The hidden dangers in routine medical complaints: uncovering patient harm
Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events....
Saved in:
Published in | BMC health services research Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 957 - 13 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
18.07.2025
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events.
A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis.
The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results.
The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events.BACKGROUNDPatient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events.A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis.METHODSA retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis.The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results.RESULTSThe study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results.The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI.CONCLUSIONThe predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI. Abstract Background Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors’ institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. Results The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers’ professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895–0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870–0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. Conclusion The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers’ professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI. Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI. BackgroundPatient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors’ institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis.ResultsThe study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers’ professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895–0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870–0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results.ConclusionThe predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers’ professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI. Background Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. Results The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. Conclusion The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI. Keywords: Patient safety, Healthcare complaints, Predictive model, Hospital management, Quality of care Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model to distinguish the genuine PHI from medical complaints and non-harmful events. A retrospective study was conducted using data collected from January 2014 to December 2023, encompassing patient interactions, treatments, and complaints in the authors' institution. Variables considered included demographic details, clinical factors, and complaint characteristics. The predictive model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and validated via a split-sample method. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis. The study included 987 medical complaints, of which 361 involved PHI. Using LASSO and logistic regression analyses, the model identified key predictors of PHI including the choice of treatment methods, healthcare providers' professional behavior, and the nature of the complaints. The model achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.895-0.939) in the training set and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.870-0.938) in the test set. Model performance was further supported by calibration and decision curve analysis results. The predictive model shows promise in identifying PHI from service complaints within our hospital. Key predictors, such as treatment decisions and healthcare providers' professional conduct, appear to play a notable role in patient safety. By utilizing this model, healthcare facilities may enhance their ability to identify and address factors that could contribute to PHI. |
ArticleNumber | 957 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Luo, Shaoting Li, Qingbin Wang, Wei Li, Lianyong Wen, Xinyu Chen, Xueting Yao, Boyu Wang, Cui Zhang, Yong |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Shaoting surname: Luo fullname: Luo, Shaoting – sequence: 2 givenname: Xueting surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Xueting – sequence: 3 givenname: Xinyu surname: Wen fullname: Wen, Xinyu – sequence: 4 givenname: Boyu surname: Yao fullname: Yao, Boyu – sequence: 5 givenname: Cui surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Cui – sequence: 6 givenname: Qingbin surname: Li fullname: Li, Qingbin – sequence: 7 givenname: Wei surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Wei – sequence: 8 givenname: Lianyong surname: Li fullname: Li, Lianyong – sequence: 9 givenname: Yong surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Yong |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40682066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkk2LHCEQhiVsyH4kfyCH0JBLLr2x1Lbt3JYlHwMLuWzO4mg549CtE-3Osv8-zs5m80EQtCieesui3nNyElNEQl4DvQRQ8n0BNgBvKeta4EC79u4ZOQPRs1YOkp_8EZ-S81J2lEKvWP-CnAoqFaNSnpHV7RabbXAOY-NM3GAuTYhNTsscIjYTumDN2Ng07UcT4lw-NEu06QfmEDfN3swB49xsTZ5ekufejAVfPb4X5Nunj7fXX9qbr59X11c3rRUS5nq7tfO-7z3nwKmyA2BNUMbWzFjOuDEcjBFdT5kHLpFSpJ10PdhOCU_5BVkddV0yO73PYTL5XicT9EMi5Y02eQ52RG3xUFKLB9EL7GBtmRUKB-7V0Dk4aL07au1z-r5gmfUUisVxNBHTUnT9DkihGBsq-vYfdJeWHOukB0oOg2RC_qY2pvYP0ac5G3sQ1VeqCinaKVapy_9Q9Ticgq1L9qHm_yp489h8WdeVPE39a48VYEfA5lRKRv-EANUHs-ijWXQ1i34wi77jPwFMRq4d |
Cites_doi | 10.3390/ijerph17103463 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013524 10.3390/jpm11111177 10.1001/jama.2011.929 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450 10.1016/j.bja.2023.12.035 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011593 10.1038/s41401-021-00627-2 10.1097/pts.0000000000000451 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.038 10.1111/jgs.12169 10.1037/apl0000507 10.1080/13467581.2022.2074018 10.1186/s12874-020-01167-9 10.1097/pts.0000000000000782 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.02.002 10.1186/s12879-020-05681-5 10.1056/NEJMp1605101 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.05.001 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000254 10.1186/s12931-024-02874-3 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822 10.1007/s11606-020-05994-w 10.1136/bmj.l4185 10.1080/13814788.2021.1900109 10.1097/pts.0000000000000810 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0643 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437 10.1186/2110-5820-2-47 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.016 10.1093/intqhc/mzy215 10.1093/bja/aeq135 10.1080/16549716.2018.1458938 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002651 10.1155/2017/3762651 10.1177/13558196211029323 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755% 10.1057/s41599-024-03250-8 10.1186/s12910-021-00593-8 10.1017/s0033291720003815 10.1186/s12913-018-3339-8 10.1177/17474930211042485 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010077 10.1136/qshc.2004.010033 10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9_8 10.1080/10872981.2022.2070940 10.1186/s13613-023-01159-0 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7RV 7WY 7WZ 7X7 7XB 87Z 88C 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8FL ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BEZIV CCPQU DWQXO FRNLG FYUFA F~G GHDGH K60 K6~ K9. KB0 L.- M0C M0S M0T M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQBIZ PQBZA PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U 7X8 DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-025-13105-w |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Business Premium Collection (Alumni) Health Research Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Global ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition) Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) Business Premium Collection (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Public Health |
EISSN | 1472-6963 |
EndPage | 13 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ce584f56d9474e51bc2c48e93f895d10 A848280582 40682066 10_1186_s12913_025_13105_w |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: 2023 Applied Basic Research Program of Liaoning Province grantid: 2023JH2/101300022 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 44B 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7WY 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FL AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BEZIV BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FRNLG FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR INH INR ITC K60 K6~ KQ8 M0C M0T M1P M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC K9. L.- M48 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c4dbdff77f331308c91ebdf022b2ac323aa31aa45702f136e00e056d71c584f03 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1472-6963 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:44 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 01:50:01 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 06 19:08:51 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 06 19:46:18 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 03:51:57 EDT 2025 Wed Jul 23 01:41:53 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 24 02:01:13 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Patient safety Healthcare complaints Quality of care Hospital management Predictive model |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c461t-c4dbdff77f331308c91ebdf022b2ac323aa31aa45702f136e00e056d71c584f03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/ce584f56d9474e51bc2c48e93f895d10 |
PMID | 40682066 |
PQID | 3236996246 |
PQPubID | 44821 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ce584f56d9474e51bc2c48e93f895d10 proquest_miscellaneous_3231648229 proquest_journals_3236996246 gale_infotracmisc_A848280582 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A848280582 pubmed_primary_40682066 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_025_13105_w |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-07-18 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-07-18 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2025 text: 2025-07-18 day: 18 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC health services research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Health Serv Res |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | TW Reader (13105_CR40) 2014; 23 S Hempel (13105_CR39) 2013; 61 X-q Liu (13105_CR31) 2022; 43 JR Holland (13105_CR18) 2022; 27 YN Romanenko (13105_CR30) 2024; 11 JC Hurley (13105_CR25) 2023; 13 MJ Ottosen (13105_CR11) 2021; 17 M Leonard (13105_CR43) 2004; 13 TJ Bright (13105_CR46) 2012; 157 A RÅBerus (13105_CR41) 2019; 31 J Van Dael (13105_CR9) 2022; 27 RJ Stevens (13105_CR21) 2020; 118 N Jovanović (13105_CR38) 2022; 52 E Ammenwerth (13105_CR48) 2013; 59 K Wehkamp (13105_CR29) 2021; 22 RL Engle (13105_CR47) 2021; 46 CG Gunderson (13105_CR17) 2020; 29 M Van Beuzekom (13105_CR44) 2010; 105 TW Reader (13105_CR7) 2021; 106 Z Ahmed (13105_CR42) 2024; 13 JW Scott (13105_CR27) 2017; 161 R Phillips (13105_CR14) 2020; 20 I Unal (13105_CR22) 2017; 2017 M Panagioti (13105_CR26) 2017; 7 DA Wiegmann (13105_CR12) 2022; 18 E O’Dowd (13105_CR4) 2021; 27 J Bernhardt (13105_CR37) 2022; 17 T Mirzoev (13105_CR6) 2018; 11 A Gillespie (13105_CR8) 2021; 30 M Alsabri (13105_CR33) 2022; 18 A Pagnamenta (13105_CR28) 2012; 2 M Greenberg (13105_CR45) 2011; 306 13105_CR15 13105_CR16 M Zhang (13105_CR36) 2023; 22 J Gong (13105_CR32) 2020; 20 JM Weller (13105_CR34) 2024; 132 KA Smith (13105_CR49) 2020; 35 JH Lee (13105_CR20) 2022; 229 JZ Ayanian (13105_CR13) 2016; 375 A Joseph (13105_CR35) 2018; 37 M McCreaddie (13105_CR10) 2018; 18 13105_CR1 13105_CR23 D Huang (13105_CR19) 2024; 25 13105_CR24 13105_CR5 13105_CR2 13105_CR3 |
References_xml | – ident: 13105_CR3 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103463 – volume: 7 start-page: e013524 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 13105_CR26 publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013524 – ident: 13105_CR23 doi: 10.3390/jpm11111177 – ident: 13105_CR2 – volume: 306 start-page: 90 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 13105_CR45 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.929 – volume: 157 start-page: 29 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 13105_CR46 publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450 – volume: 132 start-page: 771 issue: 4 year: 2024 ident: 13105_CR34 publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.12.035 – ident: 13105_CR16 doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011593 – volume: 43 start-page: 64 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 13105_CR31 publication-title: Acta Pharmacol Sin doi: 10.1038/s41401-021-00627-2 – volume: 17 start-page: e1145 issue: 8 year: 2021 ident: 13105_CR11 publication-title: J Patient Saf doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000451 – volume: 161 start-page: 320 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 13105_CR27 publication-title: Surgery doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.038 – volume: 61 start-page: 483 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 13105_CR39 publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc doi: 10.1111/jgs.12169 – volume: 106 start-page: 439 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 13105_CR7 publication-title: J Appl Psychol doi: 10.1037/apl0000507 – volume: 22 start-page: 1146 issue: 3 year: 2023 ident: 13105_CR36 publication-title: J Asian Archit Building Eng doi: 10.1080/13467581.2022.2074018 – volume: 20 start-page: 288 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 13105_CR14 publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01167-9 – volume: 18 start-page: e351 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 13105_CR33 publication-title: J Patient Saf doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000782 – volume: 229 start-page: 322 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 13105_CR20 publication-title: J Econ doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.02.002 – volume: 20 start-page: 963 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 13105_CR32 publication-title: BMC Infect Dis doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05681-5 – volume: 375 start-page: 205 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 13105_CR13 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605101 – volume: 59 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 13105_CR48 publication-title: Artif Intell Med doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.05.001 – volume: 46 start-page: 174 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 13105_CR47 publication-title: Health Care Manage Rev doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000254 – volume: 25 start-page: 246 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 13105_CR19 publication-title: Respir Res doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02874-3 – volume: 29 start-page: 1008 issue: 12 year: 2020 ident: 13105_CR17 publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822 – volume: 35 start-page: 3007 issue: 10 year: 2020 ident: 13105_CR49 publication-title: J Gen Intern Med doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05994-w – ident: 13105_CR24 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185 – volume: 27 start-page: 35 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 13105_CR4 publication-title: Eur J Gen Pract doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1900109 – volume: 18 start-page: 119 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 13105_CR12 publication-title: J Patient Saf doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000810 – volume: 37 start-page: 1884 issue: 11 year: 2018 ident: 13105_CR35 publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0643 – volume: 23 start-page: 678 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 13105_CR40 publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437 – volume: 2 start-page: 47 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 13105_CR28 publication-title: Ann Intensiv Care doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-47 – volume: 118 start-page: 93 year: 2020 ident: 13105_CR21 publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.016 – volume: 31 start-page: 556 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 13105_CR41 publication-title: Int J Qual Health Care doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy215 – volume: 105 start-page: 52 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 13105_CR44 publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq135 – volume: 11 start-page: 1458938 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 13105_CR6 publication-title: Glob Health Action doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1458938 – volume: 13 start-page: e002651 issue: Suppl 2 year: 2024 ident: 13105_CR42 publication-title: J BMJ Open Quality. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002651 – volume: 2017 start-page: 3762651 year: 2017 ident: 13105_CR22 publication-title: Comput Math Methods Med doi: 10.1155/2017/3762651 – ident: 13105_CR1 – volume: 27 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 13105_CR9 publication-title: J Health Serv Res Policy doi: 10.1177/13558196211029323 – ident: 13105_CR15 doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755% – volume: 11 start-page: 931 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 13105_CR30 publication-title: Humanit Social Sci Commun doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03250-8 – volume: 22 start-page: 26 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 13105_CR29 publication-title: BMC Med Ethics doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00593-8 – volume: 52 start-page: 1969 issue: 10 year: 2022 ident: 13105_CR38 publication-title: Psychol Med doi: 10.1017/s0033291720003815 – volume: 18 start-page: 551 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 13105_CR10 publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3339-8 – volume: 17 start-page: 370 issue: 4 year: 2022 ident: 13105_CR37 publication-title: Int J Stroke: Official J Int Stroke Soc doi: 10.1177/17474930211042485 – volume: 30 start-page: 484 issue: 6 year: 2021 ident: 13105_CR8 publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010077 – volume: 13 start-page: i85 issue: suppl 1 year: 2004 ident: 13105_CR43 publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010033 – ident: 13105_CR5 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9_8 – volume: 27 start-page: 2070940 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 13105_CR18 publication-title: Med Educ Online doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2070940 – volume: 13 start-page: 62 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 13105_CR25 publication-title: Ann Intensiv Care doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01159-0 |
SSID | ssj0017827 |
Score | 2.4281607 |
Snippet | Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these incidents... Background Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these... BackgroundPatient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing these... Abstract Background Patient harm incidents (PHI) significantly impact healthcare quality and outcomes. Despite technological advances, predicting and managing... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 957 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Chronic illnesses Complaints Consumer complaints Disease Female Gender Health care Healthcare complaints Hospital management Hospitals Humans Iatrogenic diseases Intensive care Interdisciplinary aspects Logistic Models Male Medical care Medical errors Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Narratives Nomograms Patient Harm - statistics & numerical data Patient Safety Patient satisfaction Physicians Predictive model Quality management Quality of care Retrospective Studies ROC Curve Self evaluation Variables |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Nb9UwDI9gXJDQxPjsGChISBxQtXw1SbmgMTENDpyY9G5RkiawA-322mn__uy076EHEpcekrRKbSe2E_tnQt5x2YlOeFYLDy6K8pnVIRqM3NFZS2YT8yVA9rs-v1DfVs1qOXAbl7DKzZ5YNupuiHhGfiyF1GCbC6U_XV3XWDUKb1eXEhr3yQOELsOQLrPaOlwctJ_ZJMpYfTyCbsNaBqKpOVg1TX27o4wKZv-_O_Nf9mbRO2ePyf5iMNKTmcMH5F7qn5BH82kbnZOInpKvwG36C9FAetqVTN6RXvZ0PYBY9Yn-nm9jaIkf95f9NH6koM8wehM0F12wVSmiWD8jF2dffpye10uRhDoqzSd4dqHL2ZgsJegjG1ueoAFUcxA-AtW8l9x71RgmMpc6MZbA6OkMj2B7ZCafk71-6NNLQj0LnmuTg8pGBSFa3zEfrERQMA_UrMiHDbXc1YyF4YoPYbWbaeuAtq7Q1t1W5DMSdDsScaxLw7D-6ZZl4WLCScB0WmVUaniIIiqbWplt23ScVeQ9ssPhapvWPvolaQAmjLhV7sQqcBlZY0VFjnZGwiqJu90bhrpllY7uj0xV5O22G9_EyLM-DTdlDHiUCItfkRezIGx_CYyhAod_-P-PvyIPBQodwnHaI7I3rW_SazBlpvCmyOsdJvLvcg priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | The hidden dangers in routine medical complaints: uncovering patient harm |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40682066 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3236996246 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3231648229 https://doaj.org/article/ce584f56d9474e51bc2c48e93f895d10 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwEB1BuSAhRPkMtCsjIXFAUR3bsR1u3apVy6FCFZVWXCzbsUUPzaLdVP37jO3sioUDFy45OI7kvLHzZuKZZ4APDe9ZzyytmcUQRdhIa-dVytyRUXKqA7U5QfZSnl-LL4t28dtRXyknrMgDF-COfECKjK3sO6FEaBvnmRc6dDzqru1LcRVy3iaYmvYPkPfUpkRGy6M1slo6xYC1dYP-TFvf79BQVuv_-5v8h6eZGefsGTydXEVyXIa4Dw_C8ByelP9spJQPvYALtDP5kXRABtLnGt41uRnIaokTagjktuzDkJw5bm-Gcf2ZIJOlvE3kLDKpqpKkX_0Srs9Ov52c19PxCLUXshnx2rs-RqUi58hE2ndNwAYkZces54xbyxtrRasoiw2XgdKA7k6vGp8gpfwV7A3LIbwBYqmzjVTRiaiEY6yzPbVO8yQHZhHNCj5t0DI_iwqGydGDlqZgaxBbk7E19xXME6DbnknBOjegXc1kV_Mvu1bwMZnDpHU2rqy3U7kADjgpVpljLTBYpK1mFRzs9MT14XdvbwxqpvW5NoiOxEiPCVnB--3t9GTKORvC8i73wVgyCeJX8LpMhO0roRuUhfDf_o9XfQePWZqaSa5TH8DeuLoLh-jqjG4GD9VCzeDR_PTy69Usz3G8Xs2__wKxiftV |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7QEkhHgTKGAkEAcU1bGdFxJCLbTapWWFUCv1ZhzHaXsgKZtUK_4Uv5EZJ1m0IHHrJYfESZzx2N9MPPMNwMtIlqIUhofCoIuiTMXDwqYUuZNUieSZ48YHyM6T6bH6dBKfbMCvMReGwirHNdEv1GVj6R_5thQyQdtcqOT9xY-QqkbR7upYQqNXiwP3c4kuW_tu9hHH95UQ-3tHH6bhUFUgtCqJOjyWRVlVaVpJiQt4ZvPI4QnEskIYi68xRkbGqDjloopk4jh3aCWUaWQRrCsu8bnXYFNJdGUmsLm7N__ydbVvgXibjqk5WbLdIppS9QQRhxHaUXG4XIM_XyXgXyz4y8L1SLd_G24NJirb6XXqDmy4-i7c7P_vsT5t6R7MUL_YGfGP1Kz0ucMtO6_ZokFFrh373u__MB-xbs7rrn3LEEEpXhSxkg1srox4s-_D8ZUI8AFM6qZ2j4AZXpgoSatCVakqhMhNyU2RSaIhMyjNAN6M0tIXPfuG9l5Lluhethplq71s9TKAXRLoqiUxZ_sTzeJUDxNRW0edwO7kKlUujgorrMpcLqssj8uIB_CahkPT_O4WxpohTQE7TExZeidT6KTyOBMBbK21xHlp1y-PA6qHdaHVf7Q4gBery3QnxbrVrrn0bdCHJSL-AB72irD6JDS_PAH_4_8__Dlcnx59PtSHs_nBE7ghSAGJDDTbgkm3uHRP0ZDqimeD9jL4dtUT5jeteS2O |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+hidden+dangers+in+routine+medical+complaints%3A+uncovering+patient+harm&rft.jtitle=BMC+health+services+research&rft.au=Luo%2C+Shaoting&rft.au=Chen%2C+Xueting&rft.au=Wen%2C+Xinyu&rft.au=Yao%2C+Boyu&rft.date=2025-07-18&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12913-025-13105-w&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40682066&rft.externalDocID=40682066 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |