Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia

Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, loggi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in veterinary science Vol. 11; p. 1370909
Main Authors Ghimire, Raman, Brown, Janine L., Thitaram, Chatchote, Bansiddhi, Pakkanut
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 12.03.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia.
AbstractList Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia.
Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia.
Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia.Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia.
Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there is an urgent need for comprehensive, globally coordinated efforts for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that participate in religious, logging, or tourist activities in range countries where the majority reside, and where welfare issues have been identified but not addressed. This review provides a comparative analysis of available animal assessment tools. Each offers distinct features for assessment that allow institutions to select criteria for specific needs and available resources. Most are applied to general animal welfare assessments, although some are tailored to particular species, including elephants. The tools span diverse formats, from digital to primarily paper-based assessments. Assessments operate at individual and institutional levels and across multiple welfare domains. Methodologies rely on keeper ratings or expert evaluations, incorporate numerical scoring and Likert scales for welfare grading, and encompass inputs including behaviors, health, and physiological indicators. For tourist camp elephants, one challenge is that the tools were developed in zoos, which may or may not have application to non-zoological settings. Digital tools and assessment methodologies such as keeper ratings face logistical challenges when applied across tourist venues. As with any tool, reliability, validity, and repeatability are essential and must address the unique welfare challenges of diverse captive settings. We propose that a holistic, context-specific, evidence-based, and practical tool be developed to ensure high elephant welfare standards in non-zoological facilities throughout Asia.
Author Thitaram, Chatchote
Ghimire, Raman
Brown, Janine L.
Bansiddhi, Pakkanut
AuthorAffiliation 1 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai , Thailand
2 Center of Elephant and Wildlife Health, Chiang Mai University Animal Hospital , Chiang Mai , Thailand
3 Elephant, Wildlife, and Companion Animals Research Group, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai , Thailand
4 Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute , Front Royal, VA , United States
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai , Thailand
– name: 3 Elephant, Wildlife, and Companion Animals Research Group, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai , Thailand
– name: 2 Center of Elephant and Wildlife Health, Chiang Mai University Animal Hospital , Chiang Mai , Thailand
– name: 4 Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute , Front Royal, VA , United States
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Raman
  surname: Ghimire
  fullname: Ghimire, Raman
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Janine L.
  surname: Brown
  fullname: Brown, Janine L.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Chatchote
  surname: Thitaram
  fullname: Thitaram, Chatchote
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Pakkanut
  surname: Bansiddhi
  fullname: Bansiddhi, Pakkanut
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38532794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kjtvFDEUhUcoiISQP0CBXNLs4vFjPKZBUcQjUiQaqK27nutdR57xYHsXUfDf8T6CEgoqWz73fEe2z8vmbIoTNs3rli457_U7t8OSl4wysWy5oprqZ80FY1otWtXps0f78-Yq53tKaSuF4j190ZzzXnKmtLhoft_EcYbkc5xIdAQmP0IgPzE4SEggZ8x5xKmQEmPIVR_IiGUThxji2mN-TybEgbiYqkbQObTF76pznlMEuzkoFubDIQacNzCVTPxErrOHV81zByHj1Wm9bL5_-vjt5svi7uvn25vru4UVnS4L0fc9cgZSWUTHQLVa8xYtHbqWdry3SgJjTg7cUqaGVStAaiU5x1YxKi2_bG6P3CHCvZlTvWT6ZSJ4cziIaW0gFW8DGiE1Bce4BMEEdApgGFYrB0Adk6h5ZX04subtasTB1sdJEJ5AnyqT35h13JmW6k5oqirh7YmQ4o8t5mJGny2GABPGbTacUi4E7TpdR988Dvub8vCBdaA_DtgUc07ojPUFio_7bB9qqNnXxRzqYvZ1Mae6VCv7x_pA_4_pD9Fhxoo
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2024_1459560
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_18161
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_18370
crossref_primary_10_3390_jzbg5040051
Cites_doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0144276
10.7717/peerj.5996
10.20506/rst.24.2.1594
10.14202/vetworld.2022.647-654
10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.009
10.1111/izy.12247
10.1126/science.1164298
10.1002/zoo.20281
10.1002/zoo.20260
10.3390/ani9060326
10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105453
10.3390/ani9010027
10.3390/ani10112026
10.3389/fvets.2023.1284869
10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.001
10.3390/ani12213031
10.3389/fvets.2018.00323
10.1111/izy.12222
10.1002/zoo.20087
10.20894/STET.116.003.003.002
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)1
10.7120/09627286.27.3.235
10.7717/peerj.6756
10.3390/ani10101870
10.1371/journal.pone.0154750
10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00001.x
10.1136/vr.104309
10.3390/ani10060919
10.5686/jjzwm.17.91
10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.018
10.46867/ijcp.2013.26.01.05
10.19227/jzar.v9i4.607
10.3390/ani10071189
10.1002/zoo.21677
10.1002/zoo.215753
10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105965
10.3389/fnint.2013.00086
10.1002/zoo.21746
10.3390/ani10010039
10.1371/journal.pone.0204965
10.1080/09669582.2011.566927
10.1177/026119291003800304
10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:3<209:AID-ZOO4>3.0.CO;2-7
10.1079/9781789245868.0019A
10.3390/ani6100059
10.1371/journal.pone.0155146
10.7120/09627286.25.4.395
10.1007/s10539-022-09862-1
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977994.003.0004
10.1007/s10806-012-9434-7
10.3390/ani8080130
10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105456
10.3390/ani12131719
10.3390/ani8070111
10.3390/ani10071132
10.3138/jvme.37.1.3
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)18:4<335:AID-ZOO8>3.0.CO;2-X
10.1002/zoo.20276
10.1017/S0962728600016092
10.1080/10888705.2015.1137755
10.3390/ani13121966
10.3390/ani10112101
10.7120/09627286.23.1.011
10.3389/fvets.2023.1303537
10.1017/awf.2023.84
10.1371/journal.pone.0139092
10.3390/ani10101928
10.26451/abc.07.01.06.2020
10.3390/ani11113090
10.7120/09627286.24.3.267
10.3390/vetsci9040170
10.1093/conphys/cov030
10.1016/0006-3207(77)90056-8
10.3390/ani13162595
10.1002/zoo.20253
10.1638/2007-0008R1.1
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1998)17:4<311:AID-ZOO5>3.0.CO;2-C
10.1002/zoo.21733
10.3390/ani8070110
10.1080/10888705.2020.1809412
10.1080/10888705.2015.1075830
10.1093/conphyscoy077
10.7120/09627286.24.2.139
10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00063.x
10.1002/zoo.20303
10.1017/S096272860002604X
10.26451/abc.06.03.01.2019
10.1371/journal.pone.0155223
10.3390/ani10040737
10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.04.011
10.1080/10888705.2019.1569522
10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.010
10.1371/journal.pone.0210783
10.3389/fvets.2022.1033821
10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.02.001
10.1371/journal.pone.0145673
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi.
Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi. 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi.
– notice: Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi. 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2024.1370909
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Veterinary Medicine
EISSN 2297-1769
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_4590af235a424a67aaddbbfaa0f25e93
PMC10964907
38532794
10_3389_fvets_2024_1370909
Genre Journal Article
Review
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
9T4
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ACGFS
ACXDI
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BCNDV
CITATION
ECGQY
EYRJQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
KQ8
M48
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
IAG
IAO
IEA
IPNFZ
NPM
RIG
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-4888e32a57ceef2a719931ec0d610638c75a22f5d3c027db14a597533e17205c3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2297-1769
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:29 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:35:40 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:43:20 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:37:23 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:03 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:24:02 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords tourist camp
welfare assessment
framework
zoo
animal welfare
captive elephant
Language English
License Copyright © 2024 Ghimire, Brown, Thitaram and Bansiddhi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c469t-4888e32a57ceef2a719931ec0d610638c75a22f5d3c027db14a597533e17205c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Chase A. LaDue, Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden, United States
Reviewed by: Paul Rose, University of Exeter, United Kingdom
Edited by: Edward Narayan, The University of Queensland, Australia
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3389/fvets.2024.1370909
PMID 38532794
PQID 3003440669
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4590af235a424a67aaddbbfaa0f25e93
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10964907
proquest_miscellaneous_3003440669
pubmed_primary_38532794
crossref_citationtrail_10_3389_fvets_2024_1370909
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2024_1370909
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-03-12
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-03-12
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-03-12
  day: 12
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Frontiers in veterinary science
PublicationTitleAlternate Front Vet Sci
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Frontiers Media S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Media S.A
References Wark (ref73) 2020; 10
Campos-Rodríguez (ref106) 2013; 7
Veasey (ref30) 2006; 40
(ref86) 2023
Tallo-Parra (ref24) 2023; 13
Hill (ref33) 2009; 28
Fazio (ref79) 2020; 10
Littlewood (ref11) 2023; 10
Lair (ref29) 1997
Clubb (ref38) 2002
Harris (ref43) 2008
(ref13) 2019
Whitham (ref100) 2016; 25
Sukumar (ref27) 2006; 40
Gurusamy (ref96) 2014; 23
(ref66) 2017
Duffy (ref65) 2011; 19
Menon (ref58) 2019; 53
Mellor (ref12) 2015
Taylor (ref39) 1998; 17
Veasey (ref102) 2020; 10
Caporale (ref115) 2005; 24
Holst (ref18) 2021; 24
Greco (ref35) 2016; 11
Edwards (ref108) 2019; 7
(ref93) 2023
Saiyed (ref74) 2019; 9
Vanitha (ref56) 2010; 3
Spain (ref77) 2020; 7
Thitaram (ref40) 2012; 17
Brown (ref45) 2016; 11
Wark (ref72) 2019; 6
Jones (ref25) 2022; 9
Korte (ref109) 2007; 92
O’Brien (ref89) 2023; 264
Staley (ref105) 2018; 102
Hutchins (ref41) 2006; 25
Honess (ref90) 2010; 38
Miller (ref46) 2016; 11
Fraser (ref3) 2009; 28
Meehan (ref95) 2019; 53
Brambell (ref6) 1965
Carlstead (ref82) 1999; 18
Bansiddhi (ref60) 2018; 6
Vancuylenberg (ref31) 1977; 12
Hampton (ref14) 2023; 32
Laule (ref59) 2009
Fuktong (ref50) 2021; 243
Browning (ref32) 2022; 37
Brown (ref62) 2020; 10
Mason (ref110) 1993; 2
Bayvel (ref2) 2012; 21
Miller (ref36) 2016; 19
Mumby (ref54) 2015; 3
Eden (ref7) 2005
Varma (ref118) 2008
Blokhuis (ref4) 2003; 12
Schmidt-Burbach (ref52) 2015; 10
Rose (ref21) 2020; 10
Schmidt-Burbach (ref53) 2017
Racciatti (ref70) 2022; 9
ref99
Nokkaew (ref48) 2022; 15
Gruber (ref34) 2000; 19
Maher (ref84) 2021; 11
Lasky (ref37) 2021; 40
Benn (ref19) 2019; 9
Clubb (ref42) 2008; 322
Mason (ref44) 2010; 29
Less (ref85) 2012; 137
McCulloch (ref9) 2013; 26
(ref116) 2017
Sukumar (ref28) 1992
Fultz (ref76) 2023; 13
Mellor (ref5) 1994
Ward (ref94) 2020; 10
Williams (ref101) 2018; 27
Krishnamurthy (ref117) 1998; 3
Brando (ref16) 2018; 156
Mellor (ref8) 2016; 6
Gurusamy (ref71) 2021
Salas (ref22) 2018; 8
Kosaruk (ref107) 2020; 10
Wazara (ref87) 2021
Bansiddhi (ref63) 2019; 7
Borger-Turner (ref20) 2015; 24
Greggor (ref15) 2018; 5
Huskisson (ref80) 2021; 243
Whitham (ref81) 2009; 28
Mellor (ref10) 2020; 10
Bansiddhi (ref97) 2020; 10
Bansiddhi (ref64) 2020; 23
Schilling (ref103) 2022; 12
Norkaew (ref49) 2018; 13
Kagan (ref17) 2015; 18
Menargues Marcilla (ref113) 2012; 176
Doyle (ref57) 2014
Wolfensohn (ref26) 2018; 8
King (ref61) 2005; 35
Schmidt-Burbach (ref51) 2020
Yon (ref23) 2019; 14
Yeates (ref104) 2008; 175
Morfeld (ref47) 2016; 11
Wielebnowski (ref83) 1999; 18
Prado-Oviedo (ref111) 2016; 11
Smith (ref78) 2023; 42
Supanta (ref114) 2023; 10
Sherwen (ref67) 2018; 8
Justice (ref91) 2017; 181
(ref98) 2013
Galante (ref75) 2022; 12
Brouwers (ref92) 2021; 9
Veasey (ref1) 2022; 41
Wolfensohn (ref69) 2015; 24
Scherer (ref88) 2023; 42
Posta (ref112) 2013; 26
Ramanathan (ref55) 2008; 39
Barber (ref68) 2009; 28
References_xml – volume: 11
  start-page: e0144276
  year: 2016
  ident: ref35
  article-title: The days and nights of zoo elephants: using epidemiology to better understand stereotypic behavior of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in north American zoos
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144276
– volume: 6
  start-page: e5996
  year: 2018
  ident: ref60
  article-title: Changing trends in elephant camp management in northern Thailand and implications for welfare
  publication-title: PeerJ
  doi: 10.7717/peerj.5996
– volume: 24
  start-page: 567
  year: 2005
  ident: ref115
  article-title: Global perspectives on animal welfare: Europe
  publication-title: Rev Sci Tech
  doi: 10.20506/rst.24.2.1594
– volume-title: The Asian elephant: Ecology and management
  year: 1992
  ident: ref28
– volume: 15
  start-page: 647
  year: 2022
  ident: ref48
  article-title: Study of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in captive Asian elephants Elephas maximus in Kanchanaburi Province
  publication-title: Thailand Vet World
  doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.647-654
– volume: 175
  start-page: 293
  year: 2008
  ident: ref104
  article-title: Assessment of positive welfare: a review
  publication-title: Vet J
  doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.009
– volume: 53
  start-page: 17
  year: 2019
  ident: ref58
  article-title: Population status of Asian elephants Elephas maximus and key threats
  publication-title: Int Zoo Yb
  doi: 10.1111/izy.12247
– ident: ref99
– volume: 322
  start-page: 1649
  year: 2008
  ident: ref42
  article-title: Compromised survivorship in zoo elephants
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1164298
– volume: 28
  start-page: 545
  year: 2009
  ident: ref81
  article-title: Animal-based welfare monitoring: using keeper ratings as an assessment tool
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.20281
– volume: 28
  start-page: 519
  year: 2009
  ident: ref68
  article-title: Programmatic approaches to assessing and improving animal welfare in zoos and aquariums
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.20260
– volume: 9
  start-page: 326
  year: 2019
  ident: ref74
  article-title: Evaluating the behavior and temperament of African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) in a non-contact animal encounter program
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani9060326
– volume: 243
  start-page: 105453
  year: 2021
  ident: ref80
  article-title: Assessing the potential impact of zoo visitors on the welfare and cognitive performance of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata)
  publication-title: Appl Anim Behav Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105453
– volume: 9
  start-page: 27
  year: 2019
  ident: ref19
  article-title: A review of welfare assessment methods in reptiles, and preliminary application of the Welfare quality® protocol to the pygmy blue-tongue skink, Tiliqua adelaidensis, using animal-based measures
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani9010027
– volume: 10
  start-page: 2026
  year: 2020
  ident: ref79
  article-title: Utilizing camera traps, closed circuit cameras, and behavior observation software to monitor activity budgets, habitat use, and social interactions of zoo-housed Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10112026
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1284869
  year: 2023
  ident: ref11
  article-title: The agency domain and behavioral interactions: assessing positive animal welfare using the five domains model
  publication-title: Front Vet Sci.
  doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1284869
– volume: 137
  start-page: 74
  year: 2012
  ident: ref85
  article-title: Assessing inactivity in zoo gorillas using keeper ratings and behavioral data
  publication-title: Appl Anim Behav Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.001
– volume: 12
  start-page: 3031
  year: 2022
  ident: ref75
  article-title: Comparing data collection tools for zoo management decision-making: a case study examining behavioral measures of Humboldt penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) bond strength
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani12213031
– volume: 5
  start-page: 323
  year: 2018
  ident: ref15
  article-title: Animal welfare in conservation breeding: applications and challenges
  publication-title: Front Vet Sci.
  doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00323
– volume: 53
  start-page: 45
  year: 2019
  ident: ref95
  article-title: The elephant welfare initiative: a model for advancing evidence-based zoo animal welfare monitoring, assessment and enhancement
  publication-title: Int Zoo Yb.
  doi: 10.1111/izy.12222
– volume: 25
  start-page: 161
  year: 2006
  ident: ref41
  article-title: Variation in nature: its implications for zoo elephant management
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.20087
– volume: 3
  start-page: 116
  year: 2010
  ident: ref56
  article-title: Daily routine of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in three management systems of Tamil Nadu, India and its implications for elephant welfare
  publication-title: J Sci Trans Environ Technov
  doi: 10.20894/STET.116.003.003.002
– volume: 18
  start-page: 17
  year: 1999
  ident: ref82
  article-title: Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in U.S. zoos: I. Individual behavior profiles and their relationship to breeding success
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)1
– volume: 27
  start-page: 235
  year: 2018
  ident: ref101
  article-title: A review of current indicators of welfare in captive elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus)
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.7120/09627286.27.3.235
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1
  year: 1998
  ident: ref117
  article-title: Captive elephant management in India under different systems: present trends
  publication-title: Zoos Print J
– volume: 7
  start-page: e6756
  year: 2019
  ident: ref63
  article-title: Management factors affecting physical health and welfare of tourist camp elephants in Thailand
  publication-title: PeerJ
  doi: 10.7717/peerj.6756
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1870
  year: 2020
  ident: ref10
  article-title: The 2020 five domains model: including human-animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10101870
– volume: 11
  start-page: e0154750
  year: 2016
  ident: ref111
  article-title: Evaluation of demographics and social life events of Asian (Elephas maximus) and African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in north American zoos
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154750
– volume: 35
  start-page: 48
  year: 2005
  ident: ref61
  article-title: The elephant whisperer
  publication-title: Ecologist
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: ref27
  article-title: A brief review of the status, distribution, and biology of wild Asian elephants Elephas maximus
  publication-title: Int Zoo Yearb
  doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00001.x
– volume: 181
  start-page: 143
  year: 2017
  ident: ref91
  article-title: Adaptation of the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for monitoring animal welfare in zoological collections
  publication-title: Vet Rec
  doi: 10.1136/vr.104309
– volume: 10
  start-page: 919
  year: 2020
  ident: ref97
  article-title: Welfare assessment and activities of captive elephants in Thailand
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10060919
– volume: 17
  start-page: 91
  year: 2012
  ident: ref40
  article-title: Breeding management of captive Asian elephants in range countries and zoos
  publication-title: Jpn J Zoo Wildl Med
  doi: 10.5686/jjzwm.17.91
– volume: 92
  start-page: 422
  year: 2007
  ident: ref109
  article-title: A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis
  publication-title: Physiol Behav
  doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.018
– volume: 26
  start-page: 26
  year: 2013
  ident: ref112
  article-title: The effects of housing on zoo elephant behavior: a quantitative case study of diurnal and seasonal variation
  publication-title: Int J Comp Psychol
  doi: 10.46867/ijcp.2013.26.01.05
– volume: 9
  start-page: 208
  year: 2021
  ident: ref92
  article-title: Feasibility and validity of the animal welfare assessment grid to monitor the welfare of zoo-housed gorillas Gorilla gorilla gorilla
  publication-title: J Zoo Aquar Res
  doi: 10.19227/jzar.v9i4.607
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1189
  year: 2020
  ident: ref73
  article-title: Mapping shade availability and use in zoo environments: a tool for evaluating thermal comfort
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10071189
– volume-title: Animal welfare: limping towards Eden: a practical approach to redressing the problem of our dominion over the animals
  year: 2005
  ident: ref7
  article-title: Limping towards Eden: stepping stones
– volume: 41
  start-page: 292
  year: 2022
  ident: ref1
  article-title: Differing animal welfare conceptions and what they mean for the future of zoos and aquariums, insights from an animal welfare audit
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.21677
– volume: 40
  start-page: 9
  year: 2021
  ident: ref37
  article-title: Increasing browse and social complexity can improve zoo elephant welfare
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.215753
– volume: 264
  start-page: 105965
  year: 2023
  ident: ref89
  article-title: Doing better for understudied species: evaluation and improvement of a species-general animal welfare assessment tool for zoos
  publication-title: Appl Anim Behav Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105965
– volume: 7
  start-page: 86
  year: 2013
  ident: ref106
  article-title: Stress modulates intestinal secretory immunoglobulin a
  publication-title: Front Integr Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00086
– volume: 42
  start-page: 371
  year: 2023
  ident: ref78
  article-title: Effects of a modern exhibit design on captive tiger (Panthera tigris) welfare
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.21746
– volume: 10
  start-page: 39
  year: 2020
  ident: ref102
  article-title: Assessing the psychological priorities for optimizing captive Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) welfare
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10010039
– volume: 13
  start-page: e0204965
  year: 2018
  ident: ref49
  article-title: Body condition and adrenal glucocorticoid activity affects metabolic marker and lipid profiles in captive female elephants in Thailand
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204965
– volume: 19
  start-page: 589
  year: 2011
  ident: ref65
  article-title: Global regulations and local practices: the politics and governance of animal welfare in elephant tourism
  publication-title: J Sustain Tour
  doi: 10.1080/09669582.2011.566927
– year: 2023
  ident: ref86
– year: 2013
  ident: ref98
– volume: 38
  start-page: 205
  year: 2010
  ident: ref90
  article-title: The extended welfare assessment grid: a matrix for the assessment of welfare and cumulative suffering in experimental animals
  publication-title: Altern Lab Anim
  doi: 10.1177/026119291003800304
– volume: 19
  start-page: 209
  year: 2000
  ident: ref34
  article-title: Variation in stereotypic behavior related to restraint in circus elephants
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:3<209:AID-ZOO4>3.0.CO;2-7
– volume-title: The elephant tourism business
  year: 2021
  ident: ref71
  article-title: Validating a captive elephant welfare index
  doi: 10.1079/9781789245868.0019A
– volume-title: Animal Welfare assessments
  year: 2023
  ident: ref93
– volume: 6
  start-page: 59
  year: 2016
  ident: ref8
  article-title: Moving beyond the “five freedoms” by updating the “five provisions” and introducing aligned “animal Welfare aims”
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani6100059
– volume-title: Caring for wildlife: The world zoo and aquarium animal Welfare strategy
  year: 2015
  ident: ref12
– volume-title: Improving the well-being of animals in the research environment
  year: 1994
  ident: ref5
  article-title: Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals
– volume: 11
  start-page: e0155146
  year: 2016
  ident: ref47
  article-title: Assessment of body condition in African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants in north American zoos and management practices associated with high body condition scores
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155146
– volume-title: Report of the technical committee to enquire into the Welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems
  year: 1965
  ident: ref6
– volume: 25
  start-page: 395
  year: 2016
  ident: ref100
  article-title: Using technology to monitor and improve zoo animal welfare
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.7120/09627286.25.4.395
– volume: 37
  start-page: 36
  year: 2022
  ident: ref32
  article-title: Assessing measures of animal welfare
  publication-title: Biol Philos
  doi: 10.1007/s10539-022-09862-1
– volume-title: The social welfare of captive elephants [doctoral thesis]
  year: 2021
  ident: ref87
– volume-title: The ethics of captivity
  year: 2014
  ident: ref57
  article-title: Captive elephants
  doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977994.003.0004
– volume: 26
  start-page: 959
  year: 2013
  ident: ref9
  article-title: A critique of FAWC’s five freedoms as a framework for the analysis of animal welfare
  publication-title: J Agric Environ Ethics
  doi: 10.1007/s10806-012-9434-7
– volume: 8
  start-page: 130
  year: 2018
  ident: ref67
  article-title: An animal welfare risk assessment process for zoos
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani8080130
– volume: 243
  start-page: 105456
  year: 2021
  ident: ref50
  article-title: A survey of stereotypic behaviors in tourist camp elephants in Chiang Mai
  publication-title: Thailand Appl Anim Behav Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105456
– volume-title: Asian elephant range states meeting, final report, 2017, Jakarta, Indonesia
  year: 2017
  ident: ref116
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1719
  year: 2022
  ident: ref103
  article-title: A review of non-invasive sampling in wildlife disease and health research: what’s new?
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani12131719
– volume: 8
  start-page: 111
  year: 2018
  ident: ref22
  article-title: Using farm animal welfare protocols as a base to assess the welfare of wild animals in captivity—case study: dorcas gazelles (Gazella dorcas)
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani8070111
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1132
  year: 2020
  ident: ref21
  article-title: Welfare assessment for captive Anseriformes: a guide for practitioners and animal keepers
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10071132
– volume: 21
  start-page: 11
  year: 2012
  ident: ref2
  article-title: Animal welfare: a complex international public policy issue: economic, policy, societal, cultural and other drivers and constraints. A 20-year international perspective
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.1.3
– volume: 18
  start-page: 335
  year: 1999
  ident: ref83
  article-title: Behavioral differences as predictors of breeding status in captive cheetahs
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)18:4<335:AID-ZOO8>3.0.CO;2-X
– volume: 28
  start-page: 531
  year: 2009
  ident: ref33
  article-title: Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.20276
– volume: 2
  start-page: 301
  year: 1993
  ident: ref110
  article-title: Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare?
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.1017/S0962728600016092
– volume: 19
  start-page: 271
  year: 2016
  ident: ref36
  article-title: A comparison of walking rates between wild and zoo African elephants (Loxodonta africana)
  publication-title: J Appl Anim Welf Sci
  doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1137755
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1966
  year: 2023
  ident: ref24
  article-title: Zoo animal welfare assessment: where do we stand?
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani13121966
– volume: 10
  start-page: 2101
  year: 2020
  ident: ref94
  article-title: Using zoo welfare assessments to identify common issues in developing country zoos
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10112101
– volume-title: Not commodities. Taken for a ride 2
  year: 2020
  ident: ref51
  article-title: Elephants
– volume: 23
  start-page: 11
  year: 2014
  ident: ref96
  article-title: Identification of major welfare issues for captive elephant husbandry by stakeholders
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.1.011
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1303537
  year: 2023
  ident: ref114
  article-title: Physiological changes in captive elephants in northern Thailand as a result of the COVID-19 tourism ban-muscle, liver, metabolic function, and body condition
  publication-title: Front Vet Sci.
  doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1303537
– volume: 32
  start-page: e62
  year: 2023
  ident: ref14
  article-title: Rethinking the utility of the five domains model
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.84
– volume: 10
  start-page: e0139092
  year: 2015
  ident: ref52
  article-title: Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) and tiger (Panthera tigris) populations at tourism venues in Thailand and aspects of their welfare
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139092
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1928
  year: 2020
  ident: ref107
  article-title: Effect of tourist activities on fecal and salivary glucocorticoids and immunoglobulin in female captive Asian elephants in Thailand
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10101928
– volume: 7
  start-page: 70
  year: 2020
  ident: ref77
  article-title: Effects of habitat modifications on behavioral indicators of welfare for Madagascar giant hognose snakes (Leioheterodon madagascariensis)
  publication-title: Anim Behav Cogn.
  doi: 10.26451/abc.07.01.06.2020
– volume: 11
  start-page: 3090
  year: 2021
  ident: ref84
  article-title: Developing a reliable welfare assessment tool for captive hibernatory bear species
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani11113090
– volume-title: An elephant in the room: The science and well-being of elephants in captivity
  year: 2009
  ident: ref59
  article-title: Protected contact and elephant welfare
– volume: 24
  start-page: 267
  year: 2015
  ident: ref20
  article-title: C-well: the development of a welfare assessment index for captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.3.267
– volume: 9
  start-page: 170
  year: 2022
  ident: ref25
  article-title: Welfare assessment tools in zoos: from theory to practice
  publication-title: Vet Sci
  doi: 10.3390/vetsci9040170
– volume: 3
  start-page: cov030
  year: 2015
  ident: ref54
  article-title: Stress and body condition are associated with climate and demography in Asian elephants
  publication-title: Conserv Physiol.
  doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov030
– volume: 12
  start-page: 33
  year: 1977
  ident: ref31
  article-title: Feeding behaviour of the Asiatic elephant Elephas maximus in south-East Sri Lanka about conservation
  publication-title: Biol Conserv
  doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(77)90056-8
– volume-title: Gone astray: The care and Management of the Asian Elephant in domesticity
  year: 1997
  ident: ref29
– volume: 13
  start-page: 2595
  year: 2023
  ident: ref76
  article-title: Behavioral welfare research for the management of sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani13162595
– volume: 28
  start-page: 507
  year: 2009
  ident: ref3
  article-title: Assessing animal welfare: different philosophies, different scientific approaches
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.20253
– volume: 39
  start-page: 148
  year: 2008
  ident: ref55
  article-title: A visual health assessment of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) housed in India
  publication-title: J Zoo Wildl Med
  doi: 10.1638/2007-0008R1.1
– volume-title: Identification of an effective and robust model of elephant keeping and keeper welfare; insights based on the activity budget of elephants in captivity and mahout-elephant interaction in Karnataka
  year: 2008
  ident: ref118
– volume-title: Taken for a ride: The conditions for elephants used in tourism in Asia, 2017
  year: 2017
  ident: ref53
– volume: 17
  start-page: 311
  year: 1998
  ident: ref39
  article-title: Captive breeding and infant mortality in Asian elephants Elephas maximus: a comparison between twenty western zoos and three eastern elephant centers
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1998)17:4<311:AID-ZOO5>3.0.CO;2-C
– volume: 42
  start-page: 328
  year: 2023
  ident: ref88
  article-title: The historical development of zoo elephant survivorship
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.21733
– volume-title: A review of the Welfare of zoo elephants in Europe
  year: 2002
  ident: ref38
– volume: 8
  start-page: 110
  year: 2018
  ident: ref26
  article-title: Assessment of welfare in zoo animals: towards optimum quality of life
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani8070110
– volume: 24
  start-page: 272
  year: 2021
  ident: ref18
  article-title: The use of a species-specific health and welfare assessment tool for the giant pacific octopus, Enteroctopus dofleini
  publication-title: J Appl Anim Welf Sci
  doi: 10.1080/10888705.2020.1809412
– volume-title: The Welfare, housing and husbandry of elephants in UK zoos
  year: 2008
  ident: ref43
– year: 2019
  ident: ref13
– volume: 18
  start-page: S1
  year: 2015
  ident: ref17
  article-title: A universal animal welfare framework for zoos
  publication-title: J Appl Anim Welf Sci
  doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1075830
– volume: 7
  start-page: coy077
  year: 2019
  ident: ref108
  article-title: The development of an immunoassay to measure immunoglobulin in Asian elephant feces, saliva, urine, and serum as a potential biomarker of well-being
  publication-title: Conserv Physiol
  doi: 10.1093/conphyscoy077
– volume: 24
  start-page: 139
  year: 2015
  ident: ref69
  article-title: Refinement of welfare through the development of a quantitative system for assessment of lifetime experience
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.2.139
– volume: 40
  start-page: 63
  year: 2006
  ident: ref30
  article-title: Concepts in the care and welfare of captive elephants
  publication-title: Int Zoo Yearb.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00063.x
– volume: 29
  start-page: 256
  year: 2010
  ident: ref44
  article-title: What do population-level welfare indices suggest about the well-being of zoo elephants?
  publication-title: Zoo Biol
  doi: 10.1002/zoo.20303
– volume: 12
  start-page: 445
  year: 2003
  ident: ref4
  article-title: Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: transparency in the food product quality chain
  publication-title: Anim Welf
  doi: 10.1017/S096272860002604X
– volume: 6
  start-page: 158
  year: 2019
  ident: ref72
  article-title: Monitoring the behavior and habitat use of animals to enhance welfare using the ZooMonitor app
  publication-title: Anim Behav Cogn
  doi: 10.26451/abc.06.03.01.2019
– volume: 11
  start-page: e0155223
  year: 2016
  ident: ref46
  article-title: Housing and demographic risk factors impacting foot and musculoskeletal health in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in north American zoos
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155223
– volume: 10
  start-page: 737
  year: 2020
  ident: ref62
  article-title: Commonalities in management and husbandry factors important for health and welfare of captive elephants in North America and Thailand
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10040737
– year: 2017
  ident: ref66
– volume: 102
  start-page: 55
  year: 2018
  ident: ref105
  article-title: Linking stress and immunity: immunoglobulin as a non-invasive physiological biomarker in animal welfare studies
  publication-title: Horm Behav
  doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.04.011
– volume: 23
  start-page: 164
  year: 2020
  ident: ref64
  article-title: Elephant tourism in Thailand: a review of animal welfare practices and needs
  publication-title: J Appl Anim Welf Sci
  doi: 10.1080/10888705.2019.1569522
– volume: 156
  start-page: 83
  year: 2018
  ident: ref16
  article-title: The 24/7 approach to promoting optimal welfare for captive wild animals
  publication-title: Behav Process
  doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.010
– volume: 14
  start-page: e0210783
  year: 2019
  ident: ref23
  article-title: Development of a behavioural welfare assessment tool for routine use with captive elephants
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210783
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1033821
  year: 2022
  ident: ref70
  article-title: Ackonc-AWA: a multi-species animal welfare assessment protocol for wild animals under human care to overcome the use of generic welfare checklists
  publication-title: Front Vet Sci
  doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1033821
– volume: 176
  start-page: 259
  year: 2012
  ident: ref113
  article-title: Seasonal rhythms of salivary cortisol secretion in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)
  publication-title: Gen Comp Endocrinol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.02.001
– volume: 11
  start-page: e0145673
  year: 2016
  ident: ref45
  article-title: Reproductive health assessment of female elephants in north American zoos and association of husbandry practices with reproductive dysfunction in African elephants (Loxodonta africana)
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145673
SSID ssj0001547380
Score 2.2845051
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Welfare is a fundamental aspect of animal management and conservation. In light of growing public awareness and welfare concerns about captive elephants, there...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1370909
SubjectTerms animal welfare
captive elephant
framework
tourist camp
Veterinary Science
welfare assessment
zoo
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQlNdCqYzEDYXGr3XCra1aVUjlRFFv1jgZqystyaqbwon_3rGdjXZRBReuGVt2PDOeGXnmG8Y-tKH2whtSJDI_hUZDOldBVWgjg6xwDlUqH7v8Or-40l-uzfVWq6-YE5bhgfPBHWlTlxCkMqClhrkFUkjvA0AZpME64XySzdsKpnJ9sLaqKnOVDEVh9VH4iUOE55b6k1C2rGMG4pYlSoD9D3mZfyZLblmf86fsyeg28uO83WfsEXb7bP97zGVJBbX8cnwjf85-n06tBXkfOHSLHzTzFy4D3CKHCYmTD32_XBO95bmNdLoGcf2Zd2TRODmzROM534OuRL5BH0-UBlbpIxmt1U1MpeGLjh-vF_CCXZ2ffTu9KMYmC0VDkfFQkAJXqCQYS-YySLAxo09gU7bkWJFyNtaAlMG0qqEItvVCg4nFuArJ9SlNo16yva7v8DXj4MvWIPFbeKlVZbxBC1pgLSRqC2HGxObAXTMikMdGGEtHkUhkkktMcpFJbmTSjH2c5qwy_sZfR59EPk4jI3Z2-kAS5UaJcv-SqBl7v5ECR7oWH1Cgw_5u7VQCSCQnjRZ6laViWor-V0m63Gas2pGXnb3sUrrFTcLzFhRG6rq0b_7H7t-yx_FEYpqckAdsb7i9w3fkNw3-MKnIPeNDGZg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38532794
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3003440669
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10964907
https://doaj.org/article/4590af235a424a67aaddbbfaa0f25e93
Volume 11
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELaqcuGCoLwWaGUkbiglfq0TpAqViqpCWk4s6s2aJGO60jZZNimPQ_97x042YlFB4hg775nxN5PMfMPYq8rnhSgMGRLBT6LRkM1lkCXaSC8znEIWy8dmn6Znc_3x3JzvsE27o-EFtreGdqGf1Hy9PPz57dc7MvijEHES3r7x37ELzNtSHwpl0zzU890hZLKho8FscPf7qmFtVWymJmUeuRHzvo7mL6fZwqpI6X-bH_pnOuVv-HR6n90bHEt-3GvCA7aD9R7b-xKyXWLJLZ8Nf9EfsuuTsfkgbzyHenFJR_7ApYc1chi5OnnXNMuW5iveN5qOCyW2b3lNmMfJ3aU53meE0KLJN_zkcaaEVRwkWFtdhGQbvqj5cbuAR2x--uHzyVkytGFISoqdu4RMPEMlwVgCVC_Bhpw_gWVaketF5ltaA1J6U6mSYtyqEBpMKNdVSBJITakes926qfEp41CklUHSCFFIrTJTGLSgBeZCorbgJ0xsXrgrB47y0Cpj6ShWCUJyUUguCMkNQpqw1-Mxq56h4597vw9yHPcM7NpxoFl_dYOxOm3yFLxUBrTUMLVAIFAUHiD10mCuJuzlRgscWWP4xQI1NletU5FCkdw4utCTXivGS9HzKknL34RlW_qydS_bM_XiIjJ-Cwo0dZ7aZ__1rM_Z3bAZMuaEfMF2u_UV7pML1RUH8dPDQbSOG4rgG5Q
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+animal+welfare+assessment+tools+and+methodologies%3A+need+for+an+effective+approach+for+captive+elephants+in+Asia&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+veterinary+science&rft.au=Ghimire%2C+Raman&rft.au=Brown%2C+Janine+L.&rft.au=Thitaram%2C+Chatchote&rft.au=Bansiddhi%2C+Pakkanut&rft.date=2024-03-12&rft.issn=2297-1769&rft.eissn=2297-1769&rft.volume=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffvets.2024.1370909&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3389_fvets_2024_1370909
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2297-1769&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2297-1769&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2297-1769&client=summon