Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System

Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of gynecology and obstetrics Vol. 123; no. 2; pp. 119 - 123
Main Authors Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Shaaban, Omar M, Hassanin, Ahmed I, Ibraheem, Alaa A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed. Results The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each). Conclusion The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.
AbstractList To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women's Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed. The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each). The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.
Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed. Results The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each). Conclusion The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level.METHODSProspective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women's Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed.RESULTSThe CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each).CONCLUSIONThe TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women's Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed. Results The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each). Conclusion The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.
Author Shaaban, Omar M
Abdel-Aleem, Hany
Ibraheem, Alaa A
Hassanin, Ahmed I
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Abdel-Aleem, Hany
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Shaaban, Omar M
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Hassanin, Ahmed I
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Ibraheem, Alaa A
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkk9v1DAQxS1URLcLX4AD8pFLUv-Jk1hCSKsVbIsq9dD2bHmdSXHw2oudFOXb42hLDxwQp5FG770Z_WYu0JkPHhB6T0lJCa0vh9IOj6FkhPKSiJJQ-gqtaNvIgleNPEMrQhgpGibZObpIaSCE0IbSN-iccSla0dYrBBuv3ZxswqHHBpKOoD3uwNkniDPWI96kZKcRP_ilk-w446uQjnbUDk_J-kc8fgd8Dx7vYpiOeOt0NvTW6NEGj-_mNMLhLXrda5fg3XNdo4evX-63V8XN7e56u7kpTCWkLACg1XJvpOQcOtP0YIxgwAwjPesFiF5oKZumkr0mumpJta8qqPuOC9mKmvI1-njKPcbwc4I0qoNNBpzTHsKUFK0qXmV0ecAasZPUxJBShF4doz3oOCtK1IJXDWrBqxa8igiV8WbTh-f8aX-A7sXyh2cWNCfBL-tg_o9Idf1td0vpss-nkxMynycLUSVjwRvobAQzqi7Yf2_2-S-7cdbnK7gfMEMawhTzoTMBlZgi6m55jeUzKCeE16zhvwFpk7Tv
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202341201059
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2022_2114333
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_46153_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijgo_2014_11_026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_siny_2021_101199
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2017_1279142
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2016_03_007
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2020_1718625
crossref_primary_10_5812_semj_96275
crossref_primary_10_12737_6453
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_12092
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jgyn_2015_08_002
crossref_primary_10_28982_josam_805389
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0148343
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2214_109X_15_70094_X
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0026_4784_19_04416_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_12372
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0148138
crossref_primary_10_36106_ijar_8300479
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2019_1624949
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_039098
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_017_1625_9
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0208623
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijph_ijph_1928_21
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70394-0
10.1371/journal.pone.0014566
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7
10.1056/NEJM198812083192304
10.2471/BLT.06.039842
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.199
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.09.005
10.2471/BLT.11.093369
10.1186/1742-4755-6-18
10.1016/j.midw.2010.03.010
10.1053/beog.2000.0156
10.1007/s00404-012-2531-z
10.1056/NEJM198410043111405
10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00753.x
10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
2013.
Copyright_xml – notice: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
– notice: 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
– notice: 2013.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1879-3479
EndPage 123
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_ijgo_2013_05_011
23958586
IJGO119
S0020729213003627
1_s2_0_S0020729213003627
Genre article
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Egypt
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Egypt
GroupedDBID -
0R
0SF
1
1B1
1OB
1OC
1RT
1~.
1~5
29J
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
55
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P
AABNK
AACTN
AAHHS
AAIKJ
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQXK
AASGY
AAXRX
AAXUO
AAZKR
ABBQC
ABCUV
ABFLS
ABHUG
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABPTK
ABWYI
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADAWD
ADBBV
ADDAD
ADEOM
ADEZE
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEKER
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFBPY
AFFNX
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFVGU
AFZJQ
AGHFR
AGJLS
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIACR
AITUG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJOXV
AJRQY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMRAJ
AMYDB
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BFHJK
BLXMC
BMXJE
C45
CS3
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
DUUFO
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FUBAC
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEC
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ
IHE
IPNFZ
J1W
K
KBYEO
LATKE
LCYCR
LEEKS
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
M29
M2X
M41
MEWTI
MO0
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N9A
NCXOZ
O-L
O66
O9-
OAUVE
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2W
PALCI
PC.
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SAMSI
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SSZ
SUPJJ
TEORI
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WUQ
WVDHM
WXSBR
X7M
YZZ
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
---
--K
.55
.~1
0R~
33P
8P~
AAEDW
AANLZ
ABJNI
ABQWH
ACGOF
ADBTR
ADMUD
AEIGN
AEUYR
AFFPM
AHBTC
AHPSJ
EFLBG
HZ~
RJQFR
ADVLN
AITYG
AKRWK
HGLYW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4599-eee8a9bc9933edc7fecc52e2c20f2f5e5f5a997749fa0a4804b44e6fd35985613
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0020-7292
IngestDate Sun Jul 21 06:28:38 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:14:07 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:53:47 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:45:37 EDT 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:32:40 EST 2024
Thu Aug 18 19:11:56 EDT 2022
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Cesarean delivery
Clinical audit
Classification of cesarean delivery
Ten Group Classification System
Language English
License 2013.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4599-eee8a9bc9933edc7fecc52e2c20f2f5e5f5a997749fa0a4804b44e6fd35985613
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 23958586
PQID 1443401699
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1443401699
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijgo_2013_05_011
pubmed_primary_23958586
wiley_primary_10_1016_j_ijgo_2013_05_011_IJGO119
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijgo_2013_05_011
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0020729213003627
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2013
  text: November 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle International journal of gynecology and obstetrics
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Gynaecol Obstet
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
References Runmei, Terence, Yonghu, Hong, Yuqin, Bailuan (bb0005) 2012; 90
Dosa (bb0020) 2001; 79
Homer, Kurinczuk, Spark, Brocklehurst, Knight (bb0040) 2010; 26
Scarella, Chamy, Sepúlveda, Belizán (bb0075) 2011; 154
Betrán, Gulmezoglu, Robson, Merialdi, Souza, Wojdyla (bb0095) 2009; 6
McCarthy, Rigg, Cady, Cullinane (bb0100) 2007; 47
Anderson, Lomas (bb0070) 1984; 311
Efekhar, Steer (bb0030) 2000; 320
Torloni, Betran, Souza, Widmer, Allen, Gulmezoglu (bb0080) 2011; 6
Chong, Su, Biswas (bb0015) 2012; 91
Jackson, Irvine (bb0035) 1998; 18
Cyr (bb0050) 2006; 194
Myers, Gleicher (bb0055) 1988; 319
(bb0090) 1985; 2
Charoenboon, Srisupundit, Tongsong (bb0025) 2013; 287
Robson (bb0060) 2001; 15
Roberts, Algert, Ford, Todd, Morris (bb0105) 2012; 2
Shah, Faundes, Machoki, Bataglia, Amokrane, Donner (bb0085) 2008; 86
Mohammadi, Källestål, Essén (bb0010) 2012; 57
Villar, Valladares, Wojdyla, Zavaleta, Carroli, Velazco (bb0045) 2006; 367
Robson, Scudamore, Walsh (bb0065) 1996; 174
1998; 18
2012; 91
2012; 90
2012; 2
2010; 26
1984; 311
1985; 2
2013; 287
2001; 15
2009; 6
2000; 320
2006; 194
1996; 174
2008; 86
2012; 57
1988; 319
2001; 79
2011; 6
2007; 47
2006; 367
2011; 154
Mohammadi (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0010|rf0010) 2012; 57
Chong (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0015|rf0015) 2012; 91
Roberts (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0105|rf0105) 2012; 2
Runmei (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0005|rf0005) 2012; 90
Robson (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0065|rf0065) 1996; 174
Dosa (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0020|rf0020) 2001; 79
Villar (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0045|rf0045) 2006; 367
Efekhar (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0030|rf0030) 2000; 320
Anderson (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0070|rf0070) 1984; 311
Shah (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0085|rf0085) 2008; 86
(10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0090|rf0100) 1985; 2
Homer (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0040|rf0040) 2010; 26
Jackson (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0035|rf0035) 1998; 18
Scarella (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0075|rf0075) 2011; 154
Myers (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0055|rf0055) 1988; 319
Torloni (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0080|rf0080) 2011; 6
Charoenboon (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0025|rf0025) 2013; 287
Robson (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0060|rf0060) 2001; 15
McCarthy (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0100|rf0095) 2007; 47
Betrán (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0095|rf0090) 2009; 6
Cyr (10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0050|rf0050) 2006; 194
References_xml – volume: 154
  start-page: 136
  year: 2011
  end-page: 140
  ident: bb0075
  article-title: Medical audit using the Ten Group Classification System and its impact on the cesarean section rate
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  contributor:
    fullname: Belizán
– volume: 86
  start-page: 126
  year: 2008
  end-page: 131
  ident: bb0085
  article-title: Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
  contributor:
    fullname: Donner
– volume: 6
  start-page: 18
  year: 2009
  ident: bb0095
  article-title: WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections
  publication-title: Reprod Health
  contributor:
    fullname: Wojdyla
– volume: 287
  start-page: 47
  year: 2013
  end-page: 52
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
  contributor:
    fullname: Tongsong
– volume: 15
  start-page: 179
  year: 2001
  end-page: 194
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Robson
– volume: 367
  start-page: 1819
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1829
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America
  publication-title: Lancet
  contributor:
    fullname: Velazco
– volume: 47
  start-page: 316
  year: 2007
  end-page: 320
  ident: bb0100
  article-title: A new way of looking at Caesarean section births
  publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Cullinane
