Neurofilament light levels predict clinical progression and death in multiple system atrophy
Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegen...
Saved in:
Published in | Brain (London, England : 1878) Vol. 145; no. 12; pp. 4398 - 4408 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Oxford University Press
19.12.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection.
In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels.
We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone.
In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialed in multiple system atrophy (MSA). Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data in multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in MSA. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in multicentre European set-up. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; ROC analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease NfL levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival, and degree of brain atrophy than the NfL rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression, and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents. In this large multiple system atrophy cohort, Chelban et al. show that plasma NfL correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis, and could help inform patient stratification and monitor treatment responses in future trials of putative disease-modifying agents. Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents. Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents. Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents. Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents. Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents. In this large multiple system atrophy cohort, Chelban et al. show that plasma NfL correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis, and could help inform patient stratification and monitor treatment responses in future trials of putative disease-modifying agents. |
Author | Vijiaratnam, Nirosen Nikram, Elham Kobylecki, Christopher Segura, Barbara Massey, Luke Wilke, Carlo Wellington, Henny Chelban, Viorica Schöls, Ludger Pavese, Nicola Gonzalez, Mariel Péran, Patrice Senkevich, Konstantin Foltynie, Tom Heslegrave, Amanda J Jabbari, Edwin Perez-Soriano, Alexandra Le Traon, Anne Pavy Leigh, P Nigel Rowe, James B Jaunmuktane, Zane Painous, Celia Meissner, Wassilios G Tariq, Ambreen Compta, Yaroslau Bocchetta, Martina Alikhwan, Sondos Pchelina, Sofya Guo, Tong Ng, Bai Lin Church, Alistair Synofzik, Matthis Todd, Emily G Hu, Michele T M Burn, David J Zhelcheska, Kristina Marti, Maria J Zetterberg, Henrik Rohrer, Jonathan D Muñoz, Esteban Foubert-Samier, Alexandra Wood, Nicholas Junque, Carme Morris, Huw R Houlden, Henry Rascol, Olivier Costantini, Alyssa A Olufodun, Simisola Laurens, Brice |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Viorica orcidid: 0000-0002-7797-0756 surname: Chelban fullname: Chelban, Viorica – sequence: 2 givenname: Elham surname: Nikram fullname: Nikram, Elham – sequence: 3 givenname: Alexandra surname: Perez-Soriano fullname: Perez-Soriano, Alexandra – sequence: 4 givenname: Carlo orcidid: 0000-0002-7250-8597 surname: Wilke fullname: Wilke, Carlo – sequence: 5 givenname: Alexandra surname: Foubert-Samier fullname: Foubert-Samier, Alexandra – sequence: 6 givenname: Nirosen orcidid: 0000-0002-9671-0212 surname: Vijiaratnam fullname: Vijiaratnam, Nirosen – sequence: 7 givenname: Tong surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Tong – sequence: 8 givenname: Edwin orcidid: 0000-0001-6844-882X surname: Jabbari fullname: Jabbari, Edwin – sequence: 9 givenname: Simisola surname: Olufodun fullname: Olufodun, Simisola – sequence: 10 givenname: Mariel surname: Gonzalez fullname: Gonzalez, Mariel – sequence: 11 givenname: Konstantin surname: Senkevich fullname: Senkevich, Konstantin – sequence: 12 givenname: Brice surname: Laurens fullname: Laurens, Brice – sequence: 13 givenname: Patrice orcidid: 0000-0001-7200-0139 surname: Péran fullname: Péran, Patrice – sequence: 14 givenname: Olivier surname: Rascol fullname: Rascol, Olivier – sequence: 15 givenname: Anne Pavy surname: Le Traon fullname: Le Traon, Anne Pavy – sequence: 16 givenname: Emily G orcidid: 0000-0003-1551-5691 surname: Todd fullname: Todd, Emily G – sequence: 17 givenname: Alyssa A surname: Costantini fullname: Costantini, Alyssa A – sequence: 18 givenname: Sondos surname: Alikhwan fullname: Alikhwan, Sondos – sequence: 19 givenname: Ambreen surname: Tariq fullname: Tariq, Ambreen – sequence: 20 givenname: Bai Lin surname: Ng fullname: Ng, Bai Lin – sequence: 21 givenname: Esteban surname: Muñoz fullname: Muñoz, Esteban – sequence: 22 givenname: Celia surname: Painous fullname: Painous, Celia – sequence: 23 givenname: Yaroslau surname: Compta fullname: Compta, Yaroslau – sequence: 24 givenname: Carme surname: Junque fullname: Junque, Carme – sequence: 25 givenname: Barbara surname: Segura fullname: Segura, Barbara – sequence: 26 givenname: Kristina surname: Zhelcheska fullname: Zhelcheska, Kristina – sequence: 27 givenname: Henny surname: Wellington fullname: Wellington, Henny – sequence: 28 givenname: Ludger surname: Schöls fullname: Schöls, Ludger – sequence: 29 givenname: Zane surname: Jaunmuktane fullname: Jaunmuktane, Zane – sequence: 30 givenname: Christopher surname: Kobylecki fullname: Kobylecki, Christopher – sequence: 31 givenname: Alistair surname: Church fullname: Church, Alistair – sequence: 32 givenname: Michele T M surname: Hu fullname: Hu, Michele T M – sequence: 33 givenname: James B surname: Rowe fullname: Rowe, James B – sequence: 34 givenname: P Nigel surname: Leigh fullname: Leigh, P Nigel – sequence: 35 givenname: Luke surname: Massey fullname: Massey, Luke – sequence: 36 givenname: David J surname: Burn fullname: Burn, David J – sequence: 37 givenname: Nicola orcidid: 0000-0002-6801-6194 surname: Pavese fullname: Pavese, Nicola – sequence: 38 givenname: Tom orcidid: 0000-0003-0752-1813 surname: Foltynie fullname: Foltynie, Tom – sequence: 39 givenname: Sofya surname: Pchelina fullname: Pchelina, Sofya – sequence: 40 givenname: Nicholas surname: Wood fullname: Wood, Nicholas – sequence: 41 givenname: Amanda J surname: Heslegrave fullname: Heslegrave, Amanda J – sequence: 42 givenname: Henrik surname: Zetterberg fullname: Zetterberg, Henrik – sequence: 43 givenname: Martina orcidid: 0000-0003-1814-5024 surname: Bocchetta fullname: Bocchetta, Martina – sequence: 44 givenname: Jonathan D surname: Rohrer fullname: Rohrer, Jonathan D – sequence: 45 givenname: Maria J surname: Marti fullname: Marti, Maria J – sequence: 46 givenname: Matthis orcidid: 0000-0002-2280-7273 surname: Synofzik fullname: Synofzik, Matthis – sequence: 47 givenname: Huw R orcidid: 0000-0002-5473-3774 surname: Morris fullname: Morris, Huw R – sequence: 48 givenname: Wassilios G surname: Meissner fullname: Meissner, Wassilios G – sequence: 49 givenname: Henry orcidid: 0000-0002-2866-7777 surname: Houlden fullname: Houlden, Henry |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.science/hal-03817584$$DView record in HAL https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/320698$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
BookMark | eNp1kkFv1DAQhS1URLeFI1eUIxxC7Th24gtSVQFFWsEFbkiWY08SI8cOdrLV_nu87FJoJS629Py9Nx7NXKAzHzwg9JLgtwQLetVFZf2VulO6YvQJ2pCa47IijJ-hDcaYl61g-BxdpPQDY1LTij9D55QJTDFpNuj7Z1hj6K1TE_ilcHYY8wk7cKmYIxirl0I7661WLgthiJCSDb5Q3hQG1DIW1hfT6hY7OyjSPi0wFWqJYR73z9HTXrkEL073Jfr24f3Xm9ty--Xjp5vrbalrJpZSC4NFXStjuBGCqVZRBVg3fWdoQztW91ywirUdo63pSEXaqsMCcGcUrXHT0EtUHnPTHcxrJ-doJxX3Migrh3WWWRpWmUDSCnPRZv7dkc_wBEbnzqNyD2wPX7wd5RB2UjS8EjXJAW-OAeMj2-31Vh40TFvSsLbeHdjXp2Ix_FwhLXKySYNzykNYk6y44C2nx9hX__7rPvnPuP42qmNIKUJ_jxAsD-sgf6-DPK1D5ukjXttFLXl-uS3r_uP6BWIrvmE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2024_116771 crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_240007 crossref_primary_10_1159_000542922 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_023_00590_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_024_12647_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_024_12784_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11910_024_01335_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1474_4422_24_00396_X crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_023_00605_x crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_14558 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737159_2024_2403073 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_92173_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10286_023_00992_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_mds_29324 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10072_023_07056_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10286_023_00974_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12311_023_01583_9 crossref_primary_10_1080_0886022X_2024_2427178 crossref_primary_10_1002_mds_29680 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci15030241 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_023_01674_2 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_92173 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41582_024_00955_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2023_1210220 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arr_2024_102566 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10286_024_01061_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40035_023_00370_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2025_01_045 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_023_00481_5 crossref_primary_10_1080_17460794_2025_2480963 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41582_024_01034_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpn_2024_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_023_11741_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_025_12969_6 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30354-0 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003688 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.002 10.1002/mds.21614 10.1002/mds.20255 10.1136/jnnp-2018-320106 10.1038/s41467-021-23620-z 10.4103/0028-3886.79143 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117 10.1002/ana.25824 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30124-2 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70022-4 10.1136/jnnp.2006.103929 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat7108 10.1002/acn3.50972 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006318 10.1016/j.jns.2005.03.015 10.1515/cclm-2015-1195 10.1007/s00415-018-8893-9 10.1136/jnnp.52.Suppl.78 10.1038/s41591-018-0304-3 10.1148/radiol.2393050459 10.1038/s41598-020-76990-7 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00907.x 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309562 10.1212/WNL.54.3.697 10.1080/00365513.2020.1730434 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70288-1 10.1017/S1041610213002329 10.1093/brain/awl021 10.1038/s41582-018-0079-7 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003680 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.07.018 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70327-7 10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z 10.4061/2011/546871 10.1186/s12877-018-0951-8 10.15252/emmm.201911803 10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc2888 10.1002/mds.28847 10.1001/archneurol.2012.1654 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. Attribution The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. – notice: Attribution – notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM ADTPV AOWAS F1U |
DOI | 10.1093/brain/awac253 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1460-2156 |
EndPage | 4408 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_gup_ub_gu_se_320698 PMC9762941 oai_HAL_hal_03817584v1 35903017 10_1093_brain_awac253 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: MR/V034758/1 – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: MR/J004758/1 – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: MR/M023664/1 – fundername: Wellcome Trust grantid: WT104033/Z/14/Z – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: MR/M008525/1 – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: G1001253 – fundername: Parkinson's UK grantid: J-0901 – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: G0802760 – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: MR/S01165X/1 – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: MR/T046015/1 – fundername: ; |
GroupedDBID | --- -E4 -~X .2P .I3 .XZ .ZR 0R~ 1TH 23N 2WC 4.4 482 48X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 5WA 5WD 6PF 70D AABZA AACZT AAIMJ AAJKP AAMDB AAMVS AAOGV AAPNW AAPQZ AAPXW AARHZ AAUAY AAVAP AAVLN AAWTL AAYXX ABDFA ABEJV ABEUO ABGNP ABIVO ABIXL ABJNI ABKDP ABLJU ABMNT ABNHQ ABNKS ABPQP ABPTD ABQLI ABQNK ABVGC ABWST ABXVV ABXZS ABZBJ ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACUFI ACUTJ ACUTO ACYHN ADBBV ADEYI ADEZT ADGKP ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADNBA ADOCK ADQBN ADRTK ADVEK ADYVW ADZXQ AEGPL AEJOX AEKSI AELWJ AEMDU AEMQT AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFZL AFGWE AFIYH AFOFC AFXAL AFYAG AGINJ AGKEF AGORE AGQXC AGSYK AGUTN AHGBF AHMBA AHMMS AHXPO AIJHB AJBYB AJEEA AJNCP AKWXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC ALXQX APIBT APWMN ARIXL ATGXG AXUDD AYOIW BAWUL BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHONS BQDIO BR6 BSWAC BTRTY BVRKM C45 CDBKE CITATION COF CS3 CZ4 DAKXR DIK DILTD DU5 D~K E3Z EBS EE~ EMOBN ENERS F5P F9B FECEO FHSFR FLUFQ FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK GAUVT GJXCC GX1 H13 H5~ HAR HW0 HZ~ IOX J21 J5H JXSIZ KAQDR KOP KQ8 KSI KSN L7B M-Z MHKGH ML0 N9A NGC NLBLG NOMLY NOYVH O9- OAUYM OAWHX OBOKY OCZFY ODMLO OHH OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OPAEJ OVD OWPYF P2P PAFKI PEELM PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y R44 RD5 ROL ROX RUSNO RW1 RXO TCURE TEORI TJX TLC TR2 VVN W8F WH7 WOQ X7H YAYTL YKOAZ YSK YXANX ZKX ~91 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM KBUDW .55 .GJ 1CY 354 3O- 41~ AAGKA AAJQQ AAPGJ AAQQT AAUQX AAWDT AAYJJ ABDPE ABIME ABNGD ABPIB ABSMQ ABZEO ACBNA ACFRR ACPQN ACUKT ACVCV ACZBC ADMTO ADTPV AEHUL AEKPW AFFNX AFFQV AFSHK AGKRT AGMDO AGQPQ AI. AJDVS ANFBD AOWAS APJGH AQDSO AQKUS ASAOO ASPBG ATDFG ATTQO AVNTJ AVWKF AZFZN BZKNY C1A CAG CXTWN DFGAJ EIHJH EJD ELUNK F1U FEDTE HVGLF MBLQV MBTAY MVM N4W NTWIH NU- NVLIB O0~ OBFPC OHT O~Y PB- QBD RNI ROZ RZF RZO TCN TMA VH1 X7M XJT XOL YQJ ZCG ZGI ZKB ZXP |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c9d0944add6d995a8a3ae0c7fbd373b54f695258b538db12182b09e0bda340773 |
ISSN | 0006-8950 1460-2156 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 06:41:09 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:39:11 EDT 2025 Fri May 09 12:13:39 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 17:51:01 EDT 2025 Sat May 31 02:12:01 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:46:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:37 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Keywords | NfL MSA multiple system atrophy Multiple system atrophy |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c459t-c9d0944add6d995a8a3ae0c7fbd373b54f695258b538db12182b09e0bda340773 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 PMCID: PMC9762941 Huw R Morris, Wassilios G Meissner and Henry Houlden contributed equally to this work. |
ORCID | 0000-0003-0752-1813 0000-0002-5473-3774 0000-0003-1551-5691 0000-0002-2280-7273 0000-0002-7797-0756 0000-0001-7200-0139 0000-0002-9671-0212 0000-0002-6801-6194 0000-0002-2866-7777 0000-0002-7250-8597 0000-0003-1814-5024 0000-0001-6844-882X 0000-0002-1410-6397 |
OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9762941 |
PMID | 35903017 |
PQID | 2696863941 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_320698 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9762941 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03817584v1 proquest_miscellaneous_2696863941 pubmed_primary_35903017 crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awac253 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_brain_awac253 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-12-19 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-12-19 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2022 text: 2022-12-19 day: 19 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: US |
PublicationTitle | Brain (London, England : 1878) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Brain |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press |
References | Khalil (2022122116040735400_awac253-B8) 2018; 14 Kollensperger (2022122116040735400_awac253-B32) 2007; 22 Wenning (2022122116040735400_awac253-B40) 2013; 12 Jecmenica-Lukic (2022122116040735400_awac253-B2) 2012; 11 Steinacker (2022122116040735400_awac253-B24) 2018; 91 Nicoletti (2022122116040735400_awac253-B33) 2006; 239 Petzold (2022122116040735400_awac253-B35) 2005; 233 Trojanowski (2022122116040735400_awac253-B5) 2007; 33 Rodrigues (2022122116040735400_awac253-B28) 2020; 12 van der Ende (2022122116040735400_awac253-B25) 2019; 18 Pereira (2022122116040735400_awac253-B38) 2017; 58 Loh (2022122116040735400_awac253-B29) 2011; 59 Larner (2022122116040735400_awac253-B16) 2014; 26 Hampel (2022122116040735400_awac253-B39) 2018; 14 Wilke (2022122116040735400_awac253-B12) 2018; 265 Schrag (2022122116040735400_awac253-B34) 2000; 54 Wilke (2022122116040735400_awac253-B19) 2020; 12 Steinacker (2022122116040735400_awac253-B26) 2017; 88 Mattsson (2022122116040735400_awac253-B37) 2017; 74 Guevara (2022122116040735400_awac253-B30) 2016; 2016 Zhang (2022122116040735400_awac253-B36) 2011; 2011 Papapetropoulos (2022122116040735400_awac253-B4) 2007; 78 Stefanova (2022122116040735400_awac253-B3) 2009; 8 Kang (2022122116040735400_awac253-B15) 2018; 18 Byrne (2022122116040735400_awac253-B18) 2018; 10 Zhang (2022122116040735400_awac253-B22) 2022; 37 Gaetani (2022122116040735400_awac253-B7) 2019; 90 Gilman (2022122116040735400_awac253-B13) 2008; 71 Hansson (2022122116040735400_awac253-B9) 2017; 88 Magdalinou (2022122116040735400_awac253-B10) 2015; 86 Kuhle (2022122116040735400_awac253-B17) 2016; 54 Hall (2022122116040735400_awac253-B23) 2012; 69 Singer (2022122116040735400_awac253-B11) 2020; 88 Manouchehrinia (2022122116040735400_awac253-B42) 2020; 7 Ashton (2022122116040735400_awac253-B6) 2021; 12 Preische (2022122116040735400_awac253-B21) 2019; 25 Paviour (2022122116040735400_awac253-B31) 2006; 129 Byrne (2022122116040735400_awac253-B27) 2017; 16 Akamine (2022122116040735400_awac253-B43) 2020; 10 Wenning (2022122116040735400_awac253-B14) 2004; 19 Quinn (2022122116040735400_awac253-B1) 1989; 52 Andersson (2022122116040735400_awac253-B20) 2020; 95 Hviid (2022122116040735400_awac253-B41) 2020; 80 |
References_xml | – volume: 18 start-page: 1103 year: 2019 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B25 article-title: Serum neurofilament light chain in genetic frontotemporal dementia: A longitudinal, multicentre cohort study publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30354-0 – volume: 88 start-page: 961 year: 2017 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B26 article-title: Neurofilament as a blood marker for diagnosis and monitoring of primary progressive aphasias publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003688 – volume: 58 start-page: 14 year: 2017 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B38 article-title: Association between cerebrospinal fluid and plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers with brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease publication-title: Neurobiol Aging doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.002 – volume: 22 start-page: 1771 year: 2007 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B32 article-title: Diffusion weighted imaging best discriminates PD from MSA-P: A comparison with tilt table testing and heart MIBG scintigraphy publication-title: Mov Disord doi: 10.1002/mds.21614 – volume: 19 start-page: 1391 year: 2004 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B14 article-title: Development and validation of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) publication-title: Movement Disord doi: 10.1002/mds.20255 – volume: 90 start-page: 870 year: 2019 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B7 article-title: Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in neurological disorders publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-320106 – volume: 12 start-page: 3400 year: 2021 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B6 article-title: A multicentre validation study of the diagnostic value of plasma neurofilament light publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23620-z – volume: 59 start-page: 266 year: 2011 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B29 article-title: A Hot Cross Bun sign from diffusion tensor imaging and tractography perspective publication-title: Neurol India doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.79143 – volume: 74 start-page: 557 year: 2017 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B37 article-title: Association of plasma neurofilament light with neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease publication-title: JAMA Neurol doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117 – volume: 88 start-page: 503 year: 2020 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B11 article-title: Alpha-synuclein oligomers and neurofilament light chain in spinal fluid differentiate multiple system atrophy from Lewy body synucleinopathies publication-title: Ann Neurol doi: 10.1002/ana.25824 – volume: 16 start-page: 601 year: 2017 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B27 article-title: Neurofilament light protein in blood as a potential biomarker of neurodegeneration in Huntington’s disease: A retrospective cohort analysis publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30124-2 – volume: 11 start-page: 361 year: 2012 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B2 article-title: Premotor signs and symptoms of multiple system atrophy publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70022-4 – volume: 78 start-page: 327 year: 2007 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B4 article-title: Causes of death in multiple system atrophy publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.103929 – volume: 10 start-page: eaat7108 year: 2018 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B18 article-title: Evaluation of mutant huntingtin and neurofilament proteins as potential markers in Huntington’s disease publication-title: Sci Transl Med doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat7108 – volume: 7 start-page: 139 year: 2020 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B42 article-title: Confounding effect of blood volume and body mass index on blood neurofilament light chain levels publication-title: Ann Clin Transl Neurol doi: 10.1002/acn3.50972 – volume: 91 start-page: e1390 year: 2018 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B24 article-title: Serum neurofilament light chain in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006318 – volume: 233 start-page: 183 year: 2005 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B35 article-title: Neurofilament phosphoforms: Surrogate markers for axonal injury, degeneration and loss publication-title: J Neurol Sci doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.03.015 – volume: 54 start-page: 1655 year: 2016 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B17 article-title: Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-1195 – volume: 265 start-page: 1618 year: 2018 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B12 article-title: Serum neurofilament light is increased in multiple system atrophy of cerebellar type and in repeat-expansion spinocerebellar ataxias: A pilot study publication-title: J Neurol doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8893-9 – volume: 52 start-page: 78 year: 1989 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B1 article-title: Multiple system atrophy–The nature of the beast publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.Suppl.78 – volume: 25 start-page: 277 year: 2019 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B21 article-title: Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease publication-title: Nat Med doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0304-3 – volume: 239 start-page: 825 year: 2006 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B33 article-title: MR imaging of middle cerebellar peduncle width: Differentiation of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson disease publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393050459 – volume: 10 start-page: 20350 year: 2020 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B43 article-title: Renal function is associated with blood neurofilament light chain level in older adults publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76990-7 – volume: 33 start-page: 615 year: 2007 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B5 article-title: Proposed neuropathological criteria for the post mortem diagnosis of multiple system atrophy publication-title: Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00907.x – volume: 86 start-page: 1240 issue: 11 year: 2015 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B10 article-title: A panel of nine cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers may identify patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309562 – volume: 54 start-page: 697 year: 2000 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B34 article-title: Differentiation of atypical parkinsonian syndromes with routine MRI publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.54.3.697 – volume: 80 start-page: 291 year: 2020 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B41 article-title: Reference interval and preanalytical properties of serum neurofilament light chain in Scandinavian adults publication-title: Scand J Clin Lab Invest doi: 10.1080/00365513.2020.1730434 – volume: 8 start-page: 1172 year: 2009 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B3 article-title: Multiple system atrophy: An update publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70288-1 – volume: 26 start-page: 555 year: 2014 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B16 article-title: A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in the detection of dementia publication-title: Int Psychogeriatr doi: 10.1017/S1041610213002329 – volume: 129 start-page: 1040 year: 2006 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B31 article-title: Longitudinal MRI in progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy: Rates and regions of atrophy publication-title: Brain doi: 10.1093/brain/awl021 – volume: 14 start-page: 639 year: 2018 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B39 article-title: Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: Mapping the road to the clinic publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0079-7 – volume: 88 start-page: 930 year: 2017 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B9 article-title: Blood-based NfL: A biomarker for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorder publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003680 – volume: 95 start-page: 143 year: 2020 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B20 article-title: Blood and cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light differentially detect neurodegeneration in early Alzheimer’s disease publication-title: Neurobiol Aging doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.07.018 – volume: 12 start-page: 264 year: 2013 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B40 article-title: The natural history of multiple system atrophy: A prospective European cohort study publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70327-7 – volume: 14 start-page: 577 year: 2018 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B8 article-title: Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z – volume: 2011 start-page: 546871 year: 2011 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B36 article-title: Joint assessment of structural, perfusion, and diffusion MRI in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia publication-title: Int J Alzheimer’s Dis doi: 10.4061/2011/546871 – volume: 18 start-page: 261 year: 2018 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B15 article-title: Montreal cognitive assessment reflects cognitive reserve publication-title: BMC Geriatrics doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0951-8 – volume: 12 start-page: e11803 year: 2020 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B19 article-title: Neurofilaments in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: Blood biomarkers at the preataxic and ataxic stage in humans and mice publication-title: EMBO Mol Med doi: 10.15252/emmm.201911803 – volume: 71 start-page: 670 year: 2008 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B13 article-title: Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15 – volume: 12 start-page: eabc2888 year: 2020 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B28 article-title: Mutant huntingtin and neurofilament light have distinct longitudinal dynamics in Huntington’s disease publication-title: Sci Transl Med doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc2888 – volume: 37 start-page: 421 year: 2022 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B22 article-title: Neurofilament light chain predicts disease severity and progression in multiple system atrophy publication-title: Mov Disord doi: 10.1002/mds.28847 – volume: 69 start-page: 1445 year: 2012 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B23 article-title: Accuracy of a panel of 5 cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of patients with dementia and/or parkinsonian disorders publication-title: Arch Neurol doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.1654 – volume: 2016 start-page: 9631041 year: 2016 ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B30 article-title: Whole-brain atrophy rate in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy publication-title: Parkinson’s Dis |
SSID | ssj0014326 |
Score | 2.568699 |
Snippet | Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by... Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialed in multiple system atrophy (MSA). Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by... In this large multiple system atrophy cohort, Chelban et al. show that plasma NfL correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis, and... |
SourceID | swepub pubmedcentral hal proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 4398 |
SubjectTerms | association Biomarkers blood cerebrospinal-fluid chain Cohort Studies Cross-Sectional Studies diagnosis differentiation Disease Progression Humans Intermediate Filaments Life Sciences MSA Multiple System Atrophy neurodegeneration Neurofilament Proteins Neurons and Cognition Neurosciences Neurosciences & Neurology Neurovetenskaper NfL Original |
Title | Neurofilament light levels predict clinical progression and death in multiple system atrophy |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903017 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2696863941 https://hal.science/hal-03817584 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9762941 https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/320698 |
Volume | 145 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdrB2MvY99L94E2Rl86p7Ykf-ixhJbso3tZO_owMJIlL2bBKYnTQf_6nSRbjmkG3V6cYCtS0P1yuTvd_Q6h9yXTEU3KKChkkgSMFjzIlOmhkQrChSZE22Ywp1-T6Tn7dBFf9CUEtrqkkePiemtdyf9IFe6BXE2V7D9I1k8KN-A9yBeuIGG43krGjlmjAqGaE_258bMP5iYLaGVq_1VVNH3lo03EciQc9sBAGdvPRDt8SqEjdT4wwfGOw9ozH4mq3tr8w0UUsjTbiChMZnouXVz1-7g_9_i1dNg7HvfqeKmvg28L2KnaVdv4R6CsXNbQZLwZlyC2RUqr_TpdmwQZd7SyXtc67sgOVGRDdYJllG3V6Y7vSi5tpORE_BYFcfzCW4iyf64v87WEl3ylc0rChGc76C4BF8K62x8_-xMmRm0rPv8tW_5VWOzQLnXYLjSwV3ZmJlv2pityM6N2wDtrbZWzh-hB62TgI4eYR-iOrh-je6dtGsUT9GMAHGyBgx1wcAsc3AEHbwAHg8SxBQ6uatwBBzvg4BY4T9H5yfHZZBq0bTaCgsW8CQquwMdnwvQW4zwWmaBCh0VaSkVTKmNWJjwmcSbhv1HJyFD-y5DrUCpBWZim9BnarRe1foEwFSKmiodM64hJLUUE9iUpw0SRgjDFR-hDt5l50XLQm1Yo89zlQtDc7n3e7v0I7fvhl4585W8D34Fk_BiDhOnRl9zcsxSUYGVfRSP0thNcDjrUHIyJWi_Wq5wYhigw1RmMee4E6eeiMTdRg3SE0oGIB4sNn9TVzPK0g6VP7Jz7DgyDj2xB6t5tB75E9_tf3Cu02yzX-jXYxo18Y0H-B4UkwbM |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neurofilament+light+levels+predict+clinical+progression+and+death+in+multiple+system+atrophy&rft.jtitle=Brain+%28London%2C+England+%3A+1878%29&rft.au=Chelban%2C+V.&rft.au=Nikram%2C+E.&rft.au=Perez-Soriano%2C+A.&rft.au=Wilke%2C+C.&rft.date=2022-12-19&rft.issn=0006-8950&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fbrain%2Fawac253&rft.externalDocID=oai_gup_ub_gu_se_320698 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-8950&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-8950&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-8950&client=summon |