The Construction of Physics as a Quintessentially Masculine Subject: Young People’s Perceptions of Gender Issues in Access to Physics
The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15–16 year-old adolescents and their parents....
Saved in:
Published in | Sex roles Vol. 76; no. 3-4; pp. 156 - 174 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.02.2017
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0360-0025 1573-2762 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15–16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents’ and their parents’ articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women’s access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and “hard” domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15–16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents’ and their parents’ articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women’s access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and “hard” domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity. The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15-16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents' and their parents' articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women's access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and "hard" domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity.The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15-16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents' and their parents' articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women's access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and "hard" domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity. The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council and drawing primarily on data from interviews with 132 15-16 year-old adolescents and their parents. Survey results in our study and elsewhere show strong gender disparities in anticipated pursuit of Physics after completion of compulsory education. In order to explore the constructions of gender and Physics underlying these trends, we focus on qualitative interview data, applying Foucaultian analysis of discourse to investigate gendered narratives underpinning adolescents' and their parents' articulations. This analysis reveals three key discourses at work on the topic of women's access to Physics: (a) equality of opportunity, (b) continued gender discrimination in and around Physics, and (c) Physics as quintessentially masculine. We additionally identify five distinct narratives supporting the discourse of physics as masculine. These various discourses and narratives are interrogated, and their implications explored. We conclude that it is only by disrupting prevalent constructions of the Physical sciences as a masculine and "hard" domain will we increase the presence of women in the sector. Working with young people to analyse and deconstruct the discursive assumptions made in relation to gender and Physics, as well as further work to increase accessibility and broaden representation in Physics, may be fruitful ways to challenge these longstanding associations between Physics and masculinity. |
Author | DeWitt, Jen Moote, Julie Yeomans, Lucy Francis, Becky Archer, Louise MacLeod, Emily |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Becky orcidid: 0000-0003-3930-6798 surname: Francis fullname: Francis, Becky email: B.Francis@ucl.ac.uk organization: Institute of Education, University College London – sequence: 2 givenname: Louise surname: Archer fullname: Archer, Louise organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London – sequence: 3 givenname: Julie surname: Moote fullname: Moote, Julie organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London – sequence: 4 givenname: Jen surname: DeWitt fullname: DeWitt, Jen organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London – sequence: 5 givenname: Emily surname: MacLeod fullname: MacLeod, Emily organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London – sequence: 6 givenname: Lucy surname: Yeomans fullname: Yeomans, Lucy organization: Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College London |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28133410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kt9qFDEUxoNU7Lb6AN5IwBtvRvNnMpl4IZRFa6FixXrhVUiyZ3azzCZrMiNsr7zzGXw9n8QM25ZaUAgkkN_3nfNxzhE6CDEAQk8peUkJka8ypVSpitCmIk2jqqsHaEaF5BWTDTtAM8IbUhHCxCE6ynlNCCmy-hE6ZC3lvKZkhn5ergDPY8hDGt3gY8CxwxerXfYuY1MO_jT6MEDOEAZv-n6HP5jsxt4HwJ9HuwY3vMZf4xiW-ALitoffP37l8kwOtpNfngxPISwg4bOcR8jYB3ziXLHEQ7yp9Rg97Eyf4cn1fYy-vHt7OX9fnX88PZufnFeulmSouIGOWug4qYngqu6YMMrWorxszQjIxrrWKbuQjrdWEiG4ENI6a6Szjnb8GL3Z-25Hu4GFK6mS6fU2-Y1JOx2N13__BL_Sy_hdC8ZlXZNi8OLaIMVvJc2gNz476HsTII5Z07ZhiqtWqYI-v4eu45hCiVco0XLFClaoZ3c7um3lZkYFoHvApZhzgu4WoURPe6D3e6DLHuhpD_RV0ch7GucHM82jhPL9f5Vsr8ylSlhCutP0P0V_ANIyyxg |
CODEN | SROLDH |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_berj_3767 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21822 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0308558 crossref_primary_10_1111_gwao_12249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssaho_2025_101430 crossref_primary_10_1111_gwao_12286 crossref_primary_10_1119_1_5145532 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10763_024_10483_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11422_023_10201_3 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_17_010114 crossref_primary_10_1080_01425692_2016_1253455 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2022_2097331 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_022_01292_3 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21593 crossref_primary_10_1103_Physics_14_33 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_020_01089_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2024_2343436 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_abad4a crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_acbad9 crossref_primary_10_46606_eajess2022v03i06_0231 crossref_primary_10_1002_sce_21339 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cedpsych_2022_102125 crossref_primary_10_1108_ET_02_2023_0033 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_021_00220_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2021_2021457 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_aa8f2a crossref_primary_10_1080_03043797_2020_1711707 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_017_0869_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_0270467620911589 crossref_primary_10_1093_cdj_bsae011 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21721 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21962 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_018_9770_3 crossref_primary_10_1177_09636625211002375 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_19_020134 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_ad6388 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_20_020109 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJEM_02_2023_0082 crossref_primary_10_1080_13636820_2020_1734061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techsoc_2023_102245 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_024_00472_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_021_01233_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102079 crossref_primary_10_1080_03057267_2024_2388931 crossref_primary_10_1080_21683603_2021_1945512 crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_10991 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1018241 