Reduction in Root Secondary Growth as a Strategy for Phosphorus Acquisition

We tested the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth of dicotyledonous species improves phosphorus acquisition. Functional-structural modeling in SimRoot indicates that, in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), reduced root secondary growth reduces root metabolic costs, increases root length, imp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant physiology (Bethesda) Vol. 176; no. 1; pp. 691 - 703
Main Authors Strock, Christopher F., de la Riva, Laurie Morrow, Lynch, Jonathan P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society of Plant Biologists 01.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We tested the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth of dicotyledonous species improves phosphorus acquisition. Functional-structural modeling in SimRoot indicates that, in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), reduced root secondary growth reduces root metabolic costs, increases root length, improves phosphorus capture, and increases shoot biomass in low-phosphorus soil. Observations from the field and greenhouse confirm that, under phosphorus stress, resource allocation is shifted from secondary to primary root growth, genetic variation exists for this response, and reduced secondary growth improves phosphorus capture from low-phosphorus soil. Under low phosphorus in greenhouse mesocosms, genotypes with reduced secondary growth had 39% smaller root cross-sectional area, 60% less root respiration, 27% greater root length, 78% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 68% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. In the field under low phosphorus, these genotypes had 43% smaller root cross-sectional area, 32% greater root length, 58% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 80% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. Secondary growth eliminated arbuscular mycorrhizal associations as cortical tissue was destroyed. These results support the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth is an adaptive response to low phosphorus availability and merits investigation as a potential breeding target.
AbstractList We tested the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth of dicotyledonous species improves phosphorus acquisition. Functional-structural modeling in SimRoot indicates that, in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), reduced root secondary growth reduces root metabolic costs, increases root length, improves phosphorus capture, and increases shoot biomass in low-phosphorus soil. Observations from the field and greenhouse confirm that, under phosphorus stress, resource allocation is shifted from secondary to primary root growth, genetic variation exists for this response, and reduced secondary growth improves phosphorus capture from low-phosphorus soil. Under low phosphorus in greenhouse mesocosms, genotypes with reduced secondary growth had 39% smaller root cross-sectional area, 60% less root respiration, 27% greater root length, 78% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 68% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. In the field under low phosphorus, these genotypes had 43% smaller root cross-sectional area, 32% greater root length, 58% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 80% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. Secondary growth eliminated arbuscular mycorrhizal associations as cortical tissue was destroyed. These results support the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth is an adaptive response to low phosphorus availability and merits investigation as a potential breeding target.
Reduced root secondary growth decreases maintenance and construction costs, allowing greater root elongation and soil exploration, thereby improving P acquisition and plant growth under P stress. We tested the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth of dicotyledonous species improves phosphorus acquisition. Functional-structural modeling in SimRoot indicates that, in common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), reduced root secondary growth reduces root metabolic costs, increases root length, improves phosphorus capture, and increases shoot biomass in low-phosphorus soil. Observations from the field and greenhouse confirm that, under phosphorus stress, resource allocation is shifted from secondary to primary root growth, genetic variation exists for this response, and reduced secondary growth improves phosphorus capture from low-phosphorus soil. Under low phosphorus in greenhouse mesocosms, genotypes with reduced secondary growth had 39% smaller root cross-sectional area, 60% less root respiration, 27% greater root length, 78% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 68% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. In the field under low phosphorus, these genotypes had 43% smaller root cross-sectional area, 32% greater root length, 58% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 80% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. Secondary growth eliminated arbuscular mycorrhizal associations as cortical tissue was destroyed. These results support the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth is an adaptive response to low phosphorus availability and merits investigation as a potential breeding target.
We tested the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth of dicotyledonous species improves phosphorus acquisition. Functional-structural modeling in SimRoot indicates that, in common bean ( ), reduced root secondary growth reduces root metabolic costs, increases root length, improves phosphorus capture, and increases shoot biomass in low-phosphorus soil. Observations from the field and greenhouse confirm that, under phosphorus stress, resource allocation is shifted from secondary to primary root growth, genetic variation exists for this response, and reduced secondary growth improves phosphorus capture from low-phosphorus soil. Under low phosphorus in greenhouse mesocosms, genotypes with reduced secondary growth had 39% smaller root cross-sectional area, 60% less root respiration, 27% greater root length, 78% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 68% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. In the field under low phosphorus, these genotypes had 43% smaller root cross-sectional area, 32% greater root length, 58% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 80% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. Secondary growth eliminated arbuscular mycorrhizal associations as cortical tissue was destroyed. These results support the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth is an adaptive response to low phosphorus availability and merits investigation as a potential breeding target.
We tested the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth of dicotyledonous species improves phosphorus acquisition. Functional-structural modeling in SimRoot indicates that, in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), reduced root secondary growth reduces root metabolic costs, increases root length, improves phosphorus capture, and increases shoot biomass in low-phosphorus soil. Observations from the field and greenhouse confirm that, under phosphorus stress, resource allocation is shifted from secondary to primary root growth, genetic variation exists for this response, and reduced secondary growth improves phosphorus capture from low-phosphorus soil. Under low phosphorus in greenhouse mesocosms, genotypes with reduced secondary growth had 39% smaller root cross-sectional area, 60% less root respiration, 27% greater root length, 78% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 68% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. In the field under low phosphorus, these genotypes had 43% smaller root cross-sectional area, 32% greater root length, 58% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 80% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. Secondary growth eliminated arbuscular mycorrhizal associations as cortical tissue was destroyed. These results support the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth is an adaptive response to low phosphorus availability and merits investigation as a potential breeding target.We tested the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth of dicotyledonous species improves phosphorus acquisition. Functional-structural modeling in SimRoot indicates that, in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), reduced root secondary growth reduces root metabolic costs, increases root length, improves phosphorus capture, and increases shoot biomass in low-phosphorus soil. Observations from the field and greenhouse confirm that, under phosphorus stress, resource allocation is shifted from secondary to primary root growth, genetic variation exists for this response, and reduced secondary growth improves phosphorus capture from low-phosphorus soil. Under low phosphorus in greenhouse mesocosms, genotypes with reduced secondary growth had 39% smaller root cross-sectional area, 60% less root respiration, 27% greater root length, 78% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 68% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. In the field under low phosphorus, these genotypes had 43% smaller root cross-sectional area, 32% greater root length, 58% greater shoot phosphorus content, and 80% greater shoot mass than genotypes with advanced secondary growth. Secondary growth eliminated arbuscular mycorrhizal associations as cortical tissue was destroyed. These results support the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth is an adaptive response to low phosphorus availability and merits investigation as a potential breeding target.
Author Strock, Christopher F.
Lynch, Jonathan P.
de la Riva, Laurie Morrow
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Christopher F.
  surname: Strock
  fullname: Strock, Christopher F.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Laurie Morrow
  surname: de la Riva
  fullname: de la Riva, Laurie Morrow
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jonathan P.
  surname: Lynch
  fullname: Lynch, Jonathan P.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkd1P2zAUxa0JNEq3pz1v8iMSavG1HSd5QaoqYAgkJj6eLcdxWqM0DrYD4r_HXQuMiSdb9rm_c3TuPtrpXGcQ-gFkCkD4Ud9PIZ8SyAr2BY0gY3RCM17soBEh6U6KotxD-yHcE0KAAf-K9mgJUFBejtDFtakHHa3rsO3wtXMR3xjtulr5Z3zm3VNcYhWwwjfRq2gWz7hxHv9ZutAvnR8CnumHwQa7JnxDu41qg_m-Pcfo7vTkdv57cnl1dj6fXU40F2WcQK2rijW0IkJlUOpKpbQVMzltSsGBQGUqJkzONcsZNJCeGShFRa5NVjeCjdHxhtsP1crU2nQpWyt7b1cptXTKyo8_nV3KhXuUWS6gIFkCHGwB3j0MJkS5skGbtlWdcUOQUArKaVGm_sbo179ebyavDSYBbATauxC8aaS2Ua3rSNa2lUDkekuy7yXk8u-W0szhfzOv2M_VPzfq-xCdf08gWF5wnrEXH5Odng
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_34133_2021_6953197
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rhisph_2024_100907
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10529_020_02968_0
crossref_primary_10_1093_jxb_erad421
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_716691
crossref_primary_10_1093_jxb_erz258
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms241612786
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_024_06892_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_019_04332_2
crossref_primary_10_1093_jxb_erz060
crossref_primary_10_1111_pce_14552
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20312
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_021_05010_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plaphy_2023_108313
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_13562
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42729_021_00418_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13233361
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05413_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_tpj_15560
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11738_021_03284_4
crossref_primary_10_1093_jxb_ery379
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12870_020_02558_2
crossref_primary_10_34133_2020_3252703
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05434_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants9091204
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plantsci_2023_111903
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rhisph_2020_100196
crossref_primary_10_1111_pce_13875
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy11112267
crossref_primary_10_2298_ABS220309016H
crossref_primary_10_3832_ifor2797_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plaphy_2024_109417
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40011_019_01081_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_17978
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_1067498
crossref_primary_10_1093_jxb_erz271
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants11182338
crossref_primary_10_1111_ppl_12751
crossref_primary_10_1111_tpj_14160
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10050637
crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcaa068
crossref_primary_10_1080_00380768_2021_2022965
crossref_primary_10_1093_forestry_cpac030
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12298_023_01319_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_17520
crossref_primary_10_1111_tpj_15774
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05527_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_019_04246_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10457_019_00473_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2019_04_012
crossref_primary_10_1111_pce_14213
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2020_607878
crossref_primary_10_1111_tpj_14722
crossref_primary_10_1111_pce_13683
crossref_primary_10_1111_pce_14175
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2020_00546
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_17329
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy11030552
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_019_4383_7
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2019_00237
crossref_primary_10_1002_ppj2_20035
crossref_primary_10_1007_s44154_023_00083_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plantsci_2019_110385
crossref_primary_10_1093_plphys_kiac405
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plaphy_2024_108386
crossref_primary_10_1093_jxb_eraa165
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_827369
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biosystems_2023_104847
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xplc_2021_100246
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20838
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_51204_x
crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcab144
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_883209
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00425_023_04158_4
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2219668120
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_959629
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11103_024_01470_9
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture14030447
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42106_022_00225_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05579_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes10020139
crossref_primary_10_5433_1679_0359_2022v43n3p1017
crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcac087
crossref_primary_10_3390_horticulturae9090988
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_indcrop_2021_113821
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00344_021_10486_0
crossref_primary_10_1093_jxb_erz293
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_15738
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_023_06301_2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists
2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.
2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved. 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists
– notice: 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.
– notice: 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved. 2017
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1104/pp.17.01583
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
EISSN 1532-2548
EndPage 703
ExternalDocumentID PMC5761805
29118249
10_1104_pp_17_01583
26378445
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: U.S. Department of Agriculture
  grantid: 4582
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
0R~
123
29O
2AX
2WC
2~F
4.4
5VS
5WD
85S
8R4
8R5
AAHBH
AAHKG
AAPXW
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAVAP
AAXTN
ABBHK
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABJNI
ABMNT
ABPLY
ABPPZ
ABPTD
ABTLG
ABVGC
ABXSQ
ABXVV
ABXZS
ACBTR
ACGOD
ACNCT
ACPRK
ACUFI
ADBBV
ADGKP
ADIPN
ADIYS
ADQBN
ADVEK
ADYHW
AEEJZ
AENEX
AEUPB
AFAZZ
AFFZL
AFGWE
AFRAH
AGORE
AHMBA
AICQM
AJBYB
AJEEA
AJNCP
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALXQX
ATGXG
BAWUL
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BTFSW
CBGCD
CS3
DATOO
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
F5P
FLUFQ
FOEOM
H13
IPSME
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBS
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JST
JXSIZ
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
MV1
NOMLY
OBOKY
OJZSN
OK1
OWPYF
P2P
Q2X
RHI
ROX
RPB
RWL
RXW
SA0
TAE
TN5
TR2
W8F
WH7
WOQ
XSW
YBU
YKV
YNT
YSK
YZZ
ZCA
ZCN
~02
~KM
53G
7X2
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8CJ
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FW
8G5
AAWDT
AAYJJ
AAYXX
ABIME
ABPIB
ABUWG
ABZEO
ACFRR
ACHIC
ACIPB
ACUTJ
ACVCV
ACZBC
ADULT
ADXHL
AEUYN
AFFDN
AFKRA
AFYAG
AGMDO
AGUYK
AHGBF
AHXOZ
AIDAL
AIDBO
AJDVS
ANFBD
APJGH
AQDSO
AQVQM
AS~
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
CCPQU
CITATION
D1J
DWQXO
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GTFYD
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HTVGU
LK8
LU7
M0K
M1P
M2O
M2P
M2Q
M7P
MVM
NU-
P0-
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
QZG
S0X
TCN
UBC
UKHRP
UKR
WHG
XOL
Y6R
ZCG
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-1dcbb3f2b06a519cba548b3e72f964101beb36e74c3731f12f931aa267ce5df63
ISSN 0032-0889
1532-2548
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 13:36:41 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 12:17:35 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:05:48 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:08:34 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:57 EDT 2025
Thu May 29 09:01:55 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c469t-1dcbb3f2b06a519cba548b3e72f964101beb36e74c3731f12f931aa267ce5df63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.17.01583
C.F.S. performed all of the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the article with contributions of all the authors; L.M.d.l.R. carried out the original screening and foundational research for these published data; J.P.L. conceived the hypotheses and supervised the design, experimentation, analysis, and reporting.
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Jonathan P. Lynch (jpl4@psu.edu).
Current address: 221 Tyson Building, University Park, PA 16802.
ORCID 0000-0003-1432-8130
0000-0002-7265-9790
OpenAccessLink http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/plantphysiol/176/1/691.full.pdf
PMID 29118249
PQID 1962428900
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5761805
proquest_miscellaneous_1962428900
pubmed_primary_29118249
crossref_citationtrail_10_1104_pp_17_01583
crossref_primary_10_1104_pp_17_01583
jstor_primary_26378445
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Plant physiology (Bethesda)
PublicationTitleAlternate Plant Physiol
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher American Society of Plant Biologists
Publisher_xml – name: American Society of Plant Biologists
SSID ssj0001314
Score 2.5368009
Snippet We tested the hypothesis that reduced root secondary growth of dicotyledonous species improves phosphorus acquisition. Functional-structural modeling in...
Reduced root secondary growth decreases maintenance and construction costs, allowing greater root elongation and soil exploration, thereby improving P...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
jstor
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 691
SubjectTerms Biomass
Cell Respiration
Computer Simulation
ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Hyphae - physiology
Mycorrhizae - physiology
Phaseolus - growth & development
Phaseolus - metabolism
Phaseolus - physiology
Phenotype
Phosphorus - metabolism
Plant Development
Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology
Plant Roots - anatomy & histology
Plant Roots - growth & development
Plant Roots - metabolism
Plant Shoots - growth & development
Title Reduction in Root Secondary Growth as a Strategy for Phosphorus Acquisition
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/26378445
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118249
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1962428900
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5761805
Volume 176
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagcOCCeBWWl4zUE1GWOE7i5NgiUKEUoVUr9RbZjqONVJLQZEHLr2ccO6-ySMAlWjmOs_I3O56ZnfkGoQMWhjyDo8xVVCk3EHHuxlko3RiOXg7HM1dSxztOP0fH58HHi_BibJfaVZe0Yil_7qwr-R9UYQxw1VWy_4DssCgMwGfAF66AMFz_CuOV5l3tsxVXVdXq8HmlQwNbHVT6ocvWGoc7loLW5GZ-WVdNva6uNo1zKL9tCpO0NTVSdSOj1sQ8DEMTWKFHujC4yfgkcgCrWmU6YSgYM4VPK03v6GTKueTOqvjO-zLsYpClT9vSdKLqY_i22sxGIUg8iUKoXnP6Lnib8Uy1mt4uMxkyijIyPbp-V-BeoLsO10vClmCpmCY3Eyjrrx2WfqIdI0N2eo0vu791E93ywXXo3OwPJ8PpTCgJbJ0mvOvN5E2aF9o-OzNSTJ7qLg_keiLtxDI5u4fuWpcCHxr5uI9uqPIBun1Ugdm_fYhOBiHBRYm1kOBBSLAREswbzHEvJBiEBI9CgidC8gidv3939vbYtR00XBlESeuSTApBc194EQdTXQoOAAmqmJ8nUQDaWChBI8UCSRklOYFhSjj3IyZVmOUR3Ud7ZVWqJwgrOAs4yWmYeCJIOFiJWSyFH4c5YZnyvQV63W9ZKi29vO5ycpl2bqYXpHWdEpZ2W71AB8Pk2rCq7J623-39MMePKAMtEi7Qqx6MFNSh_o-Ll6raNCkcKGB0xokHX-ixAWd82qK7QGwG2zBBU63P75TFuqNcB6-cxF749I9rPkN3xp_Fc7TXXm3UCzBXW_Gyk79fo86W0g
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduction+in+Root+Secondary+Growth+as+a+Strategy+for+Phosphorus+Acquisition&rft.jtitle=Plant+physiology+%28Bethesda%29&rft.au=Strock%2C+Christopher+F&rft.au=Morrow+de+la+Riva%2C+Laurie&rft.au=Lynch%2C+Jonathan+P&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.eissn=1532-2548&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1104%2Fpp.17.01583&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29118249&rft.externalDocID=29118249
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0032-0889&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0032-0889&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0032-0889&client=summon