Clinical comparison of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar vs. unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 15347 - 8
• Main Authors: Xiao, Long, Zhou, Jianhong, Zhong, Qin, Zhang, Xiaobo, Cao, Xuefei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 02.05.2025; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/378/2597/2600; 692/308/2779; 692/698/1688/1366/1823; Adult; Aged; Diskectomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects; Diskectomy, Percutaneous - methods; Endoscopy - methods; Female; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery; Length of Stay; Lumbar disc herniation (LDH); Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Minimally invasive spine surgery; multidisciplinary; Operative Time; Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD); Retrospective Studies; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Treatment Outcome; Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED); Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD); Lumbar disc herniation (LDH); Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED); Minimally invasive spine surgery

This study investigated the comparative effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in managing lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Clinical data from 146 LDH patients treated surgically at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou...