The Construction of Physics as a Quintessentially Masculine Subject: Young People’s Perceptions of Gender Issues in Access to Physics

The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15–16 year-old adolescents and their parents....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSex roles Vol. 76; no. 3-4; pp. 156 - 174
Main Authors Francis, Becky, Archer, Louise, Moote, Julie, DeWitt, Jen, MacLeod, Emily, Yeomans, Lucy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.02.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0360-0025
1573-2762
DOI10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15–16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents’ and their parents’ articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women’s access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and “hard” domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity.
AbstractList The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15–16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents’ and their parents’ articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women’s access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and “hard” domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity.
The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15-16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents' and their parents' articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women's access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and "hard" domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity.The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15-16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents' and their parents' articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women's access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and "hard" domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity.
The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15-16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents' and their parents' articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women's access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and "hard" domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity.
Author DeWitt, Jen
Moote, Julie
Yeomans, Lucy
Francis, Becky
Archer, Louise
MacLeod, Emily
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Becky
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3930-6798
  surname: Francis
  fullname: Francis, Becky
  email: B.Francis@ucl.ac.uk
  organization: Institute of Education, University College London
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Louise
  surname: Archer
  fullname: Archer, Louise
  organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Julie
  surname: Moote
  fullname: Moote, Julie
  organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jen
  surname: DeWitt
  fullname: DeWitt, Jen
  organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Emily
  surname: MacLeod
  fullname: MacLeod, Emily
  organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Lucy
  surname: Yeomans
  fullname: Yeomans, Lucy
  organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28133410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kt9qFDEUxoNU7Lb6AN5IwBtvRvNnMpl4IZRFa6FixXrhVUiyZ3azzCZrMiNsr7zzGXw9n8QM25ZaUAgkkN_3nfNxzhE6CDEAQk8peUkJka8ypVSpitCmIk2jqqsHaEaF5BWTDTtAM8IbUhHCxCE6ynlNCCmy-hE6ZC3lvKZkhn5ergDPY8hDGt3gY8CxwxerXfYuY1MO_jT6MEDOEAZv-n6HP5jsxt4HwJ9HuwY3vMZf4xiW-ALitoffP37l8kwOtpNfngxPISwg4bOcR8jYB3ziXLHEQ7yp9Rg97Eyf4cn1fYy-vHt7OX9fnX88PZufnFeulmSouIGOWug4qYngqu6YMMrWorxszQjIxrrWKbuQjrdWEiG4ENI6a6Szjnb8GL3Z-25Hu4GFK6mS6fU2-Y1JOx2N13__BL_Sy_hdC8ZlXZNi8OLaIMVvJc2gNz476HsTII5Z07ZhiqtWqYI-v4eu45hCiVco0XLFClaoZ3c7um3lZkYFoHvApZhzgu4WoURPe6D3e6DLHuhpD_RV0ch7GucHM82jhPL9f5Vsr8ylSlhCutP0P0V_ANIyyxg
CODEN SROLDH
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_berj_3767
crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21822
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0308558
crossref_primary_10_1111_gwao_12249
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssaho_2025_101430
crossref_primary_10_1111_gwao_12286
crossref_primary_10_1119_1_5145532
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10763_024_10483_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11422_023_10201_3
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_17_010114
crossref_primary_10_1080_01425692_2016_1253455
crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2022_2097331
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_022_01292_3
crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21593
crossref_primary_10_1103_Physics_14_33
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_020_01089_1
crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2024_2343436
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_abad4a
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_acbad9
crossref_primary_10_46606_eajess2022v03i06_0231
crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_21339
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cedpsych_2022_102125
crossref_primary_10_1108_ET_02_2023_0033
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_021_00220_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2021_2021457
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_aa8f2a
crossref_primary_10_1080_03043797_2020_1711707
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_017_0869_1
crossref_primary_10_1177_0270467620911589
crossref_primary_10_1093_cdj_bsae011
crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21721
crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21962
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_018_9770_3
crossref_primary_10_1177_09636625211002375
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_19_020134
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_ad6388
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_20_020109
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJEM_02_2023_0082
crossref_primary_10_1080_13636820_2020_1734061
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techsoc_2023_102245
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_024_00472_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_021_01233_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102079
crossref_primary_10_1080_03057267_2024_2388931
crossref_primary_10_1080_21683603_2021_1945512
crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_10991
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1018241
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_018_9786_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10649_020_09986_9
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_18_020127
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41567_024_02391_6
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_20_020142
crossref_primary_10_30935_scimath_12564
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_16_010129
crossref_primary_10_1007_s44217_024_00153_3
crossref_primary_10_1119_5_0044392
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2022_102322
crossref_primary_10_1080_02680939_2019_1709130
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_19_010107
crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2019_1707679
crossref_primary_10_1002_berj_3289
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_ac4145
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01388.x
10.1007/s11422-012-9447-6
10.1080/0305764X.2010.502886
10.1080/09500693.2010.551671
10.4135/9781848607996.n16
10.1126/science.1183944
10.1007/s11199-016-0597-y
10.1080/09589236.2012.639174
10.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb00818.x
10.1177/0038038505058369
10.3102/0002831211433290
10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5
10.1080/00131911003637014
10.1002/sce.20338
10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X
10.1080/00071005.2011.578567
10.1007/BF00776738
10.1177/0361684312459328
10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O
10.1080/09500693.2012.681076
10.1037/a0025199
10.1017/CBO9780511488856
10.1080/0142569042000294192
10.1080/02671522.2016.1219382
10.1080/03057260802681821
10.1002/sce.21146
10.1080/13639080120106730
10.1002/tea.20250/
10.1007/s10763-011-9286-z
10.1177/1948550611405218
10.1080/14794800801915814
10.1080/01411926.2010.515019
10.1080/09540253.2013.860433
10.1080/030549800103845
10.1080/09540253.2011.565040
10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20
10.1080/08935698908657865
10.4159/harvard.9780674065048
10.1080/09540250903341146
10.1080/0142569980190405
10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593
10.1080/01411926.2010.526702
10.1002/tea.20269
10.1080/01425690301891
10.1080/09500690701324190
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2016
Sex Roles is a copyright of Springer, 2017.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2016
– notice: Sex Roles is a copyright of Springer, 2017.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
0-V
3V.
7R6
7U4
7XB
888
88B
88G
88J
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
ALSLI
AZQEC
BENPR
BHHNA
CCPQU
CJNVE
DWI
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HEHIP
M0P
M2M
M2O
M2R
M2S
MBDVC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PMKZF
POGQB
PQEDU
PQEST
PQGEN
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PRQQA
PSYQQ
Q9U
QXPDG
WZK
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z
DatabaseName SpringerOpen Free (Free internet resource, activated by CARLI)
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
GenderWatch
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)
Education Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Sociological Abstracts
ProQuest One Community College
Education Collection
Sociological Abstracts
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
Sociology Collection
Education Database
Psychology Database
Research Library
Social Science Database
Sociology Database
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Digital Collections
ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Women's Studies
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Social Sciences
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
Diversity Collection
Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Social Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
Sociology & Social Sciences Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Diversity Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Sociology Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Sociology
Social Science Premium Collection
Education Collection
ProQuest One Social Sciences
GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Education Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Sociology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Digital Collections
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
ProQuest Social Science Journals
GenderWatch
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Sociological Abstracts
ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
ProQuest One Education
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Social Welfare & Social Work
Psychology
Women's Studies
Engineering
Physics
EISSN 1573-2762
EndPage 174
ExternalDocumentID PMC5237440
4301572401
28133410
10_1007_s11199_016_0669_z
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom--UK
United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom--UK
– name: United States--US
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Economic and Social Research Council
  grantid: ES/L002841/1
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269
– fundername: ;
  grantid: ES/L002841/1
GroupedDBID --Z
-4V
-55
-5G
-BR
-DZ
-EM
-W8
-Y2
-~C
-~X
.86
.GO
0-V
06D
0R~
0VY
123
186
199
1N0
1SB
1VV
2.D
203
28-
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
41~
4R4
53G
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
6TJ
78A
7R6
85S
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
9M8
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAGAY
AAHNG
AAHSB
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABPPZ
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTHY
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACFII
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACIHN
ACIOK
ACIPQ
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACNCT
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACREJ
ACREN
ACYUM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADLEJ
ADMHG
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZJE
ADZKW
AEAQA
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFFDN
AFFNX
AFGCZ
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKNXY
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALPBS
ALSLI
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARALO
ARMRJ
ASOEW
ASPBG
ASUFR
AVWKF
AXYYD
AYQZM
AZFZN
AZQEC
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BKOMP
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
C6C
CAG
CCPQU
CJNVE
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
DWQXO
EBLON
EBS
ECVKH
EGL
EIOEI
EJD
ESBYG
ESI
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNUQQ
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GUQSH
GXS
H13
HEHIP
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HYQOX
HZ~
H~9
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IRVIT
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
LAK
LLZTM
LPU
M0P
M2M
M2O
M2R
M2S
M4Y
MA-
MQGED
MVM
N2Q
NB0
NDZJH
NHB
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O-F
O-J
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OHT
OVD
P19
P2P
P9L
PF-
PQEDU
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PSYQQ
PT4
PT5
Q2X
Q5E
QF4
QII
QM7
QN7
QO5
QOK
QOS
QXPDG
R-Y
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPX
RSV
RZC
RZD
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S3B
SAP
SBS
SBU
SCLPG
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SZN
T13
T16
TAE
TEORI
TN5
TSG
TSK
TSV
TUC
TWZ
U2A
U9L
UBC
UG4
UHB
UKHRP
UKR
UMD
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
VQA
VXZ
W23
W48
WH7
WIP
WK6
WK8
XJT
XOL
XSW
XZL
YCJ
YIN
YLTOR
YR2
YZZ
Z45
Z83
Z92
ZCA
ZCG
ZGI
ZHY
ZMTXR
ZMU
ZOVNA
~A9
~EX
~P2
~P3
~PJ
~PN
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
ADHKG
ADXHL
AETEA
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
PMKZF
PVKVW
ABRTQ
NPM
PMFND
POGQB
PRQQA
7U4
7XB
8FK
BHHNA
DWI
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGEN
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
WZK
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-3aef1bef30405394f25a9b4594fb420e76bc8c9bd7c38b70553557bcba7cbc1f3
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0360-0025
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:42:18 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 23:04:11 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 14:24:14 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:59:29 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:25:21 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:43 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:34:56 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3-4
Keywords Masculinity
Femininity
Gender equality
Education policy
Gender
Physics
STEM
Language English
License Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c470t-3aef1bef30405394f25a9b4594fb420e76bc8c9bd7c38b70553557bcba7cbc1f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-3930-6798
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z
PMID 28133410
PQID 1858392989
PQPubID 48257
PageCount 19
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5237440
proquest_miscellaneous_1862939899
proquest_journals_1858392989
pubmed_primary_28133410
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_016_0669_z
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11199_016_0669_z
springer_journals_10_1007_s11199_016_0669_z
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
– name: United States
PublicationSubtitle A Journal of Research
PublicationTitle Sex roles
PublicationTitleAbbrev Sex Roles
PublicationTitleAlternate Sex Roles
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Questions for Governors. (2014a). What proportion of students choose to continue each of the sciences (physics, chemistry and biology) and maths at A level? Retrieved from http://www.questionsforgovernors.co.uk/choices/what-proportion-of-students-chooses-to-continue-each-of-the-sciences-physics-chemistry-and-biology-and-maths-at-a-level/.
CheryanSSiyJVichayapaiMDruryBKimSDo female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social Psychological and Personality Science2011265666410.1177/1948550611405218
Lowell, B. L., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009, November 7). Steady as she goes? Three generations of students through the science and engineering pipeline. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.
Spears BrownCLeaperCLatina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescenceSex Roles20106386087010.1007/s11199-010-9856-5
FarengaSJJoyceBAIntentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differencesScience Education199983557510.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O
Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016a). The “exceptional” physics/ engineering girl: A sociological analysis of longitudinal data from girls aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
CaleonISSubramaniamRAttitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in SingaporeJournal of Research in Science Teaching20084594095410.1002/tea.20250
DaviesBShards of glass. Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities1993SydneyAllen & Unwin
OsborneJArguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourseScience201032846346610.1126/science.118394420413492
FrancisBRe/theorising gender: Female masculinity and male femininity in the classroom?Gender and Education20102247749010.1080/09540250903341146
VolmanMTen DamGEqual but different: Contradictions in the development of gender identityBritish Journal of Sociology of Education19981952954510.1080/0142569980190405
BoalerJSengupta-IrvingTSkeltonCFrancisBSmulyanLNature, neglect and nuance: Changing accounts of sex, gender and mathematicsThe Sage handbook of gender and education2006LondonSage20722010.4135/9781848607996.n16
BakhtinMThe dialogic imagination: Four essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.).1981AustinUniversity of Texas Press
HeyVThe contrasting social logics of sociality and survival: Cultures of classed be/longing in late modernitySociology20053985587210.1177/0038038505058369
WongBIdentifying with science: A case of two 13-year-old ‘high achieving working class’ British Asian girlsInternational Journal of Science Education201234436510.1080/09500693.2010.551671
CheryanSDruryBVichayapaiMEnduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirationsPsychology of Women Quarterly201337727910.1177/0361684312459328
Franics, B. (2002). Is the future really female? The impact and implications of gender for 14-16 year olds’ career choices, British Journal of Education and Work, 15(1), 75–88. www.tandf.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13639080120106730.
FrancisBThe gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject abilityOxford Review of Education200026354810.1080/030549800103845
HutchinsonJBentleyKSTEM subjects and jobs: A longitudinal perspective of attitudes among key stage 3 students, 2008–20102011DerbyInternational Centre for Guidance Studies, University of Derby
LewisJLMenziesHNájeraEIPageRNRethinking trends in minority participation in the sciencesScience Education20099396197710.1002/sce.20338
SeymourEHewittNMTalking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences1997Boulder, COWestview
SmithEIs there a crisis in school science education in the UK?Educational Review20106218920210.1080/00131911003637014
Council of Canadian Academies.Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity2015OttowaCouncil of Canadian Academies
HardingSWhose science? Whose knowledge?1991BuckinghamOpen University Press
CarloneHB(Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physicsJournal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering20039173410.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20
RoseNPowers of freedom: Reframing political thought1999Cambridge, MACambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511488856
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York & London: Routledge.
DaviesBFrogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender1989SydneyAllen & Unwin
WalkerdineVSchoolgirl fictions1990LondonVerso
FrancisBGender monoglossia, gender heteroglossia: The potential of Bakhtin’s work for re-conceptualising genderJournal of Gender Studies20122111510.1080/09589236.2012.639174
XieYKillewaldAIs American science in decline?2012Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press10.4159/harvard.9780674065048
Questions for Governors. (2014b). What proportion of students choosing each of physics, chemistry, biology and maths A levels are female? Retrieved from http://www.questionsforgovernors.co.uk/secondary/science-and-maths/choices/what-proportion-students-female/.
ProninESteeleCRossLIdentity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematicsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology20044015216810.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X
BurmanEParkerIDiscourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action1993LondonRoutledge
HardingSTaking responsibility for our own gender, race, class: Transforming science and the social studies of scienceRethinking Marxism1989281910.1080/08935698908657865
FoucaultMPower/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–19771980New York, NYPantheon
FraserNNicholsonLFeminism/postmodernism1990LondonRoutledge
Campaign for Science and Engineering.Improving diversity in STEM2014LondonAuthor
House of LordsHigher education in science, technology, engineering and mathematic subjects2012LondonThe Stationery Office Limited
GorardSSeeBHThe impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in scienceStudies in Science Education2009459312910.1080/03057260802681821
American Association of University WomenWhy so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics2010Washington, DCAuthor
FrancisBBurkePReadBThe submergence and re-emergence of gender in undergraduate accounts of university experienceGender & Education20132611710.1080/09540253.2013.860433
LandivarLCDisparities in the STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin: American Community Survey Reports2013Washington, DCUS Census Bureau
Confederation of British Industry.Learning to grow: What employers need from education and skills. Education and skills survey 20122012LondonAuthor
Danish EU Presidency. (2012, May). Danish EU Presidency, International roundtable on gender and social mobility. Roundtable conducted in Copenhagen, Denmark
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. (2015). Reaching the full potential of STEM for women and the U.S economy. Retrieved from https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/reaching-full-potential-stem-women-and-us-economy .
HardingSIs gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? A survey of issuesDialectica198236436310.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb00818.x
SmithEDo we need more scientists? A long-term view of patterns of participation in UK undergraduate science programmesCambridge Journal of Education20104028129810.1080/0305764X.2010.502886
ArcherLDeWittJOsborneJIs science for us? Black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careersScience Education20159919923710.1002/sce.21146
Equal Opportunities Commission. (2006). Facts about men and women in Great Britain 2006. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/gender/publications/UK/ Facts_about_W&M_GB_2006.pdf.
FennemaEPetersonPLAutonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of sex-related differences in mathematicsEducational Studies in Mathematics19851630931110.1007/BF00776738
ReissMHoylesCMujtabaTRiazi-FarzadBRodd.MSimonSStylianidouFUnderstanding participation rates in post-16 mathematics and physics: Conceptualising and operationalising the UPMAP projectInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education2011927330210.1007/s10763-011-9286-z
GreenwoodCHarrisonMVignolesAThe labour market value of STEM qualifications and occupations2011LondonRoyal Academy of Engineering
WalkerdineVCounting girls out1989LondonVirago
Calabrese BartonATanEFunds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid spaceJournal of Research in Science Teaching200946507310.1002/tea.20269
SmithEGorardSIs there a shortage of scientists? A re-analysis of supply for the UKBritish Journal of Educational Studies20115915917710.1080/00071005.2011.578567
FrancisBAn investigation of the discourses children draw on in their constructions of genderJournal of Applied Social Psychology19992930031610.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01388.x
WalkerdineVThe mastery of reason1988CambridgeRoutledge & Kegan Paul
Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016b). Stratifying science: A Bourdieusian analysis of student views and experiences of school selective practices in relation to “Triple Science” at KS4 in England. Research Papers in Education.
EliasPJonesPMcWhinnieSRepresentation of ethnic groups in chemistry and physics: A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Institute of Physics2006LondonRoyal Society of Chemistry/Institute of Physics
BaumanZWork, consumerism and the new poor2005Buckingham, UKOpen University Press
MendickHMathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS level in England?British Journal of Sociology of Education20052623525110.1080/0142569042000294192
Royal Academy of EngineeringJobs and growth: The importance of engineering skills to the UK economy2012LondonRoyal A
669_CR81
J Tripney (669_CR80) 2010
S Cheryan (669_CR20) 2011; 2
E Fennema (669_CR32) 1985; 16
V Walkerdine (669_CR85) 1989
E Pronin (669_CR65) 2004; 40
IS Caleon (669_CR17) 2008; 45
Campaign for Science and Engineering. (669_CR18) 2014
B Francis (669_CR38) 2012; 21
B Wong (669_CR87) 2012; 34
SJ Farenga (669_CR31) 1999; 83
B Davies (669_CR26) 1989
V Hey (669_CR50) 2005; 39
Institute of Mechanical Engineers (669_CR53) 2010
E Smith (669_CR76) 2011; 59
B Davies (669_CR27) 1993
S Gorard (669_CR44) 2009; 45
V Walkerdine (669_CR86) 1990
669_CR42
E Burman (669_CR14) 1993
L Archer (669_CR2) 2014
M Foucault (669_CR33) 1980
S Harding (669_CR48) 1991
LC Landivar (669_CR55) 2013
S Harding (669_CR46) 1982; 36
A Calabrese Barton (669_CR16) 2009; 46
AT Danielsson (669_CR24) 2012; 24
E Smith (669_CR74) 2010; 62
B Francis (669_CR35) 2000; 26
E Smith (669_CR75) 2011; 37
Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA). (669_CR7) 2013
M Volman (669_CR83) 1998; 19
B Francis (669_CR34) 1999; 29
M Bakhtin (669_CR8) 1981
S Cheryan (669_CR21) 2013; 37
669_CR36
669_CR30
T Mujtaba (669_CR60) 2013; 35
E Seymour (669_CR72) 1997
HM Treasury (669_CR79) 2011
Institute of Physics (669_CR54) 2012
CMA Haworth (669_CR49) 2008; 30
H Mendick (669_CR59) 2005; 26
J Boaler (669_CR11) 2006
JL Lewis (669_CR57) 2009; 93
J Hutchinson (669_CR52) 2011
U.S. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (669_CR82) 2010
I Balbus (669_CR9) 1987
B Francis (669_CR37) 2010; 22
E Smith (669_CR73) 2010; 40
A Gonsalves (669_CR43) 2014; 9
C Greenwood (669_CR45) 2011
HB Carlone (669_CR19) 2003; 9
(669_CR41) 1990
American Association of University Women (669_CR1) 2010
N Rose (669_CR69) 1999
669_CR25
L Archer (669_CR3) 2012; 49
669_CR67
B Francis (669_CR40) 2013; 26
Council of Canadian Academies. (669_CR23) 2015
669_CR66
J Perkins (669_CR64) 2013
M Brown (669_CR13) 2008; 26
S Harding (669_CR47) 1989; 2
L Orthia (669_CR62) 2016; 75
B Francis (669_CR39) 2003; 24
669_CR6
Y Xie (669_CR88) 2012
669_CR5
M Ong (669_CR61) 2005; 52
S Strand (669_CR78) 2012; 38
M Reiss (669_CR68) 2011; 9
L Archer (669_CR4) 2015; 99
Z Bauman (669_CR10) 2005
Confederation of British Industry. (669_CR22) 2012
P Bourdieu (669_CR12) 1984
Royal Society (669_CR71) 2008
House of Lords (669_CR51) 2012
J Osborne (669_CR63) 2010; 328
Royal Academy of Engineering (669_CR70) 2012
669_CR58
669_CR15
669_CR56
P Elias (669_CR29) 2006
C Spears Brown (669_CR77) 2010; 63
AB Diekman (669_CR28) 2011; 101
V Walkerdine (669_CR84) 1988
References_xml – reference: DaviesBShards of glass. Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities1993SydneyAllen & Unwin
– reference: American Association of University WomenWhy so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics2010Washington, DCAuthor
– reference: ArcherLDeWittJOsborneJIs science for us? Black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careersScience Education20159919923710.1002/sce.21146
– reference: FrancisBBurkePReadBThe submergence and re-emergence of gender in undergraduate accounts of university experienceGender & Education20132611710.1080/09540253.2013.860433
– reference: DaviesBFrogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender1989SydneyAllen & Unwin
– reference: FraserNNicholsonLFeminism/postmodernism1990LondonRoutledge
– reference: BrownMBrownPBibbyT“I would rather die”: Reasons given by 16-year-olds for not continuing their study of mathematicsResearch in Mathematics Education200826631648
– reference: Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016a). The “exceptional” physics/ engineering girl: A sociological analysis of longitudinal data from girls aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
– reference: CaleonISSubramaniamRAttitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in SingaporeJournal of Research in Science Teaching20084594095410.1002/tea.20250
– reference: FarengaSJJoyceBAIntentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differencesScience Education199983557510.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O
– reference: EliasPJonesPMcWhinnieSRepresentation of ethnic groups in chemistry and physics: A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Institute of Physics2006LondonRoyal Society of Chemistry/Institute of Physics
– reference: TripneyJNewmanMBangpanMNizaCMackintoshMSinclairJSubject choice in STEM: Factors influencing young people (aged 14–19) in education about STEM subject choices: A systematic review of the UK literature.2010LondonEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI).
– reference: LewisJLMenziesHNájeraEIPageRNRethinking trends in minority participation in the sciencesScience Education20099396197710.1002/sce.20338
– reference: Royal Academy of EngineeringJobs and growth: The importance of engineering skills to the UK economy2012LondonRoyal Academy of Engineering
– reference: BakhtinMThe dialogic imagination: Four essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.).1981AustinUniversity of Texas Press
– reference: FrancisBGender monoglossia, gender heteroglossia: The potential of Bakhtin’s work for re-conceptualising genderJournal of Gender Studies20122111510.1080/09589236.2012.639174
– reference: BaumanZWork, consumerism and the new poor2005Buckingham, UKOpen University Press
– reference: Calabrese BartonATanEFunds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid spaceJournal of Research in Science Teaching200946507310.1002/tea.20269
– reference: SmithEGorardSIs there a shortage of scientists? A re-analysis of supply for the UKBritish Journal of Educational Studies20115915917710.1080/00071005.2011.578567
– reference: BalbusIBenhabibSCornellDDisciplining women: Michel Foucault and the power of feminist discourseFeminism as critique1987Minneapolis, MNUniversity of Minnesota Press110127
– reference: DiekmanABClarkEKJohnstonAMBrownERSteinbergMMalleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspectiveJournal of Personality and Social Psychology201110190291810.1037/a002519921859224
– reference: WalkerdineVThe mastery of reason1988CambridgeRoutledge & Kegan Paul
– reference: Lowell, B. L., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009, November 7). Steady as she goes? Three generations of students through the science and engineering pipeline. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.
– reference: GonsalvesA“Physics and the girly girl—there is a contradiction somewhere”: Doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physicsCultural Studies in Science Education2014950352110.1007/s11422-012-9447-6
– reference: Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA).STEM country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education2013Melbourne, AustraliaACOLA
– reference: TreasuryHMThe plan for growth2011LondonBIS
– reference: BoalerJSengupta-IrvingTSkeltonCFrancisBSmulyanLNature, neglect and nuance: Changing accounts of sex, gender and mathematicsThe Sage handbook of gender and education2006LondonSage20722010.4135/9781848607996.n16
– reference: VolmanMTen DamGEqual but different: Contradictions in the development of gender identityBritish Journal of Sociology of Education19981952954510.1080/0142569980190405
– reference: OrthiaLMorgainRThe gendered culture of scientific competence: A study of scientist characters in Doctor Who 1963–2013Sex Roles201675799410.1007/s11199-016-0597-y
– reference: GorardSSeeBHThe impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in scienceStudies in Science Education2009459312910.1080/03057260802681821
– reference: LandivarLCDisparities in the STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin: American Community Survey Reports2013Washington, DCUS Census Bureau
– reference: SmithEWomen into science and engineering? Gendered participation in higher education STEM subjectsBritish Educational Research Journal201137993101410.1080/01411926.2010.515019
– reference: WongBIdentifying with science: A case of two 13-year-old ‘high achieving working class’ British Asian girlsInternational Journal of Science Education201234436510.1080/09500693.2010.551671
– reference: Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016b). Stratifying science: A Bourdieusian analysis of student views and experiences of school selective practices in relation to “Triple Science” at KS4 in England. Research Papers in Education.
– reference: BourdieuPDistinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste1984Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press
– reference: FrancisBReadBMellingLRobsonJUniversity lecturers’ perceptions of gender and undergraduate writingBritish Journal of Sociology of Education20032435737310.1080/01425690301891
– reference: Campaign for Science and Engineering.Improving diversity in STEM2014LondonAuthor
– reference: CheryanSSiyJVichayapaiMDruryBKimSDo female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social Psychological and Personality Science2011265666410.1177/1948550611405218
– reference: Gibb, N. (2015, June 11). The social justice case for an academic curriculum. Speech presented at the Policy Exchange, London, UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-the-social-justice-case-for-an-academic-curriculum .
– reference: HardingSTaking responsibility for our own gender, race, class: Transforming science and the social studies of scienceRethinking Marxism1989281910.1080/08935698908657865
– reference: FrancisBThe gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject abilityOxford Review of Education200026354810.1080/030549800103845
– reference: Franics, B. (2002). Is the future really female? The impact and implications of gender for 14-16 year olds’ career choices, British Journal of Education and Work, 15(1), 75–88. www.tandf.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13639080120106730.
– reference: HaworthCMADalePPlominRA twin study into the genetic and environmental influences on academic performance in science in nine-year-old boys and girlsInternational Journal of Science Education2008301003102510.1080/09500690701324190201116702811965
– reference: PerkinsJProfessor John Perkins’ review of engineering skills2013LondonBIS
– reference: WalkerdineVSchoolgirl fictions1990LondonVerso
– reference: Institute of Mechanical EngineersWhen STEM? A question of age2010LondonInstitution of Mechanical Engineers
– reference: SmithEIs there a crisis in school science education in the UK?Educational Review20106218920210.1080/00131911003637014
– reference: House of LordsHigher education in science, technology, engineering and mathematic subjects2012LondonThe Stationery Office Limited
– reference: Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York & London: Routledge.
– reference: OsborneJArguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourseScience201032846346610.1126/science.118394420413492
– reference: SeymourEHewittNMTalking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences1997Boulder, COWestview
– reference: WalkerdineVCounting girls out1989LondonVirago
– reference: U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. (2015). Reaching the full potential of STEM for women and the U.S economy. Retrieved from https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/reaching-full-potential-stem-women-and-us-economy .
– reference: U.S. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.Report to the President and Congress: Designing a digital future: Federally funded research and development in networking and information technology2010Washington, DCExecutive Office to the President of the United States
– reference: Equal Opportunities Commission. (2006). Facts about men and women in Great Britain 2006. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/gender/publications/UK/ Facts_about_W&M_GB_2006.pdf.
– reference: ArcherLDeWittJHenriksenEKDillonJRyderJScience aspirations and gender identity: Lessons from the ASPIRES ProjectUnderstanding student participation and choice in science technology and education2014DordrechtSpringer89102
– reference: CarloneHB(Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physicsJournal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering20039173410.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20
– reference: OngMBody projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race and scienceSocial Problems20055259361710.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593
– reference: Royal SocietyScience and mathematics education, 14–19: A ‘state of nation’ report on the participation and attainment of 14–19 year olds in science and mathematics in the UK, 1996–20072008LondonRoyal Society
– reference: SmithEDo we need more scientists? A long-term view of patterns of participation in UK undergraduate science programmesCambridge Journal of Education20104028129810.1080/0305764X.2010.502886
– reference: StrandSThe White British-Black Caribbean achievement gap: Tests, tiers and teacher expectationsBritish Educational Research Journal2012387510110.1080/01411926.2010.526702
– reference: BurmanEParkerIDiscourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action1993LondonRoutledge
– reference: DanielssonATExploring woman university physics students ‘doing gender’ and ‘doing physics’Gender and Education201224253910.1080/09540253.2011.565040
– reference: HeyVThe contrasting social logics of sociality and survival: Cultures of classed be/longing in late modernitySociology20053985587210.1177/0038038505058369
– reference: Danish EU Presidency. (2012, May). Danish EU Presidency, International roundtable on gender and social mobility. Roundtable conducted in Copenhagen, Denmark
– reference: Spears BrownCLeaperCLatina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescenceSex Roles20106386087010.1007/s11199-010-9856-5
– reference: FrancisBAn investigation of the discourses children draw on in their constructions of genderJournal of Applied Social Psychology19992930031610.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01388.x
– reference: HardingSIs gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? A survey of issuesDialectica198236436310.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb00818.x
– reference: HardingSWhose science? Whose knowledge?1991BuckinghamOpen University Press
– reference: HutchinsonJBentleyKSTEM subjects and jobs: A longitudinal perspective of attitudes among key stage 3 students, 2008–20102011DerbyInternational Centre for Guidance Studies, University of Derby
– reference: XieYKillewaldAIs American science in decline?2012Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press10.4159/harvard.9780674065048
– reference: RoseNPowers of freedom: Reframing political thought1999Cambridge, MACambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511488856
– reference: ArcherLDeWittJOsborneJDillonJWillisBWongBScience aspirations and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with scienceAmerican Education Research Journal20124988190810.3102/0002831211433290
– reference: ProninESteeleCRossLIdentity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematicsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology20044015216810.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X
– reference: FrancisBRe/theorising gender: Female masculinity and male femininity in the classroom?Gender and Education20102247749010.1080/09540250903341146
– reference: Institute of PhysicsIt’s different for girls: The influence of schools – An exploration of data from the National Pupil Database looking at progression to A-level physics in 2011 from different types of school at Key Stage 42012LondonInstitute of Physics
– reference: Confederation of British Industry.Learning to grow: What employers need from education and skills. Education and skills survey 20122012LondonAuthor
– reference: MujtabaTReissMJWhat sort of girl wants to study physics after the age of 16? Findings from a large-scale UK surveyInternational Journal of Science Education2013352979299810.1080/09500693.2012.681076
– reference: FoucaultMPower/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–19771980New York, NYPantheon
– reference: FennemaEPetersonPLAutonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of sex-related differences in mathematicsEducational Studies in Mathematics19851630931110.1007/BF00776738
– reference: Questions for Governors. (2014a). What proportion of students choose to continue each of the sciences (physics, chemistry and biology) and maths at A level? Retrieved from http://www.questionsforgovernors.co.uk/choices/what-proportion-of-students-chooses-to-continue-each-of-the-sciences-physics-chemistry-and-biology-and-maths-at-a-level/.
– reference: CheryanSDruryBVichayapaiMEnduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirationsPsychology of Women Quarterly201337727910.1177/0361684312459328
– reference: Council of Canadian Academies.Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity2015OttowaCouncil of Canadian Academies
– reference: Larson, R. C. (2014). STEM is for everyone. World Innovation Summit for Education Opinions. Retrieved from http://www.wise-qatar.org/content/dr-larson-stem-everyone.
– reference: Questions for Governors. (2014b). What proportion of students choosing each of physics, chemistry, biology and maths A levels are female? Retrieved from http://www.questionsforgovernors.co.uk/secondary/science-and-maths/choices/what-proportion-students-female/.
– reference: GreenwoodCHarrisonMVignolesAThe labour market value of STEM qualifications and occupations2011LondonRoyal Academy of Engineering
– reference: ReissMHoylesCMujtabaTRiazi-FarzadBRodd.MSimonSStylianidouFUnderstanding participation rates in post-16 mathematics and physics: Conceptualising and operationalising the UPMAP projectInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education2011927330210.1007/s10763-011-9286-z
– reference: MendickHMathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS level in England?British Journal of Sociology of Education20052623525110.1080/0142569042000294192
– volume-title: Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity
  year: 2015
  ident: 669_CR23
– volume: 29
  start-page: 300
  year: 1999
  ident: 669_CR34
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01388.x
– volume: 9
  start-page: 503
  year: 2014
  ident: 669_CR43
  publication-title: Cultural Studies in Science Education
  doi: 10.1007/s11422-012-9447-6
– volume-title: The labour market value of STEM qualifications and occupations
  year: 2011
  ident: 669_CR45
– volume-title: Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977
  year: 1980
  ident: 669_CR33
– volume: 40
  start-page: 281
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR73
  publication-title: Cambridge Journal of Education
  doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2010.502886
– volume: 34
  start-page: 43
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR87
  publication-title: International Journal of Science Education
  doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.551671
– ident: 669_CR66
– start-page: 207
  volume-title: The Sage handbook of gender and education
  year: 2006
  ident: 669_CR11
  doi: 10.4135/9781848607996.n16
– volume: 328
  start-page: 463
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR63
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1183944
– volume: 75
  start-page: 79
  year: 2016
  ident: 669_CR62
  publication-title: Sex Roles
  doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0597-y
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR38
  publication-title: Journal of Gender Studies
  doi: 10.1080/09589236.2012.639174
– volume-title: Whose science? Whose knowledge?
  year: 1991
  ident: 669_CR48
– volume-title: Learning to grow: What employers need from education and skills. Education and skills survey 2012
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR22
– ident: 669_CR56
– ident: 669_CR81
– volume-title: Jobs and growth: The importance of engineering skills to the UK economy
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR70
– volume: 36
  start-page: 43
  year: 1982
  ident: 669_CR46
  publication-title: Dialectica
  doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb00818.x
– volume-title: Report to the President and Congress: Designing a digital future: Federally funded research and development in networking and information technology
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR82
– volume: 39
  start-page: 855
  year: 2005
  ident: 669_CR50
  publication-title: Sociology
  doi: 10.1177/0038038505058369
– volume-title: Higher education in science, technology, engineering and mathematic subjects
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR51
– volume: 49
  start-page: 881
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR3
  publication-title: American Education Research Journal
  doi: 10.3102/0002831211433290
– volume-title: Disparities in the STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin: American Community Survey Reports
  year: 2013
  ident: 669_CR55
– volume: 63
  start-page: 860
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR77
  publication-title: Sex Roles
  doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5
– volume: 62
  start-page: 189
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR74
  publication-title: Educational Review
  doi: 10.1080/00131911003637014
– volume-title: Shards of glass. Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities
  year: 1993
  ident: 669_CR27
– volume: 93
  start-page: 961
  year: 2009
  ident: 669_CR57
  publication-title: Science Education
  doi: 10.1002/sce.20338
– volume: 40
  start-page: 152
  year: 2004
  ident: 669_CR65
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X
– volume: 59
  start-page: 159
  year: 2011
  ident: 669_CR76
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Studies
  doi: 10.1080/00071005.2011.578567
– volume: 16
  start-page: 309
  year: 1985
  ident: 669_CR32
  publication-title: Educational Studies in Mathematics
  doi: 10.1007/BF00776738
– volume: 37
  start-page: 72
  year: 2013
  ident: 669_CR21
  publication-title: Psychology of Women Quarterly
  doi: 10.1177/0361684312459328
– volume: 83
  start-page: 55
  year: 1999
  ident: 669_CR31
  publication-title: Science Education
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O
– volume-title: Representation of ethnic groups in chemistry and physics: A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Institute of Physics
  year: 2006
  ident: 669_CR29
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2979
  year: 2013
  ident: 669_CR60
  publication-title: International Journal of Science Education
  doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.681076
– volume-title: Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action
  year: 1993
  ident: 669_CR14
– volume: 101
  start-page: 902
  year: 2011
  ident: 669_CR28
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/a0025199
– volume-title: Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste
  year: 1984
  ident: 669_CR12
– volume-title: Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought
  year: 1999
  ident: 669_CR69
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511488856
– ident: 669_CR30
– volume: 26
  start-page: 235251
  year: 2005
  ident: 669_CR59
  publication-title: British Journal of Sociology of Education
  doi: 10.1080/0142569042000294192
– ident: 669_CR6
  doi: 10.1080/02671522.2016.1219382
– volume-title: Feminism/postmodernism
  year: 1990
  ident: 669_CR41
– volume: 45
  start-page: 93
  year: 2009
  ident: 669_CR44
  publication-title: Studies in Science Education
  doi: 10.1080/03057260802681821
– volume: 99
  start-page: 199
  year: 2015
  ident: 669_CR4
  publication-title: Science Education
  doi: 10.1002/sce.21146
– ident: 669_CR36
  doi: 10.1080/13639080120106730
– ident: 669_CR5
– volume: 45
  start-page: 940
  year: 2008
  ident: 669_CR17
  publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching
  doi: 10.1002/tea.20250/
– volume-title: Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender
  year: 1989
  ident: 669_CR26
– volume-title: The mastery of reason
  year: 1988
  ident: 669_CR84
– volume-title: Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences
  year: 1997
  ident: 669_CR72
– volume-title: The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.).
