Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia
Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, loggi...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in veterinary science Vol. 11; p. 1370909 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
12.03.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants
(Elephas maximus)
that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants
that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia. Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia. Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia.Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia. Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia. |
Author | Thitaram, Chatchote Ghimire, Raman Brown, Janine L. Bansiddhi, Pakkanut |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai , Thailand 2 Center of Elephant and Wildlife Health, Chiang Mai University Animal Hospital , Chiang Mai , Thailand 3 Elephant, Wildlife, and Companion Animals Research Group, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai , Thailand 4 Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute , Front Royal, VA , United States |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai , Thailand – name: 3 Elephant, Wildlife, and Companion Animals Research Group, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai , Thailand – name: 2 Center of Elephant and Wildlife Health, Chiang Mai University Animal Hospital , Chiang Mai , Thailand – name: 4 Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute , Front Royal, VA , United States |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Raman surname: Ghimire fullname: Ghimire, Raman – sequence: 2 givenname: Janine L. surname: Brown fullname: Brown, Janine L. – sequence: 3 givenname: Chatchote surname: Thitaram fullname: Thitaram, Chatchote – sequence: 4 givenname: Pakkanut surname: Bansiddhi fullname: Bansiddhi, Pakkanut |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38532794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kjtvFDEUhUcoiISQP0CBXNLs4vFjPKZBUcQjUiQaqK27nutdR57xYHsXUfDf8T6CEgoqWz73fEe2z8vmbIoTNs3rli457_U7t8OSl4wysWy5oprqZ80FY1otWtXps0f78-Yq53tKaSuF4j190ZzzXnKmtLhoft_EcYbkc5xIdAQmP0IgPzE4SEggZ8x5xKmQEmPIVR_IiGUThxji2mN-TybEgbiYqkbQObTF76pznlMEuzkoFubDIQacNzCVTPxErrOHV81zByHj1Wm9bL5_-vjt5svi7uvn25vru4UVnS4L0fc9cgZSWUTHQLVa8xYtHbqWdry3SgJjTg7cUqaGVStAaiU5x1YxKi2_bG6P3CHCvZlTvWT6ZSJ4cziIaW0gFW8DGiE1Bce4BMEEdApgGFYrB0Adk6h5ZX04subtasTB1sdJEJ5AnyqT35h13JmW6k5oqirh7YmQ4o8t5mJGny2GABPGbTacUi4E7TpdR988Dvub8vCBdaA_DtgUc07ojPUFio_7bB9qqNnXxRzqYvZ1Mae6VCv7x_pA_4_pD9Fhxoo |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2024_1459560 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_18161 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_18370 crossref_primary_10_3390_jzbg5040051 |
Cites_doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0144276 10.7717/peerj.5996 10.20506/rst.24.2.1594 10.14202/vetworld.2022.647-654 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.009 10.1111/izy.12247 10.1126/science.1164298 10.1002/zoo.20281 10.1002/zoo.20260 10.3390/ani9060326 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105453 10.3390/ani9010027 10.3390/ani10112026 10.3389/fvets.2023.1284869 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.001 10.3390/ani12213031 10.3389/fvets.2018.00323 10.1111/izy.12222 10.1002/zoo.20087 10.20894/STET.116.003.003.002 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)1 10.7120/09627286.27.3.235 10.7717/peerj.6756 10.3390/ani10101870 10.1371/journal.pone.0154750 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00001.x 10.1136/vr.104309 10.3390/ani10060919 10.5686/jjzwm.17.91 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.018 10.46867/ijcp.2013.26.01.05 10.19227/jzar.v9i4.607 10.3390/ani10071189 10.1002/zoo.21677 10.1002/zoo.215753 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105965 10.3389/fnint.2013.00086 10.1002/zoo.21746 10.3390/ani10010039 10.1371/journal.pone.0204965 10.1080/09669582.2011.566927 10.1177/026119291003800304 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:3<209:AID-ZOO4>3.0.CO;2-7 10.1079/9781789245868.0019A 10.3390/ani6100059 10.1371/journal.pone.0155146 10.7120/09627286.25.4.395 10.1007/s10539-022-09862-1 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977994.003.0004 10.1007/s10806-012-9434-7 10.3390/ani8080130 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105456 10.3390/ani12131719 10.3390/ani8070111 10.3390/ani10071132 10.3138/jvme.37.1.3 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)18:4<335:AID-ZOO8>3.0.CO;2-X 10.1002/zoo.20276 10.1017/S0962728600016092 10.1080/10888705.2015.1137755 10.3390/ani13121966 10.3390/ani10112101 10.7120/09627286.23.1.011 10.3389/fvets.2023.1303537 10.1017/awf.2023.84 10.1371/journal.pone.0139092 10.3390/ani10101928 10.26451/abc.07.01.06.2020 10.3390/ani11113090 10.7120/09627286.24.3.267 10.3390/vetsci9040170 10.1093/conphys/cov030 10.1016/0006-3207(77)90056-8 10.3390/ani13162595 10.1002/zoo.20253 10.1638/2007-0008R1.1 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1998)17:4<311:AID-ZOO5>3.0.CO;2-C 10.1002/zoo.21733 10.3390/ani8070110 10.1080/10888705.2020.1809412 10.1080/10888705.2015.1075830 10.1093/conphyscoy077 10.7120/09627286.24.2.139 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00063.x 10.1002/zoo.20303 10.1017/S096272860002604X 10.26451/abc.06.03.01.2019 10.1371/journal.pone.0155223 10.3390/ani10040737 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.04.011 10.1080/10888705.2019.1569522 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.010 10.1371/journal.pone.0210783 10.3389/fvets.2022.1033821 10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.02.001 10.1371/journal.pone.0145673 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi. Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi. 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi. – notice: Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi. 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1370909 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Veterinary Medicine |
EISSN | 2297-1769 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_4590af235a424a67aaddbbfaa0f25e93 PMC10964907 38532794 10_3389_fvets_2024_1370909 |
Genre | Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 9T4 AAFWJ AAYXX ACGFS ACXDI ADBBV ADRAZ AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV CITATION ECGQY EYRJQ GROUPED_DOAJ HYE KQ8 M48 M~E OK1 PGMZT RPM IAG IAO IEA IPNFZ NPM RIG 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-4888e32a57ceef2a719931ec0d610638c75a22f5d3c027db14a597533e17205c3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2297-1769 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:29 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:35:40 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:43:20 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:37:23 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:24:02 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | tourist camp welfare assessment framework zoo animal welfare captive elephant |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c469t-4888e32a57ceef2a719931ec0d610638c75a22f5d3c027db14a597533e17205c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 Chase A. LaDue, Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden, United States Reviewed by: Paul Rose, University of Exeter, United Kingdom Edited by: Edward Narayan, The University of Queensland, Australia |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3389/fvets.2024.1370909 |
PMID | 38532794 |
PQID | 3003440669 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4590af235a424a67aaddbbfaa0f25e93 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10964907 proquest_miscellaneous_3003440669 pubmed_primary_38532794 crossref_citationtrail_10_3389_fvets_2024_1370909 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2024_1370909 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-03-12 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-03-12 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2024 text: 2024-03-12 day: 12 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland |
PublicationTitle | Frontiers in veterinary science |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Front Vet Sci |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Frontiers Media S.A |
Publisher_xml | – name: Frontiers Media S.A |
References | Wark (ref73) 2020; 10 Campos-Rodríguez (ref106) 2013; 7 Veasey (ref30) 2006; 40 (ref86) 2023 Tallo-Parra (ref24) 2023; 13 Hill (ref33) 2009; 28 Fazio (ref79) 2020; 10 Littlewood (ref11) 2023; 10 Lair (ref29) 1997 Clubb (ref38) 2002 Harris (ref43) 2008 (ref13) 2019 Whitham (ref100) 2016; 25 Sukumar (ref27) 2006; 40 Gurusamy (ref96) 2014; 23 (ref66) 2017 Duffy (ref65) 2011; 19 Menon (ref58) 2019; 53 Mellor (ref12) 2015 Taylor (ref39) 1998; 17 Veasey (ref102) 2020; 10 Caporale (ref115) 2005; 24 Holst (ref18) 2021; 24 Greco (ref35) 2016; 11 Edwards (ref108) 2019; 7 (ref93) 2023 Saiyed (ref74) 2019; 9 Vanitha (ref56) 2010; 3 Spain (ref77) 2020; 7 Thitaram (ref40) 2012; 17 Brown (ref45) 2016; 11 Wark (ref72) 2019; 6 Jones (ref25) 2022; 9 Korte (ref109) 2007; 92 O’Brien (ref89) 2023; 264 Staley (ref105) 2018; 102 Hutchins (ref41) 2006; 25 Honess (ref90) 2010; 38 Miller (ref46) 2016; 11 Fraser (ref3) 2009; 28 Meehan (ref95) 2019; 53 Brambell (ref6) 1965 Carlstead (ref82) 1999; 18 Bansiddhi (ref60) 2018; 6 Vancuylenberg (ref31) 1977; 12 Hampton (ref14) 2023; 32 Laule (ref59) 2009 Fuktong (ref50) 2021; 243 Browning (ref32) 2022; 37 Brown (ref62) 2020; 10 Mason (ref110) 1993; 2 Bayvel (ref2) 2012; 21 Miller (ref36) 2016; 19 Mumby (ref54) 2015; 3 Eden (ref7) 2005 Varma (ref118) 2008 Blokhuis (ref4) 2003; 12 Schmidt-Burbach (ref52) 2015; 10 Rose (ref21) 2020; 10 Schmidt-Burbach (ref53) 2017 Racciatti (ref70) 2022; 9 ref99 Nokkaew (ref48) 2022; 15 Gruber (ref34) 2000; 19 Maher (ref84) 2021; 11 Lasky (ref37) 2021; 40 Benn (ref19) 2019; 9 Clubb (ref42) 2008; 322 Mason (ref44) 2010; 29 Less (ref85) 2012; 137 McCulloch (ref9) 2013; 26 (ref116) 2017 Sukumar (ref28) 1992 Fultz (ref76) 2023; 13 Mellor (ref5) 1994 Ward (ref94) 2020; 10 Williams (ref101) 2018; 27 Krishnamurthy (ref117) 1998; 3 Brando (ref16) 2018; 156 Mellor (ref8) 2016; 6 Gurusamy (ref71) 2021 Salas (ref22) 2018; 8 Kosaruk (ref107) 2020; 10 Wazara (ref87) 2021 Bansiddhi (ref63) 2019; 7 Borger-Turner (ref20) 2015; 24 Greggor (ref15) 2018; 5 Huskisson (ref80) 2021; 243 Whitham (ref81) 2009; 28 Mellor (ref10) 2020; 10 Bansiddhi (ref97) 2020; 10 Bansiddhi (ref64) 2020; 23 Schilling (ref103) 2022; 12 Norkaew (ref49) 2018; 13 Kagan (ref17) 2015; 18 Menargues Marcilla (ref113) 2012; 176 Doyle (ref57) 2014 Wolfensohn (ref26) 2018; 8 King (ref61) 2005; 35 Schmidt-Burbach (ref51) 2020 Yon (ref23) 2019; 14 Yeates (ref104) 2008; 175 Morfeld (ref47) 2016; 11 Wielebnowski (ref83) 1999; 18 Prado-Oviedo (ref111) 2016; 11 Smith (ref78) 2023; 42 Supanta (ref114) 2023; 10 Sherwen (ref67) 2018; 8 Justice (ref91) 2017; 181 (ref98) 2013 Galante (ref75) 2022; 12 Brouwers (ref92) 2021; 9 Veasey (ref1) 2022; 41 Wolfensohn (ref69) 2015; 24 Scherer (ref88) 2023; 42 Posta (ref112) 2013; 26 Ramanathan (ref55) 2008; 39 Barber (ref68) 2009; 28 |
References_xml | – volume: 11 start-page: e0144276 year: 2016 ident: ref35 article-title: The days and nights of zoo elephants: using epidemiology to better understand stereotypic behavior of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in north American zoos publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144276 – volume: 6 start-page: e5996 year: 2018 ident: ref60 article-title: Changing trends in elephant camp management in northern Thailand and implications for welfare publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.5996 – volume: 24 start-page: 567 year: 2005 ident: ref115 article-title: Global perspectives on animal welfare: Europe publication-title: Rev Sci Tech doi: 10.20506/rst.24.2.1594 – volume-title: The Asian elephant: Ecology and management year: 1992 ident: ref28 – volume: 15 start-page: 647 year: 2022 ident: ref48 article-title: Study of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in captive Asian elephants Elephas maximus in Kanchanaburi Province publication-title: Thailand Vet World doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.647-654 – volume: 175 start-page: 293 year: 2008 ident: ref104 article-title: Assessment of positive welfare: a review publication-title: Vet J doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.009 – volume: 53 start-page: 17 year: 2019 ident: ref58 article-title: Population status of Asian elephants Elephas maximus and key threats publication-title: Int Zoo Yb doi: 10.1111/izy.12247 – ident: ref99 – volume: 322 start-page: 1649 year: 2008 ident: ref42 article-title: Compromised survivorship in zoo elephants publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1164298 – volume: 28 start-page: 545 year: 2009 ident: ref81 article-title: Animal-based welfare monitoring: using keeper ratings as an assessment tool publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.20281 – volume: 28 start-page: 519 year: 2009 ident: ref68 article-title: Programmatic approaches to assessing and improving animal welfare in zoos and aquariums publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.20260 – volume: 9 start-page: 326 year: 2019 ident: ref74 article-title: Evaluating the behavior and temperament of African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) in a non-contact animal encounter program publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani9060326 – volume: 243 start-page: 105453 year: 2021 ident: ref80 article-title: Assessing the potential impact of zoo visitors on the welfare and cognitive performance of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) publication-title: Appl Anim Behav Sci doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105453 – volume: 9 start-page: 27 year: 2019 ident: ref19 article-title: A review of welfare assessment methods in reptiles, and preliminary application of the Welfare quality® protocol to the pygmy blue-tongue skink, Tiliqua adelaidensis, using animal-based measures publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani9010027 – volume: 10 start-page: 2026 year: 2020 ident: ref79 article-title: Utilizing camera traps, closed circuit cameras, and behavior observation software to monitor activity budgets, habitat use, and social interactions of zoo-housed Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10112026 – volume: 10 start-page: 1284869 year: 2023 ident: ref11 article-title: The agency domain and behavioral interactions: assessing positive animal welfare using the five domains model publication-title: Front Vet Sci. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1284869 – volume: 137 start-page: 74 year: 2012 ident: ref85 article-title: Assessing inactivity in zoo gorillas using keeper ratings and behavioral data publication-title: Appl Anim Behav Sci doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.001 – volume: 12 start-page: 3031 year: 2022 ident: ref75 article-title: Comparing data collection tools for zoo management decision-making: a case study examining behavioral measures of Humboldt penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) bond strength publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani12213031 – volume: 5 start-page: 323 year: 2018 ident: ref15 article-title: Animal welfare in conservation breeding: applications and challenges publication-title: Front Vet Sci. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00323 – volume: 53 start-page: 45 year: 2019 ident: ref95 article-title: The elephant welfare initiative: a model for advancing evidence-based zoo animal welfare monitoring, assessment and enhancement publication-title: Int Zoo Yb. doi: 10.1111/izy.12222 – volume: 25 start-page: 161 year: 2006 ident: ref41 article-title: Variation in nature: its implications for zoo elephant management publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.20087 – volume: 3 start-page: 116 year: 2010 ident: ref56 article-title: Daily routine of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in three management systems of Tamil Nadu, India and its implications for elephant welfare publication-title: J Sci Trans Environ Technov doi: 10.20894/STET.116.003.003.002 – volume: 18 start-page: 17 year: 1999 ident: ref82 article-title: Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in U.S. zoos: I. Individual behavior profiles and their relationship to breeding success publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)1 – volume: 27 start-page: 235 year: 2018 ident: ref101 article-title: A review of current indicators of welfare in captive elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus) publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.7120/09627286.27.3.235 – volume: 3 start-page: 1 year: 1998 ident: ref117 article-title: Captive elephant management in India under different systems: present trends publication-title: Zoos Print J – volume: 7 start-page: e6756 year: 2019 ident: ref63 article-title: Management factors affecting physical health and welfare of tourist camp elephants in Thailand publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.6756 – volume: 10 start-page: 1870 year: 2020 ident: ref10 article-title: The 2020 five domains model: including human-animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10101870 – volume: 11 start-page: e0154750 year: 2016 ident: ref111 article-title: Evaluation of demographics and social life events of Asian (Elephas maximus) and African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in north American zoos publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154750 – volume: 35 start-page: 48 year: 2005 ident: ref61 article-title: The elephant whisperer publication-title: Ecologist – volume: 40 start-page: 1 year: 2006 ident: ref27 article-title: A brief review of the status, distribution, and biology of wild Asian elephants Elephas maximus publication-title: Int Zoo Yearb doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00001.x – volume: 181 start-page: 143 year: 2017 ident: ref91 article-title: Adaptation of the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for monitoring animal welfare in zoological collections publication-title: Vet Rec doi: 10.1136/vr.104309 – volume: 10 start-page: 919 year: 2020 ident: ref97 article-title: Welfare assessment and activities of captive elephants in Thailand publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10060919 – volume: 17 start-page: 91 year: 2012 ident: ref40 article-title: Breeding management of captive Asian elephants in range countries and zoos publication-title: Jpn J Zoo Wildl Med doi: 10.5686/jjzwm.17.91 – volume: 92 start-page: 422 year: 2007 ident: ref109 article-title: A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis publication-title: Physiol Behav doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.018 – volume: 26 start-page: 26 year: 2013 ident: ref112 article-title: The effects of housing on zoo elephant behavior: a quantitative case study of diurnal and seasonal variation publication-title: Int J Comp Psychol doi: 10.46867/ijcp.2013.26.01.05 – volume: 9 start-page: 208 year: 2021 ident: ref92 article-title: Feasibility and validity of the animal welfare assessment grid to monitor the welfare of zoo-housed gorillas Gorilla gorilla gorilla publication-title: J Zoo Aquar Res doi: 10.19227/jzar.v9i4.607 – volume: 10 start-page: 1189 year: 2020 ident: ref73 article-title: Mapping shade availability and use in zoo environments: a tool for evaluating thermal comfort publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10071189 – volume-title: Animal welfare: limping towards Eden: a practical approach to redressing the problem of our dominion over the animals year: 2005 ident: ref7 article-title: Limping towards Eden: stepping stones – volume: 41 start-page: 292 year: 2022 ident: ref1 article-title: Differing animal welfare conceptions and what they mean for the future of zoos and aquariums, insights from an animal welfare audit publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.21677 – volume: 40 start-page: 9 year: 2021 ident: ref37 article-title: Increasing browse and social complexity can improve zoo elephant welfare publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.215753 – volume: 264 start-page: 105965 year: 2023 ident: ref89 article-title: Doing better for understudied species: evaluation and improvement of a species-general animal welfare assessment tool for zoos publication-title: Appl Anim Behav Sci doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105965 – volume: 7 start-page: 86 year: 2013 ident: ref106 article-title: Stress modulates intestinal secretory immunoglobulin a publication-title: Front Integr Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00086 – volume: 42 start-page: 371 year: 2023 ident: ref78 article-title: Effects of a modern exhibit design on captive tiger (Panthera tigris) welfare publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.21746 – volume: 10 start-page: 39 year: 2020 ident: ref102 article-title: Assessing the psychological priorities for optimizing captive Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) welfare publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10010039 – volume: 13 start-page: e0204965 year: 2018 ident: ref49 article-title: Body condition and adrenal glucocorticoid activity affects metabolic marker and lipid profiles in captive female elephants in Thailand publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204965 – volume: 19 start-page: 589 year: 2011 ident: ref65 article-title: Global regulations and local practices: the politics and governance of animal welfare in elephant tourism publication-title: J Sustain Tour doi: 10.1080/09669582.2011.566927 – year: 2023 ident: ref86 – year: 2013 ident: ref98 – volume: 38 start-page: 205 year: 2010 ident: ref90 article-title: The extended welfare assessment grid: a matrix for the assessment of welfare and cumulative suffering in experimental animals publication-title: Altern Lab Anim doi: 10.1177/026119291003800304 – volume: 19 start-page: 209 year: 2000 ident: ref34 article-title: Variation in stereotypic behavior related to restraint in circus elephants publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:3<209:AID-ZOO4>3.0.CO;2-7 – volume-title: The elephant tourism business year: 2021 ident: ref71 article-title: Validating a captive elephant welfare index doi: 10.1079/9781789245868.0019A – volume-title: Animal Welfare assessments year: 2023 ident: ref93 – volume: 6 start-page: 59 year: 2016 ident: ref8 article-title: Moving beyond the “five freedoms” by updating the “five provisions” and introducing aligned “animal Welfare aims” publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani6100059 – volume-title: Caring for wildlife: The world zoo and aquarium animal Welfare strategy year: 2015 ident: ref12 – volume-title: Improving the well-being of animals in the research environment year: 1994 ident: ref5 article-title: Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals – volume: 11 start-page: e0155146 year: 2016 ident: ref47 article-title: Assessment of body condition in African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants in north American zoos and management practices associated with high body condition scores publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155146 – volume-title: Report of the technical committee to enquire into the Welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems year: 1965 ident: ref6 – volume: 25 start-page: 395 year: 2016 ident: ref100 article-title: Using technology to monitor and improve zoo animal welfare publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.7120/09627286.25.4.395 – volume: 37 start-page: 36 year: 2022 ident: ref32 article-title: Assessing measures of animal welfare publication-title: Biol Philos doi: 10.1007/s10539-022-09862-1 – volume-title: The social welfare of captive elephants [doctoral thesis] year: 2021 ident: ref87 – volume-title: The ethics of captivity year: 2014 ident: ref57 article-title: Captive elephants doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977994.003.0004 – volume: 26 start-page: 959 year: 2013 ident: ref9 article-title: A critique of FAWC’s five freedoms as a framework for the analysis of animal welfare publication-title: J Agric Environ Ethics doi: 10.1007/s10806-012-9434-7 – volume: 8 start-page: 130 year: 2018 ident: ref67 article-title: An animal welfare risk assessment process for zoos publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani8080130 – volume: 243 start-page: 105456 year: 2021 ident: ref50 article-title: A survey of stereotypic behaviors in tourist camp elephants in Chiang Mai publication-title: Thailand Appl Anim Behav Sci doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105456 – volume-title: Asian elephant range states meeting, final report, 2017, Jakarta, Indonesia year: 2017 ident: ref116 – volume: 12 start-page: 1719 year: 2022 ident: ref103 article-title: A review of non-invasive sampling in wildlife disease and health research: what’s new? publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani12131719 – volume: 8 start-page: 111 year: 2018 ident: ref22 article-title: Using farm animal welfare protocols as a base to assess the welfare of wild animals in captivity—case study: dorcas gazelles (Gazella dorcas) publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani8070111 – volume: 10 start-page: 1132 year: 2020 ident: ref21 article-title: Welfare assessment for captive Anseriformes: a guide for practitioners and animal keepers publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10071132 – volume: 21 start-page: 11 year: 2012 ident: ref2 article-title: Animal welfare: a complex international public policy issue: economic, policy, societal, cultural and other drivers and constraints. A 20-year international perspective publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.1.3 – volume: 18 start-page: 335 year: 1999 ident: ref83 article-title: Behavioral differences as predictors of breeding status in captive cheetahs publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)18:4<335:AID-ZOO8>3.0.CO;2-X – volume: 28 start-page: 531 year: 2009 ident: ref33 article-title: Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.20276 – volume: 2 start-page: 301 year: 1993 ident: ref110 article-title: Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.1017/S0962728600016092 – volume: 19 start-page: 271 year: 2016 ident: ref36 article-title: A comparison of walking rates between wild and zoo African elephants (Loxodonta africana) publication-title: J Appl Anim Welf Sci doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1137755 – volume: 13 start-page: 1966 year: 2023 ident: ref24 article-title: Zoo animal welfare assessment: where do we stand? publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani13121966 – volume: 10 start-page: 2101 year: 2020 ident: ref94 article-title: Using zoo welfare assessments to identify common issues in developing country zoos publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10112101 – volume-title: Not commodities. Taken for a ride 2 year: 2020 ident: ref51 article-title: Elephants – volume: 23 start-page: 11 year: 2014 ident: ref96 article-title: Identification of major welfare issues for captive elephant husbandry by stakeholders publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.1.011 – volume: 10 start-page: 1303537 year: 2023 ident: ref114 article-title: Physiological changes in captive elephants in northern Thailand as a result of the COVID-19 tourism ban-muscle, liver, metabolic function, and body condition publication-title: Front Vet Sci. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1303537 – volume: 32 start-page: e62 year: 2023 ident: ref14 article-title: Rethinking the utility of the five domains model publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.84 – volume: 10 start-page: e0139092 year: 2015 ident: ref52 article-title: Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) and tiger (Panthera tigris) populations at tourism venues in Thailand and aspects of their welfare publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139092 – volume: 10 start-page: 1928 year: 2020 ident: ref107 article-title: Effect of tourist activities on fecal and salivary glucocorticoids and immunoglobulin in female captive Asian elephants in Thailand publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10101928 – volume: 7 start-page: 70 year: 2020 ident: ref77 article-title: Effects of habitat modifications on behavioral indicators of welfare for Madagascar giant hognose snakes (Leioheterodon madagascariensis) publication-title: Anim Behav Cogn. doi: 10.26451/abc.07.01.06.2020 – volume: 11 start-page: 3090 year: 2021 ident: ref84 article-title: Developing a reliable welfare assessment tool for captive hibernatory bear species publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani11113090 – volume-title: An elephant in the room: The science and well-being of elephants in captivity year: 2009 ident: ref59 article-title: Protected contact and elephant welfare – volume: 24 start-page: 267 year: 2015 ident: ref20 article-title: C-well: the development of a welfare assessment index for captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.3.267 – volume: 9 start-page: 170 year: 2022 ident: ref25 article-title: Welfare assessment tools in zoos: from theory to practice publication-title: Vet Sci doi: 10.3390/vetsci9040170 – volume: 3 start-page: cov030 year: 2015 ident: ref54 article-title: Stress and body condition are associated with climate and demography in Asian elephants publication-title: Conserv Physiol. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov030 – volume: 12 start-page: 33 year: 1977 ident: ref31 article-title: Feeding behaviour of the Asiatic elephant Elephas maximus in south-East Sri Lanka about conservation publication-title: Biol Conserv doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(77)90056-8 – volume-title: Gone astray: The care and Management of the Asian Elephant in domesticity year: 1997 ident: ref29 – volume: 13 start-page: 2595 year: 2023 ident: ref76 article-title: Behavioral welfare research for the management of sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani13162595 – volume: 28 start-page: 507 year: 2009 ident: ref3 article-title: Assessing animal welfare: different philosophies, different scientific approaches publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.20253 – volume: 39 start-page: 148 year: 2008 ident: ref55 article-title: A visual health assessment of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) housed in India publication-title: J Zoo Wildl Med doi: 10.1638/2007-0008R1.1 – volume-title: Identification of an effective and robust model of elephant keeping and keeper welfare; insights based on the activity budget of elephants in captivity and mahout-elephant interaction in Karnataka year: 2008 ident: ref118 – volume-title: Taken for a ride: The conditions for elephants used in tourism in Asia, 2017 year: 2017 ident: ref53 – volume: 17 start-page: 311 year: 1998 ident: ref39 article-title: Captive breeding and infant mortality in Asian elephants Elephas maximus: a comparison between twenty western zoos and three eastern elephant centers publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1998)17:4<311:AID-ZOO5>3.0.CO;2-C – volume: 42 start-page: 328 year: 2023 ident: ref88 article-title: The historical development of zoo elephant survivorship publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.21733 – volume-title: A review of the Welfare of zoo elephants in Europe year: 2002 ident: ref38 – volume: 8 start-page: 110 year: 2018 ident: ref26 article-title: Assessment of welfare in zoo animals: towards optimum quality of life publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani8070110 – volume: 24 start-page: 272 year: 2021 ident: ref18 article-title: The use of a species-specific health and welfare assessment tool for the giant pacific octopus, Enteroctopus dofleini publication-title: J Appl Anim Welf Sci doi: 10.1080/10888705.2020.1809412 – volume-title: The Welfare, housing and husbandry of elephants in UK zoos year: 2008 ident: ref43 – year: 2019 ident: ref13 – volume: 18 start-page: S1 year: 2015 ident: ref17 article-title: A universal animal welfare framework for zoos publication-title: J Appl Anim Welf Sci doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1075830 – volume: 7 start-page: coy077 year: 2019 ident: ref108 article-title: The development of an immunoassay to measure immunoglobulin in Asian elephant feces, saliva, urine, and serum as a potential biomarker of well-being publication-title: Conserv Physiol doi: 10.1093/conphyscoy077 – volume: 24 start-page: 139 year: 2015 ident: ref69 article-title: Refinement of welfare through the development of a quantitative system for assessment of lifetime experience publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.2.139 – volume: 40 start-page: 63 year: 2006 ident: ref30 article-title: Concepts in the care and welfare of captive elephants publication-title: Int Zoo Yearb. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00063.x – volume: 29 start-page: 256 year: 2010 ident: ref44 article-title: What do population-level welfare indices suggest about the well-being of zoo elephants? publication-title: Zoo Biol doi: 10.1002/zoo.20303 – volume: 12 start-page: 445 year: 2003 ident: ref4 article-title: Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: transparency in the food product quality chain publication-title: Anim Welf doi: 10.1017/S096272860002604X – volume: 6 start-page: 158 year: 2019 ident: ref72 article-title: Monitoring the behavior and habitat use of animals to enhance welfare using the ZooMonitor app publication-title: Anim Behav Cogn doi: 10.26451/abc.06.03.01.2019 – volume: 11 start-page: e0155223 year: 2016 ident: ref46 article-title: Housing and demographic risk factors impacting foot and musculoskeletal health in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in