Clearance of Somatic Mutations at Remission and the Risk of Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

• Published in: Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 36; no. 18; pp. 1788 - 1797
• Main Authors: Morita, Kiyomi, Kantarjian, Hagop M., Wang, Feng, Yan, Yuanqing, Bueso-Ramos, Carlos, Sasaki, Koji, Issa, Ghayas C., Wang, Sa, Jorgensen, Jeffrey, Song, Xingzhi, Zhang, Jianhua, Tippen, Samantha, Thornton, Rebecca, Coyle, Marcus, Little, Latasha, Gumbs, Curtis, Pemmaraju, Naveen, Daver, Naval, DiNardo, Courtney D., Konopleva, Marina, Andreeff, Michael, Ravandi, Farhad, Cortes, Jorge E., Kadia, Tapan, Jabbour, Elias, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Patel, Keyur P., Futreal, P. Andrew, Takahashi, Koichi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Society of Clinical Oncology 20.06.2018
• Subjects: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clofarabine - administration & dosage; Cohort Studies; Cytarabine - administration & dosage; DNA, Neoplasm - genetics; Female; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - methods; Humans; Idarubicin - administration & dosage; Induction Chemotherapy; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - mortality; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; RAPID COMMUNICATION; Recurrence; Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods; Vidarabine - administration & dosage; Vidarabine - analogs & derivatives
• DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6757
• ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755

Purpose The aim of the current study was to determine whether the degree of mutation clearance at remission predicts the risk of relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods One hundred thirty-one previously untreated patients with AML who received intensive induction chemotherapy and attained morphologic complete remission (CR) at day 30 were studied. Pretreatment and CR bone marrow were analyzed using targeted capture DNA sequencing. We analyzed the association between mutation clearance (MC) on the basis of variant allele frequency (VAF) at CR (MC2.5: if the VAF of residual mutations was < 2.5%; MC1.0: if the VAF was < 1%; and complete MC [CMC]: if no detectable residual mutations) and event-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Results MC1.0 and CMC were associated with significantly better OS (2-year OS: 75% v 61% in MC1.0 v non-MC1.0; P = .0465; 2-year OS: 77% v 60% in CMC v non-CMC; P = .0303) and lower CIR (2-year CIR: 26% v 46% in MC1.0 v non-MC 1.0; P = .0349; 2 year-CIR: 24% v 46% in CMC v non-CMC; P = .03), whereas there was no significant difference in any of the above outcomes by MC2.5. Multivariable analysis adjusting for age, cytogenetic risk, allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and flow cytometry-based minimal residual disease revealed that patients with CMC had significantly better event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; P = .0083), OS (HR, 0.47; P = .04), and CIR (HR, 0.27; P < .001) than did patients without CMC. These prognostic associations were stronger when preleukemic mutations, such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1, were removed from the analysis. Conclusion Clearance of somatic mutation at CR, particularly in nonpreleukemic genes, was associated with significantly better survival and less risk of relapse. Somatic mutations in nonpreleukemic genes may function as a molecular minimal residual disease marker in AML.