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_018_9786_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10649_020_09986_9 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_18_020127 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41567_024_02391_6 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_20_020142 crossref_primary_10_30935_scimath_12564 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_16_010129 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44217_024_00153_3 crossref_primary_10_1119_5_0044392 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2022_102322 crossref_primary_10_1080_02680939_2019_1709130 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_19_010107 crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2019_1707679 crossref_primary_10_1002_berj_3289 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6552_ac4145 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01388.x 10.1007/s11422-012-9447-6 10.1080/0305764X.2010.502886 10.1080/09500693.2010.551671 10.4135/9781848607996.n16 10.1126/science.1183944 10.1007/s11199-016-0597-y 10.1080/09589236.2012.639174 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb00818.x 10.1177/0038038505058369 10.3102/0002831211433290 10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5 10.1080/00131911003637014 10.1002/sce.20338 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X 10.1080/00071005.2011.578567 10.1007/BF00776738 10.1177/0361684312459328 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O 10.1080/09500693.2012.681076 10.1037/a0025199 10.1017/CBO9780511488856 10.1080/0142569042000294192 10.1080/02671522.2016.1219382 10.1080/03057260802681821 10.1002/sce.21146 10.1080/13639080120106730 10.1002/tea.20250/ 10.1007/s10763-011-9286-z 10.1177/1948550611405218 10.1080/14794800801915814 10.1080/01411926.2010.515019 10.1080/09540253.2013.860433 10.1080/030549800103845 10.1080/09540253.2011.565040 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20 10.1080/08935698908657865 10.4159/harvard.9780674065048 10.1080/09540250903341146 10.1080/0142569980190405 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593 10.1080/01411926.2010.526702 10.1002/tea.20269 10.1080/01425690301891 10.1080/09500690701324190 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2016 Sex Roles is a copyright of Springer, 2017. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2016 – notice: Sex Roles is a copyright of Springer, 2017. |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION NPM 0-V 3V. 7R6 7U4 7XB 888 88B 88G 88J 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR BHHNA CCPQU CJNVE DWI DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH HEHIP M0P M2M M2O M2R M2S MBDVC PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PMKZF POGQB PQEDU PQEST PQGEN PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PRQQA PSYQQ Q9U QXPDG WZK 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z |
DatabaseName | SpringerOpen Free (Free internet resource, activated by CARLI) CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest Central (Corporate) GenderWatch Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) GenderWatch (Alumni Edition) Education Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) Social Science Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Sociological Abstracts ProQuest One Community College Education Collection Sociological Abstracts ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library Sociology Collection Education Database Psychology Database Research Library Social Science Database Sociology Database Research Library (Corporate) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Digital Collections ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest One Education ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Women's Studies ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic Diversity Collection Sociological Abstracts (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest One Education ProQuest One Psychology Research Library Prep ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Social Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Diversity Collection ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Sociology Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Sociology Social Science Premium Collection Education Collection ProQuest One Social Sciences GenderWatch (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Education Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Sociology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Digital Collections Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) ProQuest Social Science Journals GenderWatch ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Sociological Abstracts ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed ProQuest One Education |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Social Welfare & Social Work Psychology Women's Studies Engineering Physics |
EISSN | 1573-2762 |
EndPage | 174 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5237440 4301572401 28133410 10_1007_s11199_016_0669_z |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United Kingdom--UK United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom--UK – name: United States--US |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Economic and Social Research Council grantid: ES/L002841/1 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269 – fundername: ; grantid: ES/L002841/1 |
GroupedDBID | --Z -4V -55 -5G -BR -DZ -EM -W8 -Y2 -~C -~X .86 .GO 0-V 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 186 199 1N0 1SB 1VV 2.D 203 28- 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 41~ 4R4 53G 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 6TJ 78A 7R6 85S 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X 9M8 AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAGAY AAHNG AAHSB AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIVO ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABPPZ ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACFII ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACHSB ACHXU ACIHN ACIOK ACIPQ ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACNCT ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACREJ ACREN ACYUM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADLEJ ADMHG ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZJE ADZKW AEAQA AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFFDN AFFNX AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKNXY ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALPBS ALSLI ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARALO ARMRJ ASOEW ASPBG ASUFR AVWKF AXYYD AYQZM AZFZN AZQEC B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BKOMP BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI C6C CAG CCPQU CJNVE COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EBLON EBS ECVKH EGL EIOEI EJD ESBYG ESI F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GUQSH GXS H13 HEHIP HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HYQOX HZ~ H~9 I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IRVIT ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW LAK LLZTM LPU M0P M2M M2O M2R M2S M4Y MA- MQGED MVM N2Q NB0 NDZJH NHB NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O-F O-J O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OHT OVD P19 P2P P9L PF- PQEDU PQQKQ PRG PROAC PSYQQ PT4 PT5 Q2X Q5E QF4 QII QM7 QN7 QO5 QOK QOS QXPDG R-Y R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RSV RZC RZD RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S3B SAP SBS SBU SCLPG SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SZN T13 T16 TAE TEORI TN5 TSG TSK TSV TUC TWZ U2A U9L UBC UG4 UHB UKHRP UKR UMD UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW VQA VXZ W23 W48 WH7 WIP WK6 WK8 XJT XOL XSW XZL YCJ YIN YLTOR YR2 YZZ Z45 Z83 Z92 ZCA ZCG ZGI ZHY ZMTXR ZMU ZOVNA ~A9 ~EX ~P2 ~P3 ~PJ ~PN AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC ADHKG ADXHL AETEA AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PMKZF PVKVW ABRTQ NPM PMFND POGQB PRQQA 7U4 7XB 8FK BHHNA DWI MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQGEN PQUKI PRINS Q9U WZK 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-3aef1bef30405394f25a9b4594fb420e76bc8c9bd7c38b70553557bcba7cbc1f3 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0360-0025 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:42:18 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 23:04:11 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 14:24:14 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:59:29 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:25:21 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:43 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:34:56 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3-4 |
Keywords | Masculinity Femininity Gender equality Education policy Gender Physics STEM |
Language | English |
License | Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c470t-3aef1bef30405394f25a9b4594fb420e76bc8c9bd7c38b70553557bcba7cbc1f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-3930-6798 |
OpenAccessLink | https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z |
PMID | 28133410 |
PQID | 1858392989 |
PQPubID | 48257 |
PageCount | 19 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5237440 proquest_miscellaneous_1862939899 proquest_journals_1858392989 pubmed_primary_28133410 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_016_0669_z crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11199_016_0669_z springer_journals_10_1007_s11199_016_0669_z |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2017 text: 2017-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | New York |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States |
PublicationSubtitle | A Journal of Research |
PublicationTitle | Sex roles |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Sex Roles |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Sex Roles |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | Questions for Governors. (2014a). What proportion of students choose to continue each of the sciences (physics, chemistry and biology) and maths at A level? Retrieved from http://www.questionsforgovernors.co.uk/choices/what-proportion-of-students-chooses-to-continue-each-of-the-sciences-physics-chemistry-and-biology-and-maths-at-a-level/. CheryanSSiyJVichayapaiMDruryBKimSDo female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social Psychological and Personality Science2011265666410.1177/1948550611405218 Lowell, B. L., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009, November 7). Steady as she goes? Three generations of students through the science and engineering pipeline. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC. Spears BrownCLeaperCLatina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescenceSex Roles20106386087010.1007/s11199-010-9856-5 FarengaSJJoyceBAIntentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differencesScience Education199983557510.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016a). The “exceptional” physics/ engineering girl: A sociological analysis of longitudinal data from girls aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. Manuscript submitted for publication. CaleonISSubramaniamRAttitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in SingaporeJournal of Research in Science Teaching20084594095410.1002/tea.20250 DaviesBShards of glass. Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities1993SydneyAllen & Unwin OsborneJArguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourseScience201032846346610.1126/science.118394420413492 FrancisBRe/theorising gender: Female masculinity and male femininity in the classroom?Gender and Education20102247749010.1080/09540250903341146 VolmanMTen DamGEqual but different: Contradictions in the development of gender identityBritish Journal of Sociology of Education19981952954510.1080/0142569980190405 BoalerJSengupta-IrvingTSkeltonCFrancisBSmulyanLNature, neglect and nuance: Changing accounts of sex, gender and mathematicsThe Sage handbook of gender and education2006LondonSage20722010.4135/9781848607996.n16 BakhtinMThe dialogic imagination: Four essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.).1981AustinUniversity of Texas Press HeyVThe contrasting social logics of sociality and survival: Cultures of classed be/longing in late modernitySociology20053985587210.1177/0038038505058369 WongBIdentifying with science: A case of two 13-year-old ‘high achieving working class’ British Asian girlsInternational Journal of Science Education201234436510.1080/09500693.2010.551671 CheryanSDruryBVichayapaiMEnduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirationsPsychology of Women Quarterly201337727910.1177/0361684312459328 Franics, B. (2002). Is the future really female? The impact and implications of gender for 14-16 year olds’ career choices, British Journal of Education and Work, 15(1), 75–88. www.tandf.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13639080120106730. FrancisBThe gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject abilityOxford Review of Education200026354810.1080/030549800103845 HutchinsonJBentleyKSTEM subjects and jobs: A longitudinal perspective of attitudes among key stage 3 students, 2008–20102011DerbyInternational Centre for Guidance Studies, University of Derby LewisJLMenziesHNájeraEIPageRNRethinking trends in minority participation in the sciencesScience Education20099396197710.1002/sce.20338 SeymourEHewittNMTalking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences1997Boulder, COWestview SmithEIs there a crisis in school science education in the UK?Educational Review20106218920210.1080/00131911003637014 Council of Canadian Academies.Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity2015OttowaCouncil of Canadian Academies HardingSWhose science? Whose knowledge?1991BuckinghamOpen University Press CarloneHB(Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physicsJournal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering20039173410.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20 RoseNPowers of freedom: Reframing political thought1999Cambridge, MACambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511488856 Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York & London: Routledge. DaviesBFrogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender1989SydneyAllen & Unwin WalkerdineVSchoolgirl fictions1990LondonVerso FrancisBGender monoglossia, gender heteroglossia: The potential of Bakhtin’s work for re-conceptualising genderJournal of Gender Studies20122111510.1080/09589236.2012.639174 XieYKillewaldAIs American science in decline?2012Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press10.4159/harvard.9780674065048 Questions for Governors. (2014b). What proportion of students choosing each of physics, chemistry, biology and maths A levels are female? Retrieved from http://www.questionsforgovernors.co.uk/secondary/science-and-maths/choices/what-proportion-students-female/. ProninESteeleCRossLIdentity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematicsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology20044015216810.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X BurmanEParkerIDiscourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action1993LondonRoutledge HardingSTaking responsibility for our own gender, race, class: Transforming science and the social studies of scienceRethinking Marxism1989281910.1080/08935698908657865 FoucaultMPower/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–19771980New York, NYPantheon FraserNNicholsonLFeminism/postmodernism1990LondonRoutledge Campaign for Science and Engineering.Improving diversity in STEM2014LondonAuthor House of LordsHigher education in science, technology, engineering and mathematic subjects2012LondonThe Stationery Office Limited GorardSSeeBHThe impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in scienceStudies in Science Education2009459312910.1080/03057260802681821 American Association of University WomenWhy so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics2010Washington, DCAuthor FrancisBBurkePReadBThe submergence and re-emergence of gender in undergraduate accounts of university experienceGender & Education20132611710.1080/09540253.2013.860433 LandivarLCDisparities in the STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin: American Community Survey Reports2013Washington, DCUS Census Bureau Confederation of British Industry.Learning to grow: What employers need from education and skills. Education and skills survey 20122012LondonAuthor Danish EU Presidency. (2012, May). Danish EU Presidency, International roundtable on gender and social mobility. Roundtable conducted in Copenhagen, Denmark U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. (2015). Reaching the full potential of STEM for women and the U.S economy. Retrieved from https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/reaching-full-potential-stem-women-and-us-economy . HardingSIs gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? A survey of issuesDialectica198236436310.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb00818.x SmithEDo we need more scientists? A long-term view of patterns of participation in UK undergraduate science programmesCambridge Journal of Education20104028129810.1080/0305764X.2010.502886 ArcherLDeWittJOsborneJIs science for us? Black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careersScience Education20159919923710.1002/sce.21146 Equal Opportunities Commission. (2006). Facts about men and women in Great Britain 2006. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/gender/publications/UK/ Facts_about_W&M_GB_2006.pdf. FennemaEPetersonPLAutonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of sex-related differences in mathematicsEducational Studies in Mathematics19851630931110.1007/BF00776738 ReissMHoylesCMujtabaTRiazi-FarzadBRodd.MSimonSStylianidouFUnderstanding participation rates in post-16 mathematics and physics: Conceptualising and operationalising the UPMAP projectInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education2011927330210.1007/s10763-011-9286-z GreenwoodCHarrisonMVignolesAThe labour market value of STEM qualifications and occupations2011LondonRoyal Academy of Engineering WalkerdineVCounting girls out1989LondonVirago Calabrese BartonATanEFunds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid spaceJournal of Research in Science Teaching200946507310.1002/tea.20269 SmithEGorardSIs there a shortage of scientists? A re-analysis of supply for the UKBritish Journal of Educational Studies20115915917710.1080/00071005.2011.578567 FrancisBAn investigation of the discourses children draw on in their constructions of genderJournal of Applied Social Psychology19992930031610.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01388.x WalkerdineVThe mastery of reason1988CambridgeRoutledge & Kegan Paul Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016b). Stratifying science: A Bourdieusian analysis of student views and experiences of school selective practices in relation to “Triple Science” at KS4 in England. Research Papers in Education. EliasPJonesPMcWhinnieSRepresentation of ethnic groups in chemistry and physics: A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Institute of Physics2006LondonRoyal Society of Chemistry/Institute of Physics BaumanZWork, consumerism and the new poor2005Buckingham, UKOpen University Press MendickHMathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS level in England?British Journal of Sociology of Education20052623525110.1080/0142569042000294192 Royal Academy of EngineeringJobs and growth: The importance of engineering skills to the UK economy2012LondonRoyal A 669_CR81 J Tripney (669_CR80) 2010 S Cheryan (669_CR20) 2011; 2 E Fennema (669_CR32) 1985; 16 V Walkerdine (669_CR85) 1989 E Pronin (669_CR65) 2004; 40 IS Caleon (669_CR17) 2008; 45 Campaign for Science and Engineering. (669_CR18) 2014 B Francis (669_CR38) 2012; 21 B Wong (669_CR87) 2012; 34 SJ Farenga (669_CR31) 1999; 83 B Davies (669_CR26) 1989 V Hey (669_CR50) 2005; 39 Institute of Mechanical Engineers (669_CR53) 2010 E Smith (669_CR76) 2011; 59 B Davies (669_CR27) 1993 S Gorard (669_CR44) 2009; 45 V Walkerdine (669_CR86) 1990 669_CR42 E Burman (669_CR14) 1993 L Archer (669_CR2) 2014 M Foucault (669_CR33) 1980 S Harding (669_CR48) 1991 LC Landivar (669_CR55) 2013 S Harding (669_CR46) 1982; 36 A Calabrese Barton (669_CR16) 2009; 46 AT Danielsson (669_CR24) 2012; 24 E Smith (669_CR74) 2010; 62 B Francis (669_CR35) 2000; 26 E Smith (669_CR75) 2011; 37 Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA). (669_CR7) 2013 M Volman (669_CR83) 1998; 19 B Francis (669_CR34) 1999; 29 M Bakhtin (669_CR8) 1981 S Cheryan (669_CR21) 2013; 37 669_CR36 669_CR30 T Mujtaba (669_CR60) 2013; 35 E Seymour (669_CR72) 1997 HM Treasury (669_CR79) 2011 Institute of Physics (669_CR54) 2012 CMA Haworth (669_CR49) 2008; 30 H Mendick (669_CR59) 2005; 26 J Boaler (669_CR11) 2006 JL Lewis (669_CR57) 2009; 93 J Hutchinson (669_CR52) 2011 U.S. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (669_CR82) 2010 I Balbus (669_CR9) 1987 B Francis (669_CR37) 2010; 22 E Smith (669_CR73) 2010; 40 A Gonsalves (669_CR43) 2014; 9 C Greenwood (669_CR45) 2011 HB Carlone (669_CR19) 2003; 9 (669_CR41) 1990 American Association of University Women (669_CR1) 2010 N Rose (669_CR69) 1999 669_CR25 L Archer (669_CR3) 2012; 49 669_CR67 B Francis (669_CR40) 2013; 26 Council of Canadian Academies. (669_CR23) 2015 669_CR66 J Perkins (669_CR64) 2013 M Brown (669_CR13) 2008; 26 S Harding (669_CR47) 1989; 2 L Orthia (669_CR62) 2016; 75 B Francis (669_CR39) 2003; 24 669_CR6 Y Xie (669_CR88) 2012 669_CR5 M Ong (669_CR61) 2005; 52 S Strand (669_CR78) 2012; 38 M Reiss (669_CR68) 2011; 9 L Archer (669_CR4) 2015; 99 Z Bauman (669_CR10) 2005 Confederation of British Industry. (669_CR22) 2012 P Bourdieu (669_CR12) 1984 Royal Society (669_CR71) 2008 House of Lords (669_CR51) 2012 J Osborne (669_CR63) 2010; 328 Royal Academy of Engineering (669_CR70) 2012 669_CR58 669_CR15 669_CR56 P Elias (669_CR29) 2006 C Spears Brown (669_CR77) 2010; 63 AB Diekman (669_CR28) 2011; 101 V Walkerdine (669_CR84) 1988 |
References_xml | – reference: DaviesBShards of glass. Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities1993SydneyAllen & Unwin – reference: American Association of University WomenWhy so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics2010Washington, DCAuthor – reference: ArcherLDeWittJOsborneJIs science for us? Black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careersScience Education20159919923710.1002/sce.21146 – reference: FrancisBBurkePReadBThe submergence and re-emergence of gender in undergraduate accounts of university experienceGender & Education20132611710.1080/09540253.2013.860433 – reference: DaviesBFrogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender1989SydneyAllen & Unwin – reference: FraserNNicholsonLFeminism/postmodernism1990LondonRoutledge – reference: BrownMBrownPBibbyT“I would rather die”: Reasons given by 16-year-olds for not continuing their study of mathematicsResearch in Mathematics Education200826631648 – reference: Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016a). The “exceptional” physics/ engineering girl: A sociological analysis of longitudinal data from girls aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. Manuscript submitted for publication. – reference: CaleonISSubramaniamRAttitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in SingaporeJournal of Research in Science Teaching20084594095410.1002/tea.20250 – reference: FarengaSJJoyceBAIntentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differencesScience Education199983557510.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O – reference: EliasPJonesPMcWhinnieSRepresentation of ethnic groups in chemistry and physics: A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Institute of Physics2006LondonRoyal Society of Chemistry/Institute of Physics – reference: TripneyJNewmanMBangpanMNizaCMackintoshMSinclairJSubject choice in STEM: Factors influencing young people (aged 14–19) in education about STEM subject choices: A systematic review of the UK literature.2010LondonEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI). – reference: LewisJLMenziesHNájeraEIPageRNRethinking trends in minority participation in the sciencesScience Education20099396197710.1002/sce.20338 – reference: Royal Academy of EngineeringJobs and growth: The importance of engineering skills to the UK economy2012LondonRoyal Academy of Engineering – reference: BakhtinMThe dialogic imagination: Four essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.).1981AustinUniversity of Texas Press – reference: FrancisBGender monoglossia, gender heteroglossia: The potential of Bakhtin’s work for re-conceptualising genderJournal of Gender Studies20122111510.1080/09589236.2012.639174 – reference: BaumanZWork, consumerism and the new poor2005Buckingham, UKOpen University Press – reference: Calabrese BartonATanEFunds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid spaceJournal of Research in Science Teaching200946507310.1002/tea.20269 – reference: SmithEGorardSIs there a shortage of scientists? A re-analysis of supply for the UKBritish Journal of Educational Studies20115915917710.1080/00071005.2011.578567 – reference: BalbusIBenhabibSCornellDDisciplining women: Michel Foucault and the power of feminist discourseFeminism as critique1987Minneapolis, MNUniversity of Minnesota Press110127 – reference: DiekmanABClarkEKJohnstonAMBrownERSteinbergMMalleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspectiveJournal of Personality and Social Psychology201110190291810.1037/a002519921859224 – reference: WalkerdineVThe mastery of reason1988CambridgeRoutledge & Kegan Paul – reference: Lowell, B. L., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009, November 7). Steady as she goes? Three generations of students through the science and engineering pipeline. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC. – reference: GonsalvesA“Physics and the girly girl—there is a contradiction somewhere”: Doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physicsCultural Studies in Science Education2014950352110.1007/s11422-012-9447-6 – reference: Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA).STEM country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education2013Melbourne, AustraliaACOLA – reference: TreasuryHMThe plan for growth2011LondonBIS – reference: BoalerJSengupta-IrvingTSkeltonCFrancisBSmulyanLNature, neglect and nuance: Changing accounts of sex, gender and mathematicsThe Sage handbook of gender and education2006LondonSage20722010.4135/9781848607996.n16 – reference: VolmanMTen DamGEqual but different: Contradictions in the development of gender identityBritish Journal of Sociology of Education19981952954510.1080/0142569980190405 – reference: OrthiaLMorgainRThe gendered culture of scientific competence: A study of scientist characters in Doctor Who 1963–2013Sex Roles201675799410.1007/s11199-016-0597-y – reference: GorardSSeeBHThe impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in scienceStudies in Science Education2009459312910.1080/03057260802681821 – reference: LandivarLCDisparities in the STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin: American Community Survey Reports2013Washington, DCUS Census Bureau – reference: SmithEWomen into science and engineering? Gendered participation in higher education STEM subjectsBritish Educational Research Journal201137993101410.1080/01411926.2010.515019 – reference: WongBIdentifying with science: A case of two 13-year-old ‘high achieving working class’ British Asian girlsInternational Journal of Science Education201234436510.1080/09500693.2010.551671 – reference: Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2016b). Stratifying science: A Bourdieusian analysis of student views and experiences of school selective practices in relation to “Triple Science” at KS4 in England. Research Papers in Education. – reference: BourdieuPDistinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste1984Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press – reference: FrancisBReadBMellingLRobsonJUniversity lecturers’ perceptions of gender and undergraduate writingBritish Journal of Sociology of Education20032435737310.1080/01425690301891 – reference: Campaign for Science and Engineering.Improving diversity in STEM2014LondonAuthor – reference: CheryanSSiyJVichayapaiMDruryBKimSDo female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social Psychological and Personality Science2011265666410.1177/1948550611405218 – reference: Gibb, N. (2015, June 11). The social justice case for an academic curriculum. Speech presented at the Policy Exchange, London, UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-the-social-justice-case-for-an-academic-curriculum . – reference: HardingSTaking responsibility for our own gender, race, class: Transforming science and the social studies of scienceRethinking Marxism1989281910.1080/08935698908657865 – reference: FrancisBThe gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject abilityOxford Review of Education200026354810.1080/030549800103845 – reference: Franics, B. (2002). Is the future really female? The impact and implications of gender for 14-16 year olds’ career choices, British Journal of Education and Work, 15(1), 75–88. www.tandf.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13639080120106730. – reference: HaworthCMADalePPlominRA twin study into the genetic and environmental influences on academic performance in science in nine-year-old boys and girlsInternational Journal of Science Education2008301003102510.1080/09500690701324190201116702811965 – reference: PerkinsJProfessor John Perkins’ review of engineering skills2013LondonBIS – reference: WalkerdineVSchoolgirl fictions1990LondonVerso – reference: Institute of Mechanical EngineersWhen STEM? A question of age2010LondonInstitution of Mechanical Engineers – reference: SmithEIs there a crisis in school science education in the UK?Educational Review20106218920210.1080/00131911003637014 – reference: House of LordsHigher education in science, technology, engineering and mathematic subjects2012LondonThe Stationery Office Limited – reference: Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York & London: Routledge. – reference: OsborneJArguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourseScience201032846346610.1126/science.118394420413492 – reference: SeymourEHewittNMTalking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences1997Boulder, COWestview – reference: WalkerdineVCounting girls out1989LondonVirago – reference: U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. (2015). Reaching the full potential of STEM for women and the U.S economy. Retrieved from https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/reaching-full-potential-stem-women-and-us-economy . – reference: U.S. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.Report to the President and Congress: Designing a digital future: Federally funded research and development in networking and information technology2010Washington, DCExecutive Office to the President of the United States – reference: Equal Opportunities Commission. (2006). Facts about men and women in Great Britain 2006. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/gender/publications/UK/ Facts_about_W&M_GB_2006.pdf. – reference: ArcherLDeWittJHenriksenEKDillonJRyderJScience aspirations and gender identity: Lessons from the ASPIRES ProjectUnderstanding student participation and choice in science technology and education2014DordrechtSpringer89102 – reference: CarloneHB(Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physicsJournal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering20039173410.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20 – reference: OngMBody projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race and scienceSocial Problems20055259361710.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593 – reference: Royal SocietyScience and mathematics education, 14–19: A ‘state of nation’ report on the participation and attainment of 14–19 year olds in science and mathematics in the UK, 1996–20072008LondonRoyal Society – reference: SmithEDo we need more scientists? A long-term view of patterns of participation in UK undergraduate science programmesCambridge Journal of Education20104028129810.1080/0305764X.2010.502886 – reference: StrandSThe White British-Black Caribbean achievement gap: Tests, tiers and teacher expectationsBritish Educational Research Journal2012387510110.1080/01411926.2010.526702 – reference: BurmanEParkerIDiscourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action1993LondonRoutledge – reference: DanielssonATExploring woman university physics students ‘doing gender’ and ‘doing physics’Gender and Education201224253910.1080/09540253.2011.565040 – reference: HeyVThe contrasting social logics of sociality and survival: Cultures of classed be/longing in late modernitySociology20053985587210.1177/0038038505058369 – reference: Danish EU Presidency. (2012, May). Danish EU Presidency, International roundtable on gender and social mobility. Roundtable conducted in Copenhagen, Denmark – reference: Spears BrownCLeaperCLatina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescenceSex Roles20106386087010.1007/s11199-010-9856-5 – reference: FrancisBAn investigation of the discourses children draw on in their constructions of genderJournal of Applied Social Psychology19992930031610.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01388.x – reference: HardingSIs gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? A survey of issuesDialectica198236436310.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb00818.x – reference: HardingSWhose science? Whose knowledge?1991BuckinghamOpen University Press – reference: HutchinsonJBentleyKSTEM subjects and jobs: A longitudinal perspective of attitudes among key stage 3 students, 2008–20102011DerbyInternational Centre for Guidance Studies, University of Derby – reference: XieYKillewaldAIs American science in decline?2012Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press10.4159/harvard.9780674065048 – reference: RoseNPowers of freedom: Reframing political thought1999Cambridge, MACambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511488856 – reference: ArcherLDeWittJOsborneJDillonJWillisBWongBScience aspirations and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with scienceAmerican Education Research Journal20124988190810.3102/0002831211433290 – reference: ProninESteeleCRossLIdentity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematicsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology20044015216810.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X – reference: FrancisBRe/theorising gender: Female masculinity and male femininity in the classroom?Gender and Education20102247749010.1080/09540250903341146 – reference: Institute of PhysicsIt’s different for girls: The influence of schools – An exploration of data from the National Pupil Database looking at progression to A-level physics in 2011 from different types of school at Key Stage 42012LondonInstitute of Physics – reference: Confederation of British Industry.Learning to grow: What employers need from education and skills. Education and skills survey 20122012LondonAuthor – reference: MujtabaTReissMJWhat sort of girl wants to study physics after the age of 16? Findings from a large-scale UK surveyInternational Journal of Science Education2013352979299810.1080/09500693.2012.681076 – reference: FoucaultMPower/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–19771980New York, NYPantheon – reference: FennemaEPetersonPLAutonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of sex-related differences in mathematicsEducational Studies in Mathematics19851630931110.1007/BF00776738 – reference: Questions for Governors. (2014a). What proportion of students choose to continue each of the sciences (physics, chemistry and biology) and maths at A level? Retrieved from http://www.questionsforgovernors.co.uk/choices/what-proportion-of-students-chooses-to-continue-each-of-the-sciences-physics-chemistry-and-biology-and-maths-at-a-level/. – reference: CheryanSDruryBVichayapaiMEnduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirationsPsychology of Women Quarterly201337727910.1177/0361684312459328 – reference: Council of Canadian Academies.Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity2015OttowaCouncil of Canadian Academies – reference: Larson, R. C. (2014). STEM is for everyone. World Innovation Summit for Education Opinions. Retrieved from http://www.wise-qatar.org/content/dr-larson-stem-everyone. – reference: Questions for Governors. (2014b). What proportion of students choosing each of physics, chemistry, biology and maths A levels are female? Retrieved from http://www.questionsforgovernors.co.uk/secondary/science-and-maths/choices/what-proportion-students-female/. – reference: GreenwoodCHarrisonMVignolesAThe labour market value of STEM qualifications and occupations2011LondonRoyal Academy of Engineering – reference: ReissMHoylesCMujtabaTRiazi-FarzadBRodd.MSimonSStylianidouFUnderstanding participation rates in post-16 mathematics and physics: Conceptualising and operationalising the UPMAP projectInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education2011927330210.1007/s10763-011-9286-z – reference: MendickHMathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS level in England?British Journal of Sociology of Education20052623525110.1080/0142569042000294192 – volume-title: Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity year: 2015 ident: 669_CR23 – volume: 29 start-page: 300 year: 1999 ident: 669_CR34 publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01388.x – volume: 9 start-page: 503 year: 2014 ident: 669_CR43 publication-title: Cultural Studies in