The use of dose quantities in radiological protection: ICRP publication 147 Ann ICRP 50(1) 2021

• Published in: Journal of radiological protection Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 410 - 422
• Main Authors: Harrison, J D, Balonov, M, Bochud, F, Martin, C J, Menzel, H-G, Smith-Bindman, R, Ortiz-López, P, Simmonds, J R, Wakeford, R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England IOP Publishing 01.06.2021
• Subjects: dose quantities; effective dose; ICRP; stochastic effects; tissue reactions; Dose quantities; ICRP; Stochastic effects; Effective dose; Tissue reactions
• ISSN: 0952-4746; 1361-6498
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abe548

The International Commission on Radiological Protection has recently published a report (ICRP Publication 147; 2021) on the use of dose quantities in radiological protection, under the same authorship as this Memorandum. Here, we present a brief summary of the main elements of the report. ICRP Publication 147 consolidates and clarifies the explanations provided in the 2007 ICRP Recommendations (Publication 103) but reaches conclusions that go beyond those presented in Publication 103. Further guidance is provided on the scientific basis for the control of radiation risks using dose quantities in occupational, public and medical applications. It is emphasised that best estimates of risk to individuals will use organ/tissue absorbed doses, appropriate relative biological effectiveness factors and dose-risk models for specific health effects. However, bearing in mind uncertainties including those associated with risk projection to low doses or low dose rates, it is concluded that in the context of radiological protection, effective dosemay be consideredas an approximate indicator of possible risk of stochastic health effects following low-level exposure to ionising radiation. In this respect, it should also be recognised that lifetime cancer risks vary with age at exposure, sex and population group. The ICRP report also concludes that equivalent dose is not needed as a protection quantity. Dose limits for the avoidance of tissue reactions for the skin, hands and feet, and lens of the eye will be more appropriately set in terms of absorbed dose rather than equivalent dose.