The preanalytical optimization of blood cultures: a review and the clinical importance of benchmarking in 5 Belgian hospitals

• Published in: Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease Vol. 73; no. 1; pp. 1 - 8
• Main Authors: Willems, Elise, Smismans, Annick, Cartuyvels, Reinoud, Coppens, Guy, Van Vaerenbergh, Kristien, Van den Abeele, Anne-Marie, Frans, Johan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.05.2012; Elsevier
• Subjects: Belgium; Benchmarking; Benchmarking - methods; Biological and medical sciences; Blood - microbiology; Blood cultures; Blood volume; Clinical indications; Follow-up and surveillance; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hospitals; Humans; Infectious Disease; Infectious diseases; Internal Medicine; Medical sciences; Microbiological Techniques - methods; Microbiological Techniques - standards; Microbiology; Preanalytical phase; Quality control; Rejection; Sepsis - diagnosis; Sepsis - microbiology; Technique; Timing; Transport and temperature; Belgium; Rejection; Clinical indications; Blood volume; Follow-up and surveillance; Quality control; Preanalytical phase; Benchmarking; Timing; Technique; Blood cultures; Transport and temperature; Temperature; Review; Optimization; Blood; Infection; Blood culture
• ISSN: 0732-8893; 1879-0070
• DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.01.009

Abstract Bloodstream infections remain a major challenge in medicine. Optimal detection of pathogens is only possible if the quality of preanalytical factors is thoroughly controlled. Since the laboratory is responsible for this preanalytical phase, the quality control of critical factors should be integrated in its quality control program. The numerous recommendations regarding blood culture collection contain controversies. Only an unambiguous guideline permits standardization and interlaboratory quality control. We present an evidence-based concise guideline of critical preanalytical determinants for blood culture collection and summarize key performance indicators with their concomitant target values. In an attempt to benchmark, we compared the true-positive rate, contamination rate, and collected blood volume of blood culture bottles in 5 Belgian hospital laboratories. The true-positive blood culture rate fell within previously defined acceptation criteria by Baron et al. (2005) in all 5 hospitals, whereas the contamination rate exceeded the target value in 4 locations. Most unexpected, in each of the 5 laboratories, more than one third of the blood culture bottles were incorrectly filled, irrespective of the manufacturer of the blood culture vials. As a consequence of this shortcoming, one manufacturer recently developed an automatic blood volume monitoring system. In conclusion, clear recommendations for standardized blood culture collection combined with quality control of critical factors of the preanalytical phase are essential for diagnostic blood culture improvement.