Homology-Directed Repair in Zebrafish: Witchcraft and Wizardry?

Introducing desired mutations into the genome of model organisms is a priority for all research focusing on protein function and disease modeling. The need to create stable mutant lines has resulted in the rapid advancement of genetic techniques over the last few decades from chemical mutagenesis an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in molecular biosciences Vol. 7; p. 595474
Main Authors Prill, Kendal, Dawson, John F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 07.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introducing desired mutations into the genome of model organisms is a priority for all research focusing on protein function and disease modeling. The need to create stable mutant lines has resulted in the rapid advancement of genetic techniques over the last few decades from chemical mutagenesis and zinc finger nucleases to clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and homology-directed repair (HDR). However, achieving consistently high success rates for direct mutagenesis in zebrafish remains one of the most sought-after techniques in the field. Several genes have been modified using HDR in zebrafish, but published success rates range widely, suggesting that an optimal protocol is required. In this review, we compare target genes, techniques, and protocols from 50 genes that were successfully modified in zebrafish using HDR to find the statistically best variables for efficient HDR rates.
Bibliography:Edited by: Sanyuan Ma, Southwest University, China
Reviewed by: Veronika Butin-Israeli, Northwestern University, United States; Wenbiao Chen, Vanderbilt University, United States
This article was submitted to Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
ISSN:2296-889X
2296-889X
DOI:10.3389/fmolb.2020.595474