RiHUpkMRBYmBr05hZV2BVc24LmKsl0qdIAmfwNphsRVtLG3P_52vCzzy11Ls0CiGUmkjLo4auDKloYhJYFR77RE-HzVE16ht1ezNP8J1ToPeHAP7rbUlX1qsHYf1mz5AG6N2uD8Q_i1RwnuNRsdD5mqWcImFvHGaKeXKaaLqaLTzlNmqmLKVJmxCfcv3c6szZgy54uiyR9rZlxUeoHCcpQ0X8zadN3yPSt-oAVkyyLlTpLpuyk2k8Pm3o_g5EZ08xjWy6q0T4HJWBhh4lxaVIM0kc7CWAc2zxQK1pHxIOi-fmracujUlWOa9oWcncJSVFhKCku5B2_6KbOmFsh1g7c7laatWZinSxB78LK_jAuaojSqtNXCjQlDiUww8OBJg4D-bsivZIwewYNkBRv9ACoWvnqlLL67ouERUhUuUObbDkV_Pdb_XmLz-pd4AbcHk9FRejQcH27BHUHYdsc0t2G9vljYZ8jXav28XSQMzm56Xf4BvPpN9Q
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtQwELWqrVTxgrgTKGAkeAFFjZ00WSMhRGlXXcquqmor9S3Yjq1GWpJtN1HFZ_A7fB0zzmVZKvrW59iTyxzPnHjGM4S8UbuZQhz5MuYRhhmZL1QsfaW4YNbEirlT_JNpfHgafT3bPdsgv7uzMJhW2dlEZ6izUuMe-Q4GIQF-IYt2bJsWcbw_-rS48LGDFEZau3YaDUSOzM8r-H1bfhzvg67fcj46mH059NsOA76OkqDygWsDn08SYaXlJmRGgQe1gbbYNNKxDykzEfAsTDR4dgwxDTmTJmBWRtkQix6A-d9MwCsOB2Rz72B6fLIq-ctce7NAgElJhIi6mGrgSpiGISaEYR-1hPts3Steo7rXMzb_Cds6bzi6R-62NJZ-bnB3n2yY4gHZmrSB-ofk1x4mu1d0cjKmsqIJnRnAHsVdXyqpyucSTz7PqS7zOZVFRmfMv3K7tCajUl_UeZNL1sy4LFUNwixIWtaLNnW3-EDzH2AN6apguZOk-86KzeSwufcjcnorunlMBkVZmKeEiphrrmMrDKhB6EhlYawCYzMJglWkPRJ0Xz_VbWl07NAxT_uizk5hKSgsRYWlzCPv-imLpi7ITYO3O5WmrYlYpitAe-R1fxkWN0ZsZGHK2o0JQwGsMPDIkwYB_d2Aa4kYvINHkjVs9AOwcPj6lSI_dwXEI6AtjIPM9x2K_nqs_73Es5tf4hXZgvWYfhtPj56TOxyh7U5sbpNBdVmbF0DdKvWyXSOUfL_tZfkHYtNSIQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast+MRI+at+7+Tesla+with+a+bilateral+coil+and+T1-weighted+acquisition+with+robust+fat+suppression%3A+image+evaluation+and+comparison+with+3+Tesla&rft.jtitle=European+radiology&rft.au=Brown%2C+Ryan&rft.au=Storey%2C+Pippa&rft.au=Geppert%2C+Christian&rft.au=McGorty%2C+KellyAnne&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00330-013-2972-1&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23896763&rft.externalDocID=23896763
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon