A critical analysis of regulated river ecosystem responses to managed environmental flows from reservoirs

Summary The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the natural flow regime, resulting in abiotic and biotic changes in downstream ecosystems. Contemporary water legislation is driving increasin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFreshwater biology Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 410 - 425
Main Authors Gillespie, Ben R., Desmet, Simon, Kay, Paul, Tillotson, Martin R., Brown, Lee E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Summary The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the natural flow regime, resulting in abiotic and biotic changes in downstream ecosystems. Contemporary water legislation is driving increasing concern among environmentalists and water resource managers with respect to how these impacts can be mitigated. This has stimulated research aimed at assessing the relationship between reservoir outflow modification (i.e. managed environmental flows) and downstream ecosystem responses. We carried out a critical review and synthesis of the global literature concerning post‐impoundment reservoir outflow modification and associated downstream biotic and abiotic responses. Seventy‐six studies published between 1981 and 2012 were analysed. In contrast to previous studies of this subject, we systematically assessed the methodological quality of research to identify strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. We also undertook a novel quantification of ecosystem responses to flow modification, thus enabling identification of priorities for future research. We identified that: (i) there was a research bias towards North American and Western European studies; (ii) the majority of studies reported changes in flow magnitude (e.g. artificial floods) and primarily focused on traditionally monitored ecological groups (e.g. fish); (iii) relationships between flow, biota (e.g. macroinvertebrates) and water quality (e.g. electrical conductivity and suspended solids concentration) were evident, demonstrating the potential for managed environmental flows to manipulate river ecosystems; (iv) site‐specific factors (e.g. location, climate) are likely to be important as some ecosystem responses were inconsistent between studies (e.g. fish movement in response to increases in flow magnitude); and (v) quality of study design, methodological and analytical techniques varied, and these factors may have contributed to the reported variability of ecosystem response. To advance scientific understanding and guide future management of regulated flow regimes, we highlight a pressing need for: (i) diversification of study locations as well as flow modification and ecosystem response types assessed; (ii) a focus on understanding flow–ecosystem response relationships at regional scales; (iii) further quantitative studies to enable robust statistical analyses in future meta‐analyses; and (iv) robust monitoring of flow experiments and the use of contemporary statistical techniques to extract maximum knowledge from ecological response data.
AbstractList The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the natural flow regime, resulting in abiotic and biotic changes in downstream ecosystems. Contemporary water legislation is driving increasing concern among environmentalists and water resource managers with respect to how these impacts can be mitigated. This has stimulated research aimed at assessing the relationship between reservoir outflow modification (i.e. managed environmental flows) and downstream ecosystem responses. We carried out a critical review and synthesis of the global literature concerning post‐impoundment reservoir outflow modification and associated downstream biotic and abiotic responses. Seventy‐six studies published between 1981 and 2012 were analysed. In contrast to previous studies of this subject, we systematically assessed the methodological quality of research to identify strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. We also undertook a novel quantification of ecosystem responses to flow modification, thus enabling identification of priorities for future research. We identified that: (i) there was a research bias towards North American and Western European studies; (ii) the majority of studies reported changes in flow magnitude (e.g. artificial floods) and primarily focused on traditionally monitored ecological groups (e.g. fish); (iii) relationships between flow, biota (e.g. macroinvertebrates) and water quality (e.g. electrical conductivity and suspended solids concentration) were evident, demonstrating the potential for managed environmental flows to manipulate river ecosystems; (iv) site‐specific factors (e.g. location, climate) are likely to be important as some ecosystem responses were inconsistent between studies (e.g. fish movement in response to increases in flow magnitude); and (v) quality of study design, methodological and analytical techniques varied, and these factors may have contributed to the reported variability of ecosystem response. To advance scientific understanding and guide future management of regulated flow regimes, we highlight a pressing need for: (i) diversification of study locations as well as flow modification and ecosystem response types assessed; (ii) a focus on understanding flow–ecosystem response relationships at regional scales; (iii) further quantitative studies to enable robust statistical analyses in future meta‐analyses; and (iv) robust monitoring of flow experiments and the use of contemporary statistical techniques to extract maximum knowledge from ecological response data.
The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the natural flow regime, resulting in abiotic and biotic changes in downstream ecosystems. Contemporary water legislation is driving increasing concern among environmentalists and water resource managers with respect to how these impacts can be mitigated. This has stimulated research aimed at assessing the relationship between reservoir outflow modification (i.e. managed environmental flows) and downstream ecosystem responses. We carried out a critical review and synthesis of the global literature concerning post‐impoundment reservoir outflow modification and associated downstream biotic and abiotic responses. Seventy‐six studies published between 1981 and 2012 were analysed. In contrast to previous studies of this subject, we systematically assessed the methodological quality of research to identify strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. We also undertook a novel quantification of ecosystem responses to flow modification, thus enabling identification of priorities for future research. We identified that: (i) there was a research bias towards North American and Western European studies; (ii) the majority of studies reported changes in flow magnitude (e.g. artificial floods) and primarily focused on traditionally monitored ecological groups (e.g. fish); (iii) relationships between flow, biota (e.g. macroinvertebrates) and water quality (e.g. electrical conductivity and suspended solids concentration) were evident, demonstrating the potential for managed environmental flows to manipulate river ecosystems; (iv) site‐specific factors (e.g. location, climate) are likely to be important as some ecosystem responses were inconsistent between studies (e.g. fish movement in response to increases in flow magnitude); and (v) quality of study design, methodological and analytical techniques varied, and these factors may have contributed to the reported variability of ecosystem response. To advance scientific understanding and guide future management of regulated flow regimes, we highlight a pressing need for: (i) diversification of study locations as well as flow modification and ecosystem response types assessed; (ii) a focus on understanding flow–ecosystem response relationships at regional scales; (iii) further quantitative studies to enable robust statistical analyses in future meta‐analyses; and (iv) robust monitoring of flow experiments and the use of contemporary statistical techniques to extract maximum knowledge from ecological response data.
Summary The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the natural flow regime, resulting in abiotic and biotic changes in downstream ecosystems. Contemporary water legislation is driving increasing concern among environmentalists and water resource managers with respect to how these impacts can be mitigated. This has stimulated research aimed at assessing the relationship between reservoir outflow modification (i.e. managed environmental flows) and downstream ecosystem responses. We carried out a critical review and synthesis of the global literature concerning post‐impoundment reservoir outflow modification and associated downstream biotic and abiotic responses. Seventy‐six studies published between 1981 and 2012 were analysed. In contrast to previous studies of this subject, we systematically assessed the methodological quality of research to identify strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. We also undertook a novel quantification of ecosystem responses to flow modification, thus enabling identification of priorities for future research. We identified that: (i) there was a research bias towards North American and Western European studies; (ii) the majority of studies reported changes in flow magnitude (e.g. artificial floods) and primarily focused on traditionally monitored ecological groups (e.g. fish); (iii) relationships between flow, biota (e.g. macroinvertebrates) and water quality (e.g. electrical conductivity and suspended solids concentration) were evident, demonstrating the potential for managed environmental flows to manipulate river ecosystems; (iv) site‐specific factors (e.g. location, climate) are likely to be important as some ecosystem responses were inconsistent between studies (e.g. fish movement in response to increases in flow magnitude); and (v) quality of study design, methodological and analytical techniques varied, and these factors may have contributed to the reported variability of ecosystem response. To advance scientific understanding and guide future management of regulated flow regimes, we highlight a pressing need for: (i) diversification of study locations as well as flow modification and ecosystem response types assessed; (ii) a focus on understanding flow–ecosystem response relationships at regional scales; (iii) further quantitative studies to enable robust statistical analyses in future meta‐analyses; and (iv) robust monitoring of flow experiments and the use of contemporary statistical techniques to extract maximum knowledge from ecological response data.
1. The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the natural flow regime, resulting in abiotic and biotic changes in downstream ecosystems. Contemporary water legislation is driving increasing concern among environmentalists and water resource managers with respect to how these impacts can be mitigated. This has stimulated research aimed at assessing the relationship between reservoir outflow modification (i.e. managed environmental flows) and downstream ecosystem responses. 2. We carried out a critical review and synthesis of the global literature concerning post-impoundment reservoir outflow modification and associated downstream biotic and abiotic responses. Seventy-six studies published between 1981 and 2012 were analysed. In contrast to previous studies of this subject, we systematically assessed the methodological quality of research to identify strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. We also undertook a novel quantification of ecosystem responses to flow modification, thus enabling identification of priorities for future research. 3. We identified that: (i) there was a research bias towards North American and Western European studies; (ii) the majority of studies reported changes in flow magnitude (e.g. artificial floods) and primarily focused on traditionally monitored ecological groups (e.g. fish); (iii) relationships between flow, biota (e.g. macroinvertebrates) and water quality (e.g. electrical conductivity and suspended solids concentration) were evident, demonstrating the potential for managed environmental flows to manipulate river ecosystems; (iv) site-specific factors (e.g. location, climate) are likely to be important as some ecosystem responses were inconsistent between studies (e.g. fish movement in response to increases in flow magnitude); and (v) quality of study design, methodological and analytical techniques varied, and these factors may have contributed to the reported variability of ecosystem response. 4. To advance scientific understanding and guide future management of regulated flow regimes, we highlight a pressing need for: (i) diversification of study locations as well as flow modification and ecosystem response types assessed; (ii) a focus on understanding flow-ecosystem response relationships at regional scales; (iii) further quantitative studies to enable robust statistical analyses in future meta-analyses; and (iv) robust monitoring of flow experiments and the use of contemporary statistical techniques to extract maximum knowledge from ecological response data.
Summary The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the natural flow regime, resulting in abiotic and biotic changes in downstream ecosystems. Contemporary water legislation is driving increasing concern among environmentalists and water resource managers with respect to how these impacts can be mitigated. This has stimulated research aimed at assessing the relationship between reservoir outflow modification (i.e. managed environmental flows) and downstream ecosystem responses. We carried out a critical review and synthesis of the global literature concerning post-impoundment reservoir outflow modification and associated downstream biotic and abiotic responses. Seventy-six studies published between 1981 and 2012 were analysed. In contrast to previous studies of this subject, we systematically assessed the methodological quality of research to identify strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. We also undertook a novel quantification of ecosystem responses to flow modification, thus enabling identification of priorities for future research. We identified that: (i) there was a research bias towards North American and Western European studies; (ii) the majority of studies reported changes in flow magnitude (e.g. artificial floods) and primarily focused on traditionally monitored ecological groups (e.g. fish); (iii) relationships between flow, biota (e.g. macroinvertebrates) and water quality (e.g. electrical conductivity and suspended solids concentration) were evident, demonstrating the potential for managed environmental flows to manipulate river ecosystems; (iv) site-specific factors (e.g. location, climate) are likely to be important as some ecosystem responses were inconsistent between studies (e.g. fish movement in response to increases in flow magnitude); and (v) quality of study design, methodological and analytical techniques varied, and these factors may have contributed to the reported variability of ecosystem response. To advance scientific understanding and guide future management of regulated flow regimes, we highlight a pressing need for: (i) diversification of study locations as well as flow modification and ecosystem response types assessed; (ii) a focus on understanding flow-ecosystem response relationships at regional scales; (iii) further quantitative studies to enable robust statistical analyses in future meta-analyses; and (iv) robust monitoring of flow experiments and the use of contemporary statistical techniques to extract maximum knowledge from ecological response data.
Author Kay, Paul
Gillespie, Ben R.
Desmet, Simon
Brown, Lee E.
Tillotson, Martin R.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ben R.
  surname: Gillespie
  fullname: Gillespie, Ben R.
  email: gybrg@leeds.ac.uk
  organization: School of Geography/water@leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Simon
  surname: Desmet
  fullname: Desmet, Simon
  organization: School of Geography/water@leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Paul
  surname: Kay
  fullname: Kay, Paul
  organization: School of Geography/water@leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Martin R.
  surname: Tillotson
  fullname: Tillotson, Martin R.
  organization: School of Geography/water@leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Lee E.
  surname: Brown
  fullname: Brown, Lee E.
  organization: School of Geography/water@leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K
BookMark eNqFkc1uEzEURi1UJNLSBW9giQ0spvXP2M4sS0pbUAUbqkrdWB7PncrFYwfbScjb4yaFRSXAm7vwOd-V7neIDkIMgNAbSk5ofafjpj-hTBD5As0ol6JhLVMHaEZIKxtBFHmFDnN-IITMhWIz5M6wTa44azw2wfhtdhnHESe4X3lTYMDJrSFhsDFvc4Gp_uRlDBkyLhFP1bmvEIS1SzFMEEoNGn3cZDymuKMhraNL-TV6ORqf4fhpHqGbi4_fFlfN9dfLT4uz68a2UsnGMDaCobLru050lg7C0N7O-w5sp3oK1AoFQgxUtkr0apjTgYyqN0qpHljH-RF6t89dpvhjBbnoyWUL3psAcZU1VZQwSrig_0frDsIkl6yib5-hD3GV6sF2FOeS8-6Rer-nbIo5Jxj1MrnJpK2mRD_2o2s_etdPZU-fsdYVU1wMJRnn_2VsnIft36P1xe2H30azN1yt7ucfw6TvWiquhL79cqk_L9q79nzB9RX_Bb4Qs2U
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1061__ASCE_WR_1943_5452_0001184
crossref_primary_10_2166_ws_2023_120
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ad6a70
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_147497
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_1786
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2023_1207032
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_07891_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_fwb_13108
crossref_primary_10_1061__ASCE_WR_1943_5452_0001346
crossref_primary_10_3390_w13212947
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2021_114122
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_146769
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjfas_2022_0231
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_09_264
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2018_00045
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2025_133078
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2174
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_09_180
crossref_primary_10_1038_s43017_019_0019_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_022_05788_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2020_125732
crossref_primary_10_1080_10643389_2024_2429912
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_020_00190_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_rra_3788
crossref_primary_10_1002_rra_3624
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_017_0836_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_rra_3504
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_1530
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2022_866526
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ese_2024_100478
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2017_07_040
crossref_primary_10_1093_jcbiol_ruac043
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_13940
crossref_primary_10_1002_tqem_21516
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_015_0456_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrh_2024_101982
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_watres_2020_116651
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12050606
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_01_288
crossref_primary_10_1029_2021GL095336
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_138052
crossref_primary_10_1002_esp_5749
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2025_113130
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_024_02354_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_13241583_2022_2042060
crossref_primary_10_1002_nafm_10954
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2023_130196
crossref_primary_10_1086_699481
crossref_primary_10_1111_fwb_12553
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_1773
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2069
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2267
crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12079
crossref_primary_10_1111_fwb_13089
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2019_105445
crossref_primary_10_3390_w16050747
crossref_primary_10_1111_wej_12757
crossref_primary_10_3390_hydrology5030042
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_watres_2019_114884
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_03_383
crossref_primary_10_1061__ASCE_WR_1943_5452_0001521
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10750_020_04480_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_022_01750_4
crossref_primary_10_1029_2020WR028786
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_163569
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_017_0093_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_rra_4214
crossref_primary_10_3390_w8100461
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12330
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10750_018_3654_4
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41586_021_03262_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_133774
crossref_primary_10_1051_hydro_2016004
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41559_022_01820_0
crossref_primary_10_1002_wat2_1160
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_020_00198_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2353
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10641_021_01155_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_021_01428_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_02626667_2024_2434139
crossref_primary_10_5194_hess_21_5763_2017
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_78444_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_021_00254_8
crossref_primary_10_1134_S1995082920060176
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjfas_2022_0142
crossref_primary_10_1029_2018WR024196
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_79576_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2017_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1002_rra_4189
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jher_2021_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12216
crossref_primary_10_5194_hess_21_5443_2017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2017_11_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2020_109262
Cites_doi 10.1080/14634989808656909
10.1038/nclimate1684
10.4000/rga.450
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x
10.1002/rrr.622
10.2307/3802926
10.1007/978-94-011-0729-7
10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.5
10.1007/s00027-003-0664-7
10.1002/rrr.3450030107
10.1016/S0341-8162(83)80006-X
10.1080/02755947.2012.675946
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02179.x
10.1002/rra.2785
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x
10.1071/MF9910569
10.2305/IUCN.CH.2003.WANI.2.en
10.1002/rra.873
10.1146/annurev.es.08.110177.001351
10.1016/0022-1694(74)90083-3
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x
10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0
10.1002/rrr.652
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199607)12:4/5<433::AID-RRR415>3.0.CO;2-6
10.1007/BF02208128
10.1002/rrr.3450100219
10.1002/rra.743
10.1016/j.crte.2008.01.002
10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2
10.1890/07-0886.1
10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:AWCWWS]2.0.CO;2
10.1002/hyp.6994
10.1002/rra.1265
10.2307/1942661
10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/154/2002/529
10.1002/rra.700
10.1002/rrr.3450080119
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.044
10.1577/1548-8659(1995)124<0423:GSAGBT>2.3.CO;2
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00360.x
10.1002/rra.749
10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.034
10.1023/A:1017013725120
10.1126/science.1107887
10.1002/rrr.3450020312
10.2307/1312555
10.1126/science.1095780
10.1007/s11284-010-0693-3
10.1007/s00027-003-0662-9
10.1038/nature09440
10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.022
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02362.x
10.1002/rra.718
10.1002/rra.1052
10.1890/10-1719.1
10.1071/MF13110
10.1002/rrr.3450100226
10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0206:ESWMMR]2.0.CO;2
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02271.x
10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6
10.1680/ensu.2009.162.1.13
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.017
10.1093/beheco/arh107
10.1890/130076
10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.02.015
10.1007/BF00006822
10.1038/nclimate1665
10.1890/11-1042.1
10.1002/rra.1402
10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.002
10.2307/1313099
10.1017/S0376892900000072
10.1029/2006EO190001
10.2307/1296676
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
7QH
7SN
7SS
7UA
C1K
F1W
H95
L.G
M7N
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1111/fwb.12506
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Aqualine
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Entomology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aqualine
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
AGRICOLA

Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Entomology Abstracts
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
Ecology
Oceanography
EISSN 1365-2427
EndPage 425
ExternalDocumentID 3551804861
10_1111_fwb_12506
FWB12506
ark_67375_WNG_JC4Z4DC3_H
Genre article
GeographicLocations North America
GeographicLocations_xml – name: North America
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Yorkshire Water Services Limited (YWSL)
– fundername: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
GroupedDBID -~X
..I
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29H
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
41~
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABTAH
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AI.
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BIYOS
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CAG
COF
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
ESX
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QZG
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TWZ
UB1
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
XJT
YZZ
ZCG
ZY4
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AFWVQ
ALVPJ
AAYXX
ADXHL
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
7QH
7SN
7SS
7UA
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
C1K
F1W
H95
L.G
M7N
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4676-a22fea169b9959c1d5a1bc8b9ec97b1e1c57e55d16475b7d81d0f7ba777be2933
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0046-5070
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 18:23:55 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 03:44:02 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:53:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:02:59 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:38 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:21:44 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:55:39 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4676-a22fea169b9959c1d5a1bc8b9ec97b1e1c57e55d16475b7d81d0f7ba777be2933
Notes Yorkshire Water Services Limited (YWSL)
Appendix S1. Studies used in literature review, including study ID, location and ecosystem response type reported by each study and a complete bibliography.
istex:219149E39EA1BD72324774251E13DC0FDF484744
ArticleID:FWB12506
ark:/67375/WNG-JC4Z4DC3-H
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5100-1674
PQID 1643363392
PQPubID 36547
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1710210351
proquest_miscellaneous_1647026362
proquest_journals_1643363392
crossref_primary_10_1111_fwb_12506
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_fwb_12506
wiley_primary_10_1111_fwb_12506_FWB12506
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_JC4Z4DC3_H
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate February 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2015
  text: February 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Freshwater biology
PublicationTitleAlternate Freshw Biol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Linnik V.D., Malinin L.K., Wozniewski M., Sych R. & Dembowski P. (1998) Movements of adult sea trout Salmo trutta L. in the tailrace of a low-head dam at Wloclawek hydroelectric station on the Vistula River, Poland. Hydrobiologica, 372, 335-337.
Palmer R.W. & O'Keeffe J.H. (1990) Downstream effects of impoundments on the water chemistry of the Buffalo River (Eastern Cape), South Africa. Hydrobiologia, 202, 71-83.
Tharme R.E. (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 19, 397-441.
Arthington A.H., Bunn S.E., Poff N.L. & Naiman R.J. (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 16, 1311-1318.
Roscoe J.T. (1975) Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York. Hort. Richard and Winstou.
Webb B.W., Hannah D.M., Moore R.D., Brown L.E. & Nobilis F. (2008) Recent advances in stream and river temperature research. Hydrological Processes, 22, 902.
Cross W.F., Baxter C.V., Donner K.C., Rosi-Marshall E.J., Kennedy T.A., Hall R.O. Jr et al. (2011) Ecosystem ecology meets adaptive management: food web response to a controlled flood on the Colorado River, Glen Canyon. Ecological Applications, 21, 2016-2033.
Garcia De Jalon D., Sanchez P. & Camargo J.A. (1994) Downstream effects of a new hydropower impoundment on macrophyte, macroinvertebrate and fish communities. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 9, 235-261.
Mannes S., Robinson C., Uehlinger U., Scheurer T., Ortlepp J., Mürle U. et al. (2008) Ecological effects of a long-term flood program in a flow-regulated river. Revue de géographie alpine/Journal of Alpine Research, 96-1, 125-134.
Olden J.D., Konrad C.P., Melis T.S., Kennard M.J., Freeman M.C., Mims M.C. et al. (2014) Are large-scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 176-185.
Davies P.M., Naiman R.J., Warfe D.M., Pettit N.E., Arthington A.H. & Bunn S.E. (2014) Flow-ecology relationships: closing the loop on effective environmental flows. Marine and Freshwater Research, 65, 133-141.
Johnson D.H. (2002) The importance of replication in wildlife research. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 919.
Petts G.E. (2009) Instream flow science for sustainable river management1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45, 1071-1086.
Lytle D.A. & Poff N.L. (2004) Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 94-100.
Nakagawa S. (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 1044-1045.
Palmer M., Bernhardt E., Chornesky E., Collins S., Dobson A., Duke C. et al. (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet. Science, 304, 1251-1252.
Underwood A.J. (1991) Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Marine and Freshwater Research, 42(5), 569-587.
Meissner K., Muotka T. & Kananen I. (2002) Drift responses of larval blackflies and their invertebrate predators to short-term flow regulation. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 154, 529-542.
Jones R.I. & Barrington R.J. (1985) A study of the suspended algae in the River Derwent, Derbyshire, U.K. Hydrobiologica, 128, 255-264.
Gillespie B.R., Brown L.E. & Kay P. (2014) Effects of impoundment on macroinvertebrate community assemblages in upland streams. River Research and Applications, doi: 10.1002/rra.2785.
Saltveit S.J., Halleraker J.H., Arnekleiv J.V. & Harby A. (2001) Field experiments on stranding in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeaking. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 17, 609-622.
Power M.E., Sun A., Parker G., Dietrich W.E. & Wootton J.T. (1995) Hydraulic food-chain models. BioScience, 45, 159-167.
Wellmeyer J.L., Slattery M.C. & Phillips J.D. (2005) Quantifying downstream impacts of impoundment on flow regime and channel planform, lower Trinity River, Texas. Geomorphology, 69, 1-13.
Dyson M., Bergkap G. & Scanlon J. (2003) Flow: The Essentials of Environmental Flows. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
R (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, v 2.15.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Petts G.E. & Pratts J.D. (1983) Channel changes following reservoir construction on a lowland English river. Catena, 10, 77-85.
Bernez I., Daniel H., Haury J. & Ferreira M.T. (2004) Combined effects of environmental factors and regulation on macrophyte vegetation along three rivers in western France. River Research and Applications, 20, 43-59.
Jakob C., Robinson C.T. & Uehlinger U. (2003) Longitudinal effects of experimental floods on stream benthos downstream of a large dam. Aquatic Science, 65, 223-231.
Olden J.D. & Poff N.L. (2003) Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications, 19, 101-121.
Lutz D.S. (1995) Gas supersaturation and gas bubble trauma in fish downstream from a midwestern reservoir. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 124, 423-436.
Macdonald J.S., Morrison J. & Patterson D.A. (2012) The efficacy of reservoir flow regulation for cooling migration temperature for sockeye salmon in the Nechako River watershed of British Columbia. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 32, 415-427.
Petts G.E., Armitage P.D. & Castella E. (1993) Physical habitat changes and macroinvertebrate response to river regulation: the river Rede, UK. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 8, 167-178.
Nilsson C., Reidy C.A., Dynesius M. & Revenga C. (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science (New York, N.Y.), 308, 405-408.
Poff N.L. & Zimmerman J.K.H. (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 55, 194-205.
Shafroth P.B., Wilcox A.C., Lytle D.A., Hickey J.T., Andersen D.C., Beauchamp V.B. et al. (2010) Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river. Freshwater Biology, 55, 68-85.
Baran P., Delacoste M., Dauba F., Lascaux J.M., Belaud A. & Lek S. (1995) Effects of reduced flow on brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) populations downstream dams in French Pyrenees. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 10, 347-361.
Higgs G. & Petts G.E. (1988) Hydrological changes and river regulation in the UK. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 2, 349-368.
Bunn S.E. & Arthington A.H. (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management, 30, 492-507.
Poff N.L., Richter B.D., Arthington A.H., Bunn S.E., Naiman R.J., Kendy E. et al. (2010) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology, 55, 147-170.
Dickson N.E., Carrivick J.L. & Brown L.E. (2012) Flow regulation alters alpine river thermal regimes. Journal of Hydrology, 464-465, 505-516.
Robinson C.T. (2012) Long-term changes in community assembly, resistance, and resilience following experimental floods. Ecological Applications, 22, 1949-1961.
Uehlinger U., Kawecka B. & Robinson C.T. (2003) Effects of experimental floods on periphyton and stream metabolism below a high dam in the Swiss Alps (River Spöl). Aquatic Sciences, 65(3), 199-209.
Xu K., Milliman J.D., Yang Z. & Wang H. (2006) Yangtze Sediment Decline Partly From Three Gorges Dam. EOS Transactions, 87, 185-196.
Glover B.J. & Johnson P. (1974) Variations in the natural chemical concentration of river water during flood flows, and the lag effect. Journal of Hydrology, 22, 303-316.
Rolls R.J. & Arthington A.H. (2014) How do low magnitudes of hydrologic alteration impact riverine fish populations and assemblage characteristics? Ecological Indicators, 39, 179-188.
Ledger M.E., Brown L.E., Edwards F., Milner A.M. & Woodward G. (2013) Drought alters the structure and functioning of complex food webs. Nature Climate Change, 3, 223-227.
Acreman M.C. & Ferguson A.J.D. (2010) Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Freshwater Biology, 55, 32-48.
Olden J.D. & Naiman R.J. (2010) Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshwater Biology, 55, 86-107.
Connell D. & Grafton R. (2008) Planning for water security in the Murray-darling basin. Public Policy, 3, 67.
Rolls R.J., Boulton A.J., Growns I.O. & Maxwell S.E. (2011) Response by fish assemblages to an environmental flow release in a temperate coastal Australian river: a paired catchment analysis. River Research and Applications, 27, 867-880.
Baxter R.M. (1977) Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 8, 255-283.
Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N., Walker N.J., Saveliev A.A. & Smith G.M. (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York.
Lehner B., R-Liermann C., Revenga C., Vörösmarty C., Fekete B., Crouzet P. et al. (2008) High resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river flow management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Source: GWSP Digital Water Atlas. Map 81: GRanD Database (V1.0). Available at: http://atlas.gwsp.org.
Englund G. & Malmqvist B. (1996) Effects of flow regulation, habitat area and isolation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of rapids in north Swedish rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 12, 433-445.
Todd C.R., Ryan T., Nicol S.J. & Bearlin A.R. (2005) The impact of cold water releases on the critical period of post-spawning survival and its implications for Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii): a case study of the Mitta Mitta River, southeastern Australia. River Resear
2009; 45
2010; 55
1993; 8
2004; 20
2013; 3
2006; 79
2002; 154
1997; 47
2010; 467
2011; 61
2003; 13
1983; 10
1975
2005; 21
1985; 128
2008; 3
2003; 19
2008; 340
2003; 53
2014; 65
2005; 69
2010; 26
1990
1984; 54
1991; 42
1987
2011; 21
2008; 24
2005; 308
1984
1995; 124
2009; 162
2008; 22
2001; 17
2011; 26
2005; 71
2011; 27
2012; 22
2014; 12
1989; 3
2012; 464–465
1990; 202
2000; 27
2002; 30
2010
2000; L327
2006; 16
2008; 18
1995; 10
2009
2008
1996
2007
1995
2004
2003
2002
2008; 96‐1
2004; 304
2012; 32
1996; 12
1998; 372
1994; 9
1988; 2
1974; 24
1974; 22
2004; 19
2006; 87
2004; 15
1995; 45
2002; 66
2014
1998; 1
2013
2014; 39
1977; 8
2003; 65
e_1_2_6_51_1
e_1_2_6_74_1
e_1_2_6_53_1
e_1_2_6_32_1
Meissner K. (e_1_2_6_47_1) 2002; 154
e_1_2_6_70_1
e_1_2_6_93_1
e_1_2_6_30_1
e_1_2_6_72_1
e_1_2_6_91_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
e_1_2_6_34_1
e_1_2_6_17_1
e_1_2_6_55_1
e_1_2_6_78_1
e_1_2_6_15_1
e_1_2_6_38_1
e_1_2_6_57_1
e_1_2_6_62_1
e_1_2_6_85_1
EC (European Commission) (e_1_2_6_19_1) 2000; 327
Petts G.E. (e_1_2_6_59_1) 1984
e_1_2_6_64_1
e_1_2_6_43_1
e_1_2_6_20_1
e_1_2_6_41_1
e_1_2_6_60_1
Roscoe J.T. (e_1_2_6_76_1) 1975
e_1_2_6_83_1
Klein‐Breteler J.G.P. (e_1_2_6_36_1) 1990
e_1_2_6_9_1
Garcia De Jalon D. (e_1_2_6_21_1) 1994; 9
e_1_2_6_7_1
Beschta R.L. (e_1_2_6_10_1) 1987
e_1_2_6_24_1
e_1_2_6_49_1
e_1_2_6_3_1
e_1_2_6_22_1
R (e_1_2_6_68_1) 2013
Lehner B. (e_1_2_6_40_1) 2008
e_1_2_6_66_1
e_1_2_6_89_1
e_1_2_6_45_1
e_1_2_6_26_1
Arthington A.H. (e_1_2_6_5_1) 2014
Hauer R.F. (e_1_2_6_28_1) 1996
e_1_2_6_52_1
e_1_2_6_73_1
Tharme R.E. (e_1_2_6_82_1) 2003; 19
e_1_2_6_54_1
e_1_2_6_75_1
e_1_2_6_31_1
e_1_2_6_50_1
e_1_2_6_71_1
e_1_2_6_92_1
e_1_2_6_90_1
Connell D. (e_1_2_6_13_1) 2008; 3
Smith E.P. (e_1_2_6_81_1) 2002
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_35_1
e_1_2_6_12_1
e_1_2_6_33_1
e_1_2_6_18_1
e_1_2_6_39_1
e_1_2_6_56_1
e_1_2_6_77_1
e_1_2_6_16_1
e_1_2_6_37_1
e_1_2_6_58_1
e_1_2_6_79_1
e_1_2_6_63_1
e_1_2_6_84_1
e_1_2_6_42_1
e_1_2_6_65_1
e_1_2_6_86_1
e_1_2_6_80_1
e_1_2_6_61_1
e_1_2_6_8_1
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_6_1
e_1_2_6_25_1
e_1_2_6_48_1
e_1_2_6_23_1
USEPA (e_1_2_6_87_1) 2004
e_1_2_6_2_1
e_1_2_6_29_1
e_1_2_6_44_1
e_1_2_6_67_1
e_1_2_6_88_1
e_1_2_6_27_1
e_1_2_6_46_1
e_1_2_6_69_1
References_xml – reference: Cross W.F., Baxter C.V., Donner K.C., Rosi-Marshall E.J., Kennedy T.A., Hall R.O. Jr et al. (2011) Ecosystem ecology meets adaptive management: food web response to a controlled flood on the Colorado River, Glen Canyon. Ecological Applications, 21, 2016-2033.
– reference: Roscoe J.T. (1975) Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York. Hort. Richard and Winstou.
– reference: Shields F.D., Simon A. & Steffen L.J. (2000) Reservoir effects on downstream river channel migration. Environmental Conservation, 27, 54-66.
– reference: Xu K., Milliman J.D., Yang Z. & Wang H. (2006) Yangtze Sediment Decline Partly From Three Gorges Dam. EOS Transactions, 87, 185-196.
– reference: Poff N.L., Allan J.D., Bain M.B., Karr J.R., Prestegaard K.L., Richter B.D. et al. (1997) The natural flow regime. BioScience, 47, 769-784.
– reference: Rolls R.J., Boulton A.J., Growns I.O. & Maxwell S.E. (2011) Response by fish assemblages to an environmental flow release in a temperate coastal Australian river: a paired catchment analysis. River Research and Applications, 27, 867-880.
– reference: Dickson N.E., Carrivick J.L. & Brown L.E. (2012) Flow regulation alters alpine river thermal regimes. Journal of Hydrology, 464-465, 505-516.
– reference: Konrad C.P., Olden J.D., Lytle D.A., Melis T.S., Schmidt J.C., Bray E.N. et al. (2011) Large-scale flow experiments for managing river systems. BioScience, 61, 948-959.
– reference: Petts G.E. (2009) Instream flow science for sustainable river management1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45, 1071-1086.
– reference: Bunn S.E. & Arthington A.H. (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management, 30, 492-507.
– reference: Macdonald J.S., Morrison J. & Patterson D.A. (2012) The efficacy of reservoir flow regulation for cooling migration temperature for sockeye salmon in the Nechako River watershed of British Columbia. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 32, 415-427.
– reference: King J. & Louw D. (1998) Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa using the Building Block Methodology. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 1, 109-124.
– reference: Shafroth P.B., Wilcox A.C., Lytle D.A., Hickey J.T., Andersen D.C., Beauchamp V.B. et al. (2010) Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river. Freshwater Biology, 55, 68-85.
– reference: Naiman R.J., Latterell J.J., Pettit N.E. & Olden J.D. (2008) Flow variability and the biophysical vitality of river systems. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 340, 629-643.
– reference: Petts G.E. & Pratts J.D. (1983) Channel changes following reservoir construction on a lowland English river. Catena, 10, 77-85.
– reference: Power M.E., Sun A., Parker G., Dietrich W.E. & Wootton J.T. (1995) Hydraulic food-chain models. BioScience, 45, 159-167.
– reference: R (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, v 2.15.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
– reference: Palmer M., Bernhardt E., Chornesky E., Collins S., Dobson A., Duke C. et al. (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet. Science, 304, 1251-1252.
– reference: Allan J.D. & Castillo M.M. (1995) Stream Ecology Structure and Function of Running Waters. Springer, London etc: Chapman a. Hall.
– reference: Jones R.I. & Barrington R.J. (1985) A study of the suspended algae in the River Derwent, Derbyshire, U.K. Hydrobiologica, 128, 255-264.
– reference: Arthington A.H., Bunn S.E., Poff N.L. & Naiman R.J. (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 16, 1311-1318.
– reference: Nakagawa S. (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 1044-1045.
– reference: Petts G.E., Armitage P.D. & Castella E. (1993) Physical habitat changes and macroinvertebrate response to river regulation: the river Rede, UK. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 8, 167-178.
– reference: Reich P., et al. (2010) Examining the ecological consequences of restoring flow intermittency to artificially perennial lowland streams: Patterns and predictions from the Broken-Boosey creek system in northern Victoria, Australia. River Research and Applications, 26(5), 529-545.
– reference: Cummins K.W. (1974) Structure and function of stream ecosystems. BioScience, 24, 631-641.
– reference: Arthington A.H. (2014) Environmental Flows: Saving Rivers in the Third Millennium. University of California Press, Berkeley.
– reference: Davies P.M., Naiman R.J., Warfe D.M., Pettit N.E., Arthington A.H. & Bunn S.E. (2014) Flow-ecology relationships: closing the loop on effective environmental flows. Marine and Freshwater Research, 65, 133-141.
– reference: Olden J.D. & Poff N.L. (2003) Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications, 19, 101-121.
– reference: Palmer R.W. & O'Keeffe J.H. (1990) Downstream effects of impoundments on the water chemistry of the Buffalo River (Eastern Cape), South Africa. Hydrobiologia, 202, 71-83.
– reference: Parrish J.D., Braun D.P. & Unnasch R.S. (2003) Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. BioScience, 53, 851-860.
– reference: Glover B.J. & Johnson P. (1974) Variations in the natural chemical concentration of river water during flood flows, and the lag effect. Journal of Hydrology, 22, 303-316.
– reference: Underwood A.J. (1991) Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Marine and Freshwater Research, 42(5), 569-587.
– reference: Petts G.E. (1984) Impounded Rivers: Perspectives for Ecological Management. Wiley, Chichester West Sussex; New York.
– reference: Petts G.E. & Gurnell A.M. (2005) Dams and geomorphology: research progress and future directions. Geomorphology, 71, 27.
– reference: Sear D.A. (1995) Morphological and sedimentological changes in a gravel-bed river following 12 years of flow regulation for hydropower. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 10, 247-264.
– reference: Lytle D.A. & Poff N.L. (2004) Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 94-100.
– reference: Garcia De Jalon D., Sanchez P. & Camargo J.A. (1994) Downstream effects of a new hydropower impoundment on macrophyte, macroinvertebrate and fish communities. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 9, 235-261.
– reference: Rolls R.J. & Arthington A.H. (2014) How do low magnitudes of hydrologic alteration impact riverine fish populations and assemblage characteristics? Ecological Indicators, 39, 179-188.
– reference: Korman J., Wiele S.M. & Torizzo M. (2004) Modelling effects of discharge on habitat quality and dispersal of juvenile humpback chub (Gila cypha) in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. River Research and Applications, 20, 379-400.
– reference: Webb B.W., Hannah D.M., Moore R.D., Brown L.E. & Nobilis F. (2008) Recent advances in stream and river temperature research. Hydrological Processes, 22, 902.
– reference: Growns I.O. & Growns J.E. (2001) Ecological effects of flow regulation on macroinvertebrate and periphytic diatom assemblages in the Hawkesbury-Nepean River, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 17, 275-293.
– reference: James A.B.W., Dewson Z.S. & Death R.G. (2008) The effect of experimental flow reductions on macroinvertebrate drift in natural and streamside channels. River Research and Applications, 24, 22-35.
– reference: Meissner K., Muotka T. & Kananen I. (2002) Drift responses of larval blackflies and their invertebrate predators to short-term flow regulation. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 154, 529-542.
– reference: Gillespie B.R., Brown L.E. & Kay P. (2014) Effects of impoundment on macroinvertebrate community assemblages in upland streams. River Research and Applications, doi: 10.1002/rra.2785.
– reference: Górski K., Winter H.V., De Leeuw J.J., Minin A.E. & Nagelkerke L.A.J. (2010) Fish spawning in a large temperate floodplain: the role of flooding and temperature. Freshwater Biology, 55, 1509-1519.
– reference: Johnson D.H. (2002) The importance of replication in wildlife research. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 919.
– reference: Linnik V.D., Malinin L.K., Wozniewski M., Sych R. & Dembowski P. (1998) Movements of adult sea trout Salmo trutta L. in the tailrace of a low-head dam at Wloclawek hydroelectric station on the Vistula River, Poland. Hydrobiologica, 372, 335-337.
– reference: Uehlinger U., Kawecka B. & Robinson C.T. (2003) Effects of experimental floods on periphyton and stream metabolism below a high dam in the Swiss Alps (River Spöl). Aquatic Sciences, 65(3), 199-209.
– reference: Connell D. & Grafton R. (2008) Planning for water security in the Murray-darling basin. Public Policy, 3, 67.
– reference: Ledger M.E., Brown L.E., Edwards F., Milner A.M. & Woodward G. (2013) Drought alters the structure and functioning of complex food webs. Nature Climate Change, 3, 223-227.
– reference: Milner A.M., Robertson A., McDermott M.J., Klaar M. & Brown L.E. (2013) Major flood disturbance alters river ecosystem evolution. Nature Climate Change, 3, 137-141.
– reference: Englund G. & Malmqvist B. (1996) Effects of flow regulation, habitat area and isolation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of rapids in north Swedish rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 12, 433-445.
– reference: Olden J.D., Konrad C.P., Melis T.S., Kennard M.J., Freeman M.C., Mims M.C. et al. (2014) Are large-scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 176-185.
– reference: Robinson C.T. & Uehlinger U. (2008) Experimental floods cause ecosystem regime shift in a regulated river. Ecological Applications, 18, 511-526.
– reference: Todd C.R., Ryan T., Nicol S.J. & Bearlin A.R. (2005) The impact of cold water releases on the critical period of post-spawning survival and its implications for Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii): a case study of the Mitta Mitta River, southeastern Australia. River Research and Applications, 21, 1035-1052.
– reference: Robinson C.T., Uehlinger U. & Monaghan M.T. (2004) Stream ecosystem response to multiple experimental floods from a reservoir. River Research and Applications, 20, 359-377.
– reference: Nilsson C., Reidy C.A., Dynesius M. & Revenga C. (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science (New York, N.Y.), 308, 405-408.
– reference: USEPA (2004) Wadeable Streams Assessment Field Operations Manual. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA841-B-04-004.
– reference: Graf W.L. (2006) Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Geomorphology, 79, 336.
– reference: EC (European Commission) (2000) Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Official Journal of the European Communities, L327, 1-72.
– reference: Baran P., Delacoste M., Dauba F., Lascaux J.M., Belaud A. & Lek S. (1995) Effects of reduced flow on brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) populations downstream dams in French Pyrenees. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 10, 347-361.
– reference: Baxter R.M. (1977) Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 8, 255-283.
– reference: Gustard A. (1989) Compensation flows in the UK: a hydrological review. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 3, 49-59.
– reference: Lehner B., R-Liermann C., Revenga C., Vörösmarty C., Fekete B., Crouzet P. et al. (2008) High resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river flow management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Source: GWSP Digital Water Atlas. Map 81: GRanD Database (V1.0). Available at: http://atlas.gwsp.org.
– reference: Dyson M., Bergkap G. & Scanlon J. (2003) Flow: The Essentials of Environmental Flows. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
– reference: Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N., Walker N.J., Saveliev A.A. & Smith G.M. (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York.
– reference: Acreman M.C. & Ferguson A.J.D. (2010) Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Freshwater Biology, 55, 32-48.
– reference: Hurlbert S.H. (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54, 187-211.
– reference: Robinson C.T. (2012) Long-term changes in community assembly, resistance, and resilience following experimental floods. Ecological Applications, 22, 1949-1961.
– reference: Acreman M.C., Aldrick J., Binnie C., Black A., Cowx I., Dawson H. et al. (2009) Environmental flows from dams: the water framework directive. Engineering Sustainability, 162, 13-22.
– reference: Wellmeyer J.L., Slattery M.C. & Phillips J.D. (2005) Quantifying downstream impacts of impoundment on flow regime and channel planform, lower Trinity River, Texas. Geomorphology, 69, 1-13.
– reference: Mannes S., Robinson C., Uehlinger U., Scheurer T., Ortlepp J., Mürle U. et al. (2008) Ecological effects of a long-term flood program in a flow-regulated river. Revue de géographie alpine/Journal of Alpine Research, 96-1, 125-134.
– reference: Tharme R.E. (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 19, 397-441.
– reference: Higgs G. & Petts G.E. (1988) Hydrological changes and river regulation in the UK. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 2, 349-368.
– reference: Poff N.L., Richter B.D., Arthington A.H., Bunn S.E., Naiman R.J., Kendy E. et al. (2010) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology, 55, 147-170.
– reference: Jakob C., Robinson C.T. & Uehlinger U. (2003) Longitudinal effects of experimental floods on stream benthos downstream of a large dam. Aquatic Science, 65, 223-231.
– reference: Saltveit S.J., Halleraker J.H., Arnekleiv J.V. & Harby A. (2001) Field experiments on stranding in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeaking. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 17, 609-622.
– reference: Olden J.D. & Naiman R.J. (2010) Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshwater Biology, 55, 86-107.
– reference: Lutz D.S. (1995) Gas supersaturation and gas bubble trauma in fish downstream from a midwestern reservoir. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 124, 423-436.
– reference: Poff N.L. & Zimmerman J.K.H. (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 55, 194-205.
– reference: Richter B.D., Mathews R., Harrison D.L. & Wigington R. (2003) Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications, 13, 206-224.
– reference: Naiman R.J. & Dudgeon D. (2011) Global alteration of freshwaters: influences on human and environmental well-being. Ecological Research, 26, 865-873.
– reference: Bernez I., Daniel H., Haury J. & Ferreira M.T. (2004) Combined effects of environmental factors and regulation on macrophyte vegetation along three rivers in western France. River Research and Applications, 20, 43-59.
– reference: Vörösmarty C.J., McIntyre P.B., Gessner M.O., Dudgeon D., Prusevich A., Green P. et al. (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555-561.
– volume: 65
  start-page: 223
  year: 2003
  end-page: 231
  article-title: Longitudinal effects of experimental floods on stream benthos downstream of a large dam
  publication-title: Aquatic Science
– volume: 27
  start-page: 867
  year: 2011
  end-page: 880
  article-title: Response by fish assemblages to an environmental flow release in a temperate coastal Australian river: a paired catchment analysis
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– year: 2009
– volume: 304
  start-page: 1251
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1252
  article-title: Ecology for a crowded planet
  publication-title: Science
– year: 2014
  article-title: Effects of impoundment on macroinvertebrate community assemblages in upland streams
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1071
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1086
  article-title: Instream flow science for sustainable river management1
  publication-title: JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
– volume: 32
  start-page: 415
  year: 2012
  end-page: 427
  article-title: The efficacy of reservoir flow regulation for cooling migration temperature for sockeye salmon in the Nechako River watershed of British Columbia
  publication-title: North American Journal of Fisheries Management
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1949
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1961
  article-title: Long‐term changes in community assembly, resistance, and resilience following experimental floods
  publication-title: Ecological Applications
– start-page: 219
  year: 1990
  end-page: 228
– volume: 55
  start-page: 86
  year: 2010
  end-page: 107
  article-title: Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity
  publication-title: Freshwater Biology
– volume: 27
  start-page: 54
  year: 2000
  end-page: 66
  article-title: Reservoir effects on downstream river channel migration
  publication-title: Environmental Conservation
– start-page: 93
  year: 1996
  end-page: 106
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1
  year: 2005
  end-page: 13
  article-title: Quantifying downstream impacts of impoundment on flow regime and channel planform, lower Trinity River, Texas
  publication-title: Geomorphology
– start-page: 191
  year: 1987
  end-page: 232
– volume: 20
  start-page: 43
  year: 2004
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Combined effects of environmental factors and regulation on macrophyte vegetation along three rivers in western France
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– year: 1975
– year: 2014
– volume: 24
  start-page: 631
  year: 1974
  end-page: 641
  article-title: Structure and function of stream ecosystems
  publication-title: BioScience
– volume: L327
  start-page: 1
  year: 2000
  end-page: 72
  article-title: Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
  publication-title: Official Journal of the European Communities
– volume: 55
  start-page: 68
  year: 2010
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river
  publication-title: Freshwater Biology
– volume: 65
  start-page: 133
  year: 2014
  end-page: 141
  article-title: Flow–ecology relationships: closing the loop on effective environmental flows
  publication-title: Marine and Freshwater Research
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1509
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1519
  article-title: Fish spawning in a large temperate floodplain: the role of flooding and temperature
  publication-title: Freshwater Biology
– volume: 55
  start-page: 32
  year: 2010
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive
  publication-title: Freshwater Biology
– volume: 372
  start-page: 335
  year: 1998
  end-page: 337
  article-title: Movements of adult sea trout L. in the tailrace of a low‐head dam at Wloclawek hydroelectric station on the Vistula River, Poland
  publication-title: Hydrobiologica
– volume: 8
  start-page: 167
  year: 1993
  end-page: 178
  article-title: Physical habitat changes and macroinvertebrate response to river regulation: the river Rede, UK
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
– volume: 54
  start-page: 187
  year: 1984
  end-page: 211
  article-title: Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments
  publication-title: Ecological Monographs
– volume: 22
  start-page: 902
  year: 2008
  article-title: Recent advances in stream and river temperature research
  publication-title: Hydrological Processes
– volume: 3
  start-page: 67
  year: 2008
  article-title: Planning for water security in the Murray‐darling basin
  publication-title: Public Policy
– volume: 55
  start-page: 147
  year: 2010
  end-page: 170
  article-title: The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards
  publication-title: Freshwater Biology
– volume: 45
  start-page: 159
  year: 1995
  end-page: 167
  article-title: Hydraulic food‐chain models
  publication-title: BioScience
– year: 2004
– volume: 162
  start-page: 13
  year: 2009
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Environmental flows from dams: the water framework directive
  publication-title: Engineering Sustainability
– year: 2008
  article-title: High resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river flow management
  publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
– volume: 79
  start-page: 336
  year: 2006
  article-title: Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers
  publication-title: Geomorphology
– volume: 1
  start-page: 109
  year: 1998
  end-page: 124
  article-title: Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa using the Building Block Methodology
  publication-title: Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management
– volume: 26
  start-page: 865
  year: 2011
  end-page: 873
  article-title: Global alteration of freshwaters: influences on human and environmental well‐being
  publication-title: Ecological Research
– volume: 340
  start-page: 629
  year: 2008
  end-page: 643
  article-title: Flow variability and the biophysical vitality of river systems
  publication-title: Comptes Rendus Geoscience
– volume: 202
  start-page: 71
  year: 1990
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Downstream effects of impoundments on the water chemistry of the Buffalo River (Eastern Cape), South Africa
  publication-title: Hydrobiologia
– volume: 30
  start-page: 492
  year: 2002
  end-page: 507
  article-title: Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity
  publication-title: Environmental Management
– volume: 26
  start-page: 529
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  end-page: 545
  article-title: Examining the ecological consequences of restoring flow intermittency to artificially perennial lowland streams: Patterns and predictions from the Broken—Boosey creek system in northern Victoria, Australia
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– volume: 61
  start-page: 948
  year: 2011
  end-page: 959
  article-title: Large‐scale flow experiments for managing river systems
  publication-title: BioScience
– volume: 12
  start-page: 176
  year: 2014
  end-page: 185
  article-title: Are large‐scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems?
  publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
– volume: 55
  start-page: 194
  year: 2010
  end-page: 205
  article-title: Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows
  publication-title: Freshwater Biology
– volume: 20
  start-page: 379
  year: 2004
  end-page: 400
  article-title: Modelling effects of discharge on habitat quality and dispersal of juvenile humpback chub (Gila cypha) in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– start-page: 141
  year: 2002
  end-page: 148
– volume: 71
  start-page: 27
  year: 2005
  article-title: Dams and geomorphology: research progress and future directions
  publication-title: Geomorphology
– volume: 10
  start-page: 77
  year: 1983
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Channel changes following reservoir construction on a lowland English river
  publication-title: Catena
– volume: 65
  start-page: 199
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 209
  article-title: Effects of experimental floods on periphyton and stream metabolism below a high dam in the Swiss Alps (River Spöl)
  publication-title: Aquatic Sciences
– year: 2007
– volume: 19
  start-page: 94
  year: 2004
  end-page: 100
  article-title: Adaptation to natural flow regimes
  publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution
– volume: 47
  start-page: 769
  year: 1997
  end-page: 784
  article-title: The natural flow regime
  publication-title: BioScience
– year: 2003
– volume: 9
  start-page: 235
  year: 1994
  end-page: 261
  article-title: Downstream effects of a new hydropower impoundment on macrophyte, macroinvertebrate and fish communities
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management
– volume: 154
  start-page: 529
  year: 2002
  end-page: 542
  article-title: Drift responses of larval blackflies and their invertebrate predators to short‐term flow regulation
  publication-title: Archiv für Hydrobiologie
– volume: 10
  start-page: 247
  year: 1995
  end-page: 264
  article-title: Morphological and sedimentological changes in a gravel‐bed river following 12 years of flow regulation for hydropower
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management
– volume: 308
  start-page: 405
  year: 2005
  end-page: 408
  article-title: Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems
  publication-title: Science (New York, N.Y.)
– volume: 24
  start-page: 22
  year: 2008
  end-page: 35
  article-title: The effect of experimental flow reductions on macroinvertebrate drift in natural and streamside channels
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– volume: 17
  start-page: 275
  year: 2001
  end-page: 293
  article-title: Ecological effects of flow regulation on macroinvertebrate and periphytic diatom assemblages in the Hawkesbury‐Nepean River, Australia
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1044
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1045
  article-title: A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias
  publication-title: Behavioral Ecology
– volume: 10
  start-page: 347
  year: 1995
  end-page: 361
  article-title: Effects of reduced flow on brown trout ( L.) populations downstream dams in French Pyrenees
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management
– volume: 12
  start-page: 433
  year: 1996
  end-page: 445
  article-title: Effects of flow regulation, habitat area and isolation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of rapids in north Swedish rivers
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
– volume: 19
  start-page: 101
  year: 2003
  end-page: 121
  article-title: Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– year: 2010
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1035
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1052
  article-title: The impact of cold water releases on the critical period of post‐spawning survival and its implications for Murray cod ( peelii): a case study of the Mitta Mitta River, southeastern Australia
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– volume: 467
  start-page: 555
  year: 2010
  end-page: 561
  article-title: Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity
  publication-title: Nature
– year: 1984
– volume: 21
  start-page: 2016
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2033
  article-title: Ecosystem ecology meets adaptive management: food web response to a controlled flood on the Colorado River, Glen Canyon
  publication-title: Ecological Applications
– volume: 22
  start-page: 303
  year: 1974
  end-page: 316
  article-title: Variations in the natural chemical concentration of river water during flood flows, and the lag effect
  publication-title: Journal of Hydrology
– volume: 124
  start-page: 423
  year: 1995
  end-page: 436
  article-title: Gas supersaturation and gas bubble trauma in fish downstream from a midwestern reservoir
  publication-title: Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
– volume: 18
  start-page: 511
  year: 2008
  end-page: 526
  article-title: Experimental floods cause ecosystem regime shift in a regulated river
  publication-title: Ecological Applications
– volume: 66
  start-page: 919
  year: 2002
  article-title: The importance of replication in wildlife research
  publication-title: The Journal of Wildlife Management
– volume: 87
  start-page: 185
  year: 2006
  end-page: 196
  article-title: Yangtze Sediment Decline Partly From Three Gorges Dam
  publication-title: EOS Transactions
– volume: 19
  start-page: 397
  year: 2003
  end-page: 441
  article-title: A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management
– volume: 3
  start-page: 223
  year: 2013
  end-page: 227
  article-title: Drought alters the structure and functioning of complex food webs
  publication-title: Nature Climate Change
– year: 2002
– volume: 39
  start-page: 179
  year: 2014
  end-page: 188
  article-title: How do low magnitudes of hydrologic alteration impact riverine fish populations and assemblage characteristics?
  publication-title: Ecological Indicators
– volume: 464–465
  start-page: 505
  year: 2012
  end-page: 516
  article-title: Flow regulation alters alpine river thermal regimes
  publication-title: Journal of Hydrology
– volume: 17
  start-page: 609
  year: 2001
  end-page: 622
  article-title: Field experiments on stranding in juvenile Atlantic salmon ( ) and brown trout ( ) during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeaking
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
– volume: 128
  start-page: 255
  year: 1985
  end-page: 264
  article-title: A study of the suspended algae in the River Derwent, Derbyshire, U.K
  publication-title: Hydrobiologica
– volume: 20
  start-page: 359
  year: 2004
  end-page: 377
  article-title: Stream ecosystem response to multiple experimental floods from a reservoir
  publication-title: River Research and Applications
– volume: 3
  start-page: 137
  year: 2013
  end-page: 141
  article-title: Major flood disturbance alters river ecosystem evolution
  publication-title: Nature Climate Change
– year: 1995
– start-page: 107
  year: 2002
  end-page: 133
– volume: 96‐1
  start-page: 125
  year: 2008
  end-page: 134
  article-title: Ecological effects of a long‐term flood program in a flow‐regulated river
  publication-title: Revue de géographie alpine/Journal of Alpine Research
– volume: 53
  start-page: 851
  year: 2003
  end-page: 860
  article-title: Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas
  publication-title: BioScience
– volume: 13
  start-page: 206
  year: 2003
  end-page: 224
  article-title: Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity
  publication-title: Ecological Applications
– volume: 2
  start-page: 349
  year: 1988
  end-page: 368
  article-title: Hydrological changes and river regulation in the UK
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1311
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1318
  article-title: The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems
  publication-title: Ecological Applications
– volume: 8
  start-page: 255
  year: 1977
  end-page: 283
  article-title: Environmental effects of dams and impoundments
  publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
– volume: 3
  start-page: 49
  year: 1989
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Compensation flows in the UK: a hydrological review
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
– year: 2013
– volume: 42
  start-page: 569
  issue: 5
  year: 1991
  end-page: 587
  article-title: Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations
  publication-title: Marine and Freshwater Research
– ident: e_1_2_6_35_1
  doi: 10.1080/14634989808656909
– ident: e_1_2_6_39_1
  doi: 10.1038/nclimate1684
– ident: e_1_2_6_45_1
  doi: 10.4000/rga.450
– ident: e_1_2_6_65_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
  doi: 10.1002/rrr.622
– ident: e_1_2_6_33_1
  doi: 10.2307/3802926
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-0729-7
– ident: e_1_2_6_37_1
  doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.5
– ident: e_1_2_6_84_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00027-003-0664-7
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  doi: 10.1002/rrr.3450030107
– year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_6_40_1
  article-title: High resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river flow management
  publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
– ident: e_1_2_6_63_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0341-8162(83)80006-X
– start-page: 191
  volume-title: Streamside Management: Forestry and Fisheries Interactions
  year: 1987
  ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_44_1
  doi: 10.1080/02755947.2012.675946
– ident: e_1_2_6_54_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02179.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.2785
– volume-title: Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
  year: 1975
  ident: e_1_2_6_76_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x
– volume: 9
  start-page: 235
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
  article-title: Downstream effects of a new hydropower impoundment on macrophyte, macroinvertebrate and fish communities
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management
– ident: e_1_2_6_85_1
  doi: 10.1071/MF9910569
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2003.WANI.2.en
– ident: e_1_2_6_83_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.873
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.08.110177.001351
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(74)90083-3
– ident: e_1_2_6_66_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0
– ident: e_1_2_6_77_1
  doi: 10.1002/rrr.652
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199607)12:4/5<433::AID-RRR415>3.0.CO;2-6
– ident: e_1_2_6_57_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF02208128
– ident: e_1_2_6_78_1
  doi: 10.1002/rrr.3450100219
– volume: 327
  start-page: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  article-title: Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
  publication-title: Official Journal of the European Communities
– ident: e_1_2_6_73_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.743
– ident: e_1_2_6_50_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2008.01.002
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2
– start-page: 219
  volume-title: Developments in Electric Fishing
  year: 1990
  ident: e_1_2_6_36_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_72_1
  doi: 10.1890/07-0886.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_58_1
  doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:AWCWWS]2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_90_1
  doi: 10.1002/hyp.6994
– ident: e_1_2_6_69_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.1265
– ident: e_1_2_6_30_1
  doi: 10.2307/1942661
– volume-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_6_68_1
– volume: 154
  start-page: 529
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_6_47_1
  article-title: Drift responses of larval blackflies and their invertebrate predators to short‐term flow regulation
  publication-title: Archiv für Hydrobiologie
  doi: 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/154/2002/529
– ident: e_1_2_6_55_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.700
– volume: 3
  start-page: 67
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
  article-title: Planning for water security in the Murray‐darling basin
  publication-title: Public Policy
– ident: e_1_2_6_61_1
  doi: 10.1002/rrr.3450080119
– volume-title: Environmental Flows: Saving Rivers in the Third Millennium
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.044
– ident: e_1_2_6_42_1
  doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1995)124<0423:GSAGBT>2.3.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_60_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00360.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_38_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.749
– volume: 19
  start-page: 397
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_6_82_1
  article-title: A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers
  publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management
– volume-title: Impounded Rivers: Perspectives for Ecological Management
  year: 1984
  ident: e_1_2_6_59_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_91_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.034
– ident: e_1_2_6_41_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1017013725120
– ident: e_1_2_6_52_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1107887
– ident: e_1_2_6_29_1
  doi: 10.1002/rrr.3450020312
– ident: e_1_2_6_67_1
  doi: 10.2307/1312555
– ident: e_1_2_6_56_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1095780
– ident: e_1_2_6_49_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11284-010-0693-3
– ident: e_1_2_6_31_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00027-003-0662-9
– ident: e_1_2_6_88_1
  doi: 10.1038/nature09440
– start-page: 93
  volume-title: Methods in Stream Ecology
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_6_28_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.022
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02362.x
– volume-title: Wadeable Streams Assessment Field Operations Manual
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_87_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.718
– ident: e_1_2_6_32_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.1052
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.1890/10-1719.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_86_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.1071/MF13110
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.1002/rrr.3450100226
– ident: e_1_2_6_89_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_70_1
  doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0206:ESWMMR]2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_79_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02271.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_93_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
  doi: 10.1680/ensu.2009.162.1.13
– ident: e_1_2_6_74_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.017
– ident: e_1_2_6_51_1
  doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh107
– ident: e_1_2_6_53_1
  doi: 10.1890/130076
– ident: e_1_2_6_62_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.02.015
– ident: e_1_2_6_34_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00006822
– ident: e_1_2_6_46_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_48_1
  doi: 10.1038/nclimate1665
– start-page: 141
  volume-title: Encyclopedia of Environmetrics
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_6_81_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_71_1
  doi: 10.1890/11-1042.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_75_1
  doi: 10.1002/rra.1402
– ident: e_1_2_6_43_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.002
– ident: e_1_2_6_64_1
  doi: 10.2307/1313099
– ident: e_1_2_6_80_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0376892900000072
– ident: e_1_2_6_92_1
  doi: 10.1029/2006EO190001
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
  doi: 10.2307/1296676
SSID ssj0008572
Score 2.452334
Snippet Summary The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact...
The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the...
Summary The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact...
1. The flow regime of a river is fundamental in determining its ecological characteristics. Impoundment of rivers has been documented to severely impact the...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 410
SubjectTerms analytical methods
Aquatic ecosystems
Biota
climate
Downstream
Ecological monitoring
ecosystem response
Ecosystems
electrical conductivity
environmental flows
Environmentalists
experimental design
floods
Flow alteration
Freshwater
Impoundments
laws and regulations
Legislation
Macroinvertebrates
managers
meta-analysis
monitoring
Natural flow
Quantitative research
Regulated flow
reservoir
Reservoirs
River ecology
River regulations
Rivers
Statistical analysis
Studies
Suspended solids
Water law
Water outflow
Water quality
Water resources management
Title A critical analysis of regulated river ecosystem responses to managed environmental flows from reservoirs
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-JC4Z4DC3-H/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Ffwb.12506
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1643363392
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1647026362
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1710210351
Volume 60
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3faxQxEA6lIojgb_FqlSgivuxx6W6SPXyqZ8-jYAWxtIgQkmwCpWW37N5R27_emSS7XkVFfAtkdtkkM5Mvm5lvCHnlfMW0zWXGYfPNCqEnGfhAnyF4YLIqfW4xOfnjgVgcFvvH_HiDvO1zYSI_xPDDDS0j-Gs0cG26NSP3F2YMu3Og28ZYLQREn39SR5VcRqbwQmSAeSaJVQijeIYnr-1FN3Bav18DmutwNew387vkW_-lMczkdLxamrG9-oXE8T-Hco_cSTiU7kbFuU82XP2A3IyVKS-htWdT6_Yn63SdiK0fkpNdalN1BKoToQltPG1jTXtX0RYjPSicaiNJNPSEKFzX0WVDY7BsRdfy6-BF_qy56ChmuqA0eK_mpO0ekcP53pfZIkvlGjIL3lZkemfHO83E1CCHmWUV18zY0kydnUrDHLNcOs4rZDDjBvSAVRMvjZZSGgeoI39MNuumdk8INdaLUk5Nya0FPCdKbY0UGsbrbemEH5E3_cIpm7jMsaTGmerPNDClKkzpiLwcRM8jgcfvhF6H1R8kdHuKEW-Sq6ODD2p_Vnwt3s9ytRiR7V49VDL2TsGA8lzkoOwj8mLoBjPFuxddu2YVZCQcdwEu_EUG0R7Dq10YX9CXP3-xmh-9C42tfxd9Sm4B3OMx5nybbC7blXsGkGppngfb-QGPgR3_
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1taxQxEA6lRRTB9-Jpq1FE_LLHpbtJ9sAv7dnzrO0J0tJSKCHJJlBadmXvjqq_3plkd72KivgtkNklLzPJk2TmGUJeOV8wbVOZcNh8k0zoQQJroE8QPDBZ5D61GJx8MBWTo2zvhJ-skLdtLEzkh-gu3NAywnqNBo4X0ktW7q9MH7Zn5Ntew4ze4UD1-Sd5VM5l5ArPRAKoZ9DwCqEfT_fptd1oDQf26zWouQxYw44zvkvO2rZGR5OL_mJu-vb7LzSO_9uZe-ROA0XpdtSd-2TFlQ_IjZic8huUdm1Tuv3JOl023NYPyfk2tU2CBKobThNaeVrHtPauoDU6e1A42EaeaKgJjrhuRucVjf6yBV0KsYMf-cvqakYx2AWlYQGrzuvZI3I03j0cTZImY0NiYcEVid7a8k4zMTRIY2ZZwTUzNjdDZ4fSMMcsl47zAknMuAFVYMXAS6OllMYB8EjXyWpZle4xocZ6kcuhybm1AOlErq2RQkN_vc2d8D3ypp05ZRs6c8yqcanaYw0MqQpD2iMvO9EvkcPjd0Kvw_R3Erq-QKc3ydXx9L3aG2Wn2btRqiY9stHqh2rsfaagQ2kqUtD3HnnRVYOl4vOLLl21CDISTryAGP4ig4CP4esu9C8ozJ9brMbHO6Hw5N9Fn5Obk8ODfbX_YfrxKbkF6I9HF_QNsjqvF24TENbcPAuG9ANR7SIa
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3faxQxEA6lRRGh_sarVaOI-LLHpbtJ9vCp3vU8q54ilpYihCSbQGnZLXt3VP3rndlk16uoiG-BzC6bZGbyZTPzDSHPnC-YtqlMOGy-SSb0IAEf6BMED0wWuU8tJie_n4npQbZ_xI_WyMs2FybwQ3Q_3NAyGn-NBn5e-BUj9xemD7sz0m1vZGKQo0qPP_3kjsq5DFThmUgA9AwirRCG8XSPXtqMNnBev15Cmqt4tdlwJjfIl_ZTQ5zJaX-5MH37_RcWx_8cy02yGYEo3Q2ac4usufI2uRJKU36D1p6NresfrNNlZLa-Q052qY3lEaiOjCa08rQORe1dQWsM9aBwrA0s0dDThOG6OV1UNETLFnQlwQ5e5M-qiznFVBeUBvdVndTzu-Rgsvd5NE1ivYbEgrsVid7Z8U4zMTRIYmZZwTUzNjdDZ4fSMMcsl47zAinMuAFFYMXAS6OllMYB7EjvkfWyKt19Qo31IpdDk3NrAdCJXFsjhYbxeps74XvkRbtwykYyc6ypcabaQw1MqWqmtEeedqLngcHjd0LPm9XvJHR9iiFvkqvD2Wu1P8qOs_EoVdMe2W7VQ0VrnysYUJqKFLS9R5503WCnePmiS1ctGxkJ513AC3-RQbjH8G4Xxtfoy5-_WE0OXzWNrX8XfUyufhxP1Ls3s7cPyDWAfjzEn2-T9UW9dA8BXi3Mo8aMfgD14yDS
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+critical+analysis+of+regulated+river+ecosystem+responses+to+managed+environmental+flows+from+reservoirs&rft.jtitle=Freshwater+biology&rft.au=Gillespie%2C+Ben+R&rft.au=Desmet%2C+Simon&rft.au=Kay%2C+Paul&rft.au=Tillotson%2C+Martin+R&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2+p.410-425&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=425&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Ffwb.12506&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0046-5070&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0046-5070&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0046-5070&client=summon