Wearable Loop Sensors for Knee Flexion Monitoring: Dynamic Measurements on Human Subjects
Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we ev...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology Vol. 5; pp. 542 - 550 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
IEEE
01.01.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art. We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art. Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art. Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art.Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art. |
Author | Cosma, Christopher Mishra, Vigyanshu Anderson, Ian Zhang, Yingzhe Kiourti, Asimina |
AuthorAffiliation | ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University 2647 Columbus OH 43212 USA Center for Applied Research in Electronics Indian Institute of Technology 28817 New Delhi 110016 India |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Center for Applied Research in Electronics Indian Institute of Technology 28817 New Delhi 110016 India – name: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University 2647 Columbus OH 43212 USA |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ian surname: Anderson fullname: Anderson, Ian organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Christopher orcidid: 0000-0003-1926-843X surname: Cosma fullname: Cosma, Christopher organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Yingzhe orcidid: 0000-0001-9099-2442 surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Yingzhe organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Vigyanshu orcidid: 0000-0002-1461-2724 surname: Mishra fullname: Mishra, Vigyanshu organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Asimina orcidid: 0000-0002-7111-9442 surname: Kiourti fullname: Kiourti, Asimina email: kiourti.1@osu.edu organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39050975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkktvEzEUhS1URB_0DyCELLFhk-DX2B42CEpLC4m6aCXEyrInd4KjGTvYMxX99zhNqFJWtuzvHN97fY7RQYgBEHpFyZRSUr-__nY-_zxlhIkpF1RxJZ-hIyaFmFCm5MHe_hCd5rwihLCKUsr0C3TIa1KRWlVH6OcPsMm6DvAsxjW-gZBjyriNCX8PAPiigz8-BjyPwQ8x-bD8gL_cB9v7Bs_B5jFBD2HIuDCXY28DvhndCpohv0TPW9tlON2tJ-j24vz27HIyu_56dfZpNmmErIeJ4wqAS8kcb6XQRALUTHLLWW0byReqFqVwbkvPYqGFc6T0JakQgrdKKX6Crra2i2hXZp18b9O9idabh4OYlsamwTcdGKhqYJVzrQBX5NqWCQioqgXwpioPFK-PW6_16HpYNKWxZLsnpk9vgv9llvHOlLFKXXNaHN7tHFL8PUIeTO9zA11nA8QxG060UIoptUHf_oeu4phCGdWGolprwmWh3uyX9FjLvx8sANsCTYo5J2gfEUrMJinmISlmkxSzS0oRvd6KPADsCSqpy9v8L5uTt5M |
CODEN | IOJEA7 |
Cites_doi | 10.1109/TBME.2007.896591 10.1007/s40279-019-01144-3 10.1186/1743-0003-3-6 10.1007/s11517-018-1802-7 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3289318 10.1109/TBME.2019.2895293 10.1109/TBME.2021.3103201 10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297212 10.1177/0269215517720790 10.1177/0363546514530088 10.1182/blood-2021-151532 10.1109/TBME.2012.2227317 10.1109/TBME.2013.2266341 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.05.013 10.1109/BHI.2012.6211541 10.1002/9781119683285.ch3 10.1109/JERM.2022.3175073 10.3390/s21062150 10.3390/s18124293 10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.039 10.3390/s24051549 10.1109/TAP.2019.2935147 10.1177/0363546515602016 10.1177/0363546515622387 10.1186/s12984-017-0270-x 10.1007/s00167-015-3762-x 10.3390/s20195687 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.015 10.1177/036354659402200511 10.1007/s40279-016-0607-9 10.1109/TBME.2012.2208750 10.1109/tlt.2010.27 10.1109/BSN.2016.7516291 10.1177/1528083719832854 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2363556 10.1007/s12178-017-9427-2 10.3109/02699052.2014.965206 10.1007/s40279-018-0871-y |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 The Authors. Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024 2024 The Authors 2024 Authors |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Authors. – notice: Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024 – notice: 2024 The Authors 2024 Authors |
DBID | 97E ESBDL RIA RIE AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3417376 |
DatabaseName | IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) - NZ CrossRef PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: RIE name: IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 2644-1276 |
EndPage | 550 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_e59e25bbf4eb4438a9754e55de3c5a10 PMC11268931 39050975 10_1109_OJEMB_2024_3417376 10568308 |
Genre | orig-research Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Science Foundation; U.S. National Science Foundation grantid: 2042644 funderid: 10.13039/100000001 – fundername: ; grantid: 2042644 |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 97E AAJGR ABAZT ABVLG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BEFXN BFFAM BGNUA BKEBE BPEOZ EBS ESBDL GROUPED_DOAJ JAVBF M~E OCL OK1 PGMZT RIA RIE RPM AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-b37ee3662b3f64806ee9263a329ac63d7940253a1094d84bb0644614443f7773 |
IEDL.DBID | RIE |
ISSN | 2644-1276 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:29 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:33:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:38:15 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 28 13:51:14 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:38:44 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:18:17 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 27 01:53:52 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | joint flexion wearables Calibration dynamic motion capture human subject validation loop sensors e-textile |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2024 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c469t-b37ee3662b3f64806ee9263a329ac63d7940253a1094d84bb0644614443f7773 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-1461-2724 0000-0003-1926-843X 0000-0002-7111-9442 0000-0001-9099-2442 |
OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10568308 |
PMID | 39050975 |
PQID | 3081888036 |
PQPubID | 5075789 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_39050975 crossref_primary_10_1109_OJEMB_2024_3417376 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e59e25bbf4eb4438a9754e55de3c5a10 proquest_miscellaneous_3084772771 proquest_journals_3081888036 ieee_primary_10568308 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11268931 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2024 text: 2024-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | OJEMB |
PublicationTitleAlternate | IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | IEEE The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Publisher_xml | – name: IEEE – name: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref38 ref18 ref24 ref23 Kahan (ref21) 2014 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref41 ref22 Kiefer (ref29) 2015; 14 ref28 (ref19) 2022 ref27 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 |
References_xml | – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.896591 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01144-3 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-6 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1802-7 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3289318 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2895293 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3103201 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297212 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1177/0269215517720790 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1177/0363546514530088 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-151532 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2227317 – year: 2022 ident: ref19 article-title: Liberator conductive fiber - metal clad fibers – year: 2014 ident: ref21 article-title: Miscalculating area and angles of a needle-like triangle – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2266341 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.05.013 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1109/BHI.2012.6211541 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1002/9781119683285.ch3 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1109/JERM.2022.3175073 – volume: 14 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: ref29 article-title: A commentary on real-time biofeedback to augment neuromuscular training for ACL injury prevention in adolescent athletes publication-title: J. Sports Sci. Med. – ident: ref22 doi: 10.3390/s21062150 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.3390/s18124293 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.039 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.3390/s24051549 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2935147 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1177/0363546515602016 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1177/0363546515622387 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0270-x – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3762-x – ident: ref1 doi: 10.3390/s20195687 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.015 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1177/036354659402200511 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0607-9 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2208750 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1109/tlt.2010.27 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1109/BSN.2016.7516291 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1177/1528083719832854 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2363556 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9427-2 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.965206 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0871-y |
SSID | ssj0002511128 |
Score | 2.2433488 |
Snippet | Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our... We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous... Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref ieee |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 542 |
SubjectTerms | Angular resolution Biomedical monitoring Calibration Cameras Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients dynamic motion capture e-textile Error detection Gold Human motion human subject validation Human subjects joint flexion Legged locomotion Lidar loop sensors Monitoring Motion capture Network analysers Phantoms Root-mean-square errors Sensors Smart textiles State-of-the-art reviews Walking Wearable sensors Wearable technology wearables |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT3BAPAqkFGQkblXaJONH3BulXVWlC4cWUU5WHDtqL0nV3f7_ztjZJYsqceEaO3H8jWc8M7Y_M_YZVN1qHdpcNCXkAgNlVCkcy1603mt0UEVcMZ1_V6c_xdmVvJpc9UV7whI9cALuIEgTKulcJ4ITAurGaCmClD5AK5t0uArnvEkwRTaYHGe0vKtTMoU5-HF2Mj_CeLAS-2i4NRDJyGQmioT94w0rjzmbf--ZnExCsxfs-eg98i_pr1-yJ6F_xZ5NOAVfs9-_cOzSeSh-Pgy3_ALD1OFuwdE35d-wEp8RA-bQ86TM9M4hP07X0vP5n4ThgmOdmOHnaFsoWbPYZpezk8uvp_l4f0LeYtC7zB3oEECpykGnRF2oEEyloIHKNK0Cj6qIQAGCaISvhXPonggKEAV0Wmt4w7b6oQ_vGC9VhwV16zpdidC5xuumlNp30pnCG52xvRWU9jaxZNgYXRTGRuAtAW9H4DN2RGivaxLDdXyAcrej3O2_5J6xbZLVpDmpaijqjO2uhGdHdVxYIOI-tFSAbX9aF6Mi0epI04fhPtYRGGpoXWbsbZL1-uNgiCZHy4zVG6NgowubJf3NdSTrpiNa6BOWO_-j0-_ZUwIypYB22dby7j58QKdo6T7G8f8A0iAHFw priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Wearable Loop Sensors for Knee Flexion Monitoring: Dynamic Measurements on Human Subjects |
URI | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10568308 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39050975 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3081888036 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3084772771 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11268931 https://doaj.org/article/e59e25bbf4eb4438a9754e55de3c5a10 |
Volume | 5 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwEB5BD6gcKI9S0paVkbihbDexEye9tdBVVdhyoIhyimJ7IhBSUnV3L_z6ztjJsluBxC2KnfgxD8839owB3sq8sFqjjVWdyFgRUCaRIl52yjqnyUBVfsd0dpmff1UX19l1H6zuY2EQ0R8-wzE_-r1819klu8qO-Jb4QnJo70NCbiFYa-VQYVuZlO0QGDMpjz5fnM1OCQKmaky6WpMobcMjwvi0RvKxwrV1yKfr7-9X-Zupef_E5NoSNN2By6Hz4eTJr_FyYcb29728jv89uqfwpDdGxUngnmfwANvn8HgtReEL-P6NRIHDq8SnrrsRXwj1drdzQaau-EiVxJQTanatCLqBvzkWH8It92L2x_84F1THbxgIUlXs-5nvwtX07Or9edxfxxBbwtCL2EiNKPM8NbLJVTHJEcs0l7VMy9rm0pFkExFkTVOvXKGMIWtHMd5UstFay5ew1XYtvgKR5A0VFNY0OlXYmNrpOsm0azJTTlypI3g30Ka6CUk3Kg9WJmXliVoxUaueqBGcMvlWNTlhtn9Bs1v18ldhVmKaGdMoNNShoiYWUJhlDqXNqMsR7DJF1poLxIjgcOCGqpfueSU5DyApPkltv1kVk1zyZkvdYrf0dRQhF62TCPYC86x-PvBgBMUGW20MYbOk_fnD5_7miC8yMZP9f_T3ALZ5boKT6BC2FrdLfE1m08KMvLth5IVm5L1ad9NGFGM |
linkProvider | IEEE |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjR1db9Mw8ISGBOOB8bFB2AAj8YbSNbETJ7xtsKpsbXmgiPFkxfFFIKRkWtsXfj13TtK1E0i8RbETf9z32XcH8FamWak1lqEqIhkqMpSJpAiXnSqd06SgKn9iOp2l46_q_DK57ILVfSwMIvrLZzjgR3-W75pyxa6yY64Sn0kO7b1Lgj-J23CttUuFtWVit31ozDA__nx-Nj0lIzBWA-LWmohpF-6RlU9Ski8Wbkgin7C_q7DyN2Xz9p3JDSE02oNZP_327smvwWppB-XvW5kd_3t9j-Bhp46KkxZ_HsMdrJ_Ag40khU_h-zciBg6wEpOmuRJfyO5trheClF1xQZ3EiFNqNrVouQN_8158bOvci-mNB3IhqI8_MhDErNj7s9iH-ehs_mEcdgUZwpKs6GVopUaUaRpbWaUqG6aIeZzKQsZ5UabSEW0TEGRBW69cpqwlfUexxalkpbWWB7BTNzU-BxGlFTVkpa10rLCyhdNFlGhXJTYfulwH8K6Hjblq024Yb64Mc-OBahiopgNqAKcMvnVPTpntX9Dumo4CDSY5xom1lUJLE8oKQgGFSeJQlglNOYB9hsjGcC0wAjjqscF09L0wkjMBEuuTNPabdTNRJh-3FDU2K99Hke2idRTAsxZ51j_vcTCAbAuttpaw3VL__OGzf3PMFymZ0Yt_zPc13B_PpxMz-TS7OIRd3qfWZXQEO8vrFb4kJWppX3nS-QNbORWo |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wearable+Loop+Sensors+for+Knee+Flexion+Monitoring%3A+Dynamic+Measurements+on+Human+Subjects&rft.jtitle=IEEE+open+journal+of+engineering+in+medicine+and+biology&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.pub=IEEE&rft.eissn=2644-1276&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FOJEMB.2024.3417376&rft.externalDocID=PMC11268931 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2644-1276&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2644-1276&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2644-1276&client=summon |