Mangrove biomass carbon stock mapping of the Karimunjawa Islands using multispectral remote sensing
Among vegetated coastal habitats, mangrove forests are among the densest carbon pools. They store their organic carbon in the surrounding soil and thus the sequestered carbon stays in the sediment for a long time and cannot be easily returned to the atmosphere. Additionally, mangroves also provide v...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of remote sensing Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 26 - 52 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Taylor & Francis
02.01.2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Among vegetated coastal habitats, mangrove forests are among the densest carbon pools. They store their organic carbon in the surrounding soil and thus the sequestered carbon stays in the sediment for a long time and cannot be easily returned to the atmosphere. Additionally, mangroves also provide various important ecosystem services in coastal areas and surroundings. Accordingly, it is important to understand the distribution of biomass carbon stock in mangrove habitats in a spatial and temporal context, not only to reduce CO ₂ concentrations in the atmosphere, but also for their sustainability. The objectives of this research are to map the mangrove carbon stock and estimate the total biomass carbon stock sheltered by mangrove forests, with the Karimunjawa Islands as a study site, using the widely available passive remote sensing system ALOS AVNIR-2. The modelling and mapping of mangrove carbon stock incorporates the integration of image pixel values and mangroves field data via empirical modelling. Vegetation indices and PC bands at different levels of radiometric corrections were all used as the input in the mangrove carbon stock modelling so that the effectiveness and sensitivity of different image transformations to particular radiometric correction levels could be analysed and understood. Afterward, the accuracy and effectiveness of each mangrove carbon stock-mapping routine was compared and evaluated. The accuracy of the best mangrove above-ground carbon stock (AGC) map modelled from vegetation index is 77.1% (EVI1, SE 5.89 kg C m ⁻²), and for mangrove below-ground carbon stock (BGC) it is 60.0% (GEMI, SE 2.54 kg C m ⁻²). The mangrove carbon stock map from ALOS AVNIR-2 PC bands showed a maximum accuracy of 77.8% (PC2, SE 5.71 kg C m ⁻²) and 60.8% (PC2, SE 2.48 kg C m ⁻²) for AGC and BGC respectively. From the resulting maps, the Karimunjawa Islands are estimated to shelter 96,482 tonnes C of mangroves AGC with a mean value of 21.64 kg C m ⁻² and 24,064 tonnes C of mangroves BGC with a mean value of 5.39 kg C m ⁻². Potentially, there are approximately 120,546 tonnes C of mangrove biomass carbon stock in the Karimunjawa Islands. Remote-sensing reflectance can successfully model mangrove carbon stock based on the relationship between mangrove canopy properties, represented by leaf area index (LAI) and the tree or root biomass carbon stock. The accuracy of the mangrove carbon stock map is subject to errors, which are sourced mainly from: (1) the absence of a species-specific biomass allometric equation for several species present in the study area; (2) the generalized standard conversion value of mangrove biomass to mangrove carbon stock; (3) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and mangrove LAI; (4) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and above-ground mangrove biomass and carbon stock due to its relationship with LAI; (5) the relationship between mangrove LAI and mangrove below-ground parts; (6) the inability to perform mangrove carbon stock modelling at the species level due to the complexities of the mangrove forest in the study area; (7) background reflectance and atmospheric path radiance that could not be completely minimized using image radiometric corrections and transformations; and (8) spatial displacement between the actual location of the mangrove forest in the field and the corresponding pixel in the image. The availability of mangrove biomass carbon stock maps is beneficial for carrying out various management activities, and is also very important for the resilience of mangroves to changing environments. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Among vegetated coastal habitats, mangrove forests are among the densest carbon pools. They store their organic carbon in the surrounding soil and thus the sequestered carbon stays in the sediment for a long time and cannot be easily returned to the atmosphere. Additionally, mangroves also provide various important ecosystem services in coastal areas and surroundings. Accordingly, it is important to understand the distribution of biomass carbon stock in mangrove habitats in a spatial and temporal context, not only to reduce CO
2
concentrations in the atmosphere, but also for their sustainability. The objectives of this research are to map the mangrove carbon stock and estimate the total biomass carbon stock sheltered by mangrove forests, with the Karimunjawa Islands as a study site, using the widely available passive remote sensing system ALOS AVNIR-2. The modelling and mapping of mangrove carbon stock incorporates the integration of image pixel values and mangroves field data via empirical modelling. Vegetation indices and PC bands at different levels of radiometric corrections were all used as the input in the mangrove carbon stock modelling so that the effectiveness and sensitivity of different image transformations to particular radiometric correction levels could be analysed and understood. Afterward, the accuracy and effectiveness of each mangrove carbon stock-mapping routine was compared and evaluated. The accuracy of the best mangrove above-ground carbon stock (AGC) map modelled from vegetation index is 77.1% (EVI1, SE 5.89 kg C m
−2
), and for mangrove below-ground carbon stock (BGC) it is 60.0% (GEMI, SE 2.54 kg C m
−2
). The mangrove carbon stock map from ALOS AVNIR-2 PC bands showed a maximum accuracy of 77.8% (PC2, SE 5.71 kg C m
−2
) and 60.8% (PC2, SE 2.48 kg C m
−2
) for AGC and BGC respectively. From the resulting maps, the Karimunjawa Islands are estimated to shelter 96,482 tonnes C of mangroves AGC with a mean value of 21.64 kg C m
−2
and 24,064 tonnes C of mangroves BGC with a mean value of 5.39 kg C m
−2
. Potentially, there are approximately 120,546 tonnes C of mangrove biomass carbon stock in the Karimunjawa Islands. Remote-sensing reflectance can successfully model mangrove carbon stock based on the relationship between mangrove canopy properties, represented by leaf area index (LAI) and the tree or root biomass carbon stock. The accuracy of the mangrove carbon stock map is subject to errors, which are sourced mainly from: (1) the absence of a species-specific biomass allometric equation for several species present in the study area; (2) the generalized standard conversion value of mangrove biomass to mangrove carbon stock; (3) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and mangrove LAI; (4) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and above-ground mangrove biomass and carbon stock due to its relationship with LAI; (5) the relationship between mangrove LAI and mangrove below-ground parts; (6) the inability to perform mangrove carbon stock modelling at the species level due to the complexities of the mangrove forest in the study area; (7) background reflectance and atmospheric path radiance that could not be completely minimized using image radiometric corrections and transformations; and (8) spatial displacement between the actual location of the mangrove forest in the field and the corresponding pixel in the image. The availability of mangrove biomass carbon stock maps is beneficial for carrying out various management activities, and is also very important for the resilience of mangroves to changing environments. Among vegetated coastal habitats, mangrove forests are among the densest carbon pools. They store their organic carbon in the surrounding soil and thus the sequestered carbon stays in the sediment for a long time and cannot be easily returned to the atmosphere. Additionally, mangroves also provide various important ecosystem services in coastal areas and surroundings. Accordingly, it is important to understand the distribution of biomass carbon stock in mangrove habitats in a spatial and temporal context, not only to reduce CO sub(2) concentrations in the atmosphere, but also for their sustainability. The objectives of this research are to map the mangrove carbon stock and estimate the total biomass carbon stock sheltered by mangrove forests, with the Karimunjawa Islands as a study site, using the widely available passive remote sensing system ALOS AVNIR-2. The modelling and mapping of mangrove carbon stock incorporates the integration of image pixel values and mangroves field data via empirical modelling. Vegetation indices and PC bands at different levels of radiometric corrections were all used as the input in the mangrove carbon stock modelling so that the effectiveness and sensitivity of different image transformations to particular radiometric correction levels could be analysed and understood. Afterward, the accuracy and effectiveness of each mangrove carbon stock-mapping routine was compared and evaluated. The accuracy of the best mangrove above-ground carbon stock (AGC) map modelled from vegetation index is 77.1% (EVI1, SE 5.89 kg C m super(-2)), and for mangrove below-ground carbon stock (BGC) it is 60.0% (GEMI, SE 2.54 kg C m super(-2)). The mangrove carbon stock map from ALOS AVNIR-2 PC bands showed a maximum accuracy of 77.8% (PC2, SE 5.71 kg C m super(-2)) and 60.8% (PC2, SE 2.48 kg C m super(-2)) for AGC and BGC respectively. From the resulting maps, the Karimunjawa Islands are estimated to shelter 96,482 tonnes C of mangroves AGC with a mean value of 21.64 kg C m super(-2) and 24,064 tonnes C of mangroves BGC with a mean value of 5.39 kg C m super(-2). Potentially, there are approximately 120,546 tonnes C of mangrove biomass carbon stock in the Karimunjawa Islands. Remote-sensing reflectance can successfully model mangrove carbon stock based on the relationship between mangrove canopy properties, represented by leaf area index (LAI) and the tree or root biomass carbon stock. The accuracy of the mangrove carbon stock map is subject to errors, which are sourced mainly from: (1) the absence of a species-specific biomass allometric equation for several species present in the study area; (2) the generalized standard conversion value of mangrove biomass to mangrove carbon stock; (3) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and mangrove LAI; (4) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and above-ground mangrove biomass and carbon stock due to its relationship with LAI; (5) the relationship between mangrove LAI and mangrove below-ground parts; (6) the inability to perform mangrove carbon stock modelling at the species level due to the complexities of the mangrove forest in the study area; (7) background reflectance and atmospheric path radiance that could not be completely minimized using image radiometric corrections and transformations; and (8) spatial displacement between the actual location of the mangrove forest in the field and the corresponding pixel in the image. The availability of mangrove biomass carbon stock maps is beneficial for carrying out various management activities, and is also very important for the resilience of mangroves to changing environments. Among vegetated coastal habitats, mangrove forests are among the densest carbon pools. They store their organic carbon in the surrounding soil and thus the sequestered carbon stays in the sediment for a long time and cannot be easily returned to the atmosphere. Additionally, mangroves also provide various important ecosystem services in coastal areas and surroundings. Accordingly, it is important to understand the distribution of biomass carbon stock in mangrove habitats in a spatial and temporal context, not only to reduce CO ₂ concentrations in the atmosphere, but also for their sustainability. The objectives of this research are to map the mangrove carbon stock and estimate the total biomass carbon stock sheltered by mangrove forests, with the Karimunjawa Islands as a study site, using the widely available passive remote sensing system ALOS AVNIR-2. The modelling and mapping of mangrove carbon stock incorporates the integration of image pixel values and mangroves field data via empirical modelling. Vegetation indices and PC bands at different levels of radiometric corrections were all used as the input in the mangrove carbon stock modelling so that the effectiveness and sensitivity of different image transformations to particular radiometric correction levels could be analysed and understood. Afterward, the accuracy and effectiveness of each mangrove carbon stock-mapping routine was compared and evaluated. The accuracy of the best mangrove above-ground carbon stock (AGC) map modelled from vegetation index is 77.1% (EVI1, SE 5.89 kg C m ⁻²), and for mangrove below-ground carbon stock (BGC) it is 60.0% (GEMI, SE 2.54 kg C m ⁻²). The mangrove carbon stock map from ALOS AVNIR-2 PC bands showed a maximum accuracy of 77.8% (PC2, SE 5.71 kg C m ⁻²) and 60.8% (PC2, SE 2.48 kg C m ⁻²) for AGC and BGC respectively. From the resulting maps, the Karimunjawa Islands are estimated to shelter 96,482 tonnes C of mangroves AGC with a mean value of 21.64 kg C m ⁻² and 24,064 tonnes C of mangroves BGC with a mean value of 5.39 kg C m ⁻². Potentially, there are approximately 120,546 tonnes C of mangrove biomass carbon stock in the Karimunjawa Islands. Remote-sensing reflectance can successfully model mangrove carbon stock based on the relationship between mangrove canopy properties, represented by leaf area index (LAI) and the tree or root biomass carbon stock. The accuracy of the mangrove carbon stock map is subject to errors, which are sourced mainly from: (1) the absence of a species-specific biomass allometric equation for several species present in the study area; (2) the generalized standard conversion value of mangrove biomass to mangrove carbon stock; (3) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and mangrove LAI; (4) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and above-ground mangrove biomass and carbon stock due to its relationship with LAI; (5) the relationship between mangrove LAI and mangrove below-ground parts; (6) the inability to perform mangrove carbon stock modelling at the species level due to the complexities of the mangrove forest in the study area; (7) background reflectance and atmospheric path radiance that could not be completely minimized using image radiometric corrections and transformations; and (8) spatial displacement between the actual location of the mangrove forest in the field and the corresponding pixel in the image. The availability of mangrove biomass carbon stock maps is beneficial for carrying out various management activities, and is also very important for the resilience of mangroves to changing environments. Among vegetated coastal habitats, mangrove forests are among the densest carbon pools. They store their organic carbon in the surrounding soil and thus the sequestered carbon stays in the sediment for a long time and cannot be easily returned to the atmosphere. Additionally, mangroves also provide various important ecosystem services in coastal areas and surroundings. Accordingly, it is important to understand the distribution of biomass carbon stock in mangrove habitats in a spatial and temporal context, not only to reduce CO ₂ concentrations in the atmosphere, but also for their sustainability. The objectives of this research are to map the mangrove carbon stock and estimate the total biomass carbon stock sheltered by mangrove forests, with the Karimunjawa Islands as a study site, using the widely available passive remote sensing system ALOS AVNIR-2. The modelling and mapping of mangrove carbon stock incorporates the integration of image pixel values and mangroves field data via empirical modelling. Vegetation indices and PC bands at different levels of radiometric corrections were all used as the input in the mangrove carbon stock modelling so that the effectiveness and sensitivity of different image transformations to particular radiometric correction levels could be analysed and understood. Afterward, the accuracy and effectiveness of each mangrove carbon stock-mapping routine was compared and evaluated. The accuracy of the best mangrove above-ground carbon stock (AGC) map modelled from vegetation index is 77.1% (EVI1, SE 5.89 kg C m ⁻²), and for mangrove below-ground carbon stock (BGC) it is 60.0% (GEMI, SE 2.54 kg C m ⁻²). The mangrove carbon stock map from ALOS AVNIR-2 PC bands showed a maximum accuracy of 77.8% (PC2, SE 5.71 kg C m ⁻²) and 60.8% (PC2, SE 2.48 kg C m ⁻²) for AGC and BGC respectively. From the resulting maps, the Karimunjawa Islands are estimated to shelter 96,482 tonnes C of mangroves AGC with a mean value of 21.64 kg C m ⁻² and 24,064 tonnes C of mangroves BGC with a mean value of 5.39 kg C m ⁻². Potentially, there are approximately 120,546 tonnes C of mangrove biomass carbon stock in the Karimunjawa Islands. Remote-sensing reflectance can successfully model mangrove carbon stock based on the relationship between mangrove canopy properties, represented by leaf area index (LAI) and the tree or root biomass carbon stock. The accuracy of the mangrove carbon stock map is subject to errors, which are sourced mainly from: (1) the absence of a species-specific biomass allometric equation for several species present in the study area; (2) the generalized standard conversion value of mangrove biomass to mangrove carbon stock; (3) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and mangrove LAI; (4) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and above-ground mangrove biomass and carbon stock due to its relationship with LAI; (5) the relationship between mangrove LAI and mangrove below-ground parts; (6) the inability to perform mangrove carbon stock modelling at the species level due to the complexities of the mangrove forest in the study area; (7) background reflectance and atmospheric path radiance that could not be completely minimized using image radiometric corrections and transformations; and (8) spatial displacement between the actual location of the mangrove forest in the field and the corresponding pixel in the image. The availability of mangrove biomass carbon stock maps is beneficial for carrying out various management activities, and is also very important for the resilience of mangroves to changing environments. Among vegetated coastal habitats, mangrove forests are among the densest carbon pools. They store their organic carbon in the surrounding soil and thus the sequestered carbon stays in the sediment for a long time and cannot be easily returned to the atmosphere. Additionally, mangroves also provide various important ecosystem services in coastal areas and surroundings. Accordingly, it is important to understand the distribution of biomass carbon stock in mangrove habitats in a spatial and temporal context, not only to reduce CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, but also for their sustainability. The objectives of this research are to map the mangrove carbon stock and estimate the total biomass carbon stock sheltered by mangrove forests, with the Karimunjawa Islands as a study site, using the widely available passive remote sensing system ALOS AVNIR-2. The modelling and mapping of mangrove carbon stock incorporates the integration of image pixel values and mangroves field data via empirical modelling. Vegetation indices and PC bands at different levels of radiometric corrections were all used as the input in the mangrove carbon stock modelling so that the effectiveness and sensitivity of different image transformations to particular radiometric correction levels could be analysed and understood. Afterward, the accuracy and effectiveness of each mangrove carbon stock-mapping routine was compared and evaluated. The accuracy of the best mangrove above-ground carbon stock (AGC) map modelled from vegetation index is 77.1% (EVI1, SE 5.89 kg C m-2), and for mangrove below-ground carbon stock (BGC) it is 60.0% (GEMI, SE 2.54 kg C m-2). The mangrove carbon stock map from ALOS AVNIR-2 PC bands showed a maximum accuracy of 77.8% (PC2, SE 5.71 kg C m-2) and 60.8% (PC2, SE 2.48 kg C m-2) for AGC and BGC respectively. From the resulting maps, the Karimunjawa Islands are estimated to shelter 96,482 tonnes C of mangroves AGC with a mean value of 21.64 kg C m-2 and 24,064 tonnes C of mangroves BGC with a mean value of 5.39 kg C m-2. Potentially, there are approximately 120,546 tonnes C of mangrove biomass carbon stock in the Karimunjawa Islands. Remote-sensing reflectance can successfully model mangrove carbon stock based on the relationship between mangrove canopy properties, represented by leaf area index (LAI) and the tree or root biomass carbon stock. The accuracy of the mangrove carbon stock map is subject to errors, which are sourced mainly from: (1) the absence of a species-specific biomass allometric equation for several species present in the study area; (2) the generalized standard conversion value of mangrove biomass to mangrove carbon stock; (3) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and mangrove LAI; (4) the relationship between mangrove reflectance and above-ground mangrove biomass and carbon stock due to its relationship with LAI; (5) the relationship between mangrove LAI and mangrove below-ground parts; (6) the inability to perform mangrove carbon stock modelling at the species level due to the complexities of the mangrove forest in the study area; (7) background reflectance and atmospheric path radiance that could not be completely minimized using image radiometric corrections and transformations; and (8) spatial displacement between the actual location of the mangrove forest in the field and the corresponding pixel in the image. The availability of mangrove biomass carbon stock maps is beneficial for carrying out various management activities, and is also very important for the resilience of mangroves to changing environments. |
Author | Wicaksono, Pramaditya Nehren, Udo Hartono Danoedoro, Projo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Pramaditya surname: Wicaksono fullname: Wicaksono, Pramaditya email: prama.wicaksono@geo.ugm.ac.id organization: ITT, Cologne University of Applied Sciences – sequence: 2 givenname: Projo surname: Danoedoro fullname: Danoedoro, Projo organization: Cartography and Remote Sensing, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada – sequence: 3 surname: Hartono fullname: Hartono organization: Cartography and Remote Sensing, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada – sequence: 4 givenname: Udo surname: Nehren fullname: Nehren, Udo organization: ITT, Cologne University of Applied Sciences |
BookMark | eNqNkUFvFCEYhompiW31JxhJvHjZlW8YYCZeNI22jTUetGfyDQsr6wyMwNj038tma2J6WU-Q8LxvPr7njJyEGCwhL4GtgXXsLYOWA0hYNwzEGgCUVP0TcgpcypXoGZz8c39GznLeMcakEuqUmC8Ytin-tnTwccKcqcE0xEBzieYnnXCefdjS6Gj5YelnTH5awg7vkF7nEcMm0yXvgWkZi8-zNSXhSJOdYrE027B_fE6eOhyzffFwnpPbTx-_X1ytbr5eXl98uFmZVkJZScNhAMNs23RSwCCdYb0cmOtRWMcRRSfV0Ay8aRzvNsp01qGRTJiB4aAafk7eHHrnFH8tNhc9-WzsWOe0cckaOhB91yrF_gNlvG61VeI4qvo6ZqNEW9HXj9BdXFKof9bQq2pFCikr9e5AmRRzTtZp4wsWH0PdnR81ML3Xqv9q1Xut-kFrTYtH6bk6wXR_NPf-kPPBxTThXUzjRhe8H2NyCYPxWfNjFa8OFQ6jxm2qidtvlZCs8l3bNfwPvqLELw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rsase_2021_100612 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_022_22216_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_112653 crossref_primary_10_1080_01431161_2017_1283072 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13081427 crossref_primary_10_1049_iet_ipr_2017_0295 crossref_primary_10_1080_01431161_2019_1601289 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e21485 crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202344203001 crossref_primary_10_1080_10106049_2022_2160832 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2019_111223 crossref_primary_10_3390_f12050637 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12040597 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ocecoaman_2020_105193 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rineng_2025_104211 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12091383 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2021_112816 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_1350_1_012043 crossref_primary_10_3390_f14010094 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2025_103096 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_111653 crossref_primary_10_1111_geb_13549 crossref_primary_10_3390_f10070559 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_173270 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2022_101743 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14194868 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecss_2018_09_022 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_1127_1_012034 crossref_primary_10_3390_f14091796 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11852_024_01091_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rsma_2021_101985 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_1419_1_012042 crossref_primary_10_1051_bioconf_20237003005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isprsjprs_2017_10_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rsase_2023_100959 crossref_primary_10_1051_bioconf_202413402003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2022_108694 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12091519 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_earscirev_2023_104501 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12050777 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jag_2019_101986 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13132565 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13126970 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs10020172 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cageo_2021_104737 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_8103242 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_023_12151_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_01431161_2018_1471544 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isprsjprs_2017_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1080_01431161_2021_1931538 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_169_1_012078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2016_11_015 crossref_primary_10_1109_LGRS_2024_3400027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rsma_2021_101730 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs10091468 crossref_primary_10_1080_01431161_2022_2074809 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asr_2021_11_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rsma_2023_102932 crossref_primary_10_20473_jipk_v14i1_31789 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs17060964 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ac4d4d crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_47_1_012014 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs11182156 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12142289 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_1441_1_012002 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14020706 crossref_primary_10_3390_f12101375 crossref_primary_10_5721_EuJRS20164924 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs15245645 |
Cites_doi | 10.2747/1548-1603.45.2.188 10.1007/s11269-008-9318-9 10.3390/rs3050878 10.14358/PERS.71.8.967 10.1109/LGRS.2010.2086430 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.029 10.1007/s11676-010-0100-5 10.1071/BT04162 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.07.010 10.1080/01431169308904363 10.2134/agronj2007.0362 10.1007/BF00031911 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.012 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006 10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.015 10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.08.002 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90122-Z 10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000060016x 10.1080/01431161.2013.813090 10.1016/j.rse.2007.01.009 10.5194/nhess-10-89-2010 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2 10.1038/nclimate1601 10.3319/TAO.2004.15.1.15(A) 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00289-9 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00064-4 10.1029/2007JG000551 10.3759/tropics.12.35 10.2166/wst.2003.0331 10.1029/2007GB003052 10.1109/36.134076 10.1080/01431160701227638 10.1080/10106049209354353 10.1016/0378-1127(89)90034-0 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00197-8 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.01.001 10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.029 10.14358/PERS.72.3.299 10.3390/rs3102222 10.1080/01431161.2014.978034 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.006 10.1109/36.739128 10.1080/01431160110107725 10.1016/j.rse.2004.12.016 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.007 10.1109/36.298018 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.003 10.1017/S0266467405002476 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0755 10.1016/j.jag.2014.10.008 10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.016 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 2015 Taylor & Francis |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 – notice: 2015 Taylor & Francis |
DBID | FBQ AAYXX CITATION 7TG 7TN 8FD F1W FR3 H8D H96 KL. KR7 L.G L7M 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1080/01431161.2015.1117679 |
DatabaseName | AGRIS CrossRef Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Technology Research Database ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Civil Engineering Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Aerospace Database Civil Engineering Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Oceanic Abstracts Technology Research Database ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Aerospace Database Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic AGRICOLA Aerospace Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Geography |
EISSN | 1366-5901 |
EndPage | 52 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1080_01431161_2015_1117679 1117679 US201600148482 |
Genre | Article |
GeographicLocations | Karimunjawa Islands ISEW, Indonesia, Jawa, Jawa Tengah, Karimunjawa Is |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Karimunjawa Islands – name: ISEW, Indonesia, Jawa, Jawa Tengah, Karimunjawa Is |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: CNRD (Center for Natural Resources and Development) grantid: Scholarship |
GroupedDBID | -~X .7F .DC .QJ 07I 0BK 0R~ 1TA 29J 30N 4.4 4B5 5GY 5VS 6TJ AAENE AAHBH AAJMT AALDU AAMIU AAPUL AAQRR ABCCY ABDPE ABFIM ABFMO ABHAV ABJNI ABLIJ ABLJU ABPAQ ABPEM ABRLO ABTAH ABXUL ABXYU ACGEJ ACGFS ACIWK ACTIO ACTTO ADCVX ADGTB ADXEU ADXPE ADYSH AEHZU AEISY AENEX AEOZL AEPSL AEXLP AEYOC AEZBV AFBWG AFION AFKVX AFRVT AGBLW AGDLA AGMYJ AGVKY AGWUF AHDZW AI. AIDBO AIJEM AIYEW AJWEG AKBVH AKHJE AKMBP AKOOK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU ALRRR ALXIB AQRUH AVBZW AWYRJ BGSSV BLEHA BWMZZ C0- C5H CAG CCCUG CE4 COF CS3 CYRSC DAOYK DEXXA DGEBU DKSSO DU5 EBS EJD E~A E~B F5P FBQ FETWF H13 HF~ H~9 IFELN IPNFZ J.P KYCEM L8C LJTGL M4Z OPCYK P2P RIG RNANH ROSJB RTWRZ S-T SNACF TAJZE TAP TBQAZ TDBHL TEN TFL TFT TFW TN5 TNC TQWBC TTHFI TUROJ TWF UAO UB6 UPT UT5 UU3 VH1 VOH ZGOLN ZY4 ~02 ~S~ AAGDL AAHIA AAYXX AMPGV CITATION 7TG 7TN 8FD F1W FR3 H8D H96 KL. KR7 L.G L7M TASJS 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-6c31b1c0e428651b6fc096b0f9a5ef3aa5867b2b322f38d7c8efac605cb0ab723 |
ISSN | 1366-5901 0143-1161 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 07 14:58:52 EDT 2025 Wed Jul 02 04:38:49 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:40:44 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 08:36:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:04:45 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:49 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:04:06 EST 2024 Thu Apr 03 09:45:29 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c461t-6c31b1c0e428651b6fc096b0f9a5ef3aa5867b2b322f38d7c8efac605cb0ab723 |
Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1117679 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1977676566 |
PQPubID | 2045515 |
PageCount | 27 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1815984770 proquest_miscellaneous_1803143475 proquest_miscellaneous_1790962754 proquest_journals_1977676566 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_01431161_2015_1117679 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_01431161_2015_1117679 fao_agris_US201600148482 crossref_primary_10_1080_01431161_2015_1117679 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-01-02 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-01-02 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2016 text: 2016-01-02 day: 02 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | International journal of remote sensing |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd |
References | CIT0072 CIT0071 CIT0030 CIT0074 CIT0076 CIT0031 CIT0075 CIT0034 CIT0078 CIT0033 Green E. P. (CIT0020) 2000 Liu G. R. (CIT0041) 2004; 15 Martawijaya A. (CIT0044) 1992; 2 Oohata S. (CIT0053) 1979; 29 CIT0036 Fatoyinbo T. E. (CIT0017) 2010 CIT0035 CIT0038 CIT0039 Shinozaki K. (CIT0065) 1964; 14 CIT0040 CIT0043 CIT0042 CIT0001 CIT0045 Edwards A. (CIT0013) 2004 Simard M. (CIT0066) 2008; 112 CIT0003 CIT0047 CIT0002 CIT0049 CIT0004 CIT0048 CIT0007 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0008 CIT0052 Boonsong K. (CIT0005) 2003; 48 CIT0010 CIT0054 CIT0012 CIT0011 CIT0055 Laffoley D. D. (CIT0037) 2009 Nellemann C. (CIT0050) 2009 Ong J. E. (CIT0051) 2002 CIT0014 CIT0058 CIT0057 CIT0016 CIT0059 CIT0018 CIT0019 CIT0061 CIT0060 CIT0021 CIT0064 CIT0023 CIT0067 CIT0022 Jusoff K. (CIT0027) 2006; 1 Knyazikhin Y. (CIT0032) 1999 Vaiphasa C. (CIT0069) 2006; 61 CIT0025 CIT0024 CIT0026 CIT0029 CIT0028 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0047 doi: 10.2747/1548-1603.45.2.188 – ident: CIT0031 doi: 10.1007/s11269-008-9318-9 – ident: CIT0036 doi: 10.3390/rs3050878 – ident: CIT0048 – ident: CIT0042 doi: 10.14358/PERS.71.8.967 – ident: CIT0071 doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2010.2086430 – volume-title: International Science Roundtable for the Media year: 2002 ident: CIT0051 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.029 – ident: CIT0054 doi: 10.1007/s11676-010-0100-5 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1071/BT04162 – start-page: 183 volume-title: Remote Sensing Handbook for Tropical Coastal Management year: 2000 ident: CIT0020 – volume: 1 start-page: 27 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: CIT0027 publication-title: Journal of Sustainability Science and Management – ident: CIT0078 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.07.010 – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1080/01431169308904363 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.2134/agronj2007.0362 – volume: 14 start-page: 133 year: 1964 ident: CIT0065 publication-title: Japanese Journal of Ecology – ident: CIT0055 doi: 10.1007/BF00031911 – volume: 61 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: CIT0069 publication-title: PandRS – ident: CIT0019 doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.012 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006 – ident: CIT0038 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.015 – volume: 112 start-page: 2131 issue: 5 year: 2008 ident: CIT0066 publication-title: Remote Sensing of Environment, Earth Observations for Terrestrial Biodiversity and Ecosystems Special Issue – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x – ident: CIT0052 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.08.002 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90122-Z – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000060016x – ident: CIT0035 doi: 10.1080/01431161.2013.813090 – ident: CIT0058 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.01.009 – ident: CIT0074 – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-89-2010 – ident: CIT0023 doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2 – ident: CIT0076 doi: 10.1038/nclimate1601 – volume: 15 start-page: 15 issue: 1 year: 2004 ident: CIT0041 publication-title: TAO doi: 10.3319/TAO.2004.15.1.15(A) – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00289-9 – volume-title: MODIS Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation Absorbed by Vegetation (FPAR) Product (MOD15) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document year: 1999 ident: CIT0032 – volume-title: Blue Carbon. A Rapid Response Assessment year: 2009 ident: CIT0050 – ident: CIT0059 doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00064-4 – volume-title: Bilko Tutorial on the Applications of Satellite and Airborne Image Data to Coastal Management year: 2004 ident: CIT0013 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1029/2007JG000551 – volume-title: Biomass year: 2010 ident: CIT0017 – ident: CIT0057 doi: 10.3759/tropics.12.35 – volume: 48 start-page: 257 year: 2003 ident: CIT0005 publication-title: Water Science and Technology doi: 10.2166/wst.2003.0331 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1029/2007GB003052 – ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.1109/36.134076 – ident: CIT0040 doi: 10.1080/01431160701227638 – ident: CIT0061 doi: 10.1080/10106049209354353 – ident: CIT0011 doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(89)90034-0 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00197-8 – volume: 29 start-page: 323 year: 1979 ident: CIT0053 publication-title: Japanese Journal of Ecology – ident: CIT0039 doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.01.001 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.029 – volume: 2 volume-title: Indonesia Wood Atlas year: 1992 ident: CIT0044 – ident: CIT0067 doi: 10.14358/PERS.72.3.299 – ident: CIT0028 doi: 10.3390/rs3102222 – ident: CIT0075 doi: 10.1080/01431161.2014.978034 – ident: CIT0033 doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.006 – ident: CIT0045 doi: 10.1109/36.739128 – ident: CIT0060 doi: 10.1080/01431160110107725 – ident: CIT0003 – ident: CIT0064 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.12.016 – ident: CIT0049 doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.007 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1109/36.298018 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.003 – ident: CIT0034 doi: 10.1017/S0266467405002476 – ident: CIT0043 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0755 – volume-title: The Management of Natural Coastal Carbon Sinks year: 2009 ident: CIT0037 – ident: CIT0072 – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.10.008 – ident: CIT0002 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.016 |
SSID | ssj0006757 |
Score | 2.4683735 |
Snippet | Among vegetated coastal habitats, mangrove forests are among the densest carbon pools. They store their organic carbon in the surrounding soil and thus the... |
SourceID | proquest crossref informaworld fao |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 26 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Allometry ALOS (satellite) Area Atmosphere Atmospheric models Biomass canopy Carbon Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide concentration carbon sequestration carbon sinks Changing environments Coastal ecology Coastal zone coasts Corrections Detection Ecosystem services Empirical analysis Empirical models Environmental changes equations Forests habitats Islands Leaf area index mangrove forests Mangrove swamps Mangroves Mapping Mathematical models Modelling Organic carbon Pixels Plant cover Radiance Radiometric correction radiometry Raw materials Reflectance Remote sensing sediments Shelters Soil Sustainability Transformations trees underground parts Vegetation Vegetation index |
Title | Mangrove biomass carbon stock mapping of the Karimunjawa Islands using multispectral remote sensing |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01431161.2015.1117679 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1977676566 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1790962754 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1803143475 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1815984770 |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELe67QFeJj61soGMxFuVKm6-nMcJNirYBhKtqHixbMfeKDSpulZI_PXcxW6bsmobvERV4ySV75f76t3vCHnT4yozqbFBZHo2iBUPA25zFXAmmTQ6tYXFRuHzi7Q_jD-MklGrNW1ULS3mqqt_b-0r-R-pwncgV-yS_QfJrm4KX8BnkC8cQcJwvJeMz2V5Oauw_Pw7lvnUPNMKxAkOnf7Rmcjp1Nc0o3f5EaLiyaIcy1-yg0DAUthFnSmoiwrrlstZTfMP0jOda6xs92ZtvC53X2cPG5wTWy6pUzlaYv9-nYz9PJMTWYDLvzIDgLcK55z409W4Wiemr2ZOGw6LqpmWYC4tsZmpjALGHNN61zjtGqVpgM2uTfXrOF82YOZ1adqwyo7m9oa-9wWS8Cx8FFbqJWgEstRNqNnk1774JE6HZ2dicDIa7JC9HgQWoBn3jvvvvn1dWW8IoFyLvf_5y64v5GPf9pgNf2bHyuovztsbNr52XAaPyL6POOixg89j0jLlE_LgvfFc5U-JXsKIehhRByNaw4h6GNHKUoARbcCIehjRGkZ0A0bUYYJ6TDwjw9OTwdt-4GdvBDpO2TxIdcQU06GJsXWZYUsYBLsqtLlMjI2kTHiaqZ4Ce2AjXmSaGys1xMZahVLBxj4nu2VVmgNCU56Bf6RVlKk8jouIh0rbsFBKF6pgWdEm8XIHhfbE9Dgf5adgS_5av_ECN174jW-T7uqyqWNmueuCAxCPkJdgPcXwC4IWEwQ85r02yZsyE_M6W2bdaBsR3XHbo6WAhX_zrgXLkSULY6U2eb06DZob_46TpakWsCbLQxx9lcS3rOE4XiKKs-S2NRCSgJOZhS_useaQPFy_rkdkdz5bmJfgV8_VK_8q_AHTYcyB |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELZoOZQLb9SFAkbimiWOndg5oqrVQrt7oSv1ZtmOHdTSBGWzoPbXM5PHqhTRHnqO7cjOzPibycw3hHxMlJU-8yHiPgmRsCqOVMhtpJhhxrssFAELheeLbLYUX0_T02u1MJhWiT506IkiOluNyo3B6DEl7hNy0jGAKpiZlaLSy0zmW-RhmmcSZZ3Hi401BkDcl0wjFSfMGat4_rfMX_fTVjD1DQ7Tf2x2dxEdPiFu3EKff3I-Xbd26q5usDveb49PyeMBp9LPvWA9Iw989ZzsDC3Tv1--IG5uqrKpf3mKFfwAwakzja0rCmjSndMLg8QPJa0DBYhJj8Alv1hXZ-a3oSiFVbGimHJf0i6jsav3bOB9jQfR8XSFafVV-ZIsDw9O9mfR0LEhciJjbZQ5zixzsRdY8MqwkAhcJBuH3KQ-cGNSlUmbWLAigatCOuWDceBRORsbKxP-imxXdeV3Cc0U-KaJs1zaXIiCq9i6EBfWusIWTBYTIsbvpN1AZ45dNX5oNrKeDieo8QT1cIITMt1M-9nzedw1YReEQJsSbK5efkuQkQ-jsEIlE5JflwzddjGW0DdE0fyOZfdGMdKD1VhpliO3EiLsCfmweQz6jj9xTOXrNYyReYwNk1JxyxiFTQm4kOltYwDIAjSR8et7bOM92ZmdzI_18ZfF0RvyCE-ni08le2S7bdb-LSC21r7rVPIPpvkxJg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Nb9QwELVokYAL36gLBYzENUucOLFzRMCqULpCgpW4WR7HDqI0qbJZEPx6ZvKxgiLaQ8-xHdkZj984894w9jzRoHzuQ5T6JEQSdBzpUECkhRXWuzyUgYjCR8v8YCXffc6mbML1mFZJMXQYhCJ6X02b-7QMU0bcC5KkE4hUKDEroz2vclXssKs5ES2JxREvt84Y8fDAmCYlTuwzkXj-N8xfx9NOsM0ZCdN_XHZ_Di1uMZhmMKSfHM83HczdrzPijpea4m12c0Sp_OVgVnfYFV_fZdfHgulfft5j7sjWVdt895z4-wjAubMtNDVHLOmO-Ykl2YeKN4EjwOSHGJCfbOqv9oflZIN1ueaUcF_xPp-xZ3u2-L7Wo-F4vqak-rq6z1aLN59eHURjvYbIyVx0Ue5SAcLFXhLdVRCNCAMkiENhMx9SazOdK0gAfUhIdamc9sE6jKccxBZUkj5gu3VT-z3Gc42RaeIgVVBIWaY6BhfiEsCVUApVzpicPpNxo5g51dT4ZsSkeTquoKEVNOMKzth82-10UPO4qMMe2oCxFXpcs_qYkB4f3cFKncxY8adhmK6_YQlDORSTXjDs_mRFZvQZayMKUlYifD1jz7aPcbfTLxxb-2aDbVQRU7mkTJ7TRlNJglSq7Lw2CGMRmKj44SWm8ZRd-_B6Yd6_XR4-YjdocfrLqWSf7Xbtxj9GuNbBk35D_gauuy_K |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mangrove+biomass+carbon+stock+mapping+of+the+Karimunjawa+Islands+using+multispectral+remote+sensing&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+remote+sensing&rft.au=Wicaksono%2C+Pramaditya&rft.au=Danoedoro%2C+Projo&rft.au=Nehren%2C+Udo&rft.date=2016-01-02&rft.issn=0143-1161&rft.eissn=1366-5901&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=52&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F01431161.2015.1117679&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1366-5901&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1366-5901&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1366-5901&client=summon |