Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla
Objectives To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Methods Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images wer...
Saved in:
Published in | European radiology Vol. 23; no. 11; pp. 2969 - 2978 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.11.2013
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0938-7994 1432-1084 1432-1084 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-013-2972-1 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives
To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.
Methods
Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements.
Results
Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm
3
), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1,
P
≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (
P
< 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation.
Conclusion
The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T.
Key Points
•
High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T.
•
7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures.
•
Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T.
•
7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity.
•
The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.
Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements.
Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm(3)), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation.
The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T.
• High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity. To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements.METHODSSeventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements.Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm(3)), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation.RESULTSImage scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm(3)), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation.The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T.CONCLUSIONThe 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T.• High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity.KEY POINTS• High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity. To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements. Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1×1.1×1.1-1.6 mm^sup 3^), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P≤0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T (P<0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation. The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T. * High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. * 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. * Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. * 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. * The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Objectives To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Methods Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and 3D gradient echo sequence with adiabatic inversion-based fat suppression (FS). Images were graded on a five-point scale and quantitatively assessed through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fibroglandular/fat contrast and signal uniformity measurements. Results Image scores at 7 and 3 T were similar on standard-resolution images (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1-1.6 mm 3 ), indicating that high-quality breast imaging with clinical parameters can be performed at 7 T. The 7-T SNR advantage was underscored on 0.6-mm isotropic images, where image quality was significantly greater than at 3 T (4.2 versus 3.1, P ≤ 0.0001). Fibroglandular/fat contrast was more than two times higher at 7 T than at 3 T, owing to effective adiabatic inversion-based FS and the inherent 7-T signal advantage. Signal uniformity was comparable at 7 and 3 T ( P < 0.05). Similar 7-T image quality was observed in all subjects, indicating robustness against anatomical variation. Conclusion The 7-T bilateral transmit-receive coil and adiabatic inversion-based FS technique produce image quality that is as good as or better than at 3 T. Key Points • High image quality bilateral breast MRI is achievable with clinical parameters at 7 T. • 7-T high-resolution imaging improves delineation of subtle soft tissue structures. • Adiabatic-based fat suppression provides excellent fibroglandular/fat contrast at 7 T. • 7- and 3-T 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images have similar signal uniformity. • The 7-T dual solenoid coil enables bilateral imaging without compromising uniformity. |
