To Naturalize or Not to Naturalize? An Issue for Cognitive Science as Well as Anthropology
Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin’s (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge‐rich human mental processes impose hermeneutic tasks, both on subjects and researchers. Psychology's current philosophy of science is ill suited to analyzing t...
Saved in:
| Published in | Topics in cognitive science Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 413 - 419 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.07.2012
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin’s (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge‐rich human mental processes impose hermeneutic tasks, both on subjects and researchers. Psychology's current philosophy of science is ill suited to analyzing these: Its demand for ‘‘stimulus control’’ needs to give way to ‘‘negotiation of mutual interpretation.’’ Cognitive science has ways to address these issues, as does anthropology. An example from my own work is about how defeasible logics are mathematical models of some aspects of simple hermeneutic processes. They explain processing relative to databases of knowledge and belief—that is, content. A specific example is syllogistic reasoning, which raises issues of experimenters’ interpretations of subjects’ reasoning. Science, especially since the advent of understandings of computation, does not have to be reductive. How does this approach transfer onto anthropological topics? Recent cognitive science approaches to anthropological topics have taken a reductive stance in terms of modules. We end with some speculations about a different cognitive approach to, for example, religion. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin's (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge-rich human mental processes impose hermeneutic tasks, both on subjects and researchers. Psychology's current philosophy of science is ill suited to analyzing these: Its demand for ''stimulus control'' needs to give way to ''negotiation of mutual interpretation.'' Cognitive science has ways to address these issues, as does anthropology. An example from my own work is about how defeasible logics are mathematical models of some aspects of simple hermeneutic processes. They explain processing relative to databases of knowledge and belief-that is, content. A specific example is syllogistic reasoning, which raises issues of experimenters' interpretations of subjects' reasoning. Science, especially since the advent of understandings of computation, does not have to be reductive. How does this approach transfer onto anthropological topics? Recent cognitive science approaches to anthropological topics have taken a reductive stance in terms of modules. We end with some speculations about a different cognitive approach to, for example, religion.Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin's (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge-rich human mental processes impose hermeneutic tasks, both on subjects and researchers. Psychology's current philosophy of science is ill suited to analyzing these: Its demand for ''stimulus control'' needs to give way to ''negotiation of mutual interpretation.'' Cognitive science has ways to address these issues, as does anthropology. An example from my own work is about how defeasible logics are mathematical models of some aspects of simple hermeneutic processes. They explain processing relative to databases of knowledge and belief-that is, content. A specific example is syllogistic reasoning, which raises issues of experimenters' interpretations of subjects' reasoning. Science, especially since the advent of understandings of computation, does not have to be reductive. How does this approach transfer onto anthropological topics? Recent cognitive science approaches to anthropological topics have taken a reductive stance in terms of modules. We end with some speculations about a different cognitive approach to, for example, religion. Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin’s (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge‐rich human mental processes impose hermeneutic tasks, both on subjects and researchers. Psychology's current philosophy of science is ill suited to analyzing these: Its demand for ‘‘stimulus control’’ needs to give way to ‘‘negotiation of mutual interpretation.’’ Cognitive science has ways to address these issues, as does anthropology. An example from my own work is about how defeasible logics are mathematical models of some aspects of simple hermeneutic processes. They explain processing relative to databases of knowledge and belief—that is, content. A specific example is syllogistic reasoning, which raises issues of experimenters’ interpretations of subjects’ reasoning. Science, especially since the advent of understandings of computation, does not have to be reductive. How does this approach transfer onto anthropological topics? Recent cognitive science approaches to anthropological topics have taken a reductive stance in terms of modules. We end with some speculations about a different cognitive approach to, for example, religion. Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin’s (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge‐rich human mental processes impose hermeneutic tasks, both on subjects and researchers. Psychology's current philosophy of science is ill suited to analyzing these: Its demand for ‘‘stimulus control’’ needs to give way to ‘‘negotiation of mutual interpretation.’’ Cognitive science has ways to address these issues, as does anthropology. An example from my own work is about how defeasible logics are mathematical models of some aspects of simple hermeneutic processes. They explain processing relative to databases of knowledge and belief—that is, content. A specific example is syllogistic reasoning, which raises issues of experimenters’ interpretations of subjects’ reasoning. Science, especially since the advent of understandings of computation, does not have to be reductive. How does this approach transfer onto anthropological topics? Recent cognitive science approaches to anthropological topics have taken a reductive stance in terms of modules. We end with some speculations about a different cognitive approach to, for example, religion. |
| Author | Stenning, Keith |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Keith surname: Stenning fullname: Stenning, Keith organization: School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22684735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNkU1vEzEQhi3Uin7AX0A-ctnFH-u1ewGFFNpKbYrUQBEXy7uZLQ6bdbC9kPTX19ukEeJUS9aMPO88M545Qnud6wAhTElO03k3z6kUZaZkKXJGKMvTJSRfvUCHu8DezhfyAB2FMCekFCVlL9EBY6UqJBeH6MfU4YmJvTetvQfsPJ64iOO_jx_wqMMXIfSAmxQfu7vORvsH8E1toasBm4BvoW0HO-riT--WrnV361dovzFtgNdbe4y-fv40HZ9nl9dnF-PRZVYXQpFMEQWNqChQLoDNeHMCBVOVLKSERjJDoK4aKbkSklPBRc1nXJmKV5yQxhjGj9HbDXfp3e8eQtQLG-rUkOnA9UFTwooTTqWkSfpmK-2rBcz00tuF8Wv9NI8keL8R1N6F4KHRtY0mWtdFb2ybWHpYgJ7rYbZ6mLMeFqAfF6BXCaD-AzzVeEbqtvZf28L62Xl6ev3lZnATINsAbIiw2gGM_6VLyaXQt5Oz9NWrj99O6XfN-AOiWasO |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_bs3010042 crossref_primary_10_1111_tops_12161 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2015_00128 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1207/s15516709cog2804_1 10.4159/harvard.9780674418660 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323351.001.0001 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524496.001.0001 10.7551/mitpress/7964.001.0001 10.1007/s10339-009-0265-z 10.1177/1463499611416725 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9 10.1080/13546780342000007 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01196.x 10.1080/00207597108246692 10.1525/aa.2006.108.4.814 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01200.x |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Anthropology Psychology |
| EISSN | 1756-8765 |
| EndPage | 419 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 22684735 10_1111_j_1756_8765_2012_01200_x TOPS1200 ark_67375_WNG_22MBVD1X_2 |
| Genre | article Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- -DZ .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 24P 31~ 33P 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52S 52T 52U 52W 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A04 AABNI AAESR AAHHS AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABIVO ABLJU ABPVW ABSOO ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACHQT ACPOU ACSCC ACXQS ADBBV ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFPWT AHBTC AHMBA AIFKG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG COF D-C D-D DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSSH EBD EBS EJD EMOBN ESX F00 F01 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N G50 GODZA HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M LATKE LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MXFUL MXSSH N04 N06 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2Y P4C PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RWI RX1 SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHDPE WIH WII WIN WOHZO WQZ WRC WSUWO WXSBR XG1 XV2 ZZTAW ~IA ~WP AAHQN AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACUHS ACYXJ ADNMO AFWVQ AFYRF ALVPJ AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4580-808ef5b1e135e2d3f9e428b7477ef72a0ecbf77385731535c3d38ab3b300faa23 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 1756-8757 1756-8765 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 03:40:36 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:00:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:03:01 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:21:49 EST 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:57:31 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4580-808ef5b1e135e2d3f9e428b7477ef72a0ecbf77385731535c3d38ab3b300faa23 |
| Notes | ArticleID:TOPS1200 ark:/67375/WNG-22MBVD1X-2 istex:06AAFF03744C3FF5B36DB8A3DA56FEC7A022F70D ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01200.x |
| PMID | 22684735 |
| PQID | 1024931771 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1024931771 pubmed_primary_22684735 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1756_8765_2012_01200_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1756_8765_2012_01200_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1756_8765_2012_01200_x_TOPS1200 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_22MBVD1X_2 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-07 July 2012 2012-07-00 2012-Jul 20120701 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-07-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2012 text: 2012-07 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Topics in cognitive science |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Top Cogn Sci |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | Stroeken, K. (2011). Questioning cognitive and interpretive takes on ritual. Anthropological Theory, 11(3), 355-372. McClenon, J. (2002). Wondrous healing: Shamanism, human evolution, and the origin of religion. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press. Sorensen, J. (2006). A cognitive theory of magic. New York: Altamira. Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained. New York: Basic Books. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. Lienard, P., & Boyer, P. (2006). Whence collective rituals? A cultural selection model of ritualized behavior. American Anthropologist, 108(4), 814-827. Levy-Bruhl, L. (1923). How natives think. New York: Washington Square. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83. Hutchins, E. (1980). Culture and inference: A trobriand case study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Beller, S., Bender, A., & Medin, D. L. (2012). Does cognitive science need anthropology? Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 342-353. Stenning, K., & van Lambalgen, M. (2008). Human reasoning and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Beller, S., & Spada, H. (2003). The logic of content effects in propositional reasoning: The case of conditional reasoning with a point of view. Thinking and Reasoning, 9(4), 335-378. Atran, S. (2004). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Stenning, K., & van Lambalgen, M. (2004). A little logic goes a long way: Basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Cognitive Science, 28(4), 481-530. Barrett, J. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 29-34. Beller, S. (2010). Deontic reasoning reviewed: Psychological questions, empirical findings, and current theories. Cognitive Processing, 11, 123-132. Faber, M. (2004). The psychological roots of religion. Amherst, MA: Prometheus. Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Luria, A. K. (1971). Towards the problem of the historical nature of psychological processes. International Journal of Psychology, 6(4), 259-272. Cohen, E. (2007). The mind possessed: The cognition of spirit possession in an Afro-Brazilian religious tradition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Oaksford, M., & Chater, C. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2010; 11 2010; 33 2006; 108 2001 2000; 4 2004; 28 2003; 9 1975 2008 2007 2011; 11 2006 2005 1994 2004 1980 2002 2012; 4 1971; 6 1923 Faber M. (e_1_2_4_10_1) 2004 McClenon J. (e_1_2_4_17_1) 2002 Stenning K. (e_1_2_4_22_1) 2007 e_1_2_4_3_1 Green D. P. (e_1_2_4_11_1) 1994 e_1_2_4_5_1 e_1_2_4_4_1 Atran S. (e_1_2_4_2_1) 2004 e_1_2_4_6_1 e_1_2_4_9_1 Sorensen J. (e_1_2_4_20_1) 2006 e_1_2_4_21_1 e_1_2_4_23_1 e_1_2_4_12_1 e_1_2_4_13_1 Scribner S. (e_1_2_4_19_1) 1975 e_1_2_4_24_1 Levy‐Bruhl L. (e_1_2_4_14_1) 1923 e_1_2_4_15_1 e_1_2_4_16_1 e_1_2_4_18_1 Boyer P. (e_1_2_4_8_1) 2001 Boyd R. (e_1_2_4_7_1) 2005 |
| References_xml | – reference: Hutchins, E. (1980). Culture and inference: A trobriand case study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. – reference: Sorensen, J. (2006). A cognitive theory of magic. New York: Altamira. – reference: Faber, M. (2004). The psychological roots of religion. Amherst, MA: Prometheus. – reference: Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. – reference: Barrett, J. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 29-34. – reference: Oaksford, M., & Chater, C. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. – reference: Levy-Bruhl, L. (1923). How natives think. New York: Washington Square. – reference: Beller, S., Bender, A., & Medin, D. L. (2012). Does cognitive science need anthropology? Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 342-353. – reference: Lienard, P., & Boyer, P. (2006). Whence collective rituals? A cultural selection model of ritualized behavior. American Anthropologist, 108(4), 814-827. – reference: Beller, S. (2010). Deontic reasoning reviewed: Psychological questions, empirical findings, and current theories. Cognitive Processing, 11, 123-132. – reference: Stenning, K., & van Lambalgen, M. (2004). A little logic goes a long way: Basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Cognitive Science, 28(4), 481-530. – reference: Cohen, E. (2007). The mind possessed: The cognition of spirit possession in an Afro-Brazilian religious tradition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. – reference: Stenning, K., & van Lambalgen, M. (2008). Human reasoning and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. – reference: Stroeken, K. (2011). Questioning cognitive and interpretive takes on ritual. Anthropological Theory, 11(3), 355-372. – reference: Beller, S., & Spada, H. (2003). The logic of content effects in propositional reasoning: The case of conditional reasoning with a point of view. Thinking and Reasoning, 9(4), 335-378. – reference: Atran, S. (2004). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. – reference: Luria, A. K. (1971). Towards the problem of the historical nature of psychological processes. International Journal of Psychology, 6(4), 259-272. – reference: Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. – reference: McClenon, J. (2002). Wondrous healing: Shamanism, human evolution, and the origin of religion. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press. – reference: Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83. – reference: Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained. New York: Basic Books. – volume: 11 start-page: 123 year: 2010 end-page: 132 article-title: Deontic reasoning reviewed: Psychological questions, empirical findings, and current theories publication-title: Cognitive Processing – volume: 4 start-page: 342 year: 2012 end-page: 353 article-title: Does cognitive science need anthropology? publication-title: Topics in Cognitive Science – year: 2005 – year: 1980 – volume: 6 start-page: 259 issue: 4 year: 1971 end-page: 272 article-title: Towards the problem of the historical nature of psychological processes publication-title: International Journal of Psychology – year: 2002 – year: 2001 – year: 2007 – volume: 108 start-page: 814 issue: 4 year: 2006 end-page: 827 article-title: Whence collective rituals? A cultural selection model of ritualized behavior publication-title: American Anthropologist – year: 2008 – volume: 11 start-page: 355 issue: 3 year: 2011 end-page: 372 article-title: Questioning cognitive and interpretive takes on ritual publication-title: Anthropological Theory – year: 2006 – year: 2004 – year: 1923 – volume: 28 start-page: 481 issue: 4 year: 2004 end-page: 530 article-title: A little logic goes a long way: Basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning publication-title: Cognitive Science – volume: 9 start-page: 335 issue: 4 year: 2003 end-page: 378 article-title: The logic of content effects in propositional reasoning: The case of conditional reasoning with a point of view publication-title: Thinking and Reasoning – start-page: 153 year: 1975 end-page: 173 – start-page: 179 year: 2007 end-page: 210 – volume: 33 start-page: 61 year: 2010 end-page: 83 article-title: The weirdest people in the world? publication-title: Behavioral and Brain Sciences – year: 1994 – volume: 4 start-page: 29 year: 2000 end-page: 34 article-title: Exploring the natural foundations of religion publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Science – ident: e_1_2_4_21_1 doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2804_1 – volume-title: Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_4_7_1 – volume-title: Religion explained year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_4_8_1 – ident: e_1_2_4_13_1 doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674418660 – ident: e_1_2_4_9_1 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323351.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_4_12_1 doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X – ident: e_1_2_4_18_1 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524496.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_4_23_1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/7964.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_4_4_1 doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0265-z – ident: e_1_2_4_24_1 doi: 10.1177/1463499611416725 – ident: e_1_2_4_3_1 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9 – ident: e_1_2_4_5_1 doi: 10.1080/13546780342000007 – volume-title: In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_4_2_1 – start-page: 153 volume-title: Reasoning: Representation and process year: 1975 ident: e_1_2_4_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_4_6_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01196.x – volume-title: The psychological roots of religion year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_4_10_1 – volume-title: Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_4_11_1 – volume-title: How natives think year: 1923 ident: e_1_2_4_14_1 – ident: e_1_2_4_16_1 doi: 10.1080/00207597108246692 – start-page: 179 volume-title: Integrating the mind year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_4_22_1 – volume-title: Wondrous healing: Shamanism, human evolution, and the origin of religion year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_4_17_1 – ident: e_1_2_4_15_1 doi: 10.1525/aa.2006.108.4.814 – volume-title: A cognitive theory of magic year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_4_20_1 |
| SSID | ssj0065612 |
| Score | 1.9261764 |
| Snippet | Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin’s (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge‐rich human mental... Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin’s (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge‐rich human mental... Several of Beller, Bender, and Medin's (2012) issues are as relevant within cognitive science as between it and anthropology. Knowledge-rich human mental... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 413 |
| SubjectTerms | Anthropology Cognition Cognitive Science - methods Culture Defeasible logic Humans Interpretation Knowledge Knowledge-rich processes Mental Processes Reasoning |
| Title | To Naturalize or Not to Naturalize? An Issue for Cognitive Science as Well as Anthropology |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-22MBVD1X-2/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1756-8765.2012.01200.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22684735 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1024931771 |
| Volume | 4 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dS8MwEA-iLyL4_TG_iCC-dbRJ07RP4rcITtGpw5eQxBRko5WtA_WvN5d2ZRMfRHxqCVzSXO4uv0svdwjtRzqRoYypl8pEe2FKIk8l0qp7EjLuKwsY3IHbdSu6fAivOqxTxT_BXZgyP0R94Aaa4ew1KLhUg0kl5ywCbWYQoUWacA3UbwKehNAtwEd3dSapCIpAuruRjoTxb0E9P3U0sVPNANPff4Khk6jWbUvnC6g7mlAZjdJtDgvV1J_fcj3-z4wX0XyFXvFRKW5LaMpky2hurNjCxzKarW3qxwp6bue4JV1uj9dPg_M-buUFLsYbD_FRhl0RQGwBND4ZxTPhyuxgOcBPpteD5_hIq-jh_Kx9culV5Rw8HbLYt3thbFKmAhNQZsgLTRNjfR9l_RluUk6kb7RKOWTX4dTaYabpC42loor6fioloWtoOsszs2GXjqUBVyRRmiQhpYliSktpLHqlsa9Y1EB8tHRCV7nOoeRGT4z5PJaXAngpgJfC8VK8N1BQU76V-T5-QXPgpKMmkP0uxMtxJp5aF4KQ6-PH06AjSAPtjcRHWC2GXzMyM_lwYIewbrCFcjxooPVSrureCCTk4ZTZSTnp-PV3ifbN7T28bv6ZcgvNQnsZn7yNpov-0OxYFFaoXadfXyXPHr8 |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dT9swED9N8ACatA321X0aCe0tVWLHcfI0ARsrG82mrYxqL5ZtHAlRJaikEvDX43PSqEU8oImnRFHOjs9359855zuA7cRkKlYpCwqVmSAuaBLoTDl1z2IuQu0Ag99wG-bJ4Cj-PubjthwQnoVp8kN0G26oGd5eo4LjhvSylgueoDpzDNGifTwHGvYdoFzFAt_ev_rd5ZJKsAykPx3pabi4FdZzV0tLa9Uqsv3yLiC6jGv9wrT_FCbzITXxKGf9Wa375vpWtscHGvMzeNICWLLTSNwGPLLlJjxeqLdwtQnrnVm9eg7_RhXJlU_vcXptSTUleVWTevHhZ7JTEl8HkDgMTfbmIU2ktTxEXZBjO5ngdbGnF3C0_3W0Nwjaig6BiXkauuUwtQXXkY0Yt_SEFZl17o92Lo2whaAqtEYXAhPsCOZMMTfshKVKM83CsFCKspewUlalfe3mjheR0DTThmYxY5nm2ihlHYBlaah50gMxnztp2nTnWHVjIhfcHsdLibyUyEvpeSkvexB1lOdNyo970Hzy4tERqOkZhswJLo_zb5LS4e7fL9FY0h5szeVHOkXGvzOqtNXswnXhPGGH5kTUg1eNYHWtUczJIxh3g_Lice_vkqOfv_7g7Zv_pvwIa4PR8FAeHuQ_3sI6vtOEK7-DlXo6s-8dKKv1B69sNyIyIto |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1RT9swELYQSBNCYozB6DY2T5r2liqx4zh5mhhdYTAytBWo9mLZri1NrRJUUgn49fM5adQiHtC0p0RRzo7Pd-fvnPMdQh8TnclYpjSwMtNBbEkSqEw6dc9ixkPlAIPfcDvLk-OL-GTIhk38E5yFqfNDtBtuoBneXoOCX4_sspJzloA2M4jQIl04Bhp2HZ5ci5MwBQnv_WxTSSVQBdIfjvQ0jD-I6nmspaWlag24fvsYDl2GtX5d6j9H4_mI6nCUcXdWqa6-f5Ds8f8MeQttNvAVH9Ty9gKtmGIbbSxUW7jbRuutUb17iX4PSpxLn9zjz73B5RTnZYWrxYef8UGBfRVA7BA0PpwHNOHG7mB5g6_MZALXxZ520EX_6-DwOGjqOQQ6ZmnoFsPUWKYiE1FmyIjazDjnRzmHhhvLiQyNVpZDeh1OnSFmmo5oKhVVNAytlITuotWiLMyemzpmI65IpjTJYkozxZSW0jj4StNQsaSD-HzqhG6SnUPNjYlYcHocLwXwUgAvheeluO2gqKW8rhN-PIHmk5eOlkBOxxAwx5m4yo8EIWdfLnvRUJAO-jAXH-HUGP7NyMKUsxvXhfODHZbjUQe9quWqbY1ARh5OmRuUl44nf5cY_Dj_Bbev_5nyPXp23uuL79_y0zdoHV6pY5XfotVqOjP7DpFV6p1Xtb-giCGS |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To+naturalize+or+not+to+naturalize%3F+An+issue+for+cognitive+science+as+well+as+anthropology&rft.jtitle=Topics+in+cognitive+science&rft.au=Stenning%2C+Keith&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.eissn=1756-8765&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=413&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1756-8765.2012.01200.x&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22684735&rft.externalDocID=22684735 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1756-8757&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1756-8757&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1756-8757&client=summon |