A cohort study of the perinatal outcome of radiofrequency ablation in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies based on a different needle insert angle

Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles. Methods We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of international medical research Vol. 49; no. 5; p. 3000605211018432
Main Authors Liu, Qian, Shi, Xiaomei, Fang, Liyuan, Rao, Tengzi, Shi, Lishuang, Wu, Jing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.05.2021
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles. Methods We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles. Results The RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery. Conclusion RFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA.
AbstractList To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles.OBJECTIVETo compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles.We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles.METHODSWe performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles.The RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery.RESULTSThe RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery.RFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA.CONCLUSIONRFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA.
Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles. Methods We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles. Results The RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery. Conclusion RFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA.
Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion angles. Methods We performed a historical cohort study of patients who underwent selective reduction using RFA through different needle insertion angles from 2015 to 2018 at a local hospital. Dorsal needle insertion cases were consecutively selected and abdominal needle insertion cases were selectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of fetal survival time with different needle insertion angles. Results The RFA procedure was performed in 28 women through an abdominal insertion angle and in 28 women through a dorsal insertion angle. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes between the two groups. The overall live birth rate after RFA in the two groups was 73.5% and the mean gestation was 31.6 ± 6.5 weeks. The Cox model showed that gestational age at RFA was a predictor of the duration of the period between RFA and delivery. Conclusion RFA conducted through the dorsal insertion angle is technically feasible for selective reduction in complex monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Gestational age at this procedure is an independent risk factor for the duration of pregnancy post-RFA.
Author Fang, Liyuan
Wu, Jing
Shi, Lishuang
Rao, Tengzi
Liu, Qian
Shi, Xiaomei
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Qian
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Qian
  organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xiaomei
  surname: Shi
  fullname: Shi, Xiaomei
  organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Liyuan
  surname: Fang
  fullname: Fang, Liyuan
  organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Tengzi
  surname: Rao
  fullname: Rao, Tengzi
  organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Lishuang
  surname: Shi
  fullname: Shi, Lishuang
  organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jing
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4213-4106
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Jing
  email: wujing020@126.com
  organization: Department of Medical Genetics Centre, Guangdong Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Guangzhou City, China
BookMark eNp1kkuLFDEUhQsZcR76A9wF3LjpMY-qJLURhsHHwIAbXYdbqZvuNFVJm6SE_jHzX03ZgzKKqws553ycXO5lcxZiwKZ5zeg1Y0q9o4JSKmnHGaNMt4I_ay5Yq8SGV-GsuVj1zWo4by5z3lPactnxF825aKnQnPYXzcMNsXEXUyG5LOORREfKDskBkw9QYCJxKTbOuAoJRh9dwu8LBnskMExQfAzEh8qYD5O3UHAkcwzRVmSVvCXzMhV_mCoy4TZAsB4zGSBXY40CGb1zmDAUEhDH6vMhY60DYTvhy-a5gynjq8d51Xz7-OHr7efN_ZdPd7c39xvbSlY2FpSW1lEmkWulLAxoR90PwzBasNaq3oLo1SAZ5c71OMh-7AaqEHTPNdXiqrk7cccIe3NIfoZ0NBG8-fUQ09ZAKt5OaHgru7bttJJtHa7XQqjeAfQdt9IxWVnvT6zDMsw42vq1BNMT6FMl-J3Zxh9GM8m0EhXw9hGQYl11Lmb22eI0QcC4ZMM7IQRrtV57v_nLuo9LCnVVq6ujQgqmqoudXDbFnBO632UYNeshmX8OqWauT5kMW_xD_X_gJ5Hly7k
Cites_doi 10.1159/000445291
10.1002/uog.22682
10.1002/uog.4046
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.009
10.1067/mob.2002.125242
10.1002/uog.14879
10.1002/uog.7567
10.1159/000355406
10.1002/uog.11122
10.1111/1471-0528.15253
10.1002/pd.5269
10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002
10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.043
10.1186/s12884-021-03656-1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2021
The Author(s) 2021 Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2021 2021 SAGE Publications
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2021
– notice: The Author(s) 2021 Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2021 2021 SAGE Publications
DBID AFRWT
AAYXX
CITATION
K9.
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1177/03000605211018432
DatabaseName Open Access Journals from Sage
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic


ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: AFRWT
  name: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
  url: http://journals.sagepub.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN 1473-2300
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_24654458764445f983379faa952c6f16
PMC8161873
10_1177_03000605211018432
10.1177_03000605211018432
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau of Guangdong Province
  grantid: 20211051
  funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100010883
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 20211051
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.GJ
01A
0R~
29K
2WC
44B
53G
54M
5GY
5RE
5VS
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AABQO
AACKU
AAFWJ
AAGGD
AAJIQ
AAJOX
AAJPV
AAJQC
AANSI
AAPEO
AAQQG
AAQXH
AASGM
AAXOT
AAYTG
AAZBJ
ABAFQ
ABAWP
ABDWY
ABHKI
ABJNI
ABNCE
ABPGX
ABQKF
ABQXT
ABUWG
ABVFX
ABXGC
ABYTW
ACARO
ACFMA
ACFYK
ACGBL
ACGFS
ACLHI
ACROE
ADBBV
ADEIA
ADMPF
ADOGD
ADQSQ
ADTBJ
ADUKL
AECVZ
AEFTW
AENEX
AERKM
AEUHG
AEWDL
AEXFG
AFCOW
AFKBI
AFKRA
AFKRG
AFPKN
AFRWT
AIGRN
AJABX
AJEFB
AJMMQ
AJSCY
AJUZI
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
AUTPY
AYAKG
BAWUL
BCNDV
BDDNI
BENPR
BPHCQ
BSEHC
BVXVI
CBRKF
CCPQU
CORYS
CQQTX
CUTAK
D-I
DC.
DF.
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EF0
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION
H13
HMCUK
HYE
J8X
K.F
KQ8
L7B
MK0
O9-
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
Q1R
ROL
RPM
S01
SAUOL
SCDPB
SCNPE
SFC
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
X7M
ZE2
ZGI
AAYXX
ACHEB
CITATION
OVT
K9.
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-ca786cf016e2877cabecd89bbbdcaccc79ca397b6102ff9eb69d5b07ea8928083
IEDL.DBID AFRWT
ISSN 0300-0605
1473-2300
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:27:28 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:59:39 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 10:39:05 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 09:16:50 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:28:57 EDT 2025
Sun Jun 22 05:40:20 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Radiofrequency ablation
multiple pregnancy
pregnancy outcome
needle insertion angle
risk factor
selective reduction
Language English
License Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c461t-ca786cf016e2877cabecd89bbbdcaccc79ca397b6102ff9eb69d5b07ea8928083
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-4213-4106
OpenAccessLink https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03000605211018432?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider
PMID 34038209
PQID 2535036317
PQPubID 4451107
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_24654458764445f983379faa952c6f16
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8161873
proquest_miscellaneous_2533314888
proquest_journals_2535036317
crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605211018432
sage_journals_10_1177_03000605211018432
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London, England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London, England
– name: London
– name: Sage UK: London, England
PublicationTitle Journal of international medical research
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher SAGE Publications
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: SAGE Publications
– name: Sage Publications Ltd
– name: SAGE Publishing
References Rahimi-Sharbaf, Ghaemi, Nassr 2021; 21
Yinon, Ashwal, Weisz 2015; 46
Lewi, Jani, Blickstein 2008; 199
Agha, Abdall-Razak, Crossley 2019; 72
Moise, Johnson, Moise 2008; 198
Roman, Papanna, Johnson 2010; 36
Peng, Xie, Lin 2016; 81
Ting, Poon, Tse 2020
Tsao, Feldstein, Albanese 2002; 187
Bebbington, Danzer, Moldenhauer 2012; 40
Lu, Ting, Law 2013; 34
Prefumo, Jauniaux 2018; 125
Cabassa, Fichera, Prefumo 2013; 166
Gratacos, Lewi, Munoz 2007; 30
Sun, Zou, Yang 2018; 38
bibr3-03000605211018432
bibr4-03000605211018432
bibr7-03000605211018432
bibr15-03000605211018432
bibr12-03000605211018432
bibr5-03000605211018432
bibr11-03000605211018432
bibr8-03000605211018432
bibr14-03000605211018432
Lewi L (bibr2-03000605211018432) 2008; 199
bibr6-03000605211018432
bibr10-03000605211018432
bibr1-03000605211018432
bibr13-03000605211018432
bibr9-03000605211018432
References_xml – volume: 198
  start-page: 191
  year: 2008
  end-page: 198
  article-title: Radiofrequency ablation for selective reduction in the complicated monochorionic gestation
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– year: 2020
  article-title: Outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction in complicated monochorionic pregnancies performed before 16 gestational weeks and thereafter
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 199
  year: 2008
  article-title: The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1163
  year: 2018
  article-title: Twin-to-twin-transfusion syndrome: from amniodrainage to laser.
  publication-title: BJOG
– volume: 40
  start-page: 319
  year: 2012
  end-page: 324
  article-title: Radiofrequency ablation vs bipolar umbilical cord coagulation in the management of complicated monochorionic pregnancies.
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 34
  start-page: 211
  year: 2013
  end-page: 216
  article-title: Radiofrequency Ablation for Selective Reduction in Complicated Monochorionic Multiple Pregnancies.
  publication-title: Fetal Diagn Ther
– volume: 187
  start-page: 635
  year: 2002
  end-page: 640
  article-title: Selective reduction of acardiac twin by radiofrequency ablation.
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 36
  start-page: 37
  year: 2010
  end-page: 41
  article-title: Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: radiofrequency ablation vs. bipolar cord coagulation
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 38
  start-page: 499
  year: 2018
  end-page: 503
  article-title: Risk factors for fetal death after radiofrequency ablation for complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies.
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
– volume: 21
  start-page: 189
  year: 2021
  article-title: . Radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction in complicated Monochorionic twins; comparing the outcomes according to the indications
  publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
– volume: 72
  start-page: 156
  year: 2019
  end-page: 165
  article-title: STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery.
  publication-title: Int J Surg
– volume: 81
  start-page: 552
  year: 2016
  end-page: 558
  article-title: Clinical Outcomes after Selective Fetal Reduction of Complicated Monochorionic Twins with Radiofrequency Ablation and Bipolar Cord Coagulation.
  publication-title: Gynecol Obstet Invest
– volume: 30
  start-page: 28
  year: 2007
  end-page: 34
  article-title: A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 46
  start-page: 670
  year: 2015
  end-page: 677
  article-title: Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic twins: prediction of obstetric outcome and comparison of techniques
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 166
  start-page: 127
  year: 2013
  end-page: 132
  article-title: The use of radiofrequency in the treatment of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a case series and review of the literature.
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
– ident: bibr11-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1159/000445291
– volume: 199
  year: 2008
  ident: bibr2-03000605211018432
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– ident: bibr9-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1002/uog.22682
– ident: bibr10-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1002/uog.4046
– ident: bibr6-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.009
– ident: bibr5-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125242
– ident: bibr12-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1002/uog.14879
– ident: bibr14-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1002/uog.7567
– ident: bibr15-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1159/000355406
– ident: bibr13-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1002/uog.11122
– ident: bibr1-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15253
– ident: bibr3-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1002/pd.5269
– ident: bibr7-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002
– ident: bibr8-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.043
– ident: bibr4-03000605211018432
  doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03656-1
SSID ssj0042652
Score 2.256637
Snippet Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle...
Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle...
To compare the pregnancy outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complicated multiple pregnancies between fetal abdominal and dorsal needle insertion...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
sage
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 3000605211018432
SubjectTerms Abdomen
Ablation
Cohort analysis
Gestational age
Pregnancy
Retrospective Clinical Research Report
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Na9wwEBUlp15KP6nbtEyhpFBiWsuWLR3T0hAKLTkkkJuRZCldKHLweg_7Y_JfOyPZu3Gg9NLTwkq7a-88ed5Yz28Ye1_LDmmINrkVvM6rrqxybZ3NFZZAyvJaaUvPO__4WZ9dVt-vxNWdVl-kCUv2wOmP-8TJ8KsSuGgrfPFKlmWjvNZKcFv7IpptY86bi6l0Dca0I_i0hxntlcpoPCKo2qEGJ3yRhaJZ_4Jh3tdH3hF5xbxz-pg9mggjnKQDfcIeuPCUHZ0nx-ntMVzsH6BaH8MRnO-9qLfP2O0JUAvcYYToIwu9B2R8QPbGgW7cQL8ZEXOOBgbdrXo_JG31FrRJMjlYBdgJz10HiNser5kD3ci1MAsS4WZw16nV7xooNXaAH9UwN2AZIWCexHmrQPv_oMP1b_ecXZ5-u_h6lk8dGXJb1cWYW93I2nqkiQ4rrcZqREAnlTGms9pai-HVSHAMcjLuvXKmVp0wnxunpeIS2d4LdhD64F4yUE4q56oCA0pdrw1-nbZCa42EzvtOZezjHKH2JhlvtMXsTX4_nBn7QjHcTSTP7PgGIqmdkNT-C0kZO5wR0E4Led1yUQra6y6ajL3bDeMSpH0VHVy_iXPKEstKKTPWLJCzOKDlSFj9imbekjoWNGXGPhDG9j_813N99T_O9TV7yEmcE5Wbh-xgHDbuDbKr0byNC-kP58MiRA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title A cohort study of the perinatal outcome of radiofrequency ablation in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies based on a different needle insert angle
URI https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03000605211018432
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2535036317
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2533314888
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8161873
https://doaj.org/article/24654458764445f983379faa952c6f16
Volume 49
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3da9swED_a9GUvY5_MWxduMDoY9ZrIlm09jXQklMFKKCnLm5FlOQusdnHsh_wx-193549kKRvsxQZLsRzppDvd_fQ7gPdBlJIZohPXSBG4fur5rjbWuIq2QMqIQGnD552_XQdXt_7XpVweQdGfhel6cPOJYVX0Rc1izbObvdEXXZDxgiSTiUQk7144YYn4XFd3cevu7rNq8BOOT9d3HNo2DIjcuv3xtmM4EWEgxQBOJrOb74t-8SZ9JbvAA-djGckuEPrXRg9UWcP4f2CmPgRZ_oEUa5TX7Ak87qxOnLRi8hSObP4MzuYtbfX2HBf7U1ibczzD-Z7Qevscfk2Q8-iWFTZktFhkSGYjMkdyzt4fLOqKOtByQanTdZGVLUB7izppsXa4znGHXrcpUtcVtPCW7A022KMa8b60qzZf8AZZv6ZIP9XYZ3GpMCdlS_XWOYMIUOern_YF3M6miy9XbpfWwTV-MK5co8MoMBnZmpa2a6HRJEZppJIkSY02xpCMaLKSEjLsRJYpmwQqlckotDpSIiKT8SUM8iK3rwCVjZS1_lhFHqfOTuh12kitNVmFWZYqBz72IxTft-wd8bgnOH84nA5c8hjuKjLxdvOgKFdxN49jwfxzviQd4tMto4a9UGVaKylMkI0DB057CYh7WY6F9CQHzMehA-92xTSPOTijc1vUTR3Po71pFDkQHkjOwQcdluTrHw0jeMRpD0LPgQ8sY_uG__lfX_93zTfwSDCMp8F4nsKgKmv7luywKhnCcbgMh90Movvl9Hp-M2y8GnSdzka_AaqcNS4
linkProvider SAGE Publications
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VcoAL4ilCCwwSFAk1aNeJk_jAoTxWW_pQD1upt-A4zrJSlVTZrND-GP4Av5IZJ9llK5C49BQpdhIn43nFn78BeB0lOYUhOvONFJEf5kHoa2ONrygFUkZEShve73xyGo3Pw68X8mILfvV7YbovOH_PsCoakTPWK-1mpqTAcYhITly4VonoAJVHdvmD0rX5h8PPJNs3Qoy-TD6N_a6igG_CaNj4RsdJZAoKcyxlCrHR9AZ5orIsy402xtDwNDnojGIKURTKZpHKZTaIrU6USChaofvegtshZW8uSB0NeqtPjk52KxZcyGUguxXUvw55wwe6UgEb8e11dOYfEDPn9Ub34V4XruJBO78ewJYtH8LeWct3vdzHyXr71nwf9_BszYS9fAQ_D5AL8NYNOhZbrAqkeBOZXLnk30ZYLRr68pYbap3PqqJukd1L1FkL0sNZiSvYu82RtKYii13zb2SDPRwSr2o7bQsNz5Edc450qca-_EuDJXlp6jcrGX2Aupxe2sdwfiPSewLbZVXap4DKJsracKiSgGtuZ3Q7baTWmsLJosiVB-96CaVXLe1HOuyZ0a-L04OPLMNVR2bsdieqepp2BiAVTFwXSnI-IR0KenAQq0JrJYWJimHkwW4_A9JeCVIhA8kr7cPYg1erZjIAvKqjS1stXJ8goKQ2STyIN2bOxoA2W8rZd0clnnC9hDjw4C3PsfWD__muz_6750u4M56cHKfHh6dHO3BXMBbIAUV3YbupF_Y5BXNN9sJpEcK3m1bb39JgWUw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6VVEJcEE9hKDBIUCRU02b93AOHQIlaClWEUtGbWa9300iVHTmOUH4Mf4HfyIwfCalA4tKTJe_aXnvenm9nAF6GcUZuiEpdHYjQ9TPPd5U22pUUAkktQqk073f-choenfmfzoPzLfjV7YVpv-D8LcOqaEW1smbpnmV2v80x7hNjch2RgIMX7lciWlDliVn-oJBt_u74kOj7Sojhx_GHI7ftKuBqP-xXrlZRHGpLro6haCHSit4ii2WapplWWmtaoiIjnZJfIayVJg1lFqQHkVGxFDF5LHTfG7Dt-xRU9mB7MPz6bdzpfjJ3QZu34HYuB0GbR_3rojcsYd0wYMPLvYrR_ANoVtu-4R243TqtOGi47C5smfwe7I6aqtfLPRyvN3HN93AXR-t62Mv78HOA3Ia3rLCuZYuFRfI6kUss5_zzCItFRd_f8ECpsmlhywbfvUSVNlA9nOa4Ar-bDEl2CtLbJf9M1tiBInFWmknTbniObJ4zpEsVdk1gKszJVtO8ac4YBFT55NI8gLNrod9D6OVFbh4BShNLY_y-jD3uvJ3S7ZQOlFLkVFqbSQfedBRKZk3xj6Tf1Ue_Sk4H3jMNVxO5bnd9oignSasGEsHl6_yATJBPB0sP9iJplZKB0KHthw7sdByQdKKQiMALON_ejxx4sRomNcC5HZWbYlHP8TwKbePYgWiDczYWtDmSTy_qguIxd02IPAdeM4-tH_zPd3383zOfw83R4TD5fHx68gRuCQYE1WjRHehV5cI8JY-uSp-1YoTw_bol9zcaJFvx
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+cohort+study+of+the+perinatal+outcome+of+radiofrequency+ablation+in+complicated+monochorionic+multiple+pregnancies+based+on+a+different+needle+insert+angle&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+international+medical+research&rft.au=Liu%2C+Qian&rft.au=Shi%2C+Xiaomei&rft.au=Fang%2C+Liyuan&rft.au=Rao%2C+Tengzi&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.issn=0300-0605&rft.eissn=1473-2300&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F03000605211018432&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_03000605211018432
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0300-0605&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0300-0605&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0300-0605&client=summon