Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose with opioids for cesarean delivery: a prospective double-blinded randomized trial
•Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine doses with opioids were investigated.•The dose providing adequate anesthesia without epidural supplementation was 12mg.•Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with bupivacaine dose. Single-shot spinal anesthesia is commonly used for ces...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of obstetric anesthesia Vol. 31; pp. 68 - 73 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier Ltd
01.08.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0959-289X 1532-3374 1532-3374 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | •Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine doses with opioids were investigated.•The dose providing adequate anesthesia without epidural supplementation was 12mg.•Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with bupivacaine dose.
Single-shot spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery. Achieving adequate anesthesia throughout surgery needs to be balanced with associated complications. We investigated the optimal dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, co-administered with opioids, for anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging trial included parturients scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. An epidural catheter was first inserted at the T11–12 vertebral interspace, followed by spinal anesthesia at the L2–3 or L3–4 vertebral interspace. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of seven doses of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12mg), with added 15μg fentanyl and 75μg morphine. Successful induction of anesthesia (successind) was defined as achievement of bilateral sensory loss to cold at the T6 dermatome or higher, within 10 minutes. Successful maintenance of anesthesia (successmain) was defined by no epidural supplementation within 60 minutes of intrathecal injection. The effective doses for 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of patients were estimated using logistic regression analysis.
The ED50 and ED95 for successmain were 6.0mg (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.5mg) and 12.6mg (95% CI: 7.9 to 17.2mg), respectively. The incidence of respiratory discomfort and maternal satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between dose groups. Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with increasing doses of bupivacaine.
Under study conditions, our results suggest that 12.6mg of intrathecal bupivacaine, administered with fentanyl and morphine, is required to achieve adequate intraoperative analgesia without the need for epidural supplemention. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Single-shot spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery. Achieving adequate anesthesia throughout surgery needs to be balanced with associated complications. We investigated the optimal dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, co-administered with opioids, for anesthesia for cesarean delivery.BACKGROUNDSingle-shot spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery. Achieving adequate anesthesia throughout surgery needs to be balanced with associated complications. We investigated the optimal dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, co-administered with opioids, for anesthesia for cesarean delivery.This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging trial included parturients scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. An epidural catheter was first inserted at the T11-12 vertebral interspace, followed by spinal anesthesia at the L2-3 or L3-4 vertebral interspace. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of seven doses of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12mg), with added 15μg fentanyl and 75μg morphine. Successful induction of anesthesia (successind) was defined as achievement of bilateral sensory loss to cold at the T6 dermatome or higher, within 10 minutes. Successful maintenance of anesthesia (successmain) was defined by no epidural supplementation within 60 minutes of intrathecal injection. The effective doses for 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of patients were estimated using logistic regression analysis.METHODSThis prospective, randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging trial included parturients scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. An epidural catheter was first inserted at the T11-12 vertebral interspace, followed by spinal anesthesia at the L2-3 or L3-4 vertebral interspace. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of seven doses of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12mg), with added 15μg fentanyl and 75μg morphine. Successful induction of anesthesia (successind) was defined as achievement of bilateral sensory loss to cold at the T6 dermatome or higher, within 10 minutes. Successful maintenance of anesthesia (successmain) was defined by no epidural supplementation within 60 minutes of intrathecal injection. The effective doses for 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of patients were estimated using logistic regression analysis.The ED50 and ED95 for successmain were 6.0mg (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.5mg) and 12.6mg (95% CI: 7.9 to 17.2mg), respectively. The incidence of respiratory discomfort and maternal satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between dose groups. Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with increasing doses of bupivacaine.RESULTSThe ED50 and ED95 for successmain were 6.0mg (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.5mg) and 12.6mg (95% CI: 7.9 to 17.2mg), respectively. The incidence of respiratory discomfort and maternal satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between dose groups. Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with increasing doses of bupivacaine.Under study conditions, our results suggest that 12.6mg of intrathecal bupivacaine, administered with fentanyl and morphine, is required to achieve adequate intraoperative analgesia without the need for epidural supplemention.CONCLUSIONUnder study conditions, our results suggest that 12.6mg of intrathecal bupivacaine, administered with fentanyl and morphine, is required to achieve adequate intraoperative analgesia without the need for epidural supplemention. Single-shot spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery. Achieving adequate anesthesia throughout surgery needs to be balanced with associated complications. We investigated the optimal dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, co-administered with opioids, for anesthesia for cesarean delivery. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging trial included parturients scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. An epidural catheter was first inserted at the T11-12 vertebral interspace, followed by spinal anesthesia at the L2-3 or L3-4 vertebral interspace. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of seven doses of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12mg), with added 15μg fentanyl and 75μg morphine. Successful induction of anesthesia (success ) was defined as achievement of bilateral sensory loss to cold at the T6 dermatome or higher, within 10 minutes. Successful maintenance of anesthesia (success ) was defined by no epidural supplementation within 60 minutes of intrathecal injection. The effective doses for 50% (ED ) and 95% (ED ) of patients were estimated using logistic regression analysis. The ED and ED for success were 6.0mg (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.5mg) and 12.6mg (95% CI: 7.9 to 17.2mg), respectively. The incidence of respiratory discomfort and maternal satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between dose groups. Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with increasing doses of bupivacaine. Under study conditions, our results suggest that 12.6mg of intrathecal bupivacaine, administered with fentanyl and morphine, is required to achieve adequate intraoperative analgesia without the need for epidural supplemention. •Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine doses with opioids were investigated.•The dose providing adequate anesthesia without epidural supplementation was 12mg.•Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with bupivacaine dose. Single-shot spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery. Achieving adequate anesthesia throughout surgery needs to be balanced with associated complications. We investigated the optimal dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine, co-administered with opioids, for anesthesia for cesarean delivery. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging trial included parturients scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. An epidural catheter was first inserted at the T11–12 vertebral interspace, followed by spinal anesthesia at the L2–3 or L3–4 vertebral interspace. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of seven doses of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12mg), with added 15μg fentanyl and 75μg morphine. Successful induction of anesthesia (successind) was defined as achievement of bilateral sensory loss to cold at the T6 dermatome or higher, within 10 minutes. Successful maintenance of anesthesia (successmain) was defined by no epidural supplementation within 60 minutes of intrathecal injection. The effective doses for 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of patients were estimated using logistic regression analysis. The ED50 and ED95 for successmain were 6.0mg (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.5mg) and 12.6mg (95% CI: 7.9 to 17.2mg), respectively. The incidence of respiratory discomfort and maternal satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between dose groups. Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with increasing doses of bupivacaine. Under study conditions, our results suggest that 12.6mg of intrathecal bupivacaine, administered with fentanyl and morphine, is required to achieve adequate intraoperative analgesia without the need for epidural supplemention. Highlights • Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine doses with opioids were investigated. • The dose providing adequate anesthesia without epidural supplementation was 12 mg. • Phenylephrine dose and nausea/vomiting incidence increased with bupivacaine dose. |
Author | Onishi, Eiko Kaneko, Miho Murakami, Mamoru Hashimoto, Keiji |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eiko surname: Onishi fullname: Onishi, Eiko email: e-onishi@med.tohoku.ac.jp organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan – sequence: 2 givenname: Mamoru surname: Murakami fullname: Murakami, Mamoru organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Tohoku Kosai Hospital, 2-3-11, Kokubuncho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan – sequence: 3 givenname: Keiji surname: Hashimoto fullname: Hashimoto, Keiji organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Kesennuma City Hospital, 184 Tanaka, Kesennuma, Miyagi, Japan – sequence: 4 givenname: Miho surname: Kaneko fullname: Kaneko, Miho organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28623089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkkuLFDEUhYOMOA_9Ay4kSzfV5lGdSgYRhsEXDMxCBXchldyib1tdKZOqlnbnPzdFz2wGHFe5XM53k5xzz8nJEAcg5CVnK864erNd4Ta6lWC8WbF6xRh_Qs74WopKyqY-IWfMrE0ltPl-Ss5z3jLGjNTqGTkVWgnJtDkjf27HCXeupzhMyU0b8KXeHEZIrUvoaTuPuHfe4QA0xAz0F04bGkeMGDLtYqIeskvgBhqgxz2kwyV1dEwxj-Cn0ijY3PZQtT0OAQJNbghxh79LOSV0_XPytHN9hhd35wX59uH91-tP1c3tx8_XVzeVr5WYKslME7TyjMtaNKZp1TowrZVsVas1KBE67aRvuJTKhOBKV7LGr2UXGA8dlxfk9XFuedvPGfJkd5g99L0bIM7ZcsNZY0xdmyJ9dSed2x0EO6ZiUTrYe9uKQB8FvvwzJ-isx8lNGBcTsbec2SUhu7VLQnZJyLLaloQKKh6g99Mfhd4eISgG7RGSzR5h8BAwFZdtiPg4_u4B7ksYWKL-AQfI2zinoVhvuc3CMvtl2ZtlbbiSjGvByoDLfw_43-1_AV3t1Hs |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_5812_fga_123101 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000006866 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000008892 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11111099 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9113600 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_6685584 crossref_primary_10_54393_pbmj_v5i2_286 crossref_primary_10_4103_joacc_JOACC_18_19 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000005518 crossref_primary_10_54393_pbmj_v5i1_260 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_024_02705_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2020_109706 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_15342 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.06.006 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-4.x 10.1111/anae.12034 10.1097/MD.0000000000003827 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00031 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318209a92d 10.1213/01.ane.0000189049.11005.26 10.1213/01.ane.0000220877.70380.6e 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.03.004 10.1097/00000542-199802000-00014 10.1097/00115550-200005000-00005 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282ff5e41 10.1097/00000542-199606000-00010 10.1093/bja/aer200 10.1038/bmt.2012.244 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07104.x 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.009 10.1093/bja/66.4.465 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00025 10.1002/sim.4780040112 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Ltd Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1532-3374 |
EndPage | 73 |
ExternalDocumentID | 28623089 10_1016_j_ijoa_2017_04_001 S0959289X16301820 1_s2_0_S0959289X16301820 |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF CS3 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HDV HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LX1 M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- O90 OAUVE OL- OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UV1 WUQ Z5R ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3097d86c01342797b65d08863b6b88e62df8a3c713369dda6b8307c53fd01df13 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0959-289X 1532-3374 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 08:26:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:01:33 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:28:22 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:12 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:47:20 EST 2024 Tue Feb 25 19:55:42 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 17:37:42 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Cesarean delivery Hyperbaric bupivacaine Spinal anesthesia |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c462t-3097d86c01342797b65d08863b6b88e62df8a3c713369dda6b8307c53fd01df13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 28623089 |
PQID | 1910799449 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1910799449 pubmed_primary_28623089 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijoa_2017_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2017_04_001 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijoa_2017_04_001 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0959289X16301820 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijoa_2017_04_001 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2017 text: 2017-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands |
PublicationTitle | International journal of obstetric anesthesia |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Obstet Anesth |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Arzola, Wieczorek (b0035) 2011; 107 Rucklidge, Paech (b0010) 2012; 67 Russell (b0080) 2006; 15 Ousley, Egan, Dowling, Cyna (b0075) 2012; 67 Hogan, Prost, Kulier, Taylor, Liu, Mark (b0065) 1996; 84 Weigl, Bierylo, Wielgus (b0090) 2016; 95 Teoh, Thomas, Tan (b0030) 2006; 15 Kanda (b0055) 2013; 48 Choi, Ahn, Kim (b0025) 2006; 15 Ben-David, Miller, Gavriel, Gurevitch (b0020) 2000; 25 Ginosar, Mirikatani, Drover, Cohen, Riley (b0040) 2004; 100 Roofthooft, Van de Velde (b0005) 2008; 21 Faul, Erdfelder, Buchner, Lang (b0045) 2009; 41 Carvalho, Collins, Drover, Atkinson Ralls, Riley (b0070) 2011; 114 Carvalho, Durbin, Drover, Cohen, Ginosar, Riley (b0060) 2005; 103 Lowson, Brown, Wilkins (b0100) 1991; 66 Cuzick (b0050) 1985; 4 Palmer, Cork, Hays, Van Maren, Alves (b0095) 1998; 88 Coppejans, Hendrickx, Goossens, Vercauteren (b0085) 2006; 102 Van de Velde, Van Schoubroeck, Jani, Teunkens, Missant, Deprest (b0015) 2006; 103 Broadbent, Maxwell, Ferrie, Wilson, Gawne-Cain, Russell (b0105) 2000; 55 Arzola (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0035) 2011; 107 Russell (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0080) 2006; 15 Carvalho (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0060) 2005; 103 Palmer (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0095) 1998; 88 Ginosar (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0040) 2004; 100 Ben-David (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0020) 2000; 25 Faul (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0045) 2009; 41 Kanda (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0055) 2013; 48 Roofthooft (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0005) 2008; 21 Weigl (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0090) 2016; 95 Rucklidge (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0010) 2012; 67 Van de Velde (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0015) 2006; 103 Hogan (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0065) 1996; 84 Broadbent (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0105) 2000; 55 Coppejans (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0085) 2006; 102 Carvalho (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0070) 2011; 114 Teoh (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0030) 2006; 15 Cuzick (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0050) 1985; 4 Ousley (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0075) 2012; 67 Lowson (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0100) 1991; 66 Choi (10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0025) 2006; 15 |
References_xml | – volume: 88 start-page: 355 year: 1998 end-page: 361 ident: b0095 article-title: The dose-response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 55 start-page: 1122 year: 2000 end-page: 1126 ident: b0105 article-title: Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace publication-title: Anaesthesia – volume: 67 start-page: 347 year: 2012 end-page: 351 ident: b0010 article-title: Limiting the dose of local anaesthetic for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia–has the limbo bar been set too low? publication-title: Anaesthesia – volume: 102 start-page: 243 year: 2006 end-page: 247 ident: b0085 article-title: The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 48 start-page: 452 year: 2013 end-page: 458 ident: b0055 article-title: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics publication-title: Bone Marrow Transplant – volume: 15 start-page: 13 year: 2006 end-page: 17 ident: b0025 article-title: Combined low-dose spinal-epidural anesthesia versus single-shot spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth – volume: 67 start-page: 1356 year: 2012 end-page: 1363 ident: b0075 article-title: Assessment of block height for satisfactory spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section publication-title: Anaesthesia – volume: 95 start-page: e3827 year: 2016 ident: b0090 article-title: Analgesic efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl during the period of highest analgesic demand after cesarean section: a randomized controlled study publication-title: Medicine (Baltimore) – volume: 21 start-page: 259 year: 2008 end-page: 262 ident: b0005 article-title: Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension publication-title: Curr Opin Anaesthesiol – volume: 4 start-page: 87 year: 1985 end-page: 90 ident: b0050 article-title: A Wilcoxon-type test for trend publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 103 start-page: 187 year: 2006 end-page: 190 ident: b0015 article-title: Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 103 start-page: 606 year: 2005 end-page: 612 ident: b0060 article-title: The ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine with opioids for cesarean delivery publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 25 start-page: 235 year: 2000 end-page: 239 ident: b0020 article-title: Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med – volume: 114 start-page: 529 year: 2011 end-page: 535 ident: b0070 article-title: ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 107 start-page: 308 year: 2011 end-page: 318 ident: b0035 article-title: Efficacy of low-dose bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 100 start-page: 676 year: 2004 end-page: 682 ident: b0040 article-title: ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine coadministered with opioids for cesarean delivery publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 15 start-page: 273 year: 2006 end-page: 278 ident: b0030 article-title: Ultra-low dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine 3.75 publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth – volume: 84 start-page: 1341 year: 1996 end-page: 1349 ident: b0065 article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid volume and the influence of body habitus and abdominal pressure publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 66 start-page: 465 year: 1991 end-page: 468 ident: b0100 article-title: Influence of the lumbar interspace chosen for injection on the spread of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 41 start-page: 1149 year: 2009 end-page: 1160 ident: b0045 article-title: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses publication-title: Behav Res Methods – volume: 15 start-page: 294 year: 2006 end-page: 297 ident: b0080 article-title: At caesarean section under regional anaesthesia, it is essential to test sensory block with light touch before allowing surgery to start publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth – volume: 15 start-page: 294 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0080 article-title: At caesarean section under regional anaesthesia, it is essential to test sensory block with light touch before allowing surgery to start publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.06.006 – volume: 55 start-page: 1122 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0105 article-title: Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-4.x – volume: 67 start-page: 1356 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0075 article-title: Assessment of block height for satisfactory spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1111/anae.12034 – volume: 95 start-page: e3827 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0090 article-title: Analgesic efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl during the period of highest analgesic demand after cesarean section: a randomized controlled study publication-title: Medicine (Baltimore) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003827 – volume: 100 start-page: 676 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0040 article-title: ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine coadministered with opioids for cesarean delivery publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00031 – volume: 114 start-page: 529 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0070 article-title: ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318209a92d – volume: 102 start-page: 243 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0085 article-title: The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189049.11005.26 – volume: 103 start-page: 187 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0015 article-title: Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000220877.70380.6e – volume: 15 start-page: 273 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0030 article-title: Ultra-low dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine 3.75mg for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.03.004 – volume: 88 start-page: 355 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0095 article-title: The dose-response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-199802000-00014 – volume: 25 start-page: 235 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0020 article-title: Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med doi: 10.1097/00115550-200005000-00005 – volume: 41 start-page: 1149 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0045 article-title: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses publication-title: Behav Res Methods doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 – volume: 21 start-page: 259 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0005 article-title: Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension publication-title: Curr Opin Anaesthesiol doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282ff5e41 – volume: 84 start-page: 1341 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0065 article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid volume and the influence of body habitus and abdominal pressure publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-199606000-00010 – volume: 107 start-page: 308 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0035 article-title: Efficacy of low-dose bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aer200 – volume: 48 start-page: 452 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0055 article-title: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics publication-title: Bone Marrow Transplant doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244 – volume: 67 start-page: 347 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0010 article-title: Limiting the dose of local anaesthetic for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia–has the limbo bar been set too low? publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07104.x – volume: 15 start-page: 13 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0025 article-title: Combined low-dose spinal-epidural anesthesia versus single-shot spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.009 – volume: 66 start-page: 465 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0100 article-title: Influence of the lumbar interspace chosen for injection on the spread of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/66.4.465 – volume: 103 start-page: 606 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0060 article-title: The ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine with opioids for cesarean delivery publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00025 – volume: 4 start-page: 87 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001_b0050 article-title: A Wilcoxon-type test for trend publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040112 |
SSID | ssj0009386 |
Score | 2.183307 |
Snippet | •Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine doses with opioids were investigated.•The dose providing adequate anesthesia without epidural supplementation was... Highlights • Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine doses with opioids were investigated. • The dose providing adequate anesthesia without epidural... Single-shot spinal anesthesia is commonly used for cesarean delivery. Achieving adequate anesthesia throughout surgery needs to be balanced with associated... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 68 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods Anesthetics, Intravenous Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Bupivacaine - administration & dosage Cesarean delivery Cesarean Section - methods Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Double-Blind Method Female Fentanyl Humans Hyperbaric bupivacaine Injections, Spinal Morphine Obstetrics and Gynecology Patient Satisfaction Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology Pregnancy Prospective Studies Spinal anesthesia |
Title | Optimal intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose with opioids for cesarean delivery: a prospective double-blinded randomized trial |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0959289X16301820 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0959289X16301820 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.04.001 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28623089 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1910799449 |
Volume | 31 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3di9QwEA_HCeKL-O36cUTwTeq2TZoP347DY1XufNCDfQtpkmKOvXaxu4I-CP7nzrTpinie4FtbZkiaSSa_SeaDkOcNl2AkNHlWFcpn3PMms6EImQP6snCB8cHl_-RULM7422W13CNHUywMulUm3T_q9EFbpy_zNJrzdYzzD3iCBebCEhBFjmnIMYKdS3Tre_n9l5uHZkO1x-G4C6lT4Mzo4xXPO8w9VMgh3WkqDHPJ5vQ38DlsQse3yM2EHunh2MHbZC-0d8j1k3Q_fpf8eA8a4AIoIp7ZArYDCdBPYGripUJ0tN6u4xfrLBBT3_WB4jEs7daxi76ngF8pqA0LOLKlPqzQZePrK2op9GuKyAS2bb0KWb3CPIuewlbnu4v4DR6HAiD3yNnx649HiywVWcgcF-UmY7mWXgkHUJCXUstaVB40j2C1qJUKovSNssyhLSu09xa-glpwFWt8XvimYPfJftu14SGhTjslQbzBYk6c2irFrA2O1V6o0gk1I8U0usalDORYCGNlJlezc4MSMSgRk3P0t5uRFzue9Zh_40pqNgnNTJGloAsNbA9XcsnLuEKflnNvCtOXJjd_TLkZqXacv83af7b4bJpRBpYz3tHYNnRbaAngm9Sacz0jD8aptvvvEqxPliv96D9bfUxu4NvovviE7G8-b8NTgFSb-mBYMwfk2uGbd4vTn8KBIfE |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwED-NTgJeEN-UTyPxhqImses4vE0TU8fW8sAm9c1ybEdk6pKKtEjwxn_OXeIUIcaQeIscn5z47PPv7PPvAN6UIkMnoYyjaaJcJJwoI-MTH1msnybWc9GF_M8XcnYuPiynyz04HO7CUFhlsP29Te-sdSiZhN6crKtq8ol2sNBdWCKiiImG_AbsEzuVGMH-wfHJbPGLe5d3CR-7HS8SCHdn-jCv6qIh-qEk6xhPQ26YK9anv-HPbh06ugt3AoBkB_033oM9X9-Hm_NwRP4AfnxEI3CJNSratkV4h0pgn9HbpHOFyrJiu66-GmuwMnNN6xntxLJmXTWVaxlCWIaWwyCUrJnzK4ra-PaOGYbfNVzKRLFtsfJRsSKqRcdwtXPNZfUdH7scIA_h_Oj92eEsCnkWIitkuol4nGdOSYtoUKRZnhVy6tD4SF7IQikvU1cqwy25szJ3zmApWgY75aWLE1cm_BGM6qb2T4DZ3KoMNewN0eIURilujLe8cFKlVqoxJEPvahtIyCkXxkoP0WYXmjSiSSM6FhRyN4a3O5l1T8FxbW0-KE0Pl0vRHGpcIa6Vyq6S8m2Y0a1OdJvqWP8x6sYw3Un-NnD_2eLrYURpnNF0TGNq32yxJURwWZ4LkY_hcT_Udv-dogPKY5U__c9WX8Gt2dn8VJ8eL06ewW1600czPofR5svWv0CEtSlehhn0E5ryJKI |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal+intrathecal+hyperbaric+bupivacaine+dose+with+opioids+for+cesarean+delivery%3A+a+prospective+double-blinded+randomized+trial&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+obstetric+anesthesia&rft.au=Onishi%2C+Eiko&rft.au=Murakami%2C+Mamoru&rft.au=Hashimoto%2C+Keiji&rft.au=Kaneko%2C+Miho&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.issn=0959-289X&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=73&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijoa.2017.04.001&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_ijoa_2017_04_001 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0959-289X&client=summon |