  year: 1981
  ident: 669_CR8
– start-page: 110
  volume-title: Feminism as critique
  year: 1987
  ident: 669_CR9
– volume: 9
  start-page: 273
  year: 2011
  ident: 669_CR68
  publication-title: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
  doi: 10.1007/s10763-011-9286-z
– volume-title: Science and mathematics education, 14–19: A ‘state of nation’ report on the participation and attainment of 14–19 year olds in science and mathematics in the UK, 1996–2007
  year: 2008
  ident: 669_CR71
– volume: 2
  start-page: 656
  year: 2011
  ident: 669_CR20
  publication-title: Social Psychological and Personality Science
  doi: 10.1177/1948550611405218
– ident: 669_CR58
– volume: 26
  start-page: 631
  year: 2008
  ident: 669_CR13
  publication-title: Research in Mathematics Education
  doi: 10.1080/14794800801915814
– volume-title: Improving diversity in STEM
  year: 2014
  ident: 669_CR18
– volume-title: It’s different for girls: The influence of schools – An exploration of data from the National Pupil Database looking at progression to A-level physics in 2011 from different types of school at Key Stage 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR54
– start-page: 89
  volume-title: Understanding student participation and choice in science technology and education
  year: 2014
  ident: 669_CR2
– volume-title: Counting girls out
  year: 1989
  ident: 669_CR85
– volume: 37
  start-page: 993
  year: 2011
  ident: 669_CR75
  publication-title: British Educational Research Journal
  doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.515019
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 669_CR40
  publication-title: Gender & Education
  doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.860433
– volume-title: Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR1
– volume: 26
  start-page: 35
  year: 2000
  ident: 669_CR35
  publication-title: Oxford Review of Education
  doi: 10.1080/030549800103845
– volume-title: The plan for growth
  year: 2011
  ident: 669_CR79
– volume-title: Subject choice in STEM: Factors influencing young people (aged 14–19) in education about STEM subject choices: A systematic review of the UK literature.
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR80
– volume: 24
  start-page: 25
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR24
  publication-title: Gender and Education
  doi: 10.1080/09540253.2011.565040
– volume: 9
  start-page: 17
  year: 2003
  ident: 669_CR19
  publication-title: Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
  doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20
– volume-title: STEM subjects and jobs: A longitudinal perspective of attitudes among key stage 3 students, 2008–2010
  year: 2011
  ident: 669_CR52
– ident: 669_CR67
– volume-title: When STEM? A question of age
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR53
– volume: 2
  start-page: 8
  year: 1989
  ident: 669_CR47
  publication-title: Rethinking Marxism
  doi: 10.1080/08935698908657865
– volume-title: Is American science in decline?
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR88
  doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674065048
– ident: 669_CR25
– ident: 669_CR42
– volume: 22
  start-page: 477
  year: 2010
  ident: 669_CR37
  publication-title: Gender and Education
  doi: 10.1080/09540250903341146
– volume: 19
  start-page: 529
  year: 1998
  ident: 669_CR83
  publication-title: British Journal of Sociology of Education
  doi: 10.1080/0142569980190405
– volume: 52
  start-page: 593
  year: 2005
  ident: 669_CR61
  publication-title: Social Problems
  doi: 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593
– volume: 38
  start-page: 75
  year: 2012
  ident: 669_CR78
  publication-title: British Educational Research Journal
  doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.526702
– volume: 46
  start-page: 50
  year: 2009
  ident: 669_CR16
  publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching
  doi: 10.1002/tea.20269
– ident: 669_CR15
– volume: 24
  start-page: 357
  year: 2003
  ident: 669_CR39
  publication-title: British Journal of Sociology of Education
  doi: 10.1080/01425690301891
– volume-title: Professor John Perkins’ review of engineering skills
  year: 2013
  ident: 669_CR64
– volume-title: Work, consumerism and the new poor
  year: 2005
  ident: 669_CR10
– volume-title: STEM country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
  year: 2013
  ident: 669_CR7
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1003
  year: 2008
  ident: 669_CR49
  publication-title: International Journal of Science Education
  doi: 10.1080/09500690701324190
– volume-title: Schoolgirl fictions
  year: 1990
  ident: 669_CR86
SSID ssj0001004
Score 2.4716704
Snippet The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 156
SubjectTerms Adolescents
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Careers
Citizen Participation
Compulsory Education
Cultural Capital
Data collection
Discourse analysis
Discrimination
Education policy
Educational Policy
Engineering
Equality
Ethnicity
Females
Gender Discrimination
Gender equity
Gender Issues
Gender Studies
Individualized Instruction
Masculinity
Mathematics Activities
Medicine/Public Health
Narratives
Original
Original Article
Parents & parenting
Physical sciences
Physics
Politics of Education
Psychology
Science education
Scientific Literacy
Sex Fairness
Sexes
Sexism
Social Class
Social Status
Sociology
STEM Education
White Students
Working women
Young Adults
Youth
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  dbid: U2A
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Pa9VAEB-0Xnop-vwXfZYRREEJJJvNJuvtIZYiVBR82FvIbjZY-kikeT20J29-hn69fhJnNn_aZ1UQcgjJZJMws5PfZmZ-A_BCqqqqtBKhKTMdSlPLUFtBC1ejnS3JxKTjAueDj2p_KT8cpodDHXc3ZruPIUnvqa-K3eKYK-ZjxVXzOjy_DXdSXrqTES_FYnK_TIHWByi5ZFqkYyjzT0NsfoxuIMybiZK_RUv9R2jvLuwM6BEXvbrvwS3XzGB7cmJnM5j39bb41a3q8sThSxwPtCfHM9jxHStfdTjkD96Hn2QoyG07RyJZbGv0eaG2w5I2_HzKnBIdVynRQKszPPDZqwRPkdwO_8d5i95p4Cefjn7546Kj3SlhhgfsO9Zh3-sPjxpc-EaNuG7Hez2A5d77L-_2w6E7Q2hlFq3DpHR1bFydkBtIEy1rkZbayJT2jBSRy5SxudWmymySGybtIWiTGUtGYY2N6-QhbDVt4x4DyqqKnErquGQ4FJlcMYGEqpwwWotcBRCNairsQF3OHTRWxRXpMmu24HQ11mxxHsDr6ZLvPW_Hv4Tno-6LYQp3BQEZDx5zHcDz6TRNPo6olI1rT1lGEVwiEZJ51JvKdDeR0_JfxlEA2YYRTQJM7L15pjn65gm-U5Ewb2MAb0Zzu_ZYf3uJJ_8l_RS2BQMUn38-hy2yMfeM4NXa7Prp9AtnsCBs
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title The Construction of Physics as a Quintessentially Masculine Subject: Young People’s Perceptions of Gender Issues in Access to Physics
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28133410
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1858392989
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1862939899
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5237440
Volume 76
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9RAEB9sD6F9KHp-Rc9jBVFQgskm2WR9kfO4WpSWUzysTyG72WDpkdTm-tC--387s_m4nsVCCCGZbBJ2dnay85vfALwMRZ7nUnBXZbF0Q1WErtQcf1yVNDpDFQsNJTgfHomDRfj5ODpuF9zqFlbZ2URrqPNK0xr5O5xX7FyeyA9nv12qGkXR1baExhYM0AQn-PM1-Dg7mn_rbTHxoTXRSsqf5lEX17TJc75PGfi-oCx86V5tzkw33M2bqMl_Qqd2Rtq_B3utK8kmTd_fhzumHMLuNYLBIdy1AE9dD2Gnt3SXQxg1Sbnsh1kW2blhr1h3ojo_HcKeLWv5umYtyPAB_EFtYlTbs2ObZVXB2rZZhhv7ekHEEzWlMmFDy0t2aCGu-CoMbRMt9rxn1rKwucWsY-vzNaaGmmuK2rGmHCA7KdnE1nJkq6p70kNY7M--Tw_ctoCDq8PYW7lBZgpfmSJASxEFMix4lEkVRnikQu6ZWCidaKnyWAeJIl4f9H5ipVFvtNJ-ETyC7bIqzRNgYZ57RgSFn5HH5KlEEMeEyA1XUvJEOOB1nZfqlt2cimws0zUvM_V3Sog26u_0yoE3_S1nDbXHbcKjTiPSdpTX6VonHXjRX8bxSUGXrDTVBckI9KhQBGUeNwrUP40nfoBehOdAvKFavQBxf29eKU9-WQ7wiAdE7ejA204Jr73W_z7i6e0f8Qx2ODktFpM-gm1UKfMcXa6VGsNg8unnl9m4HV9j2JqKKe4XfPIX6est3w
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9NADLdGJ8R4mKB8BQocEh8SKCK5XJMcEkIDNnVsrQraxN5C7nIRE1Uy1k6oe-ff4W_Evnx0ZWJvk_pQNa6Tk322L7Z_BngqwizLZMhdlUbSFSoXrtQcD65KGp2iiglDDc7DUTjYF58O-gcr8KfphaGyysYmWkOdlZrekb9Gv2J9eSzfHf10aWoUZVebERqVWuyY-S88sk3fbn9E-T7jfGtz78PAracKuFpE3swNUpP7yuR4jkcFlCLn_VQq0cdvSnDPRKHSsZYqi3QQKwKbQZccKY2L0Ur7eYB8r8CqCPAo04HV95uj8ZfW9hP-WpUdpX5t3m_yqLZZz_ep498PqetfuqfLnvBceHu-SvOfVK31gFs3YL0OXdlGpWs3YcUUXbh-BtCwC1dtQamedmGttazzLvSqJmD21Uzy9Niw56z5oTz-0YV1O0bzxZTVRY234DdqL6NZog26LStzVvNmKX7Y5xMCuphS6xQymszZ0JbU4qMwtIX0cukNs5aMjW2NPHIfL2p4iF01RI9V4wfZYcE27OxINiubO92G_UsR7R3oFGVh7gETWeaZMMj9lCI0T8UhYVqEmeFKSh6HDniN8BJdo6nTUI9JssCBJnknVEFH8k5OHXjZ_uWoghK5iLjXaERSW5VpstgDDjxpL6M9oCRPWpjyhGhCjOCQBGnuVgrU3o3HfoBRi-dAtKRaLQFhjS9fKQ6_W8zxPg8IStKBV40Snnms_y3i_sWLeAzXBnvD3WR3e7TzANY4BUy2Hr4HHVQv8xDDvZl6VO8xBt8ue1v_Be2maD4
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9NADLdGJ9B4mCDACBQ4JD4kULTk8nlICA22amOsKoiJvWW5y0VMVMlYO6HunX-Kvw778tGVib1N6kPVuE5O9tm-2P4Z4FkQ5XkuIu7ILBZOIIvAEYrjwVUKrTJUsUBTg_PeMNreDz4ehAdL8KfthaGyytYmGkOdV4reka-jXzG-PBHrRVMWMdocvDv-6dAEKcq0tuM0ahXZ1bNfeHybvN3ZRFk_53yw9fXDttNMGHBUELtTx8904Uld4JkelVEEBQ8zIYMQv8mAuzqOpEqUkHms_EQS8Ay651gqXJiSyit85HsNlmM8Fbk9WH6_NRx96fwAYbHVmVLq3eZhm1M1jXueR93_XkQIAMI5W_SKF0LdixWb_6RtjTcc3ILVJoxlG7Xe3YYlXVpw8xy4oQXXTXGpmliw0lnZmQX9uiGYfdPjIjvR7AVrf6hOfliwakZqvpywpsDxDvxGTWY0V7RFumVVwRreLMMP-3xKoBcTaqNCRuMZ2zPltfgoDO0ivWh6w4xVYyNTL4_cR_N6HmJXD9Rj9ShCdlSyDTNHkk2r9k53Yf9KRHsPemVV6vvAgjx3deQXXkbRmiuTiPAtolxzKQRPIhvcVnipapDVacDHOJ1jQpO8U6qmI3mnZza86v5yXMOKXEbcbzUibSzMJJ3vBxuedpfRNlDCJyt1dUo0EUZzSII0a7UCdXfjiedjBOPaEC-oVkdAuOOLV8qj7wZ_POQ-wUra8LpVwnOP9b9FPLh8EU_gBm7n9NPOcPchrHCKnUxpfB96qF36EUZ-U_m42WIMDq96V_8FxANscw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Construction+of+Physics+as+a+Quintessentially+Masculine+Subject%3A+Young+People%27s+Perceptions+of+Gender+Issues+in+Access+to+Physics&rft.jtitle=Sex+roles&rft.au=Francis%2C+Becky&rft.au=Archer%2C+Louise&rft.au=Moote%2C+Julie&rft.au=Dewitt%2C+Jen&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0360-0025&rft.eissn=1573-2762&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11199-016-0669-z&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=4301572401
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0360-0025&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0360-0025&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0360-0025&client=summon