Training Can Increase Students' Choices for Written Solution Strategies and Performance in Solving Multi-Digit Division Problems

Making adaptive choices between solution strategies is a central element of contemporary mathematics education. However, previous studies signal that students make suboptimal choices between mental and written strategies to solve division problems. In particular, some students of a lower math abilit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 9; p. 1644
Main Authors Fagginger Auer, Marije F, Hickendorff, Marian, van Putten, Cornelis M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 11.09.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Making adaptive choices between solution strategies is a central element of contemporary mathematics education. However, previous studies signal that students make suboptimal choices between mental and written strategies to solve division problems. In particular, some students of a lower math ability level appear inclined to use mental strategies that lead to lower performance. The current study uses a pretest-training-posttest design to investigate the extent to which these students' choices for written strategies and performance may be increased. Sixth graders of below-average mathematics level ( = 147) participated in one of two training conditions: an explicit-scaffolding training designed to promote writing down calculations or a practice-only training where strategy use was not explicitly targeted. Written strategy choices and performance increased considerably from pretest to posttest for students in both training conditions, but not in different amounts. Exploratory results suggest that students' strategy choices may also be affected by their attitudes and beliefs and the sociocultural context regarding strategy use.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Koen Luwel, KU Leuven, Belgium; Katherine M. Robinson, University of Regina, Canada
Edited by: Bert De Smedt, KU Leuven, Belgium
This article was submitted to Developmental Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01644