Optimistic Environmental Messaging Increases State Optimism and in vivo Pro-environmental Behavior

Despite recent empirical interest, the links between optimism and pessimism with pro-environmental behavior (PEB) remain equivocal. This research is characterized by a reliance on cross-sectional data, a focus on trait-level at the neglect of state-level optimism–pessimism, and assessments of retros...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 13; p. 856063
Main Authors MacKinnon, Megan, Davis, Adam C., Arnocky, Steven
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 29.04.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite recent empirical interest, the links between optimism and pessimism with pro-environmental behavior (PEB) remain equivocal. This research is characterized by a reliance on cross-sectional data, a focus on trait-level at the neglect of state-level optimism–pessimism, and assessments of retrospective self-reported ecological behavior that are subject to response bias. To attend to these gaps, 140 North American adults ( M age  = 34; SD  = 11.60; 44% female) were experimentally primed with bogus optimistic or pessimistic environmental news articles, and then asked to report their levels of state optimism–pessimism, intentions to purchase green products, in vivo PEB (donating to WWF and providing contact information to join an environmental organization), and support for geoengineering technologies. Results confirmed that optimistic (versus pessimistic) environmental messaging enhanced the expression of state optimism, which then contributed to PEB and support for geoengineering. These results have important implications for the framing of environmental messaging intended to promote ecologically conscious behavior.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Haywantee Ramkissoon, University of Derby, United Kingdom; Diana Gregory-Smith, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
This article was submitted to Environmental Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Paola Passafaro, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856063