Oligoantigenic Diet Improves Children's ADHD Rating Scale Scores Reliably in Added Video-Rating

• Published in: Frontiers in psychiatry Vol. 11; p. 730
• Main Authors: Dölp, Anna, Schneider-Momm, Katja, Heiser, Philip, Clement, Christina, Rauh, Reinhold, Clement, Hans-Willi, Schulz, Eberhard, Fleischhaker, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 20.08.2020
• Subjects: ADHD rating scale IV; adolescent; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; brain-gut axis; children; oligoantigenic diet; Psychiatry; children; inter-rater reliability; adolescent; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; brain-gut axis; oligoantigenic diet; video rating; ADHD rating scale IV
• ISSN: 1664-0640; 1664-0640
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00730

The influence of food intake on behavioural disorders was already described in the early 20th century. Elimination of individually allergenic food items from individual diets ["oligoantigenic diet" (OD)] showed promise to improve attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. However, only few of the positive results were evaluated by blinded symptom rating. Therefore the present study's purpose was to evaluate the reliability of a non-blinded rating of the ADHD Rating Scale IV (ARS) for the assessment of OD effects in comparison to a blinded rating of the ARS based on pseudonymized video recordings. Ten children (8m/2f) aged 8 to 14 with ADHD according to ICD-10 participated in an uncontrolled, open-label dietary intervention study. Food items, commonly related to intolerances, were eliminated for four weeks. Participants with > 40% improvement in the ARS between T1 (before the diet) and T2 (after the diet) were defined as responders. Nutrients with individual relevance to ADHD symptoms were identified in a following reintroduction phase (T3-T4) lasting 8-16 weeks. The ARS was completed by a non-blinded child and adolescent psychiatrist (T0-T4). Sessions were recorded on video, pseudonymized, and evaluated by three blinded raters. Complete data were captured for eight children. The inter-rater reliability between the non-blinded therapist and every blinded rater was determined by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations according to Pearson and Spearman between the non-blinded and blinded rating were calculated for each rater. Two blinded raters and the non-blinded rater considered 5 of 8 (62.5%) children as responders, whereas one blinded rater disagreed as to the success of one case thus considering only 4 of 8 children as responders to the diet. Inter-rater reliability was assessed after each rater having scored 33 videos: The intra-class coefficients were >.9 for all raters (rater 1: =.997, rater 2: =.996, rater 3: =.996) and the Spearman between the raters were high ( =33; rater 1: =.989, <.0001, rater 2: =.987, <.0001, rater 3: =.984, <.0001), respectively. As both, blinded and non-blinded ratings of the ARS, revealed relevant significant improvement of ADHD scores in children following an OD in this uncontrolled trial, Randomized controlled trials appear as highly desirable in order to replicate these improvements and to establish reliable and unbiased effect sizes thereby fostering further more objective confirmatory measurements.