Putting the cart before the horse: mixed-methods participatory investigation of working equid harnessing practices in three selected towns of the Oromia national regional state in Ethiopia

• Published in: BMC veterinary research Vol. 20; no. 1; p. 113
• Main Authors: Merridale-Punter, Mathilde S, Elias, Belay, Wodajo, Abel L, El-Hage, Charles M, Zewdu, Hanna, Tesfaye, Reta, Hailegebreal, Gizachew, Sori, Teshale, Wiethoelter, Anke K, Hitchens, Peta L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 22.03.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Animal Husbandry - methods; Animals; Behavior; Cart; Cities; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data collection; Donkey; Equids; Equipment and supplies; Ethiopia - epidemiology; Harness; Horse; Mixed-methods; Public opinion; Questionnaires; Regression analysis; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ethiopia; Harness; Donkey; Horse; Mixed-methods; Cart
• DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-03967-3
• ISSN: 1746-6148

Millions of working equids provide socio-economic support for many low-income communities worldwide. With the prevalence of harness-related wounds reported as higher than 60%, this study aims to describe the equipment used by working equids in three locations of the Ethiopian national regional state of Oromia (Fiche, Bishoftu and Shashamene), and the attitudes and practices of equid owners, users and harness makers regarding work equipment. This mixed-methods study consists of cross-sectional surveying of working equids used for taxi or transport of goods or water, as well as cart-driver questionnaires and focus groups (FG) with working equid stakeholders. Activities conducted with FG included participatory ranking of equipment attributes and equipment drawing exercises. Indicators of equipment design and assembly, as well as cart-driver attitudes and practices were described quantitatively. Associations between equipment characteristics and species, work-type and cart-driver indicators were investigated through univariable logistic regression models, whereas focus group discussions were transcribed and analysed thematically. In total, 368 working equid surveys and cart-driver questionnaires were completed and 87 participants took part in nine FG. Equipment composition and characteristics differed considerably from ideal animal draught and harnessing principles described in the literature, with none of the observed harnesses adhering to all principles and thus not considered fully adequate. Various harness compositions were used, with only saddles and breast collars present in all. Donkey equipment had fewer components than that of horses, such as swingle trees (OR 0.02; 95% CI 0.01-0.06; p < 0.001) or girths (OR 0.09; 95%CI 0.02-0.4; p = 0.002). Horse equipment was more likely to have functional elements such as breeching (OR 7.8; 95% CI 2.9-20.9; p < 0.001). Of all equipment attributes, FG participants ranked cost, design and impact on animal wellbeing as having the highest importance. Thematic analysis identified motivations and priorities regarding equipment; awareness and knowledge of design and function; barriers to using ideal equipment; and consequences of equipment design and practices as key themes. Various weaknesses of design, assembly and use of equid work equipment were identified. Promoting behavioural change through awareness and training could lead to a sustainable improvement of work equipment quality, access, and prevention of equipment-related problems.