Aspiring to Aspirate: L2 Acquisition of English Word-Initial /p/ Over 10 Years

This short report describes a longitudinal examination of the acquisition of English-aspirated stops by an initial cohort of 24 adult Slavic-language (Russian, Ukrainian, and Croatian) speakers. All had arrived in Canada with low oral English proficiency, and all were enrolled in the same language i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLanguage and speech Vol. 68; no. 2; pp. 247 - 261
Main Authors Munro, Murray J., Derwing, Tracey M., Saito, Kazuya
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2025
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This short report describes a longitudinal examination of the acquisition of English-aspirated stops by an initial cohort of 24 adult Slavic-language (Russian, Ukrainian, and Croatian) speakers. All had arrived in Canada with low oral English proficiency, and all were enrolled in the same language instruction program at the outset. Initial bilabial stops in CVCs were recorded at eight testing times: six during the first year of the study, again at year 7, and finally at year 10. Intelligibility was evaluated through a blind listening assessment of the stop productions from the first seven testing times. Voice onset times (VOT) were measured for /p/ from all eight times. Mean /p/ intelligibility improved—mainly during a proposed Window of Maximal Opportunity for L2 speech acquisition–but remained below 100%, even after 7 years. For some speakers, early /p/ productions were minimally aspirated, with VOT increasing over time but remaining intermediate between L1 English and L1 Slavic-Language values at 10 years. However, inter-speaker variability was dramatic, with some speakers showing full intelligibility throughout the study and others showing many unintelligible productions at all times. Individual learning trajectories tended to be non-linear and often non-cumulative. Overall, these findings point to a developmental process that varies considerably from one learner to another. It also demonstrates the serious drawbacks of relying on group means to characterize the process of L2 segmental learning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0023-8309
1756-6053
1756-6053
DOI:10.1177/00238309241264296