Practical medical applications of quantitative MR relaxometry

Conventional MR images are qualitative, and their signal intensity is dependent on several complementary contrast mechanisms that are manipulated by the MR hardware and software. In the absence of a quantitative metric for absolute interpretation of pixel signal intensities, one that is independent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 805 - 824
Main Authors Margaret Cheng, Hai-Ling, Stikov, Nikola, Ghugre, Nilesh R., Wright, Graham A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.10.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Conventional MR images are qualitative, and their signal intensity is dependent on several complementary contrast mechanisms that are manipulated by the MR hardware and software. In the absence of a quantitative metric for absolute interpretation of pixel signal intensities, one that is independent of scanner hardware and sequences, it is difficult to perform comparisons of MR images across subjects or longitudinally in the same subject. Quantitative relaxometry isolates the contributions of individual MR contrast mechanisms (T1, T2, T2*) and provides maps, which are independent of the MR protocol and have a physical interpretation often expressed in absolute units. In addition to providing an unbiased metric for comparing MR scans, quantitative relaxometry uses the relationship between MR maps and physiology to provide a noninvasive surrogate for biopsy and histology. This study provides an overview of some promising clinical applications of quantitative relaxometry, followed by a description of the methods and challenges of acquiring accurate and precise quantitative MR maps. It concludes with three case studies of quantitative relaxometry applied to studying multiple sclerosis, liver iron, and acute myocardial infarction. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:805–824. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JMRI23718
istex:5F45D7423FFBF746DF8F4B2DACA270F88C40892A
ark:/67375/WNG-JQJKMNT0-D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.23718