Disability level’s impact on blood pressure-mortality association in older long-term care adults: evidence from a large Chinese cohort study

Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability. This prospective cohort study was based on the gove...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC geriatrics Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 478 - 12
Main Authors Zhong, Yue, Feng, Chuanteng, Hou, Lisha, Yang, Ming, Zhang, Xinjun, Wu, Jinhui, Dong, Birong, Jia, Peng, Yang, Shujuan, Dou, Qingyu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 31.05.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability. This prospective cohort study was based on the government-led long-term care programme in Chengdu, China, including 41,004 consecutive disabled adults aged ≥ 60 years. BP was measured during the baseline survey by trained medical personnel using electronic sphygmomanometers. Disability profile was assessed using the Barthel index. The association between blood pressure and mortality was analyzed with doubly robust estimation, which combined exposure model by inverse probability weighting and outcome model fitted with Cox regression. The non-linearity was examined by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. The associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and all-cause mortality were close to a U-shaped curve in mild-moderate disability group (Barthel index ≥ 40), and a reversed J-shaped in severe disability group (Barthel index < 40). In mild-moderate disability group, SBP < 135 mmHg was associated with elevated all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10-1.33), compared to SBP between 135 and 150 mmHg. In severe disability group, SBP < 150 mmHg increased all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.16-1.27), compared to SBP between 150 and 170 mmHg. The associations were robust in subgroup analyses in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity and antihypertensive treatment. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 67 mmHg (HR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.18-1.42) in mild-moderate disability group and < 79 mmHg (HR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.11-1.20) in severe disability group both demonstrated an increased all-cause mortality risk. The optimal SBP range was found to be higher in older individuals in long-term care with severe disability (150-170mmHg) compared to those with mild to moderate disability (135-150mmHg). This study provides new evidence that antihypertensive treatment should be administered cautiously in severe disability group in long-term care setting. Additionally, assessment of disability using the Barthel index can serve as a valuable tool in customizing the optimal BP management strategy. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100049973).
AbstractList Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability.BACKGROUNDEvidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability.This prospective cohort study was based on the government-led long-term care programme in Chengdu, China, including 41,004 consecutive disabled adults aged ≥ 60 years. BP was measured during the baseline survey by trained medical personnel using electronic sphygmomanometers. Disability profile was assessed using the Barthel index. The association between blood pressure and mortality was analyzed with doubly robust estimation, which combined exposure model by inverse probability weighting and outcome model fitted with Cox regression. The non-linearity was examined by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality.METHODSThis prospective cohort study was based on the government-led long-term care programme in Chengdu, China, including 41,004 consecutive disabled adults aged ≥ 60 years. BP was measured during the baseline survey by trained medical personnel using electronic sphygmomanometers. Disability profile was assessed using the Barthel index. The association between blood pressure and mortality was analyzed with doubly robust estimation, which combined exposure model by inverse probability weighting and outcome model fitted with Cox regression. The non-linearity was examined by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality.The associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and all-cause mortality were close to a U-shaped curve in mild-moderate disability group (Barthel index ≥ 40), and a reversed J-shaped in severe disability group (Barthel index < 40). In mild-moderate disability group, SBP < 135 mmHg was associated with elevated all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10-1.33), compared to SBP between 135 and 150 mmHg. In severe disability group, SBP < 150 mmHg increased all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.16-1.27), compared to SBP between 150 and 170 mmHg. The associations were robust in subgroup analyses in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity and antihypertensive treatment. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 67 mmHg (HR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.18-1.42) in mild-moderate disability group and < 79 mmHg (HR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.11-1.20) in severe disability group both demonstrated an increased all-cause mortality risk.RESULTSThe associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and all-cause mortality were close to a U-shaped curve in mild-moderate disability group (Barthel index ≥ 40), and a reversed J-shaped in severe disability group (Barthel index < 40). In mild-moderate disability group, SBP < 135 mmHg was associated with elevated all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10-1.33), compared to SBP between 135 and 150 mmHg. In severe disability group, SBP < 150 mmHg increased all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.16-1.27), compared to SBP between 150 and 170 mmHg. The associations were robust in subgroup analyses in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity and antihypertensive treatment. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 67 mmHg (HR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.18-1.42) in mild-moderate disability group and < 79 mmHg (HR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.11-1.20) in severe disability group both demonstrated an increased all-cause mortality risk.The optimal SBP range was found to be higher in older individuals in long-term care with severe disability (150-170mmHg) compared to those with mild to moderate disability (135-150mmHg). This study provides new evidence that antihypertensive treatment should be administered cautiously in severe disability group in long-term care setting. Additionally, assessment of disability using the Barthel index can serve as a valuable tool in customizing the optimal BP management strategy.CONCLUSIONThe optimal SBP range was found to be higher in older individuals in long-term care with severe disability (150-170mmHg) compared to those with mild to moderate disability (135-150mmHg). This study provides new evidence that antihypertensive treatment should be administered cautiously in severe disability group in long-term care setting. Additionally, assessment of disability using the Barthel index can serve as a valuable tool in customizing the optimal BP management strategy.Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100049973).TRIAL REGISTRATIONChinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100049973).
Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability. This prospective cohort study was based on the government-led long-term care programme in Chengdu, China, including 41,004 consecutive disabled adults aged [greater than or equal to] 60 years. BP was measured during the baseline survey by trained medical personnel using electronic sphygmomanometers. Disability profile was assessed using the Barthel index. The association between blood pressure and mortality was analyzed with doubly robust estimation, which combined exposure model by inverse probability weighting and outcome model fitted with Cox regression. The non-linearity was examined by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. The associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and all-cause mortality were close to a U-shaped curve in mild-moderate disability group (Barthel index [greater than or equal to] 40), and a reversed J-shaped in severe disability group (Barthel index < 40). In mild-moderate disability group, SBP < 135 mmHg was associated with elevated all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10-1.33), compared to SBP between 135 and 150 mmHg. In severe disability group, SBP < 150 mmHg increased all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.16-1.27), compared to SBP between 150 and 170 mmHg. The associations were robust in subgroup analyses in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity and antihypertensive treatment. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 67 mmHg (HR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.18-1.42) in mild-moderate disability group and < 79 mmHg (HR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.11-1.20) in severe disability group both demonstrated an increased all-cause mortality risk. The optimal SBP range was found to be higher in older individuals in long-term care with severe disability (150-170mmHg) compared to those with mild to moderate disability (135-150mmHg). This study provides new evidence that antihypertensive treatment should be administered cautiously in severe disability group in long-term care setting. Additionally, assessment of disability using the Barthel index can serve as a valuable tool in customizing the optimal BP management strategy.
BackgroundEvidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability.MethodsThis prospective cohort study was based on the government-led long-term care programme in Chengdu, China, including 41,004 consecutive disabled adults aged ≥ 60 years. BP was measured during the baseline survey by trained medical personnel using electronic sphygmomanometers. Disability profile was assessed using the Barthel index. The association between blood pressure and mortality was analyzed with doubly robust estimation, which combined exposure model by inverse probability weighting and outcome model fitted with Cox regression. The non-linearity was examined by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality.ResultsThe associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and all-cause mortality were close to a U-shaped curve in mild-moderate disability group (Barthel index ≥ 40), and a reversed J-shaped in severe disability group (Barthel index < 40). In mild-moderate disability group, SBP < 135 mmHg was associated with elevated all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10–1.33), compared to SBP between 135 and 150 mmHg. In severe disability group, SBP < 150 mmHg increased all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.16–1.27), compared to SBP between 150 and 170 mmHg. The associations were robust in subgroup analyses in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity and antihypertensive treatment. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 67 mmHg (HR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.18–1.42) in mild-moderate disability group and < 79 mmHg (HR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.11–1.20) in severe disability group both demonstrated an increased all-cause mortality risk.ConclusionThe optimal SBP range was found to be higher in older individuals in long-term care with severe disability (150-170mmHg) compared to those with mild to moderate disability (135-150mmHg). This study provides new evidence that antihypertensive treatment should be administered cautiously in severe disability group in long-term care setting. Additionally, assessment of disability using the Barthel index can serve as a valuable tool in customizing the optimal BP management strategy.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100049973).
Background Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability. Methods This prospective cohort study was based on the government-led long-term care programme in Chengdu, China, including 41,004 consecutive disabled adults aged [greater than or equal to] 60 years. BP was measured during the baseline survey by trained medical personnel using electronic sphygmomanometers. Disability profile was assessed using the Barthel index. The association between blood pressure and mortality was analyzed with doubly robust estimation, which combined exposure model by inverse probability weighting and outcome model fitted with Cox regression. The non-linearity was examined by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. Results The associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and all-cause mortality were close to a U-shaped curve in mild-moderate disability group (Barthel index [greater than or equal to] 40), and a reversed J-shaped in severe disability group (Barthel index < 40). In mild-moderate disability group, SBP < 135 mmHg was associated with elevated all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10-1.33), compared to SBP between 135 and 150 mmHg. In severe disability group, SBP < 150 mmHg increased all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.16-1.27), compared to SBP between 150 and 170 mmHg. The associations were robust in subgroup analyses in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity and antihypertensive treatment. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 67 mmHg (HR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.18-1.42) in mild-moderate disability group and < 79 mmHg (HR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.11-1.20) in severe disability group both demonstrated an increased all-cause mortality risk. Conclusion The optimal SBP range was found to be higher in older individuals in long-term care with severe disability (150-170mmHg) compared to those with mild to moderate disability (135-150mmHg). This study provides new evidence that antihypertensive treatment should be administered cautiously in severe disability group in long-term care setting. Additionally, assessment of disability using the Barthel index can serve as a valuable tool in customizing the optimal BP management strategy. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100049973). Keywords: Older adults, Disability, Blood pressure, Long-term care
Abstract Background Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability. Methods This prospective cohort study was based on the government-led long-term care programme in Chengdu, China, including 41,004 consecutive disabled adults aged ≥ 60 years. BP was measured during the baseline survey by trained medical personnel using electronic sphygmomanometers. Disability profile was assessed using the Barthel index. The association between blood pressure and mortality was analyzed with doubly robust estimation, which combined exposure model by inverse probability weighting and outcome model fitted with Cox regression. The non-linearity was examined by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. Results The associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and all-cause mortality were close to a U-shaped curve in mild-moderate disability group (Barthel index ≥ 40), and a reversed J-shaped in severe disability group (Barthel index < 40). In mild-moderate disability group, SBP < 135 mmHg was associated with elevated all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10–1.33), compared to SBP between 135 and 150 mmHg. In severe disability group, SBP < 150 mmHg increased all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.16–1.27), compared to SBP between 150 and 170 mmHg. The associations were robust in subgroup analyses in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity and antihypertensive treatment. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 67 mmHg (HR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.18–1.42) in mild-moderate disability group and < 79 mmHg (HR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.11–1.20) in severe disability group both demonstrated an increased all-cause mortality risk. Conclusion The optimal SBP range was found to be higher in older individuals in long-term care with severe disability (150-170mmHg) compared to those with mild to moderate disability (135-150mmHg). This study provides new evidence that antihypertensive treatment should be administered cautiously in severe disability group in long-term care setting. Additionally, assessment of disability using the Barthel index can serve as a valuable tool in customizing the optimal BP management strategy. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100049973).
Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with mortality in older adults in long-term care setting with different levels of disability. This prospective cohort study was based on the government-led long-term care programme in Chengdu, China, including 41,004 consecutive disabled adults aged ≥ 60 years. BP was measured during the baseline survey by trained medical personnel using electronic sphygmomanometers. Disability profile was assessed using the Barthel index. The association between blood pressure and mortality was analyzed with doubly robust estimation, which combined exposure model by inverse probability weighting and outcome model fitted with Cox regression. The non-linearity was examined by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. The associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and all-cause mortality were close to a U-shaped curve in mild-moderate disability group (Barthel index ≥ 40), and a reversed J-shaped in severe disability group (Barthel index < 40). In mild-moderate disability group, SBP < 135 mmHg was associated with elevated all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10-1.33), compared to SBP between 135 and 150 mmHg. In severe disability group, SBP < 150 mmHg increased all-cause mortality risks (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.16-1.27), compared to SBP between 150 and 170 mmHg. The associations were robust in subgroup analyses in terms of age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity and antihypertensive treatment. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 67 mmHg (HR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.18-1.42) in mild-moderate disability group and < 79 mmHg (HR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.11-1.20) in severe disability group both demonstrated an increased all-cause mortality risk. The optimal SBP range was found to be higher in older individuals in long-term care with severe disability (150-170mmHg) compared to those with mild to moderate disability (135-150mmHg). This study provides new evidence that antihypertensive treatment should be administered cautiously in severe disability group in long-term care setting. Additionally, assessment of disability using the Barthel index can serve as a valuable tool in customizing the optimal BP management strategy. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100049973).
ArticleNumber 478
Audience Academic
Author Feng, Chuanteng
Yang, Shujuan
Zhong, Yue
Hou, Lisha
Wu, Jinhui
Dou, Qingyu
Jia, Peng
Yang, Ming
Zhang, Xinjun
Dong, Birong
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yue
  surname: Zhong
  fullname: Zhong, Yue
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Chuanteng
  surname: Feng
  fullname: Feng, Chuanteng
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lisha
  surname: Hou
  fullname: Hou, Lisha
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ming
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Ming
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Xinjun
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Xinjun
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jinhui
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Jinhui
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Birong
  surname: Dong
  fullname: Dong, Birong
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Peng
  surname: Jia
  fullname: Jia, Peng
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Shujuan
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Shujuan
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Qingyu
  surname: Dou
  fullname: Dou, Qingyu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38822230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkstu1DAUhiNURC_wAiyQJTZsUnxLYrOrhlulSmxgbZ3YJ1NXTjzYSaXZ9QnY83o8CZ6ZUi5CXvjo1-f_-Jf-0-poihNW1XNGzxlT7evMuOq6mnJZ04ZqWW8fVSdMdqzmgqmjP-bj6jTnG0pZp3j7pDoWSnHOBT2pvr31GXof_LwlAW8x_Lj7nokfN2BnEifShxgd2STMeUlYjzHNsIch52g9zL5AfiIxOEwkxGldz5hGYiEhAbeEOb8heOsdThbJkOJIgARIaySraz9hRmLjdXEleV7c9mn1eICQ8dn9fVZ9ef_u8-pjffXpw-Xq4qq2stFzzdtG2jL2TNAWObMUtAChnSwJdV_mxg2N1gK7nSy1UMJKbBQVTMvGibPq8uDrItyYTfIjpK2J4M1eiGltIM3eBjQMnVBadj30g1QDgOWdRotcCSeRd8Xr1cFrk-LXBfNsRp8thgATxiWb8kUhW9koUdCX_6A3cUlTSbqjWqWoEt1vag1lv5-GOCewO1Nz0elGt1SptlDn_6HKcTh6W5oy-KL_9eDF_fKlH9E9pP5VhgLwA2BTzDnh8IAwanaNM4fGmdI4s2-c2YqfywLIng
Cites_doi 10.1186/s12877-019-1189-9
10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61092-7
10.3414/ME17-01-0051
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03831
10.1056/NEJMoa0801369
10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30113-4
10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2555
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01948.x
10.1186/s12916-015-0328-1
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.037
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026687
10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32136-X
10.1093/aje/kwq439
10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950
10.1093/ageing/afaa028
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12787
10.1016/j.archger.2016.06.018
10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6
10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.055
10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309
10.1093/ageing/afz072
10.1056/NEJMoa1511939
10.1093/ageing/afw122
10.1093/ajh/hpab142
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026
10.1093/eurheartj/ehz071
10.1056/NEJMoa2111437
10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.033
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x
10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006
10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8012
10.1016/j.arr.2020.101150
10.1093/ageing/afaa031
10.1111/jgs.18301
10.3389/fgene.2015.00205
10.1001/jama.2016.7050
10.1136/bmj.k2158
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14683
10.1093/ageing/afv141
10.1038/ajh.2011.106
10.1161/01.CIR.103.9.1245
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01922
10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.013
10.7326/M16-1785
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12877-024-05094-y
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database


MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2318
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_1ed38947babf48faac279ece283d4e27
A795960886
38822230
10_1186_s12877_024_05094_y
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: The National Key R&D Program of China
  grantid: 2023YFC3604701
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIHN
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PMFND
3V.
7QP
7TK
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-2654cc45b1306e21c0a93a39d41789b93a5df5993e73a3949383c4e58031945d3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2318
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:32:07 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 17:56:33 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 03:35:41 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:10:33 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:08:33 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:58:57 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:36:47 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Disability
Blood pressure
Older adults
Long-term care
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c459t-2654cc45b1306e21c0a93a39d41789b93a5df5993e73a3949383c4e58031945d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12877-024-05094-y
PMID 38822230
PQID 3066880837
PQPubID 44817
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1ed38947babf48faac279ece283d4e27
proquest_miscellaneous_3063464583
proquest_journals_3066880837
gale_infotracmisc_A795960886
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A795960886
pubmed_primary_38822230
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_024_05094_y
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-05-31
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-05-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-05-31
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC geriatrics
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Geriatr
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References MC Odden (5094_CR20) 2012; 172
JAH Masoli (5094_CR19) 2020; 49
A Benetos (5094_CR33) 2015; 175
PK Whelton (5094_CR12) 2018; 71
JT Wright Jr (5094_CR7) 2015; 373
J Fan (5094_CR39) 2020; 5
V Fuster (5094_CR3) 2017; 69
N Brusselaers (5094_CR24) 2017; 56
X Liu (5094_CR38) 2023; 71
S Aarts (5094_CR47) 2015; 4
B Williams (5094_CR14) 2018; 39
G Ogliari (5094_CR30) 2015; 44
A Douros (5094_CR31) 2019; 40
L Molander (5094_CR16) 2008; 56
H Bouwstra (5094_CR22) 2019; 20
S Bulterijs (5094_CR43) 2015; 6
YB Lv (5094_CR18) 2018; 361
CV Granger (5094_CR23) 1979; 60
T Unger (5094_CR15) 2020; 75
L Mallet (5094_CR35) 2007; 370
LA Graham (5094_CR42) 2022; 35
JA Masoli (5094_CR40) 2020; 49
SS Virani (5094_CR2) 2021; 143
R Ravindrarajah (5094_CR41) 2017; 135
A Benetos (5094_CR36) 2012; 60
EO Hoogendijk (5094_CR46) 2019; 394
S Lip (5094_CR28) 2019; 74
G Mancia (5094_CR17) 2014; 63
NS Beckett (5094_CR6) 2008; 358
CA Peralta (5094_CR45) 2014; 64
S Abdi (5094_CR4) 2019; 19
JD Williamson (5094_CR9) 2016; 315
F Rea (5094_CR34) 2020; 76
G Cicolini (5094_CR49) 2011; 24
AP Bress (5094_CR11) 2016; 67
J Warwick (5094_CR8) 2015; 13
L Pennells (5094_CR29) 2021; 42
MJ Funk (5094_CR26) 2011; 173
OM Todd (5094_CR44) 2019; 48
K Rådholm (5094_CR37) 2016; 45
A Zamudio-Rodríguez (5094_CR48) 2020; 49
Z Feng (5094_CR21) 2020; 396
SS Franklin (5094_CR1) 2001; 103
Y Zhang (5094_CR25) 2018; 49
P Lei (5094_CR5) 2016; 67
A Angelini (5094_CR32) 2020; 63
H Bang (5094_CR27) 2005; 61
W Zhang (5094_CR10) 2021; 385
A Qaseem (5094_CR13) 2017; 166
References_xml – volume: 19
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 5094_CR4
  publication-title: BMC Geriatr
  doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1189-9
– volume: 370
  start-page: 185
  year: 2007
  ident: 5094_CR35
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61092-7
– volume: 56
  start-page: 401
  year: 2017
  ident: 5094_CR24
  publication-title: Method Inf Med
  doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0051
– volume: 64
  start-page: 472
  year: 2014
  ident: 5094_CR45
  publication-title: Hypertension
  doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03831
– volume: 358
  start-page: 1887
  year: 2008
  ident: 5094_CR6
  publication-title: New Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801369
– volume: 5
  start-page: e650
  year: 2020
  ident: 5094_CR39
  publication-title: Lancet Public Health
  doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30113-4
– volume: 172
  start-page: 1162
  year: 2012
  ident: 5094_CR20
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2555
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1853
  year: 2008
  ident: 5094_CR16
  publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01948.x
– volume: 13
  start-page: 78
  year: 2015
  ident: 5094_CR8
  publication-title: BMC Med
  doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0328-1
– volume: 67
  start-page: 463
  year: 2016
  ident: 5094_CR11
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.037
– volume: 135
  start-page: 2357
  year: 2017
  ident: 5094_CR41
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026687
– volume: 396
  start-page: 1362
  year: 2020
  ident: 5094_CR21
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32136-X
– volume: 173
  start-page: 761
  year: 2011
  ident: 5094_CR26
  publication-title: Am J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq439
– volume: 143
  start-page: e254
  year: 2021
  ident: 5094_CR2
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950
– volume: 49
  start-page: 807
  year: 2020
  ident: 5094_CR40
  publication-title: Age Ageing
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa028
– volume: 49
  start-page: 807
  year: 2020
  ident: 5094_CR19
  publication-title: Age Ageing
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa028
– volume: 74
  start-page: 767
  year: 2019
  ident: 5094_CR28
  publication-title: Hypertension
  doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12787
– volume: 60
  start-page: 14
  year: 1979
  ident: 5094_CR23
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
– volume: 67
  start-page: 21
  year: 2016
  ident: 5094_CR5
  publication-title: Arch Gerontol Geriatr
  doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.06.018
– volume: 39
  start-page: 3021
  year: 2018
  ident: 5094_CR14
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
– volume: 394
  start-page: 1365
  year: 2019
  ident: 5094_CR46
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1503
  year: 2012
  ident: 5094_CR36
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.055
– volume: 4
  start-page: 131
  year: 2015
  ident: 5094_CR47
  publication-title: J Frailty Aging
– volume: 42
  start-page: 2439
  year: 2021
  ident: 5094_CR29
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309
– volume: 48
  start-page: 627
  year: 2019
  ident: 5094_CR44
  publication-title: Age Ageing
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz072
– volume: 373
  start-page: 2103
  year: 2015
  ident: 5094_CR7
  publication-title: New Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939
– volume: 45
  start-page: 826
  year: 2016
  ident: 5094_CR37
  publication-title: Age Ageing
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw122
– volume: 49
  start-page: 789
  year: 2018
  ident: 5094_CR25
  publication-title: J Sichuan Univ (Med Sci Ed)
– volume: 35
  start-page: 65
  year: 2022
  ident: 5094_CR42
  publication-title: Am J Hypertens
  doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab142
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1334
  year: 2020
  ident: 5094_CR15
  publication-title: Hypertension
  doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2021
  year: 2019
  ident: 5094_CR31
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz071
– volume: 385
  start-page: 1268
  year: 2021
  ident: 5094_CR10
  publication-title: New Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111437
– volume: 20
  start-page: 420
  year: 2019
  ident: 5094_CR22
  publication-title: J Am Med Dir Assoc
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.033
– volume: 61
  start-page: 962
  year: 2005
  ident: 5094_CR27
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x
– volume: 71
  start-page: e127
  year: 2018
  ident: 5094_CR12
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006
– volume: 175
  start-page: 989
  year: 2015
  ident: 5094_CR33
  publication-title: JAMA Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8012
– volume: 63
  start-page: 101150
  year: 2020
  ident: 5094_CR32
  publication-title: Ageing Res Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101150
– volume: 49
  start-page: 764
  year: 2020
  ident: 5094_CR48
  publication-title: Age Ageing
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa031
– volume: 71
  start-page: 2131
  year: 2023
  ident: 5094_CR38
  publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc
  doi: 10.1111/jgs.18301
– volume: 6
  start-page: 205
  year: 2015
  ident: 5094_CR43
  publication-title: Front Genet
  doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00205
– volume: 315
  start-page: 2673
  year: 2016
  ident: 5094_CR9
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050
– volume: 361
  start-page: k2158
  year: 2018
  ident: 5094_CR18
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2158
– volume: 76
  start-page: 442
  year: 2020
  ident: 5094_CR34
  publication-title: Hypertension
  doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14683
– volume: 44
  start-page: 932
  year: 2015
  ident: 5094_CR30
  publication-title: Age Ageing
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv141
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1073
  year: 2011
  ident: 5094_CR49
  publication-title: Am J Hypertens
  doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.106
– volume: 103
  start-page: 1245
  year: 2001
  ident: 5094_CR1
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.9.1245
– volume: 63
  start-page: 29
  year: 2014
  ident: 5094_CR17
  publication-title: Hypertension
  doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01922
– volume: 69
  start-page: 3002
  year: 2017
  ident: 5094_CR3
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.013
– volume: 166
  start-page: 430
  year: 2017
  ident: 5094_CR13
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/M16-1785
SSID ssj0017826
Score 2.3536906
Snippet Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations of BP with...
Background Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations...
BackgroundEvidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the associations...
