The hidden dangers in routine medical complaints: uncovering patient harm

Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC health services research Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 957 - 13
Main Authors Luo, Shaoting, Chen, Xueting, Wen, Xinyu, Yao, Boyu, Wang, Cui, Li, Qingbin, Wang, Wei, Li, Lianyong, Zhang, Yong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 18.07.2025
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI.
AbstractList Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events.BACKGROUNDPatient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events.A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis.METHODSA retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis.The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results.RESULTSThe study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results.The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI.CONCLUSIONThe predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI.
Abstract Background Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors’ institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. Results The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers’ professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895–0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870–0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. Conclusion The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers’ professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI.
Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI.
BackgroundPatient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors’ institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis.ResultsThe study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers’ professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895–0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870–0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results.ConclusionThe predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers’ professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI.
Background Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. Results The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. Conclusion The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI. Keywords: Patient safety, Healthcare complaints, Predictive model, Hospital management, Quality of care
Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI.
ArticleNumber 957
Audience Academic
Author Luo, Shaoting
Li, Qingbin
Wang, Wei
Li, Lianyong
Wen, Xinyu
Chen, Xueting
Yao, Boyu
Wang, Cui
Zhang, Yong
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Shaoting
  surname: Luo
  fullname: Luo, Shaoting
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xueting
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Xueting
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Xinyu
  surname: Wen
  fullname: Wen, Xinyu
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Boyu
  surname: Yao
  fullname: Yao, Boyu
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Cui
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Cui
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Qingbin
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Qingbin
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Wei
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Wei
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Lianyong
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Lianyong
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Yong
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Yong
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40682066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkk2LHCEQhiVsyH4kfyCH0JBLLr2x1Lbt3JYlHwMLuWzO4mg549CtE-3Osv8-zs5m80EQtCieesui3nNyElNEQl4DvQRQ8n0BNgBvKeta4EC79u4ZOQPRs1YOkp_8EZ-S81J2lEKvWP-CnAoqFaNSnpHV7RabbXAOY-NM3GAuTYhNTsscIjYTumDN2Ng07UcT4lw-NEu06QfmEDfN3swB49xsTZ5ekufejAVfPb4X5Nunj7fXX9qbr59X11c3rRUS5nq7tfO-7z3nwKmyA2BNUMbWzFjOuDEcjBFdT5kHLpFSpJ10PdhOCU_5BVkddV0yO73PYTL5XicT9EMi5Y02eQ52RG3xUFKLB9EL7GBtmRUKB-7V0Dk4aL07au1z-r5gmfUUisVxNBHTUnT9DkihGBsq-vYfdJeWHOukB0oOg2RC_qY2pvYP0ac5G3sQ1VeqCinaKVapy_9Q9Ticgq1L9qHm_yp489h8WdeVPE39a48VYEfA5lRKRv-EANUHs-ijWXQ1i34wi77jPwFMRq4d
Cites_doi 10.3390/ijerph17103463
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013524
10.3390/jpm11111177
10.1001/jama.2011.929
10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450
10.1016/j.bja.2023.12.035
10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011593
10.1038/s41401-021-00627-2
10.1097/pts.0000000000000451
10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.038
10.1111/jgs.12169
10.1037/apl0000507
10.1080/13467581.2022.2074018
10.1186/s12874-020-01167-9
10.1097/pts.0000000000000782
10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.02.002
10.1186/s12879-020-05681-5
10.1056/NEJMp1605101
10.1016/j.artmed.2013.05.001
10.1097/hmr.0000000000000254
10.1186/s12931-024-02874-3
10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822
10.1007/s11606-020-05994-w
10.1136/bmj.l4185
10.1080/13814788.2021.1900109
10.1097/pts.0000000000000810
10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0643
10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437
10.1186/2110-5820-2-47
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.016
10.1093/intqhc/mzy215
10.1093/bja/aeq135
10.1080/16549716.2018.1458938
10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002651
10.1155/2017/3762651
10.1177/13558196211029323
10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755%
10.1057/s41599-024-03250-8
10.1186/s12910-021-00593-8
10.1017/s0033291720003815
10.1186/s12913-018-3339-8
10.1177/17474930211042485
10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010077
10.1136/qshc.2004.010033
10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9_8
10.1080/10872981.2022.2070940
10.1186/s13613-023-01159-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7RV
7WY
7WZ
7X7
7XB
87Z
88C
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8FL
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
DWQXO
FRNLG
FYUFA
F~G
GHDGH
K60
K6~
K9.
KB0
L.-
M0C
M0S
M0T
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12913-025-13105-w
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Collection
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
Health Research Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Global
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Healthcare Administration Database
Medical Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition)
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health Management
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic


Publicly Available Content Database

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
EISSN 1472-6963
EndPage 13
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ce584f56d9474e51bc2c48e93f895d10
A848280582
40682066
10_1186_s12913_025_13105_w
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: 2023 Applied Basic Research Program of Liaoning Province
  grantid: 2023JH2/101300022
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
44B
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7RV
7WY
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FL
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BEZIV
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FRNLG
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
K60
K6~
KQ8
M0C
M0T
M1P
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
K9.
L.-
M48
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c4dbdff77f331308c91ebdf022b2ac323aa31aa45702f136e00e056d71c584f03
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1472-6963
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:44 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 01:50:01 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 06 19:08:51 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 06 19:46:18 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 03:51:57 EDT 2025
Wed Jul 23 01:41:53 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 24 02:01:13 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Patient safety
Healthcare complaints
Quality of care
Hospital management
Predictive model
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c461t-c4dbdff77f331308c91ebdf022b2ac323aa31aa45702f136e00e056d71c584f03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/ce584f56d9474e51bc2c48e93f895d10
PMID 40682066
PQID 3236996246
PQPubID 44821
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ce584f56d9474e51bc2c48e93f895d10
proquest_miscellaneous_3231648229
proquest_journals_3236996246
gale_infotracmisc_A848280582
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A848280582
pubmed_primary_40682066
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_025_13105_w
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-07-18
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-07-18
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-07-18
  day: 18
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC health services research
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Health Serv Res
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References TW Reader (13105_CR40) 2014; 23
S Hempel (13105_CR39) 2013; 61
X-q Liu (13105_CR31) 2022; 43
JR Holland (13105_CR18) 2022; 27
YN Romanenko (13105_CR30) 2024; 11
JC Hurley (13105_CR25) 2023; 13
MJ Ottosen (13105_CR11) 2021; 17
M Leonard (13105_CR43) 2004; 13
TJ Bright (13105_CR46) 2012; 157
A RÅBerus (13105_CR41) 2019; 31
J Van Dael (13105_CR9) 2022; 27
RJ Stevens (13105_CR21) 2020; 118
N Jovanović (13105_CR38) 2022; 52
E Ammenwerth (13105_CR48) 2013; 59
K Wehkamp (13105_CR29) 2021; 22
RL Engle (13105_CR47) 2021; 46
CG Gunderson (13105_CR17) 2020; 29
M Van Beuzekom (13105_CR44) 2010; 105
TW Reader (13105_CR7) 2021; 106
Z Ahmed (13105_CR42) 2024; 13
JW Scott (13105_CR27) 2017; 161
R Phillips (13105_CR14) 2020; 20
I Unal (13105_CR22) 2017; 2017
M Panagioti (13105_CR26) 2017; 7
DA Wiegmann (13105_CR12) 2022; 18
E O’Dowd (13105_CR4) 2021; 27
J Bernhardt (13105_CR37) 2022; 17
T Mirzoev (13105_CR6) 2018; 11
A Gillespie (13105_CR8) 2021; 30
M Alsabri (13105_CR33) 2022; 18
A Pagnamenta (13105_CR28) 2012; 2
M Greenberg (13105_CR45) 2011; 306
13105_CR15
13105_CR16
M Zhang (13105_CR36) 2023; 22
J Gong (13105_CR32) 2020; 20
JM Weller (13105_CR34) 2024; 132
KA Smith (13105_CR49) 2020; 35
JH Lee (13105_CR20) 2022; 229
JZ Ayanian (13105_CR13) 2016; 375
A Joseph (13105_CR35) 2018; 37
M McCreaddie (13105_CR10) 2018; 18
13105_CR1
13105_CR23
D Huang (13105_CR19) 2024; 25
13105_CR24
13105_CR5
13105_CR2
13105_CR3
References_xml – ident: 13105_CR3
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103463
– volume: 7
  start-page: e013524
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: 13105_CR26
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013524
– ident: 13105_CR23
  doi: 10.3390/jpm11111177
– ident: 13105_CR2
– volume: 306
  start-page: 90
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 13105_CR45
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.929
– volume: 157
  start-page: 29
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 13105_CR46
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450
– volume: 132
  start-page: 771
  issue: 4
  year: 2024
  ident: 13105_CR34
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.12.035
– ident: 13105_CR16
  doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011593
– volume: 43
  start-page: 64
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 13105_CR31
  publication-title: Acta Pharmacol Sin
  doi: 10.1038/s41401-021-00627-2
– volume: 17
  start-page: e1145
  issue: 8
  year: 2021
  ident: 13105_CR11
  publication-title: J Patient Saf
  doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000451
– volume: 161
  start-page: 320
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 13105_CR27
  publication-title: Surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.038
– volume: 61
  start-page: 483
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 13105_CR39
  publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc
  doi: 10.1111/jgs.12169
– volume: 106
  start-page: 439
  issue: 3
  year: 2021
  ident: 13105_CR7
  publication-title: J Appl Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/apl0000507
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1146
  issue: 3
  year: 2023
  ident: 13105_CR36
  publication-title: J Asian Archit Building Eng
  doi: 10.1080/13467581.2022.2074018
– volume: 20
  start-page: 288
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 13105_CR14
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01167-9
– volume: 18
  start-page: e351
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 13105_CR33
  publication-title: J Patient Saf
  doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000782
– volume: 229
  start-page: 322
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 13105_CR20
  publication-title: J Econ
  doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.02.002
– volume: 20
  start-page: 963
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 13105_CR32
  publication-title: BMC Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05681-5
– volume: 375
  start-page: 205
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 13105_CR13
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605101
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 13105_CR48
  publication-title: Artif Intell Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.05.001
– volume: 46
  start-page: 174
  issue: 3
  year: 2021
  ident: 13105_CR47
  publication-title: Health Care Manage Rev
  doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000254
– volume: 25
  start-page: 246
  issue: 1
  year: 2024
  ident: 13105_CR19
  publication-title: Respir Res
  doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02874-3
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1008
  issue: 12
  year: 2020
  ident: 13105_CR17
  publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf
  doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822
– volume: 35
  start-page: 3007
  issue: 10
  year: 2020
  ident: 13105_CR49
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05994-w
– ident: 13105_CR24
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185
– volume: 27
  start-page: 35
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 13105_CR4
  publication-title: Eur J Gen Pract
  doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1900109
– volume: 18
  start-page: 119
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 13105_CR12
  publication-title: J Patient Saf
  doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000810
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1884
  issue: 11
  year: 2018
  ident: 13105_CR35
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0643
– volume: 23
  start-page: 678
  issue: 8
  year: 2014
  ident: 13105_CR40
  publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf
  doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437
– volume: 2
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 13105_CR28
  publication-title: Ann Intensiv Care
  doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-47
– volume: 118
  start-page: 93
  year: 2020
  ident: 13105_CR21
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.016
– volume: 31
  start-page: 556
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 13105_CR41
  publication-title: Int J Qual Health Care
  doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy215
– volume: 105
  start-page: 52
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 13105_CR44
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq135
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1458938
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 13105_CR6
  publication-title: Glob Health Action
  doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1458938
– volume: 13
  start-page: e002651
  issue: Suppl 2
  year: 2024
  ident: 13105_CR42
  publication-title: J BMJ Open Quality.
  doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002651
– volume: 2017
  start-page: 3762651
  year: 2017
  ident: 13105_CR22
  publication-title: Comput Math Methods Med
  doi: 10.1155/2017/3762651
– ident: 13105_CR1
– volume: 27
  start-page: 41
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 13105_CR9
  publication-title: J Health Serv Res Policy
  doi: 10.1177/13558196211029323
– ident: 13105_CR15
  doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755%
– volume: 11
  start-page: 931
  issue: 1
  year: 2024
  ident: 13105_CR30
  publication-title: Humanit Social Sci Commun
  doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03250-8
– volume: 22
  start-page: 26
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 13105_CR29
  publication-title: BMC Med Ethics
  doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00593-8
– volume: 52
  start-page: 1969
  issue: 10
  year: 2022
  ident: 13105_CR38
  publication-title: Psychol Med
  doi: 10.1017/s0033291720003815
– volume: 18
  start-page: 551
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 13105_CR10
  publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3339-8
– volume: 17
  start-page: 370
  issue: 4
  year: 2022
  ident: 13105_CR37
  publication-title: Int J Stroke: Official J Int Stroke Soc
  doi: 10.1177/17474930211042485
– volume: 30
  start-page: 484
  issue: 6
  year: 2021
  ident: 13105_CR8
  publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf
  doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010077
– volume: 13
  start-page: i85
  issue: suppl 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 13105_CR43
  publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf
  doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010033
– ident: 13105_CR5
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9_8
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2070940
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 13105_CR18
  publication-title: Med Educ Online
  doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2070940
– volume: 13
  start-page: 62
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 13105_CR25
  publication-title: Ann Intensiv Care
  doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01159-0
SSID ssj0017827
Score 2.4281607
Snippet Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents...
Background Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these...
BackgroundPatient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these...
Abstract Background Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 957
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Chronic illnesses
Complaints
Consumer complaints
Disease
Female
Gender
Health care
Healthcare complaints
Hospital management
Hospitals
Humans
Iatrogenic diseases
Intensive care
Interdisciplinary aspects
Logistic Models
Male
Medical care
Medical errors
Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Narratives
Nomograms
Patient Harm - statistics & numerical data
Patient Safety
Patient satisfaction
Physicians
Predictive model
Quality management
Quality of care
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
Self evaluation
Variables
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Nb9UwDI9gXJDQxPjsGChISBxQtXw1SbmgMTENDpyY9G5RkiawA-322mn__uy076EHEpcekrRKbSe2E_tnQt5x2YlOeFYLDy6K8pnVIRqM3NFZS2YT8yVA9rs-v1DfVs1qOXAbl7DKzZ5YNupuiHhGfiyF1GCbC6U_XV3XWDUKb1eXEhr3yQOELsOQLrPaOlwctJ_ZJMpYfTyCbsNaBqKpOVg1TX27o4wKZv-_O_Nf9mbRO2ePyf5iMNKTmcMH5F7qn5BH82kbnZOInpKvwG36C9FAetqVTN6RXvZ0PYBY9Yn-nm9jaIkf95f9NH6koM8wehM0F12wVSmiWD8jF2dffpye10uRhDoqzSd4dqHL2ZgsJegjG1ueoAFUcxA-AtW8l9x71RgmMpc6MZbA6OkMj2B7ZCafk71-6NNLQj0LnmuTg8pGBSFa3zEfrERQMA_UrMiHDbXc1YyF4YoPYbWbaeuAtq7Q1t1W5DMSdDsScaxLw7D-6ZZl4WLCScB0WmVUaniIIiqbWplt23ScVeQ9ssPhapvWPvolaQAmjLhV7sQqcBlZY0VFjnZGwiqJu90bhrpllY7uj0xV5O22G9_EyLM-DTdlDHiUCItfkRezIGx_CYyhAod_-P-PvyIPBQodwnHaI7I3rW_SazBlpvCmyOsdJvLvcg
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title The hidden dangers in routine medical complaints: uncovering patient harm
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40682066
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3236996246
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3231648229
https://doaj.org/article/ce584f56d9474e51bc2c48e93f895d10
Volume 25
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwEB1BuSAhRPkMtCsjIXFAUR3bsR1u3apVy6FCFZVWXCzbsUUPzaLdVP37jO3sioUDFy45OI7kvLHzZuKZZ4APDe9ZzyytmcUQRdhIa-dVytyRUXKqA7U5QfZSnl-LL4t28dtRXyknrMgDF-COfECKjK3sO6FEaBvnmRc6dDzqru1LcRVy3iaYmvYPkPfUpkRGy6M1slo6xYC1dYP-TFvf79BQVuv_-5v8h6eZGefsGTydXEVyXIa4Dw_C8ByelP9spJQPvYALtDP5kXRABtLnGt41uRnIaokTagjktuzDkJw5bm-Gcf2ZIJOlvE3kLDKpqpKkX_0Srs9Ov52c19PxCLUXshnx2rs-RqUi58hE2ndNwAYkZces54xbyxtrRasoiw2XgdKA7k6vGp8gpfwV7A3LIbwBYqmzjVTRiaiEY6yzPbVO8yQHZhHNCj5t0DI_iwqGydGDlqZgaxBbk7E19xXME6DbnknBOjegXc1kV_Mvu1bwMZnDpHU2rqy3U7kADjgpVpljLTBYpK1mFRzs9MT14XdvbwxqpvW5NoiOxEiPCVnB--3t9GTKORvC8i73wVgyCeJX8LpMhO0roRuUhfDf_o9XfQePWZqaSa5TH8DeuLoLh-jqjG4GD9VCzeDR_PTy69Usz3G8Xs2__wKxiftV
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7QEkhHgTKGAkEAcU1bGdFxJCLbTapWWFUCv1ZhzHaXsgKZtUK_4Uv5EZJ1m0IHHrJYfESZzx2N9MPPMNwMtIlqIUhofCoIuiTMXDwqYUuZNUieSZ48YHyM6T6bH6dBKfbMCvMReGwirHNdEv1GVj6R_5thQyQdtcqOT9xY-QqkbR7upYQqNXiwP3c4kuW_tu9hHH95UQ-3tHH6bhUFUgtCqJOjyWRVlVaVpJiQt4ZvPI4QnEskIYi68xRkbGqDjloopk4jh3aCWUaWQRrCsu8bnXYFNJdGUmsLm7N__ydbVvgXibjqk5WbLdIppS9QQRhxHaUXG4XIM_XyXgXyz4y8L1SLd_G24NJirb6XXqDmy4-i7c7P_vsT5t6R7MUL_YGfGP1Kz0ucMtO6_ZokFFrh373u__MB-xbs7rrn3LEEEpXhSxkg1srox4s-_D8ZUI8AFM6qZ2j4AZXpgoSatCVakqhMhNyU2RSaIhMyjNAN6M0tIXPfuG9l5Lluhethplq71s9TKAXRLoqiUxZ_sTzeJUDxNRW0edwO7kKlUujgorrMpcLqssj8uIB_CahkPT_O4WxpohTQE7TExZeidT6KTyOBMBbK21xHlp1y-PA6qHdaHVf7Q4gBery3QnxbrVrrn0bdCHJSL-AB72irD6JDS_PAH_4_8__Dlcnx59PtSHs_nBE7ghSAGJDDTbgkm3uHRP0ZDqimeD9jL4dtUT5jeteS2O
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+hidden+dangers+in+routine+medical+complaints%3A+uncovering+patient+harm&rft.jtitle=BMC+health+services+research&rft.au=Luo%2C+Shaoting&rft.au=Chen%2C+Xueting&rft.au=Wen%2C+Xinyu&rft.au=Yao%2C+Boyu&rft.date=2025-07-18&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12913-025-13105-w&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40682066&rft.externalDocID=40682066
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon