Taxonomy based on limited genomic markers may underestimate species diversity of rockhopper penguins and threaten their conservation

• Published in: Diversity & distributions Vol. 27; no. 11; pp. 2277 - 2296
• Main Authors: Frugone, María José, Cole, Theresa L., López, María Eugenia, Clucas, Gemma, Matos-Maraví, Pável, Lois, Nicolás A., Pistorius, Pierre, Bonadonna, Francesco, Trathan, Phil, Polanowski, Andrea, Wienecke, Barbara, Raya-Rey, Andrea, Pütz, Klemens, Steinfurth, Antje, Bi, Ke, Wang-Claypool, Cynthia Y., Waters, Jonathan M., Bowie, Rauri C. K., Poulin, Elie, Vianna, Juliana A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Wiley 01.11.2021; John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subjects: Animal genetics; Aquatic birds; Biodiversity; Biological evolution; Biological Systematics; Biologisk systematik; Biomarkers; Coastal zone; Conservation; conspecificity; Cryptic species; Differentiation; Discordance; Divergence; DNA; DNA sequencing; Eudyptes; Eudyptes chrysocome; Eudyptes chrysocome filholi; Eudyptes chrysocome moseleyi; Evaluation; Gene flow; Genetic markers; genetic variation; Genetics; genome; Genomes; Genomics; Hypotheses; Life Sciences; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial DNA; Mutation; Penguins; Population; Population genetics; Populations and Evolution; RESEARCH ARTICLE; rockhopper penguins; seabirds; Southern Hemisphere; Speciation; species delimitation; Species diversity; Taxa; Taxonomy; rockhopper penguins; species delimitation; genomics; Eudyptes
• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13399
• ISSN: 1366-9516; 1472-4642

Aim Delimiting recently diverged species is challenging. During speciation, genetic differentiation may be distributed unevenly across the genome, as different genomic regions can be subject to different selective pressures and evolutionary histories. Reliance on limited numbers of genetic markers that may be underpowered can make species delimitation even more challenging, potentially resulting in taxonomic inconsistencies. Rockhopper penguins of the genus Eudyptes comprise three broadly recognized taxa: northern (E. moseleyi), southern (E. chrysocome) and eastern rockhopper (E. filholi). Their taxonomic status has been controversial for decades, with researchers disagreeing about whether E. chrysocome and E. filholi are distinct species or conspecific. Our goal is to evaluate genome‐wide patterns of divergence to evaluate genetic differentiation and species delimitation in rockhopper penguins, and to assess which mechanisms may underlie previous discordance among nuclear versus mitochondrial analyses. Location Sub‐Antarctic and temperate coastal regions of the Southern Hemisphere. Methods We generated reduced‐representation genomic libraries using double digest restriction‐site associated DNA (ddRAD) sequencing to evaluate genetic differentiation, contemporary migration rates and admixture among colonies of rockhopper penguins. Results The extent of genetic differentiation among the three taxa was consistently higher than population‐level genetic differentiation found within these and other penguin species. There was no evidence of admixture among the three taxa, suggesting the absence of ongoing gene flow among them. Species delimitation analyses based on molecular data, along with other lines of evidence, provide strong support for the taxonomic distinction of three species of rockhopper penguins. Main conclusions Our results provide strong support for the existence of three distinct species of rockhopper penguins. The recognition of this taxonomic diversity is crucial for the management and conservation of this widely distributed species group. This study illustrates that widespread dispersive seabird lineages lacking obvious morphological differences may nevertheless have complex evolutionary histories and comprise cryptic species diversity.