Abstract Background Evidence of the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for older adults with disability in long-term care is limited. We aim to analyze the...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 478
SubjectTerms Activities of daily living
Aged
Aged patients
Aged, 80 and over
Antihypertensives
Blood pressure
Blood Pressure - physiology
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular diseases
Care and treatment
China - epidemiology
Chronic illnesses
Cognitive ability
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Comorbidity
Demographic aspects
Disability
Disability evaluation
Disabled Persons
East Asian People
Female
Humans
Hypertension
Hypertension - epidemiology
Hypertension - mortality
Hypertension - physiopathology
Influence
Long term health care
Long-term care
Long-Term Care - methods
Long-Term Care - trends
Long-term care of the sick
Male
Measurement
Medical personnel
Medical records
Middle Aged
Mortality
Mortality - trends
Nursing homes
Older adults
Older people
Prospective Studies
Variables
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07j9QwELbQFYgG8SZwoEFCokDWbRI_YrrjcTohQcVJ11mOPUFIS4J2s8V2_AJ6_h6_hBknu7BQ0NBZjiPZnvF8Y3nmGyGeYtuVOpVa2qBRKpu0DHHhZFdGY2s0zrU52uK9Ob9Qby_15W-lvjgmbKIHnjbupMREmKpsG9pONV0IsbIOIxIsJoVVziMnzNtdpub3A8I9s0uRaczJmqywtZLwSDLfiZLbAxjKbP1_2-Q_PM2MOGc3xPXZVYTTaYo3xRXsb4mr7-bH8Nvi2-uZH3fcwpJjf358_b6GKe0Rhh5yTDrkQNfNCuXn7Gjz4PBLJPCph4ELdcNy6D9KttPAwWCQeTnWLwDnqqPAeSgQYMmR48BVt3GNwOV1VyNkjto74uLszYdX53IuryCj0m6UldEqUrMlGDNYlXERXB1qlxRtn2uprVOnyX9By93K0WU2KtQNJz4pneq74qgferwvYOEaF1TddVWZlMW2wYQGSQ7JxLqxqRDPd7vtv0wsGj7fPhrjJ9l4ko3PsvHbQrxkgexHMgN27iC98LNe-H_pRSGesTg9n9NxFWKY0w1owsx45U-5yLohG2sKcXwwks5XPPy8Uwg_n--1px0zZPnodl-IJ_vP_CfHrPU4bPKYmt-Nm7oQ9yZF2i-pbrJjtnjwP5b6UFyrJtUmRD0WR-Nqg4_IVRrbx_lU_ARMbxLn
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Ni9UwEA-6gngRv62uEkHwIGFf23y0XmT9WBZBTy68W0iT6SK8bde27_Bu_gXe_ff8S5xJ897yFLyFJi1tZzLzSzLzG8ZeQtPmKuRKGKdASBOUcH5Rizb32pSg67qJ0RZf9OmZ_LRUy7ThNqawyq1NjIY69J72yI8Q2mrUNVxPvb38LqhqFJ2uphIa19kNoi4jrTbL3YIrR--nt4kylT4a0RYbI9ArCWI9kWKz54wiZ_-_lvkvvBn9zskddjsBRn48S_guuwbdPXbzczoSv89-fkgsudOGrygC6PePXyOfkx953_EYmc5juOt6AHER4TYNdleC4d863lO5br7qu3NB1ppTSBiP7BzjGw6p9iinbBTu-IrixznV3oYROBXZHSYemWofsLOTj1_fn4pUZEF4qepJFFpJj80GnZmGIvcLV5eurIPE31c32FahVYhiwNBlWeOS1ktQFaU_SRXKh-yg6zt4zPiirmony7Yt8iANNBUE0IByCNqXlQkZe7392_Zy5tKwcQ1SaTvLxqJsbJSN3WTsHQlkN5J4sOOFfji3aVrZHAIiLmka17Syap3zhanBA4KmIKEwGXtF4rQ0W6fBeZeSDvCFiffKHlOpdY2WVmfscG8kzjK_371VCJtm-WivdDJjL3bddCdFrnXQr-OYkk6PqzJjj2ZF2n1SWUV4tnjy_4c_ZbeKWWnRYx6yg2lYwzOEQlPzPOr7Hz2sCSs
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Disability level’s impact on blood pressure-mortality association in older long-term care adults: evidence from a large Chinese cohort study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38822230
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3066880837
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3063464583
https://doaj.org/article/1ed38947babf48faac279ece283d4e27
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1ba9RAFB56AfFFvButywhCH2R0k8wtgkhXW4rQIsWFxZdhMjMpwpq02Sy4_8Ef7TmT7JbVPvgSQmYSknOfzDnnI-R1KKtU-FQwZUVgXHnBrBsXrEqdVHmQRVHGbItzeTrlX2ZitkPWcEcDARe3Lu0QT2razt_-ul59BIX_EBVey3cLsLFKMfA2DLuZcLbaJfvgmRQiGpzxm10F8IZ9tZFKGcQ1el1Ec-szthxV7Of_r9X-KxaNPunkPrk3BJP0qOf-A7IT6ofkztmwXf6I_P48dNDtVnSO2UGHC9qXRdKmpjFnncZE2GUb2M9IA5xqb1hGf9S0QSBvOm_qS4Z2nGKyGI19OxbvaRhQSSnWqVBL55hZThGVOywCRfjdtqOxh-1jMj05_vbplA3wC8xxUXQsk4I7OC3BzcmQpW5si9zmhQfK6qKEc-ErAfFNUHiZF7DYdTwIjYVRXPj8Cdmrmzo8I3Rc6MLyvKqy1HMVSh18kAE44qXLtfIJebOmtbnqu2yYuDrR0vScMcAZEzljVgmZIDs2M7FDdrzQtJdmUDiTBg-xGFelLSuuK2tdporgAoRTnodMJeQQmWlQsrrWOjuUI8ALY0csc4Qg7BJssEzIwdZM0D-3PbwWB7MWXwMUk2AZYfWfkFebYbwTc9rq0CzjnBz3lXWekKe9GG0-KdcxcBs__4-7X5C7WS-34FAPyF7XLsNLiJS6ckR21UyNyP7k-PzrxSj-bxhFlYDjxeT7H7z4EyI
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkYAL4lkCBYwE4oCsbhLHTpAQKpRqSx-nVurNOPakQlqSspsV2hu_gDt_gh_FL2HGSbZakLj1FvmlxDOeRzwzH2PPoazizMeZ0DYDIbXPhHWjQlSxUzoFVRRliLY4UuMT-fE0O11jv4ZcGAqrHGRiENS-cfSPfAtNW4W8hv7U2_OvglCj6HZ1gNDo2GIfFt_QZZu92dtB-r5Ikt0Px-_HokcVEE5mRSsSlUmHjyVKbwVJ7Ea2SG1aeBnrvCjxOfNVhmobNDXLAn04JyHLKd9HZj7Fda-wq6h4R-Ts6dOlg4fzEzUk5uRqa4ayX2uBWlBQlRUpFivKL2AE_KsJ_rJvg57bvcVu9gYq3-446jZbg_oOu3bYX8HfZT92-qq87YJPKOLo9_efM94lW_Km5iESnofw2vkUxJdg3tNge8EI_HPNG4IH55OmPhOkHTiFoPFQDWT2mkOPdcop-4VbPqF4dU5Y3zADTqC-05aHyrj32MmlbP99tl43NTxgfFTkhZVpVSWxlxrKHDwoQDp45dJc-4i9GnbbnHe1O0zweXJlOtoYpI0JtDGLiL0jgixHUt3t0NBMz0x_jE0MHi08qUtbVjKvrHWJLsABGmleQqIj9pLIaUg6tFPrbJ_kgC9MdbbMNkG7K5TsKmKbKyPxVLvV7oEhTC9VZubiDETs2bKbZlKkXA3NPIxJ6bY6TyO20THS8pPSPJiDo4f_X_wpuz4-PjwwB3tH-4_YjaRjYNTWm2y9nc7hMZphbfkk8D5nny77sP0BMJ5DVA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disability+level%27s+impact+on+blood+pressure-mortality+association+in+older+long-term+care+adults%3A+evidence+from+a+large+Chinese+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=BMC+geriatrics&rft.au=Zhong%2C+Yue&rft.au=Feng%2C+Chuanteng&rft.au=Hou%2C+Lisha&rft.au=Yang%2C+Ming&rft.date=2024-05-31&rft.issn=1471-2318&rft.eissn=1471-2318&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12877-024-05094-y&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2318&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2318&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2318&client=summon