Voxel-Wise Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Clinical Outcome of Cochlear Implantation: Retrospective Study

To evaluate retrospectively, the possible difference in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metric of fractional anisotropy (FA) between good and poor surgical outcome cochlear implantation (CI) patients using investigator-independent voxel-wise analysis. Eighteen patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology Vol. 5; no. Suppl 1; pp. S37 - S42
Main Authors Chang, Yongmin, Lee, Hye-Ryung, Paik, Jong-Soo, Lee, Kyu-Yup, Lee, Sang-Heun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 01.04.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1976-8710
2005-0720
2005-0720
DOI10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To evaluate retrospectively, the possible difference in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metric of fractional anisotropy (FA) between good and poor surgical outcome cochlear implantation (CI) patients using investigator-independent voxel-wise analysis. Eighteen patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age, 5.9 years) with profound sensorineural hearing loss underwent DTI scans using a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner. Among the 18 patients, 10 patients with categories of auditory performance (CAP) score over 6 were classified into the good outcome group and 8 patients with CAP score below 6 were classified into the poor outcome group. The diffusion tensor scalar measure was calculated from the eigenvalues of the tensor on a voxel-by-voxel basis from each subject and two-sample t-test evaluation between good and poor outcome subjects were performed for each voxel of FA values, across the entire brain, with a voxel-wise intensity threshold of P<0.0005 (uncorrected) and a contiguous cluster size of 64 voxels. Individual values of FA were measured by using the region-of-interest based analysis for correlation analysis with CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores. Two-sample t-test evaluation using SPM voxel-wise analysis found significantly higher FA values at the several brain areas including Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum, and auditory tract in good outcome subjects compared to poor outcome subjects. Correlation analyses between FA and CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores revealed strong correlations at medial geniculate nucleus, Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum and auditory tract. Investigator-independent voxel-based analysis of DTI image demonstrated that good outcome subjects showed better neural integrity at brain areas associated with language and auditory functions, suggesting that the conservation of microstructural integrity of these brain areas is important. Preoperative functional imaging may be helpful for CI.
AbstractList ObjectivesTo evaluate retrospectively, the possible difference in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metric of fractional anisotropy (FA) between good and poor surgical outcome cochlear implantation (CI) patients using investigator-independent voxel-wise analysis.MethodsEighteen patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age, 5.9 years) with profound sensorineural hearing loss underwent DTI scans using a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner. Among the 18 patients, 10 patients with categories of auditory performance (CAP) score over 6 were classified into the good outcome group and 8 patients with CAP score below 6 were classified into the poor outcome group. The diffusion tensor scalar measure was calculated from the eigenvalues of the tensor on a voxel-by-voxel basis from each subject and two-sample t-test evaluation between good and poor outcome subjects were performed for each voxel of FA values, across the entire brain, with a voxel-wise intensity threshold of P<0.0005 (uncorrected) and a contiguous cluster size of 64 voxels. Individual values of FA were measured by using the region-of-interest based analysis for correlation analysis with CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores.ResultsTwo-sample t-test evaluation using SPM voxel-wise analysis found significantly higher FA values at the several brain areas including Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum, and auditory tract in good outcome subjects compared to poor outcome subjects. Correlation analyses between FA and CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores revealed strong correlations at medial geniculate nucleus, Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum and auditory tract.ConclusionInvestigator-independent voxel-based analysis of DTI image demonstrated that good outcome subjects showed better neural integrity at brain areas associated with language and auditory functions, suggesting that the conservation of microstructural integrity of these brain areas is important. Preoperative functional imaging may be helpful for CI.
To evaluate retrospectively, the possible difference in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metric of fractional anisotropy (FA) between good and poor surgical outcome cochlear implantation (CI) patients using investigator-independent voxel-wise analysis.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate retrospectively, the possible difference in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metric of fractional anisotropy (FA) between good and poor surgical outcome cochlear implantation (CI) patients using investigator-independent voxel-wise analysis.Eighteen patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age, 5.9 years) with profound sensorineural hearing loss underwent DTI scans using a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner. Among the 18 patients, 10 patients with categories of auditory performance (CAP) score over 6 were classified into the good outcome group and 8 patients with CAP score below 6 were classified into the poor outcome group. The diffusion tensor scalar measure was calculated from the eigenvalues of the tensor on a voxel-by-voxel basis from each subject and two-sample t-test evaluation between good and poor outcome subjects were performed for each voxel of FA values, across the entire brain, with a voxel-wise intensity threshold of P<0.0005 (uncorrected) and a contiguous cluster size of 64 voxels. Individual values of FA were measured by using the region-of-interest based analysis for correlation analysis with CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores.METHODSEighteen patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age, 5.9 years) with profound sensorineural hearing loss underwent DTI scans using a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner. Among the 18 patients, 10 patients with categories of auditory performance (CAP) score over 6 were classified into the good outcome group and 8 patients with CAP score below 6 were classified into the poor outcome group. The diffusion tensor scalar measure was calculated from the eigenvalues of the tensor on a voxel-by-voxel basis from each subject and two-sample t-test evaluation between good and poor outcome subjects were performed for each voxel of FA values, across the entire brain, with a voxel-wise intensity threshold of P<0.0005 (uncorrected) and a contiguous cluster size of 64 voxels. Individual values of FA were measured by using the region-of-interest based analysis for correlation analysis with CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores.Two-sample t-test evaluation using SPM voxel-wise analysis found significantly higher FA values at the several brain areas including Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum, and auditory tract in good outcome subjects compared to poor outcome subjects. Correlation analyses between FA and CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores revealed strong correlations at medial geniculate nucleus, Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum and auditory tract.RESULTSTwo-sample t-test evaluation using SPM voxel-wise analysis found significantly higher FA values at the several brain areas including Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum, and auditory tract in good outcome subjects compared to poor outcome subjects. Correlation analyses between FA and CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores revealed strong correlations at medial geniculate nucleus, Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum and auditory tract.Investigator-independent voxel-based analysis of DTI image demonstrated that good outcome subjects showed better neural integrity at brain areas associated with language and auditory functions, suggesting that the conservation of microstructural integrity of these brain areas is important. Preoperative functional imaging may be helpful for CI.CONCLUSIONInvestigator-independent voxel-based analysis of DTI image demonstrated that good outcome subjects showed better neural integrity at brain areas associated with language and auditory functions, suggesting that the conservation of microstructural integrity of these brain areas is important. Preoperative functional imaging may be helpful for CI.
To evaluate retrospectively, the possible difference in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metric of fractional anisotropy (FA) between good and poor surgical outcome cochlear implantation (CI) patients using investigator-independent voxel-wise analysis. Eighteen patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age, 5.9 years) with profound sensorineural hearing loss underwent DTI scans using a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner. Among the 18 patients, 10 patients with categories of auditory performance (CAP) score over 6 were classified into the good outcome group and 8 patients with CAP score below 6 were classified into the poor outcome group. The diffusion tensor scalar measure was calculated from the eigenvalues of the tensor on a voxel-by-voxel basis from each subject and two-sample t-test evaluation between good and poor outcome subjects were performed for each voxel of FA values, across the entire brain, with a voxel-wise intensity threshold of P<0.0005 (uncorrected) and a contiguous cluster size of 64 voxels. Individual values of FA were measured by using the region-of-interest based analysis for correlation analysis with CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores. Two-sample t-test evaluation using SPM voxel-wise analysis found significantly higher FA values at the several brain areas including Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum, and auditory tract in good outcome subjects compared to poor outcome subjects. Correlation analyses between FA and CAP scores, open sentence and open word scores revealed strong correlations at medial geniculate nucleus, Broca's area, genu of the corpus callosum and auditory tract. Investigator-independent voxel-based analysis of DTI image demonstrated that good outcome subjects showed better neural integrity at brain areas associated with language and auditory functions, suggesting that the conservation of microstructural integrity of these brain areas is important. Preoperative functional imaging may be helpful for CI.
Author Lee, Kyu-Yup
Chang, Yongmin
Lee, Hye-Ryung
Paik, Jong-Soo
Lee, Sang-Heun
AuthorAffiliation 4 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
3 Department of Medical & Biological Engineering, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
2 Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
– name: 1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
– name: 4 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
– name: 3 Department of Medical & Biological Engineering, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yongmin
  surname: Chang
  fullname: Chang, Yongmin
  organization: Department of Molecular Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea., Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea., Department of Medical & Biological Engineering, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hye-Ryung
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Hye-Ryung
  organization: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jong-Soo
  surname: Paik
  fullname: Paik, Jong-Soo
  organization: Department of Medical & Biological Engineering, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Kyu-Yup
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Kyu-Yup
  organization: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Sang-Heun
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Sang-Heun
  organization: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22701772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kktv1DAUhS1URKeFH8AGZckmwY_YTlggVcNrpEqVmAJLy3Fupq4ce4idivn3OEyLKBIrW_Y537Guzxk68cEDQi8Jrhir6RsDoaKY0IpXW1JtmXyCVhRjXmJJ8QlakVaKspEEn6KzGG8xFpzj-hk6pVRiIiVdoelb-Amu_G4jFBdeu0O0sQhD8d4Owxxt8MU1-BimYjPqnfW7Ysj7tbPeGu2KqzmZMMJiWAdz40Avwr3TPumUzW-LL5CmEPdgkr2DYpvm_vAcPR20i_Difj1HXz9-uF5_Li-vPm3WF5elqQVPJWOs69qG6rrlQMTQ4V7wjmhKMe0ADG9qzKnWQlDRNkBaI_qeA4gGd1y0mJ2jzZHbB32r9pMd9XRQQVv1-yBMO6WnZI0DxRvQHcNtb_q-HgamGw2NJlIwljNBZta7I2s_dyP0BnyatHsEfXzj7Y3ahTuVAW3bLI95fQ-Ywo8ZYlKjjQZcHhWEOSqCKW4YoTXP0ld_Z_0Jefi0LJBHgcmjjRMMytjjvHO0dZmllnqoXA-11ENxtSUq1yM7yT_OB_j_Pb8AUIrAcw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_braincomms_fcaf086
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_850245
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurad_2023_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_01263_9
crossref_primary_10_1177_0194599817739838
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0140643
crossref_primary_10_1002_jdn_10071
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2020_565445
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00405_019_05477_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_brb3_2773
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnsys_2014_00087
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2020_00206
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heares_2015_01_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dcn_2019_100654
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2014_12_025
crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_85983
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2020_117462
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnimg_2024_1341607
crossref_primary_10_1002_wsbm_1469
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70268-5
10.1093/brain/awh674
10.1097/01.wnr.0000134584.10207.1a
10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00041-7
10.1002/hbm.20703
10.1002/jmri.1076
10.1016/j.neuro.2010.11.004
10.1159/000078392
10.1016/0006-8993(94)01335-F
10.1002/jmri.20102
10.1002/jmri.21438
10.1093/cercor/11.9.868
10.1073/pnas.1730169100
10.1038/nn.2326
10.1002/mrm.1910390610
10.1002/jmri.20296
10.1002/nbm.782
10.1006/nimg.2001.0770
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2012 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2012
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2012 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2012
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2005-0720
EndPage S42
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_58eab309dcdd4ff3a8ae8a1763365be7
PMC3369980
22701772
10_3342_ceo_2012_5_S1_S37
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 29B
2WC
5-W
53G
5GY
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ACYCR
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
C1A
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EF.
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
KQ8
M48
O5R
O5S
OK1
PGMZT
RNS
RPM
TR2
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-333bb982a495e16fb0d65b1a2202beec584052aa662698e19c6dd5ee680b56903
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1976-8710
2005-0720
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:22:08 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:07:43 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 03:56:49 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:51:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:46 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:03:19 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue Suppl 1
Keywords Cochlear implantation
Surgical outcome
Diffusion tensor imaging
Hearing loss
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c465t-333bb982a495e16fb0d65b1a2202beec584052aa662698e19c6dd5ee680b56903
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37
PMID 22701772
PQID 1020831245
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_58eab309dcdd4ff3a8ae8a1763365be7
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3369980
proquest_miscellaneous_1020831245
pubmed_primary_22701772
crossref_citationtrail_10_3342_ceo_2012_5_S1_S37
crossref_primary_10_3342_ceo_2012_5_S1_S37
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher_xml – name: Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
References Kim (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref10) 2011; 32
Shibata (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref18) 2007; 28
Moore (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref1) 2009; 12
Hasan (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref5) 2005; 21
Scherfler (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref9) 2006; 129
Le Bihan (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref15) 2001; 13
Watkins (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref11) 2001; 11
Eckert (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref12) 2005; 41
Ono (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref16) 1995; 671
Karas (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref14) 2003; 18
Emmorey (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref13) 2003; 100
Rai (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref17) 2008; 28
Bhagat (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref7) 2004; 20
Chang (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref6) 2004; 15
Basser (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref3) 1998; 39
Beaulieu (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref4) 2002; 15
Bookstein (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref19) 2001; 14
Svirsky (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref2) 2004; 9
Silk (10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref8) 2009; 30
17296987 - AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):243-9
11276097 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Apr;13(4):534-46
11532891 - Cereb Cortex. 2001 Sep;11(9):868-77
18626948 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Aug;28(2):334-41
16272163 - Brain. 2006 Feb;129(Pt 2):538-42
15871596 - Cortex. 2005 Jun;41(3):304-15
12725765 - Neuroimage. 2003 Apr;18(4):895-907
7728526 - Brain Res. 1995 Feb 6;671(1):141-8
9621916 - Magn Reson Med. 1998 Jun;39(6):928-34
15269946 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Aug;20(2):216-27
19471266 - Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):686-91
15257130 - Neuroreport. 2004 Aug 6;15(11):1699-703
12904582 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 19;100(17):10049-54
11707101 - Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1454-62
12489094 - NMR Biomed. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(7-8):435-55
19107752 - Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2757-65
15205550 - Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):224-33
21111757 - Neurotoxicology. 2011 Jan;32(1):100-9
15906348 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jun;21(6):735-43
References_xml – volume: 41
  start-page: 304
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref12
  publication-title: Cortex
  doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70268-5
– volume: 129
  start-page: 538
  issue: Pt 2
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref9
  publication-title: Brain
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awh674
– volume: 28
  start-page: 243
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref18
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1699
  issue: 11
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref6
  publication-title: Neuroreport
  doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000134584.10207.1a
– volume: 18
  start-page: 895
  issue: 4
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref14
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00041-7
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2757
  issue: 9
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref8
  publication-title: Hum Brain Mapp
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.20703
– volume: 13
  start-page: 534
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref15
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.1076
– volume: 32
  start-page: 100
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref10
  publication-title: Neurotoxicology
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.11.004
– volume: 9
  start-page: 224
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref2
  publication-title: Audiol Neurootol
  doi: 10.1159/000078392
– volume: 671
  start-page: 141
  issue: 1
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref16
  publication-title: Brain Res
  doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)01335-F
– volume: 20
  start-page: 216
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref7
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.20102
– volume: 28
  start-page: 334
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref17
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.21438
– volume: 11
  start-page: 868
  issue: 9
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref11
  publication-title: Cereb Cortex
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.9.868
– volume: 100
  start-page: 10049
  issue: 17
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref13
  publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1730169100
– volume: 12
  start-page: 686
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref1
  publication-title: Nat Neurosci
  doi: 10.1038/nn.2326
– volume: 39
  start-page: 928
  issue: 6
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref3
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390610
– volume: 21
  start-page: 735
  issue: 6
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref5
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.20296
– volume: 15
  start-page: 435
  issue: 7-8
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref4
  publication-title: NMR Biomed
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.782
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1454
  issue: 6
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S37_ref19
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0770
– reference: 16272163 - Brain. 2006 Feb;129(Pt 2):538-42
– reference: 11532891 - Cereb Cortex. 2001 Sep;11(9):868-77
– reference: 15871596 - Cortex. 2005 Jun;41(3):304-15
– reference: 12904582 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 19;100(17):10049-54
– reference: 11276097 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Apr;13(4):534-46
– reference: 15269946 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Aug;20(2):216-27
– reference: 18626948 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Aug;28(2):334-41
– reference: 15906348 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jun;21(6):735-43
– reference: 17296987 - AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):243-9
– reference: 19107752 - Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2757-65
– reference: 19471266 - Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):686-91
– reference: 21111757 - Neurotoxicology. 2011 Jan;32(1):100-9
– reference: 9621916 - Magn Reson Med. 1998 Jun;39(6):928-34
– reference: 7728526 - Brain Res. 1995 Feb 6;671(1):141-8
– reference: 15205550 - Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):224-33
– reference: 12725765 - Neuroimage. 2003 Apr;18(4):895-907
– reference: 15257130 - Neuroreport. 2004 Aug 6;15(11):1699-703
– reference: 11707101 - Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1454-62
– reference: 12489094 - NMR Biomed. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(7-8):435-55
SSID ssj0065504
Score 1.9626236
Snippet To evaluate retrospectively, the possible difference in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metric of fractional anisotropy (FA) between good and poor surgical...
