Wearable Loop Sensors for Knee Flexion Monitoring: Dynamic Measurements on Human Subjects

Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we ev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology Vol. 5; pp. 542 - 550
Main Authors Anderson, Ian, Cosma, Christopher, Zhang, Yingzhe, Mishra, Vigyanshu, Kiourti, Asimina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.01.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art.
AbstractList Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art.
We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art.
Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art.
Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art.Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous studies reported a proof-of-concept on a cylindrical phantom limb, under static scenarios and with a rigid sensor. In this work, we evaluate our sensors, for the first time, on human subjects, under dynamic scenarios, using a flexible textile-based prototype tethered to a network analyzer. An untethered version is also presented and validated on phantoms, aiming towards a fully wearable design. Methods: Three dynamic activities (walking, brisk walking, and full flexion/extension, all performed in place) are used to validate the tethered sensor on ten (10) adults. The untethered sensor is validated upon a cylindrical phantom that is bent manually at random speed. A calibration mechanism is developed to derive the sensor-measured angles. These angles are then compared to gold-standard angles simultaneously captured by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) depth camera using root mean square error (RMSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient as metrics. Results: We find excellent correlation (≥ 0.981) to gold-standard angles. The sensor achieves an RMSE of 4.463° ± 1.266° for walking, 5.541° ± 2.082° for brisk walking, 3.657° ± 1.815° for full flexion/extension activities, and 0.670° ± 0.366° for the phantom bending test. Conclusion: The tethered sensor achieves similar to slightly higher RMSE as compared to other wearable flexion sensors on human subjects, while the untethered version achieves excellent RMSE on the phantom model. Concurrently, our sensors are reliable over time and injury-safe, and do not obstruct natural movement. Our results set the ground for future improvements in angular resolution and for realizing fully wearable designs, while maintaining the abovementioned advantages over the state-of-the-art.
Author Cosma, Christopher
Mishra, Vigyanshu
Anderson, Ian
Zhang, Yingzhe
Kiourti, Asimina
AuthorAffiliation ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University 2647 Columbus OH 43212 USA
Center for Applied Research in Electronics Indian Institute of Technology 28817 New Delhi 110016 India
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Center for Applied Research in Electronics Indian Institute of Technology 28817 New Delhi 110016 India
– name: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University 2647 Columbus OH 43212 USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ian
  surname: Anderson
  fullname: Anderson, Ian
  organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Christopher
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1926-843X
  surname: Cosma
  fullname: Cosma, Christopher
  organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yingzhe
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9099-2442
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Yingzhe
  organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Vigyanshu
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1461-2724
  surname: Mishra
  fullname: Mishra, Vigyanshu
  organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Asimina
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7111-9442
  surname: Kiourti
  fullname: Kiourti, Asimina
  email: kiourti.1@osu.edu
  organization: ElectroScience Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39050975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkktvEzEUhS1URB_0DyCELLFhk-DX2B42CEpLC4m6aCXEyrInd4KjGTvYMxX99zhNqFJWtuzvHN97fY7RQYgBEHpFyZRSUr-__nY-_zxlhIkpF1RxJZ-hIyaFmFCm5MHe_hCd5rwihLCKUsr0C3TIa1KRWlVH6OcPsMm6DvAsxjW-gZBjyriNCX8PAPiigz8-BjyPwQ8x-bD8gL_cB9v7Bs_B5jFBD2HIuDCXY28DvhndCpohv0TPW9tlON2tJ-j24vz27HIyu_56dfZpNmmErIeJ4wqAS8kcb6XQRALUTHLLWW0byReqFqVwbkvPYqGFc6T0JakQgrdKKX6Crra2i2hXZp18b9O9idabh4OYlsamwTcdGKhqYJVzrQBX5NqWCQioqgXwpioPFK-PW6_16HpYNKWxZLsnpk9vgv9llvHOlLFKXXNaHN7tHFL8PUIeTO9zA11nA8QxG060UIoptUHf_oeu4phCGdWGolprwmWh3uyX9FjLvx8sANsCTYo5J2gfEUrMJinmISlmkxSzS0oRvd6KPADsCSqpy9v8L5uTt5M
CODEN IOJEA7
Cites_doi 10.1109/TBME.2007.896591
10.1007/s40279-019-01144-3
10.1186/1743-0003-3-6
10.1007/s11517-018-1802-7
10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3289318
10.1109/TBME.2019.2895293
10.1109/TBME.2021.3103201
10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297212
10.1177/0269215517720790
10.1177/0363546514530088
10.1182/blood-2021-151532
10.1109/TBME.2012.2227317
10.1109/TBME.2013.2266341
10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.05.013
10.1109/BHI.2012.6211541
10.1002/9781119683285.ch3
10.1109/JERM.2022.3175073
10.3390/s21062150
10.3390/s18124293
10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.039
10.3390/s24051549
10.1109/TAP.2019.2935147
10.1177/0363546515602016
10.1177/0363546515622387
10.1186/s12984-017-0270-x
10.1007/s00167-015-3762-x
10.3390/s20195687
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.015
10.1177/036354659402200511
10.1007/s40279-016-0607-9
10.1109/TBME.2012.2208750
10.1109/tlt.2010.27
10.1109/BSN.2016.7516291
10.1177/1528083719832854
10.1109/LAWP.2014.2363556
10.1007/s12178-017-9427-2
10.3109/02699052.2014.965206
10.1007/s40279-018-0871-y
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 The Authors.
Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024
2024 The Authors 2024 Authors
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 The Authors.
– notice: Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024
– notice: 2024 The Authors 2024 Authors
DBID 97E
ESBDL
RIA
RIE
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3417376
DatabaseName IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present
IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals
IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present
IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) - NZ
CrossRef
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: RIE
  name: IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 2644-1276
EndPage 550
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_e59e25bbf4eb4438a9754e55de3c5a10
PMC11268931
39050975
10_1109_OJEMB_2024_3417376
10568308
Genre orig-research
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Science Foundation; U.S. National Science Foundation
  grantid: 2042644
  funderid: 10.13039/100000001
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 2042644
GroupedDBID 0R~
97E
AAJGR
ABAZT
ABVLG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BEFXN
BFFAM
BGNUA
BKEBE
BPEOZ
EBS
ESBDL
GROUPED_DOAJ
JAVBF
M~E
OCL
OK1
PGMZT
RIA
RIE
RPM
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-b37ee3662b3f64806ee9263a329ac63d7940253a1094d84bb0644614443f7773
IEDL.DBID RIE
ISSN 2644-1276
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:32:29 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:33:39 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:38:15 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 28 13:51:14 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:38:44 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:18:17 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 27 01:53:52 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords joint flexion
wearables
Calibration
dynamic motion capture
human subject validation
loop sensors
e-textile
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
2024 The Authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c469t-b37ee3662b3f64806ee9263a329ac63d7940253a1094d84bb0644614443f7773
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-1461-2724
0000-0003-1926-843X
0000-0002-7111-9442
0000-0001-9099-2442
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10568308
PMID 39050975
PQID 3081888036
PQPubID 5075789
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_39050975
crossref_primary_10_1109_OJEMB_2024_3417376
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e59e25bbf4eb4438a9754e55de3c5a10
proquest_miscellaneous_3084772771
proquest_journals_3081888036
ieee_primary_10568308
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11268931
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology
PublicationTitleAbbrev OJEMB
PublicationTitleAlternate IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher IEEE
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Publisher_xml – name: IEEE
– name: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
References ref13
ref35
ref12
ref34
ref15
ref37
ref14
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref11
ref33
ref10
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref39
ref16
ref38
ref18
ref24
ref23
Kahan (ref21) 2014
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref41
ref22
Kiefer (ref29) 2015; 14
ref28
(ref19) 2022
ref27
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
References_xml – ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.896591
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01144-3
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-6
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1802-7
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3289318
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2895293
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3103201
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297212
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1177/0269215517720790
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1177/0363546514530088
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-151532
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2227317
– year: 2022
  ident: ref19
  article-title: Liberator conductive fiber - metal clad fibers
– year: 2014
  ident: ref21
  article-title: Miscalculating area and angles of a needle-like triangle
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2266341
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.05.013
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1109/BHI.2012.6211541
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1002/9781119683285.ch3
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1109/JERM.2022.3175073
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: ref29
  article-title: A commentary on real-time biofeedback to augment neuromuscular training for ACL injury prevention in adolescent athletes
  publication-title: J. Sports Sci. Med.
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.3390/s21062150
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.3390/s18124293
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.039
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.3390/s24051549
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2935147
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1177/0363546515602016
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.1177/0363546515622387
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0270-x
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3762-x
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.3390/s20195687
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.015
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1177/036354659402200511
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0607-9
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2208750
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1109/tlt.2010.27
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1109/BSN.2016.7516291
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1177/1528083719832854
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2363556
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9427-2
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.965206
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0871-y
SSID ssj0002511128
Score 2.2433488
Snippet Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our...
We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our previous...
Goals: We have recently introduced a new class of wearable loop sensors for joint flexion monitoring that overcomes limitations in the state-of-the-art. Our...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
ieee
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 542
SubjectTerms Angular resolution
Biomedical monitoring
Calibration
Cameras
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
dynamic motion capture
e-textile
Error detection
Gold
Human motion
human subject validation
Human subjects
joint flexion
Legged locomotion
Lidar
loop sensors
Monitoring
Motion capture
Network analysers
Phantoms
Root-mean-square errors
Sensors
Smart textiles
State-of-the-art reviews
Walking
Wearable sensors
Wearable technology
wearables
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT3BAPAqkFGQkblXaJONH3BulXVWlC4cWUU5WHDtqL0nV3f7_ztjZJYsqceEaO3H8jWc8M7Y_M_YZVN1qHdpcNCXkAgNlVCkcy1603mt0UEVcMZ1_V6c_xdmVvJpc9UV7whI9cALuIEgTKulcJ4ITAurGaCmClD5AK5t0uArnvEkwRTaYHGe0vKtTMoU5-HF2Mj_CeLAS-2i4NRDJyGQmioT94w0rjzmbf--ZnExCsxfs-eg98i_pr1-yJ6F_xZ5NOAVfs9-_cOzSeSh-Pgy3_ALD1OFuwdE35d-wEp8RA-bQ86TM9M4hP07X0vP5n4ThgmOdmOHnaFsoWbPYZpezk8uvp_l4f0LeYtC7zB3oEECpykGnRF2oEEyloIHKNK0Cj6qIQAGCaISvhXPonggKEAV0Wmt4w7b6oQ_vGC9VhwV16zpdidC5xuumlNp30pnCG52xvRWU9jaxZNgYXRTGRuAtAW9H4DN2RGivaxLDdXyAcrej3O2_5J6xbZLVpDmpaijqjO2uhGdHdVxYIOI-tFSAbX9aF6Mi0epI04fhPtYRGGpoXWbsbZL1-uNgiCZHy4zVG6NgowubJf3NdSTrpiNa6BOWO_-j0-_ZUwIypYB22dby7j58QKdo6T7G8f8A0iAHFw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Wearable Loop Sensors for Knee Flexion Monitoring: Dynamic Measurements on Human Subjects
URI https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10568308
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39050975
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3081888036
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3084772771
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11268931
https://doaj.org/article/e59e25bbf4eb4438a9754e55de3c5a10
Volume 5
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwEB5BD6gcKI9S0paVkbihbDexEye9tdBVVdhyoIhyimJ7IhBSUnV3L_z6ztjJsluBxC2KnfgxD8839owB3sq8sFqjjVWdyFgRUCaRIl52yjqnyUBVfsd0dpmff1UX19l1H6zuY2EQ0R8-wzE_-r1819klu8qO-Jb4QnJo70NCbiFYa-VQYVuZlO0QGDMpjz5fnM1OCQKmaky6WpMobcMjwvi0RvKxwrV1yKfr7-9X-Zupef_E5NoSNN2By6Hz4eTJr_FyYcb29728jv89uqfwpDdGxUngnmfwANvn8HgtReEL-P6NRIHDq8SnrrsRXwj1drdzQaau-EiVxJQTanatCLqBvzkWH8It92L2x_84F1THbxgIUlXs-5nvwtX07Or9edxfxxBbwtCL2EiNKPM8NbLJVTHJEcs0l7VMy9rm0pFkExFkTVOvXKGMIWtHMd5UstFay5ew1XYtvgKR5A0VFNY0OlXYmNrpOsm0azJTTlypI3g30Ka6CUk3Kg9WJmXliVoxUaueqBGcMvlWNTlhtn9Bs1v18ldhVmKaGdMoNNShoiYWUJhlDqXNqMsR7DJF1poLxIjgcOCGqpfueSU5DyApPkltv1kVk1zyZkvdYrf0dRQhF62TCPYC86x-PvBgBMUGW20MYbOk_fnD5_7miC8yMZP9f_T3ALZ5boKT6BC2FrdLfE1m08KMvLth5IVm5L1ad9NGFGM
linkProvider IEEE
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjR1db9Mw8ISGBOOB8bFB2AAj8YbSNbETJ7xtsKpsbXmgiPFkxfFFIKRkWtsXfj13TtK1E0i8RbETf9z32XcH8FamWak1lqEqIhkqMpSJpAiXnSqd06SgKn9iOp2l46_q_DK57ILVfSwMIvrLZzjgR3-W75pyxa6yY64Sn0kO7b1Lgj-J23CttUuFtWVit31ozDA__nx-Nj0lIzBWA-LWmohpF-6RlU9Ski8Wbkgin7C_q7DyN2Xz9p3JDSE02oNZP_327smvwWppB-XvW5kd_3t9j-Bhp46KkxZ_HsMdrJ_Ag40khU_h-zciBg6wEpOmuRJfyO5trheClF1xQZ3EiFNqNrVouQN_8158bOvci-mNB3IhqI8_MhDErNj7s9iH-ehs_mEcdgUZwpKs6GVopUaUaRpbWaUqG6aIeZzKQsZ5UabSEW0TEGRBW69cpqwlfUexxalkpbWWB7BTNzU-BxGlFTVkpa10rLCyhdNFlGhXJTYfulwH8K6Hjblq024Yb64Mc-OBahiopgNqAKcMvnVPTpntX9Dumo4CDSY5xom1lUJLE8oKQgGFSeJQlglNOYB9hsjGcC0wAjjqscF09L0wkjMBEuuTNPabdTNRJh-3FDU2K99Hke2idRTAsxZ51j_vcTCAbAuttpaw3VL__OGzf3PMFymZ0Yt_zPc13B_PpxMz-TS7OIRd3qfWZXQEO8vrFb4kJWppX3nS-QNbORWo
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wearable+Loop+Sensors+for+Knee+Flexion+Monitoring%3A+Dynamic+Measurements+on+Human+Subjects&rft.jtitle=IEEE+open+journal+of+engineering+in+medicine+and+biology&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.pub=IEEE&rft.eissn=2644-1276&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FOJEMB.2024.3417376&rft.externalDocID=PMC11268931
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2644-1276&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2644-1276&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2644-1276&client=summon