A comparison of wound healing between a skin protectant ointment and a medical device topical emulsion after laser resurfacing of the perioral area

Currently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and reduce downtime, with minimal irritation. This study compared the wound healing efficacy and safety of Aquaphor Healing Ointment (AHO) (Beiersdorf Inc, Wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. S36 - S43
Main Author Sarnoff, Deborah S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.03.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Currently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and reduce downtime, with minimal irritation. This study compared the wound healing efficacy and safety of Aquaphor Healing Ointment (AHO) (Beiersdorf Inc, Wilton, CT) and Biafine Topical Emulsion (BTE) (OrthoNeutrogena, Los Angeles, CA) treatment after laser resurfacing of the perioral area. In this double-blind, split-face study, 20 subjects with perioral rhytides received fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. AHO and BTE were applied to opposite sides of the face 4 times daily after the resurfacing procedure. Clinical grading of erythema, edema, epithelial confluence, crusting/scabbing, subjective irritation, and general wound appearance were assessed using 5-point scales on days 2, 4, 7, and 14. Subjects ranked the two treatment sites daily as to which side of their face looked better. AHO resulted in significantly less erythema (days 2 and 7) and crusting/scabbing (days 2, 4, and 7) and higher epithelial confluence (day 4) than BTE ( P ≤ .042). Subjective irritation assessments demonstrated significantly less stinging, itching, and tightness at day 2 and tightness at day 7 with AHO than with BTE ( P ≤ .049). General wound appearance was graded significantly higher for AHO on days 2 and 7 ( P ≤ .049). Significantly more subjects preferred AHO to BTE ( P ≤ .046). This was a small study in a homogenous population of white women. AHO exhibited superiority to BTE in several wound healing parameters and in overall wound condition.
AbstractList Currently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and reduce downtime, with minimal irritation. This study compared the wound healing efficacy and safety of Aquaphor Healing Ointment (AHO) (Beiersdorf Inc, Wilton, CT) and Biafine Topical Emulsion (BTE) (OrthoNeutrogena, Los Angeles, CA) treatment after laser resurfacing of the perioral area. In this double-blind, split-face study, 20 subjects with perioral rhytides received fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. AHO and BTE were applied to opposite sides of the face 4 times daily after the resurfacing procedure. Clinical grading of erythema, edema, epithelial confluence, crusting/scabbing, subjective irritation, and general wound appearance were assessed using 5-point scales on days 2, 4, 7, and 14. Subjects ranked the two treatment sites daily as to which side of their face looked better. AHO resulted in significantly less erythema (days 2 and 7) and crusting/scabbing (days 2, 4, and 7) and higher epithelial confluence (day 4) than BTE ( P ≤ .042). Subjective irritation assessments demonstrated significantly less stinging, itching, and tightness at day 2 and tightness at day 7 with AHO than with BTE ( P ≤ .049). General wound appearance was graded significantly higher for AHO on days 2 and 7 ( P ≤ .049). Significantly more subjects preferred AHO to BTE ( P ≤ .046). This was a small study in a homogenous population of white women. AHO exhibited superiority to BTE in several wound healing parameters and in overall wound condition.
Background Currently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and reduce downtime, with minimal irritation. Objective This study compared the wound healing efficacy and safety of Aquaphor Healing Ointment (AHO) (Beiersdorf Inc, Wilton, CT) and Biafine Topical Emulsion (BTE) (OrthoNeutrogena, Los Angeles, CA) treatment after laser resurfacing of the perioral area. Methods In this double-blind, split-face study, 20 subjects with perioral rhytides received fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. AHO and BTE were applied to opposite sides of the face 4 times daily after the resurfacing procedure. Clinical grading of erythema, edema, epithelial confluence, crusting/scabbing, subjective irritation, and general wound appearance were assessed using 5-point scales on days 2, 4, 7, and 14. Subjects ranked the two treatment sites daily as to which side of their face looked better. Results AHO resulted in significantly less erythema (days 2 and 7) and crusting/scabbing (days 2, 4, and 7) and higher epithelial confluence (day 4) than BTE ( P ≤ .042). Subjective irritation assessments demonstrated significantly less stinging, itching, and tightness at day 2 and tightness at day 7 with AHO than with BTE ( P ≤ .049). General wound appearance was graded significantly higher for AHO on days 2 and 7 ( P ≤ .049). Significantly more subjects preferred AHO to BTE ( P ≤ .046). Limitations This was a small study in a homogenous population of white women. Conclusions AHO exhibited superiority to BTE in several wound healing parameters and in overall wound condition.
Currently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and reduce downtime, with minimal irritation. This study compared the wound healing efficacy and safety of Aquaphor Healing Ointment (AHO) (Beiersdorf Inc, Wilton, CT) and Biafine Topical Emulsion (BTE) (OrthoNeutrogena, Los Angeles, CA) treatment after laser resurfacing of the perioral area. In this double-blind, split-face study, 20 subjects with perioral rhytides received fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. AHO and BTE were applied to opposite sides of the face 4 times daily after the resurfacing procedure. Clinical grading of erythema, edema, epithelial confluence, crusting/scabbing, subjective irritation, and general wound appearance were assessed using 5-point scales on days 2, 4, 7, and 14. Subjects ranked the two treatment sites daily as to which side of their face looked better. AHO resulted in significantly less erythema (days 2 and 7) and crusting/scabbing (days 2, 4, and 7) and higher epithelial confluence (day 4) than BTE (P ≤ .042). Subjective irritation assessments demonstrated significantly less stinging, itching, and tightness at day 2 and tightness at day 7 with AHO than with BTE (P ≤ .049). General wound appearance was graded significantly higher for AHO on days 2 and 7 (P ≤ .049). Significantly more subjects preferred AHO to BTE (P ≤ .046). This was a small study in a homogenous population of white women. AHO exhibited superiority to BTE in several wound healing parameters and in overall wound condition.
Currently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and reduce downtime, with minimal irritation.BACKGROUNDCurrently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and reduce downtime, with minimal irritation.This study compared the wound healing efficacy and safety of Aquaphor Healing Ointment (AHO) (Beiersdorf Inc, Wilton, CT) and Biafine Topical Emulsion (BTE) (OrthoNeutrogena, Los Angeles, CA) treatment after laser resurfacing of the perioral area.OBJECTIVEThis study compared the wound healing efficacy and safety of Aquaphor Healing Ointment (AHO) (Beiersdorf Inc, Wilton, CT) and Biafine Topical Emulsion (BTE) (OrthoNeutrogena, Los Angeles, CA) treatment after laser resurfacing of the perioral area.In this double-blind, split-face study, 20 subjects with perioral rhytides received fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. AHO and BTE were applied to opposite sides of the face 4 times daily after the resurfacing procedure. Clinical grading of erythema, edema, epithelial confluence, crusting/scabbing, subjective irritation, and general wound appearance were assessed using 5-point scales on days 2, 4, 7, and 14. Subjects ranked the two treatment sites daily as to which side of their face looked better.METHODSIn this double-blind, split-face study, 20 subjects with perioral rhytides received fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. AHO and BTE were applied to opposite sides of the face 4 times daily after the resurfacing procedure. Clinical grading of erythema, edema, epithelial confluence, crusting/scabbing, subjective irritation, and general wound appearance were assessed using 5-point scales on days 2, 4, 7, and 14. Subjects ranked the two treatment sites daily as to which side of their face looked better.AHO resulted in significantly less erythema (days 2 and 7) and crusting/scabbing (days 2, 4, and 7) and higher epithelial confluence (day 4) than BTE (P ≤ .042). Subjective irritation assessments demonstrated significantly less stinging, itching, and tightness at day 2 and tightness at day 7 with AHO than with BTE (P ≤ .049). General wound appearance was graded significantly higher for AHO on days 2 and 7 (P ≤ .049). Significantly more subjects preferred AHO to BTE (P ≤ .046).RESULTSAHO resulted in significantly less erythema (days 2 and 7) and crusting/scabbing (days 2, 4, and 7) and higher epithelial confluence (day 4) than BTE (P ≤ .042). Subjective irritation assessments demonstrated significantly less stinging, itching, and tightness at day 2 and tightness at day 7 with AHO than with BTE (P ≤ .049). General wound appearance was graded significantly higher for AHO on days 2 and 7 (P ≤ .049). Significantly more subjects preferred AHO to BTE (P ≤ .046).This was a small study in a homogenous population of white women.LIMITATIONSThis was a small study in a homogenous population of white women.AHO exhibited superiority to BTE in several wound healing parameters and in overall wound condition.CONCLUSIONSAHO exhibited superiority to BTE in several wound healing parameters and in overall wound condition.
Author Sarnoff, Deborah S.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Deborah S.
  surname: Sarnoff
  fullname: Sarnoff, Deborah S.
  email: sarnoffandgotkin@aol.com
  organization: Cosmetique Dermatology, Laser & Plastic Surgery LLP, New York, New York
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21247664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFks1u1DAUhS1URKeFF2CBvGM1g-14khghpKriT6rEAlhbd-xr6mliB9tp1efghXGYwqISZeM_nXOu7v18Qo5CDEjIc842nPH21X6zB7AbwZYHvmFcPiIrzlS3bru-OyIrxhVbq1aIY3KS854xpmTTPSHHggvZta1ckZ9n1MRxguRzDDQ6ehPnYOklwuDDd7rDcoMYKNB85QOdUixoCoRCow9lxHqAKgc6ovUGBmrx2hukJU6_rzjOQ_Y1GVzBRAfIdU2Y5-TALAVqxXKJdMLkY6oGSAhPyWMHQ8Znd_sp-fb-3dfzj-uLzx8-nZ9drI1seVmLFlzL1U6YLesaCcY1OyUsWNMp2zumFBPQc9crZyWXQvaA28Yybl3TglLNKXl5yK1t_ZgxFz36bHAYIGCcs-63jVJS8KYqX9wp513tVE_Jj5Bu9Z85VoE4CEyKOSd0fyWc6QWW3usFll5gac51hVVN_T2T8QVKHVdJ4IeHrW8OVqzzufaYdDYeg6kUUgWkbfQP29_es5uKeyF2hbeY93FOoU5ec52FZvrL8pGWf8QZE5zLtga8_nfA_6r_As-z2bg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_14764172_2017_1400166
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijd_13922
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2019_04_043
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsc_2013_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijbiomac_2019_03_192
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_toxlet_2012_03_797
crossref_primary_10_5812_ircmj_16239
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10103_012_1257_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_ph16040573
crossref_primary_10_3109_14764172_2014_968583
crossref_primary_10_1097_DSS_0000000000002712
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsc_2012_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1080_13880209_2016_1233569
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jep_2016_05_029
crossref_primary_10_1111_jdv_12332
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yder_2011_09_029
crossref_primary_10_1515_med_2019_0103
Cites_doi 10.1002/lsm.10172
10.1055/s-0029-1242036
10.1002/lsm.20405
10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30006.x
10.1002/lsm.20048
10.1001/archderm.136.6.725
10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08116.x
10.1016/j.det.2009.08.004
10.1080/14628830050516353
10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70489-5
10.1097/00000637-199702000-00001
10.1097/00006534-199706000-00003
10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1999)24:2<87::AID-LSM3>3.0.CO;2-P
10.1016/j.det.2009.08.009
10.1097/00006534-199610000-00005
10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99042.x
10.1016/j.mla.2008.02.002
10.1016/j.fsc.2007.01.007
10.1016/S1076-0512(97)00510-4
10.1016/j.asj.2009.05.004
10.1001/archfacial.2009.97
10.1097/01.prs.0000220464.91795.07
10.1001/archderm.1996.03890280047007
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
– notice: American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-6787
EndPage S43
ExternalDocumentID 21247664
10_1016_j_jaad_2010_11_014
S0190962210021146
1_s2_0_S0190962210021146
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Beiersdorf Inc
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
-RU
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.XZ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1CY
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
354
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8F7
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEA
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HX~
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
KOM
LZ2
M27
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OB.
OBH
OHH
OM~
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TEORI
UHS
UNMZH
UV1
WOW
WUQ
Y6R
YFH
Z5R
ZCG
ZGI
ZY1
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
PKN
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-26af619b2c50734acf3b92dadc79d8f09902a81f89fd414248ae53d01df36a993
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0190-9622
1097-6787
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 09:51:36 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:51:49 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:57:08 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:33:47 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:23:42 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:50 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:36:37 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords CO 2
laser resurfacing
wound healing
BTE
erythema
crusting
Biafine Topical Emulsion
scabbing
AHO
postprocedural wound care
Aquaphor Healing Ointment
epithelial confluence
carbon dioxide
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c461t-26af619b2c50734acf3b92dadc79d8f09902a81f89fd414248ae53d01df36a993
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 21247664
PQID 853994213
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_853994213
pubmed_primary_21247664
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2010_11_014
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jaad_2010_11_014
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jaad_2010_11_014
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0190962210021146
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jaad_2010_11_014
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Am Acad Dermatol
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher Mosby, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Mosby, Inc
References Hantash, Bedi, Chan, Zachary (bib12) 2007; 39
Hunzeker, Weiss, Geronemus (bib28) 2009; 29
Perez, Bank (bib18) 1998; 11
Atiyeh, Dham, Costagliola, Al-Amm, Belhaouari (bib17) 2004; 30
Nanni, Alster (bib5) 1998; 24
Brown, Leveriza-Oh, Phillips (bib15) 2010
Grema, Greve, Raulin (bib7) 2003; 32
Apfelberg (bib4) 1997; 38
Brightman, Brauer, Anolik, Weiss, Karen, Chapas (bib11) 2009; 27
Davis, Badiavas, Rendon-Pellerano, Pardo (bib33) 1999; 25
Goerge, Peukert, Bayer, Rütter (bib13) 2008; 23
Gotkin, Sarnoff, Cannarozzo, Sadick, Alexiades-Armenakas (bib14) 2009; 8
Fezza (bib30) 2006; 118
Grunebaum L, Baumann L, Murdock J, Bublik M, Kaufman J. 2790-nm cutaneous laser resurfacing for chest photodamage. Presented at: 30th Annual American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery Annual Conference; April 14-18, 2010; Phoenix, AZ. Poster 74.
Alster (bib21) 1999; 24
Rendon, Cardona, Benitez (bib24) 2008; 7
Doherty, Doherty, Markus, Markus (bib10) 2009; 25
Batra (bib27) 2004; 9
(bib25) 2009
Gordon, Khan, Khatri (bib20) 2007; 15
Fitzpatrick, Goldman, Satur, Tope (bib1) 1996; 132
Alster, Garg (bib2) 1996; 98
Manuskiatti, Fitzpatrick, Goldman (bib6) 1999; 40
Cohen, Jorizzo, Kircik (bib23) 2007; 5
Holmkvist, Rogers (bib19) 2000; 136
Apfelberg (bib3) 1997; 99
Christian, Behroozan, Moy (bib32) 2000; 26
Gold, Biron (bib26) 2008; 7
Reddy, Hantash (bib8) 2009; 27
Zitelli (bib16) 1987; 2
Park, Khalid, Graber, Fedok (bib31) 2010; 12
Khatri, Machado, Magro, Davenport (bib29) 2000; 2
Manstein, Herron, Sink, Tanner, Anderson (bib9) 2004; 34
Brightman (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib11) 2009; 27
Brown (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib15) 2010
Batra (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib27) 2004; 9
Goerge (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib13) 2008; 23
Alster (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib21) 1999; 24
Gold (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib26) 2008; 7
Zitelli (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib16) 1987; 2
Christian (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib32) 2000; 26
Gotkin (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib14) 2009; 8
Perez (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib18) 1998; 11
Atiyeh (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib17) 2004; 30
Doherty (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib10) 2009; 25
Manstein (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib9) 2004; 34
Hantash (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib12) 2007; 39
Davis (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib33) 1999; 25
Manuskiatti (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib6) 1999; 40
10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib22
Fezza (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib30) 2006; 118
Park (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib31) 2010; 12
Holmkvist (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib19) 2000; 136
Apfelberg (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib3) 1997; 99
Alster (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib2) 1996; 98
Reddy (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib8) 2009; 27
Fitzpatrick (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib1) 1996; 132
Grema (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib7) 2003; 32
Gordon (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib20) 2007; 15
Rendon (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib24) 2008; 7
(10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib25) 2009
Hunzeker (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib28) 2009; 29
Nanni (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib5) 1998; 24
Khatri (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib29) 2000; 2
Apfelberg (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib4) 1997; 38
Cohen (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib23) 2007; 5
References_xml – reference: Grunebaum L, Baumann L, Murdock J, Bublik M, Kaufman J. 2790-nm cutaneous laser resurfacing for chest photodamage. Presented at: 30th Annual American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery Annual Conference; April 14-18, 2010; Phoenix, AZ. Poster 74.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 18
  year: 2004
  end-page: 25
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Moist exposed therapy: an effective and valid alternative to occlusive dressings for postlaser resurfacing wound care
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
– volume: 15
  start-page: 185
  year: 2007
  end-page: 189
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Erbium:YAG laser resurfacing using a novel portable device
  publication-title: Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am
– volume: 25
  start-page: 387
  year: 1999
  end-page: 393
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Histological comparison of postoperative wound care regimens for laser resurfacing in a porcine model
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
– volume: 39
  start-page: 87
  year: 2007
  end-page: 95
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Ex vivo histological characterization of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
– volume: 136
  start-page: 725
  year: 2000
  end-page: 731
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Treatment of perioral rhytides: a comparison of dermabrasion and superpulsed carbon dioxide laser
  publication-title: Arch Dermatol
– volume: 11
  start-page: 27
  year: 1998
  end-page: 34
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Facial skin resurfacing with the erbium:YAG laser: new findings
  publication-title: Cosmet Dermatol
– volume: 2
  start-page: 119
  year: 2000
  end-page: 123
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Laser peel: facial rejuvenation with a superficial erbium:YAG laser treatment
  publication-title: J Cutan Laser Ther
– volume: 26
  start-page: 32
  year: 2000
  end-page: 36
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Delayed infections following full-face CO
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
– volume: 38
  start-page: 95
  year: 1997
  end-page: 100
  ident: bib4
  article-title: A critical appraisal of high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser facial resurfacing for acne scars
  publication-title: Ann Plast Surg
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 9
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Use of a topical emulsion for wound healing
  publication-title: J Support Oncol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 317
  year: 2009
  end-page: 322
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Fractionated CO
  publication-title: Aesthet Surg J
– volume: 27
  start-page: 521
  year: 2009
  end-page: 527
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Emerging technologies in aesthetic medicine
  publication-title: Dermatol Clin
– volume: 24
  start-page: 87
  year: 1999
  end-page: 92
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Clinical and histologic evaluation of six erbium:YAG lasers for cutaneous resurfacing
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
– volume: 98
  start-page: 791
  year: 1996
  end-page: 794
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Treatment of facial rhytides with a high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 34
  start-page: 426
  year: 2004
  end-page: 438
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
– start-page: 115
  year: 2010
  end-page: 134
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Wound healing and its impact on dressings and postoperative care
  publication-title: Surgery of the skin
– volume: 7
  start-page: S23
  year: 2008
  end-page: S28
  ident: bib24
  article-title: The safety and efficacy of trolamine/sodium alginate topical emulsion in postlaser resurfacing wounds
  publication-title: J Drugs Dermatol
– volume: 40
  start-page: 401
  year: 1999
  end-page: 411
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Long-term effectiveness and side effects of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing for photoaged facial skin
  publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1217
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1221
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Laserbrasion: the combination of carbon dioxide laser and dermasanding
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 7
  start-page: S12
  year: 2008
  end-page: S18
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Trolamine/sodium alginate topical emulsion versus petrolatum for healing after tattoo removal
  publication-title: J Drugs Dermatol
– volume: 25
  start-page: 245
