National Survey of Emergency Department Alcohol Screening and Intervention Practices

• Published in: Annals of emergency medicine Vol. 55; no. 6; pp. 556 - 562
• Main Authors: Cunningham, Rebecca M., MD, Harrison, Stephanie R., PhD, MPH, McKay, Mary Pat, MD, Mello, Michael J., MD, MPH, Sochor, Mark, MD, Shandro, Jamie R., MD, MPH, Walton, Maureen A., MPH, PhD, D'Onofrio, Gail, MD, MS
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.06.2010; Elsevier
• Subjects: Alcohol Drinking - epidemiology; Alcohol Drinking - prevention & control; Alcohol-Related Disorders - diagnosis; Alcohol-Related Disorders - prevention & control; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Attitude of Health Personnel; Biological and medical sciences; Cross-Sectional Studies; Emergency; Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration; Health Care Surveys; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Intensive care medicine; Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward; Medical sciences; Substance Abuse Detection; United States; Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology; Wounds and Injuries - etiology; United States; Alcohol; Intensive care; Emergency department; Medical screening; Resuscitation
• DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.004
• ISSN: 0196-0644

Study objective We describe current alcohol screening and brief intervention practices in emergency departments (EDs) at Level I and Level II trauma centers and characterize ED directors' attitudes and perceived barriers associated with these practices among injured patients in the ED. Methods ED directors at Level I and Level II trauma centers were surveyed about current alcohol screening and intervention practices in the ED, as well as knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to these practices. Results Nearly half (46.0%) of ED directors surveyed responded. The majority (64.5%) reported using a serum alcohol level to routinely screen for unhealthy alcohol use; only 23.6% routinely use standardized instruments. Sixty-five percent of ED directors support screening and 70% support intervention among injured ED patients. Only 15% reported having formal screening and intervention policies in their ED, and 9% reported offering brief alcohol intervention by trained personnel. The most commonly perceived barriers to implementation are provider time (83%) and financial resources (55%). Of injured patients identified as exhibiting alcohol misuse, few (12%) receive brief intervention conducted by trained personnel. Conclusion Current alcohol screening and brief intervention practices are lagging behind national guidelines. Although the majority of ED directors support the idea of alcohol screening and intervention, these beliefs have not yet been translated to routine clinical care.