ObjectivesTo evaluate retrospectively, the possible difference in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metric of fractional anisotropy (FA) between good and poor...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage S37
SubjectTerms Cochlear implantation
Diffusion tensor imaging
Hearing loss
Original
Surgical outcome
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1baxQxFA7SB_FFvDtqSwSfhNnmPjO-tdVShSq4rfYt5HKGLqwzsp0F_feezGXZFdEXX2cSEs4lOV9O8h1CXjlwrvQVyyFWJleFh9wpg46nIyhVGwyx04H--Udzdqk-XOmrrVJf6U7YQA88CO5Ql-C8ZFUMMaq6lq50UDqObiGN9tC_I2cVm8DUsAYbjLuHfHJh0N_5mM-UUonD0L_542KmZ3M-m6cC6Fs7Uk_c_6do8_dLk1u70Ok9cncMH-nRMO375BY0D8jt8zFB_pCsvrQ_YJl_XdwAnfhGaFvTt4u6XqeDMXqBuLVd0fff-vJEFGNWOnKDLumndYcGCKnDSRuuU0UJmuiD3fA-qXlDP0O3aqfXmTRdQvz5iFyevrs4OcvHsgp5UEZ3uZTS-6oUDrERcFN7FlGS3AnBhAcIGJIwLZwziHWqEngVTIwawJTMawTT8jHZa9oGnhJaF6hqUN5Ih7AKoVvBYxm81qE2hfQhI2wSrQ0j53gqfbG0iD2SNixqwyZtWG3n3KI2MvJ60-X7QLjxt8bHSV-bhokru_-AFmRHC7L_sqCMvJy0bdG3UsLENdCub3BckQqxCaUz8mTQ_mYoIQpczAqRkWLHLnbmsvunWVz3_N04LoJc9ux_TP45uZMkMtwlekH2utUa9jFM6vxB7xG_ANdpEmc
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Voxel-Wise Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Clinical Outcome of Cochlear Implantation: Retrospective Study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22701772
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1020831245
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3369980
https://doaj.org/article/58eab309dcdd4ff3a8ae8a1763365be7
Volume 5
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1bb9MwFLbGkBAvE3e6wWQknpBSEt-SICEEg2kgFSS6wt4sX05YpS7Z0lTa_j3HuVQUVTzxmsRx4s_HPp-P_R1CXhowJrN5HIHPVSRSC5ERCg1PehCiUOhihwX9yVd1MhNfzuTZDhnSW_UNuNxK7UI-qVm9GF9f3bxDg38bGCcX7LVrT_ElbCzH02Q85ektchsnJhW42ESsgwoKnfEuyJwqHASSPsi5_RUb01Sr5r_NBf17J-UfU9PxPbLX-5T0fdcJ7pMdKB-QO5M-av6Q1D-qa1hEP-dLoIMICa0K-nFeFKuwWkZPkcxWNf180eYsoujI0l4wdEG_rRrslRAKHFXuPKSZoEFT2HSHlso39Ds0dTUc2aRhZ-LNIzI7_nR6dBL1uRYiJ5RsIs65tXnGDBImSFRhY6-kTQxjMbMADv2UWDJjFBKgPIMkd8p7CaCy2Epk2Pwx2S2rEp4SWqSIPwiruEGuhXwuTXzmrJSuUCm3bkTioWm164XIQz6MhUZCEtDQiIYOaGipp4lGNEbk1brIZafC8a-HPwS81g8GAe32QlX_0r09apmBsTzOvfNeFAU3mYHMJDjacvxvwJe8GNDWaHAhimJKqFZLrJeF7GxMyBF50qG_roqxFEe4lI1IutEvNr5l8045P29FvbFeZL7x_v_4-ANyN7RIt8HoGdlt6hU8R9-psYftmsNhaxe_AUg-Gso
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voxel-Wise+Analysis+of+Diffusion+Tensor+Imaging+for+Clinical+Outcome+of+Cochlear+Implantation%3A+Retrospective+Study&rft.jtitle=Clinical+and+experimental+otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Yongmin+Chang&rft.au=Hye-Ryung+Lee&rft.au=Jong-Soo+Paik&rft.au=Kyu-Yup+Lee&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.pub=Korean+Society+of+Otorhinolaryngology-Head+and+Neck+Surgery&rft.issn=1976-8710&rft.eissn=2005-0720&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=Suppl+1&rft.spage=S37&rft.epage=S42&rft_id=info:doi/10.3342%2Fceo.2012.5.S1.S37&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_58eab309dcdd4ff3a8ae8a1763365be7
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1976-8710&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1976-8710&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1976-8710&client=summon