  year: 2009
  end-page: 251
  ident: bib10
  article-title: A paradigm for facial skin rejuvenation
  publication-title: Facial Plast Surg
– volume: 32
  start-page: 405
  year: 2003
  end-page: 412
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Facial rhytides–subsurfacing or resurfacing? A review
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
– volume: 8
  start-page: 138
  year: 2009
  end-page: 144
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Ablative skin resurfacing with a novel microablative CO
  publication-title: J Drugs Dermatol
– year: 2009
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Biafine topical emulsion
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1817
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1825
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser with CPG scanner for full-face resurfacing for rhytids, photoaging, and acne scars
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 132
  start-page: 395
  year: 1996
  end-page: 402
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged facial skin
  publication-title: Arch Dermatol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 315
  year: 1998
  end-page: 320
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Complications of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing: an evaluation of 500 patients
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
– volume: 23
  start-page: 93
  year: 2008
  end-page: 98
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Ablative fractional photothermolysis–a novel step in skin resurfacing
  publication-title: Med Laser Appl
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  year: 2004
  end-page: 6
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Ablative laser resurfacing-postoperative care
  publication-title: Skin Therapy Lett
– volume: 27
  start-page: 479
  year: 2009
  end-page: 489
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Ablative and fractional ablative lasers
  publication-title: Dermatol Clin
– volume: 2
  start-page: 243
  year: 1987
  end-page: 267
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Wound healing for the clinician
  publication-title: Adv Dermatol
– volume: 12
  start-page: 65
  year: 2010
  end-page: 67
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Current trends in facial resurfacing: a survey of American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery members
  publication-title: Arch Facial Plast Surg
– year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib25
– volume: 32
  start-page: 405
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib7
  article-title: Facial rhytides–subsurfacing or resurfacing? A review
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
  doi: 10.1002/lsm.10172
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1
  issue: Suppl
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib23
  article-title: Use of a topical emulsion for wound healing
  publication-title: J Support Oncol
– start-page: 115
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib15
  article-title: Wound healing and its impact on dressings and postoperative care
– volume: 25
  start-page: 245
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib10
  article-title: A paradigm for facial skin rejuvenation
  publication-title: Facial Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242036
– volume: 39
  start-page: 87
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib12
  article-title: Ex vivo histological characterization of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
  doi: 10.1002/lsm.20405
– volume: 30
  start-page: 18
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib17
  article-title: Moist exposed therapy: an effective and valid alternative to occlusive dressings for postlaser resurfacing wound care
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
  doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30006.x
– volume: 34
  start-page: 426
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib9
  article-title: Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
  doi: 10.1002/lsm.20048
– ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib22
– volume: 7
  start-page: S12
  issue: Suppl
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib26
  article-title: Trolamine/sodium alginate topical emulsion versus petrolatum for healing after tattoo removal
  publication-title: J Drugs Dermatol
– volume: 136
  start-page: 725
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib19
  article-title: Treatment of perioral rhytides: a comparison of dermabrasion and superpulsed carbon dioxide laser
  publication-title: Arch Dermatol
  doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.6.725
– volume: 25
  start-page: 387
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib33
  article-title: Histological comparison of postoperative wound care regimens for laser resurfacing in a porcine model
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
  doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08116.x
– volume: 27
  start-page: 521
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib8
  article-title: Emerging technologies in aesthetic medicine
  publication-title: Dermatol Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.det.2009.08.004
– volume: 2
  start-page: 243
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib16
  article-title: Wound healing for the clinician
  publication-title: Adv Dermatol
– volume: 2
  start-page: 119
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib29
  article-title: Laser peel: facial rejuvenation with a superficial erbium:YAG laser treatment
  publication-title: J Cutan Laser Ther
  doi: 10.1080/14628830050516353
– volume: 40
  start-page: 401
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib6
  article-title: Long-term effectiveness and side effects of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing for photoaged facial skin
  publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol
  doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70489-5
– volume: 38
  start-page: 95
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib4
  article-title: A critical appraisal of high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser facial resurfacing for acne scars
  publication-title: Ann Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000637-199702000-00001
– volume: 8
  start-page: 138
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib14
  article-title: Ablative skin resurfacing with a novel microablative CO2 laser
  publication-title: J Drugs Dermatol
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1817
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib3
  article-title: Ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser with CPG scanner for full-face resurfacing for rhytids, photoaging, and acne scars
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199706000-00003
– volume: 24
  start-page: 87
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib21
  article-title: Clinical and histologic evaluation of six erbium:YAG lasers for cutaneous resurfacing
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1999)24:2<87::AID-LSM3>3.0.CO;2-P
– volume: 27
  start-page: 479
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib11
  article-title: Ablative and fractional ablative lasers
  publication-title: Dermatol Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.det.2009.08.009
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib27
  article-title: Ablative laser resurfacing-postoperative care
  publication-title: Skin Therapy Lett
– volume: 98
  start-page: 791
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib2
  article-title: Treatment of facial rhytides with a high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199610000-00005
– volume: 11
  start-page: 27
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib18
  article-title: Facial skin resurfacing with the erbium:YAG laser: new findings
  publication-title: Cosmet Dermatol
– volume: 7
  start-page: S23
  issue: Suppl
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib24
  article-title: The safety and efficacy of trolamine/sodium alginate topical emulsion in postlaser resurfacing wounds
  publication-title: J Drugs Dermatol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 32
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib32
  article-title: Delayed infections following full-face CO2 laser resurfacing and occlusive dressing use
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
  doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99042.x
– volume: 23
  start-page: 93
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib13
  article-title: Ablative fractional photothermolysis–a novel step in skin resurfacing
  publication-title: Med Laser Appl
  doi: 10.1016/j.mla.2008.02.002
– volume: 15
  start-page: 185
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib20
  article-title: Erbium:YAG laser resurfacing using a novel portable device
  publication-title: Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2007.01.007
– volume: 24
  start-page: 315
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib5
  article-title: Complications of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing: an evaluation of 500 patients
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S1076-0512(97)00510-4
– volume: 29
  start-page: 317
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib28
  article-title: Fractionated CO2 laser resurfacing: our experience with more than 2000 treatments
  publication-title: Aesthet Surg J
  doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2009.05.004
– volume: 12
  start-page: 65
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib31
  article-title: Current trends in facial resurfacing: a survey of American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery members
  publication-title: Arch Facial Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2009.97
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1217
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib30
  article-title: Laserbrasion: the combination of carbon dioxide laser and dermasanding
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000220464.91795.07
– volume: 132
  start-page: 395
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014_bib1
  article-title: Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged facial skin
  publication-title: Arch Dermatol
  doi: 10.1001/archderm.1996.03890280047007
SSID ssj0009437
Score 2.1162527
Snippet Currently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and reduce...
Background Currently, there is no standard of care for postlaser resurfacing treatment of the face. Ideally, treatment should speed re-epithelialization and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage S36
SubjectTerms Aged
Aquaphor Healing Ointment
Biafine Topical Emulsion
crusting
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
Dermatology
Double-Blind Method
Emulsions - therapeutic use
epithelial confluence
Equipment and Supplies
erythema
Face - surgery
Female
Humans
laser resurfacing
Laser Therapy
Lipids - therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Ointments - therapeutic use
Petrolatum - therapeutic use
postprocedural wound care
Rhytidoplasty - methods
scabbing
Wound Healing
Title A comparison of wound healing between a skin protectant ointment and a medical device topical emulsion after laser resurfacing of the perioral area
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0190962210021146
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0190962210021146
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.014
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21247664
https://www.proquest.com/docview/853994213
Volume 64
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYhhdJLSd_bpGEOvRV3V7L8Oi6hYduSXNpAbmJWD9g0sZd4l97yJ_KHM2PLLqVNCr0YbEbI1oxGn6z5ZoR4720lfVb4pCxDkWiFswSzEmnGO6nyKrNFxUThk9N8caa_nGfnO-Jo4MJwWGX0_b1P77x1fDKNozldr1bTb8yCrnKlOIkoc2uZwa4LtvKPN7_CPCqdjpRplo7EmT7G6wLR9eFdnMlT6vsWp_vAZ7cIHe-JpxE9wrx_wWdix9fPxeOTeD7-QtzOwY6FBaEJ8JOrJgGjQVqiIAZlAUL7Y1VDzNFAYwvNqu7CzQFJHOGqP74B59mRwKZZd7f-anvJf9egqywOBLzpSvv17XVAyx1QjwQogbMnM_MfkCDpS3F2_On70SKJZRcSq3O5SVSOgbZVS2UJK6YabUiXlXLoSG-uDHySprCUoayC00yUK9FnqZtJF9IcCe-8Ert1U_s3Ajx5AwzOc1IfTbovA-GTalkhyVmduomQw3gbG3OSc2mMSzMEn10Y1pFhHdFmxZCOJuLD2GbdZ-R4UDod1GgGril5R0MLxoOtir-18m2c4K2RplVmZv4wwonIxpa_2fE_e4TBxgxNcD61wdo329aUnDtYK5lOxOve9sbPJthBBp_rt__Z6b540v8i55C6A7G7ud76d4SxNsvDbhIdikfzz18Xp3cfJyWA
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LaxsxEB5SB9pcSt9xn3PorSy2tNrX0YQGp4l9aQK5CXklgdNk12Rt-kP6hzuzq91S2qTQi8FGg7waafRpNd83AB9dWQiXZC7Kc59FSpppZJLc0Iq3QqZFUmYFE4UXy3R-ob5cJpd7cNRzYTitMsT-Lqa30Tr8MgmjOdms15OvzIIuUilZRJS5tQ9gn9WpkhHsz05O58tf2rsqHljTbBC4M12a15UxtsvwYjFPoe7an-7Cn-0-dPwEHgcAibPuPz6FPVc9g4eLcEX-HH7MsBxqC2Lt8TsXTkIGhLRLYcjLQoPNt3WFQaaBhhfrddVmnKOh5gZvuhsctI5jCW7rTfvV3eyu-QUbtsXFkbA3fdKRfXfrTckdUI-EKZEFlJn8j4ZQ6Qu4OP58fjSPQuWFqFSp2EYyNZ5OVitZElyMlSl9vCqkNZZcZ3PPl2nS5MLnhbeKuXK5cUlsp8L6ODUEeV7CqKordwjoKCAYbx3r-ihyf-4JohSrwlC7UsV2DKIfb10GWXKujnGt-_yzK80-0uwjOq9o8tEYPg02m06U497Wce9G3dNNKUBq2jPutcr-ZuWasMYbLXQj9VT_MQ_HkAyWv03lf_aI_RzTtMb54sZUrt41Omf5YCVFPIZX3dwbHpuQh8rSVL3-z04_wKP5-eJMn50sT9_AQffGnDPs3sJoe7tz7whybVfvw5L6CRhQKDE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparison+of+wound+healing+between+a+skin+protectant+ointment+and+a+medical+device+topical+emulsion+after+laser+resurfacing+of+the+perioral+area&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Academy+of+Dermatology&rft.au=Sarnoff%2C+Deborah+S.&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.pub=Mosby%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=S36&rft.epage=S43&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jaad.2010.11.014&rft.externalDocID=S0190962210021146
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F01909622%2FS0190962211X00026%2Fcov150h.gif