A cohort study of the perinatal outcome of radiofrequency ablation in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies based on a different needle insert angle
Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles. Methods We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needl...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of international medical research Vol. 49; no. 5; p. 3000605211018432 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.05.2021
Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective
To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles.
Methods
We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles.
Results
The RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery.
Conclusion
RFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles.OBJECTIVETo compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles.We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles.METHODSWe performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles.The RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery.RESULTSThe RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery.RFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA.CONCLUSIONRFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA. Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles. Methods We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles. Results The RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery. Conclusion RFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA. Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles. Methods We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles. Results The RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery. Conclusion RFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA. |
Author | Fang, Liyuan Wu, Jing Shi, Lishuang Rao, Tengzi Liu, Qian Shi, Xiaomei |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Qian surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Qian organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiaomei surname: Shi fullname: Shi, Xiaomei organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Liyuan surname: Fang fullname: Fang, Liyuan organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Tengzi surname: Rao fullname: Rao, Tengzi organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Lishuang surname: Shi fullname: Shi, Lishuang organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Jing orcidid: 0000-0003-4213-4106 surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Jing email: wujing020@126.com organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China |
BookMark | eNp1kkuLFDEUhQsZcR76A9wF3LjpMY-qJLURhsHHwIAbXYdbqZvuNFVJm6SE_jHzX03ZgzKKqws553ycXO5lcxZiwKZ5zeg1Y0q9o4JSKmnHGaNMt4I_ay5Yq8SGV-GsuVj1zWo4by5z3lPactnxF825aKnQnPYXzcMNsXEXUyG5LOORREfKDskBkw9QYCJxKTbOuAoJRh9dwu8LBnskMExQfAzEh8qYD5O3UHAkcwzRVmSVvCXzMhV_mCoy4TZAsB4zGSBXY40CGb1zmDAUEhDH6vMhY60DYTvhy-a5gynjq8d51Xz7-OHr7efN_ZdPd7c39xvbSlY2FpSW1lEmkWulLAxoR90PwzBasNaq3oLo1SAZ5c71OMh-7AaqEHTPNdXiqrk7cccIe3NIfoZ0NBG8-fUQ09ZAKt5OaHgru7bttJJtHa7XQqjeAfQdt9IxWVnvT6zDMsw42vq1BNMT6FMl-J3Zxh9GM8m0EhXw9hGQYl11Lmb22eI0QcC4ZMM7IQRrtV57v_nLuo9LCnVVq6ujQgqmqoudXDbFnBO632UYNeshmX8OqWauT5kMW_xD_X_gJ5Hly7k |
Cites_doi | 10.1159/000445291 10.1002/uog.22682 10.1002/uog.4046 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.009 10.1067/mob.2002.125242 10.1002/uog.14879 10.1002/uog.7567 10.1159/000355406 10.1002/uog.11122 10.1111/1471-0528.15253 10.1002/pd.5269 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.043 10.1186/s12884-021-03656-1 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2021 The Author(s) 2021 Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2021 2021 SAGE Publications |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2021 – notice: The Author(s) 2021 Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2021 2021 SAGE Publications |
DBID | AFRWT AAYXX CITATION K9. 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1177/03000605211018432 |
DatabaseName | Open Access Journals from Sage CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Open Access Journals (DOAJ) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: AFRWT name: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology |
EISSN | 1473-2300 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_24654458764445f983379faa952c6f16 PMC8161873 10_1177_03000605211018432 10.1177_03000605211018432 |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau of Guangdong Province grantid: 20211051 funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100010883 – fundername: ; grantid: 20211051 |
GroupedDBID | --- .55 .GJ 01A 0R~ 29K 2WC 44B 53G 54M 5GY 5RE 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AABQO AACKU AAFWJ AAGGD AAJIQ AAJOX AAJPV AAJQC AANSI AAPEO AAQQG AAQXH AASGM AAXOT AAYTG AAZBJ ABAFQ ABAWP ABDWY ABHKI ABJNI ABNCE ABPGX ABQKF ABQXT ABUWG ABVFX ABXGC ABYTW ACARO ACFMA ACFYK ACGBL ACGFS ACLHI ACROE ADBBV ADEIA ADMPF ADOGD ADQSQ ADTBJ ADUKL AECVZ AEFTW AENEX AERKM AEUHG AEWDL AEXFG AFCOW AFKBI AFKRA AFKRG AFPKN AFRWT AIGRN AJABX AJEFB AJMMQ AJSCY AJUZI ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AUTPY AYAKG BAWUL BCNDV BDDNI BENPR BPHCQ BSEHC BVXVI CBRKF CCPQU CORYS CQQTX CUTAK D-I DC. DF. DIK E3Z EBD EBS EF0 EJD EMOBN F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION H13 HMCUK HYE J8X K.F KQ8 L7B MK0 O9- P2P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ Q1R ROL RPM S01 SAUOL SCDPB SCNPE SFC SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP X7M ZE2 ZGI AAYXX ACHEB CITATION OVT K9. 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-ca786cf016e2877cabecd89bbbdcaccc79ca397b6102ff9eb69d5b07ea8928083 |
IEDL.DBID | AFRWT |
ISSN | 0300-0605 1473-2300 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:27:28 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:59:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:39:05 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 09:16:50 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:28:57 EDT 2025 Sun Jun 22 05:40:20 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | Radiofrequency ablation multiple pregnancy pregnancy outcome needle insertion angle risk factor selective reduction |
Language | English |
License | Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c461t-ca786cf016e2877cabecd89bbbdcaccc79ca397b6102ff9eb69d5b07ea8928083 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4213-4106 |
OpenAccessLink | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03000605211018432?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider |
PMID | 34038209 |
PQID | 2535036317 |
PQPubID | 4451107 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_24654458764445f983379faa952c6f16 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8161873 proquest_miscellaneous_2533314888 proquest_journals_2535036317 crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605211018432 sage_journals_10_1177_03000605211018432 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2021 text: 2021-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London, England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London, England – name: London – name: Sage UK: London, England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of international medical research |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: Sage Publications Ltd – name: SAGE Publishing |
References | Rahimi-Sharbaf, Ghaemi, Nassr 2021; 21 Yinon, Ashwal, Weisz 2015; 46 Lewi, Jani, Blickstein 2008; 199 Agha, Abdall-Razak, Crossley 2019; 72 Moise, Johnson, Moise 2008; 198 Roman, Papanna, Johnson 2010; 36 Peng, Xie, Lin 2016; 81 Ting, Poon, Tse 2020 Tsao, Feldstein, Albanese 2002; 187 Bebbington, Danzer, Moldenhauer 2012; 40 Lu, Ting, Law 2013; 34 Prefumo, Jauniaux 2018; 125 Cabassa, Fichera, Prefumo 2013; 166 Gratacos, Lewi, Munoz 2007; 30 Sun, Zou, Yang 2018; 38 bibr3-03000605211018432 bibr4-03000605211018432 bibr7-03000605211018432 bibr15-03000605211018432 bibr12-03000605211018432 bibr5-03000605211018432 bibr11-03000605211018432 bibr8-03000605211018432 bibr14-03000605211018432 Lewi L (bibr2-03000605211018432) 2008; 199 bibr6-03000605211018432 bibr10-03000605211018432 bibr1-03000605211018432 bibr13-03000605211018432 bibr9-03000605211018432 |
References_xml | – volume: 198 start-page: 191 year: 2008 end-page: 198 article-title: Radiofrequency ablation for selective reduction in the complicated monochorionic gestation publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – year: 2020 article-title: Outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction in complicated monochorionic pregnancies performed before 16 gestational weeks and thereafter publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 199 year: 2008 article-title: The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 125 start-page: 1163 year: 2018 article-title: Twin-to-twin-transfusion syndrome: from amniodrainage to laser. publication-title: BJOG – volume: 40 start-page: 319 year: 2012 end-page: 324 article-title: Radiofrequency ablation vs bipolar umbilical cord coagulation in the management of complicated monochorionic pregnancies. publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 34 start-page: 211 year: 2013 end-page: 216 article-title: Radiofrequency Ablation for Selective Reduction in Complicated Monochorionic Multiple Pregnancies. publication-title: Fetal Diagn Ther – volume: 187 start-page: 635 year: 2002 end-page: 640 article-title: Selective reduction of acardiac twin by radiofrequency ablation. publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 36 start-page: 37 year: 2010 end-page: 41 article-title: Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: radiofrequency ablation vs. bipolar cord coagulation publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 38 start-page: 499 year: 2018 end-page: 503 article-title: Risk factors for fetal death after radiofrequency ablation for complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. publication-title: Prenat Diagn – volume: 21 start-page: 189 year: 2021 article-title: . Radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction in complicated Monochorionic twins; comparing the outcomes according to the indications publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth – volume: 72 start-page: 156 year: 2019 end-page: 165 article-title: STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. publication-title: Int J Surg – volume: 81 start-page: 552 year: 2016 end-page: 558 article-title: Clinical Outcomes after Selective Fetal Reduction of Complicated Monochorionic Twins with Radiofrequency Ablation and Bipolar Cord Coagulation. publication-title: Gynecol Obstet Invest – volume: 30 start-page: 28 year: 2007 end-page: 34 article-title: A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 46 start-page: 670 year: 2015 end-page: 677 article-title: Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic twins: prediction of obstetric outcome and comparison of techniques publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 166 start-page: 127 year: 2013 end-page: 132 article-title: The use of radiofrequency in the treatment of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a case series and review of the literature. publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol – ident: bibr11-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1159/000445291 – volume: 199 year: 2008 ident: bibr2-03000605211018432 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – ident: bibr9-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1002/uog.22682 – ident: bibr10-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1002/uog.4046 – ident: bibr6-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.009 – ident: bibr5-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125242 – ident: bibr12-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1002/uog.14879 – ident: bibr14-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1002/uog.7567 – ident: bibr15-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1159/000355406 – ident: bibr13-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1002/uog.11122 – ident: bibr1-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15253 – ident: bibr3-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1002/pd.5269 – ident: bibr7-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002 – ident: bibr8-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.043 – ident: bibr4-03000605211018432 doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03656-1 |
SSID | ssj0042652 |
Score | 2.256637 |
Snippet | Objective
To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle... Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle... To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref sage |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 3000605211018432 |
SubjectTerms | Abdomen Ablation Cohort analysis Gestational age Pregnancy Retrospective Clinical Research Report |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Open Access Journals (DOAJ) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Na9wwEBUlp15KP6nbtEyhpFBiWsuWLR3T0hAKLTkkkJuRZCldKHLweg_7Y_JfOyPZu3Gg9NLTwkq7a-88ed5Yz28Ye1_LDmmINrkVvM6rrqxybZ3NFZZAyvJaaUvPO__4WZ9dVt-vxNWdVl-kCUv2wOmP-8TJ8KsSuGgrfPFKlmWjvNZKcFv7IpptY86bi6l0Dca0I_i0hxntlcpoPCKo2qEGJ3yRhaJZ_4Jh3tdH3hF5xbxz-pg9mggjnKQDfcIeuPCUHZ0nx-ntMVzsH6BaH8MRnO-9qLfP2O0JUAvcYYToIwu9B2R8QPbGgW7cQL8ZEXOOBgbdrXo_JG31FrRJMjlYBdgJz10HiNser5kD3ci1MAsS4WZw16nV7xooNXaAH9UwN2AZIWCexHmrQPv_oMP1b_ecXZ5-u_h6lk8dGXJb1cWYW93I2nqkiQ4rrcZqREAnlTGms9pai-HVSHAMcjLuvXKmVp0wnxunpeIS2d4LdhD64F4yUE4q56oCA0pdrw1-nbZCa42EzvtOZezjHKH2JhlvtMXsTX4_nBn7QjHcTSTP7PgGIqmdkNT-C0kZO5wR0E4Led1yUQra6y6ajL3bDeMSpH0VHVy_iXPKEstKKTPWLJCzOKDlSFj9imbekjoWNGXGPhDG9j_813N99T_O9TV7yEmcE5Wbh-xgHDbuDbKr0byNC-kP58MiRA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | A cohort study of the perinatal outcome of radiofrequency ablation in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies based on a different needle insert angle |
URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03000605211018432 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2535036317 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2533314888 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8161873 https://doaj.org/article/24654458764445f983379faa952c6f16 |
Volume | 49 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3da9swED_a9GUvY5_MWxduMDoY9ZrIlm09jXQklMFKKCnLm5FlOQusdnHsh_wx-193549kKRvsxQZLsRzppDvd_fQ7gPdBlJIZohPXSBG4fur5rjbWuIq2QMqIQGnD552_XQdXt_7XpVweQdGfhel6cPOJYVX0Rc1izbObvdEXXZDxgiSTiUQk7144YYn4XFd3cevu7rNq8BOOT9d3HNo2DIjcuv3xtmM4EWEgxQBOJrOb74t-8SZ9JbvAA-djGckuEPrXRg9UWcP4f2CmPgRZ_oEUa5TX7Ak87qxOnLRi8hSObP4MzuYtbfX2HBf7U1ibczzD-Z7Qevscfk2Q8-iWFTZktFhkSGYjMkdyzt4fLOqKOtByQanTdZGVLUB7izppsXa4znGHXrcpUtcVtPCW7A022KMa8b60qzZf8AZZv6ZIP9XYZ3GpMCdlS_XWOYMIUOern_YF3M6miy9XbpfWwTV-MK5co8MoMBnZmpa2a6HRJEZppJIkSY02xpCMaLKSEjLsRJYpmwQqlckotDpSIiKT8SUM8iK3rwCVjZS1_lhFHqfOTuh12kitNVmFWZYqBz72IxTft-wd8bgnOH84nA5c8hjuKjLxdvOgKFdxN49jwfxzviQd4tMto4a9UGVaKylMkI0DB057CYh7WY6F9CQHzMehA-92xTSPOTijc1vUTR3Po71pFDkQHkjOwQcdluTrHw0jeMRpD0LPgQ8sY_uG__lfX_93zTfwSDCMp8F4nsKgKmv7luywKhnCcbgMh90Movvl9Hp-M2y8GnSdzka_AaqcNS4 |
linkProvider | SAGE Publications |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VcoAL4ilCCwwSFAk1aNeJk_jAoTxWW_pQD1upt-A4zrJSlVTZrND-GP4Av5IZJ9llK5C49BQpdhIn43nFn78BeB0lOYUhOvONFJEf5kHoa2ONrygFUkZEShve73xyGo3Pw68X8mILfvV7YbovOH_PsCoakTPWK-1mpqTAcYhITly4VonoAJVHdvmD0rX5h8PPJNs3Qoy-TD6N_a6igG_CaNj4RsdJZAoKcyxlCrHR9AZ5orIsy402xtDwNDnojGIKURTKZpHKZTaIrU6USChaofvegtshZW8uSB0NeqtPjk52KxZcyGUguxXUvw55wwe6UgEb8e11dOYfEDPn9Ub34V4XruJBO78ewJYtH8LeWct3vdzHyXr71nwf9_BszYS9fAQ_D5AL8NYNOhZbrAqkeBOZXLnk30ZYLRr68pYbap3PqqJukd1L1FkL0sNZiSvYu82RtKYii13zb2SDPRwSr2o7bQsNz5Edc450qca-_EuDJXlp6jcrGX2Aupxe2sdwfiPSewLbZVXap4DKJsracKiSgGtuZ3Q7baTWmsLJosiVB-96CaVXLe1HOuyZ0a-L04OPLMNVR2bsdieqepp2BiAVTFwXSnI-IR0KenAQq0JrJYWJimHkwW4_A9JeCVIhA8kr7cPYg1erZjIAvKqjS1stXJ8goKQ2STyIN2bOxoA2W8rZd0clnnC9hDjw4C3PsfWD__muz_6750u4M56cHKfHh6dHO3BXMBbIAUV3YbupF_Y5BXNN9sJpEcK3m1bb39JgWUw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6VVEJcEE9hKDBIUCRU02b93AOHQIlaClWEUtGbWa9300iVHTmOUH4Mf4HfyIwfCalA4tKTJe_aXnvenm9nAF6GcUZuiEpdHYjQ9TPPd5U22pUUAkktQqk073f-choenfmfzoPzLfjV7YVpv-D8LcOqaEW1smbpnmV2v80x7hNjch2RgIMX7lciWlDliVn-oJBt_u74kOj7Sojhx_GHI7ftKuBqP-xXrlZRHGpLro6haCHSit4ii2WapplWWmtaoiIjnZJfIayVJg1lFqQHkVGxFDF5LHTfG7Dt-xRU9mB7MPz6bdzpfjJ3QZu34HYuB0GbR_3rojcsYd0wYMPLvYrR_ANoVtu-4R243TqtOGi47C5smfwe7I6aqtfLPRyvN3HN93AXR-t62Mv78HOA3Ia3rLCuZYuFRfI6kUss5_zzCItFRd_f8ECpsmlhywbfvUSVNlA9nOa4Ar-bDEl2CtLbJf9M1tiBInFWmknTbniObJ4zpEsVdk1gKszJVtO8ac4YBFT55NI8gLNrod9D6OVFbh4BShNLY_y-jD3uvJ3S7ZQOlFLkVFqbSQfedBRKZk3xj6Tf1Ue_Sk4H3jMNVxO5bnd9oignSasGEsHl6_yATJBPB0sP9iJplZKB0KHthw7sdByQdKKQiMALON_ejxx4sRomNcC5HZWbYlHP8TwKbePYgWiDczYWtDmSTy_qguIxd02IPAdeM4-tH_zPd3383zOfw83R4TD5fHx68gRuCQYE1WjRHehV5cI8JY-uSp-1YoTw_bol9zcaJFvx |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+cohort+study+of+the+perinatal+outcome+of+radiofrequency+ablation+in+complicated+monochorionic+multiple+pregnancies+based+on+a+different+needle+insert+angle&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+international+medical+research&rft.au=Liu%2C+Qian&rft.au=Shi%2C+Xiaomei&rft.au=Fang%2C+Liyuan&rft.au=Rao%2C+Tengzi&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.issn=0300-0605&rft.eissn=1473-2300&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F03000605211018432&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_03000605211018432 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0300-0605&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0300-0605&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0300-0605&client=summon |