– volume: 18
  start-page: 115
  year: 1998
  end-page: 119
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Irvine
– volume: 311
  start-page: 887
  year: 1984
  end-page: 892
  ident: bb0070
  article-title: Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Lomas
– volume: 6
  start-page: e14566
  year: 2011
  ident: bb0080
  article-title: Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review
  publication-title: PLoS One
  contributor:
    fullname: Gulmezoglu
– volume: 194
  start-page: 932
  year: 2006
  end-page: 936
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Myth of the ideal cesarean section rate: commentary and historic perspective
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Cyr
– volume: 26
  start-page: 532
  year: 2010
  end-page: 536
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: A novel use of a classification system to audit severe maternal morbidity
  publication-title: Midwifery
  contributor:
    fullname: Knight
– volume: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: bb0105
  article-title: Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  contributor:
    fullname: Morris
– volume: 57
  start-page: 43
  year: 2012
  end-page: 48
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: Clinical audits: A practical strategy for reducing cesarean section rates in a general hospital in Tehran, Iran
  publication-title: J Reprod Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Essén
– volume: 91
  start-page: 1422
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1427
  ident: bb0015
  article-title: Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital
  publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
  contributor:
    fullname: Biswas
– volume: 174
  start-page: 199
  year: 1996
  end-page: 205
  ident: bb0065
  article-title: Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Walsh
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1173
  year: 2001
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: Caesarean section delivery, an increasingly popular option
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
  contributor:
    fullname: Dosa
– volume: 320
  start-page: 1073
  year: 2000
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: Caesarean section controversy. Women choose caesarean section
  publication-title: BMJ
  contributor:
    fullname: Steer
– volume: 319
  start-page: 1511
  year: 1988
  end-page: 1516
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Gleicher
– volume: 2
  start-page: 436
  year: 1985
  end-page: 437
  ident: bb0090
  article-title: Appropriate technology for birth
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 90
  start-page: 488
  year: 2012
  end-page: 494
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Practice audits to reduce caesareans in a tertiary referral hospital in south-western China
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
  contributor:
    fullname: Bailuan
– volume: 18
  start-page: 115
  issue: (2)
  year: 1998
  end-page: 119
  article-title: The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol
– volume: 154
  start-page: 136
  issue: (2)
  year: 2011
  end-page: 140
  article-title: Medical audit using the Ten Group Classification System and its impact on the cesarean section rate
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
– volume: 6
  start-page: 18
  year: 2009
  article-title: WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections
  publication-title: Reprod Health
– volume: 320
  start-page: 1073
  issue: (7241)
  year: 2000
  article-title: Caesarean section controversy. Women choose caesarean section
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1173
  issue: (12)
  year: 2001
  article-title: Caesarean section delivery, an increasingly popular option
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
– volume: 26
  start-page: 532
  issue: (5)
  year: 2010
  end-page: 536
  article-title: A novel use of a classification system to audit severe maternal morbidity
  publication-title: Midwifery
– volume: 319
  start-page: 1511
  issue: (23)
  year: 1988
  end-page: 1516
  article-title: A successful program to lower cesarean‐section rates
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 194
  start-page: 932
  issue: (4)
  year: 2006
  end-page: 936
  article-title: Myth of the ideal cesarean section rate: commentary and historic perspective
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 174
  start-page: 199
  issue: (1 Pt 1)
  year: 1996
  end-page: 205
  article-title: Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 6
  start-page: e14566
  issue: (1)
  year: 2011
  article-title: Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 2
  issue: (5)
  year: 2012
  article-title: Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population‐based cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ Open
– volume: 90
  start-page: 488
  issue: (7)
  year: 2012
  end-page: 494
  article-title: Practice audits to reduce caesareans in a tertiary referral hospital in south‐western China
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
– volume: 86
  start-page: 126
  issue: (2)
  year: 2008
  end-page: 131
  article-title: Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
– volume: 2
  start-page: 436
  issue: (8452)
  year: 1985
  end-page: 437
  article-title: Appropriate technology for birth
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 47
  start-page: 316
  issue: (4)
  year: 2007
  end-page: 320
  article-title: A new way of looking at Caesarean section births
  publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
– volume: 91
  start-page: 1422
  issue: (12)
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1427
  article-title: Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital
  publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
– volume: 15
  start-page: 179
  issue: (1)
  year: 2001
  end-page: 194
  article-title: Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
– volume: 57
  start-page: 43
  issue: (1–2)
  year: 2012
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Clinical audits: A practical strategy for reducing cesarean section rates in a general hospital in Tehran, Iran
  publication-title: J Reprod Med
– volume: 311
  start-page: 887
  issue: (14)
  year: 1984
  end-page: 892
  article-title: Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 367
  start-page: 1819
  issue: (9525)
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1829
  article-title: Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 287
  start-page: 47
  issue: (1)
  year: 2013
  end-page: 52
  article-title: Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20‐year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
– volume: 174
  start-page: 199
  issue: (1 Pt 1)
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0065|rf0065
  article-title: Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70394-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Robson
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1173
  issue: (12)
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0020|rf0020
  article-title: Caesarean section delivery, an increasingly popular option
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
  contributor:
    fullname: Dosa
– volume: 6
  start-page: e14566
  issue: (1)
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0080|rf0080
  article-title: Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014566
  contributor:
    fullname: Torloni
– volume: 367
  start-page: 1819
  issue: (9525)
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0045|rf0045
  article-title: Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7
  contributor:
    fullname: Villar
– volume: 2
  issue: (5)
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0105|rf0105
  article-title: Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  contributor:
    fullname: Roberts
– volume: 319
  start-page: 1511
  issue: (23)
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0055|rf0055
  article-title: A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812083192304
  contributor:
    fullname: Myers
– volume: 86
  start-page: 126
  issue: (2)
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0085|rf0085
  article-title: Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
  doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.039842
  contributor:
    fullname: Shah
– volume: 194
  start-page: 932
  issue: (4)
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0050|rf0050
  article-title: Myth of the ideal cesarean section rate: commentary and historic perspective
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.199
  contributor:
    fullname: Cyr
– volume: 154
  start-page: 136
  issue: (2)
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0075|rf0075
  article-title: Medical audit using the Ten Group Classification System and its impact on the cesarean section rate
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.09.005
  contributor:
    fullname: Scarella
– volume: 90
  start-page: 488
  issue: (7)
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0005|rf0005
  article-title: Practice audits to reduce caesareans in a tertiary referral hospital in south-western China
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
  doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.093369
  contributor:
    fullname: Runmei
– volume: 2
  start-page: 436
  issue: (8452)
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0090|rf0100
  article-title: Appropriate technology for birth
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 6
  start-page: 18
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0095|rf0090
  article-title: WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections
  publication-title: Reprod Health
  doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-18
  contributor:
    fullname: Betrán
– volume: 26
  start-page: 532
  issue: (5)
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0040|rf0040
  article-title: A novel use of a classification system to audit severe maternal morbidity
  publication-title: Midwifery
  doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.03.010
  contributor:
    fullname: Homer
– volume: 57
  start-page: 43
  issue: (1-2)
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0010|rf0010
  article-title: Clinical audits: A practical strategy for reducing cesarean section rates in a general hospital in Tehran, Iran
  publication-title: J Reprod Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Mohammadi
– volume: 15
  start-page: 179
  issue: (1)
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0060|rf0060
  article-title: Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0156
  contributor:
    fullname: Robson
– volume: 287
  start-page: 47
  issue: (1)
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0025|rf0025
  article-title: Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2531-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Charoenboon
– volume: 18
  start-page: 115
  issue: (2)
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0035|rf0035
  article-title: The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Jackson
– volume: 320
  start-page: 1073
  issue: (7241)
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0030|rf0030
  article-title: Caesarean section controversy. Women choose caesarean section
  publication-title: BMJ
  contributor:
    fullname: Efekhar
– volume: 311
  start-page: 887
  issue: (14)
  year: 1984
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0070|rf0070
  article-title: Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM198410043111405
  contributor:
    fullname: Anderson
– volume: 47
  start-page: 316
  issue: (4)
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0100|rf0095
  article-title: A new way of looking at Caesarean section births
  publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00753.x
  contributor:
    fullname: McCarthy
– volume: 91
  start-page: 1422
  issue: (12)
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011-BIB0015|rf0015
  article-title: Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital
  publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Chong
SSID ssj0001711
Score 2.2093358
Snippet Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at...
To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level....
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level....
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 119
SubjectTerms Adult
Cesarean delivery
Cesarean Section - classification
Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data
Cicatrix - pathology
Classification of cesarean delivery
Clinical audit
Egypt
Feasibility Studies
Female
Hospitals, University
Humans
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Prospective Studies
Ten Group Classification System
Time Factors
Uterus - pathology
Young Adult
Title Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System
URI https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0020729213003627
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2013.05.011
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958586
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1443401699
Volume 123
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dS90wFD-Ig7GXofusU8lgb6MzSZN7m0eROae4wVDmW0jbE7kX6RXvvQ---LfvnKZVRBziW1takpxfcj6a3zkB-FJVXBU82rxslMlNiTXpQclX0RWhcZXt2O7Hv0YHp-bwzJ6twN6QC8O0yl73J53eaev-yU4vzZ3LyYRzfDWXvda8IUNqmDPKDRkjmtPfbu5oHmqs0ql5FCbx233iTOJ4TabnnACoilS9Uz1mnB46n_d92c4Y7a_B696LFLupo-uwgu0beHnc75O_BRxqjYhZFKQJArmGrWjwglkY1yIsBMEyWS7EHS9DDCeICKbCnwtyDMUJtqL7OSW6szOZVdQBKVKd83dwuv_9ZO8g7w9UyGtjncsRsQyuqsknKbCpx5Hwsxp1TWjpaNFGGxw7hC4GGUwpTWUMjmLDZf440ngPq-2sxY8gVFmPZBENUrxiZF2XUjcuNlqPZVW4UGbwdZCkv0x1M_xAKJt6lrtnuXtpPck9g_EgbD9khJIOw3m_oOZe-bn20j8APQN7--W9eePJJPy3xc8Dpp4WFO-ShBZnS2rJmMJwjRqXwYcE9u0IdOEovCpHGcgO_ScMzf88_PFbKbfxzI5-gld8l9IfN2F1cbXELfKDFtV2N9G34cXu0Z-_R_8AiGoEZg
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,4521,27955,27956,45618
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIgEXxJvwNBI3FGo79iY-ooqyLd1y2Uq9WU4yrrZC2aq7e-iF385MnLSqKhDiFuUh2zP2-Jv4mxmAj3XNWcGjzatWmdxU2JAdlHwVXRFaV9ue7T47mkyPzcGJPdmC3TEWhmmVg-1PNr231sOdnUGaO-eLBcf4ak57rflAhsxweQfuMhpgXtfnX9c8D1WqVDaP_CR-fYicSSSvxdkpRwCqIqXvVH_anW6jz5tgtt-N9h7BwwFGii-pp49hC7sncG82HJQ_BRyTjYhlFGQKAmHDTrT4k2kYlyKsBellsVmLa2KGGEuICObCnwpChmKOnej_Tom-eCbTinpNipTo_Bkc732d707zoaJC3hjrXI6IVXB1Q6CkwLYpIynQatQNqUtHizba4BgRuhhkMJU0tTE4iS3n-WNX4zlsd8sOX4JQVTORRTRIDouRTVNJ3brYal3KunChyuDTKEl_nhJn-JFRduZZ7p7l7qX1JPcMylHYfgwJJSOGq2FFrbzyK-2lv6X1DOzVlzcmjqc94a8tfhh16mlF8TFJ6HC5oZaMKQwnqXEZvEjKvhqBLhz5V9UkA9lr_x-G5vcPvv1Qyr36z46-h_vT-ezQH-4ffX8ND_hJioV8A9vriw2-JVC0rt_1k_43iN0F6g
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+cesarean+delivery+at+Assiut+University+Hospital+using+the+Ten+Group+Classification+System&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+gynecology+and+obstetrics&rft.au=Abdel%E2%80%90Aleem%2C+Hany&rft.au=Shaaban%2C+Omar+M.&rft.au=Hassanin%2C+Ahmed+I.&rft.au=Ibraheem%2C+Alaa+A.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2013.05.011&rft.externalDBID=10.1016%252Fj.ijgo.2013.05.011&rft.externalDocID=IJGO119
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00207292%2FS0020729213X00128%2Fcov150h.gif