Author | Brown, Ryan Leite, Ana Paula Klautau Storey, Pippa Wiggins, Graham C. Sodickson, Daniel K. Geppert, Christian Babb, James Moy, Linda McGorty, KellyAnne |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States 2 Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., New York, NY, United States |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States – name: 2 Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., New York, NY, United States |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ryan surname: Brown fullname: Brown, Ryan email: ryan.brown@nyumc.org organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center – sequence: 2 givenname: Pippa surname: Storey fullname: Storey, Pippa organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center – sequence: 3 givenname: Christian surname: Geppert fullname: Geppert, Christian organization: Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc – sequence: 4 givenname: KellyAnne surname: McGorty fullname: McGorty, KellyAnne organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center – sequence: 5 givenname: Ana Paula Klautau surname: Leite fullname: Leite, Ana Paula Klautau organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center – sequence: 6 givenname: James surname: Babb fullname: Babb, James organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center – sequence: 7 givenname: Daniel K. surname: Sodickson fullname: Sodickson, Daniel K. organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center – sequence: 8 givenname: Graham C. surname: Wiggins fullname: Wiggins, Graham C. organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center – sequence: 9 givenname: Linda surname: Moy fullname: Moy, Linda organization: Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23896763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9Uttu1DAQtVAR3S58AC_IEi-8BMZ2Eic8IEHFpVIRElqeLa8z2XWVjVPbacV39Af6LXwZTrOLSiV48khzzvGZmXNCjnrXIyHPGbxmAPJNABACMmAi47XkGXtEFiwXqYAqPyILqEWVybrOj8lJCBcAULNcPiHHXFR1KUuxIDcfPOoQ6dfvZ1RHKn_drjB0ml7buKWarm2nI3rdUeNsR3Xf0BXLrtFuthEbqs3laION1vUzw7v1mNTaJBXGYfAYQuq9pXanN0jxSnejvkNPSsbtBu1tOJDF_vOn5HGru4DP9u-S_Pj0cXX6JTv_9vns9P15ZnIJMZNlxUuQsm51y1EwXIMsWjBtUZRpPXXBtG5q4I2QJs1bVLyqONMIrNV5U3GxJO9m3WFc77Ax2Mc0qRp8cut_Kqet-rvT263auCuVgygZhyTwai_g3eWIIaqdDQa7TvfoxqBYngtRQ1lO0JcPoBdu9H0ab0IBq4RIl1uSF_cd_bFyuFcCyBlgvAvBY6uMjXcbTQZtpxioKRlqToZKyVBTMhRLTPaAeRD_H4fPnJCw_Qb9PdP_JP0GbqnMjw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_013_3075_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_nbm_3272 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mri_2015_12_012 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_24573 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20160715 crossref_primary_10_1002_nbm_4039 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12194_014_0278_x crossref_primary_10_1097_RLI_0000000000000183 crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2015_2403850 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_014_2889_7 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_15141905 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_25424 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_25304 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_84616_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_26651 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00256_014_1818_5 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40064_015_1654_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00117_013_2580_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_27829 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0113969 |
Cites_doi | 10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002 10.1148/radiol.12110619 10.1007/PL00006908 10.1016/S0959-8049(12)70169-7 10.1002/jmri.23719 10.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003 10.1002/mrm.22771 10.2214/AJR.08.2128 10.1002/mrm.10675 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31820df706 10.1002/mrm.1910380524 10.1002/nbm.2868 10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.005 10.1002/mrm.1910180211 10.1002/jmri.22018 10.2214/AJR.10.4889 10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.017 10.1148/radiol.2373041672 10.1148/radiol.2443070266 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | European Society of Radiology 2013 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: European Society of Radiology 2013 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QO 7RV 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. KB0 LK8 M0S M1P M7P NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-013-2972-1 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Biological Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Central Student |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1432-1084 |
EndPage | 2978 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4036120 3093267331 23896763 10_1007_s00330_013_2972_1 |
Genre | Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GeographicLocations | New York United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: New York – name: United States--US |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS grantid: R01 EB002568 |
GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 04C 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29G 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAWTL AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABUWZ ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFO ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACIHN ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACPRK ACREN ACUDM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADOJX ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEAQA AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGVAE AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARAPS ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBNVY BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BHPHI BKEYQ BMSDO BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBD EBLON EBS ECF ECT EIHBH EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG EX3 F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GXS H13 HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I-F I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH LAS LK8 LLZTM M1P M4Y M7P MA- N2Q N9A NAPCQ NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P62 P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI RNS ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UDS UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 WOW YLTOR Z45 Z7R Z7U Z7X Z7Y Z7Z Z82 Z83 Z85 Z87 Z88 Z8M Z8O Z8R Z8S Z8T Z8V Z8W Z8Z Z91 Z92 ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC ADHKG ADKFA AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7XB 8FD 8FK ABRTQ AZQEC DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ K9. P64 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS 7X8 PUEGO 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-768260779faf2e31eb075f0cf556100951aad902d37c3895828821ae01fa4d823 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:34:55 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 05:44:17 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:09:37 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:31:21 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:07:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:36 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:32:59 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Keywords | High-field MRI Breast cancer Fat suppression RF coil array Bilateral breast imaging |
Language | English |
License | http://www.springer.com/tdm |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c470t-768260779faf2e31eb075f0cf556100951aad902d37c3895828821ae01fa4d823 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4036120 |
PMID | 23896763 |
PQID | 1440183314 |
PQPubID | 54162 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4036120 proquest_miscellaneous_1443390660 proquest_journals_1440183314 pubmed_primary_23896763 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00330_013_2972_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_013_2972_1 springer_journals_10_1007_s00330_013_2972_1 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2013 text: 2013-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Berlin/Heidelberg |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Germany – name: Heidelberg |
PublicationTitle | European radiology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Eur Radiol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Eur Radiol |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | KuhlCKBreast MR imaging at 3TMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2007153153201789305210.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003 AzlanCADi GiovanniPAhearnTSSempleSIGilbertFJRedpathTWB1 transmission-field inhomogeneity and enhancement ratio errors in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast at 3TJ Magn Reson Imaging2010312342392002759410.1002/jmri.22018 Fautz HP, Vogel M, Gross P, Kerr A, Zhu Y (2008) B1 mapping of coil arrays for parallel transmission ISMRM, Toronto, Ontario, pp 1247 GloverGHSchneiderEThree-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correctionMagn Reson Med199118371383204651810.1002/mrm.19101802111:STN:280:DyaK3M3mtVCjsQ%3D%3D HancuILeeSKDixonWTField shaping arrays: a means to address shading in high field breast MRIJ Magn Reson Imaging2012368658722273024210.1002/jmri.23719 Brown R, Storey P, McGorty K et al (2012) Toward improved T1-weighted breast imaging at 7T: preliminary results and comparison with 3T ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 2981 TozakiMFukumaE1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy?AJR Am J Roentgenol20091938408491969630010.2214/AJR.08.2128 KortewegMAVeldhuisWBVisserFFeasibility of 7 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging determination of intrinsic sensitivity and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapyInvestig Radiol20114637037610.1097/RLI.0b013e31820df7061:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXlslSrsbw%3D Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Luijten PR et al (2012) Feasibility of contrast-enhanced and high-resolution 7 Tesla MRI in patients with suspicious breast lesions ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1474 KrautmacherCWillinekWATschampaHJBrain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T—initial experienceRadiology2005237101410191623714210.1148/radiol.2373041672 Sung K, Daniel BL, Hargreaves BA. Transmit B1+ field inhomogeneity and T1 estimation errors in breast DCE-MRI at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging ElsterADHow much contrast is enough? dependence of enhancement on field strength and MR pulse sequenceEur Radiol19977276280937055910.1007/PL00006908 BaltzerPADietzelMBurmeisterHPApplication of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective studyAm J Roentgenol2011196W641W64710.2214/AJR.10.4889 UmutluLMaderwaldSKraffODynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI at 7 Tesla utilizing a single-loop coil: a feasibility trialAcad Radiol201017105010562059915810.1016/j.acra.2010.03.017 Lee RF, Moy L, Brown R et al (2006) 7T high resolution breast MRI ISMRM, Seattle, WA, pp 2900 ConstantinidesCDAtalarEMcVeighERSignal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arraysMagn Reson