Science Education doi: 10.1007/s11422-012-9447-6 – volume-title: The labour market value of STEM qualifications and occupations year: 2011 ident: 669_CR45 – volume-title: Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 year: 1980 ident: 669_CR33 – volume: 40 start-page: 281 year: 2010 ident: 669_CR73 publication-title: Cambridge Journal of Education doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2010.502886 – volume: 34 start-page: 43 year: 2012 ident: 669_CR87 publication-title: International Journal of Science Education doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.551671 – ident: 669_CR66 – start-page: 207 volume-title: The Sage handbook of gender and education year: 2006 ident: 669_CR11 doi: 10.4135/9781848607996.n16 – volume: 328 start-page: 463 year: 2010 ident: 669_CR63 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1183944 – volume: 75 start-page: 79 year: 2016 ident: 669_CR62 publication-title: Sex Roles doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0597-y – volume: 21 start-page: 1 year: 2012 ident: 669_CR38 publication-title: Journal of Gender Studies doi: 10.1080/09589236.2012.639174 – volume-title: Whose science? Whose knowledge? year: 1991 ident: 669_CR48 – volume-title: Learning to grow: What employers need from education and skills. Education and skills survey 2012 year: 2012 ident: 669_CR22 – ident: 669_CR56 – ident: 669_CR81 – volume-title: Jobs and growth: The importance of engineering skills to the UK economy year: 2012 ident: 669_CR70 – volume: 36 start-page: 43 year: 1982 ident: 669_CR46 publication-title: Dialectica doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb00818.x – volume-title: Report to the President and Congress: Designing a digital future: Federally funded research and development in networking and information technology year: 2010 ident: 669_CR82 – volume: 39 start-page: 855 year: 2005 ident: 669_CR50 publication-title: Sociology doi: 10.1177/0038038505058369 – volume-title: Higher education in science, technology, engineering and mathematic subjects year: 2012 ident: 669_CR51 – volume: 49 start-page: 881 year: 2012 ident: 669_CR3 publication-title: American Education Research Journal doi: 10.3102/0002831211433290 – volume-title: Disparities in the STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin: American Community Survey Reports year: 2013 ident: 669_CR55 – volume: 63 start-page: 860 year: 2010 ident: 669_CR77 publication-title: Sex Roles doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5 – volume: 62 start-page: 189 year: 2010 ident: 669_CR74 publication-title: Educational Review doi: 10.1080/00131911003637014 – volume-title: Shards of glass. Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities year: 1993 ident: 669_CR27 – volume: 93 start-page: 961 year: 2009 ident: 669_CR57 publication-title: Science Education doi: 10.1002/sce.20338 – volume: 40 start-page: 152 year: 2004 ident: 669_CR65 publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X – volume: 59 start-page: 159 year: 2011 ident: 669_CR76 publication-title: British Journal of Educational Studies doi: 10.1080/00071005.2011.578567 – volume: 16 start-page: 309 year: 1985 ident: 669_CR32 publication-title: Educational Studies in Mathematics doi: 10.1007/BF00776738 – volume: 37 start-page: 72 year: 2013 ident: 669_CR21 publication-title: Psychology of Women Quarterly doi: 10.1177/0361684312459328 – volume: 83 start-page: 55 year: 1999 ident: 669_CR31 publication-title: Science Education doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O – volume-title: Representation of ethnic groups in chemistry and physics: A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Institute of Physics year: 2006 ident: 669_CR29 – volume: 35 start-page: 2979 year: 2013 ident: 669_CR60 publication-title: International Journal of Science Education doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.681076 – volume-title: Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action year: 1993 ident: 669_CR14 – volume: 101 start-page: 902 year: 2011 ident: 669_CR28 publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/a0025199 – volume-title: Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste year: 1984 ident: 669_CR12 – volume-title: Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought year: 1999 ident: 669_CR69 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511488856 – ident: 669_CR30 – volume: 26 start-page: 235251 year: 2005 ident: 669_CR59 publication-title: British Journal of Sociology of Education doi: 10.1080/0142569042000294192 – ident: 669_CR6 doi: 10.1080/02671522.2016.1219382 – volume-title: Feminism/postmodernism year: 1990 ident: 669_CR41 – volume: 45 start-page: 93 year: 2009 ident: 669_CR44 publication-title: Studies in Science Education doi: 10.1080/03057260802681821 – volume: 99 start-page: 199 year: 2015 ident: 669_CR4 publication-title: Science Education doi: 10.1002/sce.21146 – ident: 669_CR36 doi: 10.1080/13639080120106730 – ident: 669_CR5 – volume: 45 start-page: 940 year: 2008 ident: 669_CR17 publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching doi: 10.1002/tea.20250/ – volume-title: Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender year: 1989 ident: 669_CR26 – volume-title: The mastery of reason year: 1988 ident: 669_CR84 – volume-title: Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences year: 1997 ident: 669_CR72 – volume-title: The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). year: 1981 ident: 669_CR8 – start-page: 110 volume-title: Feminism as critique year: 1987 ident: 669_CR9 – volume: 9 start-page: 273 year: 2011 ident: 669_CR68 publication-title: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education doi: 10.1007/s10763-011-9286-z – volume-title: Science and mathematics education, 14–19: A ‘state of nation’ report on the participation and attainment of 14–19 year olds in science and mathematics in the UK, 1996–2007 year: 2008 ident: 669_CR71 – volume: 2 start-page: 656 year: 2011 ident: 669_CR20 publication-title: Social Psychological and Personality Science doi: 10.1177/1948550611405218 – ident: 669_CR58 – volume: 26 start-page: 631 year: 2008 ident: 669_CR13 publication-title: Research in Mathematics Education doi: 10.1080/14794800801915814 – volume-title: Improving diversity in STEM year: 2014 ident: 669_CR18 – volume-title: It’s different for girls: The influence of schools – An exploration of data from the National Pupil Database looking at progression to A-level physics in 2011 from different types of school at Key Stage 4 year: 2012 ident: 669_CR54 – start-page: 89 volume-title: Understanding student participation and choice in science technology and education year: 2014 ident: 669_CR2 – volume-title: Counting girls out year: 1989 ident: 669_CR85 – volume: 37 start-page: 993 year: 2011 ident: 669_CR75 publication-title: British Educational Research Journal doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.515019 – volume: 26 start-page: 1 year: 2013 ident: 669_CR40 publication-title: Gender & Education doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.860433 – volume-title: Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics year: 2010 ident: 669_CR1 – volume: 26 start-page: 35 year: 2000 ident: 669_CR35 publication-title: Oxford Review of Education doi: 10.1080/030549800103845 – volume-title: The plan for growth year: 2011 ident: 669_CR79 – volume-title: Subject choice in STEM: Factors influencing young people (aged 14–19) in education about STEM subject choices: A systematic review of the UK literature. year: 2010 ident: 669_CR80 – volume: 24 start-page: 25 year: 2012 ident: 