Evaluating the impact of early identification of asymptomatic brain metastases in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Background Brain metastases (BM) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been reported to be present in up to 25% of patients diagnosed with mRCC. There is limited published literature evaluating the role of routine intra‐cranial imaging for the screening of asymptomatic BM in mRCC. Aims To e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer reports Vol. 6; no. 3; pp. e1763 - n/a
Main Authors Parmar, Ambica, Ghosh, Sunita, Sahgal, Arjun, Lalani, Aly‐Khan A., Hansen, Aaron R., Reaume, M. Neil, Wood, Lori, Basappa, Naveen S., Heng, Daniel Y. C., Graham, Jeffrey, Kollmannsberger, Christian, Soulières, Denis, Breau, Rodney H., Tanguay, Simon, Kapoor, Anil, Pouliot, Frédéric, Bjarnason, Georg A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2023
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Brain metastases (BM) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been reported to be present in up to 25% of patients diagnosed with mRCC. There is limited published literature evaluating the role of routine intra‐cranial imaging for the screening of asymptomatic BM in mRCC. Aims To evaluate the potential utility of routine intra‐cranial imaging, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to characterize the outcomes of mRCC patients who presented with asymptomatic BM, as compared to symptomatic BM. Methods and Results The Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis) database was used to identify mRCC patients diagnosed with BM. This cohort was divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of BM symptoms. Details regarding patient demographics, disease characteristics, systemic treatments, BM characteristics and survival outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis was through chi‐square tests, analysis of variance, and Kaplan–Meier method to characterize survival outcomes. A p‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. A total of 267 mRCC patients with BM were identified of which 106 (40%) presented with asymptomatic disease. The majority of patients presented with multiple (i.e., >1) BM (75%) with no significant differences noted in number of BM or BM‐directed therapy received in symptomatic, as compared to asymptomatic BM patients. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] overall survival (OS) from mRCC diagnosis was 42 months (95% CI: 32–62) for patients with asymptomatic BM, and 39 months (95% CI: 29–48) with symptomatic BM (p = 0.10). OS from time of BM diagnosis was 28 months (95% CI: 18–42) for the asymptomatic BM group, as compared to 13 months (95% CI: 10–21) in the symptomatic BM group (p = 0.04). Conclusions Given a substantial proportion of patients may present with asymptomatic BM, limiting intra‐cranial imaging to patients with symptomatic BM, may be associated with a missed opportunity for timely diagnosis and treatment. The utility of routine intra‐cranial imaging in patients with renal cell carcinoma, warrants further prospective evaluation.
Bibliography:Funding information
The Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada (KCRNC); the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Funding information The Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada (KCRNC); the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis)
ISSN:2573-8348
2573-8348
DOI:10.1002/cnr2.1763