Med199738852857935846210.1002/mrm.19103805241:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fitlaquw%3D%3D KuhlCKKooijmanHGiesekeJSchildHHEffect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 TRadiology20072449299301770984310.1148/radiol.2443070266 NnewiheANGrafendorferTDanielBLCustom-fitted 16-channel bilateral breast coil for bidirectional parallel imagingMagn Reson Med2011662812892128759310.1002/mrm.22771 StehouwerBLKlompDWKortewegMA7 T versus 3T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experienceMagn Reson Imaging2013316136172311684810.1016/j.mri.2012.09.005 Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Luijten PR, Mali WPTM, van den Bosch MAAJ, Veldhuis WB (2012) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 7T and 3T; initial results of an intra-individual comparison of BI-RADS-MRI lesion assessment ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1485 Zaric O, Pinker K, Gruber S et al (2013) Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast at 7T – ready for clinical application? ISMRM, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp 196 Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Korteweg MA et al. 7 T versus 3 T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experience. Magn Reson Imaging LazebnikMPopovicDMcCartneyLA large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeriesPhys Med Biol200752609361151792157410.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002 ReederSBWenZYuHMulticoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation methodMagn Reson Med20045135451470504310.1002/mrm.106751:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVSisro%3D van de BankBLVoogtIJItaliaanderMUltra high spatial and temporal resolution breast imaging at 7TNMR Biomed20132636737510.1002/nbm.2868 Brown R, McGorty K, Moy L, DeGregorio S, Sodickson DK, Wiggins GC (2011) Sub-millimeter breast imaging and relaxivity characterization at 7T ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, pp 3092 MahoneyMCGatsonisCHannaLDeMartiniWBLehmanCPositive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imagingRadiology201226451582258932010.1148/radiol.12110619 2972_CR1 2972_CR2 PA Baltzer (2972_CR15) 2011; 196 2972_CR9 2972_CR25 CD Constantinides (2972_CR17) 1997; 38 CK Kuhl (2972_CR3) 2007; 15 2972_CR7 MC Mahoney (2972_CR20) 2012; 264 2972_CR6 C Krautmacher (2972_CR21) 2005; 237 L Umutlu (2972_CR5) 2010; 17 CA Azlan (2972_CR24) 2010; 31 SB Reeder (2972_CR18) 2004; 51 AD Elster (2972_CR22) 1997; 7 MA Korteweg (2972_CR4) 2011; 46 CK Kuhl (2972_CR23) 2007; 244 GH Glover (2972_CR19) 1991; 18 AN Nnewihe (2972_CR27) 2011; 66 2972_CR12 M Tozaki (2972_CR14) 2009; 193 I Hancu (2972_CR26) 2012; 36 2972_CR10 M Lazebnik (2972_CR13) 2007; 52 2972_CR16 BL Bank van de (2972_CR8) 2013; 26 BL Stehouwer (2972_CR11) 2013; 31 |
References_xml | – reference: BaltzerPADietzelMBurmeisterHPApplication of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective studyAm J Roentgenol2011196W641W64710.2214/AJR.10.4889 – reference: KrautmacherCWillinekWATschampaHJBrain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T—initial experienceRadiology2005237101410191623714210.1148/radiol.2373041672 – reference: NnewiheANGrafendorferTDanielBLCustom-fitted 16-channel bilateral breast coil for bidirectional parallel imagingMagn Reson Med2011662812892128759310.1002/mrm.22771 – reference: KuhlCKBreast MR imaging at 3TMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2007153153201789305210.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003 – reference: LazebnikMPopovicDMcCartneyLA large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeriesPhys Med Biol200752609361151792157410.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002 – reference: Sung K, Daniel BL, Hargreaves BA. Transmit B1+ field inhomogeneity and T1 estimation errors in breast DCE-MRI at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging – reference: ElsterADHow much contrast is enough? dependence of enhancement on field strength and MR pulse sequenceEur Radiol19977276280937055910.1007/PL00006908 – reference: Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Luijten PR et al (2012) Feasibility of contrast-enhanced and high-resolution 7 Tesla MRI in patients with suspicious breast lesions ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1474 – reference: KuhlCKKooijmanHGiesekeJSchildHHEffect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 TRadiology20072449299301770984310.1148/radiol.2443070266 – reference: Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Korteweg MA et al. 7 T versus 3 T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experience. Magn Reson Imaging – reference: TozakiMFukumaE1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy?AJR Am J Roentgenol20091938408491969630010.2214/AJR.08.2128 – reference: Zaric O, Pinker K, Gruber S et al (2013) Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast at 7T – ready for clinical application? ISMRM, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp 196 – reference: Lee RF, Moy L, Brown R et al (2006) 7T high resolution breast MRI ISMRM, Seattle, WA, pp 2900 – reference: HancuILeeSKDixonWTField shaping arrays: a means to address shading in high field breast MRIJ Magn Reson Imaging2012368658722273024210.1002/jmri.23719 – reference: Brown R, Storey P, McGorty K et al (2012) Toward improved T1-weighted breast imaging at 