Comparison of elective nodal irradiation and involved-field irradiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

It remains controversial whether radical radiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) still requires elective nodal irradiation (ENI), or only involved-field irradiation (IFI). In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare ENI and IFI in the treatment of ESCC, in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of radiation research Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 604 - 615
Main Authors Cheng, Yun-Jie, Jing, Shao-Wu, Zhu, Ling-Ling, Wang, Jun, Wang, Long, Liu, Qing, Yang, Cong-Rong, Wang, Yi, Cao, Feng, Jiao, Wen-Peng, Wu, Ya-Jing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.09.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It remains controversial whether radical radiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) still requires elective nodal irradiation (ENI), or only involved-field irradiation (IFI). In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare ENI and IFI in the treatment of ESCC, in order to provide guidance for clinical practice. Literature on the use of ENI and IFI in the treatment of ESCC was retrieved, and the last access date was 31 December 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of using ENI and IFI. Ten studies, involving a total of 1348 patients, were included in this analysis; of these, 605 patients underwent radiotherapy only, and 743 underwent radiochemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the 1-, 2- or 3-year local control rates between ENI and IFI, or in the 1-, 2- or 3-year overall survival rates. However, the incidences of ≥Grade 3 acute esophagitis and pneumonia were significantly lower in the IFI group. There were no differences in the rates of ≥Grade 3 myelosuppression or of out-field recurrence or metastasis between these two groups. Thus, neither local control rates nor overall survival rates differed significantly between the ENI and IFI groups, but in the latter group, incidences of severe radiation esophagitis and pneumonia were significantly lower. IFI was not associated with an increase in out-field recurrence or metastasis.
ISSN:0449-3060
1349-9157
DOI:10.1093/jrr/rry055