Neurofilament light levels predict clinical progression and death in multiple system atrophy

Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain (London, England : 1878) Vol. 145; no. 12; pp. 4398 - 4408
Main Authors Chelban, Viorica, Nikram, Elham, Perez-Soriano, Alexandra, Wilke, Carlo, Foubert-Samier, Alexandra, Vijiaratnam, Nirosen, Guo, Tong, Jabbari, Edwin, Olufodun, Simisola, Gonzalez, Mariel, Senkevich, Konstantin, Laurens, Brice, Péran, Patrice, Rascol, Olivier, Le Traon, Anne Pavy, Todd, Emily G, Costantini, Alyssa A, Alikhwan, Sondos, Tariq, Ambreen, Ng, Bai Lin, Muñoz, Esteban, Painous, Celia, Compta, Yaroslau, Junque, Carme, Segura, Barbara, Zhelcheska, Kristina, Wellington, Henny, Schöls, Ludger, Jaunmuktane, Zane, Kobylecki, Christopher, Church, Alistair, Hu, Michele T M, Rowe, James B, Leigh, P Nigel, Massey, Luke, Burn, David J, Pavese, Nicola, Foltynie, Tom, Pchelina, Sofya, Wood, Nicholas, Heslegrave, Amanda J, Zetterberg, Henrik, Bocchetta, Martina, Rohrer, Jonathan D, Marti, Maria J, Synofzik, Matthis, Morris, Huw R, Meissner, Wassilios G, Houlden, Henry
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 19.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.
AbstractList Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialed in multiple system atrophy (MSA). Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data in multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in MSA. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in multicentre European set-up. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; ROC analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease NfL levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival, and degree of brain atrophy than the NfL rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression, and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.
In this large multiple system atrophy cohort, Chelban et al. show that plasma NfL correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis, and could help inform patient stratification and monitor treatment responses in future trials of putative disease-modifying agents. Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.
Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.
Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.
Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.
Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents. In this large multiple system atrophy cohort, Chelban et al. show that plasma NfL correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis, and could help inform patient stratification and monitor treatment responses in future trials of putative disease-modifying agents.
Author Vijiaratnam, Nirosen
Nikram, Elham
Kobylecki, Christopher
Segura, Barbara
Massey, Luke
Wilke, Carlo
Wellington, Henny
Chelban, Viorica
Schöls, Ludger
Pavese, Nicola
Gonzalez, Mariel
Péran, Patrice
Senkevich, Konstantin
Foltynie, Tom
Heslegrave, Amanda J
Jabbari, Edwin
Perez-Soriano, Alexandra
Le Traon, Anne Pavy
Leigh, P Nigel
Rowe, James B
Jaunmuktane, Zane
Painous, Celia
Meissner, Wassilios G
Tariq, Ambreen
Compta, Yaroslau
Bocchetta, Martina
Alikhwan, Sondos
Pchelina, Sofya
Guo, Tong
Ng, Bai Lin
Church, Alistair
Synofzik, Matthis
Todd, Emily G
Hu, Michele T M
Burn, David J
Zhelcheska, Kristina
Marti, Maria J
Zetterberg, Henrik
Rohrer, Jonathan D
Muñoz, Esteban
Foubert-Samier, Alexandra
Wood, Nicholas
Junque, Carme
Morris, Huw R
Houlden, Henry
Rascol, Olivier
Costantini, Alyssa A
Olufodun, Simisola
Laurens, Brice
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Viorica
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7797-0756
  surname: Chelban
  fullname: Chelban, Viorica
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Elham
  surname: Nikram
  fullname: Nikram, Elham
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Alexandra
  surname: Perez-Soriano
  fullname: Perez-Soriano, Alexandra
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Carlo
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7250-8597
  surname: Wilke
  fullname: Wilke, Carlo
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Alexandra
  surname: Foubert-Samier
  fullname: Foubert-Samier, Alexandra
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Nirosen
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9671-0212
  surname: Vijiaratnam
  fullname: Vijiaratnam, Nirosen
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Tong
  surname: Guo
  fullname: Guo, Tong
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Edwin
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6844-882X
  surname: Jabbari
  fullname: Jabbari, Edwin
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Simisola
  surname: Olufodun
  fullname: Olufodun, Simisola
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Mariel
  surname: Gonzalez
  fullname: Gonzalez, Mariel
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Konstantin
  surname: Senkevich
  fullname: Senkevich, Konstantin
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Brice
  surname: Laurens
  fullname: Laurens, Brice
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Patrice
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7200-0139
  surname: Péran
  fullname: Péran, Patrice
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Olivier
  surname: Rascol
  fullname: Rascol, Olivier
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Anne Pavy
  surname: Le Traon
  fullname: Le Traon, Anne Pavy
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Emily G
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1551-5691
  surname: Todd
  fullname: Todd, Emily G
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Alyssa A
  surname: Costantini
  fullname: Costantini, Alyssa A
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Sondos
  surname: Alikhwan
  fullname: Alikhwan, Sondos
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Ambreen
  surname: Tariq
  fullname: Tariq, Ambreen
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Bai Lin
  surname: Ng
  fullname: Ng, Bai Lin
– sequence: 21
  givenname: Esteban
  surname: Muñoz
  fullname: Muñoz, Esteban
– sequence: 22
  givenname: Celia
  surname: Painous
  fullname: Painous, Celia
– sequence: 23
  givenname: Yaroslau
  surname: Compta
  fullname: Compta, Yaroslau
– sequence: 24
  givenname: Carme
  surname: Junque
  fullname: Junque, Carme
– sequence: 25
  givenname: Barbara
  surname: Segura
  fullname: Segura, Barbara
– sequence: 26
  givenname: Kristina
  surname: Zhelcheska
  fullname: Zhelcheska, Kristina
– sequence: 27
  givenname: Henny
  surname: Wellington
  fullname: Wellington, Henny
– sequence: 28
  givenname: Ludger
  surname: Schöls
  fullname: Schöls, Ludger
– sequence: 29
  givenname: Zane
  surname: Jaunmuktane
  fullname: Jaunmuktane, Zane
– sequence: 30
  givenname: Christopher
  surname: Kobylecki
  fullname: Kobylecki, Christopher
– sequence: 31
  givenname: Alistair
  surname: Church
  fullname: Church, Alistair
– sequence: 32
  givenname: Michele T M
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Michele T M
– sequence: 33
  givenname: James B
  surname: Rowe
  fullname: Rowe, James B
– sequence: 34
  givenname: P Nigel
  surname: Leigh
  fullname: Leigh, P Nigel
– sequence: 35
  givenname: Luke
  surname: Massey
  fullname: Massey, Luke
– sequence: 36
  givenname: David J
  surname: Burn
  fullname: Burn, David J
– sequence: 37
  givenname: Nicola
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6801-6194
  surname: Pavese
  fullname: Pavese, Nicola
– sequence: 38
  givenname: Tom
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0752-1813
  surname: Foltynie
  fullname: Foltynie, Tom
– sequence: 39
  givenname: Sofya
  surname: Pchelina
  fullname: Pchelina, Sofya
– sequence: 40
  givenname: Nicholas
  surname: Wood
  fullname: Wood, Nicholas
– sequence: 41
  givenname: Amanda J
  surname: Heslegrave
  fullname: Heslegrave, Amanda J
– sequence: 42
  givenname: Henrik
  surname: Zetterberg
  fullname: Zetterberg, Henrik
– sequence: 43
  givenname: Martina
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1814-5024
  surname: Bocchetta
  fullname: Bocchetta, Martina
– sequence: 44
  givenname: Jonathan D
  surname: Rohrer
  fullname: Rohrer, Jonathan D
– sequence: 45
  givenname: Maria J
  surname: Marti
  fullname: Marti, Maria J
– sequence: 46
  givenname: Matthis
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2280-7273
  surname: Synofzik
  fullname: Synofzik, Matthis
– sequence: 47
  givenname: Huw R
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5473-3774
  surname: Morris
  fullname: Morris, Huw R
– sequence: 48
  givenname: Wassilios G
  surname: Meissner
  fullname: Meissner, Wassilios G
– sequence: 49
  givenname: Henry
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2866-7777
  surname: Houlden
  fullname: Houlden, Henry
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://hal.science/hal-03817584$$DView record in HAL
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/320698$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNp1kkFv1DAQhS1URLeFI1eUIxxC7Th24gtSVQFFWsEFbkiWY08SI8cOdrLV_nu87FJoJS629Py9Nx7NXKAzHzwg9JLgtwQLetVFZf2VulO6YvQJ2pCa47IijJ-hDcaYl61g-BxdpPQDY1LTij9D55QJTDFpNuj7Z1hj6K1TE_ilcHYY8wk7cKmYIxirl0I7661WLgthiJCSDb5Q3hQG1DIW1hfT6hY7OyjSPi0wFWqJYR73z9HTXrkEL073Jfr24f3Xm9ty--Xjp5vrbalrJpZSC4NFXStjuBGCqVZRBVg3fWdoQztW91ywirUdo63pSEXaqsMCcGcUrXHT0EtUHnPTHcxrJ-doJxX3Migrh3WWWRpWmUDSCnPRZv7dkc_wBEbnzqNyD2wPX7wd5RB2UjS8EjXJAW-OAeMj2-31Vh40TFvSsLbeHdjXp2Ix_FwhLXKySYNzykNYk6y44C2nx9hX__7rPvnPuP42qmNIKUJ_jxAsD-sgf6-DPK1D5ukjXttFLXl-uS3r_uP6BWIrvmE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2024_116771
crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_240007
crossref_primary_10_1159_000542922
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_023_00590_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_024_12647_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_024_12784_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11910_024_01335_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1474_4422_24_00396_X
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_023_00605_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_14558
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737159_2024_2403073
crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_92173_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10286_023_00992_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_mds_29324
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10072_023_07056_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10286_023_00974_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12311_023_01583_9
crossref_primary_10_1080_0886022X_2024_2427178
crossref_primary_10_1002_mds_29680
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci15030241
crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_023_01674_2
crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_92173
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41582_024_00955_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2023_1210220
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arr_2024_102566
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10286_024_01061_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40035_023_00370_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2025_01_045
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_023_00481_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_17460794_2025_2480963
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41582_024_01034_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpn_2024_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_023_11741_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_025_12969_6
Cites_doi 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30354-0
10.1212/WNL.0000000000003688
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.002
10.1002/mds.21614
10.1002/mds.20255
10.1136/jnnp-2018-320106
10.1038/s41467-021-23620-z
10.4103/0028-3886.79143
10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117
10.1002/ana.25824
10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30124-2
10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70022-4
10.1136/jnnp.2006.103929
10.1126/scitranslmed.aat7108
10.1002/acn3.50972
10.1212/WNL.0000000000006318
10.1016/j.jns.2005.03.015
10.1515/cclm-2015-1195
10.1007/s00415-018-8893-9
10.1136/jnnp.52.Suppl.78
10.1038/s41591-018-0304-3
10.1148/radiol.2393050459
10.1038/s41598-020-76990-7
10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00907.x
10.1136/jnnp-2014-309562
10.1212/WNL.54.3.697
10.1080/00365513.2020.1730434
10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70288-1
10.1017/S1041610213002329
10.1093/brain/awl021
10.1038/s41582-018-0079-7
10.1212/WNL.0000000000003680
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.07.018
10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70327-7
10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z
10.4061/2011/546871
10.1186/s12877-018-0951-8
10.15252/emmm.201911803
10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15
10.1126/scitranslmed.abc2888
10.1002/mds.28847
10.1001/archneurol.2012.1654
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Attribution
The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
– notice: Attribution
– notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
ADTPV
AOWAS
F1U
DOI 10.1093/brain/awac253
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1460-2156
EndPage 4408
ExternalDocumentID oai_gup_ub_gu_se_320698
PMC9762941
oai_HAL_hal_03817584v1
35903017
10_1093_brain_awac253
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MR/V034758/1
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MR/J004758/1
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MR/M023664/1
– fundername: Wellcome Trust
  grantid: WT104033/Z/14/Z
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MR/M008525/1
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: G1001253
– fundername: Parkinson's UK
  grantid: J-0901
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: G0802760
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MR/S01165X/1
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: MR/T046015/1
– fundername: ;
GroupedDBID ---
-E4
-~X
.2P
.I3
.XZ
.ZR
0R~
1TH
23N
2WC
4.4
482
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
5WA
5WD
6PF
70D
AABZA
AACZT
AAIMJ
AAJKP
AAMDB
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAVAP
AAVLN
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABEUO
ABGNP
ABIVO
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABKDP
ABLJU
ABMNT
ABNHQ
ABNKS
ABPQP
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQNK
ABVGC
ABWST
ABXVV
ABXZS
ABZBJ
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ACYHN
ADBBV
ADEYI
ADEZT
ADGKP
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADNBA
ADOCK
ADQBN
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEJOX
AEKSI
AELWJ
AEMDU
AEMQT
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFZL
AFGWE
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFXAL
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGORE
AGQXC
AGSYK
AGUTN
AHGBF
AHMBA
AHMMS
AHXPO
AIJHB
AJBYB
AJEEA
AJNCP
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ALXQX
APIBT
APWMN
ARIXL
ATGXG
AXUDD
AYOIW
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BQDIO
BR6
BSWAC
BTRTY
BVRKM
C45
CDBKE
CITATION
COF
CS3
CZ4
DAKXR
DIK
DILTD
DU5
D~K
E3Z
EBS
EE~
EMOBN
ENERS
F5P
F9B
FECEO
FHSFR
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
GAUVT
GJXCC
GX1
H13
H5~
HAR
HW0
HZ~
IOX
J21
J5H
JXSIZ
KAQDR
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
L7B
M-Z
MHKGH
ML0
N9A
NGC
NLBLG
NOMLY
NOYVH
O9-
OAUYM
OAWHX
OBOKY
OCZFY
ODMLO
OHH
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
P2P
PAFKI
PEELM
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
R44
RD5
ROL
ROX
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
TCURE
TEORI
TJX
TLC
TR2
VVN
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7H
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YSK
YXANX
ZKX
~91
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
KBUDW
.55
.GJ
1CY
354
3O-
41~
AAGKA
AAJQQ
AAPGJ
AAQQT
AAUQX
AAWDT
AAYJJ
ABDPE
ABIME
ABNGD
ABPIB
ABSMQ
ABZEO
ACBNA
ACFRR
ACPQN
ACUKT
ACVCV
ACZBC
ADMTO
ADTPV
AEHUL
AEKPW
AFFNX
AFFQV
AFSHK
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGQPQ
AI.
AJDVS
ANFBD
AOWAS
APJGH
AQDSO
AQKUS
ASAOO
ASPBG
ATDFG
ATTQO
AVNTJ
AVWKF
AZFZN
BZKNY
C1A
CAG
CXTWN
DFGAJ
EIHJH
EJD
ELUNK
F1U
FEDTE
HVGLF
MBLQV
MBTAY
MVM
N4W
NTWIH
NU-
NVLIB
O0~
OBFPC
OHT
O~Y
PB-
QBD
RNI
ROZ
RZF
RZO
TCN
TMA
VH1
X7M
XJT
XOL
YQJ
ZCG
ZGI
ZKB
ZXP
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c9d0944add6d995a8a3ae0c7fbd373b54f695258b538db12182b09e0bda340773
ISSN 0006-8950
1460-2156
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 06:41:09 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:39:11 EDT 2025
Fri May 09 12:13:39 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 17:51:01 EDT 2025
Sat May 31 02:12:01 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:46:14 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:37 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Keywords NfL
MSA
multiple system atrophy
Multiple system atrophy
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c459t-c9d0944add6d995a8a3ae0c7fbd373b54f695258b538db12182b09e0bda340773
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC9762941
Huw R Morris, Wassilios G Meissner and Henry Houlden contributed equally to this work.
ORCID 0000-0003-0752-1813
0000-0002-5473-3774
0000-0003-1551-5691
0000-0002-2280-7273
0000-0002-7797-0756
0000-0001-7200-0139
0000-0002-9671-0212
0000-0002-6801-6194
0000-0002-2866-7777
0000-0002-7250-8597
0000-0003-1814-5024
0000-0001-6844-882X
0000-0002-1410-6397
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9762941
PMID 35903017
PQID 2696863941
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_320698
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9762941
hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03817584v1
proquest_miscellaneous_2696863941
pubmed_primary_35903017
crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awac253
crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_brain_awac253
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-12-19
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-12-19
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-12-19
  day: 19
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: US
PublicationTitle Brain (London, England : 1878)
PublicationTitleAlternate Brain
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
References Khalil (2022122116040735400_awac253-B8) 2018; 14
Kollensperger (2022122116040735400_awac253-B32) 2007; 22
Wenning (2022122116040735400_awac253-B40) 2013; 12
Jecmenica-Lukic (2022122116040735400_awac253-B2) 2012; 11
Steinacker (2022122116040735400_awac253-B24) 2018; 91
Nicoletti (2022122116040735400_awac253-B33) 2006; 239
Petzold (2022122116040735400_awac253-B35) 2005; 233
Trojanowski (2022122116040735400_awac253-B5) 2007; 33
Rodrigues (2022122116040735400_awac253-B28) 2020; 12
van der Ende (2022122116040735400_awac253-B25) 2019; 18
Pereira (2022122116040735400_awac253-B38) 2017; 58
Loh (2022122116040735400_awac253-B29) 2011; 59
Larner (2022122116040735400_awac253-B16) 2014; 26
Hampel (2022122116040735400_awac253-B39) 2018; 14
Wilke (2022122116040735400_awac253-B12) 2018; 265
Schrag (2022122116040735400_awac253-B34) 2000; 54
Wilke (2022122116040735400_awac253-B19) 2020; 12
Steinacker (2022122116040735400_awac253-B26) 2017; 88
Mattsson (2022122116040735400_awac253-B37) 2017; 74
Guevara (2022122116040735400_awac253-B30) 2016; 2016
Zhang (2022122116040735400_awac253-B36) 2011; 2011
Papapetropoulos (2022122116040735400_awac253-B4) 2007; 78
Stefanova (2022122116040735400_awac253-B3) 2009; 8
Kang (2022122116040735400_awac253-B15) 2018; 18
Byrne (2022122116040735400_awac253-B18) 2018; 10
Zhang (2022122116040735400_awac253-B22) 2022; 37
Gaetani (2022122116040735400_awac253-B7) 2019; 90
Gilman (2022122116040735400_awac253-B13) 2008; 71
Hansson (2022122116040735400_awac253-B9) 2017; 88
Magdalinou (2022122116040735400_awac253-B10) 2015; 86
Kuhle (2022122116040735400_awac253-B17) 2016; 54
Hall (2022122116040735400_awac253-B23) 2012; 69
Singer (2022122116040735400_awac253-B11) 2020; 88
Manouchehrinia (2022122116040735400_awac253-B42) 2020; 7
Ashton (2022122116040735400_awac253-B6) 2021; 12
Preische (2022122116040735400_awac253-B21) 2019; 25
Paviour (2022122116040735400_awac253-B31) 2006; 129
Byrne (2022122116040735400_awac253-B27) 2017; 16
Akamine (2022122116040735400_awac253-B43) 2020; 10
Wenning (2022122116040735400_awac253-B14) 2004; 19
Quinn (2022122116040735400_awac253-B1) 1989; 52
Andersson (2022122116040735400_awac253-B20) 2020; 95
Hviid (2022122116040735400_awac253-B41) 2020; 80
References_xml – volume: 18
  start-page: 1103
  year: 2019
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B25
  article-title: Serum neurofilament light chain in genetic frontotemporal dementia: A longitudinal, multicentre cohort study
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30354-0
– volume: 88
  start-page: 961
  year: 2017
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B26
  article-title: Neurofilament as a blood marker for diagnosis and monitoring of primary progressive aphasias
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003688
– volume: 58
  start-page: 14
  year: 2017
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B38
  article-title: Association between cerebrospinal fluid and plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers with brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease
  publication-title: Neurobiol Aging
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.002
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1771
  year: 2007
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B32
  article-title: Diffusion weighted imaging best discriminates PD from MSA-P: A comparison with tilt table testing and heart MIBG scintigraphy
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.21614
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1391
  year: 2004
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B14
  article-title: Development and validation of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS)
  publication-title: Movement Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.20255
– volume: 90
  start-page: 870
  year: 2019
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B7
  article-title: Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in neurological disorders
  publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-320106
– volume: 12
  start-page: 3400
  year: 2021
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B6
  article-title: A multicentre validation study of the diagnostic value of plasma neurofilament light
  publication-title: Nat Commun
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23620-z
– volume: 59
  start-page: 266
  year: 2011
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B29
  article-title: A Hot Cross Bun sign from diffusion tensor imaging and tractography perspective
  publication-title: Neurol India
  doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.79143
– volume: 74
  start-page: 557
  year: 2017
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B37
  article-title: Association of plasma neurofilament light with neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117
– volume: 88
  start-page: 503
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B11
  article-title: Alpha-synuclein oligomers and neurofilament light chain in spinal fluid differentiate multiple system atrophy from Lewy body synucleinopathies
  publication-title: Ann Neurol
  doi: 10.1002/ana.25824
– volume: 16
  start-page: 601
  year: 2017
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B27
  article-title: Neurofilament light protein in blood as a potential biomarker of neurodegeneration in Huntington’s disease: A retrospective cohort analysis
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30124-2
– volume: 11
  start-page: 361
  year: 2012
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B2
  article-title: Premotor signs and symptoms of multiple system atrophy
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70022-4
– volume: 78
  start-page: 327
  year: 2007
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B4
  article-title: Causes of death in multiple system atrophy
  publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.103929
– volume: 10
  start-page: eaat7108
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B18
  article-title: Evaluation of mutant huntingtin and neurofilament proteins as potential markers in Huntington’s disease
  publication-title: Sci Transl Med
  doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat7108
– volume: 7
  start-page: 139
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B42
  article-title: Confounding effect of blood volume and body mass index on blood neurofilament light chain levels
  publication-title: Ann Clin Transl Neurol
  doi: 10.1002/acn3.50972
– volume: 91
  start-page: e1390
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B24
  article-title: Serum neurofilament light chain in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006318
– volume: 233
  start-page: 183
  year: 2005
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B35
  article-title: Neurofilament phosphoforms: Surrogate markers for axonal injury, degeneration and loss
  publication-title: J Neurol Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.03.015
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1655
  year: 2016
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B17
  article-title: Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa
  publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med
  doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-1195
– volume: 265
  start-page: 1618
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B12
  article-title: Serum neurofilament light is increased in multiple system atrophy of cerebellar type and in repeat-expansion spinocerebellar ataxias: A pilot study
  publication-title: J Neurol
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8893-9
– volume: 52
  start-page: 78
  year: 1989
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B1
  article-title: Multiple system atrophy–The nature of the beast
  publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.Suppl.78
– volume: 25
  start-page: 277
  year: 2019
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B21
  article-title: Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease
  publication-title: Nat Med
  doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0304-3
– volume: 239
  start-page: 825
  year: 2006
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B33
  article-title: MR imaging of middle cerebellar peduncle width: Differentiation of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson disease
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393050459
– volume: 10
  start-page: 20350
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B43
  article-title: Renal function is associated with blood neurofilament light chain level in older adults
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76990-7
– volume: 33
  start-page: 615
  year: 2007
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B5
  article-title: Proposed neuropathological criteria for the post mortem diagnosis of multiple system atrophy
  publication-title: Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00907.x
– volume: 86
  start-page: 1240
  issue: 11
  year: 2015
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B10
  article-title: A panel of nine cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers may identify patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes
  publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309562
– volume: 54
  start-page: 697
  year: 2000
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B34
  article-title: Differentiation of atypical parkinsonian syndromes with routine MRI
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.54.3.697
– volume: 80
  start-page: 291
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B41
  article-title: Reference interval and preanalytical properties of serum neurofilament light chain in Scandinavian adults
  publication-title: Scand J Clin Lab Invest
  doi: 10.1080/00365513.2020.1730434
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1172
  year: 2009
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B3
  article-title: Multiple system atrophy: An update
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70288-1
– volume: 26
  start-page: 555
  year: 2014
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B16
  article-title: A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in the detection of dementia
  publication-title: Int Psychogeriatr
  doi: 10.1017/S1041610213002329
– volume: 129
  start-page: 1040
  year: 2006
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B31
  article-title: Longitudinal MRI in progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy: Rates and regions of atrophy
  publication-title: Brain
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awl021
– volume: 14
  start-page: 639
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B39
  article-title: Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: Mapping the road to the clinic
  publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol
  doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0079-7
– volume: 88
  start-page: 930
  year: 2017
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B9
  article-title: Blood-based NfL: A biomarker for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorder
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003680
– volume: 95
  start-page: 143
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B20
  article-title: Blood and cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light differentially detect neurodegeneration in early Alzheimer’s disease
  publication-title: Neurobiol Aging
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.07.018
– volume: 12
  start-page: 264
  year: 2013
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B40
  article-title: The natural history of multiple system atrophy: A prospective European cohort study
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70327-7
– volume: 14
  start-page: 577
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B8
  article-title: Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders
  publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol
  doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z
– volume: 2011
  start-page: 546871
  year: 2011
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B36
  article-title: Joint assessment of structural, perfusion, and diffusion MRI in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia
  publication-title: Int J Alzheimer’s Dis
  doi: 10.4061/2011/546871
– volume: 18
  start-page: 261
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B15
  article-title: Montreal cognitive assessment reflects cognitive reserve
  publication-title: BMC Geriatrics
  doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0951-8
– volume: 12
  start-page: e11803
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B19
  article-title: Neurofilaments in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: Blood biomarkers at the preataxic and ataxic stage in humans and mice
  publication-title: EMBO Mol Med
  doi: 10.15252/emmm.201911803
– volume: 71
  start-page: 670
  year: 2008
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B13
  article-title: Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15
– volume: 12
  start-page: eabc2888
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B28
  article-title: Mutant huntingtin and neurofilament light have distinct longitudinal dynamics in Huntington’s disease
  publication-title: Sci Transl Med
  doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc2888
– volume: 37
  start-page: 421
  year: 2022
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B22
  article-title: Neurofilament light chain predicts disease severity and progression in multiple system atrophy
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.28847
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1445
  year: 2012
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B23
  article-title: Accuracy of a panel of 5 cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of patients with dementia and/or parkinsonian disorders
  publication-title: Arch Neurol
  doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.1654
– volume: 2016
  start-page: 9631041
  year: 2016
  ident: 2022122116040735400_awac253-B30
  article-title: Whole-brain atrophy rate in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy
  publication-title: Parkinson’s Dis
SSID ssj0014326
Score 2.568699
Snippet Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by...
Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialed in multiple system atrophy (MSA). Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by...
In this large multiple system atrophy cohort, Chelban et al. show that plasma NfL correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis, and...
SourceID swepub
pubmedcentral
hal
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 4398
SubjectTerms association
Biomarkers
blood
cerebrospinal-fluid
chain
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
diagnosis
differentiation
Disease Progression
Humans
Intermediate Filaments
Life Sciences
MSA
Multiple System Atrophy
neurodegeneration
Neurofilament Proteins
Neurons and Cognition
Neurosciences
Neurosciences & Neurology
Neurovetenskaper
NfL
Original
Title Neurofilament light levels predict clinical progression and death in multiple system atrophy
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903017
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2696863941
https://hal.science/hal-03817584
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9762941
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/320698
Volume 145
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdrB2MvY99L94E2Rl86p7Ykf-ixhJbso3tZO_owMJIlL2bBKYnTQf_6nSRbjmkG3V6cYCtS0P1yuTvd_Q6h9yXTEU3KKChkkgSMFjzIlOmhkQrChSZE22Ywp1-T6Tn7dBFf9CUEtrqkkePiemtdyf9IFe6BXE2V7D9I1k8KN-A9yBeuIGG43krGjlmjAqGaE_258bMP5iYLaGVq_1VVNH3lo03EciQc9sBAGdvPRDt8SqEjdT4wwfGOw9ozH4mq3tr8w0UUsjTbiChMZnouXVz1-7g_9_i1dNg7HvfqeKmvg28L2KnaVdv4R6CsXNbQZLwZlyC2RUqr_TpdmwQZd7SyXtc67sgOVGRDdYJllG3V6Y7vSi5tpORE_BYFcfzCW4iyf64v87WEl3ylc0rChGc76C4BF8K62x8_-xMmRm0rPv8tW_5VWOzQLnXYLjSwV3ZmJlv2pityM6N2wDtrbZWzh-hB62TgI4eYR-iOrh-je6dtGsUT9GMAHGyBgx1wcAsc3AEHbwAHg8SxBQ6uatwBBzvg4BY4T9H5yfHZZBq0bTaCgsW8CQquwMdnwvQW4zwWmaBCh0VaSkVTKmNWJjwmcSbhv1HJyFD-y5DrUCpBWZim9BnarRe1foEwFSKmiodM64hJLUUE9iUpw0SRgjDFR-hDt5l50XLQm1Yo89zlQtDc7n3e7v0I7fvhl4585W8D34Fk_BiDhOnRl9zcsxSUYGVfRSP0thNcDjrUHIyJWi_Wq5wYhigw1RmMee4E6eeiMTdRg3SE0oGIB4sNn9TVzPK0g6VP7Jz7DgyDj2xB6t5tB75E9_tf3Cu02yzX-jXYxo18Y0H-B4UkwbM
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neurofilament+light+levels+predict+clinical+progression+and+death+in+multiple+system+atrophy&rft.jtitle=Brain+%28London%2C+England+%3A+1878%29&rft.au=Chelban%2C+V.&rft.au=Nikram%2C+E.&rft.au=Perez-Soriano%2C+A.&rft.au=Wilke%2C+C.&rft.date=2022-12-19&rft.issn=0006-8950&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fbrain%2Fawac253&rft.externalDocID=oai_gup_ub_gu_se_320698
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-8950&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-8950&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-8950&client=summon