Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: Utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and radiocolloid in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Intra-cervical injection of technetium-99 sulfur colloid and lymphoscintigraphy were performed preoperatively....
Saved in:
Published in | Gynecologic oncology Vol. 111; no. 1; pp. 13 - 17 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.10.2008
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0090-8258 1095-6859 1095-6859 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and radiocolloid in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Intra-cervical injection of technetium-99 sulfur colloid and lymphoscintigraphy were performed preoperatively. Isosulfan blue was injected intra-cervically immediately prior to surgery. SLNs were excised and examined intraoperatively (imprint cytology and frozen section) and postoperatively (H and E histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin).
Thirty eight patients were evaluable. Laparoscopy and laparotomy were performed in 28.9% and 71.1%, respectively. Subjects had squamous cell carcinoma (
n
=
26), adenocarcinoma (
n
=
10) or adenosquamous (
n
=
2) histologies. 55.3% had cervical tumors <
2 cm. The overall SLN detection rate was 92.1%. The external iliac region just distal to the common iliac bifurcation was the most common SLN location. A mean of 2.1 SLNs were detected per patient with bilateral SLNs observed in 47.4%. On final pathology, metastatic nodal disease was identified in 15.7% of patients. Of these, 83.3% were detected in the SLNs. Sensitivity of SLN detection of metastasis was 100% for patients with cervical tumors <
2 cm. However intraoperative evaluation by imprint cytology and frozen section correctly identified lymph node metastasis in only 33.3%.
SLN detection is feasible and accurately reflects pelvic nodal basin status when performed in early-stage cervical cancer patients. However, while current intraoperative pathology techniques for assessing nodal metastases reliably detect metastases larger than 2 mm, they lack sufficient sensitivity to detect micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and radiocolloid in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Intra-cervical injection of technetium-99 sulfur colloid and lymphoscintigraphy were performed preoperatively. Isosulfan blue was injected intra-cervically immediately prior to surgery. SLNs were excised and examined intraoperatively (imprint cytology and frozen section) and postoperatively (H and E histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin).
Thirty eight patients were evaluable. Laparoscopy and laparotomy were performed in 28.9% and 71.1%, respectively. Subjects had squamous cell carcinoma (n=26), adenocarcinoma (n=10) or adenosquamous (n=2) histologies. 55.3% had cervical tumors <2 cm. The overall SLN detection rate was 92.1%. The external iliac region just distal to the common iliac bifurcation was the most common SLN location. A mean of 2.1 SLNs were detected per patient with bilateral SLNs observed in 47.4%. On final pathology, metastatic nodal disease was identified in 15.7% of patients. Of these, 83.3% were detected in the SLNs. Sensitivity of SLN detection of metastasis was 100% for patients with cervical tumors <2 cm. However intraoperative evaluation by imprint cytology and frozen section correctly identified lymph node metastasis in only 33.3%.
SLN detection is feasible and accurately reflects pelvic nodal basin status when performed in early-stage cervical cancer patients. However, while current intraoperative pathology techniques for assessing nodal metastases reliably detect metastases larger than 2 mm, they lack sufficient sensitivity to detect micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and radiocolloid in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Intra-cervical injection of technetium-99 sulfur colloid and lymphoscintigraphy were performed preoperatively. Isosulfan blue was injected intra-cervically immediately prior to surgery. SLNs were excised and examined intraoperatively (imprint cytology and frozen section) and postoperatively (H and E histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin). Thirty eight patients were evaluable. Laparoscopy and laparotomy were performed in 28.9% and 71.1%, respectively. Subjects had squamous cell carcinoma ( n = 26), adenocarcinoma ( n = 10) or adenosquamous ( n = 2) histologies. 55.3% had cervical tumors < 2 cm. The overall SLN detection rate was 92.1%. The external iliac region just distal to the common iliac bifurcation was the most common SLN location. A mean of 2.1 SLNs were detected per patient with bilateral SLNs observed in 47.4%. On final pathology, metastatic nodal disease was identified in 15.7% of patients. Of these, 83.3% were detected in the SLNs. Sensitivity of SLN detection of metastasis was 100% for patients with cervical tumors < 2 cm. However intraoperative evaluation by imprint cytology and frozen section correctly identified lymph node metastasis in only 33.3%. SLN detection is feasible and accurately reflects pelvic nodal basin status when performed in early-stage cervical cancer patients. However, while current intraoperative pathology techniques for assessing nodal metastases reliably detect metastases larger than 2 mm, they lack sufficient sensitivity to detect micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells. Abstract Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and radiocolloid in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods Intra-cervical injection of technetium-99 sulfur colloid and lymphoscintigraphy were performed preoperatively. Isosulfan blue was injected intra-cervically immediately prior to surgery. SLNs were excised and examined intraoperatively (imprint cytology and frozen section) and postoperatively (H and E histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin). Results Thirty eight patients were evaluable. Laparoscopy and laparotomy were performed in 28.9% and 71.1%, respectively. Subjects had squamous cell carcinoma ( n = 26), adenocarcinoma ( n = 10) or adenosquamous ( n = 2) histologies. 55.3% had cervical tumors < 2 cm. The overall SLN detection rate was 92.1%. The external iliac region just distal to the common iliac bifurcation was the most common SLN location. A mean of 2.1 SLNs were detected per patient with bilateral SLNs observed in 47.4%. On final pathology, metastatic nodal disease was identified in 15.7% of patients. Of these, 83.3% were detected in the SLNs. Sensitivity of SLN detection of metastasis was 100% for patients with cervical tumors < 2 cm. However intraoperative evaluation by imprint cytology and frozen section correctly identified lymph node metastasis in only 33.3%. Conclusions SLN detection is feasible and accurately reflects pelvic nodal basin status when performed in early-stage cervical cancer patients. However, while current intraoperative pathology techniques for assessing nodal metastases reliably detect metastases larger than 2 mm, they lack sufficient sensitivity to detect micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and radiocolloid in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.OBJECTIVETo determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and radiocolloid in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.Intra-cervical injection of technetium-99 sulfur colloid and lymphoscintigraphy were performed preoperatively. Isosulfan blue was injected intra-cervically immediately prior to surgery. SLNs were excised and examined intraoperatively (imprint cytology and frozen section) and postoperatively (H and E histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin).METHODSIntra-cervical injection of technetium-99 sulfur colloid and lymphoscintigraphy were performed preoperatively. Isosulfan blue was injected intra-cervically immediately prior to surgery. SLNs were excised and examined intraoperatively (imprint cytology and frozen section) and postoperatively (H and E histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin).Thirty eight patients were evaluable. Laparoscopy and laparotomy were performed in 28.9% and 71.1%, respectively. Subjects had squamous cell carcinoma (n=26), adenocarcinoma (n=10) or adenosquamous (n=2) histologies. 55.3% had cervical tumors <2 cm. The overall SLN detection rate was 92.1%. The external iliac region just distal to the common iliac bifurcation was the most common SLN location. A mean of 2.1 SLNs were detected per patient with bilateral SLNs observed in 47.4%. On final pathology, metastatic nodal disease was identified in 15.7% of patients. Of these, 83.3% were detected in the SLNs. Sensitivity of SLN detection of metastasis was 100% for patients with cervical tumors <2 cm. However intraoperative evaluation by imprint cytology and frozen section correctly identified lymph node metastasis in only 33.3%.RESULTSThirty eight patients were evaluable. Laparoscopy and laparotomy were performed in 28.9% and 71.1%, respectively. Subjects had squamous cell carcinoma (n=26), adenocarcinoma (n=10) or adenosquamous (n=2) histologies. 55.3% had cervical tumors <2 cm. The overall SLN detection rate was 92.1%. The external iliac region just distal to the common iliac bifurcation was the most common SLN location. A mean of 2.1 SLNs were detected per patient with bilateral SLNs observed in 47.4%. On final pathology, metastatic nodal disease was identified in 15.7% of patients. Of these, 83.3% were detected in the SLNs. Sensitivity of SLN detection of metastasis was 100% for patients with cervical tumors <2 cm. However intraoperative evaluation by imprint cytology and frozen section correctly identified lymph node metastasis in only 33.3%.SLN detection is feasible and accurately reflects pelvic nodal basin status when performed in early-stage cervical cancer patients. However, while current intraoperative pathology techniques for assessing nodal metastases reliably detect metastases larger than 2 mm, they lack sufficient sensitivity to detect micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells.CONCLUSIONSSLN detection is feasible and accurately reflects pelvic nodal basin status when performed in early-stage cervical cancer patients. However, while current intraoperative pathology techniques for assessing nodal metastases reliably detect metastases larger than 2 mm, they lack sufficient sensitivity to detect micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells. |
Author | Rohan, L. Cencia Schwartz, B. Comerci, J. Edwards, R.P. Cost, M. Sukumvanich, P. Elishaev, E. Kanbour-Shakir, A. Fader, A. Nickles Kelley, J.L. Sumkin, J. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: A. Nickles surname: Fader fullname: Fader, A. Nickles organization: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: R.P. surname: Edwards fullname: Edwards, R.P. organization: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: M. surname: Cost fullname: Cost, M. organization: Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: A. surname: Kanbour-Shakir fullname: Kanbour-Shakir, A. organization: School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: J.L. surname: Kelley fullname: Kelley, J.L. organization: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA – sequence: 6 givenname: B. surname: Schwartz fullname: Schwartz, B. organization: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA – sequence: 7 givenname: P. surname: Sukumvanich fullname: Sukumvanich, P. organization: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA – sequence: 8 givenname: J. surname: Comerci fullname: Comerci, J. organization: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA – sequence: 9 givenname: J. surname: Sumkin fullname: Sumkin, J. organization: School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA – sequence: 10 givenname: E. surname: Elishaev fullname: Elishaev, E. organization: School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, USA – sequence: 11 givenname: L. Cencia surname: Rohan fullname: Rohan, L. Cencia email: rsilcr@mwri.magee.edu organization: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18684499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFUl1rFTEQDVKxt9VfIEiefNs12Y9soihI8QsKPtSCbyHJna255iZrkr2w_96styoUtE8zDOecYc6ZM3TigweEnlJSU0LZi1293Cw-1A0hvCasJkQ8QBtKRF8x3osTtCkTUvGm56foLKUdIaQltHmETilnvOuE2KB8BT5bDw67ZT99wz5sAWsbprRg6zGo6JYqZXUD2EA8WKMcNsqX_iW-ztbZvOAwFmiOKkwQVbYHwAeIaU54Cin_HaqUIKV92fcYPRyVS_Dktp6j6_fvvlx8rC4_f_h08fayMh3rctX040C57rkm0PQD06PuqVFCDLrTrBcdB6DDOKiGDx1QyqiGdmBcdKCNGcb2HD0_6k4x_JghZbm3yYBzykOYk2SCFR-GtgCf3QJnvYetnKLdq7jI3z4VgDgCTAwpRRilsbmcFda7rZOUyDUTuZO_MpFrJpIwWRIo3PYO94_8f1mvjywoBh0sRJmMhWL81kYwWW6DvYf_5g7fOOvX_L7DAmkX5uiL95LK1Egir9ZfWV-FcEK6dvhaBF79W-De9T8BUcjTCg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_IGC_0000000000000513 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2018_08_004 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_24956 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2010_06_027 crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_24022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2023_08_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2013_12_095 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_187684 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2407_10_465 crossref_primary_10_1097_IGC_0000000000000031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2016_08_236 crossref_primary_10_1097_GCO_0b013e32834156fb crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_13788 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2014_09_010 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2407_11_157 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1634_7080_13_64174_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_05_043 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gyobfe_2010_09_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_05_037 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1624_5857_12_57321_7 crossref_primary_10_1097_IGC_0000000000001310 crossref_primary_10_1186_1477_7819_7_11 crossref_primary_10_1586_era_10_181 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_remn_2009_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_8394049 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2009_12_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2019_01_184 crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2019_001113 crossref_primary_10_1186_1756_9966_29_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12032_014_0385_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2011_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_722 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_018_1341_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2009_11_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1636_5577_13_66015_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gmit_2012_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2011_08_010 crossref_primary_10_1634_theoncologist_2009_0075 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_014_2732_8 crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2019_0249_RA crossref_primary_10_1016_S1470_2045_09_70191_3 crossref_primary_10_1097_IGC_0000000000000539 crossref_primary_10_1097_IGC_0000000000000738 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_01_023 crossref_primary_10_1586_era_10_61 crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_AMR_1084_540 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_081X_13_63555_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0b013e32832f3d53 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000027035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2020_08_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1578_200X_09_70022_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2012_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biomaterials_2021_121070 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2017_02_017 crossref_primary_10_1586_14737140_2013_811147 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogc_2012_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2021_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2010_12_345 crossref_primary_10_1111_IGC_0b013e3181f7f52b crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2012_03_041 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12253_020_00822_2 crossref_primary_10_1097_IGC_0b013e318263f06a crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gyobfe_2011_07_034 crossref_primary_10_3109_02656736_2012_675116 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_020_02762_6 |
Cites_doi | 10.1056/NEJM199810013391401 10.1006/gyno.2000.6041 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.04.016 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00402.x 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90070-X 10.1200/JCO.20.3.688 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.976 10.1002/cncr.23368 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7076 10.1016/S0090-8258(89)80024-1 10.1245/s10434-007-9424-6 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00519.x 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90054-9 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.022 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.10.034 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.018 10.1093/jnci/djj158 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00115.x 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.02.008 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.031 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.015 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2008 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2008 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Elsevier Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1095-6859 |
EndPage | 17 |
ExternalDocumentID | 18684499 10_1016_j_ygyno_2008_06_009 S009082580800437X 1_s2_0_S009082580800437X |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29I 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADFGL ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF CS3 DM4 DU5 EBS EFBJH EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HED HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE J1W K-O KOM L7B LG5 M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OQ. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PH~ Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UDS UHS UV1 WUQ X7M XPP Z5R ZGI ZMT ZU3 ZXP ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-25f718b58b0e2576bfb51ca997b4b65948ee17f7a2874e1161be376894ebcc7f3 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 04:42:05 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:07:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:11 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:14:05 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:18:48 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:20:06 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:33:33 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Sentinel lymph node Sentinel lymph node detection in cervical cancer Cervical cancer |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c464t-25f718b58b0e2576bfb51ca997b4b65948ee17f7a2874e1161be376894ebcc7f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 18684499 |
PQID | 69668473 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_69668473 pubmed_primary_18684499 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ygyno_2008_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2008_06_009 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2008_06_009 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S009082580800437X elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2008_06_009 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2008-10-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2008-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2008 text: 2008-10-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Gynecologic oncology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gynecol Oncol |
PublicationYear | 2008 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Kushner, Connor, Wilson (bib15) 2007 Sep; 106 Wydra, Sawicki (bib13) 2006; 16 Gershenwald, Thompson, Mansfield (bib6) 1999 Mar; 17 Malur, Krause, Kohler, Schneider (bib8) 2001; 80 Krag, Weaver, Ashikaga (bib4) 1998 Oct; 339 Bleiweiss, Nagi, Jaffer (bib22) 2006; 24 Levenback, Coleman, Burke, Erdman, Deavers, Delpassand (bib9) 2002; 20 Hauspy, Beiner, Harley (bib14) 2007; 105 Roy M, Plante M, et al: Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancers. 2006 Delgado, Bundy, Fowler (bib2) 1989; 35 Alvarez, Potter, Soong (bib3) 1991; 43 Frumovitz, Coleman, Gayed (bib12) 2006; 194 Angioli, Palaia, Cipriani, Muzii, Calcagno, Gullotta, Panici (bib10) 2005; 96 Barranger, Cortez, Uzan (bib17) 2004; 94 De Mascarel I, Macgrogan G, Debled M, Brouste V, Mauriac L, Distinction between isolated tumor cells and micrometastasis in breast cancer: is it reliable and useful? Cancer. 2008 Feb 19 Coutant, Morel, Delpech, Uzan, Darai, Barranger (bib16) 2007 Aug; 14 Frumovitz, Ramirez, Tortolero-Luna (bib7) 2004 Jan; 92 Fregnani, Latorre, Novik, Lopes, Soares (bib21) 2006 May–Jun; 16 Brommeland, Lindal, Straume, Dahl, Hennig (bib19) 2003 Sept; 108 Mansel, Fallowfield, Kissin (bib5) 2006 May 3; 98 Rob, Strnad, Robova (bib11) 2005; 98 Lee, Wang, Lin (bib1) 1989 Feb; 32 Kushner (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib15) 2007; 106 Bleiweiss (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib22) 2006; 24 Angioli (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib10) 2005; 96 Alvarez (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib3) 1991; 43 Levenback (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib9) 2002; 20 Fregnani (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib21) 2006; 16 Coutant (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib16) 2007; 14 Mansel (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib5) 2006; 98 Gershenwald (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib6) 1999; 17 Wydra (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib13) 2006; 16 Lee (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib1) 1989; 32 Krag (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib4) 1998; 339 Brommeland (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib19) 2003; 108 Rob (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib11) 2005; 98 Delgado (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib2) 1989; 35 Barranger (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib17) 2004; 94 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib20 Malur (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib8) 2001; 80 Frumovitz (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib7) 2004; 92 Frumovitz (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib12) 2006; 194 Hauspy (10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib14) 2007; 105 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib18 |
References_xml | – volume: 92 start-page: 205 year: 2004 Jan end-page: 210 ident: bib7 article-title: Characteristics of recurrence in patients who underwent lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. – volume: 16 start-page: 649 year: 2006 end-page: 654 ident: bib13 article-title: Sentinel node identification in cervical cancer patients undergoing transperitoneal radical hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases. publication-title: Int. J. Gyne. Can. – volume: 16 start-page: 1188 year: 2006 May–Jun end-page: 94l ident: bib21 article-title: Assessment of pelvic lymph node micrometastatic disease in stages IB and IIA of carcinoma of the uterine cervix publication-title: In. J. Gynecol Cancer – volume: 24 start-page: 1978 year: 2006 end-page: 1979 ident: bib22 article-title: Axillary sentinel lymph nodes can be falsely positive due to iatrogenic displacement and transport of benign epithelial cells in patients with breast carcinoma. publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol. – reference: De Mascarel I, Macgrogan G, Debled M, Brouste V, Mauriac L, Distinction between isolated tumor cells and micrometastasis in breast cancer: is it reliable and useful? Cancer. 2008 Feb 19; – volume: 96 start-page: 504 year: 2005 end-page: 509 ident: bib10 article-title: Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in cervical cancer: a critical point of view publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. – volume: 194 start-page: 1186 year: 2006 end-page: 1195 ident: bib12 article-title: Usefulness of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer publication-title: Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol – volume: 32 start-page: 135 year: 1989 Feb end-page: 142 ident: bib1 article-title: Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for treatment of cervical cancer: a clinical review of 954 cases publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol – volume: 20 start-page: 688 year: 2002 end-page: 693 ident: bib9 article-title: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in patients with cervix cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol – volume: 35 start-page: 314 year: 1989 ident: bib2 article-title: A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a GOG study publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol – volume: 339 start-page: 941 year: 1998 Oct end-page: 946 ident: bib4 article-title: The sentinel node in breast cancer—a multi-center validation study publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med – volume: 43 start-page: 181 year: 1991 ident: bib3 article-title: Rationale for using pathologic tumor dimensions and nodal status to subclassify surgically treated Stage IB cervical cancer patients publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol – volume: 14 start-page: 2392 year: 2007 Aug end-page: 2399 ident: bib16 article-title: Laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer using a combined detection: 5-years experience publication-title: Ann. Surg. Oncol – reference: Roy M, Plante M, et al: Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancers. 2006; – volume: 108 start-page: 153 year: 2003 Sept end-page: 156 ident: bib19 article-title: Does imprint cytology of brain tumors improve intraoperative diagnosis? publication-title: Acta. Neurologica Scandinavica. – volume: 98 start-page: 599 year: 2006 May 3 end-page: 609 ident: bib5 article-title: Randomized multi-center trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial publication-title: J Natl. Cancer Inst – volume: 17 start-page: 976 year: 1999 Mar end-page: 983 ident: bib6 article-title: Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol – volume: 80 start-page: 254 year: 2001 end-page: 257 ident: bib8 article-title: Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with cervical cancer. publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol – volume: 98 start-page: 281 year: 2005 end-page: 288 ident: bib11 article-title: Study of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer. publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol – volume: 94 start-page: 175 year: 2004 end-page: 180 ident: bib17 article-title: Value of intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel nodes in patients with cervical cancer publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. – volume: 105 start-page: 285 year: 2007 end-page: 290 ident: bib14 article-title: Sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. – volume: 106 start-page: 507 year: 2007 Sep end-page: 512 ident: bib15 article-title: Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping for cervix cancer—a detailed evaluation and time analysis publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol – ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib18 – volume: 339 start-page: 941 issue: 14 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib4 article-title: The sentinel node in breast cancer—a multi-center validation study publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810013391401 – volume: 80 start-page: 254 issue: 2 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib8 article-title: Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with cervical cancer. publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6041 – volume: 98 start-page: 281 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib11 article-title: Study of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer. publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.04.016 – volume: 16 start-page: 649 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib13 article-title: Sentinel node identification in cervical cancer patients undergoing transperitoneal radical hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases. publication-title: Int. J. Gyne. Can. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00402.x – volume: 35 start-page: 314 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib2 article-title: A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a GOG study publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90070-X – volume: 20 start-page: 688 issue: 3 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib9 article-title: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in patients with cervix cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.3.688 – volume: 17 start-page: 976 issue: 3 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib6 article-title: Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.976 – ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib20 doi: 10.1002/cncr.23368 – volume: 24 start-page: 1978 issue: 13 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib22 article-title: Axillary sentinel lymph nodes can be falsely positive due to iatrogenic displacement and transport of benign epithelial cells in patients with breast carcinoma. publication-title: J. Clin. Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7076 – volume: 32 start-page: 135 issue: 2 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib1 article-title: Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for treatment of cervical cancer: a clinical review of 954 cases publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol doi: 10.1016/S0090-8258(89)80024-1 – volume: 14 start-page: 2392 issue: 8 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib16 article-title: Laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer using a combined detection: 5-years experience publication-title: Ann. Surg. Oncol doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9424-6 – volume: 16 start-page: 1188 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib21 article-title: Assessment of pelvic lymph node micrometastatic disease in stages IB and IIA of carcinoma of the uterine cervix publication-title: In. J. Gynecol Cancer doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00519.x – volume: 43 start-page: 181 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib3 article-title: Rationale for using pathologic tumor dimensions and nodal status to subclassify surgically treated Stage IB cervical cancer patients publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90054-9 – volume: 92 start-page: 205 issue: 1 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib7 article-title: Characteristics of recurrence in patients who underwent lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.022 – volume: 96 start-page: 504 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib10 article-title: Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in cervical cancer: a critical point of view publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.10.034 – volume: 194 start-page: 1186 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib12 article-title: Usefulness of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer publication-title: Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.018 – volume: 98 start-page: 599 issue: 9 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib5 article-title: Randomized multi-center trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial publication-title: J Natl. Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj158 – volume: 108 start-page: 153 issue: 3 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib19 article-title: Does imprint cytology of brain tumors improve intraoperative diagnosis? publication-title: Acta. Neurologica Scandinavica. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00115.x – volume: 105 start-page: 285 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib14 article-title: Sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.02.008 – volume: 106 start-page: 507 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib15 article-title: Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping for cervix cancer—a detailed evaluation and time analysis publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.031 – volume: 94 start-page: 175 issue: 1 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009_bib17 article-title: Value of intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel nodes in patients with cervical cancer publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.015 |
SSID | ssj0003012 |
Score | 2.2164407 |
Snippet | To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and radiocolloid in patients... Abstract Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye, and... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 13 |
SubjectTerms | Cervical cancer Female Frozen Sections Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Immunohistochemistry Intraoperative Care - methods Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging Lymph Nodes - pathology Neoplasm Staging Obstetrics and Gynecology Postoperative Care - methods Radionuclide Imaging Rosaniline Dyes Sentinel lymph node Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods Sentinel lymph node detection in cervical cancer Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery |
Title | Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: Utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S009082580800437X https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S009082580800437X https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18684499 https://www.proquest.com/docview/69668473 |
Volume | 111 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELb6kBAXxJvlUXzgSGgS23lwqyqqhRU9ACv2ZtneSbXVKok22UMu_HZmEicIQYvEKUrisRN7PDOWP3_D2BsBhXQCVBC62ARSJOsgF6EJhIvXYESR4Q2hLS6T-VJ-WqnVATsfz8IQrNLb_sGm99baPzn1vXlabzZ0xpfSdSsiRiSCntUhO45FnqBqH599XMwvJ4OMOjyQhvenplU2kg_1MK_uqisrj6mkfYn8Jgd1UwDaO6KL--yejyD52fCRD9gBlA_Znc9-j_wRa78SAKiELd92OFS8rNbA7aaqm45vSg7EaBxgTHgF3PWGAitzNPa793zZElS241WBRdudqWoYmME5oTf2Da-Jh2N6aCZaz8dsefHh2_k88LkVAicT2QaxKtArWZXZEGjNYQurImfyPLXSJsThAhClRWqIDx8ijAstoC3KcgnWubQQT9hRWZXwjHG1tkQxY3MlU6mwIpOCw8ApLAwGA2E-Y_HYodp54nHKf7HVI8LsWvej4FNiEs4Ohd5OQvXAu3F7cTmOlB6PlKIR1OgXbhdL_yYGjZ_IjY50E-tQ_6FsM5ZMkr_p67-bfD0qksaZTNszpoRq3-gEV54YK4gZezro168fz_AFLk2f_2-jL9jdeOTxjV6yo3a3h1cYTLX2hB2--xGd-ClD18WX74ufT2sijg |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwELYoSG0vCPqApS340GNT8rDz4FYh0EKBS1lpb5btnaBFqyTaZA-59LczkziLqhYqcYzjsRN7ZjyWv_nM2NcIcmEjkJ5vQ-2JKJ55WeRrL7LhDHSUp_hAaIubeDwRl1M53WCnQy4MwSqd7-99euetXcmxG83jaj6nHF-6rlsSMSIR9ExfsS2B5kvW-f33I84DNbinDO9ypmU6UA91IK_2ri1Kh6ikU4nsqeXpqfCzW4bOd9i2ix_5j_4Td9kGFO_Y62t3Qv6eNb8I_lPAgi9anChelDPgZl5WdcvnBQfiM_YwIrwDbjs3gY1ZmvnlCZ80BJRteZlj1Wapywp6XnBO2I1VzSti4VgX6jWp5wc2OT-7PR177mYFz4pYNF4oc1yTjEyND7TjMLmRgdVZlhhhYmJwAQiSPNHEhg8BRoUG0BOlmQBjbZJHH9lmURawz7icGSKYMZkUiZDYkE7AYtjk5xpDAT8bsXAYUGUd7TjdfrFQA77sXnWz4C7EJJQdCn1bC1U968bz1cUwU2pIKEUXqHBVeF4s-ZcY1M6MaxWoOlS--kvVRixeS_6hrf_v8mhQJIV2TIczuoByVasY950YKUQjttfr1-OPp_gCN6YHL-30iL0Z315fqauLm5-f2NtwYPQNPrPNZrmCLxhWNeawM5sHpvMhrw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentinel+lymph+node+biopsy+in+early-stage+cervical+cancer%3A+Utility+of+intraoperative+versus+postoperative+assessment&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic+oncology&rft.au=Fader%2C+A.+Nickles&rft.au=Edwards%2C+R.P.&rft.au=Cost%2C+M.&rft.au=Kanbour-Shakir%2C+A.&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=17&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ygyno.2008.06.009&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_ygyno_2008_06_009 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00908258%2FS0090825808X00162%2Fcov150h.gif |