Capecitabine and lapatinib for the first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors inv...
Saved in:
Published in | Cancer Vol. 122; no. 15; pp. 2350 - 2355 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.08.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | BACKGROUND
The combination of cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first‐line treatment with an all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib.
METHODS
Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21‐day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival.
RESULTS
A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7‐12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%‐38%). The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6‐5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry.
CONCLUSIONS
The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5‐FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all‐oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350–2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
In the current study, patients receiving first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 10.7 months. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In the current study, patients receiving first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 10.7 months. The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first-line treatment with an all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib.BACKGROUNDThe combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first-line treatment with an all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib.Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival.METHODSPatients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival.A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7-12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%-38%). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6-5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry.RESULTSA total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7-12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%-38%). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6-5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry.The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all-oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350-2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society.CONCLUSIONSThe current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all-oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350-2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society. The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first-line treatment with an all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival. A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7-12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%-38%). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6-5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all-oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350-2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society. BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first-line treatment with an all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. METHODS Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m super(2) twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7-12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%-38%). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6-5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all-oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016; 122:2350-2355. copyright 2016 American Cancer Society. In the current study, patients receiving first-line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all-oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 10.7 months. BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high rate of toxicity. Identifying less toxic, equally effective regimens is imperative. Therefore, in the current study, the authors investigated first‐line treatment with an all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. METHODS Patients were required to have incurable head and neck cancer of any primary site other than the nasopharynx, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and no prior exposure to capecitabine or lapatinib. Subjects were treated with capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 twice daily and lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily. Capecitabine was administered for 14 days of each 21‐day cycle for 4 cycles. Lapatinib was administered daily until disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 44 subjects were accrued between November 13, 2009 and April 29, 2014. Approximately 38.6% of the sample had an ECOG PS of 0, 52.3% had an ECOG PS of 1, and 9.1% had an ECOG PS of 2. Approximately 81.8% were male and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Prior attempts at curative treatment with chemotherapy had been used in 68.2% of patients (platinum was used in 55.8%). There was no grade 5 toxicity noted (toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (18.2% of patients with grade 3) and rash (13.6% of patients with grade 3). The primary objective was met; the median overall survival was 10.7 months (90% confidence interval [90% CI], 8.7‐12.9 months). The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI, 15%‐38%). The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.6‐5.1 months). The results were not substantially different when subdivided by p16 status. Only 2 patients were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS The current study met its primary objective of survival comparable to the combination of cisplatin, 5‐FU and cetuximab regimen, and the toxicity of this all‐oral regimen was tolerable. Cancer 2016;122:2350–2355. © 2016 American Cancer Society. In the current study, patients receiving first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all‐oral regimen of capecitabine and lapatinib. The median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 10.7 months. |
Author | Olson, Juneko Grilley Bagley, Stephen Langer, Corey Weiss, Jared M. Hayes, David Neil Bauml, Joshua Cohen, Roger B. Hwang, Wei‐Ting |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jared M. surname: Weiss fullname: Weiss, Jared M. organization: University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center – sequence: 2 givenname: Stephen surname: Bagley fullname: Bagley, Stephen organization: University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center – sequence: 3 givenname: Wei‐Ting surname: Hwang fullname: Hwang, Wei‐Ting organization: University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine – sequence: 4 givenname: Joshua surname: Bauml fullname: Bauml, Joshua organization: University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center – sequence: 5 givenname: Juneko Grilley surname: Olson fullname: Olson, Juneko Grilley organization: University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center – sequence: 6 givenname: Roger B. surname: Cohen fullname: Cohen, Roger B. organization: University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center – sequence: 7 givenname: David Neil surname: Hayes fullname: Hayes, David Neil organization: University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center – sequence: 8 givenname: Corey surname: Langer fullname: Langer, Corey organization: University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkc1q3TAQhUVJaG7SbvoARctScDKS9eO7LCb9gdBASKE7IUtjotaWbySZkF0foc_YJ6mdm2xKKV0NM3znMJxzTA7iFJGQVwxOGQA_c9Gl0xpA6Wdkw2CrK2CCH5ANADSVFPXXI3Kc87dl1VzWz8kR12yrQaoNuWvtDl0otgsRqY2eDnZnS4iho_2UaLlB2oeUy68fP4cVKQltGTEWOvV0xGJzWXB3ltDNKa33G7T-wSmi-07z7WzHac7U4TBQZ5MLcRrtC3LY2yHjy8d5Qr68P79uP1YXlx8-te8uKieU0JX0DTila-U70fXOo-gaWzPJODZcI3PKOuag1sAb8J4JhQK5FYheSuma-oS82fvu0nQ7Yy5mDHl9xUZcvjKsYWwLwBT7DxSUELXkakFfP6JzN6I3uxRGm-7NU64LAHvApSnnhL1ZMy5hiiXZMBgGZq3OrNWZh-oWyds_JE-uf4XZHr4LA97_gzTt5_Zqr_kNkmCrlQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2022_13297 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctrv_2024_102864 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_019_6308_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2022_101426 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_09722_x crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13143545 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_adaj_2017_08_046 crossref_primary_10_1080_13543784_2019_1581172 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_31526 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11195582 crossref_primary_10_1002_adsc_201601434 crossref_primary_10_3892_ijo_2016_3821 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13215471 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rvsc_2024_105363 crossref_primary_10_3892_wasj_2022_170 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2018_1493925 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijc_IJC_746_18 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers11101552 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0042_1756663 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00242-2 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.110 10.1056/NEJMoa0802656 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1432 10.2147/OTT.S68235 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2891 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605697 10.1056/NEJMoa064320 10.1007/s10549-007-9885-0 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70124-5 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1245 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7812 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00603.x 10.1177/1078155213510542 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2825 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2016 American Cancer Society 2016 American Cancer Society. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 American Cancer Society – notice: 2016 American Cancer Society. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7TO H94 |
DOI | 10.1002/cncr.30067 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1097-0142 |
EndPage | 2355 |
ExternalDocumentID | 27197056 10_1002_cncr_30067 CNCR30067 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: K12 CA120780 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: P30 CA016520 |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .GA 05W 0R~ 10A 1CY 1L6 1OC 24P 29B 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5VS 66C 6J9 6P2 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 85S 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANLZ AAONW AAQOH AARRQ AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABHFT ABIJN ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABOCM ABPPZ ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AIACR AIAGR AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM E3Z EBS EJD EMOBN EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FD6 FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA GX1 H.X HBH HGLYW HHY HHZ HZ~ IH2 IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ KZ1 L7B LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LH4 LITHE LMP LOXES LP6 LP7 LSO LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K ROL RWI RX1 RYL SJN SUPJJ TEORI UDS UHB V2E V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XPP XV2 Z0Y ZGI ZZTAW ~IA ~WT .GJ .Y3 31~ 3O- AAYXX ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEYWJ AFFNX AGHNM AGNAY AGYGG AI. AIWBW AJBDE C1A CITATION HF~ H~9 J5H N4W NEJ OHT RSU VH1 WHG Y6R YQJ ZXP AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7TO H94 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4647-5d80c6736db4bfcde4b8a31512e827e1c6ac1c0370280dd146e4e2a4eed555c83 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 00:40:15 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:11:54 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:49:12 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:44 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:09:18 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 17:04:50 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 15 |
Keywords | head and neck neoplasms toxicity lapatinib capecitabine survival |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2016 American Cancer Society. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4647-5d80c6736db4bfcde4b8a31512e827e1c6ac1c0370280dd146e4e2a4eed555c83 |
Notes | We thank the patients and families who participated in this study as well as the study nurses and coordinators. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/cncr.30067 |
PMID | 27197056 |
PQID | 1806443526 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1811900161 proquest_miscellaneous_1806443526 pubmed_primary_27197056 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_cncr_30067 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_30067 wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_30067_CNCR30067 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | August 1, 2016 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2016 text: August 1, 2016 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Cancer |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cancer |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
References | 2015; 16 2002; 184 1997; 15 2010; 102 2015; 21 2008; 37 2008; 359 2012; 18 2008; 112 1992; 10 2012; 13 2015; 8 2007; 25 2014; 32 2014; 20 2006; 355 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 Harrington KJ (e_1_2_8_15_1) 2014; 32 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 102 start-page: 1687 year: 2010 end-page: 1691 article-title: Phase II study of capecitabine as palliative treatment for patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous head and neck cancer after previous platinum‐based treatment publication-title: Br J Cancer. – volume: 32 start-page: Page issue: 5 suppl year: 2014 article-title: Final analysis: a randomized, blinded, placebo (P)‐controlled phase III study of adjuvant postoperative lapatinib (L) with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CH‐RT) in high‐risk patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) [abstract] publication-title: J Clin Oncol. – volume: 18 start-page: 2336 year: 2012 end-page: 2343 article-title: A phase II study of lapatinib in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck publication-title: Clin Cancer Res. – volume: 21 start-page: 526 year: 2015 end-page: 533 article-title: HER2 as a therapeutic target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma publication-title: Clin Cancer Res. – volume: 10 start-page: 1245 year: 1992 end-page: 1251 article-title: Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study publication-title: J Clin Oncol. – volume: 359 start-page: 1116 year: 2008 end-page: 1127 article-title: Platinum‐based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 20 start-page: 409 year: 2014 end-page: 416 article-title: Incidence of cetuximab‐related infusion reactions in oncology patients treated at the University of North Carolina Cancer Hospital publication-title: J Oncol Pharm Pract. – volume: 37 start-page: 145 year: 2008 end-page: 150 article-title: Comparative analysis of c‐erbB‐2 (HER‐2/neu) in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: does over‐expression exist? And what is its correlation with traditional diagnostic parameters? publication-title: J Oral Pathol Med. – volume: 355 start-page: 2733 year: 2006 end-page: 2743 article-title: Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2‐positive advanced breast cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 15 start-page: 110 year: 1997 end-page: 115 article-title: Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy publication-title: J Clin Oncol. – volume: 13 start-page: 2891 year: 2012 end-page: 2896 article-title: HER2/neu expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients is not significantly elevated publication-title: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. – volume: 8 start-page: 335 year: 2015 end-page: 345 article-title: Cytotoxic effect of lapatinib is restricted to human papillomavirus‐positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines publication-title: Onco Targets Ther. – volume: 25 start-page: 3644 year: 2007 end-page: 3648 article-title: High incidence of cetuximab‐related infusion reactions in Tennessee and North Carolina and the association with atopic history publication-title: J Clin Oncol. – volume: 184 start-page: 223 year: 2002 end-page: 230 article-title: The expression of p53, c‐erbB‐1 and c‐erbB‐2 molecules and their correlation with prognostic markers in patients with head and neck tumors publication-title: Cancer Lett. – volume: 16 start-page: 583 year: 2015 end-page: 594 article-title: Afatinib versus methotrexate as second‐line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum‐based therapy (LUX‐Head & Neck 1): an open‐label, randomised phase 3 trial publication-title: Lancet Oncol. – volume: 112 start-page: 533 year: 2008 end-page: 543 article-title: A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat. – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00242-2 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.110 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802656 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1432 – volume: 32 start-page: Page issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 article-title: Final analysis: a randomized, blinded, placebo (P)‐controlled phase III study of adjuvant postoperative lapatinib (L) with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CH‐RT) in high‐risk patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) [abstract] publication-title: J Clin Oncol. – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.2147/OTT.S68235 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2891 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605697 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064320 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9885-0 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70124-5 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1245 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7812 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00603.x – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1177/1078155213510542 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2825 |
SSID | ssj0007253 |
Score | 2.3094702 |
Snippet | BACKGROUND
The combination of cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer,... In the current study, patients receiving first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer were treated with the all‐oral regimen... The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a high... BACKGROUND The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab is a standard treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer,... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 2350 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use capecitabine Capecitabine - administration & dosage Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Female head and neck neoplasms Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy Head and Neck Neoplasms - mortality Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology Humans Lapatinib Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Neoplasm Staging Quinazolines - administration & dosage Retreatment Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck survival toxicity Treatment Outcome |
Title | Capecitabine and lapatinib for the first‐line treatment of metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fcncr.30067 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197056 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1806443526 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1811900161 |
Volume | 122 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fS9xAEB_EB-lL1dbWq1q21JcWciabzW0OfJGjIgV9kAr3UsLu7AYOdc9qDsEnP4Kf0U_iTJLLYVuE9i2BSfbvzPx2d_Y3ALu5yuJUYRKV5N0jRW-R1TKPstL4zKSxdJ4vOB-fDI7O1PdxNl6C_fldmIYfottwY82o7TUruLE3ewvSUAx43U_Z2pIB5mAtRkSnC-4oLVsKyphKVum44yaVe4tPn3ujPyDmc8Rau5zDVfg5r2wTaXLen1W2j3e_8Tj-b2vW4HWLRcVBM3nWYcmHN7By3J62v4XbkeHs9JWh1bMXJjhxYTgAO0ysIKwrCDuKckLw8fH-gWsguqh1MS3Fpa8MX1eaIO8ENTRQgky_q_8UPJ6Lm18zw1sPgo8PBHJaozC9NBtwdvjtx-goahM1RKgGSkeZy2PkADFnlS3ReWVzkzKW8LnUPsGBwQTjVPM5rnNknL3y0ijyz1mWYZ6-g-UwDX4TBA6VkspZU5KMMmQChwShnPZDJEFte_BlPmAFtizmnEzjomj4l2XBPVnUPdmDz53sVcPd8VepT_NxL0i1uMEmeGp7keSE1xQnEHhJJiFIxbi5B--bSdOVJXUy1AQwe_C1HvoXKlGMTkan9dOHfxHeglcE4AZNQOI2LFfXM79DIKmyH2tleALGkQ9Z |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB5BkYAL78LyNIILSNkmjrPOHtGKaoHuHqpW2ltkjx1p1dYLbVZInPgJ_EZ-CTNOmlUBVYJbIk3i54w_j8ffALwuVZHmCrOkptU9UfSWWC3LpKiNL0yeSuf5gvNsPpoeqo-LYtHF5vBdmJYfone4sWZEe80Kzg7pnQ1rKAY8HeZsbq_CNU7pHXdU-xv2KC07EsqUylb5omcnlTubby-uR3-AzIuYNS46u7fbzKpnkauQY02OhuvGDvHbb0yO_92eO3Crg6PiXTt_7sIVH-7B9Vl34H4fvk4MJ6hvDG2gvTDBiWPDMdhhaQXBXUHwUdRLQpA_v__gKog-cF2sanHiG8M3lpbIzqCWCUqQ9XfxT8HjkTj7sjbsfRB8giCQMxuF1Yl5AIe77w8m06TL1ZCgGimdFK5MkWPEnFW2RueVLU3OcMKXUvsMRwYzTHPNR7nOkX32ykujaIkuigLLfBu2wir4RyBwrJRUzpqaZJQhKzgmFOW0HyMJajuAN-cjVmFHZM75NI6rloJZVtyTVezJAbzqZT-39B1_lXp5PvAVaRc32ARPba-ykiCb4hwCl8lkhKoYOg_gYTtr-rKkzsaaMOYA3saxv6QS1WQ-2Y9Pj_9F-AXcmB7M9qq9D_NPT-Am4blRG5_4FLaa07V_Rpipsc-jZvwCoTUTdA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEB9qheKL39bzc0VfFHJNNptsDnyRq0f96CHFwr1I2J3dwNF2r9Ycgk_-Cf6N_iXOJLkcVSnoWwKT7OfM_HZ39jcAzwqVxanCJKrIu0eK3iKrZRFllfGZSWPpPF9w3p_me4fq7SybbcDL1V2Ylh-i33BjzWjsNSv4qat21qShGPBsmLK1vQSXVR4XPKd3D9bkUVp2HJQxFa3SWU9OKnfW3553R39gzPOQtfE5k2vwaVXbNtTkaLis7RC__Ubk-L_NuQ5XOzAqXrWz5wZs-HATtva74_Zb8HVsOD19bWj57IUJThwbjsAOcysI7AoCj6KaE378-f0H10D0YetiUYkTXxu-rzRH3gpqeaAE2X7X_Cl4PBJfPi8N7z0IPj8QyHmNwuLE3IbDyeuP472oy9QQocqVjjJXxMgRYs4qW6HzyhYmZTDhC6l9grnBBONU80Guc2SdvfLSKHLQWZZhkd6BzbAI_i4IHCkllbOmIhllyAaOCEM57UdIgtoO4PlqwErsaMw5m8Zx2RIwy5J7smx6cgBPe9nTlrzjr1JPVuNekm5xg03w1PYyKQiwKc4gcJFMQpiKgfMAtttJ05cldTLShDAH8KIZ-gsqUY6n44Pm6d6_CD-GrQ-7k_L9m-m7-3CFwFzeBic-gM36bOkfEmCq7aNGL34BfvkSLA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capecitabine+and+lapatinib+for+the+first-line+treatment+of+metastatic%2Frecurrent+head+and+neck+squamous+cell+carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Weiss%2C+Jared+M&rft.au=Bagley%2C+Stephen&rft.au=Hwang%2C+Wei-Ting&rft.au=Bauml%2C+Joshua&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=2350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fcncr.30067&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27197056&rft.externalDocID=27197056 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0008-543X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0008-543X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0008-543X&client=summon |