7T: preliminary results and comparison with 3T ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 2981 – reference: Fautz HP, Vogel M, Gross P, Kerr A, Zhu Y (2008) B1 mapping of coil arrays for parallel transmission ISMRM, Toronto, Ontario, pp 1247 – reference: ReederSBWenZYuHMulticoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation methodMagn Reson Med20045135451470504310.1002/mrm.106751:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVSisro%3D – reference: MahoneyMCGatsonisCHannaLDeMartiniWBLehmanCPositive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imagingRadiology201226451582258932010.1148/radiol.12110619 – reference: GloverGHSchneiderEThree-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correctionMagn Reson Med199118371383204651810.1002/mrm.19101802111:STN:280:DyaK3M3mtVCjsQ%3D%3D – reference: ConstantinidesCDAtalarEMcVeighERSignal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arraysMagn Reson Med199738852857935846210.1002/mrm.19103805241:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fitlaquw%3D%3D – reference: Stehouwer BL, Klomp DWJ, Luijten PR, Mali WPTM, van den Bosch MAAJ, Veldhuis WB (2012) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 7T and 3T; initial results of an intra-individual comparison of BI-RADS-MRI lesion assessment ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, pp 1485 – reference: KortewegMAVeldhuisWBVisserFFeasibility of 7 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging determination of intrinsic sensitivity and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapyInvestig Radiol20114637037610.1097/RLI.0b013e31820df7061:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXlslSrsbw%3D – reference: StehouwerBLKlompDWKortewegMA7 T versus 3T contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging of invasive ductulolobular carcinoma: first clinical experienceMagn Reson Imaging2013316136172311684810.1016/j.mri.2012.09.005 – reference: Brown R, McGorty K, Moy L, DeGregorio S, Sodickson DK, Wiggins GC (2011) Sub-millimeter breast imaging and relaxivity characterization at 7T ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, pp 3092 – reference: UmutluLMaderwaldSKraffODynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI at 7 Tesla utilizing a single-loop coil: a feasibility trialAcad Radiol201017105010562059915810.1016/j.acra.2010.03.017 – reference: van de BankBLVoogtIJItaliaanderMUltra high spatial and temporal resolution breast imaging at 7TNMR Biomed20132636737510.1002/nbm.2868 – reference: AzlanCADi GiovanniPAhearnTSSempleSIGilbertFJRedpathTWB1 transmission-field inhomogeneity and enhancement ratio errors in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast at 3TJ Magn Reson Imaging2010312342392002759410.1002/jmri.22018 – volume: 52 start-page: 6093 year: 2007 ident: 2972_CR13 publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002 – volume: 264 start-page: 51 year: 2012 ident: 2972_CR20 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110619 – volume: 7 start-page: 276 year: 1997 ident: 2972_CR22 publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/PL00006908 – ident: 2972_CR10 – ident: 2972_CR9 doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(12)70169-7 – volume: 36 start-page: 865 year: 2012 ident: 2972_CR26 publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.23719 – volume: 15 start-page: 315 year: 2007 ident: 2972_CR3 publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003 – volume: 66 start-page: 281 year: 2011 ident: 2972_CR27 publication-title: Magn Reson Med doi: 10.1002/mrm.22771 – volume: 193 start-page: 840 year: 2009 ident: 2972_CR14 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2128 – volume: 51 start-page: 35 year: 2004 ident: 2972_CR18 publication-title: Magn Reson Med doi: 10.1002/mrm.10675 – ident: 2972_CR1 – volume: 46 start-page: 370 year: 2011 ident: 2972_CR4 publication-title: Investig Radiol doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31820df706 – volume: 38 start-page: 852 year: 1997 ident: 2972_CR17 publication-title: Magn Reson Med doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910380524 – ident: 2972_CR16 – volume: 26 start-page: 367 year: 2013 ident: 2972_CR8 publication-title: NMR Biomed doi: 10.1002/nbm.2868 – ident: 2972_CR12 – ident: 2972_CR7 – volume: 31 start-page: 613 year: 2013 ident: 2972_CR11 publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.005 – volume: 18 start-page: 371 year: 1991 ident: 2972_CR19 publication-title: Magn Reson Med doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910180211 – volume: 31 start-page: 234 year: 2010 ident: 2972_CR24 publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.22018 – volume: 196 start-page: W641 year: 2011 ident: 2972_CR15 publication-title: Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4889 – volume: 17 start-page: 1050 year: 2010 ident: 2972_CR5 publication-title: Acad Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.017 – volume: 237 start-page: 1014 year: 2005 ident: 2972_CR21 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373041672 – volume: 244 start-page: 929 year: 2007 ident: 2972_CR23 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443070266 – ident: 2972_CR25 – ident: 2972_CR2 – ident: 2972_CR6 |
SSID | ssj0009147 |
Score | 2.1990688 |
Snippet | Objectives
To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.
Methods
Seventeen subjects were... To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T... To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images. Seventeen subjects were imaged using a 7-T... To evaluate the image quality of T1-weighted fat-suppressed breast MRI at 7 T and to compare 7-T and 3-T images.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the image quality of... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 2969 |
SubjectTerms | Adipose Tissue - pathology Adult Breast Breast - pathology Breast cancer Breast Diseases - diagnosis Diagnosis, Differential Diagnostic Radiology Equipment Design Female Humans Imaging Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Magnetic fields Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation Mammography Medical screening Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neuroradiology Radiology Reproducibility of Results Signal to noise ratio Ultrasound Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) dbid: U2A link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NbtQwELZQkVAviPJTAltkpJ5AlmLHm6x7KxXVgrQcql1pb5Ht2GqkJbvdTcSD8AI8C0_GjPNTllIkzhmPk8zY_sbzR8ipGRcG9YjpVEh0M3KmTKqZMUJx71LDQxb_7Es6XcjPy_Gyy-Pe9dHuvUsy7NRDshu2HcMgKuw9lgkGJs_DMZjuGMe3EOe3lXZ56CoGlvqEZUrJ3pX5Nxb7h9EdhHk3UPIPb2k4hC6fkMcdeqTnrbiPyANXPSWPZp1__Bn5_gFjzGs6u_pEdU2znz_mDmRO8baVamrKlcaM4xW163JFdVXQOWffwu2oK6i2N03ZxnC1I7Zr0wA3D6x2zaYLma3OaPkVdiF6Wyg8cLJDR8N2cNJN_pwsLj_OL6asa7vArMzimoEBAkZOlimvvXAJdwZghY-tx06aAZJpXahYFElmAe6g320iuHYx91oWE5G8IAfVunIvCVWpsMKmXjkQhLLSFElqYucLDYyNtBGJ-_-f264mObbGWOVDNeUgshxElqPIch6Rd8OQTVuQ41_Eo16oebc2dzm6s2EjS7iMyNvhMawqdJXoyq2bQJMkCuBYHJHjVgeG2QDkqBS25Yhke9oxEGDF7v0nVXkdKndLwAtcAM_3vR799lr3fcSr_6J-TQ4FKnhIlxyRg3rbuBPATbV5E9bJL8HEEMc priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-013-2972-1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23896763 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1440183314 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1443390660 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4036120 |
Volume | 23 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1fb9MwELdYKyFeEP_JGJWReAJZxE4ax7ygDrUboE5oaqXyFNmOIyKVpFsb7XPwjTk7TkqZ2EseYvsc587nn33nO4TeqnGurBwRmbDYmhkpESqRRCkmaGESRd0t_vlFcr6Mv67GK3_gtvVulZ1OdIo6r7U9I_9gjZAgfhGNP22uiM0aZa2rPoXGERqCCk7HAzQ8nV58v9yH3aUuxRhs21PChYg7u2bowojCXp7Y7AZMcEbo4cp0C27e9pr8x3TqVqTZI_TQQ0k8aXn_GN0z1RN0f-6N5U_R71PrcL7D88svWO4wxwsD_Mf25BVLrMq1tLeP11jX5RrLKscLSm7cSanJsdRXTdn6c7UtrmvVALECKG2bjXefrT7i8hdoJLwPGu4o6T67Yds4avt-hpaz6eLzOfEZGIiOebgjsBeB_Q7nopAFMxE1ChBGEerCJtV06EzKXIQsj7gG5GNNcCmj0oS0kHGesug5GlR1ZV4iLBKmmU4KYYANQscqjxIVmiKXQFjFOkBh9_cz7cOT2ywZ66wPrOwYlgHDMsuwjAboXd9k08bmuKvyScfSzE_TbbYXqgC96YthglmriaxM3bg6USQAmYUBetFKQN8b4B2RgIYOED-Qjb6CDd59WFKVP10Q7xigA2VA830nRX991v8GcXz3IF6hB8zKs7sqeYIGu-vGvAbMtFMjdMRXHJ7p7GyEhpOzH9-mIz9Z4O2STf4AUEAXag |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtQwEB1VrQS8IO6kLWAkeAFFxE6a1EgIUWi1S7srVG2lvqW244hIS7LtZlXxGfwI38iMc1mWir71OfbkMsczJ57xDMArvZNpwpGvYhFRmJH7UsfK11pInttYc3eKfzSOByfR19Od0zX43Z2FobTKziY6Q51VhvbI31EQEuEX8ujj7NynrlEUXe1aaDSwOLQ_L_GXbf5h-AX1-1qIg_3J54HfdhXwTZQEtY_8Gjl8kshc5cKG3Gr0mnlgcmoU6RiHUpkMRBYmBr05hZV2BVc24LmKsl0qdIAmfwNphsRVtLG3P_52vCzzy11Ls0CiGUmkjLo4auDKloYhJYFR77RE-HzVE16ht1ezNP8J1ToPeHAP7rbUlX1qsHYf1mz5AG6N2uD8Q_i1RwnuNRsdD5mqWcImFvHGaKeXKaaLqaLTzlNmqmLKVJmxCfcv3c6szZgy54uiyR9rZlxUeoHCcpQ0X8zadN3yPSt-oAVkyyLlTpLpuyk2k8Pm3o_g5EZ08xjWy6q0T4HJWBhh4lxaVIM0kc7CWAc2zxQK1pHxIOi-fmracujUlWOa9oWcncJSVFhKCku5B2_6KbOmFsh1g7c7laatWZinSxB78LK_jAuaojSqtNXCjQlDiUww8OBJg4D-bsivZIwewYNkBRv9ACoWvnqlLL67ouERUhUuUObbDkV_Pdb_XmLz-pd4AbcHk9FRejQcH27BHUHYdsc0t2G9vljYZ8jXav28XSQMzm56Xf4BvPpN9Q |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtQwELWqrVTxgrgTKGAkeAFFjZ00WSMhRGlXXcquqmor9S3Yjq1GWpJtN1HFZ_A7fB0zzmVZKvrW59iTyxzPnHjGM4S8UbuZQhz5MuYRhhmZL1QsfaW4YNbEirlT_JNpfHgafT3bPdsgv7uzMJhW2dlEZ6izUuMe-Q4GIQF-IYt2bJsWcbw_-rS48LGDFEZau3YaDUSOzM8r-H1bfhzvg67fcj46mH059NsOA76OkqDygWsDn08SYaXlJmRGgQe1gbbYNNKxDykzEfAsTDR4dgwxDTmTJmBWRtkQix6A-d9MwCsOB2Rz72B6fLIq-ctce7NAgElJhIi6mGrgSpiGISaEYR-1hPts3Steo7rXMzb_Cds6bzi6R-62NJZ-bnB3n2yY4gHZmrSB-ofk1x4mu1d0cjKmsqIJnRnAHsVdXyqpyucSTz7PqS7zOZVFRmfMv3K7tCajUl_UeZNL1sy4LFUNwixIWtaLNnW3-EDzH2AN6apguZOk-86KzeSwufcjcnorunlMBkVZmKeEiphrrmMrDKhB6EhlYawCYzMJglWkPRJ0Xz_VbWl07NAxT_uizk5hKSgsRYWlzCPv-imLpi7ITYO3O5WmrYlYpitAe-R1fxkWN0ZsZGHK2o0JQwGsMPDIkwYB_d2Aa4kYvINHkjVs9AOwcPj6lSI_dwXEI6AtjIPM9x2K_nqs_73Es5tf4hXZgvWYfhtPj56TOxyh7U5sbpNBdVmbF0DdKvWyXSOUfL_tZfkHYtNSIQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast+MRI+at+7+Tesla+with+a+bilateral+coil+and+T1-weighted+acquisition+with+robust+fat+suppression%3A+image+evaluation+and+comparison+with+3+Tesla&rft.jtitle=European+radiology&rft.au=Brown%2C+Ryan&rft.au=Storey%2C+Pippa&rft.au=Geppert%2C+Christian&rft.au=McGorty%2C+KellyAnne&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00330-013-2972-1&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23896763&rft.externalDocID=23896763 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon |