Automated and Continuous Monitoring of Animal Welfare through Digital Alerting

• Published in: Comparative medicine Vol. 70; no. 4; pp. 313 - 327
• Main Authors: Do, Johnny P, Defensor, Erwin B, Ichim, Christine V, Lim, Maria A, Mechanic, Jordan A, Rabe, Mark D, Schaevitz, Laura R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 01.08.2020
• Subjects: Algorithms; Animal Experimentation - ethics; Animal Experimentation - standards; Animal Welfare - standards; Animals; Animals, Laboratory; Female; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods; Original Research; Retrospective Studies
• DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-19-000090
• ISSN: 1532-0820; 2769-819X

A primary goal in preclinical animal research is respectful and responsible care aimed toward minimizing stress and discomfort while enhancing collection of accurate and reproducible scientific data. Researchers use hands-on clinical observations and measurements as part of routine husbandry procedures or study protocols to monitor animal welfare. Although frequent assessments ensure the timely identification of animals with declining health, increased handling can result in additional stress on the animal and increased study variability. We investigated whether automated alerting regarding changes in behavior and physiology can complement existing welfare assessments to improve the identification of animals in pain or distress. Using historical data collected from a diverse range of therapeutic models, we developed algorithms that detect changes in motion and breathing rate frequently associated with sick animals but rare in healthy controls. To avoid introducing selec- tion bias, we evaluated the performance of these algorithms by using retrospective analysis of all studies occurring over a 31-d period in our vivarium. Analyses revealed that the majority of the automated alerts occurred prior to or simultaneously with technicians' observations of declining health in animals. Additional analyses performed across the entire duration of 2 studies (animal models of rapid aging and lung metastasis) demonstrated the sensitivity, accuracy, and utility of automated alerting for detecting unhealthy subjects and those eligible for humane endpoints. The percentage of alerts per total subject days ranged between 0% and 24%, depending on the animal model. Automated alerting effectively complements standard clinical observations to enhance animal welfare and promote responsible scientific advancement.