669_CR24 publication-title: Gender and Education doi: 10.1080/09540253.2011.565040 – volume: 9 start-page: 17 year: 2003 ident: 669_CR19 publication-title: Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20 – volume-title: STEM subjects and jobs: A longitudinal perspective of attitudes among key stage 3 students, 2008–2010 year: 2011 ident: 669_CR52 – ident: 669_CR67 – volume-title: When STEM? A question of age year: 2010 ident: 669_CR53 – volume: 2 start-page: 8 year: 1989 ident: 669_CR47 publication-title: Rethinking Marxism doi: 10.1080/08935698908657865 – volume-title: Is American science in decline? year: 2012 ident: 669_CR88 doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674065048 – ident: 669_CR25 – ident: 669_CR42 – volume: 22 start-page: 477 year: 2010 ident: 669_CR37 publication-title: Gender and Education doi: 10.1080/09540250903341146 – volume: 19 start-page: 529 year: 1998 ident: 669_CR83 publication-title: British Journal of Sociology of Education doi: 10.1080/0142569980190405 – volume: 52 start-page: 593 year: 2005 ident: 669_CR61 publication-title: Social Problems doi: 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.593 – volume: 38 start-page: 75 year: 2012 ident: 669_CR78 publication-title: British Educational Research Journal doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.526702 – volume: 46 start-page: 50 year: 2009 ident: 669_CR16 publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching doi: 10.1002/tea.20269 – ident: 669_CR15 – volume: 24 start-page: 357 year: 2003 ident: 669_CR39 publication-title: British Journal of Sociology of Education doi: 10.1080/01425690301891 – volume-title: Professor John Perkins’ review of engineering skills year: 2013 ident: 669_CR64 – volume-title: Work, consumerism and the new poor year: 2005 ident: 669_CR10 – volume-title: STEM country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education year: 2013 ident: 669_CR7 – volume: 30 start-page: 1003 year: 2008 ident: 669_CR49 publication-title: International Journal of Science Education doi: 10.1080/09500690701324190 – volume-title: Schoolgirl fictions year: 1990 ident: 669_CR86 |
SSID | ssj0001004 |
Score | 2.4716704 |
Snippet | The present article investigates explanations for gendered trends in Physics and Engineering access, reporting findings from a large-scale study funded by the... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 156 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescents Behavioral Science and Psychology Careers Citizen Participation Compulsory Education Cultural Capital Data collection Discourse analysis Discrimination Education policy Educational Policy Engineering Equality Ethnicity Females Gender Discrimination Gender equity Gender Issues Gender Studies Individualized Instruction Masculinity Mathematics Activities Medicine/Public Health Narratives Original Original Article Parents & parenting Physical sciences Physics Politics of Education Psychology Science education Scientific Literacy Sex Fairness Sexes Sexism Social Class Social Status Sociology STEM Education White Students Working women Young Adults Youth |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) dbid: U2A link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Pa9VAEB-0Xnop-vwXfZYRREEJJJvNJuvtIZYiVBR82FvIbjZY-kikeT20J29-hn69fhJnNn_aZ1UQcgjJZJMws5PfZmZ-A_BCqqqqtBKhKTMdSlPLUFtBC1ejnS3JxKTjAueDj2p_KT8cpodDHXc3ZruPIUnvqa-K3eKYK-ZjxVXzOjy_DXdSXrqTES_FYnK_TIHWByi5ZFqkYyjzT0NsfoxuIMybiZK_RUv9R2jvLuwM6BEXvbrvwS3XzGB7cmJnM5j39bb41a3q8sThSxwPtCfHM9jxHStfdTjkD96Hn2QoyG07RyJZbGv0eaG2w5I2_HzKnBIdVynRQKszPPDZqwRPkdwO_8d5i95p4Cefjn7546Kj3SlhhgfsO9Zh3-sPjxpc-EaNuG7Hez2A5d77L-_2w6E7Q2hlFq3DpHR1bFydkBtIEy1rkZbayJT2jBSRy5SxudWmymySGybtIWiTGUtGYY2N6-QhbDVt4x4DyqqKnErquGQ4FJlcMYGEqpwwWotcBRCNairsQF3OHTRWxRXpMmu24HQ11mxxHsDr6ZLvPW_Hv4Tno-6LYQp3BQEZDx5zHcDz6TRNPo6olI1rT1lGEVwiEZJ51JvKdDeR0_JfxlEA2YYRTQJM7L15pjn65gm-U5Ewb2MAb0Zzu_ZYf3uJJ_8l_RS2BQMUn38-hy2yMfeM4NXa7Prp9AtnsCBs priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | The Construction of Physics as a Quintessentially Masculine Subject: Young People’s Perceptions of Gender Issues in Access to Physics |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28133410 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1858392989 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1862939899 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5237440 |
Volume | 76 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9RAEB9sD6F9KHp-Rc9jBVFQgskm2WR9kfO4WpSWUzysTyG72WDpkdTm-tC--387s_m4nsVCCCGZbBJ2dnay85vfALwMRZ7nUnBXZbF0Q1WErtQcf1yVNDpDFQsNJTgfHomDRfj5ODpuF9zqFlbZ2URrqPNK0xr5O5xX7FyeyA9nv12qGkXR1baExhYM0AQn-PM1-Dg7mn_rbTHxoTXRSsqf5lEX17TJc75PGfi-oCx86V5tzkw33M2bqMl_Qqd2Rtq_B3utK8kmTd_fhzumHMLuNYLBIdy1AE9dD2Gnt3SXQxg1Sbnsh1kW2blhr1h3ojo_HcKeLWv5umYtyPAB_EFtYlTbs2ObZVXB2rZZhhv7ekHEEzWlMmFDy0t2aCGu-CoMbRMt9rxn1rKwucWsY-vzNaaGmmuK2rGmHCA7KdnE1nJkq6p70kNY7M--Tw_ctoCDq8PYW7lBZgpfmSJASxEFMix4lEkVRnikQu6ZWCidaKnyWAeJIl4f9H5ipVFvtNJ-ETyC7bIqzRNgYZ57RgSFn5HH5KlEEMeEyA1XUvJEOOB1nZfqlt2cimws0zUvM_V3Sog26u_0yoE3_S1nDbXHbcKjTiPSdpTX6VonHXjRX8bxSUGXrDTVBckI9KhQBGUeNwrUP40nfoBehOdAvKFavQBxf29eKU9-WQ7wiAdE7ejA204Jr73W_z7i6e0f8Qx2ODktFpM-gm1UKfMcXa6VGsNg8unnl9m4HV9j2JqKKe4XfPIX6est3w |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9NADLdGJ8R4mKB8BQocEh8SKCK5XJMcEkIDNnVsrQraxN5C7nIRE1Uy1k6oe-ff4W_Evnx0ZWJvk_pQNa6Tk322L7Z_BngqwizLZMhdlUbSFSoXrtQcD65KGp2iiglDDc7DUTjYF58O-gcr8KfphaGyysYmWkOdlZrekb9Gv2J9eSzfHf10aWoUZVebERqVWuyY-S88sk3fbn9E-T7jfGtz78PAracKuFpE3swNUpP7yuR4jkcFlCLn_VQq0cdvSnDPRKHSsZYqi3QQKwKbQZccKY2L0Ur7eYB8r8CqCPAo04HV95uj8ZfW9hP-WpUdpX5t3m_yqLZZz_ep498PqetfuqfLnvBceHu-SvOfVK31gFs3YL0OXdlGpWs3YcUUXbh-BtCwC1dtQamedmGttazzLvSqJmD21Uzy9Niw56z5oTz-0YV1O0bzxZTVRY234DdqL6NZog26LStzVvNmKX7Y5xMCuphS6xQymszZ0JbU4qMwtIX0cukNs5aMjW2NPHIfL2p4iF01RI9V4wfZYcE27OxINiubO92G_UsR7R3oFGVh7gETWeaZMMj9lCI0T8UhYVqEmeFKSh6HDniN8BJdo6nTUI9JssCBJnknVEFH8k5OHXjZ_uWoghK5iLjXaERSW5VpstgDDjxpL6M9oCRPWpjyhGhCjOCQBGnuVgrU3o3HfoBRi-dAtKRaLQFhjS9fKQ6_W8zxPg8IStKBV40Snnms_y3i_sWLeAzXBnvD3WR3e7TzANY4BUy2Hr4HHVQv8xDDvZl6VO8xBt8ue1v_Be2maD4 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9NADLdGJ9B4mCDACBQ4JD4kULTk8nlICA22amOsKoiJvWW5y0VMVMlYO6HunX-Kvw778tGVib1N6kPVuE5O9tm-2P4Z4FkQ5XkuIu7ILBZOIIvAEYrjwVUKrTJUsUBTg_PeMNreDz4ehAdL8KfthaGyytYmGkOdV4reka-jXzG-PBHrRVMWMdocvDv-6dAEKcq0tuM0ahXZ1bNfeHybvN3ZRFk_53yw9fXDttNMGHBUELtTx8904Uld4JkelVEEBQ8zIYMQv8mAuzqOpEqUkHms_EQS8Ay651gqXJiSyit85HsNlmM8Fbk9WH6_NRx96fwAYbHVmVLq3eZhm1M1jXueR93_XkQIAMI5W_SKF0LdixWb_6RtjTcc3ILVJoxlG7Xe3YYlXVpw8xy4oQXXTXGpmliw0lnZmQX9uiGYfdPjIjvR7AVrf6hOfliwakZqvpywpsDxDvxGTWY0V7RFumVVwRreLMMP-3xKoBcTaqNCRuMZ2zPltfgoDO0ivWh6w4xVYyNTL4_cR_N6HmJXD9Rj9ShCdlSyDTNHkk2r9k53Yf9KRHsPemVV6vvAgjx3deQXXkbRmiuTiPAtolxzKQRPIhvcVnipapDVacDHOJ1jQpO8U6qmI3mnZza86v5yXMOKXEbcbzUibSzMJJ3vBxuedpfRNlDCJyt1dUo0EUZzSII0a7UCdXfjiedjBOPaEC-oVkdAuOOLV8qj7wZ_POQ-wUra8LpVwnOP9b9FPLh8EU_gBm7n9NPOcPchrHCKnUxpfB96qF36EUZ-U_m42WIMDq96V_8FxANscw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Construction+of+Physics+as+a+Quintessentially+Masculine+Subject%3A+Young+People%27s+Perceptions+of+Gender+Issues+in+Access+to+Physics&rft.jtitle=Sex+roles&rft.au=Francis%2C+Becky&rft.au=Archer%2C+Louise&rft.au=Moote%2C+Julie&rft.au=Dewitt%2C+Jen&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0360-0025&rft.eissn=1573-2762&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11199-016-0669-z&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=4301572401 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0360-0025&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0360-0025&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0360-0025&client=summon |