north American zoos publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155223 – volume: 10 start-page: 737 year: 2020 ident: ref62 article-title: Commonalities in management and husbandry factors important for health and welfare of captive elephants in North America and Thailand publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10040737 – year: 2017 ident: ref66 – volume: 102 start-page: 55 year: 2018 ident: ref105 article-title: Linking stress and immunity: immunoglobulin as a non-invasive physiological biomarker in animal welfare studies publication-title: Horm Behav doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.04.011 – volume: 23 start-page: 164 year: 2020 ident: ref64 article-title: Elephant tourism in Thailand: a review of animal welfare practices and needs publication-title: J Appl Anim Welf Sci doi: 10.1080/10888705.2019.1569522 – volume: 156 start-page: 83 year: 2018 ident: ref16 article-title: The 24/7 approach to promoting optimal welfare for captive wild animals publication-title: Behav Process doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.010 – volume: 14 start-page: e0210783 year: 2019 ident: ref23 article-title: Development of a behavioural welfare assessment tool for routine use with captive elephants publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210783 – volume: 9 start-page: 1033821 year: 2022 ident: ref70 article-title: Ackonc-AWA: a multi-species animal welfare assessment protocol for wild animals under human care to overcome the use of generic welfare checklists publication-title: Front Vet Sci doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1033821 – volume: 176 start-page: 259 year: 2012 ident: ref113 article-title: Seasonal rhythms of salivary cortisol secretion in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) publication-title: Gen Comp Endocrinol doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.02.001 – volume: 11 start-page: e0145673 year: 2016 ident: ref45 article-title: Reproductive health assessment of female elephants in north American zoos and association of husbandry practices with reproductive dysfunction in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145673 |
SSID | ssj0001547380 |
Score | 2.2845051 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1370909 |
SubjectTerms | animal welfare captive elephant framework tourist camp Veterinary Science welfare assessment zoo |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQlNdCqYzEDYXGr3XCra1aVUjlRFFv1jgZqystyaqbwon_3rGdjXZRBReuGVt2PDOeGXnmG8Y-tKH2whtSJDI_hUZDOldBVWgjg6xwDlUqH7v8Or-40l-uzfVWq6-YE5bhgfPBHWlTlxCkMqClhrkFUkjvA0AZpME64XySzdsKpnJ9sLaqKnOVDEVh9VH4iUOE55b6k1C2rGMG4pYlSoD9D3mZfyZLblmf86fsyeg28uO83WfsEXb7bP97zGVJBbX8cnwjf85-n06tBXkfOHSLHzTzFy4D3CKHCYmTD32_XBO95bmNdLoGcf2Zd2TRODmzROM534OuRL5BH0-UBlbpIxmt1U1MpeGLjh-vF_CCXZ2ffTu9KMYmC0VDkfFQkAJXqCQYS-YySLAxo09gU7bkWJFyNtaAlMG0qqEItvVCg4nFuArJ9SlNo16yva7v8DXj4MvWIPFbeKlVZbxBC1pgLSRqC2HGxObAXTMikMdGGEtHkUhkkktMcpFJbmTSjH2c5qwy_sZfR59EPk4jI3Z2-kAS5UaJcv-SqBl7v5ECR7oWH1Cgw_5u7VQCSCQnjRZ6laViWor-V0m63Gas2pGXnb3sUrrFTcLzFhRG6rq0b_7H7t-yx_FEYpqckAdsb7i9w3fkNw3-MKnIPeNDGZg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38532794 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3003440669 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10964907 https://doaj.org/article/4590af235a424a67aaddbbfaa0f25e93 |
Volume | 11 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELaqcuGCoLwWaGUkbiglfq0TpAqViqpCWk4s6s2aJGO60jZZNimPQ_97x042YlFB4hg775nxN5PMfMPYq8rnhSgMGRLBT6LRkM1lkCXaSC8znEIWy8dmn6Znc_3x3JzvsE27o-EFtreGdqGf1Hy9PPz57dc7MvijEHES3r7x37ELzNtSHwpl0zzU890hZLKho8FscPf7qmFtVWymJmUeuRHzvo7mL6fZwqpI6X-bH_pnOuVv-HR6n90bHEt-3GvCA7aD9R7b-xKyXWLJLZ8Nf9EfsuuTsfkgbzyHenFJR_7ApYc1chi5OnnXNMuW5iveN5qOCyW2b3lNmMfJ3aU53meE0KLJN_zkcaaEVRwkWFtdhGQbvqj5cbuAR2x--uHzyVkytGFISoqdu4RMPEMlwVgCVC_Bhpw_gWVaketF5ltaA1J6U6mSYtyqEBpMKNdVSBJITakes926qfEp41CklUHSCFFIrTJTGLSgBeZCorbgJ0xsXrgrB47y0Cpj6ShWCUJyUUguCMkNQpqw1-Mxq56h4597vw9yHPcM7NpxoFl_dYOxOm3yFLxUBrTUMLVAIFAUHiD10mCuJuzlRgscWWP4xQI1NletU5FCkdw4utCTXivGS9HzKknL34RlW_qydS_bM_XiIjJ-Cwo0dZ7aZ__1rM_Z3bAZMuaEfMF2u_UV7pML1RUH8dPDQbSOG4rgG5Q |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+animal+welfare+assessment+tools+and+methodologies%3A+need+for+an+effective+approach+for+captive+elephants+in+Asia&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+veterinary+science&rft.au=Ghimire%2C+Raman&rft.au=Brown%2C+Janine+L.&rft.au=Thitaram%2C+Chatchote&rft.au=Bansiddhi%2C+Pakkanut&rft.date=2024-03-12&rft.issn=2297-1769&rft.eissn=2297-1769&rft.volume=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffvets.2024.1370909&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3389_fvets_2024_1370909 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2297-1769&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2297-1769&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2297-1769&client=summon |