Cooperative pricing and scale efficiency: The case of Korean rice processing complexes
Unlike most investor‐owned enterprises, cooperatives often have freedom to choose among a variety of firm objectives. Using 2002–2008 plant‐ and province‐level data, we ask in the present article which of several alternative maximands a Korean cooperative rice processing firm pursues. In contrast to...
Saved in:
Published in | Agricultural economics Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 309 - 321 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Unlike most investor‐owned enterprises, cooperatives often have freedom to choose among a variety of firm objectives. Using 2002–2008 plant‐ and province‐level data, we ask in the present article which of several alternative maximands a Korean cooperative rice processing firm pursues. In contrast to earlier studies, farmer‐member supply functions are incorporated into the cooperative's optimization framework. We show that only large cooperative firms have operated at efficient scale, while small and medium‐sized ones have been scale‐inefficient. Because the latter operate where scale returns are increasing, mergers of small and medium‐sized cooperatives likely would be cost‐reducing and member‐return‐enhancing. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract
Unlike most investor‐owned enterprises, cooperatives often have freedom to choose among a variety of firm objectives. Using 2002–2008 plant‐ and province‐level data, we ask in the present article which of several alternative maximands a Korean cooperative rice processing firm pursues. In contrast to earlier studies, farmer‐member supply functions are incorporated into the cooperative's optimization framework. We show that only large cooperative firms have operated at efficient scale, while small and medium‐sized ones have been scale‐inefficient. Because the latter operate where scale returns are increasing, mergers of small and medium‐sized cooperatives likely would be cost‐reducing and member‐return‐enhancing. Unlike most investor-owned enterprises, cooperatives often have freedom to choose among a variety of firm objectives. Using 2002-2008 plant- and province-level data, we ask in the present article which of several alternative maximands a Korean cooperative rice processing firm pursues. In contrast to earlier studies, farmer-member supply functions are incorporated into the cooperative's optimization framework. We show that only large cooperative firms have operated at efficient scale, while small and medium-sized ones have been scale-inefficient. Because the latter operate where scale returns are increasing, mergers of small and medium-sized cooperatives likely would be cost-reducing and member-return-enhancing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Unlike most investor‐owned enterprises, cooperatives often have freedom to choose among a variety of firm objectives. Using 2002–2008 plant‐ and province‐level data, we ask in the present article which of several alternative maximands a Korean cooperative rice processing firm pursues. In contrast to earlier studies, farmer‐member supply functions are incorporated into the cooperative's optimization framework. We show that only large cooperative firms have operated at efficient scale, while small and medium‐sized ones have been scale‐inefficient. Because the latter operate where scale returns are increasing, mergers of small and medium‐sized cooperatives likely would be cost‐reducing and member‐return‐enhancing. |
Author | Yoo, Chun-Kwon Gopinath, Munisamy Buccola, Steven |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Chun-Kwon surname: Yoo fullname: Yoo, Chun-Kwon organization: National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (Nonghyup), Saemunangil 91, Seoul, Chung-gu, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Steven surname: Buccola fullname: Buccola, Steven email: sbuccola@oregonstate.edu organization: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, OR, 97331, Corvallis, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Munisamy surname: Gopinath fullname: Gopinath, Munisamy organization: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Mail Stop 1800, DC, 20250-0002, Washington, USA |
BookMark | eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QsssUNK8SN2EnZVRQuiPBYBlpaZjiGQxiVugf49DgWWWCNZss6Z8dw9st34Bgk55GzA4zmxTwgDLhiXW6THVZYmLNdim_QY10WiuGK7ZC-EF8Z4yoTskfuR9wts7bJ6R7poK6iaJ2qbGQ1ga6ToXHzCBtantHxGCjYg9Y5e-hZtQyPfWR4whE4EP1_U-Ilhn-w4Wwc8-Ln75G58Vo7Ok-nN5GI0nCaQ6kImmYbiEXIs9ExokDZzAqHIUqbjDmBnucutEIWyqoBcAdciZ6nQmWMKgTMn--Ro0zd-4m2FYWle_Kpt4kjDpWKxRCYjdbyhoPUhtOhM3HRu27XhzHS5mS43851bhPkG_qhqXP9DmuHkbPTrJBunCkv8_HNs-2p0JjNlHq4n5vK2fLgS49JM5Re-pX_x |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_agec_12405 crossref_primary_10_1177_0973005219833252 crossref_primary_10_1111_agec_12483 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40008_022_00282_8 crossref_primary_10_1108_AJEMS_10_2018_0291 |
Cites_doi | 10.2307/1234405 10.2307/1241423 10.1016/0304-4076(87)90006-6 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01448.x 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00324.x 10.2307/1243338 10.1111/j.1744-7976.1983.tb01054.x 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00270.x 10.2307/1235830 10.1017/S1068280500005335 10.1093/erae/jbp027 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1983.tb00973.x 10.2307/1233716 10.1002/agr.20000 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00554.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 International Association of Agricultural Economists |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 International Association of Agricultural Economists |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7ST C1K SOI |
DOI | 10.1111/agec.12013 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Environment Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Environment Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Environment Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Environment Abstracts |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics |
EISSN | 1574-0862 |
EndPage | 321 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2968940941 10_1111_agec_12013 AGEC12013 ark_67375_WNG_KPTWM2FT_L |
Genre | article |
GroupedDBID | --K .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1B1 1OC 1RT 1~5 23M 31~ 33P 3R3 4.4 4G. 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52S 52T 52U 52W 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 6J9 7-5 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A04 A8Z AACTN AAEDT AAESR AAHHS AAJUZ AALCJ AALRI AAONW AAOUF AAQFI AAQXK AASGY AAXRX AAXUO AAZKR ABCUV ABCVL ABJNI ABMAC ABPVW ABSOO ABWRO ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACHQT ACIUM ACPOU ACROA ACXME ACXQS ADBBV ADDAD ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMUD ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFPWT AFRAH AFVGU AGJLS AHBTC AHHHB AI. AIFKG AITUG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJYWA ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-C D-D DCZOG DPXWK DRFUL DRSSH EBS ECGQY EJD EOH ESTFP F00 F01 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID G-2 G-S G.N G50 GODZA HLV HMB HVGLF HZ~ IHE ITG ITH J0M LATKE LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LW9 LY5 LYRES M41 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MS~ MXFUL MXSSH MY~ N04 N06 N9A NF~ O-L O66 O9- P2P P2W P2Y P4C PAUHU Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K R2- RIG ROL RPZ RX1 SAB SEE SEW SSZ SUPJJ TN5 UB1 V8K VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WEBCB WIH WII WOHZO WRC WSUWO WUQ WXSBR XG1 Y6R YK3 ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~S- ~WP AABNI AAHBH AKRWK HGLYW OIG AAYXX CITATION 7ST C1K SOI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4693-76c9bc8e96d26c3a7f2ec97406120cad8f8a2295a59c85c162804267f05ec10f3 |
ISSN | 0169-5150 |
IngestDate | Thu Oct 10 21:02:46 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 00:49:01 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:53:39 EDT 2024 Wed Jan 17 05:00:04 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4693-76c9bc8e96d26c3a7f2ec97406120cad8f8a2295a59c85c162804267f05ec10f3 |
Notes | ark:/67375/WNG-KPTWM2FT-L istex:18C1336D94ACB332944EFCA1C65FBF547E157A31 ArticleID:AGEC12013 The views expressed here are those of the author(s), and may not be attributed to the Economic Research Service or the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Data used in this study are proprietary. Researchers wishing to test or replicate results presented in the article should contact the authors, who will extend their best efforts to help secure access to the data from Korea's National Agricultural Cooperative Federation. |
PQID | 1350350273 |
PQPubID | 946354 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_1350350273 crossref_primary_10_1111_agec_12013 wiley_primary_10_1111_agec_12013_AGEC12013 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_KPTWM2FT_L |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | May 2013 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2013 text: May 2013 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Malden |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Malden |
PublicationTitle | Agricultural economics |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Agricultural Economics |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | Royer, J.S., Smith, D.B., 2007. Patronage refunds, producer expectations, and optimal pricing by agricultural cooperatives. J. Coop. 20, 1-16. Sexton, R.J., Wilson, B.M., Wann, J.J., 1989. Some tests of the economic theory of cooperatives: Methodology and application to cotton ginning. West. J. Agric. Econ. 14(1), 56-66. Buccola, S.T., 1994. Cooperatives. Encyclopedia Agric. Sci. 1, 431-440. Ariyaratne, C.B., Featherstone, A.M., Langemeier, M.R., Barton, D.G., 2000. Measuring X-efficiency and scale efficiency for a sample of agricultural cooperatives. Agric. Res. Econ. Rev. 29(2), 198-207. Clark, E., 1952. Farmers cooperatives and economic welfare. J. Farm Econ. 34, 35-51. Julia, J.F., Mari, S., 2002. Farm co-operatives and the social economy: The case of Spain. J. Rural Co-op. 30, 119-133. LeVay, C., 1983a. Agricultural co-operative theory: A review. J. Agric. Econ. 34, 1-44. Harris A., Stefanson, B., Fulton, M., 1996. New generation cooperatives and cooperative theory. J. Coop. 11, 15-28. Conrad, K., Unger, R., 1987. Ex-post tests for short and long-run optimization. J. Econ. 36(3), 339-358. Cook, M.L., 1995. The future of U.S. agricultural cooperatives: A neo-institutional approach. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77, 1153-1159. Soboh, R.A., Lansink, A.O., Giesen, G., Van Dijk, G., 2009. Performance measurement of the agricultural marketing cooperatives: The gap between theory and practice. Rev. Agric. Econ. 31(3), 446-469. Merrett, C.D., Walzer, N., 2004. Cooperatives and Local Development: Theory and Applications for the 21st Century. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NJ. Wollni, M., Zeller, M., 2007. Do farmers benefit from participating in specialty markets and cooperatives? The case of coffee marketing in Costa Rica. Agric. Econ. 37, 243-248. Greene, W.H., 2008. Econometric Analysis, 6th edition. Pearson Education, Inc., London. Boyle, G.E., 2004. The economic efficiency of Irish dairy marketing co-operatives. Agribus 20(2), 143-153. Sexton, R.J., 1986. The formation of cooperatives: A game-theoretic approach with implications for cooperative finance, decision making and stability. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 68, 214-225. Bernard, T., Taffesse, A.S., Gabre-Madhin, E., 2008. Impact of cooperatives on smallholders' commercialization behavior: Evidence from Ethiopia. Agric. Econ. 39, 147-161. Helmberger, P., Hoos, S., 1962. Cooperative enterprise and organization theory. J. Farm Econ. 44, 275-290. Cross, R.M., Buccola, S.T., Thomann, E.A., 2009. Cooperative liquidation under competitive stress. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 36(3), 369-393. Lamprinakis, L., Fulton, M., 2011. Does acquisition of a cooperative generate profits for the buyer? The dairyworld case. Agric. Econ. 42, 89-100. LeVay, C., 1983b. Some problems of agricultural marketing cooperatives' price/output determination in imperfect competition. Canadian J. Agric. Econ. 31, 105-110. Ohm, H., 1956. Member behavior and optimal pricing in marketing cooperatives. J. Farm Econ. 38, 613-621. Cobia, D.W., 1989. Cooperatives in Agriculture. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ. Staatz, J.M., 1987. Recent developments in the theory of agricultural cooperation. J. Coop. 2, 74-95. 1987; 36 1952; 34 1987; 2 2004; 20 2000; 29 2002; 30 1995; 77 2008; 39 2008 1956; 38 2004 1983a; 34 2007; 37 1996; 11 2009; 36 1983b; 31 2009; 31 1986; 68 2011; 42 1987 1962; 44 1994; 1 2007; 20 1989; 14 1989 e_1_2_9_10_1 e_1_2_9_13_1 Harris A. (e_1_2_9_12_1) 1996; 11 Buccola S.T. (e_1_2_9_5_1) 1994; 1 Merrett C.D. (e_1_2_9_20_1) 2004 e_1_2_9_15_1 e_1_2_9_17_1 e_1_2_9_16_1 Sexton R.J. (e_1_2_9_25_1) 1989; 14 e_1_2_9_19_1 e_1_2_9_18_1 e_1_2_9_22_1 e_1_2_9_21_1 e_1_2_9_24_1 e_1_2_9_8_1 Cobia D.W. (e_1_2_9_7_1) 1989 e_1_2_9_6_1 e_1_2_9_4_1 e_1_2_9_3_1 e_1_2_9_2_1 Julia J.F. (e_1_2_9_14_1) 2002; 30 Royer J.S. (e_1_2_9_23_1) 2007; 20 e_1_2_9_9_1 e_1_2_9_26_1 Greene W.H. (e_1_2_9_11_1) 2008 e_1_2_9_28_1 Staatz J.M. (e_1_2_9_27_1) 1987; 2 |
References_xml | – volume: 30 start-page: 119 year: 2002 end-page: 133 article-title: Farm co‐operatives and the social economy: The case of Spain publication-title: J. Rural Co‐op. – volume: 11 start-page: 15 year: 1996 end-page: 28. article-title: New generation cooperatives and cooperative theory publication-title: J. Coop. – volume: 34 start-page: 1 year: 1983a end-page: 44 article-title: Agricultural co‐operative theory: A review publication-title: J. Agric. Econ. – volume: 36 start-page: 339 issue: 3 year: 1987 end-page: 358 article-title: Ex‐post tests for short and long‐run optimization publication-title: J. Econ. – year: 1987 – year: 1989 – volume: 29 start-page: 198 issue: 2 year: 2000 end-page: 207 article-title: Measuring X‐efficiency and scale efficiency for a sample of agricultural cooperatives publication-title: Agric. Res. Econ. Rev. – volume: 36 start-page: 369 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 393 article-title: Cooperative liquidation under competitive stress publication-title: Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. – volume: 77 start-page: 1153 year: 1995 end-page: 1159 article-title: The future of U.S. agricultural cooperatives: A neo‐institutional approach publication-title: Am. J. Agric. Econ. – volume: 20 start-page: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 16 article-title: Patronage refunds, producer expectations, and optimal pricing by agricultural cooperatives publication-title: J. Coop. – volume: 31 start-page: 105 year: 1983b end-page: 110 article-title: Some problems of agricultural marketing cooperatives’ price/output determination in imperfect competition publication-title: Canadian J. Agric. Econ. – volume: 34 start-page: 35 year: 1952 end-page: 51 article-title: Farmers cooperatives and economic welfare publication-title: J. Farm Econ. – volume: 31 start-page: 446 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 469 article-title: Performance measurement of the agricultural marketing cooperatives: The gap between theory and practice publication-title: Rev. Agric. Econ. – year: 2008 – volume: 68 start-page: 214 year: 1986 end-page: 225 article-title: The formation of cooperatives: A game‐theoretic approach with implications for cooperative finance, decision making and stability publication-title: Am. J. Agric. Econ. – volume: 1 start-page: 431 year: 1994 end-page: 440 article-title: Cooperatives publication-title: Encyclopedia Agric. Sci. – year: 2004 – volume: 14 start-page: 56 issue: 1 year: 1989 end-page: 66 article-title: Some tests of the economic theory of cooperatives: Methodology and application to cotton ginning publication-title: West. J. Agric. Econ. – volume: 39 start-page: 147 year: 2008 end-page: 161 article-title: Impact of cooperatives on smallholders’ commercialization behavior: Evidence from Ethiopia publication-title: Agric. Econ. – volume: 42 start-page: 89 year: 2011 end-page: 100 article-title: Does acquisition of a cooperative generate profits for the buyer? The dairyworld case publication-title: Agric. Econ. – volume: 20 start-page: 143 issue: 2 year: 2004 end-page: 153 article-title: The economic efficiency of Irish dairy marketing co‐operatives publication-title: Agribus – volume: 44 start-page: 275 year: 1962 end-page: 290 article-title: Cooperative enterprise and organization theory publication-title: J. Farm Econ. – volume: 37 start-page: 243 year: 2007 end-page: 248 article-title: Do farmers benefit from participating in specialty markets and cooperatives? The case of coffee marketing in Costa Rica publication-title: Agric. Econ. – volume: 38 start-page: 613 year: 1956 end-page: 621 article-title: Member behavior and optimal pricing in marketing cooperatives publication-title: J. Farm Econ. – volume: 2 start-page: 74 year: 1987 end-page: 95 article-title: Recent developments in the theory of agricultural cooperation publication-title: J. Coop. – ident: e_1_2_9_21_1 doi: 10.2307/1234405 – ident: e_1_2_9_24_1 doi: 10.2307/1241423 – ident: e_1_2_9_8_1 doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(87)90006-6 – ident: e_1_2_9_26_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01448.x – ident: e_1_2_9_3_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00324.x – volume-title: Cooperatives and Local Development: Theory and Applications for the 21st Century year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_9_20_1 contributor: fullname: Merrett C.D. – volume: 20 start-page: 1 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_9_23_1 article-title: Patronage refunds, producer expectations, and optimal pricing by agricultural cooperatives publication-title: J. Coop. contributor: fullname: Royer J.S. – ident: e_1_2_9_9_1 doi: 10.2307/1243338 – ident: e_1_2_9_19_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.1983.tb01054.x – ident: e_1_2_9_28_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00270.x – ident: e_1_2_9_13_1 doi: 10.2307/1235830 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_1 doi: 10.1017/S1068280500005335 – ident: e_1_2_9_10_1 doi: 10.1093/erae/jbp027 – ident: e_1_2_9_16_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_18_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1983.tb00973.x – volume: 14 start-page: 56 issue: 1 year: 1989 ident: e_1_2_9_25_1 article-title: Some tests of the economic theory of cooperatives: Methodology and application to cotton ginning publication-title: West. J. Agric. Econ. contributor: fullname: Sexton R.J. – volume-title: Econometric Analysis, year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_9_11_1 contributor: fullname: Greene W.H. – volume: 11 start-page: 15 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_9_12_1 article-title: New generation cooperatives and cooperative theory publication-title: J. Coop. contributor: fullname: Harris A. – volume: 30 start-page: 119 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_9_14_1 article-title: Farm co‐operatives and the social economy: The case of Spain publication-title: J. Rural Co‐op. contributor: fullname: Julia J.F. – volume-title: Cooperatives in Agriculture year: 1989 ident: e_1_2_9_7_1 contributor: fullname: Cobia D.W. – volume: 2 start-page: 74 year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_9_27_1 article-title: Recent developments in the theory of agricultural cooperation publication-title: J. Coop. contributor: fullname: Staatz J.M. – ident: e_1_2_9_6_1 doi: 10.2307/1233716 – ident: e_1_2_9_4_1 doi: 10.1002/agr.20000 – ident: e_1_2_9_15_1 – volume: 1 start-page: 431 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_9_5_1 article-title: Cooperatives publication-title: Encyclopedia Agric. Sci. contributor: fullname: Buccola S.T. – ident: e_1_2_9_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_17_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00554.x |
SSID | ssj0014023 |
Score | 2.0713923 |
Snippet | Unlike most investor‐owned enterprises, cooperatives often have freedom to choose among a variety of firm objectives. Using 2002–2008 plant‐ and province‐level... Abstract Unlike most investor‐owned enterprises, cooperatives often have freedom to choose among a variety of firm objectives. Using 2002–2008 plant‐ and... Unlike most investor-owned enterprises, cooperatives often have freedom to choose among a variety of firm objectives. Using 2002-2008 plant- and province-level... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 309 |
SubjectTerms | Cooperatives Efficiency Firm objectives L21 L25 L31 Pricing efficiency Q13 Scale efficiency Studies |
Title | Cooperative pricing and scale efficiency: The case of Korean rice processing complexes |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-KPTWM2FT-L/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fagec.12013 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1350350273 |
Volume | 44 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZK-wAviKsoDGQJxAMoU2LHTsLbqLZOhE0IdXRvkePYA4GaKG2h8Os5jp3LJIYYL1GVHqXpOZ-dc_tOEHqhZR5qSXJPRpx7sBK5J_JAe0T7UkWxNDOfTLfFKT8-C9-ds_PRaDfoWtpu8n3564-8kv-xKpwDuxqW7DUs210UTsBnsC8cwcJw_Ccbz8qyUm50d1WbGrklHK5B8U2rxpdm5f5sWyuksJn7tKxNAt7ME3pdWaaA495W39TOdRW2o2kv6n48h3I05nW_WdhU6-ftqmubSH_0pf23WwlIE66f7HvPO5sbopawSZ2TpqTuqBUuAxEM-v3apCRPPPCLbH1FuY00Cj0TLg13Wjvp0SGKDrZN6ieDJzC1nOkrNneQkPuBuY_-EdaW7TspdrWcHfY7P5w1391AExIljI3R5CD9uEy7ChTE1dTOhbf_zY22NV1g_ZUvOTMTsy53lyKVYbzTOCyLO-i2izTwgYXNXTRSq3voZktEX99HnwbwwQ4-GOCDG_jgHj5vMIAHG_DgUmMLHmzAg3vw4A48D9DZ0eFiduy512x4MuQJ9SIuk1zGKuEF4ZKKSBMlIcw0zq8vRRHrWJiXvguWyJjJgJPYBN6R9pmSga_pQzRelSv1COEiKSA-SIgWIQvzIM41gYgjoILIArAQT9HzVl9ZZaepZG0UarSaNVqdopeNKjsRUX81_YcRy5an8yz9sFiekKNF9n6K9lpdZ25ZrrOAMlMtB7d8il41-v_LT2UdEB5fR_gJutUvhD003tRb9RSc003-zOHoNxGAi2k |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,27955,27956 |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cooperative+pricing+and+scale+efficiency%3A+The+case+of+Korean+rice+processing+complexes&rft.jtitle=Agricultural+economics&rft.au=Yoo%2C+Chun%E2%80%90Kwon&rft.au=Buccola%2C+Steven&rft.au=Gopinath%2C+Munisamy&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.issn=0169-5150&rft.eissn=1574-0862&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fagec.12013&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fagec.12013&rft.externalDocID=AGEC12013 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0169-5150&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0169-5150&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0169-5150&client=summon |