Capecitabine and lapatinib for the first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors inv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 122; no. 15; pp. 2350 - 2355
Main Authors Weiss, Jared M., Bagley, Stephen, Hwang, Wei‐Ting, Bauml, Joshua, Olson, Juneko Grilley, Cohen, Roger B., Hayes, David Neil, Langer, Corey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.08.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first‐line treatment with an all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. METHODS Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21‐day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7‐12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%‐38%). The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6‐5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5‐FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all‐oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350–2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society. In the current study, patients receiving first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 10.7 months.
AbstractList In the current study, patients receiving first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 10.7 months.
The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first-line treatment with an all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib.BACKGROUNDThe combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first-line treatment with an all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib.Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival.METHODSPatients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival.A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7-12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%-38%). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6-5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry.RESULTSA total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7-12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%-38%). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6-5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry.The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all-oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350-2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society.CONCLUSIONSThe current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all-oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350-2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first-line treatment with an all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival. A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7-12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%-38%). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6-5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all-oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350-2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first-line treatment with an all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. METHODS Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m super(2) twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7-12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%-38%). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6-5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all-oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016; 122:2350-2355. copyright 2016 American Cancer Society. In the current study, patients receiving first-line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 10.7 months.
BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first‐line treatment with an all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. METHODS Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21‐day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7‐12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%‐38%). The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6‐5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5‐FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all‐oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350–2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society. In the current study, patients receiving first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 10.7 months.
Author Olson, Juneko Grilley
Bagley, Stephen
Langer, Corey
Weiss, Jared M.
Hayes, David Neil
Bauml, Joshua
Cohen, Roger B.
Hwang, Wei‐Ting
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jared M.
  surname: Weiss
  fullname: Weiss, Jared M.
  organization: University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Stephen
  surname: Bagley
  fullname: Bagley, Stephen
  organization: University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Wei‐Ting
  surname: Hwang
  fullname: Hwang, Wei‐Ting
  organization: University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Joshua
  surname: Bauml
  fullname: Bauml, Joshua
  organization: University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Juneko Grilley
  surname: Olson
  fullname: Olson, Juneko Grilley
  organization: University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Roger B.
  surname: Cohen
  fullname: Cohen, Roger B.
  organization: University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center
– sequence: 7
  givenname: David Neil
  surname: Hayes
  fullname: Hayes, David Neil
  organization: University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Corey
  surname: Langer
  fullname: Langer, Corey
  organization: University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkc1q3TAQhUVJaG7SbvoARctScDKS9eO7LCb9gdBASKE7IUtjotaWbySZkF0foc_YJ6mdm2xKKV0NM3znMJxzTA7iFJGQVwxOGQA_c9Gl0xpA6Wdkw2CrK2CCH5ANADSVFPXXI3Kc87dl1VzWz8kR12yrQaoNuWvtDl0otgsRqY2eDnZnS4iho_2UaLlB2oeUy68fP4cVKQltGTEWOvV0xGJzWXB3ltDNKa33G7T-wSmi-07z7WzHac7U4TBQZ5MLcRrtC3LY2yHjy8d5Qr68P79uP1YXlx8-te8uKieU0JX0DTila-U70fXOo-gaWzPJODZcI3PKOuag1sAb8J4JhQK5FYheSuma-oS82fvu0nQ7Yy5mDHl9xUZcvjKsYWwLwBT7DxSUELXkakFfP6JzN6I3uxRGm-7NU64LAHvApSnnhL1ZMy5hiiXZMBgGZq3OrNWZh-oWyds_JE-uf4XZHr4LA97_gzTt5_Zqr_kNkmCrlQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2022_13297
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctrv_2024_102864
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_019_6308_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2022_101426
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_09722_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13143545
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_adaj_2017_08_046
crossref_primary_10_1080_13543784_2019_1581172
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_31526
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11195582
crossref_primary_10_1002_adsc_201601434
crossref_primary_10_3892_ijo_2016_3821
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13215471
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rvsc_2024_105363
crossref_primary_10_3892_wasj_2022_170
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2018_1493925
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijc_IJC_746_18
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers11101552
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0042_1756663
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00242-2
10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.110
10.1056/NEJMoa0802656
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1432
10.2147/OTT.S68235
10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2891
10.1038/sj.bjc.6605697
10.1056/NEJMoa064320
10.1007/s10549-007-9885-0
10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70124-5
10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1245
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7812
10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00603.x
10.1177/1078155213510542
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2825
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 American Cancer Society
2016 American Cancer Society.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 American Cancer Society
– notice: 2016 American Cancer Society.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7TO
H94
DOI 10.1002/cncr.30067
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-0142
EndPage 2355
ExternalDocumentID 27197056
10_1002_cncr_30067
CNCR30067
Genre article
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: K12 CA120780
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 CA016520
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.3N
.GA
05W
0R~
10A
1CY
1L6
1OC
24P
29B
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5VS
66C
6J9
6P2
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
85S
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAONW
AAQOH
AARRQ
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABHFT
ABIJN
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FD6
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
GX1
H.X
HBH
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HZ~
IH2
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
KZ1
L7B
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LH4
LITHE
LMP
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LSO
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
ROL
RWI
RX1
RYL
SJN
SUPJJ
TEORI
UDS
UHB
V2E
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XPP
XV2
Z0Y
ZGI
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
.GJ
.Y3
31~
3O-
AAYXX
ACCFJ
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEYWJ
AFFNX
AGHNM
AGNAY
AGYGG
AI.
AIWBW
AJBDE
C1A
CITATION
HF~
H~9
J5H
N4W
NEJ
OHT
RSU
VH1
WHG
Y6R
YQJ
ZXP
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7TO
H94
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4647-5d80c6736db4bfcde4b8a31512e827e1c6ac1c0370280dd146e4e2a4eed555c83
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0008-543X
1097-0142
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 00:40:15 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 00:11:54 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:49:12 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:44 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:09:18 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 17:04:50 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 15
Keywords head and neck neoplasms
toxicity
lapatinib
capecitabine
survival
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2016 American Cancer Society.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4647-5d80c6736db4bfcde4b8a31512e827e1c6ac1c0370280dd146e4e2a4eed555c83
Notes We thank the patients and families who participated in this study as well as the study nurses and coordinators.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/cncr.30067
PMID 27197056
PQID 1806443526
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1811900161
proquest_miscellaneous_1806443526
pubmed_primary_27197056
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_cncr_30067
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_30067
wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_30067_CNCR30067
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 1, 2016
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2016
  text: August 1, 2016
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Cancer
PublicationTitleAlternate Cancer
PublicationYear 2016
References 2015; 16
2002; 184
1997; 15
2010; 102
2015; 21
2008; 37
2008; 359
2012; 18
2008; 112
1992; 10
2012; 13
2015; 8
2007; 25
2014; 32
2014; 20
2006; 355
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
Harrington KJ (e_1_2_8_15_1) 2014; 32
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
References_xml – volume: 102
  start-page: 1687
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1691
  article-title: Phase II study of capecitabine as palliative treatment for patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous head and neck cancer after previous platinum‐based treatment
  publication-title: Br J Cancer.
– volume: 32
  start-page: Page
  issue: 5 suppl
  year: 2014
  article-title: Final analysis: a randomized, blinded, placebo (P)‐controlled phase III study of adjuvant postoperative lapatinib (L) with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CH‐RT) in high‐risk patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) [abstract]
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 2336
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2343
  article-title: A phase II study of lapatinib in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 526
  year: 2015
  end-page: 533
  article-title: HER2 as a therapeutic target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1245
  year: 1992
  end-page: 1251
  article-title: Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
– volume: 359
  start-page: 1116
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1127
  article-title: Platinum‐based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med.
– volume: 20
  start-page: 409
  year: 2014
  end-page: 416
  article-title: Incidence of cetuximab‐related infusion reactions in oncology patients treated at the University of North Carolina Cancer Hospital
  publication-title: J Oncol Pharm Pract.
– volume: 37
  start-page: 145
  year: 2008
  end-page: 150
  article-title: Comparative analysis of c‐erbB‐2 (HER‐2/neu) in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: does over‐expression exist? And what is its correlation with traditional diagnostic parameters?
  publication-title: J Oral Pathol Med.
– volume: 355
  start-page: 2733
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2743
  article-title: Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2‐positive advanced breast cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med.
– volume: 15
  start-page: 110
  year: 1997
  end-page: 115
  article-title: Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 2891
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2896
  article-title: HER2/neu expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients is not significantly elevated
  publication-title: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev.
– volume: 8
  start-page: 335
  year: 2015
  end-page: 345
  article-title: Cytotoxic effect of lapatinib is restricted to human papillomavirus‐positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines
  publication-title: Onco Targets Ther.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 3644
  year: 2007
  end-page: 3648
  article-title: High incidence of cetuximab‐related infusion reactions in Tennessee and North Carolina and the association with atopic history
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
– volume: 184
  start-page: 223
  year: 2002
  end-page: 230
  article-title: The expression of p53, c‐erbB‐1 and c‐erbB‐2 molecules and their correlation with prognostic markers in patients with head and neck tumors
  publication-title: Cancer Lett.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 583
  year: 2015
  end-page: 594
  article-title: Afatinib versus methotrexate as second‐line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum‐based therapy (LUX‐Head & Neck 1): an open‐label, randomised phase 3 trial
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
– volume: 112
  start-page: 533
  year: 2008
  end-page: 543
  article-title: A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat.
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00242-2
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.110
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802656
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1432
– volume: 32
  start-page: Page
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  article-title: Final analysis: a randomized, blinded, placebo (P)‐controlled phase III study of adjuvant postoperative lapatinib (L) with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CH‐RT) in high‐risk patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) [abstract]
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.2147/OTT.S68235
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2891
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605697
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064320
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9885-0
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70124-5
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1245
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7812
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00603.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1177/1078155213510542
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2825
SSID ssj0007253
Score 2.3094702
Snippet BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer,...
In the current study, patients receiving first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all‐oral regimen...
The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high...
BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer,...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 2350
SubjectTerms Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
capecitabine
Capecitabine - administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Female
head and neck neoplasms
Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy
Head and Neck Neoplasms - mortality
Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology
Humans
Lapatinib
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Quinazolines - administration & dosage
Retreatment
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
survival
toxicity
Treatment Outcome
Title Capecitabine and lapatinib for the first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fcncr.30067
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197056
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1806443526
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1811900161
Volume 122
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fS9xAEB_EB-lL1dbWq1q21JcWciabzW0OfJGjIgV9kAr3UsLu7AYOdc9qDsEnP4Kf0U_iTJLLYVuE9i2BSfbvzPx2d_Y3ALu5yuJUYRKV5N0jRW-R1TKPstL4zKSxdJ4vOB-fDI7O1PdxNl6C_fldmIYfottwY82o7TUruLE3ewvSUAx43U_Z2pIB5mAtRkSnC-4oLVsKyphKVum44yaVe4tPn3ujPyDmc8Rau5zDVfg5r2wTaXLen1W2j3e_8Tj-b2vW4HWLRcVBM3nWYcmHN7By3J62v4XbkeHs9JWh1bMXJjhxYTgAO0ysIKwrCDuKckLw8fH-gWsguqh1MS3Fpa8MX1eaIO8ENTRQgky_q_8UPJ6Lm18zw1sPgo8PBHJaozC9NBtwdvjtx-goahM1RKgGSkeZy2PkADFnlS3ReWVzkzKW8LnUPsGBwQTjVPM5rnNknL3y0ijyz1mWYZ6-g-UwDX4TBA6VkspZU5KMMmQChwShnPZDJEFte_BlPmAFtizmnEzjomj4l2XBPVnUPdmDz53sVcPd8VepT_NxL0i1uMEmeGp7keSE1xQnEHhJJiFIxbi5B--bSdOVJXUy1AQwe_C1HvoXKlGMTkan9dOHfxHeglcE4AZNQOI2LFfXM79DIKmyH2tleALGkQ9Z
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB5BkYAL78LyNIILSNkmjrPOHtGKaoHuHqpW2ltkjx1p1dYLbVZInPgJ_EZ-CTNOmlUBVYJbIk3i54w_j8ffALwuVZHmCrOkptU9UfSWWC3LpKiNL0yeSuf5gvNsPpoeqo-LYtHF5vBdmJYfone4sWZEe80Kzg7pnQ1rKAY8HeZsbq_CNU7pHXdU-xv2KC07EsqUylb5omcnlTubby-uR3-AzIuYNS46u7fbzKpnkauQY02OhuvGDvHbb0yO_92eO3Crg6PiXTt_7sIVH-7B9Vl34H4fvk4MJ6hvDG2gvTDBiWPDMdhhaQXBXUHwUdRLQpA_v__gKog-cF2sanHiG8M3lpbIzqCWCUqQ9XfxT8HjkTj7sjbsfRB8giCQMxuF1Yl5AIe77w8m06TL1ZCgGimdFK5MkWPEnFW2RueVLU3OcMKXUvsMRwYzTHPNR7nOkX32ykujaIkuigLLfBu2wir4RyBwrJRUzpqaZJQhKzgmFOW0HyMJajuAN-cjVmFHZM75NI6rloJZVtyTVezJAbzqZT-39B1_lXp5PvAVaRc32ARPba-ykiCb4hwCl8lkhKoYOg_gYTtr-rKkzsaaMOYA3saxv6QS1WQ-2Y9Pj_9F-AXcmB7M9qq9D_NPT-Am4blRG5_4FLaa07V_Rpipsc-jZvwCoTUTdA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEB9qheKL39bzc0VfFHJNNptsDnyRq0f96CHFwr1I2J3dwNF2r9Ycgk_-Cf6N_iXOJLkcVSnoWwKT7OfM_HZ39jcAzwqVxanCJKrIu0eK3iKrZRFllfGZSWPpPF9w3p_me4fq7SybbcDL1V2Ylh-i33BjzWjsNSv4qat21qShGPBsmLK1vQSXVR4XPKd3D9bkUVp2HJQxFa3SWU9OKnfW3553R39gzPOQtfE5k2vwaVXbNtTkaLis7RC__Ubk-L_NuQ5XOzAqXrWz5wZs-HATtva74_Zb8HVsOD19bWj57IUJThwbjsAOcysI7AoCj6KaE378-f0H10D0YetiUYkTXxu-rzRH3gpqeaAE2X7X_Cl4PBJfPi8N7z0IPj8QyHmNwuLE3IbDyeuP472oy9QQocqVjjJXxMgRYs4qW6HzyhYmZTDhC6l9grnBBONU80Guc2SdvfLSKHLQWZZhkd6BzbAI_i4IHCkllbOmIhllyAaOCEM57UdIgtoO4PlqwErsaMw5m8Zx2RIwy5J7smx6cgBPe9nTlrzjr1JPVuNekm5xg03w1PYyKQiwKc4gcJFMQpiKgfMAtttJ05cldTLShDAH8KIZ-gsqUY6n44Pm6d6_CD-GrQ-7k_L9m-m7-3CFwFzeBic-gM36bOkfEmCq7aNGL34BfvkSLA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capecitabine+and+lapatinib+for+the+first-line+treatment+of+metastatic%2Frecurrent+head+and+neck+squamous+cell+carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Weiss%2C+Jared+M&rft.au=Bagley%2C+Stephen&rft.au=Hwang%2C+Wei-Ting&rft.au=Bauml%2C+Joshua&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=2350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fcncr.30067&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27197056&rft.externalDocID=27197056
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0008-543X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0008-543X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0008-543X&client=summon